All Episodes
Previous Next
April 11, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:54
April 11, 2012, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24 7 Podcast.
I actually don't want to start at the top here, but I've got no choice.
I'm talking to broadcast engineer about the uh audio soundbite roster I just got here.
You know, I'm I'm I'm I'm trying to have a nice day living my life, and all of a sudden I find out that Obama and Democrats are once again impugning the name and reputation of Ronald Reagan.
I'm gonna deal with it, but I'm gonna tell you, folks, the whole focus of the next number of months up to the election is Barack Obama and his record.
It's not Ronald Reagan, it's not Warren Buffett, it's not the Buffett rule, it's not any of these side shows.
The focus is gonna be Barack Obama and his dismal record of utter failure, and we're not gonna forget it here.
I'm not gonna be distracted, but at the same time, uh when Obama tries to use these diversions, we're gonna have to deal with it uh as as briefly and as poignantly as we can.
Great to have you here, Rush Limbaugh behind this golden EIB microphone here at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program 800-282-2882, and the email address, L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
So now we find out today that that uh that not only was Ronald Reagan for tax increases on the rich, uh Ronald Reagan was pro-abortion.
Have you ever stopped to realize this bunch of people, the Democrat Party, Barack Obama, they hate Reagan, they have always hated Reagan.
They they engage in revisionist history about the Reagan years.
But all of it when they need to move their agenda forward, when they need to marshal support for what they're trying to do, who do they invoke?
LBJ?
No.
Ted E. Kennedy?
No.
JFK?
No.
RFK?
No.
Bill Clinton?
No.
They invoke Ronald Reagan, the beloved Ronaldus Magnus.
Now, what does that tell you?
They have to take one of the most popular presidents in history, a Republican, a person with whom they have absolutely nothing in common and without any agreement whatsoever, and try to convince the American people.
Barack Obama is Ronald Reagan.
Ronald Reagan did what Obama's doing.
It is shameless.
It is offensive, and like everything else Obama is doing, it's a lie.
But here's the problem with this.
The Republican establishment, and we discussed this during the elongated primary process, The Republican establishment scared to death of conservatives, scared to death of a conservative nominee, because their formative lesson is the Goldwater landslide defeat.
That's what they think will happen, or would have happened had the nominee been an unabashed conservative.
So they're happy.
The Republican establishment is happy because now there won't be this massive landslide defeat because we don't have a conservative.
They do not look to 1980 and 1984 and see two massive landslide victories.
But it gets tiresome and it's uh it's frustrating at the same time.
We've talked about this countless times before.
Obama, last night, right here.
I mean, he was within a nine-iron, effectively, at least as Hankane hits him.
From where we are right now in Palm Beach Gardens, and he said, this election will probably have the biggest contrast that we have seen maybe since Johnson Goldwater of 64, maybe before that.
But for God's sake, folks, look around.
The U.S. today is not anything like it was in 1964 when Goldwater lost in a landslide.
The country does look almost exactly like it did in 1980 when Reagan trounced Carter.
That's the lesson.
The lesson here is that Obama is the second term of Jimmy Carter.
But here they try they they they they they uh they trot out Reagan and any other conservative that they think will help them remain in office.
Now, while Obama was here campaigning in Florida on the taxpayers' dime, he also said, here's the News.
We tried this for eight years before I took office.
We tried it.
It's not like we didn't try it.
At the beginning of the last decade, the wealthiest Americans got two huge tax cuts in 2001 and 2003.
And we were told the same thing we're being told now that's going to lead to faster job growth, going to lead to greater prosperity for everybody.
Guess what?
It didn't.
Guess what, Mr. President, it did.
The unemployment rate through most of the 1980s, well from 2003 on, 4.7%, 5%.
Job growth was through the roof.
Incomes were going up.
The economy was roaring back after a recession, after 9-11.
The Bush tax cuts worked exactly as they intend were intended to, and Obama knows it because during the lame duck session of what it was a couple of Christmases ago when the Bush tax cuts were set to expire.
Guess who it was?
Guess who it was who said we can't let the Bush tax tax cuts expire.
It would put too much pressure on the economy, take too much money out of people's pockets.
It was Obama.
So folks, he knows.
They all know on the left.
They all know that trickle-down economics works.
They all know that Reaganomics works.
That's why they're invoking it.
They all know that tax cuts work, and that's why they oppose it.
Because what's good for America is bad for them and their political party.
It did work.
You anybody want to I'll give you an opportunity.
You go back and you can relive the years 2002 through 2008, or you can relive the last three.
Now you tell me what works and what doesn't work.
You and I all know that what doesn't work is Obama.
What will never work is Obama.
But here he is, and this has been one of my brilliantly profound points the past week.
Obama is coming from the standpoint that this country was founded unjustly and immorally by the equivalent of the one percent back in the 1700s.
Our founding fathers were the equivalent of a Warren Buffett's and Bill Gates's back then.
And they they structured a country that saw to it that only they would have the opportunities for freedom and economic prosperity and so forth.
Nobody else would.
They rigged the system.
And it never worked.
That's what Obama did.
Never worked.
Not just the last ten years didn't work.
The last 200 plus years haven't worked.
That's what Obama's main thrust is.
That's what his main point.
This you're on your own economy, this trickle-down stuff.
Nah, never worked.
Never worked throughout 200 plus years.
This country has always been a fraud and an illusion.
It never worked.
What's real is what's happening now.
This is how people were intended to live.
This is how everybody in the rest of the world has always lived, and it's no different than the way we should live now.
And this is what Obama's doing, and the way he goes about this is shrinking the private sector, expanding government, taking money out of the private sector, shrinking it.
Everything's going according to plan, except during an election year.
Obama knows he can't be honest about that.
He will not win a thing, he will lose in a landslide.
So now guess what's time to invoke Ronald Reagan?
I remain fascinated how they hate Reagan, folks.
The Democrat Party, the American left, despise Reagan precisely because of his success.
Precisely because of his policies, precisely because of the fact that he was genuinely loved and adored by the American people.
You remember the Reagan funeral?
Remember the outpouring?
In Washington.
Millions of people, both places, lining both sides of the street.
The media covering it was dumbfounded, couldn't understand it.
Couldn't understand it in California.
They're the ones who have revised history.
They're the ones who've tried to write that Reagan hated the poor, that Reagan went over to Lafayette Park at night and took pork and Beans from the homeless walked back over to the White House in the kitchen, put them in the microwave, zapped them, and ate them and rubbed his tummy says, I'm glad they're starving.
That's the picture they tried to paint of Reagan.
And they thought everybody thought of Reagan that way.
He passes away, and an outpouring of love and respect and devotion from the people of this country actually shocked him.
Wasn't long after that Senator Kennedy passed away, and they were similarly shocked at how few people lined the streets of Washington.
They were shocked that it wasn't necessary to stop traffic in Washington for the Teddy Kennedy funeral procession.
So here we are in election year.
And the phony baloney plastic man and a good time rock and roller leftists know full well that what they heartily truthfully believe would be rejected in landslide proportions if they were to be honest about it.
So who do they invoke?
What do they invoke when it's time to win re-election?
Try to convince, and who do they I mean, Obama's target audience is the stupid, the ignorant, the uneducated, ill-educated.
Now co-opting Ronald Reagan.
Ronald Reagan, they have to cite Reagan.
If they're gonna win re-election, they have to somehow associate one of the most popular, respected, beloved presidents ever with their perverted, obscene, destructive policies.
If I if I had to, I could spend all day on this, but I'm not.
We've got some sound mice to support all this.
If your blood pressure's low and you need it up, you're the right place.
This is the day.
But never ever are we going to lose sight of how this election is going to be won, and that is the constant focus on the failure of Barack Obama, the constant focus on his record.
You sit tight, we'll be back before you know it, and continue with all the rest of today's program right after this.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day, Rush Lynboy, your guiding light.
Here at 800-282-2882.
Here I want to read to you uh ladies and gentlemen from one of Obama's books that we're told that he wrote, it is chapter seven of his first autobiography.
Obama has two, you see.
He's done so much as a community organizer as a lecturer and a ramble resident.
It takes two massive, massive volumes to catalog this incredible life led by Barack Obama.
The first book, Dreams from my father, page 54.
It's when Obama tells us why he got into politics.
1983, I decided to become a community organizer, writes the one.
There wasn't much detail to the idea.
I didn't know anybody making a living that way.
When classmates in college asked me just what it was a community organizer did, I couldn't answer them directly.
Instead, I'd pronounce on the need for change, change in the White House, where Reagan and his minions were carrying on their dirty deeds.
Change in the Congress, compliant and corrupt, change in the mood of the country, manic and self-absorbed.
Change won't come from the top, I would say.
Change will come from a mobilized grassroots.
And that's what I'll do.
I'm an organized black folks at the grassroots for change.
Democrats always run as conservatives, even Obama is gonna run as a conservative.
That's what he's trying to do here.
He so despised Reagan, it's what made him want to become a community organizer start coalescing and effervescing from the bottom up.
Yeah, when he gets in trouble, who does he invoke?
Ronaldus Magnus is out there saying in Palm Beach Gardens.
Which right?
Which red changes?
Bush, it didn't work.
It did work.
The Bush era tax cuts were followed by 52 consecutive months of job growth.
Fifty-two.
Obama doesn't have one policy that will make that happen.
Every policy Obama has in place is an obstacle to job creation.
The Bush era tax cuts were followed by 52 consecutive months of job growth.
That, by the way, is a record in U.S. history.
The Bush tax cuts helped to create more than eight million new jobs.
That's close to our record in the period of time and brought the unemployment rate down to 4.5%.
The Bush tax cuts worked better than even their biggest advocates dreamed they would work.
And Obama has the audacity here in Florida last night to tell people it didn't work.
These people, it's why, folks, you cannot.
It's why it's a mistake for Paul Ryan to start debating any assertion Obama makes.
You know the old adage about getting in an argument with a fool.
After not too long a time, people can't tell the difference.
The way to deal with this, you know, put some facts out there, but focus on the dismal failure that Obama is.
Four and a half percent unemployment rate, and even as low as 5% as the spring of 2008.
Do you realize in the spring of 2008, the election year, the unemployment rate was 5% as opposed to the so-called 8.2% today.
Yep, it didn't work, did it.
Phony.
That's what we're being asked to believe.
Let's go to the audio sound bites this morning, CNN's newsroom.
Here is how the anchorette Carol Costello reported President Obama speaking live at the White House this morning about the Buffett rule.
Let's go to the White House now.
Uh President Obama has begun speaking.
He's meeting with millionaires and their secretaries to push the Buffett rule.
He's meeting with millionaires and their secretaries to push the Buffett rule.
The Buffett rule.
Buffett's out there saying, I don't want any part of this.
All I was talking about was raising taxes on 50,000 people.
What is this?
He doesn't like me.
Well, he's not actually saying that.
He's probably thinking it.
But here President of the White House has begun speaking, meeting with millionaires and their secretaries.
That's the news.
That's President Obama 2012.
An absurd photo op.
Here's the president himself talking to the millionaires and their secretaries.
The people who've joined me here today are extremely successful.
Stop the tape.
Recuit.
Nobody joined Obama.
They were summoned.
Somebody called them.
And so we want you to come to the White House and be today's props.
People that joined me here today.
They were summoned.
The people who joined me here today are extremely successful.
They've created jobs and opportunity for thousands of Americans.
They're rightly proud of their success.
They understand, though, that for some time now, when compared to the middle class, they haven't been asked to do their fair share.
And they are here because they believe there's something deeply wrong and irresponsible about that.
The executives who are with me here today, not just behind me, but in the audience, agree with me.
They agree with Warren.
This should be fixed.
They in fact have brought some of their own assistance.
They agree with me.
They haven't been doing their fair share.
They hadn't been asked to do their fair share, and they're here because they believe it's something deeply wrong.
They are there because they're either deep in the woods, partisans for Obama, or they've been summoned there, or they're just a bunch of groupies.
But I'm going to, folks, anybody who volunteers to pay a higher tax rate, God bless them, let them do it, but keep their hands out of our pockets.
It's none of their business.
But this is the trick.
Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, people ask me throughout my life, how come all these rich guys run around Russia and they support tax increases and because it inoculates them from any criticism.
All Buffett and Gates have to do is come out in support of raising taxes on the rich and they're loved and adored and they get great media coverage and they become celebrities.
Trust me, folks, vast majority of people do not want to be criticized in the media.
They want to be loved and adored.
And in Buffett and Gates and these millionaires they're now inoculated.
Nobody's going to hate them for being millionaires.
They just showed up and asked for their taxes to be raised.
But you don't want these people next to you in a foxhole.
You don't want these people next to you in a battle to save the country because these people have demonstrated they'll sell it out in order to get great press coverage or adulation or no criticism period.
I think I know Obama's losing it folks I honestly think that there's a there's a problem things have not gone as planned.
The adulation and Obama is totally dependent on adulation.
We talk about these uh these millionaires and their secretaries and other wealthy people who publicly support tax cuts or tax increases because it inoculates them from criticism it keeps the people but pitchforks away from you Warren Buffett doesn't worry about his house being stormed by people because he's out there he's yeah I make too much.
Yeah yeah I don't pay enough taxes yeah my my secretary's getting ripped oh Warren me one of us.
Meanwhile Warren Buffett owes a billion dollars in back taxes.
Do you know that?
Warren Buffett owes one billion dollars in back taxes.
He is fighting it he doesn't think he should pay it but publicly he's out there saying I'm not paying enough in taxes and people go, oh Warren Buffett, man, he understands our play.
He is one of us.
And so Warren Buffett's inoculated from any criticism his compound trying to take his property away from him or revolting against him.
Same thing to Bill Gates same thing with all of them.
Same thing Kennedy family.
They never advocate publicly for the very things that made them wealthy.
They never advocate they live it in private as privately as possible.
They go about their business lives as privately as possible using every free market advantage they can.
When it comes time to be public about it, condemn that keeps the media awaychforks at bay gets them love and adulation from the media and Obama want the same thing.
Bill Clinton 70 well whoa no hundred and twenty thousand dollars a speech and Bill Clinton every chance he gets you know I don't need tax cut I'm I'm I'm wealthy now I Hillary and I we're doing pretty well you ever known anybody to brag about their wealth is not it's not becoming the Clintons are the first to do so.
Yeah I people have the kind of money I got I I don't need that tax cut.
He'll take it though he damn well takes it and he does everything he can to avoid paying as much tax as he can legally privately all these liberal Democrats live the life of the free market publicly they wouldn't dare advocate it and so as leaders they're worthless Bill Gates Warren Buffett could have a lot of value to this country.
Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, if they did a tour running around this country describing for people how they did it, inspiring and motivating people to seek heights that they didn't dream possible for themselves, you realize what good they could do for the country?
But do they choose that?
No.
They choose the path of safety, adulation, publicly condemning everything they have done in the country.
their private lives to be successful.
And as such great opportunities are missed.
But for them, it's a wonderful payoff.
They're loved and adored by the press.
They're loved and adored by the poor.
They're loved and adored by the middle class.
They're loved and adored by everybody.
And they don't have to live their lives in fear that somebody's going to come take their money from them or steal from them or what have you.
Other than the norms that any wealthy person goes through in that regard.
But they don't have to worry about public rage.
Occupy Wall Street will never show up at Bill Gates' house.
Occupy Wall Street will never show up at Warren Buffett's, but they will show up at AIG executives' house.
Or wherever Obama sends them.
Obama wants the same thing.
Obama's always had it.
Nobody's ever said no.
Lid a charmed life.
Whatever he wants, he's had.
Never had to work for much.
And he now talks about how he's wealthy, and he doesn't need these tax cuts.
He doesn't need those tax cuts.
He takes them.
All these millionaires, these uh yeah, I want to see how many of them walk out of the White House and head over to Treasury and write a check.
Because they don't think they're paying their fair share.
I'll bet you the answer is zero.
I'll bet you not one of these millionaires wrote a check in the White House or went over to Treasury to write one.
And I'll bet none of them call their accountant and say, look, before we file next week, uh, you know, add uh add a couple hundred thousand to my tax bill.
But it won't happen.
But they'll show up and they'll allow themselves to be used as props for the notion that they don't think they're paying enough.
This is all insulting.
And I think uh I really I I think Obama is I've seen these pictures.
Drudge has these pictures posted Obama supposedly wasting away to um nothing, skin and bones.
And I just think he needs to get out of the White House more, go eat places where Michelle isn't.
That's when he enjoys eating.
Uh maybe smoking, who knows?
Doesn't look good, doesn't seem happy.
None of this has worked out the way he intended.
Now he's got to invoke Ronald Reagan to have a chance at winning re-election.
Now he's reduced to making senseless, laughable claims with millionaires and their secretaries in the room.
He has to summon a bunch of Americans to the White House to sit still while he says to the nation that these people admit they're not paying their fair share.
The top one percent of wage earners in America, the top one percent of income pays 36.7% of all taxes.
The top ten percent pay seventy point five percent of all taxes.
Top 1% pays 36.7, top 10%, 70.5%, and they tell us that the rich aren't paying their fair share.
And the Democrats have been saying that for as long as I've been an adult.
And I was an adult at eight.
So that's a long, long time.
The median income in this country tax rates 15%, millionaires pay about 26%.
The alternative minimum tax, which is really the Buffett rule, the first Buffett rule.
It's all the AMT is, is the first Buffett rule.
They're just trying to add another AMT here.
The alternative minimum tax was first called the millionaire's tax.
And now what happened?
It hits everybody.
Well, not everybody, but more and more people are subjected to it each and every year.
And people who are nowhere near being millionaires are now subject to the alternative minimum tax.
And that's all the Buffett rule is.
That's all any new liberal idea.
It's a starting point, and liberal programs are never solutions.
They just exacerbate problems.
Our buddy Jim Pethacukis, American Enterprise Institute.
Here are some real Reagan rules for Obama.
Because what Obama's cherry picking.
Two things.
The media Democrats are trying to find when Reagan, when he was governor of California back in 1976, voted for abortion.
What they don't tell you is that Reagan said, you know, I didn't know what I was doing, that was the worst mistake.
I agonized, I lost sleep over that vote.
I should I I should never have done what I was doing.
I was too young.
I was inexperienced as a governor.
From that point on, he was as pro-life as any American ever has been.
And the second invocation of Reagan is that he agreed that uh millionaires ought to be paying higher taxes.
And he saw to it that they did by cutting their tax rates.
And they pay more taxes.
The rich, I just gave you the numbers.
Top 1% pays 36% of all taxes.
By the way, the bottom 48% pays nothing.
And Obama talks about fairness.
If we were really talking about fairness, Obama would drag representatives of the 48% not paying income tax.
You bring them in a room.
Say, guess what?
Days are over.
Your free ride is over.
I agree with Governor Christie.
You've got to get up off your couch.
Country can't survive with you sitting on your couch waiting for a check in the mail every week.
What's fair about 48% of Americans paying no income tax?
It's just so convoluted it's perverted.
And I think it's rooted in panic.
I think the regime is in utter panic.
And I don't believe this notion that Romney's behind Obama by big points in women.
That's from an ABC poll.
ABC was number 17 in accuracy in the 2008 presidential race.
They rated all polls throughout the presidential campaign, plus the final one, ABC 17th on the list in accuracy.
But they're all out there applauding, yeah, this war on women, boy, this Republican war on women.
What's really working?
What do these women really hate Romney?
You believe this.
We are to believe on January 6th, where there was no war on women.
And American women were just like any other citizens.
They're individuals, they're going about their lives, they're paying higher gas prices, they're losing their jobs, husbands are losing their jobs, their homes are underwater.
On January 7th, George Stephanopoulos asks Mitt Romney in a debate in Manchester, New Hampshire, well, you think contraception should be banned in Romney.
What?
I'm just asking you if you think contraception should be banned.
George, what are you talking about?
Nobody nobody's talking about it.
I just want to know, Governor, shouldn't the states have the right to ban contra.
Well, George, it's silly.
Nobody's talking.
And from that point on, there's been this Republican war on women.
Republicans want to take away women's birth control pills.
And starting on January 7th, you know what we're also to believe?
Starting at January 7th, every woman in this country started hating Republicans.
That night, the night of that debate, every woman in America started to understand that Mitt Romney or Santorum or whoever, Rush Limbaugh, wanted to take away their birth control pills.
And they all believed it.
And now it's worked so well that all those women now support Morocco Bob.
Do we are they really think we're that stupid?
You and I know, I know they do.
Well, I don't think they think we are.
I think most, they think most Americans are.
But they really, and particularly you women, they think you're that stupid.
And now they want us to believe.
They want us to believe that in a couple of months, out of the pure ether that women now hate Romney.
Just like that.
And why go?
Well, we got an ABC Washington Post poll here, proves it.
I don't buy it for a second.
I don't believe and it doesn't matter anyway.
Even if the poll's true, it's April 11th.
It doesn't matter right now.
Anyway, back to Pethacucus.
Some real Reagan rules for Obama.
Blame government, not business.
That was a Reagan rule.
Cut taxes and make the safety net more efficient.
Get government under control.
Obey the Constitution.
Don't forget to cut taxes.
Don't hate fossil fuels.
Don't forget to cut taxes.
Those are Reagan rules.
Protect human life.
Don't support infanticide as Obama did.
I mean, this is sick.
It is really pathetic, and I th I think they're flailing.
Each time they get in trouble, try to latch on to of all people.
You know, you people, Obama, the least you could do is honor Ted Kennedy and say that that's what you want to be.
Then you'd have to find Chris Dodd and the waitress and make a sandwich at a Washington restaurant, and you might gain some weight.
Who knows?
Also, coming up on the program today, the Associated Press, Supreme Court misunderstood at oral arguments.
Supreme Court didn't understand what was being said.
As Supreme Court's now stupid, a possible misunderstanding about Obama's health care overhaul could cloud Supreme Court deliberations of his faith.
These idiots that the Supreme Court didn't understand it.
They they didn't know what was going on.
Well, they it was a little bit too complex, uh, and and they they seem to be under the impression that the law does not allow most consumers to buy low-cost insurance.
They seem to misunderstand to understand that people had a choice to buy expensive or cheap policy.
They just didn't know.
So they might and then from ABC News, Snurdley, maybe C News, high gas prices.
Should you blame your bank?
I'll tell you why you should blame your bank in the next hour, but that's but uh uh that's the question here from who low cost insurance?
I think that's the fine, actually.
Uh uh, I don't I haven't I haven't read it all the way through.
Doesn't matter.
The point is Supreme Court is also stupid.
They misunderstood.
Oh no, we can have a big problem here.
What if they rule on this and it turns out they didn't know?
They didn't understand.
A 2700-page bill that nobody's read.
Here's Ray in Livermore, California.
Ray, I'm glad you called.
You're up first.
It's great to have you here.
Hi.
And it's an honor to speak with you, Raj.
Thank you, sir.
Great program and your wonderful staff.
Uh a quick point and then a question to you.
Uh it would seem to me that Obama uh should go after millionaires and billionaires, but maybe he should start in his own house, you know, with the government.
We could call it the Pelosi rule and go after some millionaires who made it on insider trading in Congress.
But um when Obama proposes uh doing away with the so-called Bush tax cuts, he's really saying um I want to go back to the Clinton tax hikes.
And so if we're gonna go back to the Clinton tax hike, I would in your opinion, wouldn't it be a wise move as Republicans to say if the Clinton tax hikes are good, so is the Clinton budget, and let's return spending to the level of the city.
In fact, I have that is brilliant.
It's why I wanted to take your call first, is because it's brilliant, it's very shrewd, and I have mentioned it before.
Not to take away your thunder here.
But uh you are you're right on the money with this.
I've I have mentioned this in the context of uh of spending.
Whenever there is a proposal to reduce government spending, Democrats start talking about these draconian cuts.
Why we can't, you can't cut the buttons all these and oh no, people would starve, the kids would starve, there would be no uh college student alone, you know.
Obama just went through the litany the other day.
I mean, it was it was I I don't remember specifically what it was, and the answer, well, you guys love the Clinton years.
That was some of the greatest economic times in the country's history.
You love the Clinton tax increases.
Clinton's one of the greatest presidents ever.
The country did great by your own claim.
The country was fine and dandy during the eight years of Clinton.
Let's go back to those spending levels.
That is an excellent point.
Of course, uh it's it's a rhetorical point because they're not going to respond to it.
But it's a um it's a it's a it's a great, great illustration.
Yeah, the capital gains reductions and all that exactly right, do everything.
Clinton, you know, instead of citing uh Reagan and uh all of his so-called uh tax increases on the rich, why not cite Clinton?
There's a reason for this.
Clinton is not as popular as they want you to believe.
Clinton is nowhere near in Reagan's league with the American people.
Clinton, no way, no how has that personal relationship and connection to the American people like Reagan did.
Of course, it would be impossible.
Clinton's a phony.
Reagan was genuine.
Anyway, Ray, I appreciate the call.
Thanks much.
I'm still chuckling.
I mean, to say that Obamacare is too nuanced for the Supreme Court to understand.
I just, I can't believe it.
All right, here it is, in my formerly nicotine-stained finger.
Muchel Obama.
It's a YouTube video.
She says, I am now more popular than the president because I was on iCarly.
So Mo I don't know what it is, but the point is, she says she's more popular than the president.
Ms. Obama, it's not that hard to be more popular than the president.
It isn't that big a deal.
And we'll be back.
▲
Export Selection