All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 8, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:42
October 8, 2012, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
That's a good point.
I haven't heard.
I I asked for a supplemental opinion audit from the Sullivan group because I was I was dead on right about something last week, and I can't haven't heard from him.
So still documented to be almost always right, 99.7% at the time, Rush Limboss serving humanity just by being here.
Happy to have you along.
The telephone number 800 282-288-2, the email address.
L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
They're all upset in the drive-by media that I and Jack Welch.
I should better state that that Jack Welch and I accused the Bureau of Labor Statistics of fudging the unemployment numbers last week.
And we were even cautioned by conservative thinkers over the weekend not to suggest that the numbers were cooked.
Don't go there.
It's dangerous territory.
They begged me and Jack Welch to walk that back.
It was just a statistical anomaly.
Right.
We'll get to that as the uh as the program unfolds.
So the theme, there are two themes.
Now, as we head into the Ryan Biden debate and the next Obama Romney debate, particularly the Obama Romney debate, the two themes that Romney lied, and he just turned in a much greater performance.
Whoa, what a great performance.
That was all over television yesterday.
That's the latest theme.
And in fact, the New York Times today is carrying the theme.
They say that the Obama aides were appalled that Obama didn't say his lines right in the debate.
And that's that's a quote.
It turned out the former was the one who showed up in Denver.
He kept looking down.
He was not using the lines they had practiced, assailing Mitt Romney, who kept the president on the defensive and presented a forceful case against his re-election.
Was not using the lines they had practiced.
You don't need to practice lines.
I know a few people in the Romney camp.
They, at least I was told, expressly decided no zingers, no one-liners, none of that.
This was gonna be a debate of substance.
And that's what it was.
And so now they're saying that Romney turned in a great, great performance and that he lied.
And that Obama screwed up by not calling them any allies because Obama didn't say his lines right.
Now say his lines right, that's something that that's how you would assess an actor's performance.
Advisors had seen two presidents during practice debates.
One who had been listless and passive two nights before, and another energetic and aggressive the next night.
Turned out that the former, the passive, both these are Obama, was the one who showed up.
He kept looking down and not using the lines they had practiced against Romney, who kept the president on the defensive, presented a forceful case against Obama's re-electual.
Who's the actor?
Let's continue now with the sound bites.
CBS reporters.
They're not buying the spin that Obama lost because Romney lied, faced the nation yesterday morning, Bob Schiefer said to Axlrod, what happened?
What happened in the debate?
We set the table for you.
We gave you the 47%.
We pretty much gave you everything you wanted.
We ripped Romney here and there based on everything you told us to do, and then Obama didn't do anything with it.
What the hell happened, David?
Governor Romney showed up to deliver a performance, and he delivered a very good performance.
It was completely unrooted, in fact, it was completely unrooted in the positions he's taken before, and he spent 90 minutes trying to undo two years of uh campaigning on that stage, but he did it very well.
Well are you saying that uh Governor Romney lied or was dishonest?
Well, yeah, I think he was dishonest absolutely.
Would you go so far as to say lied?
Well, I'm not I'm saying that he was dishonest in his uh answers.
You can characterize that any way you want.
These guys can't take it.
They just can't take it that their Little Messiah got his ass whooped.
They cannot take it.
Folks, they just they don't know how to process this.
And so now they're saying in this, you know what Axelrod's saying.
You know, Romney, that wasn't Mitt Romney.
That wasn't a Romney we know.
That wasn't a Romney's been camera.
Right, he lied.
Why, he he had us so confused.
Poor Barack, he didn't know who he was deal dealing with.
He it looked like Mitt Romney over there, but he was saying so many things that weren't right.
Poor Barack, he was the flummoxed.
He was he was almost paralyzed.
He had no idea that he didn't recognize the guy showed up, this guy telling so many lies.
Of course, Romney didn't tell one lie.
There wasn't one lie that Romney told.
He didn't make anything up.
It was that Obama instinctively knew his lies wouldn't work.
If you want to find if you want to know what really happened, I think that's it.
I think Obama instinctively knew here's Romney, forceful, accurate, particularly in the way Romney described Obama's failures.
Particularly in that way.
He laid out every mistake economically Obama's made.
So whatever lines they had, Obama knew he would look and sound foolish if he used them.
And so he tried to carry the day by acting aloof and presidential and above it all, by adopting an attitude of, I don't even need to be here.
This is so beneath me.
What am I doing here?
I'm so bored.
Who is this guy?
I don't even know who he is.
Why am I here?
And it looked much much worse than that.
We continue now, face the nation.
Laura Nora O'Donnell and Axelrod, and and and Nora O'Donnell, by the way, is as upset as she can be.
She's asking Axelrod here why Obama didn't call Romney on all of his lies.
So when you say that he was dishonest and you went through those series of things where you think the that uh Mitt Romney was dishonest, why didn't the president make that point in the debate?
I think he was a little taken aback at the uh at the the brazenness with which Governor Romney walked away from so many uh of the positions on which he's run, walked away from his record.
And I and uh, you know, that's something we're gonna have to make an adjustment for in these uh subsequent debates.
So you admit you were surprised by that, that the president was surprised by that.
So what would he do?
Everybody would be.
I mean, it takes a certain, as President Clinton would say, it takes a certain brass to do what Governor Romney did.
How hard is it, if you really think somebody's lying, how hard is it to deal with it?
How many look at this Barack Obama?
This is the most brilliant, the most qualified.
His light is so bright, we barely can look at him for very long before being blinded.
And he's thrown off his game by a pathological liar.
Why not call the pathological liar on it?
Why not say, Hello, are you Mitt Romney?
You don't I don't recognize the thing you're saying, why?
Just last week you said X it here tonight.
You said I don't know who you are.
Why couldn't he have said that?
If that's true, that would have been a great way to deal with Romney's lies.
You could have called Romney a liar without calling him a liar.
So wait a minute, I don't believe what I'm hearing.
Just last week you said X. Could you show me your birth certificate?
Are you really Mitt Romney?
Well, what a great line that would have been.
Well, that's essentially what they're saying here, isn't it?
That a totally different lying through his teeth, Mitt Romney showed up.
And how did it affect our poor president?
Blindsided.
He's uh paralyzed.
He didn't know how to deal with this.
Come on, a community organizer whose best friends are Louis Farrakhan, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezco doesn't know how to deal with nefarious characters.
Let me tell you something.
What he doesn't know how to deal with here is somebody.
You realize this may be the first time in at least four years that somebody looked at Barack Obama and said, you know what?
You're full of it, pal, and you're ruining this country.
I don't think Obama's used to being opposed or stood up to.
And if he had these magical lines at his disposal, he either forgot them or he realized that they would sound really bad if he used them.
But I think it's more I just, I just I don't think they know what hit him.
I think they live in an alternate universe.
They never face opposition, media, or anywhere else.
The road, speaking of which, is always paved for this guy, wherever he goes, sticking with face the nation.
Here is John Dickerson.
He is the CBS political director, and he and Axelrod ultimately have this little exchange.
When Senator Obama in 2008 said, I'm going to cut the deficit in half.
I'm going to close Gitmo.
A lot of people said those are unrealistic, but they didn't say he wasn't telling the truth.
There's a difference, isn't there?
No, there isn't the difference is that uh closing Gitmo was involved in act of Congress, and he wasn't able to get Congress uh to agree with him on that uh question.
This is basic math.
Come on.
I told you before he was immaculated he was not going to close Gitmo.
I told you that he was not going to purposely lose Iraq.
He was not going to close Gitmo.
What do you what what math, Mr. Axelrod?
For two years, the Republicans couldn't stop Barack Obama on anything.
The Republicans did not have enough votes in the House to stop Obama doing anything.
Illegal immigration, amnesty, health care, you name it, cap and trade, you could have done anything in those first two years.
The Republicans couldn't stop you.
If you'd have wanted to close Gitmo, you could, and by the way, when is Congress stop you guys?
If Congress doesn't do what you like, you do an in run around them on a uh executive order or some such thing.
This is pathetic, folks.
This is really pathetic.
These people now are have they have been exposed.
It's just a question of how many people are seeing it.
But they're being exposed as the frauds that they are, and that they have been from the get go.
Let's take a brief time out.
We'll get some of your phone calls in and we come back here on the EIB network.
Lies.
Romney lied.
That's the narrative.
It's gone on from on high from David Axel.
By the way, can I ask a simple question?
And I've fought this for a long time.
Who is David Axelrod?
Who decided it put it?
This guy is a very sinister looking guy to me.
And yet he's the president.
Do you realize Axelrod is acting as president while Obama campaigns, they're sending Axelrod out to all these TV shows to explain policy.
To explain what Obama has done, what he's gonna do, what he's uh thinking of doing, what he meant to do with the debate, what happened at the debate.
Well, this guy, why should anybody believe what comes out of his mouth?
Who is he?
Has Axelrod been vetted?
Is he clean and pure as the wind-driven snow?
Who is this guy?
This guy's made millions of dollars going on TV and lying for a liar.
They've obviously decided it helps to put him out there, but he's the guy that's concocted this narrative that Romney, great theatrical performance.
Oh yeah.
And that and that Romney lied.
You remember three times Obama in this debate accused Romney of cutting taxes for the rich to the tune of five trillion dollars.
That's as much as Obama has spent, folks.
There's nobody that has ever proposed a tax cut totaling five trillion dollars over whatever time period you can think of.
Obama said it once, Romney refuted it.
Obama said it again, Romney refuted it.
Obama tried it a third time, Romney refuted it, and Obama said, okay.
He gave up.
At that point, he gave up on it.
And this is why, folks, I think Obama didn't use the lines they gave him, because up against Romney, his lines would have looked pathetically weak and would have appeared to be lies themselves, such as the five trillion dollar tax cut.
It was an out and out lie.
Romney wasn't lying about that when he refuted it.
It was Obama who was.
Obama lying, accusing Romney of it.
Finally, after three times, after two times, Romney calls him on it.
Obama backed away.
And he didn't use it again until the next day in Iowa, when there was no chance for anybody to refute it.
The sure sign of a coward.
You notice the next day Obama had no problem with his lines.
The next day at his campaign rally, wherever it was, Denver, Iowa, I don't remember where it was, doesn't matter.
He was out there on prompter again, and he was telling everybody all about these lies that Mitt Romney told the night before, but there wasn't any Romney to refute them.
I'm telling you the reason he didn't use whatever they had prepped him with is because he knew that he would look ridiculous.
Because he knew that what he was going to be saying wasn't true.
And he wasn't going to be able to bring it off because there wasn't a media to prop him up to back him up, and there wasn't a media to go to Romney and say, What do you mean you're going to cut taxes five trillion dollars?
There was none of that.
He had no protection.
Whatsoever.
He was naked up there, for he was all alone and all alone.
Obama can't cut it.
Don't doubt me.
Now, another thing I have maintained for a long time, because I've seen stories on it, that Obama literally doesn't like Romney.
He doesn't like who Romney is.
He doesn't like how Romney became Mitt Romney.
He doesn't like Romney's lifestyle.
He doesn't like anything about Romney or his life.
Romney and the way he's lived his life and the way he's succeeded, acquired his wealth, the things he's accomplished, Obama despises.
Those are the kind of things Obama wants to prevent happening.
He doesn't want people to have that kind of success anymore unless it's ordained from the government.
And in this New York Times story, I have it here, my formerly nicotine stained fingers.
In this same New York Times story where they talk about Obama refusing to use his lines, and they're puzzling over that.
Why didn't Obama use his lines?
That same article says this quote, Mr. Obama made clear to advisors that he was not happy about debating Mr. Romney, whom he views with disdain.
It was something to endure rather than an opportunity, AIDS.
He didn't want to debate Romney.
He doesn't like Romney.
This was something that he had to endure.
If you would have asked Obama, what was your favorite part of the debate?
He would have said when it ended.
Because he didn't want to be there in the first place.
New York Times says it right here.
He views Romney with disdain.
He doesn't like what Romney represents.
I don't know if it's personal.
He just doesn't like what Romney represents.
Romney personifies in Obama's worldview what's wrong with this country.
He personifies everything about this country that Obama doesn't like.
The wrong people are ending up with all the stuff.
That's how Obama.
I'm not kidding, folks.
I may not want to believe it, but don't doubt me.
I've never been more confident of anything, and I'm confident about a lot.
Lara Logan, CBS News.
You remember two weeks ago, two Sundays ago, CBS 60 Minutes.
She did a story on Afghanistan.
That was the same night as the Univision Show, and I talked about both of us.
This 60 Minutes piece of her is not flattering to Obama at all.
It was about essentially how we're blowing it in Afghanistan.
Well, Chicago Sun Times story by Laura Washington.
Apparently, Lara Logan went into town and made a speech last week at the Better Government Association's annual luncheon.
And it says here that she delivered a provocative speech to about 1,100 influentials from government politics, media, and the legal and corporate arenas.
Such downtown Gatherings are a regular on Chicago's networking circuit.
Her ominous and frightening message was gleaned from years of covering our wars in the Middle East.
She arrived in Chicago on the heels of her September 30th report, the longest war.
It examined the Afghanistan conflict, exposed the perils that still confront America 11 years after 9-11.
That's what the 60 Minutes report that she did was on.
Eleven years later, Lara Logan told 1100 influentials in Chicago last week, quote, they still hate us now more than ever.
The Taliban and Al Qaeda have not been vanquished.
They are coming back.
Lara Logan, CBS News, State Control Media.
She said, I chose this subject because one, I can't stand that there is a major lie being propagated.
The lie is that America's military might has tamed the Taliban.
She said to this group of 1,100 influentials in Chicago last Tuesday, quote.
There's this narrative coming out of Washington for the last two years.
That would be Obama, folks, not Bush.
There's this narrative coming out of Washington for the last two years.
It is driven in part by Taliban apologists who claim that they're just the poor, moderate, gentler, kinder Taliban.
It is such nonsense.
We have not tamed the Taliban.
America's military might has not tamed Al Qaeda.
She says that Al Qaeda and the Taliban haven't been vanquished.
They're coming back, and they're strong, and they hate us as much as ever.
That wasn't supposed to happen.
Remember, they were supposed to love us solely because of Barack Obama.
Let me remind you who Lara Logan is.
And this speech that she gave is devastating, and it's in Obama's hometown.
1100 influentials means 1,100 Democrats of various strides.
And to go out and tell these people that essentially our Middle Eastern policy is a lie and is not working.
It's a disaster.
Claiming to leave in victory.
They hate us as much as ever.
They haven't been vanquished.
That's why they had to blame the video tape.
Because with Osama's death, the Al-Qaeda was supposed to have been summarily dealt with as well.
But Lara Logan was raped in Tariri Square during the Arab Spring.
You may remember this now that I bring it to your attention.
She was gang raped by the democracy-loving protesters, the Arab Spring.
And Lara Logan has learned the hard way who's involved in the Arab Spring.
And it wasn't an outbreak of democracy.
It was not at all an outbreak of an extension of Obama's 2008 campaign.
And the drive-bys basically covered up the rape of Lara Logan.
They talked about it, but they didn't spend any time being outraged by it.
How could this possibly happen?
They had to acknowledge it, but they didn't, they didn't offer the details that were later learned.
She was gang raped by these people, and she talks about she still suffers nightmares and this kind of thing because she was eventually flown to Washington.
She spent four days in the hospital being treated for internal tearing and so forth.
It was a really, really violent thing among the people that her compatriots in the media were trying to sell us as the next version of us.
I mean, they were just democracy lovers.
She said that she's speaking out to help end the code of silence surrounding sex assaults on female journalists in that part Of the world and about our foreign policy being mischaracterized in general.
And she is at CBS, state control media.
Okay, here's the phones in Philadelphia.
We're starting with Josh.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Great to have you with us.
And how about that Michael Vick?
Oh, Michael Vick, yeah, what are you gonna do?
He's al he's as overrated as the president.
You're good.
I threw that out.
This caller had no idea I was going to mention Michael Vick.
And you dealt with that expertly, sir.
Congratulations.
Thank you.
Uh Rush, it's a pleasure to speak to you.
I'm an avid listener.
I've read several of your books, and I greatly appreciate you taking the phone call.
Um last night and this afternoon with uh Mr. Romney's foreign policy.
Man was right on the money, did his homework, knows what he's talking about, and certainly has more experience than the uh neophyte who's currently occupying the White House.
Let me ask you a question, Josh.
Sure.
I know you're in the tank for Romney, and I don't blame you.
I'm glad to hear it, in fact.
But when you heard Romney speaking about American foreign policy, America's position in the world, did it did was it as striking to you as it was to me compared to what we hear from Obama?
I mean, here we had somebody speaking of this country as the solution to the world's problems, somebody who understands America's role in the world in terms of leadership.
Um it was it was I heard somebody speak of this country and the necessity around the world for this country, the way we always used to hear presidents talk about it, and the contrast in listening to way to the way Romney spoke about this country the way Obama does when it comes to foreign policy couldn't have been more different to me.
It was striking.
Did it hit you the same way?
I don't mean to lead the witness here.
You feel free to tell me no if you disagree with me.
I couldn't agree with you more.
You know, when every time I hear him speak, Mr. Obama, that is, I think of Neville Chamberlain.
You know, that the man's nothing more than an appeaser.
When Romney made reference to a strong military is as um to a bait uh evil and terrorism and so on and so forth, you know.
Um I think Reagan said it best.
He said peace through strength.
And Mr. Obama goes around bowing to foreign dignitaries.
Come on.
You know, I know.
Well, the basic the basic problem is that Obama considers the United States the problem in the world.
And that's why I mean you know, there are people now saying that we're exaggerating, or those of us who reference Obama's apologies, he didn't really apologize that much.
This is something the right wing has concocted.
He didn't really apologize.
The hell he didn't.
And he's not the only one.
Bill Clinton is apologized for racism and all kinds of other things.
Bill Bill Clinton apologized for not stopping the genocide in uh in Rwanda.
Democrats do it all the time, and they do it at the expense of U.S. foreign policy.
They do it for votes here.
They do it to pander to special interest groups in this country.
Now you don't think it's serious.
Obama's base considers this country guilty in terms of uh in terms of foreign policy.
Josh, thanks much.
David Gilbert, Arizona.
Hello, and welcome to EIB Network.
Hi, Russ.
Thanks for taking my call today.
Um I wanted to ask you um uh what you thought would be the political fallout from the attack in Benghazi, um, or what effect it would have on Hillary Clinton, her future run in politics.
As in if Hillary someday wanted to be president, and then a future opponent tied her to the Benghazi attack years from now, would it have damaging effect on her?
Yeah.
Depends on with who.
I I again uh among the Democrats, no.
Folks, look let me let me go out on the limb here, and I could be all wet, though I doubt it.
But I think all this talk of Hillary Clinton in 2016 or whenever is a pipe dream and wishful thinking.
If Romney wins this election, now's some big ifs here.
But if Romney wins this election and then follows through and does straighten this place out, she doesn't have a prayer.
You talk about overrated.
Would somebody explain to me just why Hillary Clinton exists in presidential talk?
I've explained this to you people.
No, no, no, no, no.
Snerdley, you fall for too much.
Snartley just say, because she not Obama and she pragmatic and she's No, no, no, no, no, no.
Hillary Clinton is considered to be presidential timber because it is thought that the Democrat Party owes her whatever she wants for saving her husband's rear end.
Here's the story, folks.
Herein is the answer to the question, why is Hillary Clinton even in all this presidential talk?
The story begins with a commercial break.
I can't start and finish the story before the uh for the break, so let me take our obscene profit time out here.
I'll come back and I'll explain this right after we get back.
So don't go anywhere.
I think that all this talk is Hillary, uh talk of Hillary is rooted in fear.
For some reason there's still a fear of the Clintons.
And by the way, I I uh I jotted down some thoughts on that over the weekend, which I was gonna use them in in conjunction with a discussion of the unemployment numbers and the suggestion that we just accept the new norm.
Unemployment is 7.8%.
That's just that's good as it's ever gonna get.
We should learn to accept that.
I think that actually this is because of Bill Clinton.
You know, make an effort to tie that all together.
But but Hillary Clinton, folks, she puts her pants on one leg at a time, just like all the other guys, there's no reason to be afraid of this woman.
If you ask me, Hillary Clinton ought to be forced to resign.
This Benghazi stuff happens while she's Secretary of State.
All this unrest at our embassy, at our embassy, she runs the embassies and the consulates.
I'm not I'm not trying to protect Obama here, but I I want somebody tell me where is this imminent imminently qualified individual.
Let's go back to the beginning to explain this.
Hillary Clinton was a student at Wellesley or Yale or something.
By the way, she is 65 right now.
In 2016, she will be 69.
Seeking the presidency?
Yes.
and But that's not what I was going to say.
Not gonna say, well, just just it just not just I don't get it.
But go back to Yale.
Go back when Bill and Hillary met.
So much of this just inexplicable.
I mean, you look at Bill, who legend has it, can have anybody.
Right there it doesn't make any sense.
But let's go further.
What did Hillary do?
This is from the standpoint now of America's feminists and from America's liberals.
Hillary Clinton had at that time a reputation as a trailblazer.
Hillary, it was said, could do anything.
She was almost a pre-Obama.
The legend, the image was that she was so smart, so capable, she could write her ticket.
She didn't need a man.
She could be anything she wanted.
But what did she do?
She hitched her wagon to Bill Clinton.
Okay, fine and dandy.
People fall in love and they get married.
And when she hitched her wagon to Bill Clinton, she did two things simultaneously.
She A subordinated her own defined future.
And instead made his future hers.
Followed him everywhere.
And at every step, tried to take over, or a measure of control or power at every step.
But what did she do?
She gave up this life of endless possibility to move to Arkansas.
God.
Arkansas.
Walmart.
Arkansas.
God, she gave up so much.
And then when she got there, what happened?
Bill disrespected her every day.
Jennifer Flowers brought you name it.
Humiliated her in public.
All while he's earning 25 G's a year as the governor, and she's doing a hundred some odd grand at the Rose Law Firm.
She's the breadwinner.
Clinton's running around enjoying his life while she is looking the other way and sticking with him, thereby prolonging his career in Arkansas.
Now I have no problem with Arkansas.
My mother was born there.
These people in the North Arkansas.
It's deliverance.
You might as well be in the sticks running moonshine.
That's what she gave up everything for.
Well, Bill Clinton.
Good old boy.
And he goes down and lives the life that we all know.
But she tags along.
He gets elected governor.
He gets elected president, and she makes his career possible by sticking with him.
But backing him up, forgiving him, permitting all of these discretions to take care, take to take place with impunity.
And I'm telling you, Hillary Clinton exists as a viable Democrat candidate only because she's owed.
She gave up a life she could have defined for herself and subordinated everything to Bill Clinton and then suffered all of that humiliation and all of that embarrassment.
Oh yeah, some bones were thrown her way.
She made some money in the uh in the cattle markets.
She uh ended up on the board at Walmart, made some big money at the Rose Law Firm, got to dabble in real estate with Whitewater, pretend like she was a big guy, and then eventually Clinton gets elected president.
That wouldn't have happened if it weren't for her.
She could have she could have railroaded his career and been done with him, and he'd have never amounted to anything.
She's the one that made the Clinton administration possible.
She's the one, and of course they gave her health care chance to botch that, which she did.
But they still gave her a chance to run it and have it named Hillary Care and all that.
They gave her the bus tour.
She ran the White House, did all this stuff.
She was the power behind the throne because she could have ended Clinton's reign anytime she wanted.
She could have walked out, she could have taken Chelsea, she could have blown the whistle on stuff we still don't know that would have got has gone on, but she didn't do that.
And as such, it isn't complicated, it's her turn now.
Democrat Party owes her.
And she actually was the first Obama, smartest woman in the world.
You remember that from the 90s?
Hillary Clinton, smartest woman in the world.
Nowhere near it.
Total image, total prepackaged buzz.
Total spin.
So now, and now she's really owed, because look what happened to her in 2008.
You realize that was the payoff.
2008 was the payoff, folks.
This was her moment.
It was a fate accomplished, remember?
She was going to be the nominee and she was going to be the president.
Done deal.
And then out of nowhere comes this skinny black guy out of Chicago, and everybody dumps her.
They threw her away.
They threw her over the first chance they got for a fairy tale.
Her own husband called Barack Obama fairy tale.
Her own husband said to Ted Kennedy, Ted, you know, a couple years ago this guy's been fetching us our coffee.
Well, adult beverages for you, Ted.
She didn't know what hit her.
It was I, El Rushpo who came to her rescue in those primaries with Operation Chaos.
It was I and you in this audience who kept her campaign going.
We gave her a final chance at that nomination.
They dumped her after promising her, after she did everything for that party, keeping Bill Clinton in power.
She made the Clinton Global Initiative possible.
She made all these things that the Democrats love and adore about Bill Clinton possible by permitting it.
And then her chance came along, and what'd they do?
They threw her away like yesterday's newspaper.
So of course they're going to keep talk of Hillary present because they owe her.
But folks, if they threw her overboard in 2000, they'll do it for somebody else again.
I don't worry about it.
Fastest three hours in media.
▲
Export Selection