All Episodes
Previous Next
May 18, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:55
May 18, 2012, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
The Facebook IPO is underway.
It opened to 38 bucks.
There were so many trades to start out, they got delayed.
Then it shot up to like 43 or 44.
And then it started falling.
And now it's at 3964.
Opened at 38.
It's at 39.64.
I have a bad feeling about this.
I hope the Fed doesn't have to go in and bail out Facebook at the end of the day.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Well, you know, if the Facebook, if it doesn't work, if it starts falling below the open price, it could start a panic.
I have to go in and bail them out.
You know, Bottle wouldn't love that.
Here's capitalism not working.
Look at all the losers.
I don't know, folks.
How are you?
Here we are on Open Line Friday, Rush Limbaugh and the EIB network.
Fun frolic and frivolity for all, as well as the serious discussion of issues.
We combined several things in one presentation, not found anywhere else in the big media.
The serious discussion of issues combined with an irreverent, sarcastic, sardonic, satirical humor.
That if you're not up to speed and have the show in context, you won't get.
That's why you have to listen here at least at least six weeks before you are fully accredited to understand what happens here.
Happy to have you along, folks.
Open line Friday, telephone number 800-282-2882.
The email address is L Rushmore at EIBNet.com.
And the program on Friday differs from Monday through Thursday in one simple way.
And that is we essentially don't screen the calls.
I mean, we answer them, but callers are not put through some rigorous process.
Whatever you want to talk about on Friday's okay.
Doesn't have to relate to anything.
It doesn't have to be anything I care about.
Monday through Thursday it does.
But on Friday, it ain't goes.
Questions, comments, whatever.
And we never know what we're going to get.
We've had a couple bombs in 23 years, but that's about it.
Just okay, one bomb.
We have one bomb, and it was within the past six or seven months.
Has it been over a year ago that the bomb took place?
Well, anyway, so we've had one bomb in 23 years, a little over a year ago.
But that's a golden opportunity for uh for those of you to uh talk about whatever.
Ask questions about when they make comments about whatever.
Feel free.
You know, I'm finding uh that this Reverend Wright stuff with Barack Obama that's it's back in the news again, and I'm something is is happening that that I'm not seeing it's anecdotal, but I am happening to think that this might be applicable in a statistical way to the nation at large.
I'm getting like we played the audio soundbite from Obama reading from one of his books a couple of weeks ago, in which he admitted bullying a young girl, in which he admitted trying cocaine.
Um admitted that he drank a lot, basically just lollygagged around.
And I know we've got new listeners this program.
It's been documented by the official ratings companies that monitor such things.
There are tons and tons of new listeners, but even it's even at that.
I'm overwhelmed with the number of people.
We're we're three and a half years into his regime, and I'm getting emails from people that first time they'd heard he'd done cocaine was in the past two, three weeks.
The first time they'd heard that he had bullied a younger, the first time that they didn't know his college transcripts hadn't been released.
They just assumed all that it had, they hadn't missed it.
But they didn't know any of this.
Now, we know that Obama wasn't vetted.
We know the mainstream media's done everything they can to protect him, but the Reverend Wright stuff was out there.
A lot of people are really some people, I'm even getting email from people who have not heard all the Reverend Wright stuff.
New listeners, not people listen to this program regularly, new listeners say they're hearing for the first time.
I mean, they they I'm getting I'm getting emails from people like we got when we were the first year, first two years of the program.
My gosh, I found you the other day driving around, I couldn't get anything else on the radio, and I'm hooked now.
Similar comments from uh customers at Two of By Thousand Program for the first time and learning stuff about Obama that we've all known for four years, they're just now hearing about.
It's driving home the fact that the drive-by's didn't vet this guy at all.
Now we know it, but I'm sitting here, I assume everybody knows that Obama did cocaine.
And this is the mistake that we just think because we know it, we assume everybody else knows it because word of mouth and this kind of thing.
Uh some of the Reverend Wright stuff.
It's surfaced again because there's there's some new um uh aspects of the Reverend Wright case.
For example, in in Ed Klein's book, The Amateur, we find out that uh a friend of and Klein's got this on tape.
A friend of Obama's offered Wright 150 grand, a bribe to stop preaching during the during the 2008 campaign.
Yeah, it was just 150.
That's probably why Wright didn't take it.
Uh that there was there was a there was another uh uh inf uh in in the Ed Klein book, another story that uh Obama was talking to Wright one day, Reverend Wright, and say, you know, Reverend, your problem is you have to tell the truth.
As a politician, I don't.
I don't have to tell the truth.
I can make the truth whatever I want it to be.
That's on tape.
Well, no, no, that's not on tape.
But that's Klein claims that Obama said that to Wright.
So there's all kinds of new stuff that's surfacing about Reverend Wright, in addition to the old stuff being recycled that people are hearing for the first time.
It literally is amazing.
The Wright stuff was all over talk rate, it was all over Fox News.
Uh but I I think in one way this is encouraging because it it is a uh great indication of just how many additional people are finding their way to conservative media now.
So I thought, okay, well, maybe we'll go back in time to something.
Look, I want to play the Charlie Rose Tom Brokov bit here again.
And uh the the reason is that it is by itself amazingly explanatory.
By itself, it explains to people the drive-by media in um in in all kinds of ways.
Now, I don't think it's going to humiliate the media, and in fact, I don't think humiliating the media will change anything.
I don't I think they're beyond being humiliated.
I think they're insulated from that.
But the Charlie Rose Tom Brokaw clip that we've been playing off and on for three and a half years now.
Here you have two liberal Democrat icons who didn't know, who didn't care to know the first darn thing about Barack Obama, a community organizer who had a ton of secrets and still does.
His grade transcripts, his relationship with Bill Ayers, and even it's happening all over again.
We're not supposed to talk about Reverend Wright, but we can go back, and the Washington Post can do a 50-year-old story about Mitt Romney at a grade school or a prestigious prep school or whatever.
But we we can't go, and then Romney's not going to go there.
And I predicted this.
I predicted that whoever the Republican nominee is, they they would not go after Obama the way they're going after each other.
I predicted back in January.
I'll have that audio sound bite coming up for you.
But his college transcripts, a relationship he had with Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, Rashid Khalidi, Frank Marshall Davis, his ties to Acorn, what his role was in the middle million man march, scholarships, loans, how did he become such a fantastic writer having written nothing before dreams of my father?
And the stuff that he had written was no great shakes.
Where'd he learn to write?
They don't care what goes on in the White House.
They don't care.
I mean, the media, they don't care what goes on in the White House when it's Obama's.
They don't care what goes on in the attorney general's office.
They don't care what's going on in the energy department, the labor department.
They don't care, and they don't want people to know what a rat's nest every quarter of this regime is.
And there is a decent amount of corruption in this, and people are just now coming to that, hearing about this for the first time in their lives.
So the media essentially worked for Senator Obama and helped him run right over Hillary Clinton.
And by the way, I wouldn't be surprised.
I don't know.
I'm just speculating.
I wouldn't be surprised.
Some of this stuff that we're now learning about Obama.
Maybe the Clintons are behind it.
Bill said he wants to go back to the White House.
Bill said he thinks Hillary ought to be in there.
Bill went out there again and undercut Obama this week on taxes, said the middle class is going to have to pay more taxes.
And Obama's out there trying to convince the middle class they're never going to pay another dime that it's only the rich.
In fact, Obama is out there complaining about the rich in this company because they're people starving in Kenya.
His relatives are still in the huts over in Kenya.
His relatives are still starving over it.
He's got a brother.
You may not know this, folks.
If you are new to the program, Obama has a brother.
Lives in a six square foot hut.
I am not kidding.
Maybe six by nine.
He lives in a hut.
A brother, half-brother or something like that.
Lives in a hut.
I know they're going to think I'm joking because I'm a naturally funny guy.
And you say something like this, and well, naturally funny guy says stuff like this.
Ah, yeah, that's really funny, right?
And it's true, folks.
The brother has complained about.
Lives in a there's not even a in fact, there's only one town, one house in Obama's brother's village that's got running water and electricity.
That's his grandmother.
Or something like that.
And that was just in the last two or three years.
But this kid, I mean his brother, it lives on a dollar a day.
Essentially, and it was pointed out that $20 would change this guy's life.
Like if somebody gave you 50,000.
Hey, Obama hasn't coughed up a dime for his brother, but he uses him.
He's using him went to some agriculture symposium yesterday to talk about how there's more farmland in Africa anywhere in the in the world, but the people at the top are not sharing.
So once again, we are not doing enough to feed the world.
The lucky few at the top are the reason why Obama's brother still lives in a hut.
He hadn't even sent him a sign that says hut sweet hut inside.
Most people have a home sweet home.
Not even a hut sweet hut.
Here's the Brocaw and Rose Clip.
Now I want to set this up for you.
This is November 30, October 30th, 2008.
This is less than a week before the election in 2008.
Who's Tom Brokaw?
Tom Brokaw, NBC White Wyouz.
He's the anchor.
He was the anchor of the NBC Iowa use for, I don't know, years, decades.
He's in the Tom, uh Dan, rather Peter Jennings era.
He's covered conventions left and he's been everywhere.
He's uh sat down the broken bread with Mikhail Gorbachev over to Kremlin.
He's been everywhere.
He is a journalist.
What do journalists do?
They tell us what we don't know.
They're out there and they're looking at things and they see stuff and then they tell us.
They report.
Whatever they see that we don't see, they tell us.
Journalists, by definition, are supposed to be uh uh incurably curious.
That's what's supposed to drive journalists, their curiosity, their insatiable desire for information and news, and their desire to be first with it when they when they learn it.
Who is Charlie Rose?
Well, Charlie Rose used to work at CBS News.
Now He's back at CBS News in the morning show.
Used to do an overnight CBS show or something on the network television.
He's been at PBS doing the Charlie Rose show at 11 o'clock at night, interviewing everybody that's alive for the last 20 years.
Charlie Rose knows everybody, talks to everybody, reads the New York Times every day.
So does Brokow.
And they got together on Charlie's show, the 11 p.m. show on PBS, less than a week before the 2008 elections.
Less than a week.
Both of them staunch, unalterably supporting Obama.
Listen to the soundbite less than a week.
One of the premier elite journalists in our country talking to one of our premier elite interviewers in our country.
I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.
No, I don't know.
I don't know how he really sees where China is.
We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.
I don't really know.
And do we know anything about the people who are advising them?
You know, it's an interesting question.
He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational speeches.
I don't know what books he's read.
What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?
There's a lot about him we don't know.
Less than a week before the election.
And these two guys are two of the biggest Obama supporters there can be.
They're journalists, they have to be.
There's no other candidate they would support.
Certainly not George W. Bush.
They're in a tank for Obama and they don't know him.
And they are journalists, and they're the guys that have the constitutional duty to tell us who he is.
They are supposed to hold people who have power or who seek power, they're to hold those people accountable.
They don't know.
I I when I first heard that sound, but I was incredulous.
I that's grounds for being fired.
If I'm the CEO at NBC, or at the time General Electric, which don't even be, I'm listening to my number one anchor say I don't know who the Democrat presidential nominee is a week before the election.
Well, why am I paying you a dime?
You're not even doing your job.
You don't know who he is.
And likewise, if I'm at if I'm at PBS and I'm losing my number one interview guy, 11 o'clock at night.
I don't know.
I don't know what books he's read.
I don't.
I have to be asking myself, why am I paying these guys?
They are at the top of the ladder in journalism, and they admit they don't know who he is.
And that's why you've never heard until this year that Obama did cocaine or he bullied a girl or whatever.
Because these guys who are supposed to tell you didn't know.
Now the question is, did they really not know?
Or did they know who he is, just didn't want to tell anybody.
I'll tell you, there are none so blind as a journalist who does not want to see.
Open line Friday, Rush Limboy having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Here at the Limbaugh Institute, here's the Obama soundbite.
This is from this morning in Washington at the symposium on global agriculture and food security.
Yes, we have new terms now.
Food security and food insecurity.
And here is Obama again implying the United States of America not doing enough to feed the world because of the lucky few at the top and their selfishness.
I've spoken before about uh relatives I have in Kenya who live in villages where hunger is sometimes a reality.
Despite the fact that African farmers can be some of the hardest working people on earth.
Most of the world's unused arable land is in Africa.
That's why we're here.
In Africa and around the world, progress isn't coming fast enough.
And economic growth can't just be for the lucky few at the top.
It's got to be broad base for everybody.
And a good place to start is in the agricultural sector.
Economic growth can't just be for the lucky few at the top.
So here goes the class envy.
Remember Joe Biden all week.
God's sakes, men, we're not against capitalism.
We love capitalism.
Here's Obama.
Once again, vilifying the lucky few at the top.
Biden's out there.
Yeah, we want you to dream to be a millionaire.
Hell I dream to be a millionaire.
It's still a dream, but I'm still dreaming.
I want to be a millionaire.
You can be a millionaire.
Not in this country.
You can dream about it.
You become a millionaire.
You become a target.
You become a member of the lucky few not doing enough for everybody else.
And Obama admits he's got hungry relatives in Africa.
Send them a sandwich.
Send them a care package for crying out loud instead of making a speech at an agriculture symposium.
It's your family, man.
Hi, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh meeting and surpassing all audience expectations.
On a daily basis, open line Fridays, we wrap up a busy broadcast week.
Eduardo Savron.
One of the original Facebook founders holds what, 3% of the company now?
Still makes him a billionaire.
Eduardo Savarin's family fled his native land.
I believe that's Brazil.
Not sure.
He came to the United States.
Family came to the United States to escape oppression wherever they were.
Founded.
Eduardo Savron goes to Harvard, meets Zuckerberg, they start Facebook.
He becomes a billionaire.
Eduardo Savron moves to Singapore.
Last week, Eduardo Savron renounced his American citizenship because of taxes.
The capital gains tax when this IPO goes and his share value is actually monetized and not just on paper.
Will be something I it's not right in front of me, but I think the tax that Savarin would owe, be something like 64, 68 million dollars.
And Eduardo Saverin said, heck with it.
He's not a native-born American.
His family moved here.
He's in Singapore.
And by the way, he's pretty big guy in Singapore.
He runs around all the clubs.
He's in their gossip columns over there.
He's pretty hot character.
Likes it.
Young guy, has the world at the palm in the palm of his hand, doesn't want to pay the tax, so he renounces his citizenship to avoid the taxes.
Chuck Yu Schumer and the Democrats have decided they're not going to put up with this.
So they are going to pass a law that a bill of attainder, essentially, which is going to punish somebody for actions they've already taken that were not against the law.
And those bills of attained are actually not legal for the most part.
But the big Bruhaha has now a big debate has arisen.
And I wonder what you think about it.
Is Eduardo Savron a coward?
Is he abandoning his responsibilities as a citizen in avoiding these taxes?
Did he stay here long enough to truly remarkably benefit from America?
And then in the moment of truth.
When the time came to pay for it, Eduardo Savron's out of there.
Or out of here.
And then renouncing his citizenship.
For what I read, a lot of blogs where all the people think they're really smart.
Eduardo Savron's taking it pretty hard, taking a lot of hits.
People are not approving what he's doing.
Walking out on this country, abandoning his country, particularly in his country's time of need.
Country could really use the sixty-four million dollars.
Other people say Eduardo Savron is just a microcosm of American business.
Moving out of the country, establishing overseas operations to avoid high taxes.
got the highest corporate tax rate in the world now at 35%.
Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, had a meeting with Boehner this week.
Nobody knows what it was about, but everybody's guessing that Cook went in there and said, Look, we need your help in supporting a tax holiday.
We'd love to repatriate our foreign funds, but we don't want to pay these exorbitant taxes in the process.
So we'd be happy to bring that money back and put it into circulation here in the U.S. economy, but not at the current tax rates.
And people are dumping all over Apple and a number of other U.S. corporations for doing this.
So the question becomes, as far as I can tell, or as far as I'm concerned, the question is, is Eduardo Saffron or Saverin and all these other U.S. corporations, are they guilty of poor citizenship?
Or are they simply reacting entirely normally to tax policy?
This is the the uh it is it is clear that it is tax policies, and these tax policies, high taxes on the rich, on millionaires, that Joe Biden says, oh no, we believe in capitalism.
We love capital God, man.
It's what built the country.
But his president's out there demonizing successful people every day, targeting successful people every day, running a presidential campaign based on class warfare, trying to get the 99% of the country who are not in the top 1% to hate the 1%, to literally despise them.
It seems to me that it was the tax policy that came first.
The tax policy that came first that's chasing people like Eduardo Savron and other companies out of this country in increasing numbers.
And people were talking about Eduardo Saffronization of the right to do this.
He's shirking his responsibilities as citizens.
This is a cowardly thing to do.
Well, I left New York State for the same reason.
Now I didn't have to renounce citizenship, but I left New York State for the same reason.
I moved to a state with no state income tax.
I'm sure that people think that I am not a patriotic New Yorker.
I spent eight years there.
I paid my dues, and they still follow me.
Every year I get audited under the premise I'm lying to them about the number of days every year I live and work in New York, which are zero.
I have to prove it 14 different ways every day of the year.
Where I am, where my calendar, where I say I was.
And I can I can tell you, I left New York for tax reasons.
I'll be, I'm I'm the first one to admit it, and I'm not the only one.
Talk to Trump.
Trump will tell you knows a lot of other people have done it too.
So if it's a more favorable tax haven that you can find elsewhere and you go there, why is it automatically that you are unpatriotic?
Why is it automatically that you are a coward that you are not paying your fair share?
It's this whole class envy thing rearing its head again.
So I just wanted to throw it out there.
Trayvon Martin had drugs in his system.
This is turning out to be the Duke Lacrosse case all over again.
Trayvon Martin, the 17-year-old who was shot and killed by George Zimmerman, had the drug THC in his system the night of his death.
That's the primary ingredient in marijuana.
Revelation came as prosecutors in the case prepared to release the public hundreds of pages of new evidence along with videos and crime scene photos.
None of this information was in the charging affidavit.
None of it.
The charging affidavit contained only the fact that Zimmerman went out there and profiled Trayvon Martin.
Even now, even now, NBC News, and we can never forget what they did.
NBC News doctored the 9-11 tape of Zimmerman's call to the cops to make it look like Zimmerman was profiling and was a racist and was only chasing Trayvon Martin because he was a black guy.
They totally doctored that tape.
The person that doctored it supposedly has been fired.
Two other people at NBC were fired shortly afterwards.
We don't know who the original editor was who was canned.
They haven't identified by name, but they've told us the person's been fired.
The tape was doctored on two separate occasions.
And even after all of that, what I said earlier, but you can't humiliate the media.
NBC News had a story this week in which they referred to George Zimmerman as a white man with Hispanic heritage.
After all of the so-called embarrassment and humiliation that they should have felt and suffered over the journalistically criminal doctoring of the 9-11 tape.
They didn't just leave something out of it.
They put it in a different order.
They made it sound like Zimmerman said something that he didn't say.
He only identified Trayvon Martin as black after he was asked to by the dispatcher.
He did not volunteer the information.
The NBC edited version of the tape makes it look like that's the first thing that Zimmerman told them when he made the 9-11 call.
The New York Times was the first to run the story that Zimmerman was a white Hispanic.
It was the fifth time in the history of the New York Times anybody could find where they had done that.
But NBC this week referred to Zimmerman as a white man with his Hispanic heritage.
Even after all of this new evidence is coming out.
That Zimmerman was literally beat up.
That Trayvon Martin had bruises on his knuckles.
Thank you.
That the eyewitnesses now that a cop documenting Zimmerman's story almost step by step.
This case is falling apart.
Now Trayvon Martin, THC was found in his blood and in his urine.
Here's another thing.
The autopsy showed Zimmerman shot Martin from a distance of between one inch and 18 inches away, which bolsters Zimmerman's claim that he shot Martin during a struggle.
Everybody else, the media tried to make it look like Trayvon Martin was shot in cold blood by George Zimmerman, who was chasing after him and shot him from a distance without any provocation.
And none of that was true.
None of the way the story was originally reported, very little of it was true, just like the Duke Lacrosse case.
So now, in the New York Daily News today, is a column by Alan Dershowitz of Harvard Law.
The headline says it all, Drop George Zimmerman's Murder Charge.
According to this column by Dershowitz, this new evidence is proof positive.
Well, not proof positive, but it's highly likely here that George Zimmerman did indeed, as he said, acted in self-defense.
Thank you.
Medical report by George Zimmerman, a white man with Hispanic heritage.
Medical report by Zimmerman's doctors disclosed Zimmerman had a fractured nose, two black eyes, two lacerations on the back of his head, and a back injury on a day after the final shooting.
Fatal shooting.
If this evidence turns out to be valid, the prosecutor will have no choice but to drop the second degree murder charge against Zimmerman if she wants to act ethically, lawfully, and professionally.
There is, of course, no assurance that the special prosecutor handling the case will do the right thing because until now her actions have been anything but ethical, lawful, and professional.
That's Dershowitz, Harvard Law, a liberal writing about a state attorney up in Jacksonville.
I fully expect the Jacksonville affiliate, WOKV to call the state attorney and ask them what they think of what Limbaugh said about what Dershowitz said.
I gotta take a brief timeout.
We'll do it.
My friends will come back and we'll get to your phone calls.
We always try to do that in the opening hour on Open Line Friday.
Sit tight.
Back before you know it.
NBC News, by the way, also claimed in their story after the autopsy was revealed, or really the detailed autopsy report, NBC claimed that uh uh Trayvon Martin was shot at intermediate range, not close range.
I don't know the official term is close range, but the distance was between one and eighteen inches.
I don't know what the legal term for that distance is.
And I don't know what the distance is for intermediate range is, but but NBC is attempting to imply that Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin from quite a ways away.
I honestly I don't know what's happened to this network.
It's not just MSNBC that's that's gone over the cliff.
The parent network NBC has as well.
Not just there's no pretense anymore.
Even after the 9-11 tapes were doctored, even after they fired three people involved in that, supposedly, they still describe Zimmerman as a white man with Hispanic heritage.
In order to carry the racist template forward, that this was a crime that occurred only because a white guy saw a black guy wearing a hoodie in his neighborhood and doesn't like black guys in his neighborhood, so pow.
That's what NBC wants its readers and viewers to believe happened when it didn't.
They know it didn't.
Yet it doesn't matter.
To the phones we go.
We're starting in uh in Athens, Georgia.
This Benjamin.
Benjamin, great to have you on Open Line Friday.
You are up first, and that carries with it.
A profound responsibility up to you to get the show off on the right foot, caller wise.
Rush, megadetta's from Athens, Georgia.
You want to pass that responsibility to the next caller.
I know it's a daunting responsibility.
You want to take it.
No, I'm I'm here.
Can you hear me, Rush?
I hear you.
Good.
Okay, he's up, he's game.
Go.
Megadetta from Athens, Georgia.
First time caller, 14-year listener since my mom used to drive me to piano lessons at age 12, and we listen to Russ.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Well, I missed, I missed your comments earlier in the week on safety morning, and I had a question in the way of an analogy.
Um, if McDonald made a nuke hamburger and marketed it, and it flopped and they lost a hundred million dollars.
Would the FBI investigate McDonald's and would the CEO be called up to Washington to testify to the Senate?
No.
Uh the FBI and the regime would investigate McDonald's for selling food with too many calories.
Uh the uh now here's the your point is well taken.
We played the soundbite yesterday, little Treasury Secretary, Timmy Geitner.
Now, by the way, they passed Dodd Frank, financial regulatory reform law.
It's supposed to fix all this.
They're not supposed to be any more cheating.
They're not supposed to be any more fraud.
They're not supposed to be any more anti-trading.
After Sarban's Oxley and Frank Dodd and all the other liberal financial regulatory reform legislation, there's not supposed to be any more Chicanoe.
And yet JP Morgan Chase, a series of trades, ended up going bad.
Two billion dollar loss.
Geitner goes out and says, Well, my gosh, we don't have enough regulation.
Uh, we're we're gonna this is a this is a great great, great uh example, he said.
We're gonna need even more regulation.
And the uh it's maddening.
In capitalism, you lose as well as win.
People win and lose every day, sometimes multiple times.
There's no guarantees.
There are no guarantees in life.
That's why I'm joking.
If the Facebook thing goes south today, somebody gonna suggest it get bailed out.
I don't know what's gonna happen, but it's not skyrocketing like the original prognostication said it was.
It's hovering right about the open price of 38.
I don't know where it's gonna end up.
Now, these people are taking every opportunity to have the government control as much of the free market as possible.
They love the fact that that happened to JP Morgan.
That's the bottom line.
Yes, of course I'm gonna talk about that uh literary agent blurbed that Obama was born in Kenya.
Of course, I'm gonna talk about it.
I'm gonna, you know, Barney Frank ought to be on TV all day today.
Mr. Frank, how did you miss this?
This JP Morgan chased you.
▲
Export Selection