The views expressed by the host on this show make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying, and I make no excuses for that, because the views expressed by the host on this show are rooted in a daily, relentless, unstoppable pursuit of the truth.
In addition to that, a documented to be almost always right 99.7% of the time.
So there.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program's 800-282-2882.
The email address, lrushbow at eibnet.com.
Here's the story from the Hollywood Reporter.
Shocked.
Hollywood reporters shocked that an anti-Obama movie is doing so well in New York.
It is already the number two grossing documentary of the year.
It's titled 2016 Obama's America.
It's the Dinesh D'Souza movie.
And we have spoken of frequently on this program.
An anti-Obama documentary.
This is from a Hollywood reporter.
An anti-Obama documentary based on conservative author Dinesh D'Souza's book, The Roots of Obama's Rage, will expand nationwide this weekend after doing notable business in select markets across the fruited plain, including in a liberally minded New York City.
Overall, 2016, Obama's America grossed an impressive $1.2 million last weekend as it upped its theater count from 61 to 169 for a total gross of 2 million.
It's the second best showing of the year for a documentary after Bully.
Bully was at 3.2 million.
I saw that.
That does not include nature documentaries like Chimpanzee into the Arctic.
It's already the number 12 political documentary of all time.
That's a market that Michael Moore supposedly has cornered.
But anyway, on Friday, Dinesh's movie will be playing in 1,075 theaters in an aggressive expansion that comes on the eve of the Republican Convention in Tampa, which gets underway August 27th.
Some in Hollywood were stumped by the amount of business the documentary did at the Regal Union Square Stadium 14 in Lower Manhattan, situated in a liberal neighborhood where films from Michael Moore have done huge business.
I'll tell you, it's a fascinating thing to watch.
I told you the story.
Dr. Soule, Dr. Thomas Sowell, he lives in Palo Alto.
And they wouldn't let this movie cross the city limits in the film can, much less in a projection room in a theater.
Dr. Soule had to drive 30 miles to watch it.
The theater he went to was so crowded, he sat in the balcony in the aisle, the only place to sit.
He said the audience was at rapt, full attention.
It explains Obama's motivations.
And for many, it's the first time They are hearing about Obama's views on colonialism, the influence of the mentors in his life, such as his father and a man by the name of Frank Marshall Davis, a noted communist in Hawaii.
And basically, what you come away with, you watch the movie, is that Obama considers himself a global citizen.
Not so much an American citizen, American citizen, too limiting.
He's a global citizen, and he has the global view of America, which essentially is that our wealth and superpower status has not derived from anything special or exceptional about us, that instead what we've done is simply pillaged the rest of the world.
We've stolen resources.
But folks, it's exactly what I've told you from the get-go, that Obama has a chip on his shoulder about this country, that it's illegitimate, it's immoral, its founding was unjust, and it's his role, it's his job to cut this country down to size because that's what this country deserves.
From the perspective of a globalist who sees the world as this giant egalitarian place that ought to be a lot more fair and a lot more equal, but the United States has taken much more than its share.
And it's Obama's job to finally level the playing field.
And not only in a global sphere, but domestically as well.
Obama's view that the country has become great by virtue of pillage, so have the achieved in this country become successful by stealing from fellow citizens, or by cheating them in business, or by screwing them, or just literally taking from them, or not being fair in wages or what have you.
And so it's his job to even it out.
And Soul writes about people watching this, and you can see that the people who are exposed to this explanation for the first time are held at rapt attention.
And the movie is not preachy.
It's not table pounding.
This is the movie where Dinesh went over to Kenya, met with Obama's brother, who lives in a hut.
I told you the story yesterday that George Obama, the brother that lives in a hut, a half-brother of the president of the United States, lives on less than $20 a year.
And it turns out that George, this is a column that Dinesh wrote for Fox News 10 days ago, two Fridays ago.
He said he got a phone call from George Obama.
He said, George Obama was reaching out to Dinesh at a medical emergency.
He needed financial assistance for somebody in the family in this remote village in Kenya where they all live.
And Dinesh said, why are you calling me?
And George Obama is the only guy you know to call.
And Dinesh makes money.
Didn't even call his own brother.
His own brother's the president of the United States, who loves to spout this biblical phrase that we are our brother's keeper.
But, you know, we ought to start a foundation to help this guy called the I Am My Brother's Keeper Foundation.
George Obama, the chief beneficiary, and anybody else named Obama that lives in a hut in, I'm just joking, but My Brother's Keeper could be the name of the foundation.
George lives on $20 a year.
Obama will not help him.
And Dinesh explains why.
Theory is that George doesn't believe the same things Obama politically believes, and so George cast off.
And this is in the movie.
People are watching it.
This is one of these sleeper things.
You know, movies, pop culture, very influential.
A lot of people.
If it happens in a movie, it's real.
And so this is one of these things that's happening, at least in the political sphere, under the radar.
It'll be fascinating to watch.
It's going to open in, well, not open.
It'll play in 1,075 theaters this weekend.
And it's already doing gangbusters in New York and the Hollywood Reporter can't figure it out.
Now, okay, folks, a reminder: 11.59 p.m. Pacific time tonight is the last chance that you will have to go to 2F by Tea and pick up some tea at a reduced price for this sweepsteaks and be entered in the opportunity to win the cruise of a lifetime.
All this election stress going on, and we at 2IF by T figured what could be better than sending you on an escape and not just an in-your-mind escape, like a movie.
I mean, this is a real deal.
Where else, for example, can you experience fine dining, Broadway shows, 3D movies, rock climbing, spa treatments, and more, all in one beautiful location while you are moving?
If you guessed a cruise ship, you're right.
One lucky winner and a friend, we won't ask who, friend or spouse, you'll be sent on Rush Revere's Caribbean cruise aboard one of the world's largest primo creme de la creme cruise ships.
You'll board in Fort Lauderdale.
You'll spend seven nights leisurely cruising the Eastern Caribbean, stopping in places like the Bahamas, St. Thomas, St. Martin.
We sent an advanced team to scout out this ship.
We actually sent somebody on this cruise on this very ship to make sure that it was exactly what we wanted it to be.
And it is fantastic.
Excellence in cruising, as you would expect from us.
Now, while you're on board, all of your meals are covered.
You'll receive $1,500 worth of credits to use as you please while you're on the cruise.
And we know you're not going to drive or take the Hoof Express to Fort Lauderdale to get there.
So we've included two round-trip airline tickets and hotel accommodations in Florida for before and after the cruise.
We've taken care of everything.
All you have to do is win.
And you know the drill.
You simply go to 2ifbytea.com, pick up some of the best tasting iced tea.
This is an added bonus because it really is, if you haven't yet tasted it, it's the best iced tea in this country.
2ifbytea.com.
Now, if you're not the grand prize cruise winner, fear not.
We don't slouch on runner-up prizes.
We got you covered.
There are nine additional winners chosen for first and second prizes.
The first prizes are professionally hand-framed, signed 8x10 photos of me with an engraved iPad, an EIB signature engraved iPad, plus a plaque, including one of my famous sayings, and complimentary tea.
So even if you don't get the cruise, you get a nice second prize.
There are nine additional winners.
So you know the drill.
To be automatically entered, all you have to do is simply shop online at 2ifbytea.com between right now and 11:59 p.m. Pacific.
And I promise you, folks, this is an escape of a lifetime, and you'll remember it for years to come.
The only thing that will be missing is that I won't be there.
But that's a small price to pay.
You will still have a wonderful time.
So hurry up, shop at 2ifbyt.com right now to be automatically entered.
All the official rules are posted at 2ifbyt.com, and the tea's on sale, by the way.
Reduced price.
We continue to be a proud sponsor of the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
They do great work, college scholarships for the children of Marines killed in action or a domestic tragedy such as 9-11.
And we support other charitable efforts through significant product and monetary donations throughout the year.
So it's a win-win for everybody involved.
2IFBIT.com.
Again, all of the rules are posted there.
And by the way, when you're there, we have a new Hall of Patriots page.
We're having a lot of fun with this, and particularly the website.
And we have all the previous 2FBT sweepstakes winners, pictures and little bios of them at 2FBT.com under the Hall of Patriots page.
It's very cool pictures there.
And they still write.
All these ex-winners still write to tell us what a great time that they had.
So it's all there for you to check out at 2ifbyt.com.
Okay, Gallup has just released their latest trial run poll with registered voters.
Presidential election Romney 47, Obama 45.
I've got this new app picked up on the iPhone over the weekend.
It's a poll tracker.
Every poll in the world, I got a notification alert.
And this Gallup poll is been consistent for two or three days.
And folks, you know me.
I don't rely on polling at all.
I think polling is used to shape opinion rather than reflect it.
I think polling is used to make news.
And particularly, as you get closer to the election, they become more relevant.
A poll in March or April is worthless because the election's not March or April.
It's too much yet to happen.
But you can, if you want to study them, you can detect trends.
And in swing states, Romney and Ryan are gaining ground.
And in some places, it's small, but it's perceptible.
I just get there's something happening out there.
And I frankly have been of the opinion that, and I've been very careful saying this, but you've heard me say it.
If the election were held today, I think we're looking at landslide.
I thought that a week ago.
I don't think this is, I don't want to say this too often because political situations are too volatile as the Aiken thing illustrates.
But they're not looking, Obama isn't looking happy.
Nobody on the Democrat side is looking happy.
These people are at war with each other, and they're getting, even if it's possible, more maniacal in their TV appearances.
And they're saying some of the craziest, wackiest things.
And the Aiken thing's unfortunate, but I'm going to tell you, I think the Democrats are, I don't want to say this too loud either because I don't want to affect what their inclinations are, but I think they're set to implode over this.
They have these hot-button boilerplate issues that cause them to go to page two of their playbook that's 30 years old, and they put plans into motion that just are not relevant.
They live in a bubble.
They lie to themselves about their own popularity.
They fall for it because the medium creates a false impression of just how many people do support Democrats and liberals in this country.
I just have a sneaking sense.
And yeah, this, yeah, like, for example, nobody showing up at Obama appearances.
So they say, oh, well, we're doing that on purpose.
All right, right.
We are limiting the audience size so the president can have a more intimate event with the attendees.
And we're also limiting the amount of money at any one time.
That's such a crock.
There isn't the enthusiasm for Obama that there was.
Nowhere near it.
Anyway, let's go back to the phones.
Jim in Poplar Bluffs, Missouri.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Megan Diddles, Russ.
Thanks for taking my call.
Popper Bluff.
Yeah, you bet.
Right in the booth.
Hey, I drive a truck rush.
Yesterday I was listening to radio, and by 5 o'clock, I was all for getting Athens off, and I was about ready to tear the radio out.
I was sick of listening to everybody.
But I got to thinking, I was stationed in the service up there at Fort Leonardwood, and our company motto was deeds, not words.
And if I look at the deeds that Aikens has done, he's been conservative 100% straight down the road.
And that's why I voted for him.
And I think, like I said yesterday, I was aggravated, and I just wanted to just throw him under the bus also.
And I got to thinking about that.
I thought, no, the main thing.
What were you aggravated about?
Well, I was aggravated because of the words he said, and no one was supporting him.
You had Romney, you had Ashcroft, you had Chip Bond, all of them ready to throw this guy under the bus just for a few words you said.
And I guarantee you, all the words they have said and the things they have said, we've stood behind them.
And Missouri is conservative.
We're the show-me state.
And through Atkins' deeds, he has shown me he is conservative.
And it's time for a conservatives to stand in front of that fire squad instead of circling the fire squad.
It's time to grow up.
It's time to grow up.
You know, we said a stupid thing.
He didn't say a stupid thing.
Yeah, I got a lot of, I got a lot of calls from people like you yesterday on this who think that there's a whole lot of disloyalty going on out there.
And I'm going to tell you, Jim, it's simply because this is, we have to win the Senate.
All the rest of this is academic.
We have to have 51 senators if we're going to repeal Obamacare.
And we have to have people that are going to do it.
We've got a tremendous challenge ahead of us.
Winning the White House, taking the Senate, getting rid of Harry Reid and Chuck Yu Schumer and the rest of the Senate leadership.
And what Aiken did did not further that.
It remains to be seen if it's going to hurt.
But it was just unfortunate that the whole thing happened.
And then the aftermath, when he attempted to turn this around and make it look like He was a martyr in standing up for this.
It wasn't about abortion.
It wasn't about pro-choice or pro-life.
It wasn't about any of that.
It's about shooting ourselves in the foot unnecessarily.
We can't make any unforced errors.
We just can't afford them.
And that's why there was the outcry.
This is not something that you would suggest somebody do or say.
Hey, we go back to the phone.
Des Moines and Michael.
Thank you for calling, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, how you doing?
This is an absolute pleasure.
Thank you, sir.
And hey, the reason I'm calling is I got a little different take on Aiken and why he didn't back out.
You know, everybody, I was just like most other people.
I was extremely angry.
I'm listening to his interview yesterday.
He seemed clueless and everything.
But let me set this up for about five seconds.
You know, I'm in sales, and what hit me when I was listening to him is when he said he's an engineer.
And you know what?
When I'm in sales right now, when I can get someone emotionally involved, I've got a huge chance of success.
And whenever I run into an engineer, I'm at a dead end because you cannot get them emotionally involved.
They're strictly looking at it analytically, and you just can't get them to make a decision.
And I see this guy as, you know what, he's an engineer.
He's looking at, you know what?
I just made one mistake, one little misstep.
And to him, that's such a small percentage of anything he's ever, you know, that he can even comprehend.
He can't comprehend the emotional aspect of this situation and how it can possibly affect this thing down the road.
He's looking at it as an engineer, and it's just like beating your head against the wall trying to get through to this man.
Yeah, but wait a second.
In addition to being an engineer, he's a Marine, and he's a politician.
He's been a politician for a lot of years.
He's in the Missouri House of Representatives.
He's in the U.S. House.
Missouri House.
And he certainly understands politics.
Absolutely.
He's got to be able to reach people on a certain emotional level to get their votes.
Well, I agree with you there.
I just think this is ingrained in him, though.
I mean, when he said it, it struck a chord with me.
And all I could see is so many engineers I sit down with, and they're the ones I can't, you can't get them emotionally involved.
And this is a huge emotional issue.
Well, one thing that I will agree with you on, I probably would understand this.
He no doubt thinks that he worked damn hard to get this far.
And you're right, I think, in his mind, hey, I misspoke.
Big deal.
Okay, I apologize for it.
Big deal.
It's one mistake.
I worked really hard for him.
And he's a stick-to-it kind of guy.
And so just probably all of these appeals from people hardened him the other way.
He became a little defiant.
I know I would.
Yeah, that's my nature to a point.
But when he sits there and says, you know, he doesn't want to harm the party.
He doesn't want to do this.
He's totally detached that he is harming it.
And he has totally decreased his chances of winning.
He's totally decreased our chances of taking over the Senate.
Well, now, wait, if you're saying he's an engineer, you ought to be able to calculate that, right?
Right, but he's still stuck on that one little statement.
This can't possibly, you know, this is such a small percentage of everything I've done in my life that that shouldn't preclude him.
And he's not getting that, or he's not comprehending that, hey, this one little thing, this can't possibly explode into this big of an issue.
So are you making these assessments here as a means of excusing him?
No, I think it's I'm angry with what his decision is.
All right.
What I'm trying to say is, you know, it ticks me off in that he can't separate himself from that.
No, I'm not excusing him at all.
I'm definitely not on his side.
All right.
Not accusing you.
I just wanted to understand the vantage point that you were making this assessment.
Oh, gosh.
No, I'm for taking over whatever we can possibly do it and have the best chance at it.
And I just see him throwing us under a rock here.
Or that's probably not the best term, but just making it a little bit more difficult when we don't need any distraction.
And he's a distraction.
And he says, oh, I'm in it for, you know, this isn't about me is what he says.
But no, see, that's, it is.
He made it totally.
He put himself above everything else.
See, he did the exact opposite.
He put himself above everything.
The future of the country, the cause, getting rid of Obama.
He put himself above that.
He's elevating himself to be more important than that.
And that's what's irritating people.
Most people, I think, if they try to put themselves in this similar circumstance, let's say that you fervently believe that your country is hanging by a thread and you do something to weaken the thread.
Most people will say, I don't want to hurt the cause.
I do not want to set this effort back.
And most people probably think of themselves behaving that way.
They would put everything else above their own personal ambition given the objective here.
And when he doesn't do that, puts himself to that, that's what rubbed people the wrong way afterwards, I think.
But you could be onto something with his engineering background and so forth.
I appreciate the input, Michael.
Thanks much, Roanoke, Virginia, and Kathy.
You're up.
Great to have you here.
Hi.
Hey, Rush Dittos from the city where Barack Obama proclaimed that I didn't build my business.
I tell you, women on this show have been on fire today.
Listen, I just wanted to respond to a previous caller that you had today.
She was talking about pulling out the page from the Affordable Health Care Act, Obamacare, about where it talks about he's cut the $716 billion from Medicare.
Betsy McKeske was on Fox this morning as a panelist, and she pulled it directly from the Affordable Care Act, the page and the paragraph where it talks about that doctors are going to be receiving less money for those Medicare patients in order to bump up the Medicaid.
And she debated it and talked about it.
It's in her book.
And I just thought it was wonderful to finally hear someone talk about exactly where it was in that act.
Betsy, you're referring to Betsy McCoy.
McCoy.
Yeah.
She spells it in a way that it doesn't look like McCoy.
So that's why you think it's McKenzie because it looks like that, but it's McCoy.
She has been a noted health care expert since the first days of Hillary care.
She has written books, commented extensively on it.
I didn't see her on Fox yesterday morning, but if she went to the page and read from it, that's exactly that caller was a woman from Philadelphia.
Yes.
And she wants Romney and Ryan to do that.
You know, take that affordable care thing up there and actually read from it.
The thing that concerns me is, you know, in my business, I deal with a number of senior citizens, and I was talking about it to some of them this morning.
And their response to me is, are we going to be told about this?
And, you know, I'm saying, you know, are you educating yourself?
Are you not reading?
Are you not, you know, and it is a concern for me because I hear them saying this and they think exactly what the Democrats are trying to portray Romney and Ryan as being, that they're going to throw them over the cliff.
And I just have to reiterate to them, you've got to educate yourself.
You've got to read.
It's not true.
But see, you're doing it for them.
And I think this is important.
It's, you know, Romney and Ryan are doing great on this, but they're up against an opposition media that's trying to, A, not cover what they're doing or mischaracterize it.
And I think that we all are in this to try to get the message out to people that don't hear it or don't understand it.
And the real frustrating thing, and if you do, let's say you go get a copy of the Affordable Care Act and you get that page, you have your senior citizens come in, you're going to run into this.
You're going to read from it.
You're going to show it to them.
And they're still not going to believe it because they won't believe that a Democrat would do that.
And then you're going to really start pulling your hair.
I go, what more do I have to do?
It's right here.
This is Obamacare.
I'm reading to you.
$716 billion of Medicare.
That's you cut.
And guess what for?
To pay for health care for everybody else.
That's right.
And they're still not going to believe it.
Some of them are not going to look at.
I've been doing this.
You think you're frustrated?
Try having a radio show that reaches 25 million people.
25 years.
We're in our 25th year.
I run into people all the time who don't know Jack.
And you, yeah, I know how frustrating it is, is my point.
I know, do you know how frustrating?
I'll go play golf with my friends, and they'll say, you know what?
Did you see that column written by X yesterday?
And I said, no, what?
Well, it made the greatest point.
I said, well, I said that three weeks ago.
I don't say that to them because it doesn't matter.
The fact that they end up knowing it is all that matters to me.
I'm just telling you, I know your frustrations.
I can't tell you the number of people who throw back at me things I have said that they read somewhere else.
You know, and I want to grab them by the collar.
You doomkov.
I said, what am I doing here?
Really?
I don't have them on in here.
CNN just ran my picture with Ryan and Romney over...
Okay, Snerdly just told me that CNN just ran a graphic, a picture of me and Ryan and Romney with the graphic said Republicans who want Aiken to go.
Okay, fine and dandy.
Like I told you, if I had told Aiken to go yesterday, he'd be gone.
I didn't do it.
We'll be back after this.
Don't go away.
Hey, CNN, I have a better idea for you.
Instead of running a picture of me and a picture of Ryan and Romney and the graphic Republicans who want Aiken to go, it should say Republicans who want Obama to go.
Because that's what we're all focused on, CNN.
That's exactly right.
Put me and Romney and Ryan up there, and it says Republicans who want Obama to go.
And by the way, we don't even need the health care bill, folks, for this $716 billion in Medicare cuts.
We have the word the Congressional Budget Office.
I mentioned this to you.
July 24th, the CBO sent a letter to John Boehner, the Speaker of the House, detailing the budget impact of repealing the Affordable Care Act.
And the CBO letter said if Congress overturned the law, spending for Medicare would increase by an estimated $716 billion.
Now, what does that mean?
If we repeal the law, that means for those of you in Riolanda, tear it up and throw it out, like your last parking ticket.
Means the law doesn't, that means we would save Medicare spending would increase by $716 billion because it wouldn't be taken away.
Obamacare takes $716 billion out.
You know, it's frustrating.
It's true.
Why do we have to go show all kinds of pieces of paper?
It's true.
I know the visual aid counts.
We'll do whatever it takes.
Still, I know it's frustrating.
Okay, my friends, it's been a delight, as it always is, to be with you and discuss these things that matter so much, so dearly to all of us.
I wish I had time to squeeze it.
Well, I probably do, but it wouldn't be fair.
And so we'll just put it all off and come back in 21 hours and get started and revved up all over again.
This abortion business, Democrat-Republican Party platform planks and their conventions, we're ready for it.
I had some stuff ready to go.
If it reared its head, it didn't, but I have it standing by, so don't panic on that front.