All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 27, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:14
September 27, 2012, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Broadcast engineer busy today.
I give him instructions.
Okay, okay, I got it.
I can hear the tone of the voice.
Well, there's a lot going on out here today, folks.
It's great to have you with us.
Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone telephone number if you want to be on the program 800 282882.
The email address, L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
I'm not kidding.
Starting today, Mitt Romney should take this victim's comment of Obama's.
He's out there saying he doesn't believe this is a nation of victims.
Like Romney does.
Romney never said that the it's it's a floundering campaign.
They're putting words in Romney's mouth, but it's an opportunity now.
Because Obama has just thrown his own philosophy under the bus.
And again, I want to stress he really hasn't done that.
Don't misunderstand.
I don't think Obama all of a sudden now has thrown liberalism away.
That's precisely the point.
He hasn't.
I don't believe that when he talks about hard work taking you where you want.
That's not what he believes in.
That's not that's not good for liberalism.
Liberalism needs victims.
It thrives on them.
Without victims, why would you need a messiah?
So what this indicates to me is that they're grasping at straws.
They're throwing things up against the wall hoping something sticks.
This is not the kind of stuff a campaign does when it thinks it's going to win Ohio by 10 and Pennsylvania by 12 and Florida by 11 or whatever the numbers were yesterday.
And why is Obama in Virginia?
He's got it wrapped up.
Why is he in Ohio?
He's got it wrapped up.
Why is he going to these places?
It's all wrapped up.
Why is he out talking about the NFL strike?
The referee strike.
He's very happy it's been settled.
What's it?
Um I'm not, by the way.
Well, I gotta say, there's a part of me, folks.
It's just football.
And I just get the biggest kick out of watching the media be so ticked off, and I love them on their high.
I I love, I just I love them when they're upset.
I love them.
I just I I just do.
I but I know it had to end at some point.
I knew that it was gonna get settled, but it was fun watching sandlot football.
Well, yeah, I've got sympathy for the Packers, but you I tell you what's gonna happen.
The regular refs are gonna the ID talk to the Seattle Seahawks.
They they think they had a Super Bowl victory taken away from them by the regular refs.
This love affair with the regular is gonna last about five seconds.
And then it's gonna be back to the way.
Here's what Romney needs to do.
Romney needs to get out there and say that the president is wrong.
That there are millions of victims in this country.
Victims of Obama.
Victims of Obama's policies.
There are millions of victims in this country due to Barack Obama.
There are millions of people out of work because of Barack Obama's policy.
If you don't want to say because of Obama, chalk it up to his policies, Mitt.
If you can't, if you if you gotta sugarcoat it, then blame his policies.
Millions, a record number of millions on food stamps because of Obama's policies.
Millions of Americans have lost their homes because of Obama's policies.
Millions of Americans have lost their savings because of Obama's policies.
Millions of Americans are losing their pensions because of Obama's policies.
Millions of Americans don't know it yet, but they're gonna lose their health care thanks to Obama's policies.
It's sitting there, it's on a silver platter.
Obama doesn't believe this victim business.
He needs them.
Liberalism's oriented around as many victims as possible, creating victims.
What the hell is Andrew Flock if not a victim?
Every woman in this country is a victim of what?
The Catholic Church, male oppression, you name it.
They thrive on it.
Every immigrant to this country is a victim.
There isn't a non-conservative individual in this country, according to Democrats, who is not a victim of the basics of this country, victim of the way this country was found.
This country's unfair, unjust in the way it was founded.
That's the way they're oriented.
For Obama to throw that under the bus and try to make people think he's all for hard work, how it's going to be rewarded.
Tell that to people who are in his crosshairs if they succeed.
This nation is full of citizens who have been victimized by the policies of Barack Obama.
And by the way, they were misled.
How many people have voted for Obama thought they were getting postpartisanship?
The end of racism?
The end of disagreements, the country being loved internationally again.
How many people thought the economy was going to be fixed?
How many people thought Republicans and Democrats were going to throw down and disagree, throw down the disagreements and start working together?
How many people thought all this?
You got the economic news out there.
The economy is tanking.
You know, it's kind of hard to reconcile here.
Something, folks.
Rasmussen data here.
Likely voters, according to all the polls this week.
Likely voters think that Romney.
No, no, in Ohio, this is what was remarkable.
Likely voters think that Obama will do better handling the economy than Romney.
How's that possible?
It isn't possible.
The economy is tanking and Obama is surging?
When has that ever happened in American history?
It hasn't.
Maybe FDR.
Special circumstances.
At no other time in our history has the economy tanked and the incumbent president in charge of it all surged.
However, if you go to the Rasmussen poll here, yesterday in the CBS Quinnipiac poll.
They reported gleefully that Obama was viewed now by a vast majority, I forget the exact numbers as being better able to deal with this economy.
It was Obama hands down.
It was easily eight points.
I forget what the exact number was.
Well, here's Rasmussen today.
Forty-three percent expect better economy if Romney wins.
34% say the same for Obama.
Do you realize these pollsters have got to look at Rasmussen every day and want this guy dispatched somehow?
This guy every day, Rasmussen's showing them tied.
If you add leaners, Romney's ahead by two in the Rasmussen poll.
Yet all these other polls are out there saying it's Obama up by eight to ten to eleven to twelve points.
Obama, preferred by the people of this country to handle the economy.
It doesn't happen.
A tanking economy and an incumbent presence president surging.
Now here's Rasmussen.
Likely voters think that Romney will do better than Obama with the economy by nine points.
Do Americans vote their pocketbooks?
Do they care that health insurance premiums are exploding under Obama?
Do they care that the price of gas is doubled under Obama?
They care about unemployment.
Do they care that GDP is moving backwards?
It we're to believe that amidst all of this, Obama is surging?
I'm sorry, I don't.
It doesn't make common sense.
Obama cannot tie Romney to any of this.
I mean, Romney may go out and say things like 47% to a bunch of fundraisers or this and that.
Romney can't be tied in any way to this economy.
Romney has nothing to do with unemployment.
He has nothing to do with the price of gas.
He has nothing to do with anything.
He hadn't been in power.
No matter how hard they try, they cannot tie Romney to any of this.
But you can tie Obama to it.
Health insurance premium skycrocketing.
Exploding.
Price of gas doubled.
Unemployment.
Over 8% for 40 plus months or whatever it is.
Economic growth has stalled out.
And the incumbent is surging.
Doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
But Obama cares, Rush.
Obama cares.
Romney then cares a Republican conservative cold hearted, mean spirited SOB.
Obama cares.
Really?
Where's the evidence of that?
What's Obama done for you?
Oh, take it back.
You know, I asked that question what's Obama done for you?
Let's go to Cleveland, Ohio.
Obama.
You got Obama phone?
Yes, everybody in Cleveland is no minority.
Got Obama phone!
Keep Obama in president, you know?
He gave us a phone.
He gave you a phone.
How do you give you a phone?
You chatten up the very full snapshot social security.
You got low income, you disability.
Okay, what's wrong with Romney again?
Romney!
He sucks!
I don't believe we can get very far with leaders who write off half the nation as a bunch of victims who never take responsibility for their own lives.
And I've got to tell you, as I travel around Ohio and as I look out on this crowd, I don't see a lot of victims.
I see hard work in Ohioans.
That's what I see.
That woman, I think, actually believes that Obama gave her the phone.
I think she.
I think she actually believes it.
So what has Obama done for you?
I asked it yesterday.
He gave her a phone.
And I guarantee you, she thinks that phone is actually from Obama.
She doesn't have the slightest idea that phone's paid for by the taxes with the taxes from everybody else's phone bills.
And she doesn't care.
That phone comes from Obama.
There was, I don't know if there was a Bush phone.
If you know if there was a Bush phone, Bush never took credit for it.
Who's paying her bill?
You know, a phone is one thing.
But then there's the data.
And then there's the usage.
I know, but they have to be using somebody's paying the bill.
Obama's paying the bill.
Exactly.
Obama's paying the bill for everybody.
What a great guy.
Obama gives away the phones he pays everybody's bill.
They probably think they're television sets are from Obama, too, for all we know.
I gotta go to the phones now, folks, just to update you on the phone situation.
We explained all of this this past summer when I first learned of the program.
There are 12 and a half million Americans that have free cell phones.
Twelve and a half million Americans with uh Obama phones.
And they get free cell usage of 250 minutes a month.
That's not all.
You get more free minutes as a bonus if you sign somebody else up.
Somebody else for free.
If if you alert the government to some other victim that needs a free cell phone and the person qualifies, and it's it's obviously not hard to do, then you get bonus minutes in addition to 250.
So if you recruit more dependent people, if you have an Obama phone and you sign up additional people to get an Obama phone, in other words, if you find more dependent people, more victims that Obama claims he doesn't believe in, you get additional minutes.
This government will bonus you for finding more people that they can give telephones to a half million Americans have free cell phones, free Obama phones, and get free cell usage of 250 minutes a month.
I don't I don't know what kind of phones, I don't know with what provider or any of that.
I imagine you get to pick your phone.
Heck if I know.
Here's uh here, Jeremy and Toledo as we started the phones.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Great to have you with us.
Hey, Russ, how are you?
Very good, thank you.
Hey, I gotta tell you, first off, um, I can't begin to express to you what an honor it is to have the opportunity to talk to you after being a listener for over 20 years.
Thank you, sir.
Really very much.
Nor can I express, or will I do I think you'll ever be able to truly understand what everything you have done over the years means to me and millions of people like me, especially in the beginning when there was no place else to go but your show and this forum, be able to talk about the kind of things we talk about here.
Well I I sincerely appreciate that.
I really do.
More more than I have the ability to express.
Thank you very much.
Anyways, Ditto's just wasn't going to cut it, but I wanted to talk to you about um the uh the audio of the lady you were showing uh protesting the Romney event near Cleveland yesterday.
Yeah.
Um I swear to you, I'm ninety five percent certain that was the same lady that was at the Toledo rally, Romney rally that I attended.
Um I attended that yesterday, and when I watched uh local news broadcast in the evening, um they explained very briefly that the protesters that were there apparently were, you know, they were busting them around, chasing Romney around the state.
Even at that, there were only and I counted them, and within two or three there were fifty-five protesters there.
And I guess one of the reasons I wanted to point that out is that's encouraging to me that that's you know, all of the lack of enthusiasm for it's a standard technique, it's a standard tactic.
They do bust these people around.
Now you you this is video, this woman going on about how Obama gave her a phone.
You think it's the same woman you saw in Toledo?
Oh, i it certainly sounded like her, believe me.
I unfortunately had the opportunity to listen to her gaping maw go on and on for several well for quite a while while I was in line.
So let me ask you this.
You live in Ohio, you claim you have fifty-five people being bussed around to protest Romney because if they weren't being bussed around, there wouldn't be any people protesting Romney.
Do you believe that Obama's up ten in that state where you live?
No, I no, as a matter of fact, I've been following the polls very closely and um identified the the very stark difference between Rasmussen and the rest of them that have been following that for quite a while.
And I'm glad I finally heard you say yesterday, because I was trying to call early last week um and and point out the the differences in these polls, you know, likely voters versus registered voters and the polling samples they're using that seem to be way out of whack.
And I guess that what I wanted to point out to you and that I finally heard you say, I believe it was yesterday, is that um you know, one of the reasons they may be doing this is for Obama to hedge his bets against an unfavorable election outcome.
Um, him trying to lay the groundwork to claim voter fraud or something.
Yeah, I I think there's there are two things.
There are two things possible here.
I think one of the and by the way, folks, uh let me explain to you.
Some of this sounds like it'd be wildly conspiratorial.
It's all based on intelligence guided by experience.
I'm not grasping things out of the sky or or or as the cliché goes grasping at straws, this is stuff they've done.
They they try to charge voter fraud in every election.
Hanging Chad's all that number two thousand gore here in Florida, but since it's a standard operating procedure.
Plus, I know these people, and I I really wish that if if everybody, not even everybody, if just I don't know what number, but if so many more people could just see and understand liberalism for what it is, then this would be all over.
I'm no great sage.
I'm no great Nostradamus.
I just know liberals.
And I know that they lie.
I know that they have to lie.
I know that they couldn't get elected promising to do what they are going to do.
You think Obama would have gotten elected if he would have told you any of the policies he actually implemented.
He wouldn't have stood a prayer, even as the first black president.
It would not have happened.
If Obama told you that he had planned this debt, this spending, nationalized health care, if he had told you that, if he had told you it was going to be this massive stimulus, if he would have told you that he wouldn't have cared whether the Republicans played along with him or not.
He wouldn't have seen the light of day.
They can't be honest.
They can't run on their record.
They just they lie.
It's it's no more complicated.
So and they coordinate with the media.
We know that.
That's not a stretch.
It's not even a complaint.
It's a recognition of reality.
So you have all these polls that show Obama running away with it.
If he loses, they've got a built-in excuse to raise their rabble into a fitful protest over the fact the election was stolen.
is something they're entirely capable of doing.
F my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Rush Limbaugh serving humanity.
day.
Simply by showing up behind the golden EIB microphone.
So there's a number of things going on with the polls, folks.
Let's review just quickly.
Some things said yesterday.
One of the reasons that you tout a big lead at the same time early voting begins is to suppress Romney early voters.
Who wants to vote for a loser?
Oh gosh, here we go again.
We really don't have a chance.
They know that so many people in Marside, all I got to do is listen to the average conservative pundit and realize that they're they're mired in negativity and pessimism.
So you you build it up.
You put out a poll that shows it massive uh Obama lead and uh early voting goes on, and so you stoke Obama voters, you depress Romney voters.
You convince the voters that uh your candidate's so far ahead he can't lose, then why waste your vote on a loser?
And thanks to early voting, then the media can skew the polls early on and make the race suddenly tighter in the last weeks for election day to try to preserve their so-called credibility.
But by then, see, I firmly believe the polls are being used right now in a number of ways.
But one, it's a tie-in to early voting to get Obama votes out there.
Suppress Romney votes.
Fundraising, too.
And the third thing is just to be repeat this again to make sure, you look at 2004, and how many John Kerry voters believe the exit polls that showed Kerry winning big, by the way.
Both the first two waves, two o'clock and five o'clock on election day 2004.
John Kerry was looked like was going to be elected president.
And the Libs all bought it, and they were celebrating before the polls closed.
Polls closed, and the real votes started being counted, and the exit polls were horribly wrong.
I mean, it wasn't it wasn't just little bit wrong.
They were horribly wrong.
And the result was that Democrats actually believed the exit polls and thought the real vote was fraudulent and wanted recounts and all kinds of stuff in Ohio.
So it doesn't take great sage to predict here what they do and what they're capable of.
So if you have all these liberals and all these Democrats believing these polls that Obama's up in these swing states by eight to twelve points, and if he loses one or two of them and loses the election, why it's an automatic conclusion.
They're going to think there was voter fraud.
So that's being set up as a possibility, too.
This stuff is their life.
Power, holding it, acquiring it, using it is their life.
It isn't ours.
We want to win so that we can get this stuff out of our lives.
They want to win so that it is everybody's life, meaning government.
And the people who uh who deal with it.
Now, our discussion yesterday reverberated all across the media.
We have some sound bite examples.
Let's go to the five on Fox at five yesterday afternoon during a segment on the polls.
Greg Guttfeld led off.
I want to talk about Rush Limbaugh.
He is talking about how the polls reflect the mindset or the ideology of Democrats and not America as a whole, and then let's take it from there.
The purpose of the people right now, most of them are doing these polls, they're trying to make news not reflect it.
They're advancing an agenda.
They're all Democrats.
They're all liberals.
They just have different jobs.
The polls are the replacement refs.
They're watching like they see certain things, they don't see other things.
They don't call certain things and other things go by.
Bob Beckle next.
No.
They're not all liberal Democrats.
There's plenty of Republican polling firms out there.
Rush ought to stick to what he does very well, which is to be a radio talk show host, not try to second guess pollsters.
Look, you can argue about how these polls are reflected, and some of them have a slight bias one way or slight bias the other.
In the end, most of them turn out to be unbelievably accurate in not only in politics, but in a lot of other things.
The amount of stuff that we depend on for polling is a lot in this country.
In marketing and every other way.
So I think that all these attacks on polls, if you're not doing well in the polls, that's the time you attacks.
Yeah.
Well, we ran through yesterday who ended up being the closest and the most accurate to the outcome in 2008.
It was Rasmussen.
The polls that we were talking about yesterday finished 18th, 19th, and 20th.
They don't get it right.
They try to at the end of the day.
Their last poll, a series of polls last week.
They tried.
That's when their credibility is made.
Nobody remembers the polls today after the election.
although we might this year, there's a good chance we will remember the polls this week after the election.
Okay.
But they don't all get it right.
Some of them are way, way off.
You just don't hear about it because they don't report how bad they were.
They don't report how off they were.
And everybody's moved on.
After the election, none of it matters.
It's not accurate to say that these people are all accurate and that they all get it close or get it right.
They don't.
Dana Perino next on Fox.
One of the complaints about the polls is the sample, and that looking at who came out in 2008 to vote for President Obama will not be the same in 2012.
And so some of the more conservative Republican pollsters are saying they are smoking something if they think it's going to be the same turnout in 2008.
That is not the case, but the polling is using that same model.
And that's their complaint.
That's exactly right.
Nobody believes that the Democrats are going to show up in a plus seven or plus nine or plus eleven majority at the polls November.
It's the Republicans who are energized.
The Democrats are not.
And polling shows that.
So a poll that shows 11% or 9% more Democrats are going to show up to vote than Republicans cannot be believed.
That's not going to happen.
And Rasmussen's party identification survey, most recent, August 31st, shows that it's plus four Republicans nationwide.
Four percent more people identify themselves as Republicans than Democrats.
So this the sampling that you note nobody's using 2010.
Nobody is using the 2010 turnout as their sample.
And that's well, that's right, Mr. Lumbeau, because that was not a presidential rate.
You don't make turnout for off seed and all blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Sure.
We're also going to throw it out because it was a Democrat landslide loss all the way down the ballot.
So we're not dare gonna use that.
Last night, Greta Van Sustran, she had a panel on her show.
Talk about the polls.
Steve Hayes from the Weekly Standard was one.
And uh she said, ignore it.
That's what Rush has to say about these swing state polls.
Rush, right?
Are these polls slanted toward Democrats toward Obama?
Steve, first to you.
Yes, I think they oversampled Democrats.
I don't think there's any question about it.
It would mean a record turnout for President Obama in those states to produce the kinds of results that we saw.
Now, that doesn't mean that these polls are useless.
If there's consistent oversampling inside a poll like the CBS New York Times poll has been pretty consistently over the last three polls, plus eight or nine for Democrats.
So you can see trends inside of that, even if they're oversampling.
Inside the beltway, a brotherhood, a fraternity, and a sorority.
I mean, it's all and they're very rarely will you see those inside the beltway.
Well, I take that back.
The libs inside the beltway will go for the throat of our guys and try to destroy them.
Our guys won't.
There's a mutual respect.
So at the same time you you rip them for having an outright crazy sample.
You then say, well, but there's a reason that they're doing this, so we can see it and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
There's a collegiality that exists.
And of course, I and those of us outside Washington are not taken in by or not sucked into.
So our comments are not softened or filtered.
Here's Michael Crowley.
He is the uh Thomas uh uh Time magazine.
Senior correspondent.
And uh after Stephen Hayes said what you just heard him say, Crowley jumped in.
Polsters want to get it right.
The idea that there's a conspiracy, that they are trying to root for one side, that they're trying to depress one side's turnout, to me it just doesn't make sense.
I just find it impossible to believe.
They want to get it right.
And you know, these polls do suggest a margin that I think is pretty wide.
Yeah.
See, that's the problem.
They said Democrat margin is pretty wide, yet they don't want to get it wrong.
They don't want to suppress the but look at uh Mr. Crowley with with all due respect.
Uh we have seen too much out here.
We see it each and every day.
You do have a vested interest in the outcome of this, tremendously so.
You have no interest in Mitt Romney winning this.
That would be a disappointing thing to you.
The idea that you want to try to portray all you people to do this as uh having no interest in the outcome or interested in getting it right, you're interested in winning.
And you will use what's at your disposal to facilitate victory.
And we see it.
We would be blind not to see it.
So why I say the polls taken, the last poll or last couple of polls taken near the election.
That's where they try to establish their credibility.
Right now, the idea that they wouldn't use their polling data to try to advance an agenda is absurd.
Why would the media polling be any different than media reporting?
Why, the polling companies are sacrosanct, independent, not affected by no.
On the folks, let me on the other hand here, I'm I'm not this isn't sour grapes.
And I'm not I'm not complaining about it.
I'm actually trying to deeply analyze this, try to explain it, because it doesn't make sense.
It doesn't make sense.
I don't know how you arrive at the idea that ten to eleven percent more Democrats are going to turn out to vote than Republicans.
That doesn't make sense to me.
I don't know how you get a result that shows a majority of Americans think Obama is better suited to run the economy than anybody else.
The economy has gone straight south for three and a half years under his watch.
We're we have to believe that people don't blame him.
That he's just a victim himself of previous administrations, and boy, he's really worked hard and he's really tried poor guy.
We really love him.
We hope he does what's the majority sentiment in the country.
That's what they want us to believe.
Just also there's this notion out there that losers and people who think they're losing or know they're losing immediately start constructing excuses way in advance, like blaming it on the polls.
And not what we're doing here.
Because I don't think we're gonna lose.
I think we're watching something profound.
I I've never seen media bias the way it is.
I've never seen a media in the tank the way it is.
I've never seen corruption in the media the way it has been the last three and a half years, not just in this campaign, but the last three and a half years.
I have never seen, even going back to the 2008 campaign.
I've never seen a media go out of its way to not tell the people of this country about one of the two men who wants to be president.
I've never before in my life seen a media go out of its way to keep people from finding out who one of the men who wants to be president really is.
Not to the degree that it happened in 2008.
One more before we go to the break, and this is the managing editor of the Hill.com, Bob Cusack.
Russia has a point.
I don't think that Obama is up double digits in these states because these polls are assuming 2008 turnout for Obama.
Do I think Obama's up in these battlegrounds?
Yes.
Do I think he's up eight, ten, twelve points in these battleground states?
I don't think so.
Okay.
I appreciate that, but I do I still have a question.
I'm just a naturally inquisitive human being.
If you don't believe the polls.
Not up 10 12.
Well, no, not punched, but he's still up.
Why?
Why do you think he's up?
If you don't believe the sample, you think the sample's incorrect.
If you don't believe it's 8, 10, 12, is it two?
Is it three?
Why?
I'm not being critical.
I just did open in the quest.
Why?
Yeah, he's winning.
Not by eight ten twelve, but he's winning.
Really?
Well, why?
How?
What what what's the data on that?
Obama!
You got Obama phone?
Yes!
Everybody in Cleveland!
No minority got Obama phone!
Keep Obama in, President!
You know?
He gave us a phone!
He gave you a phone.
How'd he give you a phone?
You shine up here.
You all full stem shall social security.
You got low income, you disability.
Okay, what's wrong with Romney again?
Romney!
He sucks!
I don't believe we can get very far with leaders who write off half the nation as a bunch of victims who never take responsibility for their own lives.
And I've got to tell you, as I travel around Ohio and as I look out on this crowd, I don't see a lot of victims.
I see hard work in Ohioans.
That's what I see.
During campaign season, you always hear a lot about patriotism.
Well, you know what?
It's time for a new economic patriotism.
An economic patriotism rooted in the belief that growing our economy begins with a strong and thriving middle class.
And I won't pretend that getting there is easy.
The truth is it's gonna take a few more years to solve challenges that we're building up over decades.
Uh-oh.
But I want everybody here to understand our problems can be solved.
Our challenges will be met.
We got everything it takes to succeed.
It's gonna take a few more years, folks.
That's the plan.
That's the economic agenda put forth by Barack.
I don't see any victims out there.
Obama.
It's gonna take a few more years to solve the challenges.
They won't be solved with Barack Obama.
They won't be solved with Obama policies.
Obama policies have gotten us where we are.
We are all victims of Obama.
Redistribution is patriotic, middle class growth in his in his world, a thriving middle class results from income redistribution.
That's his version of a thriving middle class.
And that's what's patriotic.
How does it make you feel?
Because it's taking a few more years.
Remember now, unemployment was supposed to be down at what was it, five and a half percent two years ago because of the stimulus.
And roads and bridges were supposed to have been built all over the place and new schools and all kinds of repair.
All it's gonna take a few more years.
You know why these guys think that Obama's win?
Maybe not by eight, maybe not by ten, maybe not by twelve.
You know why people think uh Obama's winning anyway?
I do.
It's very simple.
It's a simple explanation why these even some people on our side.
Yeah, Obama's winning.
There's a simple reason why.
And I'll tell you in a minute.
Benjamin Netanyahu is delivering his speech at the United Nations General Assembly.
I just tuned into a bit of it here during the break, and it's awesome.
Very, very well done.
Exceptional speech, all about Iran's nuclear weapons and how they differ than the Soviets, for example, in having nuclear weapons and why.
So we got one hour of broadcast excellence remaining, and it's coming sooner than you know, folks.
▲
Export Selection