All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 6, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:51
February 6, 2012, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, America's anchorman is away today, and this is your undocumented anchorman sitting in.
As Jeffrey from Columbus, Ohio said, you're not even an American.
What do you know?
That's very true.
Great to be with you from Ice Station EIB in far northern New Hampshire.
By the way, just to pick up one final point on what Jeffrey was talking about in his saying that the Catholic Church should quit whining, should quit taking federal dollars.
Jeffrey kept saying I was playing word games, so he didn't want to listen.
But the point is, this has nothing to do with whether you take federal dollars.
Everybody, everybody has to comply with Commissar Sebelius when it comes to the health care arrangements that you make for your employees.
It's one size fits all from Maine to Hawaii for everybody, regardless of whether I don't take any federal dollars in my line of work, but I'm going to have to comply with this too.
That's just the way it is.
Obamacare is one size fits all healthcare for 310 million people from Maine to Hawaii.
That's why it's going to be a bigger disaster than Canadian government health care or British National Health Service or healthcare in Europe because nobody has ever attempted government health care on this scale before.
And as Commissar Sebelius makes clear, this administration is now going to impose one size fits all for everybody.
Doesn't matter whether you receive federal dollars or all the rest of it.
If you're an employer, this is what you do.
This is what you've got to do.
And that's why this election is critical.
Because if a stake is not driven through the heart of Obamacare early next year, as soon as the new president takes office, this thing will never be killed.
If it's not killed in this next presidential term, it will never be killed.
And we will be stuck with this thing for good.
And government health care fundamentally transforms the relationship between the citizen and the state into something closer to junkie and pusher.
And eventually, or any competing institutions with a different view of things, whether it's the Catholic Church or anybody else, just shrivels away.
And you have this one big government monolith determining everything.
And that's what's at stake in this election.
And that's why the most important thing you can demand from your candidate, whoever it is, whether it's Mitt or Newt or Rick Santorum or anybody else, is that the first thing they're going to do in January 2013 is kill this sucker dead and bury it and salt the earth and ensure it never returns to stalk the land again.
Because if you cross this line, once the goodies start kicking in, once all the healthcare goodies start kicking in in a couple of years' time and people like Jeffrey and Columbus feel they're getting more out of Obamacare than they're paying into it, it's going to just be like every other government entitlement, that you're never going to be rid of it and it's just going to metastasize and eventually swallow the state.
In the province of Ontario, healthcare expenditures, I think in the middle of next decade, are projected to reach over 80% of revenues.
It will be higher here because in certain respects, people are more unhealthy here.
There's higher rates of heart disease and diabetes and all kinds of things.
So if this Obamacare sucker is not killed stone dead in January 2013, and we still have it at the time of the 2016 election, it is over.
It's over big time.
That's what's at stake.
There's all kinds of other news out there.
Rush is going to do the Tuesday morning quarterback thing tomorrow, and he'll get into the whole Super Bowl thing with you there.
I've just been talking about some of the halftime stuff and some of the ads.
And as I said, I found this Clint Eastwood ad deeply depressing because Clint is a movie director.
He's a skilled movie director.
He's made great movies.
And he is an American archetype.
The gritty loaner, the grizzled loaner, the man with no name, Dirty Harry, the iconoclastic Maverick guy.
And he's doing this ad for the most brain-dead collectivism in the Super Bowl last night.
This two-minute ad saying, you know, it's halftime in America.
We've taken some licks, but if we all pull together, it's all going to come roaring back just like Detroit is roaring back.
And Detroit is roaring back.
This was a Chrysler ad.
And as I tried to point out to Jeffrey, not only is it the case that I'm not even an American, but the guys who own Chrysler aren't even Americans.
That's an Italian.
No, no, no, I'm playing the Morning Games again, Mr. Snerdley.
Oh, yes.
Italian.
They're Italian passport holders.
They're citizens of Italy.
And they own the Chrysler Motor Company.
That's just word games.
Because what matters is that somehow Clint striding through this post-industrial apocalyptic wasteland embodies the American spirit.
A listener points out that, in fact, I was wrong to say that nothing could be more American than an Italian automobile company building automobiles in the province of Ontario, because he points out that a lot of them are built in Mexico too.
So I just want to, no disrespect to the Mexicans.
I didn't mean to exclude you from that.
Nothing could be more American than an Italian automobile company building its vehicles in Ontario and Mexico City.
You can't get more Americans, more American than that.
There's something, I must say, you know, again, speaking as a sinister foreigner, there's something delightfully cynical about the way foreign enterprises promote themselves in the United States.
I always like it.
I always have a chuckle when if I ever do Rush's show from New York City and I'm wandering around the corner from the studios in New York and you pass a branch of TD Bank whose slogan is TD Bank, America's Neighborhood Bank.
And of course, TD, for those in the know, stands for Toronto Dominion Bank.
And they're as cutting as the Chrysler Automobile Company.
60% Italian-owned, but what could be more American? says Jeffrey of Columbus, Ohio.
So we'll talk about that.
1-800-282-2882.
Obama says that he's getting better at his job.
He's getting better and better at it every day.
And I suggested that by the time he's been in the role for six decades, he might really be on top of it.
Like Her Majesty the Queen, Princess Elizabeth, became Queen Elizabeth II 60 years ago today.
She was in colonial Kenya when it happened.
I don't want to start any rumors implying that she's, you know, Barack Obama is her love child or whatever, and that's why he was born in that Mombasa hospital and it was all covered up.
I'm not getting into that at all.
Don't want to get into that at all.
Barack Obama, President Obama, when he met the Queen, he gave her an iPod loaded with his speeches.
I think even if you buy the iPod with the extra large gigabyte storage, you can actually only get two Obama speeches on it, on one iPod.
Maybe you can get two Obama speeches and one very short third speech on it.
But I would love to know, as the Queen celebrates 60 years on the throne, where the iPod.
I mean, that's a great gift, isn't it?
Think of how much your loved one would appreciate it.
If you gave to someone as a gift for their birthday, you gave them an iPod with your speeches on it.
Isn't that just the perfect gift?
Wouldn't you like, I mean, with Valentine's Day coming up, people talk about, you know, the candy and the flowers and the romantic candlelit dinner.
But isn't it true that your spouse would really just appreciate an iPod with you talking for hours and hours on end on it?
Isn't that just the perfect gift for someone special in your life?
That's what President Obama gave Her Majesty the Queen.
I would love to know where that iPod is and whether the Queen in Buckingham Palace, like today she's celebrating 60 years on the throne.
She thinks, well, I really, you know, I'm sure they could throw me a big dinner or whatever.
But really, I'd like to just spend a quiet night in listening to that nice Barack Obama's speeches on that iPod he gave me.
That would be the perfect way to celebrate the 60th anniversary of my accession to the throne.
I'd love to know where that iPod with Obama's speeches on it.
Is it like, you know, I don't, I hesitate to raise this question, but you know how it is sometimes when you get a Christmas present you don't particularly want, that someone gives you a Christmas present you don't particularly want, and you wait a couple of months and you've got a birthday coming up for somebody and you think, well, maybe I can shuffle off that lousy Christmas present that I didn't really want on them.
You know, you can, what do they call it here?
Re-gifting.
Is that what they call it?
Re-gifting.
Maybe you could re-gift someone with that present you didn't really want.
And I wonder sometimes if out there there's an obscure member of the royal family, I don't know who, Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Gloucester or the Earl of Ulster, one of these very minor members of the royal family who on his birthday six months ago unwrapped the present from the Queen, from his cousin or his great-grandmother or whatever,
and discovered that she'd re-gifted him with the iPod with Barack Obama's speeches on.
But I would love to know where that is.
But if you if you're Mike has just suggested that if she had a sense of humor, she'd give it to Hugo Chavez.
That's true.
That's true.
I hope she does do that.
I'd like to think she'd maybe give it to Bash of Assad and he'd just fly into an even bigger rage.
Or she'd give it to that guy Tad Tawi in Cairo and he'd put even more Americans on trial.
Anyway, who knows?
I'd love to know where that iPod with the fully loaded with Barack Obama speeches in is because that is the perfect gift.
And if you're thinking, as I said, for Valentine's Day, for your loved one, for your loved one, don't go with the chocolates.
Don't go with the bouquet of roses.
Don't go with, you know, the candlelight dinner, the lights down low, a bottle of wine, you know, Johnny Mathis on the hi-fi.
The chicks don't dig any of that stuff.
What they want is a speech, an iPod fully loaded with Barack Obama speeches.
You are going to have a real hot night.
If you give your loved one that, you're going to need a Nancy Pelosi-sized condom drawer just for all the action you're going to be getting that night after giving your loved one the iPod fully loaded with Barack Obama speeches.
So I would love to know where that is.
If you're a Buckingham Palace footman and you're listening and you've got the inside scoop on where that thoughtful gift, the Barack Obama iPod, is right now, give us a call.
1-800-282-2882.
Mark Stein in for Rush on the EIB network.
Mark Stein and for Rush on the EIB network.
Let's go to Monica in Iron Mountain, Michigan.
Hi, Mark.
I wanted to weigh in on this contraception issue.
My question is, since when is contraception help care?
What disease does contraception protect you from?
I mean, unless you consider pregnancy to be a disease, which I guess some people do, it doesn't protect you from any disease or restore you to health.
On the contrary, it takes a system that is working exactly like it's supposed to work and it puts it in a state of dysfunction.
You know, well, I think we have to ask ourselves, you know, first it's like health care is a right.
Okay.
Now contraception is a right.
I mean, where is this?
You know, what other rights are we going to have to pay for that are really people's lifestyle choices?
Well, Nancy Pelosi would put it this way.
When she was asked why she wanted hundreds of millions of dollars in the stimulus in 2009 to go towards contraception, she said, because freeing up all these people to instead of them getting pregnant and having babies and being at home with the babies, instead, they would be out in the workforce spending money, stimulating the economy.
So for her, it was an economic stimulus issue.
It's the other way around, by the way, when they talk about free diapers for babies in Connecticut, where the governor has launched this, he wants the federal government to pay for free diapers because it would enable more single women.
In that case, it would enable more single women to enter the workforce.
But you're right.
This isn't a free condom is not anything to do with a health care issue.
It's a Saturday night out issue.
And why should the idea that the brokest nation in history should somehow be requiring everybody, employers to provide free condoms for their employees?
In my book, Monica, this is a good example of the way they think about it.
I quote from the Washington Post a fellow who attends the University of the District of Columbia, and he's complaining that the free condoms the University of the District of Columbia gives him are not good enough quality.
Quote, if people get what they don't want, they are just going to trash them, said T. Squalls 30, who attends the University of the District of Columbia.
So why not spend a few extra dollars and get what people want, unquote?
Mr. T. Squalls, aged 30, quoted in The Washington Post, a 30-year-old man expects to receive free condoms.
You're right, that isn't healthcare.
What on earth?
How did we get to a situation where it's expected that men in early middle aged should somehow free condoms should be some kind of human right?
This is insane, Monica.
Everything else, and that's why we're broke.
We're going to have to start prioritizing what things we want to give away and not.
And, you know, I mean, one side always talks about pro-choice, pro-choice.
People have a choice.
If your employer offers a health plan you don't agree with, you don't have to work for them.
You can go work for somebody else.
I really want to make my final point as far as I understand not everybody agrees that contraception is morally wrong, but I don't think really that's the issue.
To me, it's a lot deeper than that.
This is about religious liberty.
And I think anybody who cares about religious liberty and religious freedoms should care about this issue.
Yes, but you know, Monica, that is the issue.
But you're moving, and the debate has moved, not from the question of whether you regard contraception as morally wrong.
That is something that is free for people to do.
But the government now says it doesn't matter what you believe on that.
We have a one-size-fits-all morality.
And that means that you can be, as Nancy Pelosi claims to be, a devout Catholic.
But you have to hang your Catholicism on the hatstand before you leave the front door in the morning.
Religious belief is something you keep to yourself.
You keep it in your house.
When you leave the door and go to your place of employment, the secular religion dominates.
And if the secular religion says that condoms are a human right, then you have to provide it to your employees, and your employees have to avail themselves of it.
And regardless, you can be a devout Catholic behind your front door furtively and secretly when you get back home in the evening.
But in the public sphere, a universal government-imposed morality takes place over that, Monica.
And that's why they're not going to yield ground on this thing.
The only thing about this, Nancy Pelosi, I will say is that I am very offended that she would presume to speak for all Catholics.
But beyond that, I'm not going to comment because I vowed in 2012 I was going to try to be more charitable.
And so I just really don't want to say anything else about that.
Oh, well, oh, Monica, I respect you for saying that.
I respect you for saying that, Modica.
But you know what happened to Newt in Iowa when he tried to stay positive at Upbeat.
Call us back in a couple of weeks.
Work it out.
Work it out.
Work out a negative, devastating, go-negative.
Stomp Nancy Pelosi into the ground, attack on her, and call us back in a couple of weeks when you're on top of it and go negative on her.
Because you know how stag positive worked for Newt in Iowa.
Thanks for your call.
Great to have you with us.
Great to have you with us today, Modica.
Occupy Oakland.
They're still out there, you know, these Occupy guys.
Occupy Oakland protesters have called for a so-called day of action to start today, Monday.
So it may be going on even as we speak.
I think it starts noon Pacific time.
So just when we go off the air in about an hour's time here, Occupy Oakland is going to have a so-called day of action to protest police tactics used during earlier protests.
Day of action will be very novel for some of those guys.
By the way, two people in Oakland were murdered by their foster child, and their bodies were found in the back of the family's PT cruiser.
And it said the coverage of the story in the San Francisco Chronicle said that the parents had argued with their foster child over him spending too much time in the Occupy Oakland encampment.
Yes, great to be with you.
Rush returns tomorrow for full strength, all-American excellence in broadcasting right through the end of the week.
Don't forget, if you go to rushlimbore.com and you're a Rush 24-7 subscriber, it's like he isn't away.
You don't have to be discombobulated by sinister foreign guest hosts.
You can enjoy audio.
You can enjoy program transcripts.
You can enjoy old Rush video.
You can get the new DittoCam.
You can get all kinds of things.
Rushlimbore.com for Rush24-7 subscribers.
Let's go to Mike in Incline Village, Nevada.
Scene of the Iowa caucuses.
Actually, I don't know if not the Iowa caucuses, the Nevada Caucuses.
I don't know whether they had one in Incline Village, Nevada.
Did you caucus on Saturday night, Mike?
Yes, I did.
We had our caucuses on Saturday throughout the state, starting around 9 a.m., and most of them lasted till noon.
And they had a couple others down in Las Vegas later in the day that they had a real problem with and counting votes.
So it was a real mess out here, actually.
All right.
And how did your neighborhood go in the Nevada caucus?
Well, that's actually what I called about.
I saw something in the caucuses, and I kind of saw this from reading some of the other caucuses.
And I also picked it up in your first caller today, Vinny, is that there seems to be this euphoria among some of the voters now that they'd rather they want to get excited.
They want to have a thrill up their leg in November when they go into the voting booth rather than voting on somebody that's got good ideas and a good, clear direction.
I remember in 1980, there wasn't this sense of euphoria related to Reagan.
People took a hard cold look at the fact that the country was in a mess, and there were some people who were kind of on the John Anderson side who I'd put in the I'd put Newt Gingrich in the same class with John Anderson in terms of his loopiness.
And in terms of Romney, we've got somebody who's clearly a moderate at best, yet people are giddy over him.
Yeah, well, I think what you're talking about there, the idea of getting the tingly leg sensation, is that a lot of people are kind of invested in sort of attitude, and they like it when Newt comes out and he beats up John King of CNN.
Well, I mean, big deal.
I mean, who can't beat up John King of CNN?
Kathy Lee Gifford could beat up John King.
Marie Osmond could beat up John King.
Why is that regarded as a spectacular achievement?
I think it's because people like that sort of attitude.
For some reason, they're so frustrated by the last few years and where the United States is headed that a bit of kind of swagger and attitude is important to them, and they find Mitt too kind of even-tempered in that regard, Mike.
We drove down and saw Rick Santorum speak a couple of days before the caucus, and he came across as a very serious, sincere politician with ideas that were worth discussing.
And it was refreshing to hear somebody who came across so directly.
And that was in the caucus, is getting back to your original question.
There were several people there that said, well, I really like what Santorum has to say, but I like the attitude behind Gingrich, and I like the enthusiasm and the possibilities of Romney and how good he's going to look on television and in the debates and so forth.
But the thing they seem to miss is that the debates are, by and large, are controlled by the establishment.
And the media establishment and the political establishment is not going to do anything that's going to put Obama in any kind of a position where he's going to look poorly.
No, no, that's true.
And they're not real debates.
And the idea that he'll be able to clobber Obama the way he walloped John King or Wolf Blitz or any of them, that's going to be all Juan Williams.
That's going to be a very different game.
Thanks for your call, Mike.
Let's go to Dawn, who is somewhere in the great state of Oregon.
I know not where, but it's an undisclosed location.
Dawn, it's great to have you with us on the show.
Hi, Mark.
Welcome to Ameritopia.
That's Mark Levin's great book.
And very pertinent.
Oh, I haven't read it yet.
I've got to get it.
No, I apologize for Jeff.
I really want you to welcome you to America and move here, be a citizen.
Thank you.
Thank you, Dawn.
And I will come and stand if I have my swear against everybody.
I'll try to schedule it in Oregon and you can come and help.
I'll take the oath of office on Obama's autobiography or whatever they're using for the oath of allegiance.
It's such a red county.
Or not red, but blue and regulated.
I wanted to make a comment about this government regulation on the Catholic Church.
Right.
I wonder if there, what regulations do they have on some of the mosques?
Are they supposed to give out condoms and birth control or anything?
Well, it's interesting you mention that because there's been, according to a story I see, I think it's at National Journal, an explosion of anger from American Islam, from America's Islamic leaders.
On Sunday, Imams, this is yesterday, imams in at least 125 mosques had letters of protest read from their, oh no, this was Friday prayers.
They had letters of protest read from their prayer rugs in Texas.
And four Imams in Phoenix, Cincinnati, Green Bay, Wisconsin, and Lubbock, Texas warned of civil disobedience.
We cannot, we will not comply with this unjust law, said Imam Hussain Alabin of Phoenix, according to National Journal.
So already they're sounding tougher on this than the Catholic bishops are.
The Catholic bishops didn't threaten civil disobedience, Dawn.
That's interesting.
I never heard that one yet about their disobedience protesting.
Well, you know the way this thing works, Dawn, is that I mentioned earlier that the big government imposes these one-size-fits-all solutions.
You know these books that they have to promote gay marriage, like Heather Has Two Mommies.
You know those kinds of books?
Correct.
Textbooks, and they put them in schools.
And when uptight Christian fundamentalists complain, the school board says, well, tough, if you object to Heather has two mommies being taught to your kindergartner or your first grader, tough, that's just the way it is.
You guys have got to get with the program.
Just because you're a Christian doesn't mean that you can opt out of this stuff.
We're going to teach it to them anyway.
That's the way they said in Massachusetts.
That's the way they do it all over the country.
And it was interesting that in Bristol, England, when this came up in the local grade school there, in a mostly Muslim part of Bristol, England, Heather has two mommies.
When the Muslims complained, Heather has two mommies.
This was a law passed by the Tony Blair ministry that said you've got to teach the joys of gay marriage to your grade schoolers.
When the Muslims complain, they whist it off the shelves and nothing flat at all.
If it's a contest between Heather has two mommies and Heather has a big-bearded Imam with four child brides and a cousin back in Pakistan that he's planning on marrying her off to, you bet on Heather has four Imams every time.
That beats Heather has two mommies.
And you learn the sort of hierarchy of victim groups, that the Muslims, the Christians tend to get this stuff shoved down their throats whether they want it or not.
The Muslims, for some strange reason, whenever the Muslims raise a complaint about it, people think, ooh, okay, maybe we better pull it from the bookshelves or whatever.
And when they bark, people move, huh?
Yeah, and for fairly obvious reasons of naked muscle.
In other words, when people put on, there was a play in New York a couple of years ago, Corpus Christi by Terence McNally, big Broadway play about a gay Jesus having gay sex with a gay Judas Iscariot.
And there were Catholics standing.
The cast came out the stage door and there were Catholics standing outside the theater with placards protesting.
If they'd done a play about a gay Muhammad, there would have been an entirely more motivated crowd waiting outside the stage door and that's why there aren't any plays about a gay Muhammad.
So the best thing, Dawn, in this whole thing may be that in fact, the saviors of religious liberty in the United States may be these Imams in Lubbock and Phoenix and Cincinnati and Green Bay who are threatening civil disobedience over this new Obaba law.
We'll see how that plays out.
Thank you.
Thank you for your call, Dawn, and thank you for your good wishes to me too.
Thanks a lot, Mark Stein.
In Farash on the EIB network, more to come.
Mark Stein and Farush.
I have no idea what that heavy breathing was in, but maybe it's something to do with this story.
This is, by the way, why we need, why we need more condoms and contraceptives out there.
A woman who was a 19-year-old White House intern in 1963, in other words, this isn't that intern from the 1990s.
This is an intern from 1963, has written a new biography claiming she had an 18-month sexual affair with President John F. Kennedy that began in the White House when she was still a virgin.
Mimi Alford, 69, a retired church administrator, writes that she was invited to swim with the president at the White House pool four days after the internship began and had sex with him that evening.
This was the bit that caught my eye.
She claims that during one pool swim, Kennedy's friend, White House special assistant Dave Powers, sat on the side of the pool and cooled his bare feet in the water.
She writes, the president swam over and whispered in my ear, Mr. Powers looks a little tense, he said.
Would you take care of it?
Mr. Powers looks a little tense.
Would you take care of it?
That's the Kennedy White House.
He should have done that with the Cuban Missile Crisis.
You know, Comrade Khrushchev looks a little tense.
Would you swim over and take care of it, Mimi?
It would have been a whole lot better, maybe, for the way things turned out if he'd done that.
That's why we need all these more government condoms.
I was interested when we were talking about the Islamic objections that have been raised to the Obama mandatory condom dispenser.
I noted that the various Imams have now complained about it, and they're threatening civil disobedience, which the Catholic bishops aren't doing.
At their prayer rugs, from their prayer rugs at Friday prayers, they read out all these letters of protest in at least 125 mosques, and they've warned of civil disobedience.
I don't quite get actually what the objection to most forms of contraception are, because I was just looking at one of these ask the imam type websites, and the Islamic view on birth control and contraception is actually more generous than that of the Catholic Church.
The hadith of Abu Dawud said, O messenger of Allah, I have a slave woman and I engage in Azul with her, which I believe is the Arabic for coitis interruptus.
I engage in Azul with her because I do not want her to get pregnant, but I want what men want.
But the Jews say that Azul is a lesser form of infanticide.
And the Messenger of Allah, Muhammad, replied, The Jews are lying.
If Allah wants to create a child, you cannot prevent that.
So, as far as I understand, there is no specific prohibition on Muslims using the Obamacare, the exciting and lavish range of Obamacare contraceptions.
But the Imams object to it, I think, because they don't want women, as far as I can read in between the lines here, they don't want women signing up for contraceptive services without getting the approval of the big-bearded male in the household.
So, there are some interesting distinctions.
This, by the way, is why Obamacare is going to be the world's greatest disaster.
Because we now have a centralized government legislating the healthcare arrangements of 310 million people.
And sometimes they're Nancy Pelosi, the devout so-called devout Catholic, who says the problem with her fellow devout Catholics is that they're hung up on this conscience thing.
And sometimes, and sometimes they're people like these big-bearded Imams who simply don't want it because they don't want their women folk getting access to all kinds of stuff unless they're signing off on it.
But we're looking at a colossal disaster unknown to man.
And what it really represents, I would say, is the government nationalization of your body.
In other words, Commissar Sibelius thinks she knows better than you what your body ought to have put in it, what your body ought to be putting itself in, and the healthcare arrangements that your body parts ought to be making.
And that is why, if it is not driven into the ground in the first act of an incoming president in January 2013, this thing will never be killed, and it will drag us all down into an abyss way beyond Canadian, British, European healthcare, or any of those other socialized systems.
Nobody's ever done it on this scale before.
Mark Stein Farash at the EIB network, Mordecai.
Mark Stein in Farash of the ERB network.
I meant to get to this just earlier in the day, but it is a fascinating thing.
The portrayal of a young Asian woman in an ad being run by US Senate candidate Pete Huckstra in Lansing, Michigan, has brought charges of racial insensitivity.
He basically has put a Chinese lady like a coolie in a rice paddy somewhere crowing about the way American debt is transferring all kinds of goodies over to the People's Republic of China.
And it would seem to me it's like a fairly obvious parody of stereotypical Chinese people from, I don't know, Flower Drumsong or whatever, or Fu Manchu or all the rest of it.
But he's now being accused of deliberate racism by his fellow Republicans.
And I am so fed up with this stuff.
I mean, the thing is now, the GOP consultant Nick Deloe has flat out scolded the Holland Republican, calling it appalling.
You don't even need the Democrats to cry racist now When Republican consultants and Republican advisors are preemptively shrieking racist at it.
And these are serious times.
We need to get over this kind of stuff.
I didn't think it was the greatest ad in the world.
But the idea that just putting a Chinese woman in an obviously stereotypical thing in a rice field is somehow racist is absolutely ludicrous.
▲
Export Selection