All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 26, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:56
January 26, 2012, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
My gosh, I look like a carrot up there on my DittoCam TV.
Look at that skin tone.
Look like I got beta carotene and rubbed it all over my face.
I wonder, you know, Barney Frank, the big news today, Barney Frank's 71 years old, going to marry his partner.
I wonder if Barney's going to have an open marriage.
Hi.
How are you?
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies Talent on Loan from God.
The telephone number is 800-282-2882.
The email address, lrushbo at eibnet.com.
Obama looked like a carrot at the State of the Union.
I have to tell you, DirecTV sent down a system update sometime during the day on Tuesday because when I fired up the TV, when I got home and I fired up the TV, they had a whole new graphical interface.
It's a huge improvement, but the picture was a little different.
And I said, I wonder if they're monkeying here with their signal and changing it a little bit because Obama looked orange.
Like he'd rub beta carotene all over him.
Like I look up there on my DittoCam TV.
We are going to get to your phone calls in this hour.
Fairly or unfairly, here's what I think is going on.
I think in Florida here, throughout the Republican presidential primary, at least when discussing Gingrich and Romney, I really think people see Gingrich fighting for an ideal and they see Romney fighting to get elected.
I think if I had to synthesize what the campaign breaks down to, it's that.
Newt stands for an ideal, whether it's colonizing the moon or having an open marriage or not having an open marriage or doing depositions when you don't do depositions or whatever.
At least they see him fighting for an ideal.
They see Romney fighting to get elected.
You know that's right.
I mean, you know I've never, Bob Dole has gone nuclear.
Bob Dole said, hey, hey, don't leave me out of this.
Dole, National Review Online on the corner blog, I have not been critical of Newt Gingrich, but it's now time to take a stand before it's too late.
If Gingrich is the nominee, it'll have an adverse impact on Republican candidates running for county, state, federal offices.
Hardly anybody who served with Newt in Congress has endorsed him, and that fact speaks for itself.
He was a one-man band who rarely took advice.
It was his way or the highway.
Gingrich served as Speaker from 95 to 99.
He had trouble within his own party.
Already in 97, a number of House members wanted to throw him out, but he hung on until after the 98 elections when the writing was on the wall.
His mounting ethics problems caused him to resign in early 1999, and I know whereof I speak, as I helped establish a line of credit of $150,000 to help Newt pay off the fine for his ethics violations.
In the end, he paid the fine with money from other sources.
Gingrich had a new idea every minute, and most of them were off the wall.
He loved picking a fight with Bill Clinton because he knew this would get the attention of the media.
This and a myriad of other specifics helped to topple Gingrich in 98.
In my run for the presidency in 96, Dole writes here, Democrats greeted me with a number of negative TV ads, and in every one of them, Newt was in the ad.
He was very unpopular, and I'm not only certain that this did not help me, but that it also cost House seats that year.
Newt would show up at the campaign headquarters with an empty ice bucket in his hand.
That was a symbol of some sort for him, and I never did know what he was doing or why he was doing it.
Imagine that picture.
Newt Gingrich showing up at headquarters with an empty ice bucket.
Of all the things that Bob Dole remembers to include in this piece.
In my opinion, writes Mr. Dole, if we want to avoid an Obama landslide in November, Republicans ought to nominate Romney.
He has the requisite experience in the public and private sectors.
He'd be a president we could have confidence in.
So it is both barrels.
Back to the audio sound bites.
Nancy Reagan in Phoenix, a Goldwater Institute dinner in 1995.
Number 26, 27 and 28.
The dramatic movement of 1995 is an outgrowth of a much earlier crusade that goes back half a century.
Barry Goldwater handed the torch to Ronnie, and in turn, Ronnie turned that torch over to Newt and the Republican members of Congress to keep that dream alive.
Ronnie turned a torch over to Newt and the Republican members of Congress.
Nancy Reagan.
Now, if she thought, she obviously didn't know that Newt had been out there saying the era of Reagan was over in 1988.
If she'd have known that, she wouldn't have said this.
Here's Newt, Monday night in Tampa.
He's live on NBC.
This is during the debate.
And Brian Williams said, Mr. Speaker, you've been talking a lot about conservative principles in this campaign so far.
Is that enough for you?
Is that good enough to get you through here?
Look, I don't want to spend my time commenting on that.
I'd like to just tell you that I started, I went to a Goldwater organizing session in 1964.
I met with Ronald Reagan for the first time in 1974.
I worked with Jack Kemp and Art Lauffer and others to develop supply-side economics in the late 70s.
Okay, that's from the debate Monday night.
Let's go back to April 11th, 1988, a Washington news program.
Newt Gingrich.
I think this party, in that sense, is a very different party than it was, say, from the fights of the years of the Rockefeller-Goldwater process, a period in which, by the way, I was a Rockefeller State Chairman of the South.
Snirdley can't believe it.
Snirdley's mouth, his chin is on the desktop.
I tell you, I went to a Goldwater organizing session in 1964.
I met with Reagan for the first time.
Both of these could be true.
He could have gone to a Goldwater organizing session in 64, didn't like it, and joined the Rockefeller campaign.
But it does sound like back in 1988, I'll say this, whatever.
Well, you got a debate tonight.
Get a debate tonight.
It's obvious they're clearing the field for Romney.
Back in 1988, Newt's making it plain he was a Rockefeller Republican.
And by the way, in 1988, that was your ticket to the establishment.
Remember, folks, the Republican establishment never liked Reagan.
I know I say this over and over again.
He didn't like Reagan.
He was Rockefeller's state chair in 1968 in the South.
1968, he was a Rockefeller state chairman, 68.
Talks about going to a Goldwater meeting in 64.
So Monday night, big Goldwater guy.
Remember now, 1988, the establishment was happy.
They couldn't wait to get rid of it.
In fact, Jeff Lord at American Spectator has written about some of the things that happened when the Bush 41 people showed up and took over the West Wing.
They got rid of all the Reagan stuff.
It was, I forget the specifics, but in 1988, your ticket to the top of the GOP was to sign up for being a moderate.
So at least at best, you can say maybe Newt was practicing opportunism here.
So that's that.
That's the Newt stuff.
Yeah, it was kinder gentler.
Bush 41, kinder, gentler.
Thousand points of light.
I was number 732.
If you remember, I was number 732 of the thousand points of light.
I even printed a certificate.
I figured out how to use PageMaker.
So I printed my own certificate.
I was number 732 at 1,000 points of light.
Okay, yesterday's move on to Obama and Jan Brewer.
Obama lands in Arizona, and perfunctorily, the governor shows up on the tarmac to greet Obama, and they went at it.
And she pointing her finger at him.
He walks away from her.
They had a heated discussion.
And every said, what happened here?
What is this all about?
And apparently, she has let Obama have it in a book.
Don't forget he is suing her and her state over their attempts to enforce essentially federal immigration laws.
There is no love lost whatsoever.
And yet Obama gets off.
He doesn't bow to her.
He gets off and he starts giving her the business.
He starts trash talking to her and she doesn't take it.
She starts pointing her finger back.
I'll tell you what I think's going on.
I'll repeat something to you that I've said previously because I think this is a great illustration of how Obama sees himself, who he is, how he operates.
My theory, which I have shared on many previous occasions, is this man has had the road paved for him.
He has never been challenged by anyone anywhere.
If he needed an A, Professor found a way to get him an A when he deserved a C.
I mean, I don't know that.
I just, I just, that specific example, I am totally confident that he has had, in terms of being challenged and opposed, he's had a charmed life.
The 2008 campaign was a charmed campaign.
I mean, there was no vetting.
There was no challenge whatsoever in the media.
You know, some perfunctory stuff like that David Aaron Wright piece in the LA Times and Barack the Magic Negro, but that was perfunctory as well.
He wasn't authentically black because he wasn't down for the struggle with that slave blood.
They had to say that stuff just to protect their own street cred.
But he's had a charmed life.
Nobody challenges this guy.
And she has.
And that just isn't done.
You don't challenge me.
Who the hell do you think you are?
You know who I am.
I am this country.
I'm the one who made Warren Buffett Secretary a real human being.
Who are you?
You're human to be.
He's this clean, articulate guy.
People like Bite Me thought, wow, this is really cool.
He's had his knee breakers quietly mow down anybody who opposed him at any election.
So when a U.S. governor offers up an example of his childlike behavior, he gets in her face.
And he was all in Bobby Jindal's face.
He was in Bobby Jindal's face over something that happened in Louisiana after the BP oil spill.
He said to Jindal, nothing's good is going to come of what you did here.
Nothing good's going to come of this.
Remember, he is suing Arizona.
He's suing Brewer State over the United States president is suing a state over a law the state voted on.
So she's at that airplane to welcome him to the state.
He's suing out of respect for the office.
He gets off the plane, insults her over a passage in a book she wrote.
You talk about holding a grudge, I'm saying these guys got countless grudges, countless chips on the soldier, shoulder.
I don't think he can take it.
This is why I have longed for somebody in eyesight.
Just treat the guy as your normal average political opponent and go for it.
This guy is so thin-skinned, you can see through him.
And he shows it, and that's his thin-skinnedness is what was on display in the tarmac or on the tarmac out in Arizona.
Same thing to Bobby Jindal.
Now, I got to take a brief time out.
We'll come back.
And we'll a mix of your phone calls and sound bites here.
Other stuff happening in the news as well.
So sit tight.
You can really say we've just barely scratched the surface here.
We're back, Rush Lembaugh.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Your guiding light through times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos, despair.
And yes, even the good times.
Here is Jed in Boise, Idaho.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
How are you doing today, Rush?
Just fine, sir.
Thank you.
El Mucho.
What I called about is I hear you and a lot of the other conservative talk radio hosts supporting Mitt Romney.
Yet we all know that he's a socialist and nobody ever pushes him.
I'm getting worn out.
We'll talk record, not rhetoric.
I'm getting worn out.
I got Romney calling me, wanting to come see me, trying to get me to stop being so hard on him.
You think I'm sitting here supporting Romney?
I spent most of a full show last week analyzing what Newt did in a positive way as to why he was getting the applause.
You're reading from some script here.
You're talking to the wrong host.
I'm not choosing anybody.
I have heard you yourself say that if Romney wins a nomination, that you're going to vote for him.
Okay?
Yeah.
That is supporting, that lends a credibility to a Republican socialist.
I'm going to vote for any Republican over Obama.
So is everybody else.
What makes a Republican socialist any better than a Democrat socialist who have an office now?
I don't think Romney is a socialist.
Well, we'll talk his record and I'll prove it to you.
Okay.
Rockard.
Mitt Romney is governor of Massachusetts, the only governor in the history of this country, 230 years, okay, to have ever passed socialized medicine on to the citizens of this, in any capacity up until Barack Obama.
Okay, Romney's a socialist.
Barack Obama followed his lead and did the same thing.
Who are you for?
Romney's a socialist.
Who are you for?
I'm for any one of the other three.
But if I'm voting in the primary, I'm going to vote for Gingrich.
Okay.
But if any one of the other three win, I'll vote for them because they're at least conservatives.
Now, a question, does any of this stuff about none?
No wrong answer here.
I'm just collecting information.
Is there any stuff about Newt that's out there now?
Does it bother you?
No, because I'm intellectually honest with myself and I listen to what Newt says and I don't try to put words into his mouth that he didn't say.
In 1988, he did not say that Reagan was wrong and that what Reagan did was wrong.
What he said was that George Bush needed to look forward in the future and that going back and rehashing things that Reagan had already taken care of was not going to win him in the White House.
That's the way I interpret it.
He said not that he's coming out saying, oh, Reagan was bad and that we need to turn against what Reagan did to the last.
He did say that.
He said Reagan was failing in his efforts against the Soviet Union.
He said Reagan was failing in his efforts to stop Soviet expansionism.
He said Reagan was failing in his efforts to dealing with Iran-Contra.
We've got it.
We've played it.
Newt supports a health care mandate.
He has for 20 years.
He supports the federal government making you buy insurance.
Now he's backed off of that.
He's going to start throwing a socialism turn.
I'll tell you, these are times of tumult.
There's no question about it.
Really?
All right, Jed, thanks for the call.
Seriously, mean it.
Mike in Fremont, Ohio.
Great to have you, sir.
You're next.
Hello.
Yeah, specadles, Eric Rush.
Thank you there very much, sir.
Okay, I was wondering about what's going to happen if Newt is the nomination and he does get to be president because I think he can beat Obama.
All these guys trashing him, all these leading Republicans, how are they going to work with him?
How's he going to?
I don't know because I think they really hate him.
Yeah, they do.
I can tell that too.
They hate this guy, and I don't think they want him to win.
If he gets a nomination, I don't think they want him to be president.
Well, they don't.
I think he can really take it to Obama, and that's the problem.
And these other guys are just going to suck up.
So, well, you know, the way politics is at the end of it, they'll find a way.
It always happens.
This is not the first international battle of this kind.
This is not the first campaign where people have asked the question that you're asking here.
Oh, my God.
How are these guys going to put it back together and love each other?
I just take you back to 2008.
They hated Romney.
The McCain people hated Romney.
Huckabee hated Romney.
Now they're endorsing him.
It's politics.
Let me tell you why.
The money.
If they win, they control the money.
That's power.
They will find a way to love each other.
Never fear.
Republicans want to be in charge of the money.
You know, the sad, sad thing is that we really don't have a free market.
We have the illusion of one.
You know, one of the real true facts of life in America is today is that big corporations don't want a free market.
They want intimate relationships with powerful politicians.
They want intimate relationships with the powerful politicians who regulate the market.
They want to be on the winning side when politicians start regulating the market.
I give you his example, and there are countless examples.
I'll give you Jeffrey Imelt at General Electric.
These CEOs all know that no matter which party is in charge, they're going to be regulating business.
It's not a roll of the dice.
It's standard operating business procedure.
If the government has the power to regulate your business, you get in bed with them to limit the damage and maybe on the upside get regulations in your favor.
Sadly, folks, the truth, that's the way it happens.
I really meant it earlier.
I hope at the end of all this, whoever is coordinating this on Newt has the guts and the gumption to go after Obama this way.
But I have my doubts because I've heard the stories about the RNC interviewing various polling groups seeking advice on how best to go after Obama.
Oh, don't be critical, they're telling.
Oh, no, no.
Don't be critical.
Obama's lovely, personally popular.
Don't call him a song.
Don't call him.
Oh, no, no, no, no, no.
We're going to oppose Obama and his policies.
Fine.
So we'll treat Obama with kid gloves.
We will destroy ourselves.
We'll each eat each other alive.
I just hope that there is some of this in reserve for Obama.
Maybe part of this game plan is to get Newt to self-deport like out of the room.
Remember that came up in the debate the other night?
Who was it?
Romney.
Well, we're going to do self-deportation as a way to immigration control.
Economy here is not that hot.
People are leaving.
There are no opportunities here for the illegals.
They're self-deporting themselves.
They're hoping Newt self-deports himself out of the campaign.
It ain't going to happen.
But there is a debate tonight, and this is a massive coordinated attack.
I don't know if it's a conspiracy, but it's coordinated.
All of this stuff has hit in one day.
In the meantime, while all this is going on, home sales in December were the worst on record.
Meanwhile, in the State of the Union show, what I have appropriately dubbed the class warfare rally, Obama's painting this picture of a rebounding economy.
And Aaron Burnett on CNN last night said, you know what?
All excited.
If the unemployment rate gets down to 8.2%, that's it.
The Republicans don't have a prepare.
Obama gets re-elected.
All that sooner is get to 8.2%.
Fewer Americans bought new homes in December, making 2011 the worst sales year ever.
The Commerce Department says new home sales fell last month to a seasonally adjusted annual pace of 307,000.
The pace is less than half the 700,000 economists say must be sold in a healthy economy.
Total home sales last year were less than the 323,000 sold in 2010.
This is the worst year, 2011.
Worst year for home sales since records started being kept back in 1963.
The decline in sales comes as other signs suggest the depressed housing market's starting to recover.
You've got the worst year ever and the AP never giving up.
Hey, guess what?
You know what?
This is coming amid signs that the housing market's starting to recover.
How in the world do you get from the worst year on record to, hey, this is a sign it's starting.
What is it?
So bad it can't get any worse.
Unemployment is up.
Housing is through the floor.
The GDP is what?
The national debt is what?
And the media is telling us Obama's got his swagger back because the economy is doing so well.
Did you hear that Newt wants to colonize the moon, by the way?
Jobless claims are up by 21,000.
But happy days are here again.
That's right.
From Christopher Ruegeber, AP, always dependable.
Number of people seeking unemployment benefits rose last week to a seasonally adjusted 377,000.
That's up from a nearly four-year low the previous week.
But the longer-term trend is pointing to a healthier job market.
Why, Shazam, it's just like in the housing market.
We had a record low year, and it's a sign everything coming back.
And then we had claims for unemployment go way up, but the longer-term trend pointing to a healthier job.
Wow, it couldn't get any better.
Man, all the signs are there.
All the signs.
TARP and the stimulus.
Yeah, it took longer than we thought, but boy, oh boy, are they starting to really work now?
AP says here, the great news is the nation's added at least 100,000 jobs for six straight months.
The unemployment rate has declined to 8.5%, lowest in almost three years.
But what's so wonderful about $100,000 jobs a month?
We have been told we need 150,000 jobs every month just to keep up with population growth.
All bogus.
And then there's this old buddy Jim Pethakucas, who he writes at Reuters.
He's a think tank thinker at the American Enterprise Institute.
And he had a, I guess he was on CNBC with Larry Kudlow.
And the subject of mortgages came up.
This is kind of if I didn't know better, I'd say that in the interview with Kudlow, Romney came out for mass refinancing of U.S. mortgages, just like we heard the regime was thinking of doing.
And by the way, in fact, it may be HARP 2 may, in fact, be happening under our nose while nobody is admitting it.
In fact, it is, because I had somebody give me their HARP 2 postcard.
I have so much stuff on the desk.
I look like an absent-minded professor.
HARP 2 is here.
Do you have a PNC mortgage?
If you do, call us for a loan today.
Now, HARP 2 is what Obama claims has decided yet not to do.
And this is refinancing of your mortgage.
Basically, not forgive it, but really almost wipe it out.
HARP 2 is here.
Yeah, even investment properties, not just homes, refinance investment property.
No minimum credit score required.
Loan has to be owned by Fannie Mayor Freddie Mac.
Bad credit, okay.
Mortgage history, one times 30 in the last seven, 12 months.
Call us for details.
No income documentation needed.
There it is.
It's right there.
And apparently last night, Romney chose to criticize Obama's version of a mass refinance plan, not say he disagreed with it.
The question is, is Romney soft command and control kind of guy?
James Pethakucas, appearing with Kudlow last night, thinks there may be some evidence in this.
He's not talking about Romney care.
Talking about refinancing mortgages.
And apparently, Romney said enough here to indicate that he might be for the mass refinancing of U.S. mortgages.
In a different way than Obama wants to do.
But he might be for it.
For the audio soundbites we go here, ladies and gentlemen, this is CBS this morning, this morning.
They had a guest on their Think Food Group chef and owner, Jose Andres, Think Food Group.
And they had a discussion about Muchelo Obama's mission against childhood obesity.
And Charlie Rose said, Sarah Pale and Rush Limbaugh make the political point that parents ought to be in charge of child nutrition.
Who the hell are you?
These are good objectives, non-obese children, nutritious children, nutritious meal, but it's not the government's role.
It's the parents' role.
That's what Limbaugh thinks.
What did he say you?
This is the big Republican lie.
The Republican lie will tell you government should not be in charge of feeding America.
People of America, the government is doing it right now.
It's something called subsidies.
And the big agribusiness receive huge amount of subsidies.
We need more than one angle to fight the obesity pandemic.
Parents are very important, but we need to train those parents because that you are a parent doesn't mean that you come with the title, I know how to feed my children.
That's Jose Andres, think food group chef and owner, who says we have an obesity pandemic.
And we need to train the parents.
We are the Republican lie.
Government should not be in charge of feeding America.
People of America, the government is doing that right now.
Subsidies.
Yes, we're all eating ethanol.
What do you put on your ethanol, Sterdley?
Tofu?
Anyway, there you have it right there.
So this food group owner, no way.
The parents don't know how to do it.
They need to be trained by government.
The government needs to train the parents to avoid the obesity of children.
Yeah, I know what you're all thinking, and I'm not going to say it.
I know what you're all thinking.
And let's move on to Buffett's secretary.
You know, I made a call yesterday.
Let's see her tax returns.
Now, a bunch of people, Guy Forbes, based on her tax rate of 35 plus percent, a lot of people have been trying to figure out, well, what does she earn?
Let me ask you a question.
When you heard this whole story, Warren Buffett's secretary pays a higher tax rate than he does.
What do you think when you hear a secretary income?
What do you think?
$35,000, $60,000.
What do you think?
Is there something in there?
When you hear that rich old guy, Warren Buffett is paying lower taxes than poor, bedraggled, victimized secretary.
You think here he is a super multi-billionaire and somebody making $35,000 or $50,000 a year, pay $35,000 in Howland Fair, right?
She's making, according to the best estimates, between $200,000 and $500,000 a year.
There's no way you can get to a 35% tax rate, folks, unless you're an absolute idiot at doing your taxes, have a fraudulent fraud accountant, or are genuinely stupid.
The 35% is a top rate, and you can't get there At $60,000 a year income, you just can't do it.
So they've been trying to go, okay, how much of it, how much capital gains income does she have?
We have found out she has two homes.
She's got a home in Nebraska, in Bellevue.
She just bought a place in Arizona, a winter place.
And she's up there sitting next to Muchell Obama, the State of the Union, the class warfare rally, as though she's a big victim.
And that was such a contemptible thing to do because that traditionally is where you put heroes.
And Buffett, Buffett's still out there.
I think that's outrageous.
I think that's outrageous.
I'm paying a lower tax rate.
Well, then fix it for crying out.
Pay her more for crying out loud.
Warren Buffett portraying himself as a victim and as powerless?
That's ridiculous.
I got a tax rate of 15%.
My secretary, 35%.
People need to pay more taxes.
Really?
That's the solution.
You have a contained situation.
You've got Warren Buffett paying 15%.
Actually, 50%, because there's a 35% corporate tax rate on top of that that happens first before the capital gains rate.
But anyway.
So you have this dynamic doing.
You got Warren Buffett and his secretary.
And whatever the dynamic there is, the end result is what?
Everybody needs to be paying higher taxes.
Somebody tell me how that works.
Well, the secretary, 35.6% tax rates and I'm effective tax rate of 17%.
This is terrible unfair.
This is not right.
As though he's sitting around a total victim, can't do anything about this.
Here's what she says.
They asked her on Good Morning America what it was like the past 24 hours.
It's been magical.
I'm still taking it all in.
I can't believe it happened.
It was like a dream come true.
Really?
I wouldn't think if I've been singled out as somebody victimized by America, my boss is a creep, and I'm getting screwed this way, and they bring me up the house, and I sit there.
It's an honor.
And here's, let's see, Buffett.
I guess he's on the same show.
He was asked, Mr. Buffett, do you think this will be a defining issue this year's election?
I think it should be a defining issue.
Debbie works just as hard as I do, and she pays at twice the rate I pay.
I think that's outrageous.
This is such a phony piece of crap.
You know, this Warren Buffett son bud I just played, this is such phoniness, and it's so misleading.
He says, I think it should be a defining issue.
Absolutely.
Debbie works just as hard as I do.
She pays twice the rate I pay because outrageous.
Who knew Warren Buffett was running a sweatshop?
His secretary works as hard as he does.
And she doesn't make one tenth of 1%.
Look at the gap between a CEO and the worker in Warren Buffett's shop.
I thought this only happened at big oil and big retail and big drug, but now we find it's happening at Big Berkshire.
Warren Buffett, $50 billion, his secretary taxed at 35%, a pauper.
And Warren Buffett thinks it's outrageous.
He's running a sweatshop and somehow the government gets the blame here.
Poor old Rick Lazier, remember him?
He's in a debate with Hillary Clinton.
Had some paper in his hand, decided to leave his podium.
He walks over here, signed his pledge on campaign finance reform.
We were running a negative ads.
You would have thought he was going to rape her, and nobody thought that.
You would have thought that he was out there to maul her to attack her.
guy was taken out his political career was over Obama gets off air force.
One charges up to Jan Brewer, female governor, Arizona gets in her face.
Who the hell do you think you are?
Do you know who I am?
The hell with you.
What are you saying about me?
She points a finger back at him.
She says that he's.
He didn't even get to finish what she was saying because he walks off and she's the bad guy.
My how our culture has changed.
Warren Buffett gets to totally take advantage of his secretary.
He could have paid her a little extra, but no, he gets Obama to have her sit up there in the gallery.
What's that worth a dime?
sweatshop berkshire hathaway
well that's how you can interpret this warren buffett the ceo berkshire hathaway is willingly participating in a story of how his secretary is being mistreated by the government actually by the republicans because they are really raping the middle class with these high tax rates and they're giving warrant buffett a pass
Uh, that's true I, I just.
It's amazing the cultural shifts that have taken place.
Imagine Lazio watching this thing, Rick Lazio watching this thing with Obama and Jan Brewer.
You know where is he now running for dog catcher or something lobbyist all because he left the pony with a piece of paper here.
Mrs Clinton, would you care to you get out of my feet you.
What are you gonna?
You're gonna attack me.
We're gonna take.
And he was portrayed as an aggressive, typical male predator, harmless little, innocent Hillary.
She's the woman got the testicle lockbox and he's the one having to get in.
all agree for being a predator folks try to maintain control I know there's a lot of material, there's so much stuff happening that anybody thinks they can host a show during periods of time like this.
But as I've always said, the great make it look easy.
Don't try this at home.
We'll be back.
▲
Export Selection