All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 17, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:41
October 17, 2012, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And we have a new Gallup poll, the daily presidential tracking poll, a rolling average poll, seven days, and Romney is pulling ahead now 51 to 45.
It was 50 to 46 yesterday, now 51.45 in the Gallup Daily Presidential Tracking Poll.
Now, the way I had six points, 45 and 6 would be 51.
That's right.
Notice how quickly I did that.
5145 Gallup Daily Tracking.
Romney up over Obama.
Something happening out there, folks.
And I tell you, by the way, welcome back.
Happy to have you here.
Genuinely happy.
Telephone number, if you want to be on the program, is 800-282-2882.
The email address, lrushbo at EIBNet.com.
Mike, go back.
I just told him Soundbite 8.
Now, go back and grab Soundbite number, what is it?
The focus group, the Romney group, as number one and two.
Just play those back to back.
That we have the Frank Lunt's focus group of undecided voters in Las Vegas last night after the debate.
Many of them had voted Obama in 2008.
So here are these two bites back to back.
Forceful, compassionate, presidential.
Confident and realistic.
Presidential.
Presidential and enthusiastic.
Our next president, dynamo winner.
Steady and articulate.
He's lied about everything.
He lied to get elected in 2008.
That's why I voted for him.
I bought his bull.
And he's lied about everything.
He hasn't come through on anything.
And he's been bullshitting the public with the media behind him.
What I want to do here is make again a point I made in the first hour.
And I guess I do mean to harp on it.
I don't mean to harp on it, but I am.
And I really don't understand the horse race aspect of scoring this debate last night and saying Obama won on points or Obama won on style.
There's no way, folks.
It's simply it isn't possible that Obama won this thing last night.
In the first place, it's not a horse race with both guys starting in a vacuum at the starting line last night with nothing previously in mind to shape people's opinion.
Obama has two standards that he's going to be measured against.
One is the previous debate performance and who he was in 2008.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is crucial here in assessing his performance.
2008, only four years ago, the reason Obama was voted for compared to what he's become is such a deflation.
It is such a huge come down.
Barack Obama is not messianic anymore.
He is not the guy that's going to lower the sea levels.
He's not this empty canvas that people can make him anything they want and people made him out to be superhuman.
Mr. Perfection, he was the answer to every Obama voter's problems.
Well, here we are four years later and he hasn't solved any.
He's only made things worse.
And that debate performance last night has to be measured against that in terms of people are going to vote for Obama again.
That's such a fall from lofty heights, grace, whatever.
But he cannot rekindle the 2008 image that he and his media staff created.
And that's what the people talking about one-on-one points don't get.
This isn't taking place in a self-contained universe where the only reality is last night.
There's a whole bunch of reality that preceded last night that has an impact on the way people view last night, and particularly the way they view Obama.
No matter how he performs in these debates, he will never match the image that was created for him and about him in 2008.
And it's not possible because what was created in 2008 was not real.
It was a pure fantasy.
If I might add, this is what's so damn frustrating for me about 2008.
It was everybody was falling for a fantasy, a fantasy of their own creation.
Whatever people wanted Obama to be, that's what he was.
None of it was real.
This is the real Obama.
The guy who can't put two coherent sentences together without a teleprompter, without stuttering, pausing, rolling his eyes, trying to figure out what comes next, because he goes into a debate with a big burden.
He can't be honest.
Another burden.
He can't promote what's happened.
He can't sell what has happened the last four years.
He's got an almost impossible burden here.
He can't be the guy he was because that wasn't real.
This is the real Obama.
He can't measure up to what he was in 2008.
All Romney's got to do is show up like he did and recite over and over again Obama's record to it.
All he's got to do.
Obama has no answer for it.
And then something else that's happening out there and this lunch focus group, microcosm of it, you listen to these former Obama supporters who are now backing Romney.
They sound the angriest of all.
This is one thing that I don't think I realized till last night watching this group.
One thing that we haven't factored in, maybe you have, but it has, it's, there's a lot of Obama voters who feel betrayed.
There have to be, and we saw the evidence of it last night.
There have to be millions of people.
You stop and think.
People voted for Obama in 2008.
They thought it meant something.
They thought it was real.
They thought there was going to be genuine improvement.
They thought that he was going to do whatever they felt was necessary.
Nothing has improved.
Those people, you heard them in the lunch group.
Some of them, no doubt, are really feeling betrayed.
And I think they are the angriest of all.
And when you say, when I say, when you hear other people say, there's something going on out there, when you see the Gallup poll now with Romney up six and over 50%, we say something going on out there.
What is it?
What it is, is these people.
A lot of Obama voters feel betrayed, feel like they were used, feel like they were lied to, or their intelligence insulted, or whatever.
They voted for this guy because of all the hype and because of all the promises.
Lower health care premiums, you know, it matters to people.
Health care is one of the biggest issues.
It was driving people nuts.
It still is.
The costs of health care are outside most people's ability to afford.
He came along and promised to make it affordable.
He was going to reduce premiums.
He was going to make it available to everybody.
Hasn't happened.
The Hispanics, he was going to make immigration illegal for anybody wanting to come.
It hasn't happened.
There is a huge unreported on amount of anger and betrayal at Obama.
And of course the media is not going to seek it out.
As far as the media is concerned, it doesn't exist.
They don't even think this way.
They can't conceive of people not appreciating or loving Obama because they do.
And they think they're like everybody else.
And they think they have the ability to make everybody else think and see and view things the way they do.
But I think there's a lot of this going on out there.
I think there's a tremendous amount of betrayal.
People that voted for Obama.
And they're the ones catching his lies now because they've, believe me, they know he lied to them.
And they're catching his lies now.
This Benghazi business.
Folks, if Obama won this debate, why all the talk today about Libya?
Why all the talk today about how Obama gave a false answer?
Why all the talk today about how Candy Crowley made a fool of herself if Obama won this?
He didn't on points or any other way.
And there's one more debate to go.
It's a foreign policy debate.
You think this is going to come up maybe and get corrected the next time out?
Maybe Romney will win on points the next time out on this subject.
So Romney just needs to keep doing what he's doing.
Show up, expose Obama's actual record, and he did that four times last night.
Bam, bam, bam, bam, without one aspect of it being refuted.
Because it can't be.
There are 23 million people out of work.
Median family income is down $4,000.
Health insurance premiums are up $2,500.
One out of six million Americans are in poverty.
The unemployment rate total is 15%.
And on and on and on.
47 million Americans are on food stamps.
The national debt is $5 trillion higher than it was when Obama took office.
The national deficit every year is over $1 trillion.
You realize most of the people watching this debate laugh themselves silly when Obama portrays himself as a budget cutter?
When he starts talking about getting a deficit under control, you realize most sensible people who are not scoring this on points listen to this and say, what, what, what?
Romney nailed Obama to the wall on oil, natural gas, and coal.
Obama loves to talk about how all this all drilling going on out there and all the natural gas.
It isn't.
It's happening on private lands where Obama can't shut it down.
He has shut it down on public lands.
It's indisputable.
Obama lied.
How come he wins on points?
He lied and Romney called him on it.
And there's another one, this Arizona immigration law.
That was a big one that he lied about last night.
What?
What are you laughing at in there?
Oh, Snerdley says, oh, they were lies, but they were his best answers.
Okay, that proves that.
So that's, you score Obama, the winner on points.
What a great answer.
They were lies.
Doesn't matter.
They were solid.
They look, what does that prove?
That what comes naturally is lying.
What flows without effort is lying.
Remembering the truth, that takes effort.
And then uttering the truth.
This business about the Arizona immigration law.
Obama said that Romney called the Arizona law a model for the nation.
That was a lie that Romney called him on.
But part of the Arizona lie or law said that law enforcement officers could stop folks because they suspected maybe they looked like they might be undocumented workers and check their papers.
The law actually says law enforcement could not do that.
Obama said Romney supports the Arizona law, and the Arizona law lets people profile.
It does not.
He lied through his teeth, just as Eric Holder said he had not even read the law.
He'd already sued Arizona over all of this.
Obama probably hasn't read it either.
You want to, you know, it was a good lie.
Who says it's a good lie?
Demitty.
People look my okay, so he lied good.
Lied good.
Okay, if see, that is my point.
Snergly shouting at me, the IFB.
Rush, you're missing it.
You're blowing it.
Obama got away with those lie.
He lied good.
He made it believable.
That's see falling into the trap that a lie unrefuted is a point scored, not in a presidential campaign.
People of Arizona know he lied about it.
Everybody involved in the immigration issue knows he lied about it.
He knows he lied about it.
And he's ultimately not going to get away with the lie.
A brief timeout.
We're going to go back to the audio soundbites, and then we're going to get your calls mixed in here, too.
So all that's coming up is don't go anywhere, folks.
You don't want to miss any of this today.
Having more fun than any human being should be allowed to have El Rushball and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Half my brain tied behind my back.
Just to make it fair, I have another question.
Ladies and gentlemen, how does President Obama win any exchange on Libya when there are four dead Americans as a result of grossly inadequate security and protection?
How does he win that?
I know, I know, I know.
They're all saying that Romney let him get away with lying about the terror attack statements of the video, but the audience isn't letting him get away with it.
Ambassador Stevens wrote in his diary about inadequate security.
The State Department turned him down.
The regime blamed a video, a movie, put the movie maker in jail.
Obama blamed the video six times at the UN, sent the UN ambassador out on five television shows in one morning to blame the video.
How does Obama win any exchange when four Americans are dead and a lie has exploded in their faces?
Let's go to the audio soundbites.
What number did I tell you we're starting at?
Number eight.
Forget eight.
To hell with it.
Was this?
It's Candy Crowley walking, Candy Crowley admitting she was wrong.
Get to that later.
Here's the montage of the regime blaming the video for the 9-11 attacks in Libya.
I don't care how offensive this video was, and it was terribly offensive.
And we should shut it.
This video is disgusting and reprehensible.
It appears to have a deeply cynical purpose to denigrate a great religion and to provoke rage.
Let's be clear.
These protests were in reaction to a video that had spread to the region.
You had a video that was released by somebody who lives here, sort of a shadowy character who is an extremely offensive video.
The unrest we've seen has been in reaction to a video.
As a crude and disgusting video, sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.
It was a spontaneous, not a premeditated, response, a direct result of a heinous and offensive video.
I know there are some who ask, why don't we just ban such a video?
And the answer is enshrined in our laws.
Our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech.
That was Obama at the United Nations.
And before that, the voice for it was Susan Rice.
It was spontaneous, not a premeditated response.
Who cares what was said in the Rose Garden?
The bottom line is the regime, Obama, and everybody under his command blamed the video.
But for the sake of truth, Obama did not call this a terror attack in the Rose Garden the day after.
Romney was right.
Candy Crowley has admitted, go ahead, we might as well play it.
Grab sound by day.
It is Candy Crowley last night on CNN.
Anderson Cooper said, Candy, a moment, which obviously now both campaigns will be focusing on.
Tell us your thoughts during that moment when you really, you know, you acted like a replacement ref in the interview.
When you tried to help Obama, Obama asked you to read the transcript and you have the transcript.
Isn't that amazing?
Obama says, check the transcript, and Candy Crowley had it.
Did you notice that in this video?
Obama says that Romney goes out there and says, you didn't call it terrorists.
Is that what's on the record?
You want to say you would call it terrorist?
Chuck the rec.
Check transcript.
He points at Candy, check transcript.
And she, lo and behold, had it.
Shazam.
The president said to the moderator, check the transcript.
And she had it.
She read from it.
And it was a lie.
It was wrong.
And so she walked it back last night.
I knew that the president had said, you know, these acts of terrorist won't stand or whatever the whole quote was.
And I think actually, you know, because right after that, I did turn around and say, but you're totally correct that they spent two weeks telling us this was about a tape and that there was this riot outside the Benghazi consulate, which there wasn't.
So he was right in the main.
I just think he picked the wrong word.
So it's Candy Crowley admitting Romney was right in the main, but picked the wrong word.
What word did he use if it was wrong?
Terror?
Well, doesn't matter.
So I don't think, well, I can't say it doesn't matter.
They're trying to make a big deal out of it.
But what he said in the Rose Garden is irrelevant.
They spent two weeks blaming this video.
Here's Jason Chaffetz, a congressman from Utah, in fact this morning on CNN, a panel discussion about all this.
And I think Candy Crowley is on the panel and Chaffetz said this to her.
I felt like it wasn't necessarily your place to try to be fact-checked or right there.
I happen to think that your assessment of that was wrong.
And so I was a bit frustrated on that particular point.
I think they're great on other parts of it, but I really felt like you have two candidates disagreeing.
It's not the role of the moderator to try to say, well, Mr. President, you're right.
So what Jason Chaffetz was out there saying, ladies and gentlemen, he was getting right in her grill.
Right in her grill.
He was almost giving her an enemy.
It was that close.
Right to her face.
Jason Chaffetz said things to her that most Republicans wouldn't.
So at any rate, they continue talking about it today within the context of Obama won on points.
Oh, I love it.
Obama won on points.
Everybody today, they're going back and reviewing what he said about oil permits and gas permits.
They didn't get that right.
They're going back and looking at Arizona law.
They're going back and looking at gasoline prices.
How about this?
How about this?
This is another thing Catherine pointed out to me.
Did you hear Obama say the reason gasoline prices were low in 2008 was because we were in a recession?
I still haven't figured the economics of that out.
30 minutes ago, I told you that the Gallup poll was out and that it has Romney up now six points.
The daily tracking poll 5145, Romney over Obama.
Now everybody else has got it out there.
Business Insider has it out there.
Three or four people sent it to me.
But we had it 30 minutes ago.
It's a large sample, 2,700 people.
Margin of error, two points, likely voters, gigantic lead.
And yet the media story today, Barack is back.
Yes.
Yes.
So wonderful, beautiful thing.
Yes.
Come back, kid.
Obama won the debate.
Barack is back.
I've got to montage these guys saying, and I'm not going to insult you by playing it.
We're going to go to the phones instead, and we're going to start in Pittsburgh.
This is Craig.
Hello, Craig.
Great to have you here.
Hi.
Good afternoon, Rush.
I think that the Democrats are losing the war on women.
And if you saw more of the lunch last night, he asked two women in the top row why they're still supporting President Obama.
And they both said basically the same answer that they fear losing their rights as women.
And right after that, they gave the mic to a lady in the row right ahead of her who turned around and point blank said to them, Mr. Romney has never said it one word about sending us back to the Stone Ages.
And the rest of the group kind of like, you could hear them like humming and hymen and haw and saying, agreeing with her, like, yeah, they're putting words in his mouth again.
Yeah.
I saw that.
In fact, Cookie, go get that exchange.
Get it from the audio last night.
There were two Obamaites.
They were robots, and they were in the back row, the lunch group.
And they were articulating, you're exactly right.
Romney, Romney is going to take away our contraception.
Romney is going to do it.
All of the mind-numbed war on women drivel that the Democrats have been saying, these two babes repeated it.
And another woman in the lunch focus group turned and looked at him and said, you all are just crazy.
Romney, they're going to take us back to Stone Age.
It was a woman that put them in their place.
And the place did kind of chuckle and erupt.
By the way, Craig, while I've got you, did you happen to see in the debate where Romney happened to say that he had, what was it, a binder filled with women?
Did you hear him say that?
No, I did not.
Well, somebody asked a question about women and are going to be slaves or whatever the hell it was.
And so Romney started explaining how when he got to Massachusetts governor, there weren't any women around.
So he started asking, why can't we find some women applicants?
And somebody brought me a binder full of women.
And people are saying that that was the most insulting comment.
And somebody's going to have to help me understand what's insulting about a binder filled with women.
He then went on to describe his female chief of staff, who he allowed to have a flexible schedule because she wanted to be home at dinner time to feed the kids coming home from school and all that.
But what is this?
Somebody got to help me.
What is offensive about the phrase of binder filled with somebody help me out here?
Everybody's laughing at me, so this may be one I don't get.
Oh, you know, okay, okay, all right, all right.
Look, somebody else mentioned that to me last night.
And I see, there was a time on this program, way, way back.
And by the way, if I were like Obama, I would tell you, well, if I were like Obama, if I were like Obama, I would make somebody else fall on the sword for this, but I never did.
But one of the little inside baseball stuff.
One of the often heard criticisms of talk radio back in the late 80s and 90s when I was starting this show was that it didn't appeal to women.
That women didn't like issues.
They wanted to talk about carrot cake.
I kid you not.
They wanted carrot cake recipes and holiday decorations and that kind of stuff.
The discussion of it.
I said, that's insulting.
I don't believe that women automatically want nothing to do with discussions of substance.
But I had all these wizards of smart and radio saying, no, they don't.
Women don't like this.
They like relationship stuff.
So what we did, we wanted to get more women callers.
And they figured that would create the illusion that more women were listening.
We never had a women problem anyway.
The audience breakdowns always been 55, 45 male, female, which for issues-oriented program was perfect.
It was flawless.
And half of them loved me and half of them hated me.
It was perfect polarization.
Exactly what you're looking for.
Not one of them thought I was boring.
Namby, Pamby.
That's the last thing you want.
That's why I had to learn to take being hated as a sign of success.
You try that and stay psychologically sane.
At any rate, so somebody came up with the idea that I took credit for that.
If you were going to be on this program, you were allowed to call and be on the air.
We had to have a photo of you on file only of women.
We didn't make this rule applicable to men.
Women had to have a photo of themselves on file with us before they could go on the air.
If they called and couldn't establish that a photo we had was of them, they didn't get on.
So we did it.
And we were deluged with photos.
We had women in the nude on the rocks at Mendocino Beach.
We had women in the kitchen.
We had a pictures random gamut.
Snerdley was in heaven.
Snerdley, it was Nirvana.
I was Mario Snerdley back then, and Mario Snerdley was in heaven.
Everybody, but I remember my brother and sister-in-law, Lisa, they're in town from Missouri for the weekend, and we went to the Cafe Carlisle after dinner one night.
It's a nice bar with lounge music.
And soft, demure Lisa practically started screaming at me about requiring women to have she didn't see the humor in it.
I thought it was a great bit.
But she didn't see the humor.
She got so loud that the musicians stopped playing at the Carlisle Lounge.
And they asked us to move to the corner or to leave.
And I got grief from a whole lot of quarters for this.
But we stuck with it for a while.
No, we still don't have the picture.
Mario Snerdley absconded with the photos.
We don't have the pictures anymore.
But what did we do this for?
Two, three weeks?
And anyway, so I got it.
It's a long way around to telling you that I got an email last night from somebody who said, you know, binder filled with women.
It reminded me of when you required women to have a photo on file.
Now, naturally, I didn't put the two together.
Having a binder, Romney asked for some applicants.
They brought him a binder with women's resumes and stuff.
How else?
Want to photos?
Anyway, I think that's grasping at straws to try to make Romney guilty in the war on women.
That's so flimsy.
It was so flimsy.
But anyway, it's a long, long way around telling.
Craig's story is right.
These two women in the Luntz focus group were simply mouthing the mind-numbed robot clichés that Romney was going to take women back to Stone Age, and a woman in the crowd put them in their place.
And the rest of the Luntz focus group appreciated it.
And we'll have that.
I know Cookie's got it.
I had a brief time out.
Craig, thanks for the phone call.
We'll be back.
We will continue after this.
Don't go away.
All right, where is it?
I know that I've got it here simply.
I had a story printed out about the Obama white.
Ah, ah, here it is.
Got it right here.
By the way, Romney asked for that binder.
He asked for a binder worth of qualified and experienced women, which was the key point.
Now, he didn't say resumes, but they're trying to make a gaff out of this, like they tried to make a gaff out of his European trip.
There's no gaffe here.
See, they live in this bubble.
They create this illusion that Republicans hate women.
And so something happens, they have a knee-jerk reaction.
It's a binder fill of qualified, which somehow proves Romney hates women.
It's difficult to keep up with.
And yet again, the truth is that it's Obama who has a workplace that's hostile to women.
You will remember this.
Weekly Standard.
Last night, Obama presented himself as a crusader for women's issues.
Well, what's interesting about this is Obama's own history with women in the workplace.
When one of Obama's debate coaches, Anita Dunn, worked at the White House.
This is what she had to say about her experience there.
Quote, this place would be in court for a hostile workplace because it actually fit all the classic legal requirements for a genuinely hostile workplace to women.
In the same piece, former economic advisor Christina Romer is reported as saying, quote, I felt like a piece of meat.
Christina Romer was the former head of the Council of Economic Advisors.
She said one meeting in which Ron Susskind wrote the piece in the Washington Post that she was boxed out by Lawrence Summers, Larry Summers.
Time magazine called Obama's White House a boys club.
Obama's own staff, mostly made up of men who, as the Washington Free Beacon reported, get paid more than their female counterparts.
So here they are.
Romney hates women, Romney war on women.
The Obama White House is hostile to women.
The Washington Post has had the story.
Time magazine's had the story.
Boys Club, and men are paid more than women.
That's one of the reasons they needed done left.
And how about Obama when Hillary is falling on the sword for him over this Benghazi business?
Well, she works for me.
She's the Secretary of State, and I am the president.
The Secretary of State worked for the United States of America, and I am the United States of America.
I'm the president.
So, once again, the reality is that it's the lib workplace hostile to women, where in their world of perfect utopian theory, it's only us Cro-Magnon troglodyte conservatives that want women back in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant.
I cannot wait till this bunch has been dispatched.
Who's next?
Kathy in Grand Moray, Michigan.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
How are you?
Very, very well.
Thank you so much.
And I did not take offense at the binder comment.
I knew what he was talking about.
I was actually working when we had binders, you know, 30 years ago.
So I didn't take offense at it.
What I told Snerdley, and I'll tell you, I've been a longtime listener.
This is what's happening.
If these two had to start today, okay, from the gunshot and go, Obama would win and Romney could just go home because there would be no point in it.
It took these last four years for him to screw up a cup of coffee, to mess this up so bad.
He's going to be shredded on Monday night on the foreign policy debate.
And, you know, he got a break last night.
I don't care what anyone says, but it took these four years.
Timing is everything in my world, and I'm sure in your world.
But it took these four years for everybody to realize what's going on.
Yeah, that's my point.
He's campaigning.
He's appearing.
Every time he shows in his debate last night, he's got to measure up to two standards, last night and 2008, and what everybody thought of him.
No way, no way, Kathy, can he measure up to what people made him out to be four years ago.
There's nothing he can do to pull that off.
Not after this record, not after this dismal performance.
There's nothing he can do.
He can't recapture the magic of 2008.
Right.
It took these four years for him to prove that he can mess this up.
If these two were starting out today, I would say no way that Romney could even win.
But it took these four years.
Wait, wait, wait.
Just a second.
I want to make sure I understand your thinking on this.
Yeah.
You think side by side, with neither of these guys having a record, that it's an Obama slam dunk?
Well, it is only because the healing of the earth, the parting of the seas, I'm going to give you everything you don't have to, all of the things that he promised four years ago as if he's running for the first time.
Oh, okay.
Well, you're saying, so if he replicated 2008 this time around, I thought you meant if he appeared last night as he was versus Romney as he is, that Obama would run away with it.
I don't think that's true.
No, you're saying he would have to go back and repeat 2008 to Obama.
That's right.
He's proven to everyone that he scammed everybody for four years, and people are upset that they got scammed.
That's exactly right.
That is my point.
You listen to these lunch people.
Don't go away, Kathy.
You listen to these lunch people.
And these former Obama supporters that are now backing Romney, there is a betrayal there.
They feel betrayed by what's happened, and that's not being reported on.
That's not even, I don't even think the drive-bys conceive of that because they don't look at Obama that way.
They don't feel betrayed by Obama.
They don't feel let down.
And so they don't conceive that other Obama.
They think every Obama voter is still in love with a guy like they are.
Kathy, I want to give you a video.
I've got a bunch of videos.
The Dinesh D'Souza movie 2016.
They gave me a bunch of DVDs, and I want to give them away to people in the audience, and I just got them in today.
So if you would like one, and I'll throw in an engraved signature EIB iPad if you want.
You would do that?
Oh, my goodness.
Yes.
Thank you.
Absolutely, I will.
Or you take your pick.
You want, you probably pick the iPad, but I've also got a 15-inch MacBook Pro Retina display loaded computer, laptop, 15-inch.
So take your pick, the iPad or the computer, and the video.
All of them or one of them?
One of them.
I will take your engraved iPad.
Okay.
I got it.
Now, do you want it black or white?
You know what?
I will take it in black.
You'll take it in black.
Do you want ATT or Verizon?
Because this has 4G LTE on it.
ATT.
Okay, ATT black iPad.
We got it.
We have plenty of them back.
And the 2016 video.
I love you.
Thank you so much.
Thank you for calling.
I appreciate it.
She's right on the money.
I love it.
I love it when people see things the way.
Most of you do.
But she's so Obama has this standard of 2008 that, believe me, he's being compared to in every public appearance in that debate last night.
Not just being judged on how he does against Romney last night, but how he is compared to what he was in 2008.
You cannot take that out of the equation.
It's one of the reasons he lost the first debate so badly because he was being compared to what he was in 2008.
Okay, folks, we got to take a brief time out here at the top of the hour.
There are more phone calls from you, obviously, and a few more exciting and enjoyable sound bites to share with you.
And who knows whatever else pops up.
So sit tight, be patient.
▲
Export Selection