All Episodes
Previous Next
March 5, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:53
March 5, 2012, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host of this program documented to be almost always right, 99.7% of a time.
We are here for the Limboy Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
The telephone number, if you want to join us, 800-282-2882.
And the email address, if you want to go that route, is Rush.
Lrushbo at EIBNet.com.
So Vladimir Putin is back.
The KGB once again in charge of Russia.
He got rid of uh the diminutive Dmitry Medvedev, or Medv Medvied.
Well, no, he was the Prime Minister, the premier of the uh Grand Poo Bah over there on the side in the Kremlin.
Um I don't think he ever really left, but now he's re-elected with typical uh liberal election fraud being charged.
And he's actually this guy's going for the American audience.
He stood up there for the KGB guy crying.
You just have never seen that before.
The KGB does not shed tears.
And uh old Vlad's uh this is his fourth term, and he's up there uh uh as president.
He's up there crying over his uh good fortune or just unheard of for the KGB to uh to cry.
Anyway, he is there.
I want to move on.
There is a Republican election coming up.
There's a Republican primary going on.
Uh you may not know this, but uh uh one of the one of candidates is Mitt Romney, the former governor of uh Massachusetts, the other candidate is uh Rick Santorum, former senator from Texas.
Another candidate is uh Pennsylvania, right?
The other candidate, another candidate is Newt Gingrich, the uh former Speaker of the House, and there's some old guy, I can't remember his name.
There's four of them, but but those are the those are the three.
Excuse uh.
Oh, yeah, the uh that guy's from Texas, the other guy's from Texas.
That's right.
Anyway, uh and it's gotten quite vitriolic this uh this campaign.
And I saw something over the weekend uh ladies, actually, I think it was maybe free, it was Friday after the program was over, that a report came out that Mitt Romney, who's the author of Romney Care in Massachusetts, the state health care program, had uh defended the individual mandate for Obamacare.
The story I saw was that some time ago Romney had encouraged some uh was it Obama or somebody else to actually include a mandate in the national health care program.
Now, Governor Romney uh has said throughout the campaign that uh he would repeal Obamacare.
It's a whole different thing, it's 2200 pages versus Romney care, which is 70 pages.
This is a lot more to Obamacare that he would reject.
And he would repeal it, be the first thing that he would do.
Uh this is from June 13th of last year, so Manchester, New Hampshire, St. Anselm College was live on CNN.
It was a Republican uh candidate's debate, and during a segment on Romney care versus Obamacare, Romney said this.
Ours was a state plan, a state solution, and if people don't like it in our state, they can change it.
That's the nature of why states are the right place for this type of uh responsibility.
Now, I'm uh uh I'm I think I'm right.
I don't have the story in front of me, but I think Snerdley, did I read this over the weekend that somebody's found tape of Romney encouraging uh but did he encourage Obama?
Um I can't I can't recall specifically, but uh I I think it was uh Romney encouraged Obama to adopt a mandate in Obamacare.
That's what I really I shouldn't say that because I can't I've got a I mistakenly thought I printed it out and I didn't print it out.
But I think this is why Cookie gave me the soundbite.
Um state while opposing it.
Uh nationally, states have the right to do these kinds of things.
Uh There have been some endorsements that have come out for Romney.
One of them is Eric Cantor, one of the leaders in the House of Representatives of the Republican side, he was on Morning Joe today on MSNBC.
Scarborough said this weekend, oh, yeah, if an op-ed was released, it showed Mitt supported a national mandate.
I knew I'd seen it.
Yeah, that's right.
Here it is.
It's a 2009 USA Today op-ed that Romney wrote.
Health care is simply too important to the economy, to employment, and to America's families to be larded up and rushed through on an artificial deadline.
There's a better way, and the lessons we learned in Massachusetts could help Washington find it.
Now this mandate business, of course, is the reason, ladies and gentlemen, that the Obamacare legislation is now before the Supreme Court, whether or not that mandate is constitutional.
It clearly isn't.
I mean, the federal government cannot require that people buy a product or service.
It just can't.
Now, Supreme Court may change that and say, well, the way we look at it is they can.
The Obama regime is demanding that people buy health insurance, or if they don't, pay a fine.
And early on, the fine is very little.
So you would normally, if you're if you're young, and you don't have any thoughts of your immediate death or catastrophic illness, you forego buying the insurance that's required and instead pay the fine.
The fine much cheaper than an insurance policy.
So as a practical matter, that's what many young people will do.
And after so many years go by, the fine becomes much more expensive than the insurance is, which then is designed to force people to buy health insurance.
By that time, the private health insurance market will have been destroyed.
So the whole point of this mandate, with the cheap fines at the outset, is to ultimately force all of us onto government-provided insurance that we are required to buy.
Now the Supreme Court's hearing a case, the opponents of Obamacare say that the mandate's unconstitutional.
The regime is saying, wait, these are not fines, they're taxes.
And as such, we have the power to levy taxes.
And that's the brief Cliff Notes version of what's going on.
Here's more from the Romney op-ed.
Our experience, Massachusetts, also demonstrates that getting every citizen insured doesn't have to break the bank.
First, we established incentives for those who were uninsured to buy insurance using tax penalties, i.e., fines, as we did, or tax credits, as others have proposed, encourages free riders to take responsibility for themselves rather than pass their medical costs on to others.
This doesn't cost the government a single dollar.
So he's encouraging the mandate, essentially.
The free rider, the people I just described.
They're young, they don't have any thoughts of their imminent death or catastrophic illness, so they forgo the insurance.
And then when they do get sick and can't afford it, they go to the insurance or the emergency room or wherever, and by law they're covered, therefore they haven't paid for it, and there's outrage.
So how do we take care of this?
Well, the solution was the mandate.
You just make everybody buy insurance.
And originally, folks, even conservatives glommed on to that, and they did it for a very obvious upfront reason.
Conservatism is about self-reliance.
Conservatism is about personal responsibility.
And so if there is a mandate that you take care of it yourself instead of bleeding off everybody else.
It was only after the full scope of Obamacare was known that the reality said, wait a minute, this is unconstitutional.
The government can't do this.
And that's where we are.
So a lot of people, knewt, the Heritage Foundation, a number of people, when the mandate was first proposed, liked it because it forced the free riders to get in the system.
It forced personal responsibility and accountability.
But then when they saw how sweeping the rest of Obamacare was and the need to stop it, okay, wait a minute, that mandate is unconstitutional.
That's where we are.
All these people that initially supported the mandate, you can give them the benefit of the doubt.
If they were instinctively supporting it because it sounded good in a conservative context.
Self-reliance.
Self-responsibility.
Self-accountability.
So now that Romney has written this op-ed that it was been discovered, USA Today 2009, the Romney campaign is saying that, by the way, we we didn't mean it the way everybody's interpreting it.
We we didn't mean that Obama and the feds ought to put our mandate in there.
We were just talking about ways to deal with the free riders.
And of course, free writers irritate a lot of people.
So that's the latest controversy involving Romney.
Now back to back to Scarborough and and uh his program today had Eric Cantor of the House Republican leadership in Scarborough said this weekend an op-ed release showed Romney supported a national mandate.
How will the Republican base how are we going to get our arms around Mitt Romney now?
As far as the issue of Obamacare, Mitt Romney's been very clear.
He said he will sign a repeal of Obamacare.
He is not for uh it's taking effect uh in this country.
And you know, Joe, I carried the bill in the House to repeal Obamacare, so I look forward to uh serving uh in the role along uh with Mitt Romney to make sure that we in Congress join him once he's elected president to repeal Obamacare.
We've got to.
So Mika Bzinsky, the co-hostette, says, Well, look, it's clear that uh Romney's flipped on the issue, and it's maybe perhaps hard for some to understand exactly where he stands on this issue and some others.
Eric, fair enough.
Well, I mean, listen, if uh the process that he has gone through and he has arrived at the conclusion uh that uh what he felt was appropriate in Massachusetts is not now appropriate uh for the federal level.
Uh I take him at his word on that, and I will continue to work hard to do everything we can uh to repeal Obamacare, knowing full well the consequences uh if that bill really does go into effect.
Yesterday morning meet the press, David Gregory, when he was able to get people to talk about something other than me, asked Eric Cantor, you've not chosen sides here in this Republican nomination fight.
Are you prepared to say who you're with this morning?
The country's got to make a choice.
Who's gonna best be able to lead this economy back to a growth mode, create jobs so people can feel better about the future?
And I just think there's one candidate in the race who can do that, and that's Mitt Romney.
You know, Mitt Romney is is the only candidate in the race who's put forward a bold pro-growth, pro-jobs plan for the future.
So Eric Cantor has endorsed Romney and uh his uh pledge to repeal Obamacare and so forth.
That's on the record.
We gotta take a brief time out.
And sit tight, back before you know it.
Okay, let's go to the phones.
Once again, telephone numbers 800 282.
2882, we're gonna start Kalamazoo, Michigan with uh Ami, great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Yeah, that's Amy uh in French terms, but wait, hold on, hold ho hold hold just a second, Mike.
Is it Amy or Amy?
It's Ame, yeah.
Yeah.
I thought you said I just I just so upset through with th through this whole thing because it's in my first time in my whole life that I've been so embarrassed and disappointed in America.
I'm just so sick and tired of the double standard in society that these liberals can call Sarah Palin a sweat and a horror and get o totally get away with it.
And if any conservative with you know with the value that you have, you have to demand apology and and everything breaks loose.
Um I'm a let me just tell you the double standard has always existed and it always will.
That's that that is not going to change.
Everybody needs to understand that it it's it's it's bleating against the wind to um point out or be perceived as whining, not that you are, but double standard.
It's just the way of the world as it exists in this country right now.
Exactly.
Because I'm you know, I'm a business owner, a homeschooler, and a mother of two beautiful kids.
And you know, I'm just so you know upset about what's going on in America today.
I mean, you absolutely're losing the country.
You have to be able to do that.
We're losing the this this infuriates me, what is happening.
It outrages me, it scares me, it insults me.
It's all of this.
We're losing the country.
And what is frustrating to me is that so many people don't see it, and those who do are not willing to do anything about it.
Everybody's scared.
Everybody is frightened of what's going to happen to them if they've been everybody's afraid of the Democrat Party.
That's where the fear in this country is.
Everybody's afraid of the government.
They're afraid to speak out, they're afraid to do anything about it.
It's it's it's the uh path of least resistance for them.
But in the meantime, this this whole notion that society owes anybody what they want if they can say they're discriminated against for some reason.
When it gets to the point that we are providing the means and the finances or resources for social activities or whatever it is, I it it's it's scary to me.
It is really, really frightening.
Because my husband, I mean, he and him and I are we are busting our tails off to afford any you know food to put on our table.
And we have a strict budget, and I can't even afford to take my kids to McDonald's to a restaurant or even extra toys for my kids.
And here, you know, and and when I have to tell my kids, they're so disappointed, their eyes just say, Oh, gosh, Mom, we we understand, and my kid had 50 cents.
And he gives it to me because Mom, I know we're we're hurrying mom, and it just breaks my heart when I have to say that to them.
Well, it's hard.
It's this is all part of a culture uh deteriorating because fewer and fewer people and fewer and fewer businesses and fewer and fewer institutions actually have a moral core, or uh they're not willing to stand up for their moral core.
And you're talking about the double standard, and one of the greatest illustrations of it is that rappers can practically say anything they want about women.
And it's called art.
And they win awards for it.
I don't know about you.
I've I uh I have some television shows that I like and I tee vo.
And uh uh the P word that stands for urinate is common now.
Or when you're ticked off, you are p it's common.
The word bitch is common in sitcoms, in television dramas.
Every year, and I know language involves, but here's the i you know, I'm so naive in my hopefulness.
For twenty-three years I've been doing this on this stage, I've been four years prior to that in Sacramento.
So actually twenty-seven years I've been doing this, and every year, it's easy to see the cultural decline taking place, the rut right in front of our eyes.
And I keep for all of these years I've said to myself, okay, at some point's gonna bottom out.
People are gonna have had enough of it, and it's gonna end.
And it never does.
It's n it's not it's nowhere near bottoming out.
And and it's nowhere near people standing up saying, Hey, enough of it.
It's getting worse.
And it's going to continue to get worse.
You know, one of the things, uh, Andrew Breitbart is being uh lionized in his death, and he is being heralded in his death.
One of the things that the Breitbart Empire was focused on was pop culture.
Breitbart grew up in West Los Angeles.
He was surrounded by the epitome of wacko leftism today.
He grew up and was part of that.
Eventually, for a lot of reasons, had an awakening and escaped it.
And one of the reasons he put together his big empire, big journalism, big uh uh or Breitbart TV, uh big this, all those different websites.
One of the things that Andrew Breitbart was trying to do was to uh have conservatism uh make an impact in the pop culture.
He believed that the combination of the pop culture and the media were the source of all of the destruction and the uh deterioration of things in this country.
That the media had long ago abandoned their constitutional requirement, that they were now part of a leftist agenda, openly and upfront, honestly.
They were not even making any pretenses to more being objective or holding the powerful uh accountable long ago given that up.
And the pop culture is made up of people, I'm talking about the audience, who don't know.
Ninety percent of the substantive things going on in this country that will someday take from them their freedom.
They look at it as exactly they look at it as gaining stuff to the extent that they even care.
And those are the two areas that he was uh primarily interested in, and they're they're both extremely important.
And that's all part of the fact that there is a double standard.
But forget the double standard ever going away.
It never will.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Make no mistake.
That bothers them too.
Rush Limbaugh here on the cutting edge, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
I'll get back to the phones here in just a second.
A couple stories about guns.
The first one is from the Fort Worth Star Telegram.
Gun sales are booming.
Enthusiasts are stocking up on guns and ammo.
Some in the industry are wondering whether sales are spiking, as they did after Barack Obama won the presidency in 2008.
We're at the top of the roller coaster.
We're about to plummet down the side, said Duane Irwin, owner of the cheaper than dirt gun store in North Fort Worth, which set a sales record for the month of February.
It's fixing to happen again.
I don't know if it'll be the same extent that it was before, but I see it coming.
Look who the Republicans are trying to put up against Obama.
This guy said it's a Keystone cops.
People are getting scared.
This gun store owner, the Republicans are a bunch of Keystone cops and are getting scared.
People are terrified Obama's gonna get re-elected.
He won't care about getting votes next time.
He'll just pass whatever legislation he wants.
Some say that the uptick in sales at gun stores could also be linked to anything from the arrival of tax refunds to a spending spree by fans of the National Geographic Channel's Doomsday Preppers Show, which chronicles people preparing for the end of the world nationwide, more people than ever are buying guns.
And the Fort Worth Star Telegram does its best to make them all out to be a bunch of kooks.
It's into the world.
It's Obama's gonna get re-elected.
It's a Republicans or a bunch of Keystone cops.
The second gun story is from a very upset associated press.
Ah!
Yep, very upset associated press.
Federal judge in Maryland.
Wait till you hear this.
A federal judge in Maryland has ruled that Maryland's handgun permit law is unconstitutional.
Now wait, wait, it's not what you think.
In an opinion file today, U.S. District Judge Benson Everett legg says that a requirement that residents show, quote, a good and substantial reason, close quote, to carry a handgun infringes their Second Amendment right to bear arms.
He says it isn't sufficiently tailored to the state's public safety interests.
The plaintiff Raymond Woolard was denied a renewal of his permit in 2009 because he couldn't show that he had been subject to threats occurring beyond his residence.
Willard obtained a permit after fighting with an intruder in his uh Hampstead home in 2002.
The judge said it's unconstitutional to require the people to have this uh uh it's un it's can't it's unconstitutional to require them to give this reason.
Second Amendment doesn't say this.
Maryland folks.
U.S. District Judge Benson Everett legs as a requirement that residents show a good and substantial reason to carry a handgun infringes on their second amendment right.
They shouldn't have to show a good and substantial reason.
They get the permit granted on other grounds, but they shouldn't have to have that demand placed on them.
I'm shocked.
See that ruling coming out of Maryland.
Dan in Vernon Hills, Illinois.
Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
It's great to have you here.
Hello, Rush.
I appreciate the opportunity to thank both you and Miss Fluck um for clarifying something very important.
When I was uh in in high school about 20 years ago, uh I was a very confused and unhappy young man because they tried to teach us that men and women were identical and uh liberal and feminist social engineering, and you know, they um they had me very confused.
They taught me that the way I was raised to be a gentleman and open a door for a woman was demeaning to women, that being a man and asking a woman out was uh domineering and aggressive.
And I was very confused and unhappy.
What year was this?
What what what give me the years involved?
Uh uh ninety ninety-three.
Oh, ninety-three, because it sounds exactly like some of the stuff I went through as a young, newly virile guy in the 70s.
Exactly.
Exactly.
I after I graduated, I started listening to you.
I was driving around delivering Chinese food, and I found you on the radio.
And you told that exact story, and you talked about exactly that, opening a door for a lady.
And uh and I said, Holy cow, Rush Slimbaugh went through this.
And and you set me straight.
I was I was messed up and I I was confused.
It wasn't you know, they're they're trying to turn young men into something they're not.
They're trying to predators they're trying to turn us into predators.
Yes, and I felt like I was one.
You know, I felt like if I approached a woman, I was a monster just for just approaching them.
And uh listening to you set me straight, and I and I realized what was going on.
And now I I hear uh Miss Fluck and she has also kind of illuminated things things because if if I went up there as a man and basically said, Hey, look, uh, I can't afford all the sex I want.
Not to say that she wants tons of whatever, but if I said, hey, look, I want sex and I can't afford it, I think I would be made fun of.
And I'm not saying that calling names is good or bad, but I would be made fun of.
And I don't think I would, as a man, be portrayed as oh, he's a he's a 30-year-old like a kid.
She goes up and and she's portrayed like a kid because she's a woman.
So there's a double standard here.
Well, but she was she was advancing the Democrat cause to help uh take the focus away from what Obama was doing and turn it into a political issue where the Democrats could say Republicans are predators, uh hate women, like the way you grew up feeling.
Well, and she used them to advance th this woman, well, we've looked her up.
I mean, she's a she's uh uh a full-fledged activist for women's causes.
And she has been in Berkeley, she's traveled all over the place.
Cornell, she's she uh graduated from the women's studies courses theirs.
She's uh she's a full-fledged feminist activist.
And so she was advancing her cause.
The Democrats were advancing their cause when they call her up.
Uh but the whole point of it was to distract everybody from what Obama was actually doing.
But it works because she's a woman and and they're playing the they're they're playing it both ways.
When she wants her opportunity, and she wants when a woman wants to be treated equally, they can be.
When they are put upon, they can then go on to the different card.
Well, yes, this is now they can't.
This is true.
This is this is all about victimology.
Yeah, it's about and every minority, according to the left, every minority in the country is a victim of a tyrannical majority.
Every aspect of the Democrat Party agenda is to reverse that.
And what's happening here is that everybody is allowing these winds to blow them over.
And there's no resistance to it.
Very little at all.
Everybody's afraid.
I can't tell you the fear is palpable everywhere of speaking out, standing up, uh, either for yourself or for what you know is right, a moral core, whatever.
There's a palpable fear of uh this.
She was at Cornell from 1999 to 2003.
She got a B.S. in Policy analysis and management and feminist gender and sexuality studies.
And while she was there, she organized activities centered on the far left feminist and gender equity or equality movements.
And she she went to a lot of rallies supporting uh abortion, protests against the war in Iraq, efforts to recruit other women's right activists to uh to campus.
One of her pet causes is domestic violence.
So th th this is this is why the Democrats wanted at the last moment to call her as a witness to Darrell Ice's committee without Isa having a chance to vet her if I know who she was and what the point was when ISA said no, you asked for Barry Lynn.
And this is at 4 30 in the afternoon the day before the hearing.
You asked her Barry Lynn.
Now we don't have time.
She doesn't have any expertise in anything we're talking.
We're talking about here Obama and the president, and can he or can he not mandate contraception be provided by Catholic church and its schools and so forth?
What what's her expertise in this?
There is it.
We can't find any.
So the Democrats held their own press conference made to look like a subcommittee hearing.
And that's uh that's that's what all this is.
But it's all about vic the victimology and and uh you hit the nail on your head when you use the term social engineering.
That's what uh feminism is ultimately about.
And it did start with the premise that men and women are the same.
And the only thing that makes women subservient to men is that men have run things.
So we gotta get rid of men running as we're gonna run things.
Is it Betty Ferdan or what it was Betty Ferdan who wrote the feminine mystique?
When that book came out 30 or 40 years ago.
The the myth was that Betty Ferdan was a Long Island housewife minding her own business, finally just outraged by what she was seeing happen to women.
This was in the 60s.
And it later was discovered much later, not that it mattered then, but she was not just a long island housewife going to the score uh stu uh store for milk and eggs every day.
She was a full-fledged activist.
Anyway, I gotta take a break here.
Thanks much for the call.
Brief timeout, back with more right after this.
And we're back to the phones we go.
This is Orville in Columbus, Ohio.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hey there, Rush.
Great to talk to you.
Thank you very much, sir.
Uh ever happen, but uh everything's possible.
Um I just called to uh really encourage you to let you know how you influence people.
I'm uh almost 76, I'll be 76 at the end of the month.
And uh I suppose I was probably sixty years old the first time I heard you.
And some of the fellows where I worked were telling me about that guy on the radio that had a very large mouth and a very large ego.
Oh, yeah.
And I can't have one minute the other.
That's exactly right.
And I uh I basically I had to force myself a couple of times to hear you, and I thought, well, I want to hear a little more.
And after I listened for about uh uh well, it didn't take me real long, probably a couple months, and uh I think I was uh and uh and you might say a senior uh rush baby.
Uh I have been uh registered uh with our opposition party uh all my life, and since then I've uh I've changed uh my politics.
I've become somewhat of an armchair activist whenever I can.
Well, welcome home by exactly right.
And I I like to send out my emails to my senators and bug them to death.
And uh I've got a bunch of uh grandkids and kids that are uh on our side too, have uh one grandson in particular that uh just told me yesterday, he says uh uh that guy's my favorite, uh, talking about you.
And uh I just uh I'm proud of him, and I'm I'm just proud uh you know to be able to say that uh uh I am for uh our constitution.
I've I've signed up for the Constitution uh class at uh Yeah, Hillsdale.
Yep.
Well good for you and Primus.
Uh I'm yeah, I'm just uh full-fledged conservative now.
Well, I don't you enjoy life a little bit more.
Oh, I I enjoy life to the max.
You're not angry all the time.
You're not looking to be offended all the time, you're not outraged uh all the time.
I you have to be enjoying yourself a little bit more.
That's exactly it.
Uh I got a good outlook and I and I you know things do look pretty dismal, but I I think there's uh brighter days ahead, and uh uh we just have to hang in there.
I hope that uh a lot of the people wise up, even those on the other side, you know, and uh and uh and realize uh the damage that's been done in the last three and a half years, and uh No, let me tell you something.
This is a this is a hard cold reality that you're gonna have to face.
There may be some of those, but not very many.
The hardcore people you're talking about who represent our opposition believe fully, one hundred percent what Obama's doing.
There's been a seismic shift in that side of the aisle, the people of this country.
It's taken a while, but it's the result of decades of public education being corrupted.
Uh higher education curricula.
This is this is how these people have been educated.
It is how they have uh been informed.
They are f they're they're they're all in for this.
They are totally wrong about the loveliness that awaits them, the peace, the happiness, the utopia that awaits them because there isn't one.
But that's what they're in it for.
And they're they're they're all signed up.
Some of them are gonna see the light.
The uh real challenge here is to stop the growth of that side of the aisle in terms of political belief.
Um because that they're they're rooted.
That that's what they have to be defeated.
Not accommodated, not appeased, not uh compromised with, there's nothing there to compromise with.
They have to be defeated.
This is what so many people on our side are doubtful that the people in our upper echelon, the upper echelon of the Republican Party wonder if they're signed up for that.
Do they really understand the threat the country faces?
That's that's one of the big problems, and the lack of confidence on our side is purely based on no evidence that the leaders of our side of the things see it that way.
Time will tell.
But it's glad to have you.
We're glad to have you, and it's uh great to hear from you.
I'm glad you took the time.
Orville, here's Susan in Flushing, Michigan.
You're next in the EIB network.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
How are you?
Very good, thank you.
I am so honored to speak with you.
My husband said, Don't be nervous, and I can't be.
I'm just so honored.
I I listen to you all the time.
Um I just wanted to let you know that I went uh up to bat for you this weekend, and I have uh on Facebook with the niece who posted that she, you know, for people to stop their support of you and all this.
And I just I I've been sat back all these years and watched her post all her liberal things, and I never say a word because I don't want to ruffle feathers.
And I'm just so tired of having to sit back and not say what I believe, and so I did, and I told her that, you know, uh that it was wrong that we should not have to um pay for these people who there's such a thing as self-control and supporting yourself, but we have been b we're becoming such we're not the land of the free.
They want it to be the land of the free for all.
And I'm just really upset with that.
And um the double standards are obvious in the response from her friends that posted on here um the one girl saying that uh birth control isn't just for college skanks.
Now, what is the difference between a college skank and a slut?
I don't understand.
Is there a difference?
Oh, no, what w what they can say what they want.
They can say this is and you're and that's never going to change.
They can say that.
They can say what they can describe themselves that way.
They can describe others that way.
They can do it.
That's the double standard.
There doesn't have to be a difference at all.
We'll be back.
Don't go away, folks.
It's the fastest three hours in media.
And two of them are already gone.
We've got one more to go here as we kick off a full week of broadcast excellence.
Wisconsin missing out on whatever job gains are occurring out there.
This from the Milwaukee Urinal Sentinel newspaper.
We'll have details coming up, plus lots more sound bites involving lots of other stuff.
Sit tight, folks.
▲
Export Selection