All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 9, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
38:00
February 9, 2012, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hiya, folks, how are you?
Greetings and welcome.
Great to have you back as the week just continues to roll on.
It's the fastest week in media, and it's the fastest three hours in media.
And of course, it goes by so fast because the show is so good.
You know it and I know it.
Great to have you here, as always.
Telephone number, if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882, the email address, Lrushbow at EIB net.com.
We are in Los Angeles all this week.
Really unfortunate, too.
You know, I um this urge to go out to the beach, throw a football around, throw a frisbee.
People know that I have this uh urge now and then I see a beach, I want to go out there.
Throw a fisbee, uh, maybe maybe football around, but you can't.
Get the the Los Angeles County has just passed a law which fines people a thousand dollars for throwing a frisbee or a football on any of the county beaches.
I mean, I mean, this is the encroachment of soft tyranny.
Can you believe you can't throw a football or a frisbee on a beach?
What are they gonna do next?
You know, ban volleyball on the beach?
Well, I mean, that's that's that it's a ball in the air, and it's being hit.
Other California news out there trying to keep you posted on things that we discover while we are on location.
You see that the poster couple for gay marriage in California getting a divorce.
You see that?
It's true, ladies and gentlemen.
Yet it's two women, two women, they were among the first 14 same-sex couples who got married on the day the ban was lifted in California back in June of 2008.
So they uh I guess the national average, three and a half years, is what is what their marriage uh lasted.
Which maybe it's the California average.
I'm I'm not sure.
But I wonder if they designated one of them the husband so that he gets all the blame and has to pay all the alimony.
How does that work?
I wonder if we'll find out as the news covers this uh groundbreaking event, uh the first divorce of the first gay marriage couple.
Yep, it's uh uh a thousand.
I'm not kidding, Snerdley doesn't believe me.
A thousand dollars for anyone who throws a football or a frisbee on any beach in Los Angeles County.
I don't know what the rationale is.
The updated rules now prohibit any person to cast, toss, throw, kick, or roll any object other than a beach ball or volleyball upon or over any beach between Memorial Day and Labor Day.
I uh look at it's it's it's classic liberals.
It's uh they're trying to make everybody safe.
There are too many people probably getting hurt.
Who knows uh what it is?
Have you heard the great Oh, by the way, folks?
This is the first day of CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Conference, their weekend convention, and this is the what is the second anniversary, I think, of my uh CPAC speech, which is one for the ages.
And since this is the um uh that speech actually occurred on a Saturday, it was my first national address, first address to the nation on television.
We're gonna go back and relive some highlights of that uh at some point during the program.
I'm not sure when, because we do everything on the fly here, but at some point we'll go back and relive some of the highlights and some of the post-speech commentary that took place all across the uh the cable networks.
Marco Rubio spoke today and brought the house to Marco Rubio went just right at Obama.
Practically, not all, but practically all of uh Marco Rubio's address was aimed right at Barack Obama.
This is a roadmap for whoever ends up being our nominee.
Terrific speech uh by Marco Rubio, so we have that coming up.
Have you heard the uh the great news that there is so much the global warming hoax finally officially blown up now.
One of the early signatories to the UN IPCC deal has backed out of it totally, says it's absurd.
Uh he feels like he's been duped.
He has written a book about how he's been duped, and the uh uh German magazine Der Spiegel, or is it Der Spiegel?
And Now they pronounce Der Spiegel.
Well, they did an interview with the guy, and they were, you could just tell, even in reading the transcript of the uh of the interview, uh, they did snarky.
The guy from Der Spiegel could not believe what he was hearing.
Even from one of the previously foremost trusted members of the man-made global warming community.
Okay, I was at CPAC in 2000.
Yeah, 2009, since it's the third anniversary.
I was there six weeks after uh Obama was immaculated.
So there's uh there's that news.
New York hotel maids are gonna be given panic buttons in case French rapists show up or Democrat politicians.
Uh large New York hotels plan to equip their housekeepers and staff with portable alarms so they can get help quickly in case of trouble.
Any staff member uh who must enter guest rooms, such as maids, waiters, mini-bar attendants will be given the panic buttons within the next year, said Lisa Linden, the spokeswoman for the Hotel Association of New York, she declined to uh link the electronic alarms to the case of uh Dominique Strauss Kahn, a former IMF chief who was accused of sexually assaulting a maid at the Sofatel in New York, which is where we hung out prior to the Rush to Excellence tour in New York last year.
We got uh a couple of rooms at the Sofa Tell on purpose.
I wanted to see that I, if uh maid would come in and attack me.
But that didn't happen because we didn't register the rooms in my name, so none of the maids knew that I was there.
Uh, and I unless they saw me go in, but they still didn't do anything.
So panic, panic buttons for New York hotel maids to you never know when John Ebert's gonna be in town, uh, member of the Kennedy family, Dominique Strauss Kahn, it's uh Elliot Spitzer, uh Wiener.
You never know when these guys are in town and decide to shack up uh check in, and it's uh probably a good move.
Also on the foreclosure front, big news here.
Eric Holder and the attorney generals from four or attorneys general from 42 states have shaken down the country's mortgage lenders for 25 billion dollars.
This uh folks, have you ever heard of um uh uh the the the this whole notion of of uh these predatory lenders and and and people being tricked into taking out a mortgage?
Have you ever heard of that happening?
People wandering innocently by a bank on the street, and and some guy inside the bank with a hook grabs them in, okay, pal, you're taking out a mortgage.
You ever heard that's what the regime wants us to believe happened with this?
So, as part of a campaign effort here, re-election effort, $25 billion from the country's mortgage lenders to give to customers who were hit upon and forced under duress to take out a mortgage.
This what was that?
Can you get a piece?
Perhaps I think everybody's share comes out to $2,000.
Is uh if I if I'm reading.
You might get paid off $2,000 here as a if I'm reading it right.
Now, what this is, folks, is social justice at work.
Because after all, after all, the banks were forced by the government at the point of a gun to loan to people they knew couldn't afford the mortgages.
That's what really happened.
That's the root of the subprime mortgage crisis.
It was the government forcing the banks to lend money to people that had never had a chance, would never be able to repay the loans.
Social justice, uh, affordable housing, the so-called good intentions, and don't judge us on the failure of our results.
So now the banks have to pay the price for making those bad loans.
This is all part of continuing the ruse that the banks were the originators of this scandal and the originators of the problem.
And so now there's a $25 billion shakedown.
I'm gonna tell you, Snerdley, you can apply for it, but I'm gonna tell all of you mortgage people, you are not gonna see a dime.
This is nothing but a slush fund.
What Obama has done is gone to the bank because they're having trouble fundraising.
They're nowhere near their billion dollars they've been bragging about.
You ought to see what they're gonna do at their convention.
They're gonna charge what is it, um what do I read a million dollars for a skybox?
Million dollar donation or something like that to witness Obama's acceptance speech.
I think there's a million dollar charge or donation for something.
But clearly, the Democrat National Convention closing night for Obama's acceptance will be accessible primarily only to the 1%.
They're going to be the only people with the money to get in there, at least in a highfalutin way.
So back to this foreclosure business.
The banks were forced by the government at the point of a gun.
Janet Reno threatening them with investigations if they didn't participate in the program.
So they had to lend money to people that could not afford mortgage.
So now the banks have to pay the price for making these bad loans, see?
The banks, these evil, rotten bankers who tricked people into taking out a mortgage.
I still want you to visualize that.
I want you to visualize how in your own life, how you could be tricked into taking out a mortgage.
But the rules must continue.
So the banks have to now pay again.
They've got to pay $25 billion.
I'm told that somebody in the regime was actually fighting for $300 billion for the banks.
And they said now that's that's that's that's too much.
That's a big overreach.
We're gonna have problems.
We'll settle for $25 billion.
Nobody will have a problem with that.
Now the banks are gonna have to give $25 billion ostensibly now to the people who should have never gotten these loans in the first place.
People are underwater who were foreclosed on textbook cases, social justice.
This is a you hear the term, this is exactly how it manifests itself.
Now, well, no, he does have a stash.
He just he's one once again, what what you have here is the force of government threatening the banks.
The attorney general, uh Eric Holder getting and the attorneys general to 42 states, i.e.
the government, calling on the banks, hey, guess what we need from you, gang?
We need a grand aggregate here at $25 billion.
What if we don't pay?
You don't want to know if you don't pay.
It's a shakedown.
Now, this is Obama servicing his constituents.
He is fulfilling that campaign promise he made to pay their mortgages.
And I you may think, come on, Russia didn't promise that.
You we ought to dig out sound bites from one of his early town halls in 2009, the famous one that was in, I think, Tampa, where a woman who it turned out had a couple of houses or whatever stood up and wanted a new kitchen and wanted a new, thought that's what the election of Obama meant.
That's what she thought it meant.
I'm sure a lot of people have voted for Obama, thought that's what their lives held in store for them.
Obama was gonna give them a house.
Obama's gonna make sure that all the transgressions and all the discrimination and all the evil that had been perpetrated against these people in all of these years since the country's gonna be fixed here, Obama's gonna make sure they get what they've been denied.
That's what they thought.
They even showed up at Tom Halls and asked him.
But I as I said previously mere moments ago, and I think quite accurately will be um shocked if any of these people ever see any of that $25 billion.
It's just gonna get laundered back to the Democrat National Committee, which most union salaries end up being laundered back, at least a percentage of them, to the Democrat National Committee.
That's where all of this kind of money, most of it ends up ultimately.
But we're told that one million underwater homeowners could be eligible for as much.
Oh, it's 20,000 snerdly, I'm sorry, I said two thousand.
That's that's what that's what the news is.
That that's that's what if you're underwatered, if uh if you uh victim of predatory lending, what they're gonna tell you is if you're one of the one million underwater homeowners, you could be eligible.
Not that you're automatically qualified, but you could be eligible for as much as twenty thousand dollars in relief of the principle you owed, not the interest, in relief of the principle that you uh that you owe.
Now, even if, let's just extrapolate this, Let's play this out.
Even if that miracle should happen, and it won't.
Where's the justice in it?
Why should people be rewarded for being behind in their house payments?
Why?
Just because they shouldn't have been lent the money in the first place.
Why should the rest of us, including responsible homeowners and renters, have to pay higher ATM fees and banking fees?
Because that's where the $25 billion is going to come from.
You think the bank's just going to give it up?
Wait till you see what happens to your checking account service fee, your ATM fee, your credit card issuance fee, whatever.
There are going to be a series of fees added to your banking experience to pay for this $25 billion.
And why?
Why should you have to pay for this?
Plus, there's a story here in the stack, somewhat down that's been learned here that the government, i.e.
taxpayers, is paying for cell phone service for the poor.
We're actually paying the bills.
We are paying it, not just landline telephones for rural people.
Now we're paying cell phone charges for the very poor and the moderately poor and the not really poor.
And it's all part of this a great story on the on dependence in this country and how many people have become dependent and uh how so and on what, as I say, we're loaded with stuff that's gonna be a barn burner today as we uh as we go through it all.
Now, again, out of curiosity, I just I want to let this go.
When I ask this again, have any of you ever met anyone who was tricked into a mortgage?
A lot of you have people who live in homes that they're paying a mortgage on.
How many of them?
I'm sure you've talked to them.
How many of them have told you they were tricked?
Not with the terms of the mortgage, not the interest rate or but tricked into getting one.
How many of these people are?
This is what they want us to believe.
The regime wants us to believe there's some innocent, clean and pure as the wind-driven snow people out there minding their own business.
Some evil bankers came along and tricked them into taking out a mortgage.
That's the basic claim that these evil bankers, who are all big supporters of Obama, the Democrat Party, JP Morgan Chase, uh, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, Bank of America, they tricked poor people into applying for mortgages.
They tricked people into lying about their incomes and assets.
And they used robo signing.
You ever heard of robo signing?
You have?
You know what you know what robo signing is?
I didn't know what it was.
I had to dig deep and find out.
You know where the term comes from?
What it really means?
Robo signing is a term that was coined by a foreclosure lawyer in Florida way back in October of 2011.
It was just made up out of whole cloth, and it refers to imaginary evil bankers who uh who they claim didn't read all the documents they signed when they gave mortgages to these poor people that they tricked.
Normally we hear about the lender not reading the in this case, the banks didn't read their own documents.
As though we're supposed to the banks prepare the documents, they're legal teams, but nobody at the bank read the document.
They just robo signed these things.
In other words, the evil mortgage lenders might not have verified all the information that was put down in some mortgage applications.
Isn't that criminal?
So these robo signers ought to go to jail for not having been more thorough in preventing poor people from getting loans, even though at the exact same time the federal government was twisting their arms to give out even more loans to poor people.
I gotta take a break here.
We were well underway on today's excursion into broadcast excellence.
Sit back and we'll continue before you know it.
By the way, on this foreclosure story, just one more thing on this.
If you'll notice all of the drive-by's reporting on today's foreclosure settlement, always list ally financial.
A L-L-Y, maybe pronounced Ali, but if it was a name, it'd be Ally, but ally Financial as one of the top five banks involved.
Ally Financial gonna be forced to pony up the $25 billion.
They never bother to tell you that Ally Financial is really General Motors.
Ally Financial is GMAC.
That's General Motors' lending arm.
They changed their name from GMAC in 2010 to Ally Financial.
Unless we forget, folks, GMAC was bailed out to the tune of $12.5 billion in the original bailout in 2008, late in that year.
Now, as of January 2012, Ally Financial or General Motors Acceptance Corporation still owed the U.S. taxpayer $12 billion.
So today's deal means that we, the American taxpayers, will now also have to pay for their share of the $25 billion shakedown.
Just to close the loop on all of this.
Now there's a story been digested, written in a number of places.
First from the Heritage Foundation, dependence on government at an all-time high.
It's from Patrick Tyrrell at the Heritage Foundation.
And there's a actually this is a companion piece to a CNN story from earlier in the week about how one-third of Americans are on means-tested government programs.
The 2012 Index of Dependence on Government released today should be a wake-up call for America, published by the Heritage Foundation for past 10 years.
The index tracks the growth in government dependence dating back to the early 60s.
This year's edition shows an alarming trend with some incredible facts about dependence on government at an all-time high.
Back with details in a moment.
That's right, my friends.
According to the Heritage Foundation, dependency is up 7.5% the past two years under Obama.
And you have to ask, how can that be?
We've got millions of jobs being created out there.
The administration's going to project for 2012, 2 million jobs, net addition, 2.2 million jobs in the last 12 months, 3.7 million added in 23 months, net job growth.
That's what they're putting out there.
That's the regime is telling us they've created 3.7 million jobs since they took office with their stimulus bill.
And yet government dependence is up.
Higher than ever, according to the Heritage Foundation, one in five Americans, which is the highest in the nation's history, 20% relies on the federal government for everything.
20% rely on the federal government for everything.
Housing, health care, food stamps, college tuition, and retirement assistance.
To put that 20% to a number, that's more than 67.3 million Americans who receive subsidies from Washington.
And how do you think they vote?
And for whom do you think they vote?
20% totally supported by the federal government.
Government dependency jumped 8.1% in the past year with the most assistance going toward housing, health and welfare, and retirement.
Retirement.
The federal government spent more taxpayer dollars than ever before in 2011 to subsidize Americans.
The average individual who relies on Washington could receive benefits valued at $32,748.
That's more than the nation's average disposable personal income, which is $32,400.
The average disposable personal income, $32.4,000.
And the average individual who relies on Washington could receive benefits valued at $32,700.
No wonder so many people are leaving the workforce.
Why work when you can get this?
At the same time, nearly half of the American population, 49.5% now does not pay any federal income tax.
And none of this is accidental.
None of this is coincidence.
This has all been part of a grand design.
Actually started back in days at Woodrow Wilson, but really given a kickstart by FDR.
As of now, according to the Heritage Foundation, which tracks this, documents it, keeps the data.
It's it is inarguable.
70% of the federal government's budget goes to individual assistance programs.
And you hear from the regime about all the money we're wasting on wars.
And you hear it from Ron Paul.
They got too many wars.
We've got to stop all the wars.
And yet 70% of the federal government's budget goes to individual assistance programs up dramatically in just the past few years.
That's not only is that astonishing, it is unsustainable.
Now, here's the uh CNN report that I referenced uh earlier.
It's from earlier this week.
And it's it's posted at CNN under a section called the New American Dream.
That's what the it's it's a story on means-based assistance from the government.
And the number is 33%.
One third of Americans get means-based assistance.
And that is reported by CNN under the title The New American Dream.
Did you ever think you would see the day when more than a third of Americans were dependent on the so-called social safety net?
Twenty percent live entirely on government subsidy.
Twenty percent.
One out of five, two out of ten, however you can best visualize this, live entirely off the government.
I uh uh federal government sent out a record, get this trillion dollars to individuals in twenty ten.
That's up seventy-five percent from two thousand.
Not only is that shocking, it's unsustainable.
Use the favorite word of the left.
Federal government sent out a record two trillion dollars to individuals in twenty ten.
More than a third of Americans dependent on the so-called social safety net.
And that two trillion dollars is up 75% what it was when Bush took office in um in 2001.
And this article is unusual.
The CNN story is unusual because it distinguishes between those on means-based government assistance and those on Social Security and Medicare, which after all are supposed to be programs that we uh paid into.
So this is entirely above and beyond Social Security and Medicare.
Usually the media does its best to blur the line between the two kinds of government payouts.
But this CNN story is remarkable because they separate them.
And you know the number is still going up, even though the Great Recession officially ended back in June of 2009.
That's what they're telling us.
More than two and a half years ago, folks, the recession ended.
The elections are still nine months away.
The regime wants to get as many people as possible dependent on government before then, and they are doing a bang up job.
Let grab audio sound by 25.
I'm gonna take you back.
This is it was in Fort Myers, it wasn't in Tampa.
It was um February 10th, not even a month after Obama had been immaculated, he goes out and does a town hall in Fort Myers, Florida, a member of the audience, Henrietta Hughes stood up and said this to the BAMster.
I respect you, and I'm so grateful for you.
Thank you.
Been praying for you, but I believe in prayer, so I appreciate that.
I have an urgent need unemployment and homelessness, a very small vehicle for my family and I to live in.
We need urgent and housing authorities have two years Waiting lists, and we need something more than the vehicle and uh parks to go to.
We need our own kitchen and our own bathroom.
Please help.
Well, I uh listen, uh what's your name?
What's your name?
It's Henrietta Hughes.
Okay, Miss Hughes.
Well, we're we're gonna do everything we can to help you, but there are a lot of people like you.
And we're we're gonna do everything we can.
All right, but the uh I'll have my staff talk to you after this uh after the town hall.
I have an urgent need.
I'm unemployed and I don't have a home.
It turns out she did have a home at the time she mentioned this, and later on, a couple of Republicans gave her the use of a vacation home that they had.
This woman was not homeless, she just said she was.
But she needed a new home, she needed a new vehicle.
Uh, she wanted her own new kitchen and her own bathroom.
The president of the United States shows up for a town hall meeting, and a citizen shows up, and that's what she thinks the purpose of it is.
And even if she didn't think it's the purpose, she thought she could run the scam.
Anyway, that's the kind of person, and they run throughout our culture and society.
And the number of people who become dependent, it's not accidental.
This is why, folks.
This is why I maintain and have forever, that the entire welfare system in this country, the social safety net, whatever you want to call it, is destroying people.
It's robbing them of their dignity, it's robbing them of their humanity, it's robbing them of their potential.
There's nothing compassionate about this.
There is nothing compassionate about 20% of this country's population being entirely subsidized by the federal government.
Because the lives that they're living, yeah, it's it's $32,000 and it's tax-free, and that's not bad, but that's as good as they're ever going to do.
They're not being trained, educated, motivated, or inspired to do any better than that.
And what's worse, they end up in their dependent state voting.
The only thing they care about is who the hell's gonna keep this gravy train going.
They don't care about anything else.
Foreign policy, domestic policy, the the circumstances happening to the country because of their dependence.
They don't care about any of that.
When you've got one source, basically to stay alive.
That's all you're gonna care about.
And if that source isn't you, your life's destroyed.
You're over.
You are in prison.
You are forever shackled in this case to a state that doesn't care about you individually, couldn't care less about you except one day every four years, and that's it.
They go out of their way to make you think that they uh have you in their minds each and every day, but this is just the idea that this is compassion and that liberals love people and care for people better than anybody else, and we conservatives who look at this and find it abhorrent.
We are the mean-spirited extremists, the cold-hearted bigots, this is absurd.
An entire segment of our population is being rendered irrelevant.
Their lives are being destroyed, their humanity is being taken away, their dignity done away with.
All for the sake.
Continuation and expansion of power of the Democrat Party in the state.
And I it is it just makes me sick and it infuriates me at the same time.
And we're back.
800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Time magazine.
Last year, a federal program paid out 1.6 billion dollars to cover free cell phones and the monthly bills of 12.5 million wireless accounts.
The program is overseen by the FCC.
It is intended to help low-income Americans.
It is popular for obvious reasons, Time magazine says.
Participation rising steeply since 2008, when the government paid 772 million for phones and monthly bills.
They give you the numbers again here.
2008, federal government paid 772 million dollars for phones and monthly bills since 2008, since Obama.
772 million has uh uh become 1.6 billion.
772 million has become 1.6 more than doubled.
Observers complain that the program suffers from poor oversight, in which phones go to people who don't qualify.
Hundreds of thousands of those who do qualify have more than one phone.
Last summer Pittsburgh Tribune Review Story shed some light on a government program that relatively few Americans knew even existed.
The Lifeline program provides low-income Americans with free cell phones.
They're not smartphones, at least, but that's probably coming.
It covers up to 250 free minutes every month.
As many as five and a half million residents in Pennsylvania alone could qualify for the program, which is funded primarily by the Universal Service Fund fee added to the bills of landline and wireless customers.
So all of us are paying 1.6 billion in our phone bills to cover free phones and accounts for 12 and a half million people.
Well, I guess you can you can probably apply to get you a government phone with your government mortgage payoff.
Yeah.
I think you should uh you should you should go for it.
If you're underwater, don't you don't even have to be underwater.
You can you can apply.
Half of these, some of these people have more than two phones, more than two accounts.
That's the thing.
Obama's stash, what else is in there?
What else are going to be made available to people before November of this year?
What other goodies are people going to be able to have just for asking, or just for being in America, or just for being one of the 99%, or just for being screwed by the rest of the country, just for being screwed by this unfair Constitution and Declaration of Independence?
This is how we're going to make it up to you for all of the rotten treatment you've had since this country was founded.
1.6 billion dollars, free cell phones and the monthly bills, one and a half million wireless accounts.
That's up from 772 million.
20% of Republicans are leaning to voting for Obama, it says here.
This is a story, looks like it's from uh World Net Daily, and the polster is a guy named Fritz Wenzel.
Wenzel Strategies.
Now, by the way, this guy is the official pollster for Ron Paul.
I don't know if that means anything.
I'm just giving you information.
For critics of Barack Obama, 2012 has been portrayed as a do-order die year for the country.
But the 2012 election, it says here, looking more like a replay of 2008.
In every case, this listen to this now.
To show you how it does matter that this pollster works for Ron Paul.
In every case, except the matchup against Ron Paul, more than 20% of Republican voters said they're more likely to support Obama.
You believe this.
This is they're putting this out.
They expect to have credibility attached to this.
We're being told in this story, 20% of Republicans lean to Obama if the nominee is somebody other than Ron Paul.
That's the only time when 20% of Republicans will not vote for Obama is if the nominee is Ron Paul.
I'm just going to say anybody leaning toward voting Obama is not a Republican, periodically.
Period.
Be real helpful to see these polling questions, and how often Ron Paul's name is mentioned in the midst of them.
Rick Warren.
I wonder how Rick Warren, well, we know how Rick Warren's feeling.
Rick Warren did uh what?
Was it the invocation at Obama's Immaculation?
Rick Warren, what's what's uh I forget the name of his church.
What is the name of uh Churchill, what's happening now?
What is the name of his church?
Our Lady of the Miraculous Interstate.
I don't remember the name or I'm not, no, I just don't remember the name of Rick.
What?
Saddleback, right?
Saddleback.
Like, like, like, like uh broke back, yeah, okay.
Saddle s Saddleback Church.
Yeah, I was confusing it with uh Our Lady of the Miraculous Interstate.
Anyway, Rick Warren gave the benediction at Obama's Immaculation.
Rick Warren says, I'm not a Catholic, but I stand in 100% solidarity with my brothers and sisters to practice their belief against government pressure.
I would go to jail rather than cave into a government mandate that violates what God commands us to do.
This blowback against a regime for this mandate in Obamacare, that religious institutions, primary Catholic Church, its schools, provide contraception, morning after pills, dip blowback.
I don't know.
I think maybe the regime didn't figure it be this way.
Maybe the regime is saying, you know what, we've already written off white working class voters.
New York Times a couple months ago.
White working class voters, not even gonna campaign for them.
Give them up.
Maybe now Obama's saying, you know what?
I don't even care about the votes of Catholics.
But Rick Warren says he's gonna go to jail.
I wonder, I wonder how he felt when he heard this.
He did the benediction, but Obama with a great unifier.
How late some people come to the truth.
Do do do do do do do do do do.
Okay.
The free cell phone program is called SafeLink.
I have, I'm gonna show you the ditto cam.
We come back after the break here at the top of the hour.
The way they are advertising this to Americans to sign up for a free cell phone and free 250 minutes a month, and they now do include smartphones in this.
▲
Export Selection