All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 30, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:26
October 30, 2012, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 Podcast.
Mitt Romney.
Yesterday in uh is it Avon Lake or Avon Lake, Ohio?
I'll pronounce it both ways because I don't know.
And I don't want to offend anybody who lives there.
He was at a campaign event.
And this is a just a wee bit of what Romney had to say.
I know that early voting has begun.
Get out there and vote.
I see a voter right there.
Get out and vote.
We want you early.
We need you.
It sends a very strong message, by the way.
I mean, I know your vote counts just as much if it's cast on election day as if it's cast early.
But when it's cast early, all the media follows how much early voting is going on.
And they look at your zip code and where you live and make an estimate of whether you're a Republican or a Democrat, and they decide whether we're ahead or we're falling behind.
And we're doing well right now, so early voting makes a difference.
There was a Gallup poll that was released yesterday, and like the Gallup poll that was released the day before, you had to go deep into it to find the nugget.
Remember, a day before yesterday, Gallup had a poll that said 2012 electorate and the 20 2008 electorate practically the same, but they weren't.
When you looked at party identification in 2008, Gallup said the Democrats had a plus 10 turnout advantage.
And they're forecasting a Republican plus one turnout advantage in 2012.
That's a swing of 11 points.
But the headline didn't indicate they had to dig deep.
The latest Gallup release contains the most depressing news for the left that they could hear.
Other than Obama conceding before the election.
And I doubt that that's going to happen.
Gallup is reporting.
Romney is leading Obama in the early vote by seven points, 52 to 45.
The Democrats think early voting is where they win elections.
The Democrats think early voting is where they can get involved in the fraud and maybe have people vote more than one time.
They look at early voting as their advantage.
And that's why Romney in Ohio yesterday, early vote, go ahead, because in Ohio, Romney is also up in early voting.
But overall, nationwide, he's up seven points, 52 to 45.
This is this is I guarantee you sent shock waves throughout Democrat polling groups, the Democrat Party at large, the media at large, and of course the fringe Kook Democrat base.
I cannot stress to you how much weight they put on early voting as an advantage for uh for them.
There's that also uh ladies and gentlemen, Mason Dixon polling has called it for Romney.
They're pulling out.
Mitt Romney pretty much nailed down Florida, said the Mason Dixon polling head, Brad Coker, said the evidence is in the latest polling, Romney carrying the highly coveted I-4 corridor, which is an area that Obama carried in 2008.
He said that quarter, the I-4 corridor, we found Romney leading with 51% Obama at 45%.
Obama also losing support in counties where he is heavily favored.
So this is the second polling unit to pull out of Florida.
The first one, as you recall, Suffolk was the first to pull out.
They they called North Carolina, Florida, and Virginia weeks ago and pulled out and stopped polling.
I believed them from the get-go.
I think I may have been the only one.
It's also, you know how I've been talking to you about Oregon.
I've been slipping in Oregon now and then as these individual states are discussed.
Back in 2008, uh, ladies and gentlemen, Barack Hussein Obama, mm-mm, won the state of Oregon 57 to 41.
Quick mathematics will tell you that he won that state by 16 points.
Today, Barack Obama is at 47% in Oregon.
Mitt Romney at 41%.
That is a huge shift.
And the poll was conducted for a newspaper, the Oregonian.
5741, the BAMSTER won the state in 2008.
It's 4741.
8% undecided.
3% of voters said they would vote for somebody else, and 1% said they wouldn't vote at all in this race.
NPR.
Are you ready for this?
National Public Radio poll, which had Obama leading Romney 51 to 44 four weeks ago, now has Romney up 48 to 47.
That is an eight-point swing.
Are you ready for this?
Mitt Romney has instituted an advertising buy in Philadelphia.
Not just the state of Pennsylvania, but in Philadelphia.
Now, Philadelphia, as uh people that live in Pennsylvania will tell you, or people who have lived, Philadelphia is what gets the Democrats that state.
It used to be that the suburbs in Philadelphia could cancel out all of the minority union traditional Democrat based votes in Philadelphia.
Not so much anymore.
You have to the center part of the state and the western part, the Pittsburgh area, if you'd have a chance, if the Republicans don't have a chance, if Romney's buying advertising in Philadelphia, it means it's in play.
It means that it's in play.
And of course, Bite Me is in Pennsylvania.
Biden is uh uh Minnesota is I think a three-point state right now.
So there's Philadelphia, Romney is buying advertising time in Philadelphia.
But it's I know it is.
It's as blue as is as Los Angeles is.
Maybe bluer uh in in ethnic ways, but regardless, they got the money to spend, and that tells me that uh there's a chance, and they also I I think there may be a little bit of a rope-dope, spend some money in Philadelphia, make Obama spend some time there as well.
Although I don't know if if it's just a trick, Obama and the Democrats are clearly smart enough to realize it's a trick and to not fall for it.
So if Obama, the Democrats are in there, it's because there's a problem.
But buying time in Philadelphia, as opposed to, say, Pittsburgh or Allentown or some other city, but Philadelphia, that's a specific thing.
And of course, again, NPR just a month ago, four weeks ago, NPR had an Obama 51-44, and today it's 48-47 Romney.
The ABC Washington Post daily tracking poll is out, and they've got it dead heat, 49, I think.
4949, and it doesn't matter.
In no case, in no poll is Barack Obama anywhere near 50%.
Well, 49% is near 50%, but he's not at 50.
And even in this ABC Washington Post poll, they say that their respondents expect Obama to lose.
They say that there was they expect their respondents to uh their respondents expect uh uh Romney to win.
Richard Cohen, liberal columnist, Washington Post.
Can I tell you a little story about Richard Cohen?
I mean, I he won't mind, I don't think he'll mind.
Peter Jennings used to be married to somebody.
Uh what was her name?
I think Cottie Martin, I'm not, I'm not sure who it was.
And Richard Cohen and Peter Jennings' wife had an affair.
And Richard Cohen went to Peter Jennings' house and knocked on the door and said, We need to talk about this.
Honestly, that's it's it's famous, it's lower.
Doesn't mean anything.
It just nice little story to tell.
Doesn't attach itself to the story here doesn't mean anything.
Just little biographical information.
Richard Cohen, the Washington Post, a president who does not care, seems not to care.
Is the headline.
The crowds adored Obama, but not as much as he adored himself.
Richard Cohen in this piece, as you read it, realizes, and he says as much, that Obama is a small politically driven president, that he's not at all what was constructed to be.
History was draped over Obama like a cape.
His bona fides, in that sense, were as unimpeachable as Bobby Kennedy's.
The crowd adored Obama, although not as much as I think he adored himself.
Liberals were intolerant of anybody who had doubts.
Obama wasn't a man.
He was a totem.
A single critical column from me during the campaign triggered a fuselade of invective.
The famous and the esteemed told me off.
I was a tool of right-wing haters, a dope of a dupe.
Kennedy had huge causes.
End poverty and the war.
He challenged a sitting president over Vietnam.
It could have cost him his career.
It did cost him his life.
Let's talk about Robert Kennedy here.
The draft is long gone, and with it, indignation about senseless wars.
Poverty persists, but now it is mostly blamed on the poor.
Oh, speaking of that.
I had this in the stack for uh yesterday and didn't get to it.
From the weekly standard, new data compiled by the Republican side of the Senate budget committee shows that last year the United States spent over $60,000 to support welfare programs per each household that is in poverty.
Now we had this last week when it came out.
As usual, you're in a cutting edge if you're here first.
We mentioned the amount of money that we are spending on poverty per capita in this country is enough to wipe it out.
One year.
Not forever, because the new year then starts, and the people who are in poverty are not earning anything themselves, but we we we're spending enough so that there should not be any poverty.
And yet there is.
How is this explained?
The United States spent over $60,000 to support welfare programs for each household that is in poverty.
The calculations are based on data from the Census, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Congressional Research Services.
According to the Census' American Community Survey, the number of households with incomes below the poverty line in 2011 was 16,800,000.
If you divide the total federal and state spending by the number of households with incomes below the poverty line, the average spending per household in poverty, 61,194.
That figure is almost three times the amount the average household on poverty lives on per year, and yet we've still got poverty.
Welfare was meant to bring people below the poverty line to a better place, but it it doesn't, obviously.
And welfare reform had the work requirement in it, and that was reducing the number of people on welfare, but Obama stripped the work requirements out.
He also stripped the work requirements out of the food stamp program, by the way.
That doesn't get a whole lot of discussion, but he did.
The real poverty in this country right now under Obama is the middle class, not classified as poor, not getting a lot of help from the Fed, struggling to keep a roof over their heads.
One in six in this country are in poverty, despite what we're spending.
At some point, when are people gonna get clued in?
The government can't solve these kinds of problems.
Britt Hume had an interesting aside today.
Here we have this big storm in the Northeast.
The big storm has wreaked havoc.
The New York Times has a column.
Big government for a big storm.
Except, guess what?
In the midst of the storm, and now in the aftermath of the storm, the federal government shut down.
Federal government isn't working.
Oh, speaking of which, folks, I predicted it.
I told you it was going to happen.
It wasn't hard.
I predicted it even before Jay Carney's press conference yesterday.
I predicted that there would be media outlets who would urge Obama to move the election.
The president has no power whatsoever to do this.
The president cannot.
The fact that so many people want the president to is alarming because it indicates how many people would be comfortable with that kind of autocratic totalitarian power.
But in our constitutional system, the president has no say.
I hate to tell you this, but the president can't do a thing.
He can go on TV and he can suggest and he can cajole and he can talk about fairness and all that, but he can't do anything.
Constitution sets the terms of the election.
The states determine when the elections are.
The federal government states together.
Congress requires the states inform it of their electors by mid-December.
But the president has no say so in when the election is.com suggesting if the Atlantic Monthly is out, suggesting we move it.
Can't.
It's absolutely silly.
I'd not gonna be surprised if Obama would try to pull it.
Oh guess, you know what the regime's latest campaign tactic is, folks?
Do you know what it is?
I'm really worried.
The Obama advertising is switched now.
And you know what?
Romney.
Romney used to work at Bain Capitol.
That's the regime's campaign thrust today.
Romney worked at Bay C. You know what that means?
It means Romney's rich.
The evil rich guy worked at Bain Capitol.
Must be their big October surprise.
Here's just one sample story on moving the election.
It's from the politico.
The headline, Hurricane Sandy.
Could it push back the election?
FEMA is preparing for Hurricane Sandy to disrupt next week's elections, said the agency administrator Monday afternoon.
Really?
How's FEMA preparing for Hurricane Sanity to disrupt the elections?
What's FEMA got to do with it?
FEMA doesn't even get to do with this.
We uh we're anticipating that based on the storm there could be impacts that would linger into next week and have impacts on the federal elections, said Craig Fugate, the FEMA administrator.
Well, he can he can anticipate all he wants, but FEMA's got nothing to say about this.
Congress sets the date of election.
The states have to get their electors in by the middle of December.
They got 34 days to have their electors vote.
States don't set the election day, the Congress does.
The uniform date for the presidential election is in number three in Title II of the U.S. Code.
Obama doesn't do about it.
FEMA doesn't have anything to say about it.
States can set early voting within limits, but they can't move an election.
Doesn't matter.
Politics doing everything they can.
And getting FEMA involved here, of course, is part of the psychological strategy.
And of course, uh, here's what is this.
Slate magazine.
Could Hurricane Sandy delay the election?
As Hurricane Sandy begins battering the East Coast, Many people, Storm's Path are preparing for days of power outages.
Meanwhile, the pundits are asking how the storm could affect the outcome of the presidential race.
If there are still widespread power outages along the East Coast on November 6th, could the election be postponed?
We hope, we hope, oh, please.
They don't the longer this goes, the worse it's going to get for Obama.
If they were smart, they'd want to move the election up.
But of course that isn't going to help me either, because Romney is leading in the early voting 5245 plus seven.
Are we, folks, are we really such a third-world banana republic?
We can't recover from a storm in a week.
Now we can't.
Remember, there was a so what what kind of a storm took out parts of Maryland and the nation's capital without power for a week.
And I remember being shocked at at that.
Anyway, uh just I just want you to know that there is nothing the president can do legally.
Now he can go on TV and start tugging at heartstrings and uh and talk about fairness and and all of that, but legally, authoritatively, authoritarianly, totalitarianly, as I invent words, he can't do anything about the election.
If he could, he could also cancel it, couldn't he?
He doesn't have that power.
On the cutting edge of societal evolution, Rush Limbaugh serving humanity simply by being here.
That's right.
Just by showing up.
Humanity is served.
Our telephone number, if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882.
I want to go back to this Richard Cohen piece, in which Cohen says that Obama's a small politically driven guy.
small, politically driven president, that he never was what he was made out to be.
The crowd adored Obama, although not as much as I think he adored himself.
Remember John Mecham and Evan Thomas of Newsweek saying, yeah, they were at Grant Park, they were watching Obama on election night 2008.
Boy, this guy's creepy.
You know, it's like it's like he's above all of us.
He's ways up there, and he's watching us watch him.
It's really creepy.
And then they thought, how weird is it you win the election and you send your wife and kids packing so that you're the only guy on the stage.
You don't want your family there.
They're saying this after recommending to all of us that we elect the guy, after helping create the mythology.
That was Obama, and now Richard Cohen coming along.
And Rich, he's he's simply upset because he doesn't think Obama cares.
And I, by the way, if I if I might say so here, I think there are a lot of people.
Well, I know there are, I hear from them.
There are a lot of Democrats, some of them prominent, who really think Obama doesn't want to win.
He's giving them that impression.
They really fear that Obama doesn't have it in it.
He just he doesn't he don't want to go through this.
He doesn't think he should have to.
Elections are for plebes.
He agreed to have to do it one time.
He's not into it.
He really doesn't care.
They're really depressed about it.
A lot of Democrats are.
I think they're a little all wet.
I I think Obama craves being re-elected.
I don't think he likes campaigning.
I think he does think all this is beneath him.
But I don't buy this notion he doesn't want it.
But Richard Cohen says somewhere between the campaign and the White House itself, Obama got lost.
It turned out that he had no cause at all.
Expanding health insurance was Hillary's longtime goal, and even after Obama adopted it, he never argued for it with any fervor.
Well, let me tell you why that is.
It's no different than the stimulus.
Okay, you argue for it, you you get it passed, and then it's done.
And if you in in uh folks, it really is true.
The the liberals create these bubbles of reality, or phony reality as it is, they live in.
So Obama said, I know you this sounds implausible.
It sounds it it sounds irrational.
Nobody would believe this.
I'm telling you, they do.
Remember, these people have theorized all their lives of what they would do if they just got in trouble in power, if they got control.
And they sit around and they whine and moan, everything wrong with America.
Capitalism's horrible, it sucks.
The private sector's filled with cheaters and all that.
And we're the good people.
You put us in charge, it'll all just happen the right way.
So Obama argues for the stimulus, he gets it, and moves on.
And that's supposed to create jobs.
And when it doesn't, a year, yeah and a half later, he's genuinely surprised.
He put all that money in there.
Why did it create jobs?
Well, all the money went sharp, unions and pensions and so forth.
It was all he didn't care.
Health care.
He didn't know the details of it.
He didn't care about the details.
All he knew was the government was going to be in charge.
Period.
To him, that fixes everything.
Government in charge?
Government is us, and we are good people, and we are compassionate and we care, and we know more than anybody else, or we know better than anybody else.
But he didn't know the details of it.
That's why he didn't sell it or argue it, because he didn't.
He he knew the broad themes, but the wonkish details, he didn't care.
At the end of the day, all he wanted was government-run health care.
And then he knew that it was it was organized around eliminating the private sector health insurance market so that in a few short years the only option citizens would have would be getting their health insurance in the government.
That's all he knew.
How we got there, how long it took of secondary concern.
So when when Richard Cohen writes, even after Obama adopted it, he never argued for it with any fervor.
It's because it was done.
After he adopted it, it was done.
Just like all of his jobs programs, all these seminars and workshops in the White House.
You have a two-hour Friday afternoon workshop on jobs.
At the end of it, they report back to Obama, and okay, we've fixed jobs.
And I'm not exaggerating.
They don't have the slightest idea how things really work in the private sector.
They just think government is better.
And everybody in government is better people.
And so you put them in charge of it, it's automatically gonna happen.
Plus, if you add in Obama's own narcissism, I know it all sounds irrational.
Rush, rational people don't think that it takes work.
I know, folks, I know, but can you point to any real work in Obama's life?
And I don't say that trying to be funny or even cutting.
Can you point to any real work?
Not community organizing.
I'm talking about real work with his accomplishment, achievement, being paid, private sector tasks, goals, objectives.
Can you point to it?
Yeah, campaigning's work and so, but it's not.
He's never really had to follow through.
He's all been able to delegate things.
The speaking of which, um, Forbes magazine is out with a couple of little details.
Wisconsin and Ohio, how they're going to be hammered because of Obamacare.
First, uh Wisconsin with the presidential election one week away.
It's worth reviewing how Obamacare will impact the residents of key swing states in Wisconsin, as elsewhere.
Obamacare will drive up the cost of private health coverage, especially for those who buy insurance on their own.
You are the enemy.
If you buy your own health insurance, take care of yourself in the private sector, you have to be targeted, wiped out.
You're you're supposed to get your insurance from an exchange.
And the way they're going to do that is just jack up prices everywhere in the private sector.
And that's what'll happen.
One of Obama's key health care advisors, Jonathan Gruber.
This is an Obama advisor.
This isn't Forbes or some other media speculating.
Obama's key health care advisor, Jonathan Gruber found that by 2016, individual premiums in Wisconsin will go up by an average 30% because of Obamacare.
Now, does he know that?
No.
I really don't think he knows.
And furthermore, I don't think he cares.
Obama cares is magic, okay?
We got government-run health care, and it's going to be he said there's going to reduce everybody's premiums $2,500, and that's what he believes.
He says it, and it is.
He says everybody's going to get covered, and everybody will be covered.
And when it doesn't happen, then some screwed up, it wasn't a bad program.
Something screwed up, we got a new program to fix it.
And that's how government expands and builds on itself, creates a failure, then appoints itself the doctor to fix the problem, creates a new program that just makes everything worse again, and it builds an on and on repeating cycle.
And that's how we end up with redundant programs for poverty, redundant programs on job training and all these other nefarious things.
So the bottom line is Obama's own guy says health insurance premiums in Wisconsin, because of Obamacare will go up 30% in four years.
That's just what's going to happen.
Which means it's going to be more than that if this is what they're copping to.
In addition, Obamacare will deeply cut Medicare advantage for more than 300,000 Wisconsin seasoned citizens enrolled in the program.
27% of Wisconsin doctors say that they will place new or additional limits on accepting Medicare patients because they're not being reimbursed.
They can't make a living.
Well, less coverage, and less treatment.
All because of Obamacare, which the exact opposite is supposed to happen, right?
Everybody's supposed to be covered, everybody's premium is supposed to go down.
When has any government program lowered the cost of anything?
When has the government gotten smaller?
When have there been actual budget cuts?
When does it happen?
Terms of the overall size of the federal budget never gets smaller, does it?
There aren't any real cuts.
My individual line items might get zeroed out, uh, might be cut, rate of growth might be cut, but the overall budget never gets cut.
So here's Obamacare.
But as far as he's concerned, bills passed, it's fixed.
Pelosi, when when Obama signed the health care bill, Pelosi went out smiling as best she could with all the Botox.
She went out, she was smiling, and she just was ecstatic.
Affordable health care for all Americans.
This was after this, she wasn't selling it.
This after it was already signed into law.
With the left, you know, that you you something you don't really know.
They do believe that they are magic.
They do believe that their ideas automatically always work.
And since the purpose of health care in their altruistic minds was to make sure people that weren't covered were covered, and it got cheaper.
That's what they were doing.
Okay, it's signed into law.
That's what's gonna happen.
It's gonna get cheaper and everybody can't get covered.
We're great people.
Affordable health care for all America.
Just the exact opposite, but too late.
That's Wisconsin's moved on to Ohio with the presidential election one week away.
It's worth reviewing how Obamacare will impact the residents of key swing states in Ohio, as elsewhere, Obamacare will drive up the cost of private health coverage, especially for those who buy insurance on their own.
Nonpartisan study found that by 2017, individual premiums in Ohio will increase by as much.
Are you ready for this?
85%.
In addition, Obamacare will deeply cut Medicare advantage for more than 700,000 Ohio seasoned citizens enrolled in the program, and as in Wisconsin, more than 30% of Ohio doctors say that they'll place new or additional limits on accepting Medicare patients.
Individual market premiums, as much as uh an 85% increase in Ohio, 30% increase in Wisconsin, 85% in Ohio.
You say, what's the difference?
Well, the difference is in the Private sector markets in both states and how they're impacted by Obamacare.
But no matter where you go, no matter what state you go to, health care is going to get more expensive because of Obamacare.
And if you doubt that, just ask yourself what what program administered by the federal government has gotten cheaper.
What program administered by the Federal Government has become more efficient?
What federal program are you excited to go meet with the bureaucrats in charge to get whatever deal done?
You know what?
It doesn't exist.
So Richard Cohen says uh after Obama adopted it, he never argued for it.
Because he didn't think he had to.
It was all done.
Magic.
Everybody's going to get covered.
It's going to cost less.
Uh Richard Cohen says it an unfairly mocked campaign speech.
Obama promised to slow the rise of the oceans, began to heal the planet.
When he took office, climate change was abandoned.
Too much trouble, too much opposition.
His eloquence, it turned out, was reserved for campaigning.
This sounds like Cohen actually expected Obama to do something about the rising oceans.
Uh, hello, Hurricane Sandy.
Rising oceans.
Tick, tick, tick.
Don't think anything's been done about that.
At least the way I see it.
Heal the planet?
I don't think anything's been done about that.
And Richard Coe says Obama never espoused a cause bigger than his own survival, believe me.
This is what behind closed doors they're all saying.
They still want him re-elected because it's their credibility on the line, but they know.
The easiest way to explain the amazing cost increases in all these states, Wisconsin and Ohio, though, since they were mentions the mandates.
There are so many mandates on private citizens, on doctors, on insurance companies, the mandates, the federal mandates, the requirements are what and new regulations, but the mandates are the reason the prices are going to be jacked up so high.
And it's all in Obamacare, and it's all admitted to by people who are administering the program.
I mentioned that Romney's buying advertising time in Philadelphia.
And here from the uh what's uh hell, I don't know what the website is, but it's it's a quote doesn't matter.
Uh Fast Eddie Rendell said that a startling upset for Romney is possible in Pennsylvania.
Former governor Ed is he still the governor.
He is a former governor.
Fast Eddie is the former governor.
But when he made these comments last week, he was clearly sending a desperate call to Chicago for help.
Not only, by the way, Minnesota has been moved from safe Obama to lean Obama.
Minnesota has moved.
And the Obama campaign is in Minnesota.
Romney buying ads in Philadelphia.
Fast Eddie says that they're playing defense in Pennsylvania now and that Romney could win.
It's a possibility.
Startling upset.
We got a guy from the Philadelphia suburbs on the phone.
Pardon?
Sorry, Chris, it's a female.
Snerdley smelled your name, look like it's a guy's name.
I have great to have you on the program.
You know, Philly suburbs, right?
Yes.
Thank you, Ross.
I'm honored to be on the phone with you.
I just wanted to say I didn't think I'd ever agree with Fast Eddie, but I definitely think Romney's gonna win Pennsylvania, and I've been saying that for months.
I can't believe he hasn't been here out here sooner because the enthusiasm I see for Rom's is growing every day.
It looks like a s uh truck sign filled with Romney signs exploded on my street.
There's it's literally lined with Romney signs, and I don't see any enthusiasm for Obama.
In fact, I see the opposite.
There isn't it.
I mean, that this is the dirty little secret.
There really isn't any enthusiasm for Obama anywhere.
Uh even even in deep dark blue precincts.
There really any there's just desperation.
There's uh there's praying and there's no enthusiasm.
The guy's been a disappointment.
He's been a letdown.
The the enthusiasm momentum wherever you go really is for Romney.
Yeah, I was at the uh Paul Ryan was here at the rally here and I was um in Westchester.
And I could there are so many people and so many senior citizens.
And I and when you're talking About Medicare Advantage, I think Pennsylvania's got to be one of the states to have the most people that use that program.
And that hasn't been Romney hasn't should uh mention that that's what the Pennsylvania seniors are really going to be hurt by the Medicare Advantage being just going to be totally disallowed or just.
That's going to be the case in every state.
Forbes, I'm sure they'll have a paragraph on Pennsylvania coming up soon.
They just did Ohio and Wisconsin.
But Medicare Advantage is devastating.
The number of seniors that are going to be affected by Obamacare in Wisconsin and Ohio.
Pennsylvania, it's facing some demographic shifts with younger population moving out of the state.
So anyway, well, there you have it on site.
It's anecdotal, but still on site.
Chris in the Philadelphia suburbs sees no Obama enthusiasms offer Romney.
We'll see.
Just telling you what she sees.
We'll be back with much more when we get back.
Don't go away.
Okay, folks, another exciting excursion into broadcast excellence is in the can.
By the way, Obama has canceled campaign events in Ohio tomorrow, third straight day Obama suspended campaign.
Now Muchell and the gang are still sending out fundraising emails, but he's not on the trail.
▲
Export Selection