All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 24, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:44
September 24, 2012, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying because the views expressed by the host, which should be me, are rooted in a daily res uh r uh resentful, relentless, unstoppable pursuit of the truth, and we find it and we proclaim it and they freak, which is fun to do.
Telephone number 800 28282, email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
So Obama says he's not going to meet with Morsi.
The president of Egypt, the uh grand poo of the Muslim Brotherhood.
You know what probably happened?
He probably called Morsi, said, Look, I'll have a lot more flexibility after the election.
Same thing he told Putin.
Well, he told Medvedev to tell Putin.
He said, You tell Morsi I'll have a lot more flexibility after the election.
And probably would hurt me to be seen meeting with you now since I blew off Netanyahu.
So I got to make it look like I'm blowing you off.
And I'll just go on over to the view and hang around with the babes over there.
And uh that's it.
That's one version.
There's another possibility that it wasn't Obama who canceled the meeting with Morsey.
It could well be the other way around.
After all, Obama still hasn't arrested the movie maker.
He still hasn't handed over to blind sheikh, Omar Abdel Rahman.
It could be Morsi who's calling the shots in this relationship.
It's Obama who bows down to these Arab guys.
We did.
He bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia, bows down to these guys.
So it could well be that Morsi is the one uh calling himself.
Morsi Morsi, I've got to have the story somewhere here in a step.
Morsi's out there telling us that we have to change our ways.
If we expect Egypt to like us, we have to change our ways.
And they're saying the same thing in Pakistan.
Similar similar comments are coming out of uh Pakistan in the same the same vein.
So I don't know.
Time will tell.
As for the polling, I you know me.
I I'm distrustful of them.
And I tell you what I have to fight, and I'll be very honest with you.
When a poll is really, really out of whack with what I want to happen, I do have a tendency to disregard it.
And I have to fight that.
To be very honest, if especially I don't I don't believe a poll that shows Obama up seven or eight with a plus thirteen Democrat samples.
I just I just I just throw it out.
Um other polls I have had a tendency, if if if they don't reflect what I sense is going on or what I hope is going on, I disregard them.
And I and that's not good.
I mean, I have to fight that all the time.
But even with all that, I still think these polls right now, both pro and coniented toward pushing agendas than measuring voters.
And I don't know how accurate they are at measuring voters anymore.
I hear these pollsters talk about they only make landline calls and and fewer and fewer people using landlines.
And I look at the samples that these people are using, and sometimes it's not even likely voters, it's registered voters.
And I think all it does is contribute to a roller coaster, emotional roller coaster that isn't healthy.
Emotional roller coasters tend to emphasize the lows, tend to be more affected by the low, by the dip in an emotional roller coaster than you are with the peak.
And I think that's all part of the game to suppress our turnout and to suppress our vote.
Romney's job in this campaign is to turn out his base.
That's what Obama's doing.
And we know who what his base is.
Obama's base, welfare recipients, the redistribution crowd.
He has written off white working class voters.
He has written off so-called rich but successful people.
He's really, he's going for a constituency, the majority of which we would say are underachievers, and he's using class warfare to do it.
And that's who he views his base is, and he's doing everything he can't turn them out.
You know, they're not, they don't look at when Romney said to his donors, there's 47% of the people.
Okay, so that means there's 6% out there that's left.
I don't think Obama's good.
Let me put this way.
Obama and the Democrats are not focusing on the independents.
Obama and the Democrats are not focused on the moderates.
They're focused on getting their base out.
And they're trying to expand that base by forming sympathetic, empathetic alliances with the downtrodden.
And there are a lot of downtrodden because Obama has made them that way via his policies.
More people on food stamps than ever before.
Thank you, Barack Obama.
Is it a coincidence that in 1998 Barack Obama talks about a majority coalition of welfare recipients, and in 2012, I got a record number of Americans on food stamps while he's president?
I don't think it's a coincidence.
So he's he's trying to enlarge the underclass population.
And the Democrats need a permanent underclass, and they need it growing.
That's why they like illegal immigration.
That's why they like amnesty.
They need an ever-growing and solid underclass.
And that's who Obama's going for.
That's who he's trying to turn out.
Romney has got to turn out the conservative base.
Now, some of you might, well, Rush.
The conservative base is going to turn out because of Obama.
I think so too.
I mean, I don't know how many conservatives you talk to them.
You are one of them.
Fit to be tied over what's happening to this country, the direction is being taken.
Is there anything Romney could do to make you sit home?
Snerdley, is there anything?
Is there any mistake Romney could make that make you sit home?
Because it's about stopping Obama and the Democrat Party.
It's about that.
But I still think that it would be helpful if Romney were to focus on the base.
The Tea Party conservatives, get it theological.
Go out and firm them up.
Get them doing more than voting, getting get them working for you.
Posting yard signs, phone banks, getting people out to vote, early voting, whatever.
I know I'm joining the chorus of everybody offering advice.
And I know I don't like anybody telling me how to run this show.
I really get my back up.
People who've never done it start telling me how to do it.
And I'm politicians the same way.
Why should I listen to a bunch of people who've never run for office?
It'd be a reasonable thing for Romney to say.
I've run for office, I've been elected, I know more about this is a business, I know more about what I'm doing than these armchair guys.
So, in a in a sense, I understand that.
Do you realize early voting has already started?
I saw something over the weekend about voter registration, early voting in Ohio being so vastly in Republican favor.
A person told me, telling me about it was shocked.
Something that would never be reported.
This is again according to polling data and just the narratives each day in the media.
When you hear early voting, don't you automatically think that's all Democrats turning out?
You do, don't you?
Admit it.
Because that's the that's the media intention.
That is the narrative.
That's the it's designed to depress you, dispirit you, suppress your vote.
Oh, early vote.
That's you're supposed to hear that and go, oh my God, the Democrats, oh, they're more fired up than I am, or more fired up than we.
And I don't like this emotional roller coaster, and I try not to get on it.
But the early voting has started.
Reporting on polls is the media does, it's a waste of time.
What the Republicans need to work on is not polling and not getting the results you want to polling.
The Republicans need to work on registration and getting out their vote and their early voters and absentees.
Grassroots stuff.
The stuff that the Tea Party people, like at Freedom Watch are doing.
Freedom Works.
They're out there doing this stuff that you never hear about.
There's a lot of this grassroot effort on the Republican or conservative side happening, you never hear about.
When you hear early voting, it's always the assumption, because they always show you.
Look at that.
The pictures that accompany early voting, you look at it, oh, that's all Democrats, and you're supposed to get all depressed and down on the dumps.
Now, let's see here.
Ed Gomez and Brian Neenighber.
This is the battleground poll.
No.
Yeah, battleground poll.
George Washington University Battleground poll.
It's reported on the political.
Republican poll analysis, Romney winning with middle class families.
Huge.
14 points.
It looks like Obama's attempt to crush the middle class, force them onto food stamps, has not been lost on those most immediately affected by Obama's war on prosperity.
It seems that middle class Americans favor Romney over Obama by 14 points.
That is not insignificant.
at all.
14 points in some polls of independence.
Romney is up anywhere from 13 to What's this?
I made a mistake talking about the view.
I we had a drive-by caller who said, no, you there aren't any babes, there's one babe on the view.
You goofed up.
Look, it that's for you to judge on your own, folks.
I'm there are four women, there are five.
There are five women there.
Obama's sandwiched in there in the middle of them.
They were all sitting.
It's okay.
So independence, Romney up 13 to 15 here in the middle class, uh Romney up 14.
So how does it, how does it figure that Obama's leading in some of these polls?
What we're to believe is that the underclass is much larger than the middle class now.
And that is a concern because of Obama's policies.
There's downward mobility in our economy now.
There's downward mobility.
Middle class people are trending downward.
That's and Obama's policies are causing it.
And now he's trying to coalesce them.
Gas prices have doubled since his emaculation.
Pain at the pump felt every time you fill up your tank.
Home values have not recovered.
Obamacare is now going to tax six million middle class Americans in ways that we weren't told about during the whole debate vote and all of that.
That was news last week.
Working Americans, middle class people know that Obama's run up the deficit, and that's going to result in Democrats calling for a value-added tax and a tax increase.
That's it's already being bandied about.
Stephen Moore, Wall Street Journal, was on Fox this morning.
Yeah, we're going to need more tax revenue.
There's no question about it.
So that settled in.
What he was saying, we need more tax revenue by having more workers, which is true.
You broaden the base.
More tax revenue being paid by more people having jobs, not raising rates on people.
So Obama wants to raise rates on people.
We're back to redistribution.
And again, the key to remember about that is you can only do that one time.
You can only wipe people out one time.
Or you can only take 40, 50% of what they earn one time, and they're going to stop working.
So after your first massive redistribution scheme, you're dead in the water.
There isn't going to be any more to redistribute.
Then you have to start borrowing or printing even more.
You go to these coal mine states.
Democrats are becoming Republicans because of Obama.
Working Americans know that you start closing down coal mines like Obama is doing and wants to do more.
And you can say hello, rising electricity rates, which Obama also wants.
Because he wants you using less of it because that will save the planet.
Climate change and so forth.
Here's another one.
This is from Freedom Lighthouse.
And they quote a guy named Jay Coster Coast, I'm not sure he pronounces it, COST at the weekly standard, who put together a chart that shows an historical analysis.
Every president below 50% in mid-September in the Gallup poll has lost the election.
Everyone.
Every president below 50% in the Gallup poll in mid-September has lost.
Well, Obama's at 47% or 46.
And it's beyond mid-September.
And we're talking the Gallup poll.
So what do you make of this?
Well, this could go one of two ways.
Either the trend will continue, or rules are made to be broken.
Records are made to be broken.
Whatever.
Could Obama be the first to disprove this?
Who knows?
This is why you go nuts analyzing this stuff when you really don't know anything.
Because none of these polls actually matter.
The only thing they do is shape public opinion.
That's all they can do.
The polls don't matter.
They don't count.
There's not one poll, not a we're we're not going to determine who the president is based on any of these polls.
Aside from the attitude they create and what impact that might have on voter turnout.
ABC News.
Young African Americans support Obama, but turnout not a guarantee.
Well, of course, who knows what the turnout's going to be right now with anybody.
Nobody knows.
No matter what poll you've got, no matter how many Americans you've asked, you're going to vote on election day.
Doesn't matter what they say today.
Something could happen later today or tomorrow to change their mind.
Dick Morris has a story.
Why the polls understate the Romney vote?
He thinks Romney's up by seven or eight.
He thinks Romney can win this thing by five to eight points.
Jim Messina, Obama campaign.
Forget these na these polls that show or tied.
Those polls are wrong.
We're winning.
Talent on loan from God.
L. Rushball serving humanity, having more fun to human beings should be allowed to have.
We go to Oklahoma City as Dwayne.
Duane, great to have you here, sir.
Hello.
Thank you.
I'm well.
That's wonderful.
Welcome to the program.
I'd like to talk with you about how I feel it's unfair that the richer folks don't pay the richer folks pay lower amounts of taxes than middle class folks.
They do.
Lower amounts of taxes.
Lower percentages.
Lower percentage.
Okay, well, go ahead.
Okay.
Well, um Mitt Romney's a good example.
Uh the last two years he's he's made about 21 million dollars.
Um, plus his Cayman Island accounts.
And he's only paid between 13 and 15 percent taxes.
Do you break the law?
No, we didn't break the law.
Um in fact, um you know, the law was the tax law was primarily uh passed by Bush.
So no, he did not write.
A tax law was pressed, passed primarily by boy.
There's you've seen how big the U.S. tax code is.
One man couldn't possibly have written all that.
Oh, okay.
Um George Bush plus many helpers wrote the tax.
Actually, you know, members of Congress, Republicans, Democrats, lawyers, all kinds of people have written a tax code for years, and it keeps being added to and added to.
And they're all rich guys writing the tax code.
They're all rich guys, Democrats and Republicans writing the tax code.
Okay.
Well, your point they are called the Bush tax cuts for some reason.
The uh the fact is that although your taxes are, I believe not.
Well, but Romney's paying capital gains on most of his income.
It's not it's not earned income.
He's paying capital gains.
And capital gains are not taxed by Social Security, which is the hidden tax.
No, because the reason the capital gains rate's low is because it's the second time that income has been taxed.
It's taxed once when you earn it, then you invest it, and if you if you show a profit, that's the second tax on it.
You've already paid Social Security on it before you get the uh before you put invest it and then get a return on it or not.
But you know what a lot of people are missing here with this Romney business is that the Republicans all said, Mitt, you got to get those tax turns out there.
You gotta get them out there.
You gotta put this issue to bed, Mitt.
And so now he has, and now look.
He hadn't been put to bed.
You can have naysayers, do everything.
That's not the point.
It was never going to be able to put this to bed.
Harry Reed, you know, you ought to be calling Harry Reed, Dwayne.
He's the guy that's got to explain something.
He said Romney hadn't paid any taxes.
And then add Romney's charitable donations to what he's paid in taxes.
Compare that to Biden or Obama, and I ask you who's the more generous man, and who is really the more charitable man, and who really has given up more of his income combined charity and taxes.
And it's Romney by far.
Our buddy uh Dwayne in Oklahoma City.
When it comes to Romney's taxes, Duane, you need to get a new uh talking point or newer talking points now.
The complaint today is that Romney paid too much in taxes to make himself look good.
I kid you not.
And I want to take you back.
I remember when this went when when Harry Reid claimed that he had a source at Bain Capitol that said Romney hadn't paid any taxes at all.
He wouldn't offer any proof.
He said, I've had a second person tell me.
Who?
I'm not telling you, I'm not going to reveal my sources.
I'm a senator.
So that begot a bunch of worry warts on our side going on television saying it's the same crowd.
Mitt, you know, release the taxes and be done with this.
Release them, give them what they want, and put it behind you.
And Romney was right to hold firm.
He said they're not, they don't care about my taxes.
They want reams and reams of documents, look at things, get some numbers, take them out of context, and lie about it.
He was exactly right.
So time passes.
Romney eventually releases some tax returns, and lo and behold, Romney's right.
The left starts picking at them.
And so now that Harry Reid has been exposed as an outright liar.
The meme is that all this time, this is what they want you to believe, that Romney has been fudging his tax returns and finagling it to make it look like he paid more than he had to.
Just to disprove what Harry Reid said.
Now, how many of you have the ability to do?
You file your tax returns for the IRS.
How many of you have the ability to go back in there and change them?
That can't be done.
But there he was yesterday talking about uh let me see if we have.
Well, I might have the soundbite of this.
Let me see.
It's going to take me a while here, folks.
I go through the pages of Axelrod, Axelrod, Axelrod, Axelrod.
Yep, grab some bite number 23.
This is yesterday's on this week with George Stephanopoulos.
And and Axelrod is claiming that Romney didn't pay, or he paid more than he had to in order to make himself look good.
I don't think anybody else would define it as a good week, but it was an enlightening week.
The week began with Governor Romney uh basically slandering 47% of America, saying that they were uh you know hooked on dependency, didn't pay their taxes and so on.
And at the end of the week, we saw him manipulating his own tax returns to try and plump up his portion of uh taxes to 14 percent.
You're talking about uh not taking the charitable deductions.
Not taking the charitable deduction.
The charitable deduction is 35 percent.
Anyway, this is where we've gotten to.
Now the complaint is that's why Duane, when you call an ex show, you gotta get on the talking points that Axarod and the Obama crowd want you on.
Romney didn't pay enough.
And so it's not that Romney didn't pay.
That's that's off the uh charts now.
That's that's gone.
Now it's he didn't pay enough.
Yeah, it's right.
We saw him manipulating his own tax returns to try and plump up his portion of taxes to 14 percent.
Two months ago on your own show, he said that anybody who didn't take the deductions they were owed wasn't qualified to be president.
Well, I guess he's not qualified because that's exactly what he did last week to try and get his number up from nine or ten percent to fourteen percent.
But wait a minute.
It was zero.
We were all operating under the theory that Romney didn't pay any.
That's what Harry Reid said.
Somebody asked Harry Reid about, well, he's been cheating.
He's obviously he's been changing his tax return.
I don't know who can do this.
How do you manipulate your tax returns after the fact?
How does anybody do this?
Romney paid too much?
When did that become a fraud?
I thought the rich people were supposed to pay more.
I thought rich people were supposed to give all their money to Bill Gates or write a bigger check to the government.
Isn't that what's supposed to happen for the rich now?
Yes, it is.
Buffett, all these rich guys are pledging to give their money to Gates and his malaria charity.
Basically by spaghetti uh mosquito nets.
It's called DVT if you're really gonna wipe out malaria, but I find this is hilarious.
We go from Romney didn't pay any to now he didn't pay enough.
Now he had to go in there and finagle and not take the charitable We can't win with these people.
And exactly that was said before Romney released these returns.
Shouldn't he be praised for not taking the charitable deduction?
Shouldn't he be praised for sending money to the government?
We're told the rich ought to either be doing that or giving their money away to charity, Bill Gates or whoever.
The AP headline on this.
Romney gives Democrats support for claim.
He manipulated tax deductions for political purposes.
I'll tell you, uh the the corruption that's taken place in the media.
You know, I was thinking about this the other day.
Is there a lot of people who ask, what would Walter Cronkite think of what the media's become today?
What would Broko authair?
What does Brooke author?
What would John Chancellor think?
They'd be happy as they could be.
This is exactly what they've always wanted.
If Cronkite could have been as open about how radically liberal he was in his day, he would have done it.
What we're seeing here.
This is what you get when the left totally takes over an institution, and they've taken it over at the at the J school level.
Everybody coming out of J school is a dyed-in-the-wool propagandized liberal.
They have they have been indoctrinated, they haven't been educated.
They're just Democrats, liberals with bylines.
In fact, these people, this is what they think normal is.
There is no conservatism.
That's some freak oddity.
Like at the carnival.
It's the same way that Obama has been taught.
The same way he was reared, brought up, mentored, what have you.
The journalism schools have been taken over by the radical left decades ago, years ago.
You can watch these these young editors and reporters coming out.
They're just they're the product of their education.
Pure and simple.
So what would Brokow think?
Brokow's clapping his hands and going right on.
And so would Peter Jennings be, and so would Cronk.
This is what they all were.
There wasn't some golden age of media where there was rampant pure object.
Maybe.
Maybe in World War II.
Maybe.
That was the last war I think the media actually was on America's side rather than hiding behind, well, you know, we can't pick sides for in the media.
I'll never forget.
I'll never Bernard Shaw was over with John Holloman there in the Al-Rashid Hotel.
This is during the first Gulf Wall.
And we started bombing, and they were in a hotel, and the hotel's being targeted, and they're reporting, and they're and they gotta get out of there.
And so they get out of there.
And bring them back home, and the somebody, the CIA wanted to debrief them about the Iraqis, the enemy.
And Bernard says, no.
I'm a journalist.
I can't, I can't divulge what I saw.
I can't pick sides.
And I'm sitting here.
I'm incredulous.
I say, where do you think the library your freedom is, pal?
Where do you think you have the freedom to be a journalist?
It's this country.
First Amendment free speech, you're in a constitutionally protected job.
You don't choose sides.
In other words, you don't care if the Iraqis win this thing, that's fine with you.
And besides, this don't choose sides bunch.
It's a bunch of crap anyway.
They choose sides every day.
For the Democrat Party.
Stacked deck, bunch cheaters.
It is what it is.
Can't choose sides, my rear end.
Shrinking, by the way.
And just I uh but folks, that this is the this is what the J Schools have done.
Brokow's ecstatic.
Brokoff's not embarrassed at MSNBC.
He's jealous that he couldn't have worked there in his day and taken the gloves off.
I never thought I'd say the day when Al Sharpton wishes, or Brokow wishes he could be Al Sharpton, but that day may have arrived.
Strange as it may sound.
So we've gotten to this point now where the AP says Romney gives Democrats support for claim he manipulated tax deductions for political purposes.
What the first claim was he didn't pay any.
Now he's paid too much.
You cannot win, you cannot satisfy these people, and therefore it is a mistake to try unless your objective is to illustrate who they are.
But if you're really trying to please them, if you're really trying to get their approval, if you're really trying to shut them up, you'll never will, and it's it's it's it's it's foolish to try.
Look at the charitable donations.
Romney's taxes are all legit.
Nobody's claiming he broke the law.
They're saying he paid more than he should have.
And again, isn't that what we've been hearing rich people should do?
The patriotic thing to do for crying out loud.
You compare Romney's charitable donations with Biden's or Obama's, and even make allowances for income differences.
The percentages don't lie.
There's no comparison.
The combined amount of money that Romney paid in taxes and gave away.
In other words, the amount of money Romney earned that he let others have, or was forced to pay in taxes, dwarfs what these other so-called big-hearted, truly compassionate, lovers of all mankind type people do.
It's profound It's profound This is it is the height of corruption and I mean I'm sitting here, I'm aghast.
I'm I'm again, I'm in one of those rare moments where I don't have the words to explain what this is.
How you go from accusing him to paying no taxes and breaking the law and committing fraud and all this to paying too much and manipulating tax returns in able to do it.
I've never heard a liberal yet in my life complain about somebody paying too much in taxes or giving too much to charity.
For any reason.
I've never heard it.
The candidates didn't give this kind of money to charity.
They took it from other people and made it look like they were giving the money.
They don't do this.
All these great-hearted, big compassionate liberals never give their own money away, unless it is for tax-deductible reasons, or PR reasons or what have you.
Romney was doing all this when nobody was looking.
And that's the real definition of character.
It's what you do when nobody's paying attention.
It's what you do when nobody's looking.
Biden, when he was candidate for president, I believe, whatever you $995 charity.
Gore won your $235 to charity.
Al Gore.
Your global warming god, Rachel, 235.
Well, you know, Rachel bought Gore's movie to like that, hold it.
I can't continue to tease her about that.
235 bucks to charity.
I mean, people tip their doorman more than that.
So I get an email from a friend of mine after Dwayne from Oklahoma, they say, Rush, how come?
How come these uh these libs never call you and attack Clinton or Obama?
I mean, don't they take tax deductions?
How come nobody's worried about what their tax rates are and how?
There's a good answer for this.
It's a great question.
And there's two answers.
A rich liberals are allowed.
If you are a liberal, you can be as rich as you want.
There won't be any attack on you because it is liberalism that matters.
But just to make sure and for insurance cases or purposes, Clinton nevertheless.
Why do you think Clinton always says, I don't need tax cut?
Rich people like me.
I mean, I don't need what Romney's offering.
I'm happy to pay more tax.
Well, you've just inoculated yourself, then, man.
Fine dandy.
Here's a guy, former president, acknowledging how rich he is, thinking he's not paying enough in taxes.
He's just inoculated himself from criticism.
Why did Warren Buffett and Gates run around talking about we need to give more money to charity?
Uh, I'm I'm gonna give all this money to charity.
Yeah, I think people are undertaxed.
Because they want to keep the hordes away from their money.
Gates, Buffett, these guys don't want the Duanes of Oklahoma City targeting them.
And the way you do that is to claim you be happy to pay more in taxes.
To claim that you don't think you're taxed enough.
And to come out and say, I don't think that there ought to be.
Uh I think that I think we ought to we ought to double the death tax.
In fact, I don't think people ought to be able to keep anything once they die, shouldn't be able to pass it.
You say that, and the Duanes of Oklahoma City will leave you alone.
You can have as big a house and as many houses as you want.
You can have and and and you'll be applauded.
And so when the hordes decide that they're going to start attacking people who have money and go get it from them, they'll leave Gates alone, leave Clinton alone, leave Obama alone.
Because these people, rather than inspiring others to do what they've done, and rather than describe how the creation of wealth propels an economy and thus a society.
Rather than do that, what these guys do is go the liberal route and start talking liberalism, keep people away from their money.
that simple.
In Clinton's case, he's a bit of a braggart, too.
I mean, he wants everybody to know how rich he is.
But there's also a strategy behind it.
You know, if if Romney would come out and say he's not taxed enough, he wouldn't work for him because then, okay, well, then pay more.
I mean, they would they would it folks?
It's liberalism that matters.
Loyal liberal can do anything.
A loyal liberal can blow up the Pentagon for crying out loud and get away with it.
Or try to.
A loyal liberal can get away with anything with other liberals.
As long as that loyal liberal is liberal and attacks conservatives left and right, spouts the right words.
They get away with anything.
No, I don't know that Obama I don't know that Buffett's really liberal.
All I know is that he may be.
I don't know.
All I know is Buffett would not have anywhere near the money he's got if he really, really a card-carrying liberal from the moment he was born.
Liberalism doesn't.
It inherits this kind of wealth, but it doesn't produce it.
I gotta take a brief time out here, my friend.
Sit tight, much more straight ahead when we get back here on the EIB network.
No, it feeds off everybody else.
There's a uh Reuters reporter named, what is his name?
Pedro De Costa.
And he tweeted, so he's deleted the tweet now, but he he deleted that Romney's tax return release was a true sign of desperation.
True sign of desperation.
Romney's tax release, uh tax return release.
And I guess he's now deleted the tweet.
Why?
Why not stand behind that?
Really believe it.
See, most people are not concerned with Rom Romney, what he does with his money.
We're concerned with what Obama is doing with ours.
That's what this is all about.
▲
Export Selection