All Episodes
Previous Next
March 5, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:35
March 5, 2012, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi folks, great to have you back.
Rush Limbaugh, America's Real, Anchorman, America's truth detector, and the Doctor of Democracy, all combined, truly, in a one harmless, lovable little fuzzball.
Great to have you here.
Our telephone numbers 800-282-2882.
Email address Lrushbaugh EIBNet.com.
Now there's a story going on out there that the economy is roaring back.
And as part of the story that the economy is roaring back, that uh unemployment is going down.
Now, Gallup says that unemployment, the next report ought to be up around 9%, according to their data.
It seldom agrees with the number put out by the government, but that's what Gallup is saying.
And Gallup, over the recent months, has warned Democrats, as has Stanley Greenberg, a Democrat polster, has warned Democrats in Obama.
Look, don't try to make the case here that the economy's coming back and roaring back as a re-election issue.
It isn't going to work because it isn't roaring back.
People don't believe it and don't believe these claims of a virtual economic recovery because they're not living it.
So this story needs to be listened to in that uh in that context.
It's from the uh Wisconsin Journal Sentinel.
It starts out by saying Wisconsin desperately needs new jobs.
Alone among the 50 states, Wisconsin has lost private sector jobs for six straight months, raising the political and economic stakes if the next jobs are of the next jobs report, which is due Thursday for the month of January.
Even feeble job creation would bring a sense of relief to a recession weary state and a pro-business governor who campaigned on a promise to add 250,000 new private sector jobs in his current term.
Economist Stephen Deller, University of Wisconsin Madison said the rest of the nation's moving upwards.
We are one of the few states moving downward.
There's something wrong.
Then the next line says this.
The United States as a whole has added private sector jobs twenty-three months in a row, including almost a half million jobs in the past two months.
Now, let's accept the premise just for the heck of it.
Let's accept the premise that jobs are roaring back, except in Wisconsin.
What has been going on in Wisconsin for the past year?
What have most of us seen in Wisconsin the past year?
We've seen radical teachers unions and their antics in trying to bring down Governor Walker.
We have seen arguments over whether the citizens of Wisconsin ought to be forced to pay for increasing salaries for teachers and other public unionized employees.
While this unemployment in Wisconsin has gone on, demands are made against the unemployed and the people who are working in Wisconsin that they pay higher taxes to fund higher salaries for public sector unionized employees Wisconsin.
That's what we see.
You think that might be a factor?
Think it could be a factor in the in this assertion that there are not any new jobs being created.
If you, if you were a business owner with an option to either move to Wisconsin or expand in Wisconsin, and you look at the past year in Wisconsin, what would you be doing?
What would you what would what would you think about?
You're probably gonna say until this war going on with the unions is over one way or the other, I'm gonna look elsewhere.
If this recalled election against the governor works and the Democrat Union Complex is enhanced and enlarged, the climate isn't gonna change.
Scott Walker's fighting good fight.
Hope he wins.
But if the unions win, it's gonna get worse in Wisconsin.
Pure and simple.
And that's not an opinion.
That's absolute history.
Larry Flint is back from the Hill.com.
Larry Flint's on the trail for any dirt on congressional lawmakers and government officials.
He publishes Hustler Magazine.
He placed a full page ad in yesterday's Washington Post offering upwards of one million dollars for any information about infidelity, sexual impropriety, or corruption concerning a U.S. Senator, Congressperson, or prominent government official.
Now, what's unstated is that he will only use it if it's a Republican.
The ad says sources with documented evidence will be paid if Flint publishes the verified story.
He's asking for submissions by telephone or by email.
So he's got a million dollars floating around for dirt on lawmakers.
Why does it take a million dollars to motivate this?
Anyway, that's what he's doing.
Tennessee.
State election officials say that the small number of Tennesseans who did not have proper ID during early voting indicates that people are adjusting to a new law that requires them to have a photo ID to vote.
Others say the real test will be the general election in November.
Tennessee's 12-day early voting period ended last Tuesday, and during that time, election coordinator Mark Goyne said there were more than 200,000 voters.
And of the 200,000, only 46 showed up without a photo ID.
So that's such a small number for a brand new policy.
So far, the implementation of this law has gone smoothly.
However, Vanderbilt University political science professor Bruce Oppenheimer said the early voters are a bad sample of the general.
Of course, the early voters are a bad sample.
Of course they are, because they don't accurately reflect voters that tend to vote in the general election, such as the poor and minorities.
He said, How many Latinos and African Americans do you think are voting in a Republican presidential primary in Tennessee on Tuesday?
How many poor people, the groups who are voting in the Republican primary are not the people who are expected to be particularly disenfranchised by the new voter ID law.
Look at everything we have to have an ID for.
You can't get on an airplane without one, right?
You can't do part hardly anything without a photo ID now.
Except somehow requiring a photo ID to vote is discriminatory against the poor and minorities.
So here Tennessee's got this requirement, and there was not a meltdown.
Forty-six people out of 200,000.
Early voters.
There wasn't a meltdown.
There will be a meltdown now, since it was reported there wasn't a meltdown.
The agitators on this will make sure there is a meltdown on election day.
Flood the place with people who aren't even registered to begin with and therefore don't have a photo ID in a raise hell about it.
Predictable, that's exactly what's going to happen.
There was a headline in a French news agency report recently.
Global warming is making the world colder.
That's the headline.
So powerful is the effect of a trace gas that serves mainly as plant food that it can make the world cooler while simultaneously causing dangerous warming, calling it a one-stop shop for natural disasters, all of which can be reliably blamed on mankind.
The only solution to which is greater governmental control over our economies and daily lives.
This whole global warming business has been a hoax from the get-go.
It's been a hoax from the beginning, designed as simply another plank of the platform designed to grow government, force people to lose freedom and liberty, make them feel guilty about destroying the climate by virtue of the way they've lived their lives, but offer them salvation.
Drive tiny little cars they don't really want, pay higher taxes, agree that they've been reprobates, and then join forces against everybody else who doesn't buy into the hoax And pressure them.
That's what it's always been.
It's grand central station for expanding government.
And it's just gotten ridiculous now.
Global warming is making the world colder.
And there are people actually try to make that intellectual case.
Let's take a brief time out.
We'll come back and start squeezing in more of your phone calls right after this.
Okay, soundbites, audio sound bites start at number eight.
This was Sunday morning on CNN's Farid Zakaria GPS.
He spoke with Time Magazine economist Joe Klein about contraception, religious organizations.
Farid Zakaria says it seems clear that the raising of issues like contraception or the issue with regard to what Catholic charities could or could not provide, net net helping the Democrats because it's making a lot of independent women say, wait a minute, we don't want people telling us what contraceptives we can use.
And see, nobody is.
Nobody was telling anybody, women or otherwise, what contraceptives they could use.
Catholic Church was.
There were religious organizations.
Wait a minute, we don't believe in abortion, we don't believe in this, we're not going to provide it free of charge.
Constitution has a First Amendment, religious liberty.
They can't be forced to do this.
Obama said to hell with that and forced them.
The Catholic Church raised hell and the Obama's, okay, okay, okay, I'll back off.
I'll just make the insurance companies do it.
He doesn't have the constitutional authority to do either.
But there was nothing new going on here.
It wasn't as though the Catholic Church was making contraception available and then decided to stop it.
All of this is a pure unadulterated diversion and show to take away from what Obama did.
To camouflage or mask what Obama's doing, which is behaving extra constitutionally.
He does not have the constitutional authority to do this.
Anyway, the Democrats have succeeded in changing this whole discussion into the idea that there are Republicans that want to deny independent women contraception, whatever they wanted.
And that's what Farid Zakari is asking Joe Klein about is what Joe Klein said.
I think that the strongest case that the Republicans have that's been obscured by all of this craziness is that the regulatory state has gotten out of control.
And so they when you bring it down to contraception, you ask yourself why in a country where we don't require employers to provide health insurance should we require them to prov those who do provide health insurance to provide contraception.
Now I'm all in favor of contraception, but I think that this is a major overstepping of the state's role.
Whoa.
Joe Klein.
State controlled Time Magazine.
This is this is a bit of an overstep.
They're getting too regulatory here.
You don't seem like you believe this, Mr. Snergley.
Well, then why would he say it?
Why would he say it's worried about it?
Now I'll tell you why he said it.
Because I don't, I think all of this is hocus pocus that they think Obama's got a sh is a shoe in now.
This uh I I here, let's go play Scarborough.
Grab grab audio sunbite number seven.
This is Scarborough from this morning on his show on MSNBC.
I'll tell you what, I would go back to 1974.
I remember election night 74.
Democrats won everything.
I don't think the Republican Party has been this bad up.
Because even then, you could say, well, Haley's running the party.
Even in 09, you could say they're they're gonna be able to, you know.
I don't know.
This is a pathetic state that the party's in.
And this has been about as bad a month as the Republican Party's had since August of 1974, when Nixon resigned.
This is horrific.
It keeps getting worse.
Okay, so Joe Scarborough thinks that the Republican Party has descended into depths unseen since Watergate with all this.
Something that's fake, totally trumped up, not real.
Now the perception is that it's real, but it isn't real.
The Republicans do not want to do what they're being accused of doing.
They don't want to deny anybody contraception.
I think Joe Klein is not quite as committed, but he's on the same page as Stanley Greenberg.
He said, wait a minute, you guys.
You know, Greenberg's saying you can't expect to win reelection by lying about an economic recovery that isn't taking place when people are living the real economy.
They're not buying that it's roaring back.
And by the same token, contraception, this is something most people don't think the government ought to be involved in this anyway.
It is a limited few who think the government ought to be providing it, and that the government ought to be paying for it.
That's not commonplace.
Because contraception's a personal thing.
A lot of people don't even want to know others to know that they're using it.
Nor do they want to know how they're using it.
Nor do they want to know when, other than a condom, which can't hide.
This is not the big cause celeb that the Democrats and the media have made it out to be.
In the meantime, what Joe Klein, I think, is saying here, well, I'll just repeat his words.
Why, in a country where we do not require employers to provide health insurance, should we require those who do to provide contraception?
Where did this come from?
It's out of the blue.
He thinks it's a regulatory overreach.
And I think he's got the same kind of uh uh concern that Greenberg has.
That at some point they don't own the country on this stuff.
They don't own the country on the fact that we should go full-fledged 100% socialist.
That's all I think he's saying.
Cardinal Dolan, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, New York was in Hicksville, New York at the Holy Trinity High School at a convocation on critical issues affecting Catholic school teaching, and he delivered the keynote address, which is a portion of what he said.
I asked who's trying to impose what on who?
We're not trying to impose our teaching on anybody.
We're simply saying don't impose your teaching upon us and make us do as a church what we find unconscionable to do.
Bingo.
Cardinal Dolan.
Hey, we are the church.
You believe what we believe?
Come Sunday.
Come anytime.
But don't tell us what we've got to teach.
This is our religion.
We're not imposing anything on anybody.
We don't go out and drag them into St. Patrick, say, here, listen to this, and you can't leave here till you agree.
It's not happening.
The left that does that.
It's the left that uses intimidation.
It's a Democrats and the media that use the power of intimidation to get people to cave on their own morality.
To give it up.
All for the sake of avoiding confrontation or opposition.
All for the sake of avoiding feeling uncomfortable.
So he's exactly right.
Who's trying to impose what on who?
And this, I think is uh we we put it in order following Joe Klein, because I think they're on the same page here.
This is an overreach.
We now have, because of this trumped-up press conference made to look like a congressional hearing last week.
We now have the Democrat Party trying to force the Catholic Church or its universities and schools to dole out contraception, which they find unconscionable.
In other words, the government is stepping across the First Amendment and saying, you don't have religious liberty anymore.
You are going to do what we say.
Now that was the original intention of Darrell Ice's committee hearing.
And it was that hearing late in the day, or the day day before, that the Democrats wanted to get rid of an approved invited witness, Barry Lynn, and substituting with Sandra Fluck.
In ISA, the Republican chairman said, who is this?
We don't have time to find out who she is.
Does she have any expertise in any of this?
So he said no.
Carolyn Maloney Democrats had a fit and started charging discrimination, trogloditism, uh misogyny, Republicans don't care about women, Republicans aren't interested in women, blah, blah, blah.
And so they do their fake hearing made to look like a press conference, in which they try to make ISIS hearing look like what it was really about was denying women contraception.
It wasn't.
ISIS hearing was whether or not Obama had overstepped in demanding that churches and schools of the Catholic faith require or should be required to do this.
And Dolan said, wait a minute.
We're minding our own business one day, and all of a sudden the president tells us we have to violate our conscience.
Well, we're we're not going to violate our conscience.
And furthermore, we're not out demanding everybody live the way we suggest.
You're free to join.
You're free to practice.
You're free to learn.
Oh, we don't impose it on anybody other than our flock.
We do it in the form of teaching.
But there's even forgiveness in the church.
No forgiveness.
In the religion of liberalism.
Zilch Zero Nada.
This is no more, nothing more than Obama continuing his war on the bitter clingers.
In Obama's world, in the world of the statist and the socialist, faith in something other than government.
Your faith's supposed to be in him.
Your faith is supposed to be in government.
In everything they say and do.
But you have faith in yourself, your faith in your religion.
No, not so we're uh we're gonna take these steps slowly but surely, and we're gonna chip away at the foundation of these organizations, and we're gonna basically dissolve them.
And one of them's the Catholic Church.
And we're gonna do it by making it look like Catholic Church is trying to force women into slavery.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Back to the phones we go, Savannah, Georgia.
Brad High, welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
What a joy and what an honor.
Thanks for your time.
You bet, sir.
Well, um, I was uh uh you've already articulated well about uh the inconsistency uh inconsistencies and double standards for the media.
It's just uh when I'm listening or watching TV now, I really think that uh John Bailey has a sharp mind and a very articulate man.
But uh the last time, and it will be the last time ever watching, was when uh they had a clip of Sarah Palin on, and he was pantomiming Cunninglingus.
And uh I just uh I lost all track of any rationale he was having at the time.
So uh I just want to uh encourage you and uh uh on on your articulate ability to share with us uh the truth and the uh inconsistencies there, but I also want to say that uh that doesn't mean because it's inconsistent and because it's um uh double standard that we couldn't keep pointing it out.
No.
Um obviously we'll keep pointing it out.
It might at some point the fact that it exists um in and of itself have uh have have impact.
He means John Stewart, by the way, not John Daly of the Daily Show.
Now you understand what happens there.
When something potentially controversial happens on that show.
Well, wait a minute, we're a comedy show.
Back off.
And then on the other hand, when it is said that the Daily Show is the primary source of news and information for the college student crowd, then it's a news show.
So they get to go back and forth on that show as to whether they're entertainment, hey, back off, hey, lighten up.
You know, we're just a bunch of satirists here.
We're just making we're just telling jokes and so forth.
Uh so they have the uh ability to go back and forth uh between the two genres.
I do not ever pull that.
Well, I'm described alternately by the left as an entertainer or someday as the titular head of the Republican Party, whichever fits whatever they're uh attempting to accomplish uh that particular day.
Who's next?
Jackie South Jersey, great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush, how are you today?
Very good, thank you.
Thank you so much, longtime listener, first-time caller.
But earlier today, you had mentioned that Larry Flint uh has put up essentially a million dollars for what amounts to, you know, what appears to be a witch hunt.
It would appear to be, yes.
Yeah.
Um I am originally from Larry Flint's hometown.
That would be McGoffin County, Kentucky.
Right.
Near Cincinnati, isn't it?
Uh it's actually up in rural eastern Kentucky.
Okay.
And if you caught much of the news over the weekend, um, you'll see that West Liberty, Kentucky and Sayersville, Kentucky were devastated by the tornadoes that went through there Friday night.
Ah, yes, okay.
Since McGoffin County is Larry Flint's hometown, I would think that he would be better served, and I would love to challenge him to send uh a big portion of that money to his hometown to help rebuild it.
People's lives were destroyed, their homes are gone.
That's not gonna sell subscriptions to Hustler.
Uh you know what?
I don't really care about subscriptions to Hustler.
But he does.
The last time we heard from Larry Flint, I don't know if you remember this, but the last time we heard from Larry Flint, he offered Anthony Wiener a job after Andrew Breitbart exposed him on that phone scandal.
Well, that that sounds about par for the course, but uh, you know, uh, I think it's time to to look back and at his roots and give his hometown a helping hand.
So with that in mind, that's the challenge that I'm issuing to Mr. Flint.
Well, thanks very much.
I appreciate it.
What Flint is doing is committing uh a bit of a mistake.
He's going back to the same well.
He did this once before, or maybe many other times.
I think this is how he got Bob Livingston.
Bob Livingston was uh named to be the new speaker after Newt left.
And a uh I think it was Flint who uncovered that Bob Livingston had been conducting affairs, had affairs, and uh Livingston resigned, and so Flint successful once keep going back to it.
After a while, the uh situation requires something more, something newly creative, something a little bit different.
He's going back to the well here on this.
And of course, this just there may be something going on at Washington, I don't know about terms of this, but it it appears to be out of the blue.
And of course, we all know, folks, that it's aimed at Republicans.
Okay, we go back to the audio sound bites.
Let's see.
This business, Israel and Obama.
We're at audio soundbite number ten.
Uh, this morning in Washington, the White House, Obama met with Benjamin Netanyahou in the oval orifice.
Here's a little of what Obama said.
Our commitment to the security of Israel uh is rock solid.
And as I've said to the Prime Minister uh in every single one of our meetings, uh the United States will always have Israel's back when it comes to Israel's security.
This was Netanyahu.
Israel has the right, the sovereign right to make its own decisions.
I believe that's why you appreciate Mr. President that Israel must reserve the right to defend itself.
And after all, that's the very purpose of the Jewish state, to restore to the Jewish people control over our destiny.
And that's why my supreme responsibility as Prime Minister of Israel is to ensure that Israel remains the master of its fate.
Now that's an interesting back and forth.
Obama says, don't worry, BB, we got your back.
BB says, we'll take care of ourselves.
Nothing could have said thank you, Mr. President.
We've always relished our relationship with the United States.
Uh we carries it.
In fact, it's our most important ally and allied relationship in the world that we've ever had, and so BB didn't do that.
Obama says our commitment to the security of Israel is rock solid.
And as I've said to Bibi, every single one of our meetings will always have Israel's back when it comes to their security.
And Netanyahu says, okay, but we reserve the right to act on our own anyway.
Because the world is telling Israel, don't you do it.
Don't you dare attack Iran.
Don't you even think about it.
We won't be happy if you do.
The Russians are telling Israel that.
Iran is telling Israel that.
I believe even the United States has told Israel that.
Now yesterday at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference, Obama spoke and said this to those guys: Iran's leaders should understand that I do not have a policy of containment.
I have a policy to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
And as I have made clear time and again during the course of my presidency, I will not hesitate to use force when it is necessary to defend the United States and its interests.
And he continued.
Let's listen to this.
I would ask that we all remember the weightiness of these issues.
The stakes involved for Israel, for America, and for the world.
Already there's too much loose talk of war.
Over the last few weeks, such talk has only benefited the Iranian government by driving up the price of oil, which they depend on to fund their nuclear program.
For the sake of Israel's security, America's security, and the peace and security of the world.
Now is not the time for bluster.
Now's the time to let our increased pressure sink in.
and to sustain the broad international coalition we have built.
That's right.
Too much loose talk of war going on here, Obama says.
So he tells them his policy is not one of containment.
And even goes so far as almost threaten war if necessary.
story.
And then he condemns those threatening war.
As it's it's just it's unnecessary.
We gotta stop this bluster.
This loose talk.
Yeah, it's seeing I don't bluff.
Yeah.
I don't bluff.
Well, that that's a laugher.
Obama says I don't bluff.
What's all this with Iran?
Well, the Iranians think it's a bluff.
Pure and simple.
And BB, I go back, BB says, hey, fine, Mr. President, but we reserve the sovereign right to make our decisions.
And we will be back, folks, right after this.
Don't go anywhere.
Ha!
How are you?
Welcome back, Rush Limboy here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
I didn't see this.
I'm told that George Will said yesterday.
This would be on uh uh I guess the this week show.
Did you watch it, Snerdley?
No, no, no.
George Will said Republican leaders are afraid of Rush Limbaugh.
George Will's column was about the uh story about Will said.
I don't know if he was he joking?
Republican leaders are afraid of Rush Limbaugh.
He said they will say what I'm told is that George Will said they want to bomb Iran, but they're afraid of Rush Limbaugh.
What does that mean?
The Republican leader should bomb me?
I'll send him the GPS coordinates of my estate.
I don't know.
I I you think you'd make George Will happy if a Republicans bombed him.
Um here's what George Will.
This is the Mr. Boehner comes out and says Russia's language was inappropriate.
Using a salad fork for your entree, that's inappropriate, not this stuff.
And it was depressing because what it indicates is the Republican leaders are afraid of Rush Limbaugh.
They want to bomb Iran, but they're afraid of Rush Limbaugh.
He said that on uh on this week.
Afraid of me.
Um I know McCain is McCain hasn't been afraid of me.
It's inappropriate, it's unacceptable.
It's just it's it's it's it's in it's justn't.
No, it isn't.
He said if it is.
But whatever it is, it isn't.
Embarrassing.
It's embarrassing.
Or here at full speed 360.
Diana in Flinton, Michigan.
Welcome to the You know, I'm a guy on the radio.
What do I do?
I talk.
I put syllables together.
Sometimes they make sense.
There's called words.
And the words make sentences.
And there's fear of me.
Actually, the fear is of you.
That's if you want to know the truth, folks, the fear is of you.
Because there's so many of you.
That's the real source of the fear.
Diana and Flint, I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hi.
Well, hi.
Thank you for taking my call, Ray.
Yes, madam.
Um, first of all, thank you for the great service you do to our for our country every day on your radio show.
Thank you very much.
Also, what I wanted to talk about was um I listened to you a lot, and last Friday or last week, you spent three days talking about Susan Fluke and the situation with um contraception.
And you apologized over the weekend, and I agree for the harsh language, it was probably appropriate.
But I don't feel that you were entirely responsible for the situation.
I I feel a lot of the blame needs to be placed with Nancy Pelosi and President Obama.
Um, specifically because they put this person in a position to bring about this issue and to try to divert the focus of our country and a terrible economic situation on social issues.
And it's in three days we're talking about social issues.
And I was hoping that uh through the rest of the remainder of the year into the election, that we could focus more on the economy and what's happening with our constitution rather than on social issues.
Mm-hmm.
Well, the the social issues are by the the Democrats consider them uh gold mine.
They are uh where victory is to be held, they believe.
Now, I'm gonna be interviewing a guy named Jeff Bell, former Reagan administration official who has a new book out, the interviewing him this week for the Limbaugh Letter, the newsletter, it's the most widely read political newsletter across the fruited plain.
And he's uh looked at the statistics, election data, all kinds of things, and he has found that social issues, when prominent, are a winner in Republican presidential politics, not a loser.
But this is another one of the myths or alternate realities that's been created, or a bit of conventional wisdom that and even the Republicans believe this.
The Republican establishment, the liberal rhino republic, they all believe social issues, oh God, oh no.
They come up, that's uh that's instant death.
Oh, no, we don't have a prayer.
And the uh the Democrats love to bring them up because they know it creates a self-defeatism among Republicans.
It uh it dispirits them.
You know, I would I would say that what we're into here, and I I dubbed this wag the pill a couple of weeks ago.
Because remember now, all of this, Diana, it all started on on January 7th in New Hampshire.
There was a Republican presidential debate, and George Stephanopoulos asked Mitt Romney if he wanted to ban contraception.
Romney hadn't the slightest idea what he was talking about.
And George Will kept uh pushing it, kept going deeper and deeper.
Stephanopoulos, you have to go deeper and deeper, and Romney said, what are you what are you George?
Nobody wants to ban cont because the states could, but we're it's silly.
Nobody's talking about and the issue was born and wag the pill, just like Wag the Dog.
The movie, if you haven't seen the movie Wag the Dog, you should rent it.
It's all about it happened during the Clinton years, and it is all about faking a war that exists only on television in some foreign land.
And you get everybody reacting to it.
And the and the Justice Department chases down the architect of this, who happens to be Robert De Niro's character, and they you're missing.
There's the United States is not at war anywhere.
Oh, yes, there is.
I saw it on television.
I was right there on see, see, there's the war on T. They were producing it in a Hollywood soundstage.
It was a it was a it was a joke movie, it was serious, but had a it had a humor letterline.
This is Wag the Pill.
It's the same thing.
Creating a war over contraception that does not exist.
It didn't exist.
There was no move or push to ban contraception.
And the Republicans don't know what's hit them.
So the Democrats are faking the Republicans' war on women.
They're faking it, and everybody's believing that it's going on.
And the Republicans don't know how to deal with this.
Well that's it, folks.
Another exciting excursion into broadcast excellence is in the can.
Final question.
Where is all the talk about chilling free speech?
Where is all that?
▲
Export Selection