All Episodes
Previous Next
April 5, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:12
April 5, 2013, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program, documented to be almost always right 99.7% of the time, it's Friday, and you know what that means.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida, it's open line Friday!
Yip, yip, yahoo!
I fully intended to go to the calls in the last hour, but Snerdley asked me a question that I had to answer.
He didn't, he wanted to know where I found that 663,000 people left the labor force.
Because it's not reported in your drive-by media.
They know it.
They just choose to ignore it.
We now have 90 million American adults not working.
90 million, ladies and gentlemen.
And vast majority of them are capable.
90 million Americans.
8.8 million on disability in addition to everybody who's on some sort of an entitlement program.
We are a country in decline.
Steady decline.
A country in decay.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882, the email address, LRushbo at EIBnet.com.
A bunch of emails.
Well, how come, okay, Rush, if the media is made up of all these Democrat operatives, how come it all these Democrats and liberals are journalists?
How come those are the people who go into journalism?
There's an answer to that question.
I've answered it countless times in the past of the program.
I answered it again today.
And another bunch of emails.
How come you haven't talked about the Rutgers coach getting fired?
I'll get to that today.
I have my own thoughts on that that probably aren't going to make some people.
Well, I'm not even going to characterize it.
We'll get to that.
Get to all of that here in just a second.
I want to go back to a soundbite that we played on this program on Wednesday.
It was the third hour of the Today Show on NBC.
And it is the co-host, Willie Geist, the co-host, Natalie Morales, and the meteorologist, Al Roker.
And they are talking about a new poll from public policy polling.
And it was the poll that released the details on what people think are conspiracies.
Like 4% of the American people think that lizard people are running the world.
And 13% think that the Trilateral Commission is.
It was a poll to find out those kind of conspiracy theories that people believe in.
And in this poll, 37% of people said they thought that global warming was a hoax.
And the co-host, Willie Geist, and the co-host, Natalie Morales, are talking about this to Al Roker.
They took 20 widespread conspiracy theories and asked the American public what it thought.
Do you believe in these?
What did they say about us?
Global warming is a hoax.
37% believe that.
Wow.
37% of these people don't believe in global warming.
They think it's a hoax.
I mean, talking about Sandy, right?
I know.
It's breathtakingly naive, ignorant.
But here's Al Roker.
And he's like every other TV meteorologist.
By the way, if you want to be a TV meteorologist and enjoy your job and survive it, you have to buy into this global warming business.
And you have to it and I don't even think Al Roker knows it's a political movement.
You know what?
I really don't.
I don't think that half or more of the people involved in pushing this have any idea that it is a political movement of the left of the Democrat Party.
Anyway, at the time, unbeknownst to us, a young man in the audience, age 13, named Alex was listening.
And after hearing this soundbite, Alex called us yesterday.
He was one of the most articulate 13-year-olds I've ever spoken to.
And Alex described how he was curious about this on his own.
So he went to the library, the local library where he lives, and he looked things up.
He found reference materials, and he was able to learn for himself that the man-made global warming theory, i.e., climate destruction is taking place because of man-made activity.
He found it to be a hoax.
He found the emails from the East Anglia University, which were back and forth amongst participants admitting that they were doctoring data, ignoring data that didn't further their contention that humanity is to blame for the climate changing.
They just left it out.
They put other things in that were not true.
And he called here to tell me.
And in the process of talking to him, learned how he found all this stuff out.
I said, you have a computer.
He said, no, my mom does.
And she let me use it a couple times.
But I basically found this stuff all out at the library.
So I said, well, you know what, Alex, would you like an iPad?
Ask your parents.
If your parents will let me, I will give you an iPad because somebody like you could really use one.
It's light.
It's portable.
Battery lasts a long time.
It'd be ideal for somebody like you.
It'd be a great learning tool.
So we put Alex on hold and his parents got on the phone and granted us permission.
And so we sent him an iPad.
I think he should receive it today, right?
What?
You're shaking your head.
So today, thehill.com.
I'm going to read to you a story.
Headline, Rush Limbaugh gives iPad to 13-year-old climate skeptic.
Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh is giving an iPad to a 13-year-old who said he found evidence that human-induced global warming is a hoax through books at a local library.
It was really easy for me to find this evidence.
Really easy, said Alex, who called into Limbaugh's show from Wilmington, Indiana.
I believe the reason the liberals do not have the evidence is because they don't want the evidence.
They don't want to hear that it is wrong.
This is what he said to me.
After Alex told Limbaugh that he went to the local library, Limbaugh replied, I'm surprised you found evidence of this at the library.
That's heartening.
And Limbaugh told Alex that if his parents agreed, he'd send him an iPad.
If there's anybody who would put one of those things to good use, that would be you.
And it's light, it's portable, you can take it anywhere you want to go, Limbaugh said.
After getting permission, nobody was sending the device.
I guarantee you there are people who heard that call.
They're quoting me here in the story.
I guarantee you that there are people who heard that called Alex who want to find out where that library is so they can call and tell the authorities about it.
Here's the last line: The scientific consensus is that the planet is warming and human activities are a major driver, but a very small minority of scientists hold other views.
So they report the story accurately and so forth.
And they go and tell everybody what happened.
And the end of the story, they have to put in this snarky comment that basically implies this kid Alex didn't know what he's talking about.
Whatever he found in the library is wrong.
Limbaugh is promoting a fraud because the scientific consensus is that the planet is warming and human activities are a major driver.
Folks, let me say, just exactly as the news media is no longer about the news.
The Measi is no longer, there aren't any news outlets.
It's just a branch of the Democrat Party.
So is much of science today.
The Democrats have literally politicized everything that they can use to expand government, which is their primary objective.
Whatever they can do to grow government, they will politicize it.
But they'll do it in such a way that Al Roker has no idea.
He is pushing a political movement.
And I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt, but Al Roker could be the biggest, committed, agenda-oriented Democrat in the world.
I don't know.
But my take on it is that he's one of the old useful, he has no idea what he's a tool.
He's a pawn that he thinks he's really helping people to improve their lives with his weather forecast and global warming theories and all that.
I'd be surprised if Al realized that he was part of a political movement being used by one.
But I could be wrong.
So they have to tackle this story, this little 13-year-old Alex, and then imply that not only is he wrong and a kook and a nut, but I'm irresponsible for promoting this kind of stuff because consensus of scientists.
Well, they are all politicized as well.
The global warming scientists are just Democrats, folks.
They all have a political preference.
They're all part of an agenda.
They all believe government ought to get bigger.
That's where they get their money.
It's where they get their funding to study all this stuff.
It's how they buy their car.
It's how they go to the grocery store, government money, grant money.
So they're all part of the agenda.
So I just, I wanted to share that with you.
I thought it was interesting, cute, and funny.
Jeremy Irons.
Jeremy Irons is an actor.
He is starring at present in a Showtime series called The Borgias, which is a great series, by the way.
It is absolutely, I think it's starting season three or season four on Sunday.
It's about Rodrigo Borgia.
He was Pope Alexander XVI or the first or whatever.
I don't remember off the top of my head, but it's about his papacy.
And the Borgia family, by reputation, was one of the earliest corrupt power broker families that ended up running the Catholic Church and the papacy.
But it's a fascinating, well-acted program.
Also, Jeremy Irons appeared one of my all-time favorite movies called Margin Call.
He played the CEO of a Wall Street firm that was modeled after the Lehman Brothers, which was allowed to go out of business rather than be bailed out during the financial crisis in 2008.
But he played Klaus von Bulow in the movie about Dershowitz.
Klaus von Bülow was accused of murdering his wife, Sonny von Bülow, for the money.
Dershowitz defended.
Ron Silver played Dershowitz.
Reversal of Fortune, I guess the name of the movie.
Jeremy Irons is a rock-ribbed libertarian.
And he did an interview in the Huffing and Puffington Post about gay marriage.
And he said that he didn't have a strong feeling either way, but he wondered if allowing same-sex marriage would open the door for a father to marry his son in order to be able to transfer property without paying taxes.
As you know, a spouse inherits with no estate tax being charged.
Husband dies, wife inherits, wife dies, husband inherits, no taxes.
So Jeremy Irons, it seems to me that now we're fighting for the name, you know, the name, the definition.
And I worry that it means somehow we debase or we change what marriage is.
Now, he's on the right track here.
He's talking about how we're bastardizing language.
My old point that, you know, once marriage becomes heteromarriage or obsex marriage, we've lost the debate.
We're willing to change the name.
Well, marriage is marriage.
It equals one thing.
But when we allow for the name change, and that's what he's basically saying here.
So I just worry about that.
We debase or change what marriage is.
I mean, tax-wise, it's an interesting one, he said, because could a father not marry his son?
And Josh Zepps, the host at the Huffing and Puffington Post, said incest laws would prevent that.
You couldn't have a father marry a son because of incest.
And Jeremy Irons said, no, wait a minute, it's not incest between men.
Incest is there to protect us from inbreeding, but men don't breed.
So incest wouldn't cover a father marrying a son because there's no breeding going on there.
So you couldn't possibly have any problem with the birth that would come from that arrangement because there wouldn't be a birth.
Now, if that were so, and then if I wanted to pass on my estate without death taxes, I could marry my son and I could pass my estate on to him.
He said lawyers are going to have a field day with same-sex marriage.
The lawyers are going to have fun like you can't believe.
His point is, we have no idea if this ever does happen in a sweeping nationwide way.
He said, you can't imagine the creativity that's going to be attached to this, and you're not going to believe what marriage becomes.
Jeremy Irons, you really, the Borgias, by the way, this is not for people under 18 or something.
I don't know what anybody misunderstands here.
It's got its share of blood, guts, gore.
Takes place back in the 17th, 16th century.
It's got crazy sex.
I mean, there's nothing redeeming about it in that way, but it is still fascinatingly interesting.
And they keep it as true to what is known historically about Rodrigo Borges as possible.
And he played the CEO named Tulled, which is a takeoff on the real CEO at Lehman Brothers, Dick Fuld, but another great performance in that movie, Margin Call.
That's who he is.
And we got to take a brief break.
We'll get to your phone calls when we come back, so don't go away.
You know what else Jeremy Irons said?
He said, living with another animal, whether it be a husband or a dog, is great.
What a great idea.
Now, folks, if I had said that, the media would just be having a conniption.
Jeremy Irons says it.
They don't even bother to report it.
They really not much widespread reporting on his, you know what, a father could marry his son to avoid estate taxes.
And he said, then your lawyers were waiting.
Creativity here?
Well, you don't know half of what's going to happen here.
Nobody's reporting that.
Huffing and Puffington posted the interview, and it's sitting out there all alone there.
Here is Nick in Charlottesville, Virginia.
I'm glad you called.
I appreciate your patience.
Hey, Rush.
I know you don't like to promote your own products, but I have been a subscriber to 24-7 for 10 years now.
That's my website, folks.
I appreciate that.
Thank you.
Certainly.
And I remember the circumstances from which I subscribed.
I was a junior in college, and I was attending the University of East Anglia on my year abroad.
No kidding.
Yes, sir.
East Anglia is the university where all the climate science hoaxing was discovered, folks.
Okay, go ahead.
Yeah, I just recall the place was a very politically charged college.
It's a university, after all.
And it was the lead up to the Iraq war.
And I just knew I was only getting one side of the story from everything that was happening there.
And I just remembered my youth, my mother, listening to you on the radio and occasionally the TV show.
And I thought, you know what, to get the other side of the story, I need to go look to Rush.
And I found your website, subscribed, and have been subscribing ever since.
That's absolutely.
That is a great story.
I appreciate that.
So there you are at East Anglia.
Where is in England?
Where is East Anglia?
Is it near London?
No, it's just outside of the city of Norwich, which is maybe a two-hour train ride east of London.
It's in the county of Norfolk.
Oh, okay.
Well, so you're out there and you're surrounded by all this leftism, and you went to 24-7.
That is, I can't tell you how happy that makes me.
It's a great endorsement.
And I don't mind talking about stuff.
I mean, I don't mind you doing it.
You're right.
I have trouble talking about my own stuff, but I don't.
That's great.
And I can't thank you enough, Nick.
I really appreciate it.
We got to go, folks.
Back with much more before you know it.
Folks, it's getting a little exciting here on the iPhone.
I don't know when it was, three weeks ago or so, I signed up.
I bought an app from the iOS App Store.
And this app has been so overwhelmingly popular that the people who wrote the app didn't think that they could handle everybody who wanted the app being able to download it and use it at the same time.
So they established essentially a reservation system.
And the reservation system was you buy the app and you are in line.
And you are behind everybody else who bought the app.
Well, when I downloaded the app, I was number 456,000.
And I have been busy monitoring it each day to see where I am.
And as we speak, I am at number 968 for this app.
This morning at a quarter till 9, I was number 7,000.
So it's going at a pretty good clip.
The app's called Mailbox.
And it only works with Gmail right now.
And I don't use Gmail much, but I just, this app is supposedly highfalutin future the way email programs should be.
I want to find out if that's true.
So I'm going to get the app and I'll test some email with Gmail now.
But if you go get it now from the iOS App Store, you'll be at number 153,000.
That's how many people are in line now waiting for it.
I am down to 953.
So I ought to have, ought to be getting an email from these people before the program, even before this hour is up.
And man, I've been counting down here since being in line at number 455,000.
Two weeks or so ago, they announced that they crossed the threshold of 1 million.
It's actually just a slick marketing thing.
You know, they announced this great thing and Intel You, you can't have it yet.
That's all it is.
But I admit it hooked me, you know, because I love this stuff.
Also, I want to mention something.
I should have mentioned this last week.
I don't know, it slipped my mind.
A friend of mine, a very accomplished physician, a well-known surgeon, orthopedic surgeon, told me that his son is part of the management team and ownership team of a website that is aimed at millennials, the age group of millennials.
And his son asked me if I would respond a couple paragraphs to an opinion piece posted by one of the staff members there.
And I said, well, if I get started, one or two paragraphs isn't enough.
He said, well, okay, go ahead and write your own piece then.
So I wrote my own piece.
But then I got a deadline and I didn't have time to really, I had to get it in before I was ready to submit it.
But yeah, I submitted it.
And they posted it.
And of course, it generated all kinds of who is this old guy?
You know, what the hell he's talking about kind of response.
It was funny.
Anyway, the name of the website is policymike.com.
I think it's .com.
Check real quick.
Yep.
Policymike.com.
And I called Coco Jr. today up at my website.
And I said, Coco linked, I sent him a link for my column, my little piece.
I did respond to whatever the piece was that was posted there by the staff member.
And these people are, these are, I'll tell you why I did it.
These are young people, and they are engaged in what's happening to the country.
They are totally immersed in it.
They care deeply.
And I was fascinated.
Find out what they think.
To find out who, if anybody, they're blaming.
I wanted to find out where they thought they fit in all of this, meaning country's future.
I wanted to find out what their expectations were.
And I did a little bit of that, and then I wrote my piece.
And one of the themes of my piece was: hey, don't expect people to listen to you just because you're young and involved and demanding to be heard.
I said, nobody has the right to be heard.
Nobody has the right to be listened to.
I said, you have to make people want to listen to you.
That didn't sit well with some of them.
But, and I said some other things.
I said, look, don't expect me just to get out of the way because you want something.
I mean, I still want to do what I want to do.
If you want what I have, you're going to have to take it from me.
So that was a little bit of a, of course, that didn't sit well with some of them either.
Because it's fascinating.
It's generational stuff.
See, I don't.
Well, what their expectations are, it'd be hard to say that everybody that posts and contributes to this website all want the same thing.
They don't all expect the same thing.
But there's a, I guess, a common ground of they live in America and they believe things are possible and country's in trouble and the old people have screwed it up.
And by gosh, we want what we want before this is all gone and we can't get any, which I totally, by the way, understand.
But as one who doesn't have young kids running around, and I'm therefore not exposed on a daily basis to what they think.
So that's why I said, okay, I'll do this.
So anyway, at rushlinbaugh.com, we've got the link to this website of millennials.
And if you're interested in it, it's a fun thing.
They've had Obama's written a piece for them.
Rand Paul wrote a piece for them after his filibuster.
Barney Frank wrote it.
And you know what?
I know every...
Every politician that's posted has been pandering out the wazoo.
Like Barney Frank says, whatever thing I'm doing, I'm doing for you millennials.
Everybody else, I'm doing it for you.
I'm doing this.
It's fascinating to see these politicians try to get hold of this new demographic.
I'm doing everything I'm doing for you.
And my piece was, I'm not going to do anything for you.
It's up to you to do it for yourself.
And it was fun reading the post to it.
So anyway, Coco Jr. has a link to my column there and then a link to the website in general, policymike.com.
And all it is is a bunch of millennials posting and contributing things on their own website about them and their generation.
And I was asked to contribute to it, so I did.
And I meant to mention this to you last week.
It just totally totally slipped my mind.
Okay, Patricia in Canton, Ohio, as we head back to the phones, the home of the National Football League Hall of Fame.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hi, thank you.
And it's exciting to talk to you.
Hey, I got two points.
The first one is, I want to tell you I love the tea.
Blueberry is my favorite.
Thank you.
You know, mine, too.
I unscrew the bottle cap, and the aroma, it smells like blueberry muffin batter to me.
I just love it.
I put it in the freezer and let it chill.
It gets almost frozen.
It's like a slushy marvelous.
And then I want to say that adding the contest is just an extra perk.
It's really fun.
My second point is: the other day I had a couple people call in and tell about them being on disability.
Well, I worked at the welfare department for 30 years.
And one of the things that came, I believe you mentioned, was you didn't know whether these people planned on being on welfare or they planned on being on disability.
But I have to tell you a little story.
Okay.
I went from receptionist typing to caseworker to legal secretary, and I had kids come in when I'd be interviewing their parents and ask me if when they grew up, would I be their caseworker?
I had them literally.
How long ago?
How long ago?
I've been out 10 years.
I would say probably 20 years ago.
You got to be 20 years ago you had kids of parents coming in saying, will you be my caseworker?
Yes.
How old were these kids?
Like, young?
I'm going to say four or five.
Oh, I wanted to talk to you.
Yeah, four or five.
Would you be my caseworker when I grew up?
I'm not kidding you.
So what did that tell you was going on at home?
That the parents were singing the praises of the caseworkers and all this?
Well, I mean, that, what, that.
They had to be, I mean, they're four or five years old.
What do they know that they have to be told?
Well, yeah, they're told this.
My husband and I fostered for 10 years.
And everyone that came out of the home came out of a home that was on some kind of government assistance.
And usually 90% of them was on everything government assistance.
We had 45 kids through our house, every one of them, welfare.
And that's what they were taught.
Every one of the kids I had in the home had watched Chucky, the movie Chucky, by the time they were four years old.
Okay, you got to tell me.
I haven't seen Chucky, and I know who Chucky is.
Chucky's a little dog that carries a knife and goes around and kills its victims.
Oh, the guy that looks like John Gruden.
Yeah, yeah, coach of the Tampa Book.
Okay, yeah, that guy.
Okay.
Yeah.
So they're programmed.
They know what's going on.
They know when their mom's, their food stamp, back then it was food stamp paper.
They didn't get loaded onto a card back then.
I don't want to make too big a deal of this, but put in context with everything else going on, the fact that four and five-year-olds were asking you if you were going to be their caseworker.
Yes.
Yes.
That meant to them that what their parents was, that was life.
That was a way of life.
You go to the welfare office, and that's how you, then after that, you go to grocery store.
Go to grocery store.
You go and get a car.
You could get a car.
You could get your medical.
You could get a bus pass so you got free trips on the bus.
Oh, another thing I want to tell you, you know how they're getting those navigators out for the Obamacare?
Yeah, wait a minute.
Slow down.
I'm not going to take away your time.
People may not know what this is.
I need to tell about a navy.
60-some odd thousand people, folks, have been hired at up to $50 an hour to fan out across the country, ostensibly to help people navigate their way through the application for Obamacare at a state exchange.
It's an army of Obamaites that are supposedly to help people figure it all out.
What it is, is a massive voter registration drive for the Democrat Party.
Okay, now go ahead.
Well, in the applications, when these people come in and apply and there's an application they have to fill out, in that application is a page dedicated to you signing up to vote and registering you there right there and then when you sign up for your welfare.
There you have it.
That's exactly right.
In the so-called form to fill out and learn how to apply for Obamacare is the application page dedicated to you signing up to vote and registering you right there as a Democrat.
This has been taking place for a long time.
It's in the welfare papers.
Doesn't surprise me a bit.
This has been going on.
It's in a way, folks, this is who these people are.
I mean, that's their life.
They are devoted to owning and operating the government from beginning to end, cradle to grave, your life and theirs.
Now, I have to clarify, I don't know about the navigator page.
I'm telling you about the page in the welfare section.
Right, right.
Okay.
But I'm just well, I don't know either that the navigators are going to be registering people to vote.
I'm guessing, and I'm pretty accurate.
I'm pretty sure I'm right based on what you just said.
I know if a bunch of Democrats are fanning out across the country with a form, it's not just to help people navigate the labyrinth of Obamacare.
I guarantee you, there's going to be voter registration in there.
That's just the way they operate.
Oh, look, Patricia, I'm glad you called.
You go to the Hall of Fame stuff for the football Hall of Fame game every August, or you go out and play.
I go to the Hall of Fame parade, but I have never been inside the Hall of Fame itself.
Yeah, you know what?
People live in New York, have never been to the theater because you can go every day, so you don't go at all.
People live in Washington, never been to the Lincoln Memorial, because they can go every day, so they'll do it next week.
They never get around to it.
By the way, speaking of the NFL, Brendan Ayanbedeo, who is the linebacker, basically special teamer, but the linebacker for the Baltimore Ravens, who, along with Chris Cluey of the Minnesota Vikings, has been leading the charge for gay marriage among NFL players.
Brendan Ayanbedeo actually went to the Supreme Court oral arguments.
He was released by the Ravens this week.
He's 37, and he will admit his better playing days are behind him.
The Ravens released him.
It took him about a day, and he finally said he does think that their partial reason could be his advocacy, his public advocacy for gay marriage, that kind of stuff.
Yeah, football teams don't want that kind of recognition.
Anyway, what Brendan Ayanbedeo said is that he and a bunch of others are working hard to get at least four NFL players to come out, not just one.
It wouldn't be right.
All that pressure on just one player, four Jackie Robinsons instead of just one.
And that's what he said that they're working on.
And he's talked to the player reps.
He's talked to the head of the union, Troy Vincent.
He's working hard here on trying to get a minimum of four NFL players to come out, not just one.
So I can spread the pressure around and make it a little easier on the guys that come out.
By the way, the millennial website, policymike.com, it's M-I-C, policy M-I-C.
We in broadcasting spell the abbreviation for microphone Mike, M-I-C.
We don't say M-I-K-E, so it's policymike, M-I-C.com.
Here's Ron in Pittsburgh.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello, sir.
Hi, Rush.
You know, I was at a wedding down in your neck of the woods, Jupiter, and just about a week or so ago.
And I ran into a friend of mine there who's he's with one of the major accounting and consulting firms.
He was telling me all about his new assignment.
He's been being transferred.
I don't want to tell you the state.
You'll understand why I want to talk about this.
But anyways, he's basically setting up, has a $12 million contract to put together the information for the state that he's working for, under contract paid for by the federal government, to let them know what's going to be involved in them setting up their state insurance exchange.
Wait a minute.
The state is paying a consultant to tell them what they have to do to set up the exchange.
The feds are paying this contract.
Oh, the feds are paying to tell the state what they have to do.
They know what it is that they have to do and blah, blah, blah.
Now, interestingly enough, this is one of 15 states that they have contracted to do this for.
It's a two-year contract.
And he said the biggest problem is the only people that seem to know what's going on are the consultants.
The state doesn't know, and the feds don't know.
So they're sort of making this stuff up as they go along.
That is exactly that.
We were talking about this yesterday.
This is so massive, so complex, that there is nobody who understands it.
It's weird because you think, okay, this stuff is supposed to actually be operational, and some states have already signed up for it.
Well, how could they possibly sign up for something that hasn't even been finished defining yet?
The law mandated they sign up for it by last October, I think.
I think they got an extension to January, February this year, but the law mandated they sign up by then.
Some states said, screw it, we're not signing up at all.
And the federal government has to go in and do those exchanges in those states itself, and they don't know what they're doing either.
It's so big, it's so massive, nobody knows what the law requires.
It's, folks, it's not sustainable.
It's going to collapse, which is not really good.
I mean, it's a mess the people in power are then going to have to fix with yet another health care law.
It's just going to be an absolute disaster.
That's it, folks.
Another exciting hour on the way over to the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum.
It's open line Friday, and much more is coming right up.
▲
Export Selection