All Episodes
Previous Next
April 26, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:25
April 26, 2012, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program documented to be almost always right 99.7% of the time, and it's going to be that way for a while.
You can't get to 99.8 without being right a gazillion percent of the time for a long time.
And who knows?
Great to have you with us, folks, Rush Limbaugh serving humanity simply by being here at the Limbo Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, telephone number 800 282-288-2, the email address L Rushpo at EIBnet.com.
Bloomberg has changed their headline on the unemployment number story.
In the first hour, I shared with you the three stories from the drive-bys, all honest about the unemployment number and how pathetic it is, and how it means there isn't any real growth in the job market.
Bloomberg's original headline was more Americans than projected filed jobless claims last week.
The new headline is cooling U.S. labor market takes a toll on confidence economy.
Same link, same URL, same story, completely different headline.
Cooling U.S. labor market takes a toll on confidence economy.
That's even worse than the original headline.
Okay.
Now let me finish on this Romney stuff from the election before we move on, and understand this is April 26th, and anything can change.
I'm telling you what's in my mind and heart right now.
And I will admit to you that a lot of what I'm telling you is something I really hope for.
I'm not fooling myself.
I'm not in denial.
I am not ignoring reality.
I am sharing with you where I hope the people of this country are.
And I also am sharing with you where I think the people of this country are.
But many, many people disagree with me, particularly when I say Obama could lose in a landslide.
For Obama to lose in a landslide, it means a lot of people are going to vote for Romney.
And there are people who don't see any enthusiasm for Romney.
And I can't deny that.
There are some people that have zilch enthusiasm for Romney.
Okay.
I've always believed here that to win an election, you have to have people voting for you.
And I believe that here.
I don't think a landslide's going to happen simply because people voting against Obama.
Although, in 2010, that's what happened.
In the midterm elections, with not a single Republican name on a ballot anywhere, nationally, of course there were house races and so forth, but that was an anti-status quo election.
And it was deep and it was big, and it was down the ballot.
I mean the Democrats lost in excess of 700 seats in the House, in state houses, all the way down to town councils.
It was big.
And it's worse now than it was then.
Now one of the theories, uh one of the fears, is that there are many millions of conservatives who so distrust Romney that they just won't vote.
That they are unhappy with the way the nomination process ended up.
And they're not happy with Romney, and they're not enthusiastic, and they just might stay home.
They just might sit at home and not vote.
There are people who fear that that will happen.
There are people who think that no matter how bad Romney or how bad Obama is, that Republicans don't have the answers either.
Not conservatives don't have the answers.
Republicans don't have the answers.
And I will concede these these hardcore Republican uh operatives and the consultants and so forth.
I do think they're like everybody else in the Beltway.
They live in a bubble.
And they don't know what's going on outside the beltway.
They think they do, but they don't.
And I think too many of them are counting on people like me to gin up enthusiasm for them.
They're counting on Obama to gin up enthusiasm for them rather than doing it themselves.
I don't think that they grasp the lack of confidence in them among Tea Party conservatives and Tea Party Republicans.
So anything can change between now and then.
I just wanted to share with you the dinner party story and what I said.
I tell you there was one other guest who agreed with me.
And he thought that Obama was going to go down big.
And I think it's still entirely possible.
So we'll get to your phone calls on this in um in mere moments.
Moving on now to uh to other things.
Senator James Inhoff of Oklahoma took to the Senate floor yesterday to draw attention to a video of a top official at the Environmental Protection Agency saying that the EPA's philosophy is to crucify and make examples of oil and gas companies.
Just as the Romans crucified random citizens in areas they conquered to ensure obedience.
Now, in setting this up, I just want to remind you, and again, I'm always cognizant of the fact that we have a considerable number of new audience members in the last six weeks who are not up to speed or in context.
So indulge me for a moment if you've been a regular listener for a number of years here.
The Democrat Party is currently constituted the American left, big oil, big retail, big success is their enemy.
They believe in the state.
They believe in the government doing everything for everybody.
They want the power they want the control.
And if you've paid any attention whatsoever over the years, you cannot deny that every Democrat under the sun has demonized big oil.
Gas price goes up a penny.
The Democrats get into gear, start targeting big oil.
Big oil executives want to raise taxes on them, want to blame them.
Obama's trying to get rid of oil and replace it with batteries and green technology, which is pie in the sky.
There's no business there.
One of the things, one of the challenges I've always had in these 23 years, is convincing non-ideological people just who liberals are.
It's been one of my quests, in fact.
It's one of the things that keeps me showing up here every day.
It's an unfinished job.
It's an unfinished project to finally find ways to get through to people who are not ideological.
And by that I mean they don't live life or analyze life in terms of liberal versus conservative, left versus right, right.
In fact, they might hate that.
These are the people that don't like labels.
These are the people that think that looking at people that way is simplistic.
It's not.
And by the way, there's nothing wrong with simple.
Simple is always best.
Complex is unnecessary.
That's why I like to make the complex simple and understandable.
So if you are one of these non-ideological people, who, when you hear, for example, me issue warnings about who liberals are and what they really believe, you have to hear this.
This is an appointed official at the APA.
This is somebody Obama wants there.
Obama himself has said oil is tired and old and we have to get rid of it.
That should matter to you.
Oil is the fuel of the engine of freedom.
Oil is directly tied to standard of living, prosperity, opportunity for prosperity, and freedom.
It's not a pollutant.
It's not any more dangerous than anything else that's organic.
And found naturally on this planet.
What is illogical and borders on the insane is the hatred the left has for oil.
That's what's insane.
That's what's illogical.
That's what's irrational.
There's no reason to hate oil.
But they do, and they hate people who work in that business.
Now that may sound extreme.
It may sound strange.
People don't want to believe that kind of thing.
So every once in a while you get a gift.
And we have it.
This EPA administrator.
I don't have to tell you what the left thinks, because we have a member doing it for me.
His name is Al Armanderes.
I don't know if I'm pronouncing that right.
But he is the EPA Region 6 administrator.
This is from May 2010.
Two years ago, in Dish, Texas.
This is who liberals are.
This is who Obama wants in power.
Because this is also what Obama believes.
You may as well just assume that Barack Obama is saying this.
All these people say, Gia, how did this guy get past Obama?
Is Obama know these people?
Yes, they didn't get past him.
He finds them.
He has people that finds these people.
Barack Obama is going to get around Congress any way he can.
The EPA writing law in the form of regulations is one way he's going to do it.
Two years ago, Dish, Texas, Al Armanderes.
I gave an analogy to my staff about my philosophy of enforcement.
It was kind of like how the Romans used to conquer the villages in the Mediterranean.
They'd go into a little Turkish town somewhere, they'd find the first five guys they saw, and they'd crucify them.
And then, you know, that town was really easy to manage for the next few years.
So you make examples out of people who were, in this case, not complying with the law.
So you find people who are not complying with the law.
You hit them as hard as you can.
You make examples out of them.
It's a deterrent.
A deterrent.
You hit them as hard as you can.
Find people not complying with the law.
I gave an analogy to my staff about my philosophy with enforcement.
He's talking about oil here.
Kind of like how the Romans used to conquer little villages in the Mediterranean.
They go in a little Turkish town somewhere.
They'd find the first five guys they saw into and they'd crucify them.
And then that town was really easy to manage over the next few years.
This is who these people are.
Had you not heard this, Don.
This is who they are, folks.
This is this is the governing philosophy of this administration.
This may as well have been Barack Obama saying this.
Here's the full transcript.
I was in a meeting once, gave an analogy to my staff about my philosophy of enforcement.
I think it was probably a little crude and maybe not appropriate for the meeting, but I'll go ahead and tell you what I said.
It was kind of like how the Romans used to, you know, conquer villages in the Mediterranean.
They'd go into these little Turkish towns somewhere.
They'd find the first five guys they saw and they'd crucify them.
Then you know that town was really easy to manage for the next few years.
It's a deterrent factor.
Explaining the EPA is following the Romans' philosophy for subjugating conquered villages.
That's how this guy wanted to deal and was dealing with oil and gas companies.
Legitimate American and international corporations.
He hates them.
He wants to subjugate them.
He wants to crucify them just because he can.
And he's bragging about how to do it.
That's who they are, my friends.
This is who the American left is.
The worldwide left.
That is their plan and their philosophy and their approach for everybody and everything they disagree with.
Here's another soundbite.
This is Barack Obama, January 2008.
He's a senator.
Interviewed by the San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board.
They're having a discussion about energy and the environment.
And Obama was asked, what about alternatives including coal?
What are your plans for alternatives using coal?
What I've said is that we would put a uh cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there.
So if somebody wants to build a coal power plant, they can.
It's just that it will bankrupt them because they're gonna be charged a huge sum for all that uh greenhouse gas that's being emitted.
So in 2008, Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board that he intended to put the coal business out of business by making it financially impossible for them to stay in business.
And by the way, in Obama's home state of Illinois, they are closing coal-fired power plants.
At that same editorial board meeting, Obama described his energy plan in general.
When I was asked earlier about uh the issue of coal, uh, you know, under my plan uh of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.
Get rid of coal, demonize oil and gas and try to find a way to replace that, and electricity rates will skyrocket.
This was the plan.
Now the mainstream media didn't report any of this.
The San Francisco Chronicle released the tape, but they didn't make a big deal of it back when Obama said it.
It was left up to us.
They've not hidden who they are.
Obama has not hidden who he is.
This guy, Al Armanderas.
They're oil phobes, oilophobes.
These people are dangerous, folks.
They uh they they pose a clear and present danger.
I gotta take a break.
We'll get to your phone calls when we come back.
Don't go away.
By the way, the uh interior secretary, Ken, the cowboy hat Salazar said, I I don't, I get gasoline could get to nine dollars a gallon.
Nobody knows where it's gonna end up.
Nine dollars a gallon.
The regime saying that with a shrug of the shoulders.
If you notice this Al uh Armin uh Darres guy, was speaking to colleagues.
If you noticed, we only hear the left's real plans when they're talking with their colleagues, with fellow travelers.
That's how we heard Obama's comments about the bitter clingers, as well as his uh plans for moving us to single payer health care system when he's talking to the unions, when he's talking to fellow travelers of the San Francisco uh Chronicle.
That's when we hear he's gonna put the coal business out of it.
He never tells you that.
He never says this stuff in public.
He only says it to his friends and Al Armanderas, same thing, down there in Texas with his colleagues.
And here's how I'm gonna I'm gonna crucify, as Reverend Wright would say.
Going to crucify big oil.
So forth.
Now let me tell you what that was about.
At the same time of this tape of Al Armander is down in Texas, 2010, he was targeting at the EPA.
This same guy was targeting a company called Range Resources.
A company based in Fort Worth, range resources is the company that discovered the Marcellus Shale Field in Pennsylvania, the biggest natural gas field in America, one of the biggest in the world.
Range resources discovered it.
This guy, Al Armanderes, claimed that range resources fracking had contaminated groundwater in Texas.
He issued an order to just shut them down.
The guy you heard on the tape.
The Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates oil and gas drilling in Texas, found no evidence that range resources had polluted anything.
And finally, just last month, two years after the fact, the EPA withdrew its order, and a federal court dismissed the EPA's case.
And in fact, according to Senator Inhoff and other experts, the environmentalists have still not been able to produce a single case to prove that fracking contaminates groundwater.
But this little bureaucrat, thinking he's Mr. Hotstuff, doing the bidding of Barack Obama.
Yes, I'm mad.
If I I am spitting mad over this.
Everybody ought to be.
This little bureaucrat on his own, admitting to his colleagues that his job is to crucify big oil and big gas the way the Romans did it.
You go in and you find five guys, whether they've done anything or not, and you crucify them, you make an example, and that's how you scare everybody into not doing anything you don't want them to do.
So this range resources discovers the Marcella Shale Field, biggest natural gas field in America, and this guy accuses them falsely of contaminating groundwater because of their fracking technique, and orders them to be shut down.
And he can do it.
And he's doing Barack Obama's bidding.
And it takes two years, and finally, the whole thing's thrown out with no evidence whatsoever.
Two years this company had to endure.
This is EPA terrorism.
And that's who these people are.
And that's why you need to see these people in an ideological framework, folks.
It's who they are.
And we are back.
Emails during the break.
You just say, you just say all this stuff about Al Armander's shutting down range resources.
You don't cite a source.
Okay, Forbes magazine.
Like I'm gonna make this up.
Forbes magazine has the details on what our Al Armander has tried to do, or what he did do to range resources.
All because what did they do?
They discovered the largest natural gas field in America.
That's a crime.
And because they used fracking to do it.
And the left believes that fracking contaminates groundwater.
There's no evidence.
They looked at it for two years, no evidence whatsoever that fracking contaminates groundwater.
But because the left is against the discovery of oil and gas, they'll simply lie about the destruction of the environment in the process of getting more oil and gas.
Because they hate it.
Why do they hate oil and gas, Mr. Lombard?
They hate oil and gas because it equals freedom.
It equals something the government is not providing.
The government doesn't provide oil, therefore there are no votes in it.
The government doesn't provide natural gas.
The private sector produces it.
The private sector is the enemy.
Just that simple.
The challenge for you is to believe it, folks, because that's who these people are.
Mr. Inhoff, Senator Inhoff said it's clear that the EPA did not base these three studies on sound science, the fracking allegations, or engage in a proper scientific process.
The agency's been using questionable authorities while usurping the rightful regulatory authority of states, meaning Texas.
If anybody's going to shut down range resources, it's Texas that does it.
Al Armanderas can't come in as an EPA, you know, little Nazi come in and do it.
But he did it.
EPA clearly went through with these investigations based on preconceived conclusions with the explicit goal of tying potential environmental harms to hydraulic fracturing.
Whether it exists or not.
There's a moratorium on drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, folks.
I don't know what more evidence anybody needs.
The Keystone Pipeline.
You have to have the courage to believe that's who these people are.
There are hundreds of thousands of jobs waiting for the Keystone Pipeline.
There's all kinds of new domestic oil.
We would be less dependent on Middle Eastern oil.
Obama's opposed to it.
Why?
Who cares why?
The fact is he's opposed to it.
That ought to be enough to disqualify him.
All right, to the phones.
If I don't if I don't get to the phones now, I might never.
Because I mean, I'm loaded here and I'm crunched.
I'm compressed.
I'm trying to get so much stuff in here.
We're going to start Pasadena, California.
This is Tamara, and I am glad you called.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
Good morning.
You are fired up.
And uh I had to call.
I was at the gym and I heard your opening comments about Spanks and Sarah Blakely.
So of course, as a woman entrepreneur, I had to call and share and enlighten you, I guess, really, about uh Sarah Blakely.
And there's a couple of quick points I want to make.
Number one, she started out selling business machines door to door.
She was in sales.
And in her mind, she said, There's gotta be a better way.
I live in America.
I've got to be able to come up with something that is gonna make a difference, right?
For myself, for other women in this country.
She saved five thousand dollars, and she started her business on her own terms with her own tenacity, hard work, positivity, and she didn't do it with the premise of oh, I'm gonna get rich and drive a fancy car and eat at the finest restaurant.
Wait a minute, what's wrong with that?
Hey, trust me, I'm an entrepreneur.
I'm a capitalist, baby, and I'm I'm f I want to follow in all the entrepreneurial.
What's wrong?
Wait a minute now, Tamra.
What's wrong with getting rich, driving a fancy car and eating at the finest rest?
Somebody has to, why not you?
Well, but my point is that she did it that her motivation was entrepreneurship, wanting to make a difference, be her own person and and and fulfill her dream.
And I think as a woman and an entrepreneur and getting ready to launch my own company, my business partner and I looked at Sarah Blakely, and we said she is a shining example for not just women who have a dream, but for men about what America is exactly right.
That is exactly right.
And I'm fired up because I'm so glad you finally got a chance to talk about her.
And I and because you know what?
I think it's great that she's a role model for people.
She's awesome.
She's awesome.
And you know what?
When you look at her, she exemplifies the exceptionalism that this country was founded on.
I am an American woman.
I still live in the land of the free and the home of the brave, and I still have opportunity to go big and fulfill my dreams.
I believe in America, and I believe in myself, and I want all your listeners, especially the new ones that you've gotten in the next six years to know we are gonna make a difference this election season.
Don't let anybody tell you differently.
Believe in yourself and it is our country, and I'm not going down without a fight.
You hear this passion, this passion is all over this country.
You bet.
Yes, it is all over this country.
I am convinced this passion is all over this country.
I love it.
Anyway, thank you, Rush, for highlighting her and and just highlighting the spirit of entrepreneurship.
You've given me such a great inspiration for today to keep at it and keep working, and it just it affirms exactly why I believe I have something to share.
Let me tell you what she's pushing.
You sound like you're an expert on Sarah Blakely, and I've I've done since I saw the story in the New York Post today, I did a little uh in in limited time.
I I tried to find out some things about her.
Is it is it true?
She's from Florida, by the way.
Uh is it is it true that what she really set out to do uh what was make pantyhose that weren't so hot.
Well uncomfortable, hot.
She she actually came up with the premise.
She used to have to cut her pantyhose because she had her favorite pair of white pants.
And as we all know, uh women, you have to be very careful in what your undergarments are, wearing white pants.
And she she Couldn't find the perfect undergarments for white pants.
And they were her favorite pants.
And she said, okay, there's no product out there.
I can make a better product because I know exactly what I want and what women are going to want.
That's exactly right.
She did it.
It's awesome.
And there's tons of women entrepreneurs that are doing and have done exactly her.
And she taught herself marketing from just reading books.
From books.
I love it.
It's just, I love this country.
I love America.
Because I don't care what any of the media is telling you.
This is why I listen to you, Rush.
Because you know what?
We can do it if you get rid of the noise and you focus.
Oh my goodness, we still can fulfill our dreams.
It's why people are dying to come to America.
Let's hold up the light of liberty.
Oh and show them.
See, I'm telling folks, that Tamara thing.
This passion is all over this country.
You're not hearing it because the mainstream media doesn't find people like Tamara.
They're out looking for people in misery and suffering.
They want to try to blame Boehner for or Bush or the Republicans.
But this kind of passion is all over this country, and it is waiting to be unleashed, and it will be.
Tamara, thanks much.
Great call.
Great to hear from you.
Dave in uh in Sherman Township, Pennsylvania.
Hi.
Hey, how are you doing?
I I believe you're going to see the largest Republican turnout ever in this election.
Why do you say that, Dave?
I I think that they're just gonna vote against Obama.
Normally you like you said before, people want to vote for somebody this time, they're gonna be voting against somebody.
There's millions of people that wanted to vote for Obama last time, and they did vote for him because they wanted to believe in this guy, and now they've seen what he really is, and they are going to come out in droves against him along with all Republicans in this country.
Okay, what about the thought that Romney doesn't inspire anybody that uh there's there's not a whole lot of of uh of uh enthusiasm uh behind Romney?
I just don't think it's gonna matter this time.
I mean, he does uh honestly he doesn't inspire me, but uh everybody I'm talking to is voting this time.
Everybody to talk to is gonna go out and vote this time.
And he he will I believe you at your dinner party when she said that uh it could be a landslide.
I think you got it.
I I see it coming.
Why does Romney not inspire you?
No wrong answer.
I'm just curious, doing a little market research here.
I I guess I'm just maybe I'm just skeptical of a Northeast Republican.
That could be that simple.
But okay, so you're skeptical of a Northeast Republican, but uh are you so skeptical that you and I've heard your call, I've heard what you say.
Uh I'm still gonna ask this.
Are you so skeptical of another Northeast Republican that you might not vote?
Oh, no, no, no, no, not at all.
Yeah.
Okay.
All right, okay.
That's good.
That's cool.
All right.
Dave, thanks much.
We'll take a brief time out here at the EIB network and resume shortly.
Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said, quote, no one knows, close quote, if gasoline prices in the U.S. will reach $9 a gallon.
He acknowledged the possibility is outside his control.
Salazar was talking to reporters.
He was asked if gasoline prices could reach $9 a gallon as they have uh in Greece.
I don't think anybody can speculate what'll happen with respect to oil prices and gas prices, because they're um part of the global economy.
What we see happening today, the influences first of unrest in places like the Middle East and Iran, which disrupt the markets, allow the futures markets to play on some of what they see.
Secondly, huge demand that you started seeing in places like China and India.
So nobody knows if the U.S. is headed to nine dollars a gallon.
No, nobody knows.
You imagine if George W. Bush had said, uh, nobody knows.
We might be headed to nine dollars.
Can you imagine the conniption fit?
I want to take you back to this program February twenty-seventh.
This year, mere weeks ago, talking about the Republican Party and uh it's uh they were angry, they weren't being public with their anger, but I was hearing about it through surrogates.
They were angry at me for talking about social issues.
They just don't talk about them, Rush.
The social issues.
Independents don't want to hear about abortionists.
please.
Here's what I said.
Republican establishment in panic over the fact I'm killing the party.
And you know how I'm killing the party?
By not relegating discussion of social issues to the ash heap.
They don't want it talked about.
Oh god.
Oh no.
They just can't handle it being discussed.
They think it's going to send the independence driving away, and the electoral history of this is anything but.
That's right.
The electoral history is.
And I was talking, there was a um a book.
The author of the book escapes me.
I'm having a metal block on the author of the book wrote a book about how social issues being predominant in the Republican Party has led to presidential victory.
Who was the author of the book?
It'll come to me.
And this was the point that I was making.
This is an illustration about how the inside of Beltway Republicans just out of touch and don't get it.
And how Northeastern liberal Republicans scared to death of the abortion issue.
When they win with it.
So, I want to follow this up with Brian Kilmeade today.
On Fox and Friends.
They just had a new Fox presidential poll out.
Listen to Killmead here.
Among independents, the key voting block, who would you vote for if the election was today?
Forty-six to 33, Mitt Romney, a dominantly say the key voting block.
See, that that's my pet peeve.
Jeffrey Bell wrote the book on social conservatism and how social conservatism has been predominant in years.
Republicans have won the presidency.
Jeff Bell.
That's right.
So here's Killmeat among Independents, the key voting block.
Who would you vote for if the election was today?
Romney up by 13 among independents, and that's after six weeks of this phony war on women stuff that was supposed to send independents running back to the Democrats.
Don't buy.
Don't believe the conventional wisdom.
Here is Rego in Fresno, California.
Hi, Rego.
Great to have you on the program.
Oh, great.
Great, Rush.
As Mark Levin would say, thank me very much for the phone call.
But anyways, you know, I really appreciate what you're doing, Rush.
I'm all with you.
But unfortunately, you're preaching to the educated and informed crowd.
You see, I'm a truck driver.
And I travel all over the Southwest from East Texas all the way to California.
And talking to the youth and the Hispanic vote, they actually believe that Obama's it.
They don't have anything negative to say about him.
Some of them, that's true.
There's no question, some of them that's true, but the polling day, Obama is losing ground in the youth vote.
We had two polls on that yesterday.
And the same thing is happening in the Hispanic vote.
There was a couple of big stories yesterday, Rigo, that the Hispanic vote is like any other voting block.
It's not monolithic.
And it's not automatic now, vast majority Obama.
Every voting group, every block, however you want to describe it, has people who voted for Obama who are now unhappy.
I don't know who they're talking to because I'm talking to them all the way across the Southwest.
Well, how many this?
Rigo.
Wait, here's the problem with anecdotals.
How many people are you talking to?
On a daily basis?
Millions, thousands?
How many are you talking to?
Well, from like I said, all up and down the 1010 route, at least.
Okay.
Tell me how it happens.
You can't talk to them when you're driving the truck.
No, no, but I'm a truck stop.
I'm a town.
I'm in restaurants.
I'm in all of this, and it's just unfortunate.
But uh I'm, you know, but here's the thing.
I said, you ever hear the saying that uh there's people that play the game, those that watch the game, and those that don't have a clue of what the game is being.
That's my next question to you, Rigo.
Did you ask them when was the last time they voted?
Oh, they voted for Obama.
All of them?
Just uh well, I'd say 75%.
But how many are we look at I'm not all I'm trying to do I understand you are giving me what is known as anecdotal evidence.
You're talking about your truck routes in the Southwest, and you're talking to a comparative handful of people, and you're extrapolating that to think that this represents the entire country.
Yes, I I understand.
But you know what?
I'm I'm very confident that as you were saying before, he may you know we're gonna win on a landslide.
But I am still so um how would you say I don't know if you call it scared.
Look, but I'm very you know uh I happen to live Rigo, you know you you you're you're you're describing people as uh the the the uninformed and all that.
I live in the second wealthiest zip code in the country, and plenty of these people here are blooming idiots, and they're gonna vote for Obama.
They think they're the smartest people in the world and they're blithering idiots.
So they're everywhere.
But we'll deal with it.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
Much more straight ahead here on the excellence in broadcasting network, Rush Limbaugh serving humanity, as usual, half my brain tied behind my back, just to make it uh fair.
We're interested in that here.
▲
Export Selection