All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 9, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:58
January 9, 2012, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Yes, I know, ladies and gentlemen.
I called it.
I was four for four.
Wildcard Weekend National Football League, four for four.
But everybody, the whole country, I kid you not, the whole country's talking about my pick Steelers Broncos.
I knew it.
I got the tape here to prove it.
I said it.
I knew it.
I intuited this.
I'm probably the only Steelers fan that was not upset yesterday because I knew it was going to happen.
Anyway, how are you, folks?
Hope you had a great weekend.
Rush Limbaugh here, the EIB Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, as always.
A lot to do today, and looking forward to it.
We had a couple debates over the weekend, Saturday night, ABC hosted it.
But what a joke.
What an absolute atrocity this was.
Here we have the United States economy, U.S. debt is now equal to our GDP and rising.
It isn't going to be long before the entire, the totality of U.S. debt is larger than the entire economic output of this country.
Unsustainable.
And yet, what kind of questions that we got?
Contraception questions.
We had Stephanopoulos who wouldn't let go of it.
And it was the social issue stuff.
It was pure and simple.
And these are not, these are not innocent debate moderators.
These are Democrat Party hacks, every one of them, moderating one of these debates.
It was the same thing on Sunday morning with uh with David Gregory, ABC or NBC's uh Democrat political hack with uh with with more of the same.
It was just it was uh here we have the country economically in great peril.
And the subject matter of the debate on Saturday night largely was these social issues, and of course, there's a strategic reason for that.
Uh that's the Democrats and the media trying to portray all of these Republicans as wacko extremists who want to be in your bedroom every night telling you what you can and cannot do in the meantime, Mitt Romney.
I just Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney says that he will be able to work with Democrats as presidents come two days, maybe three days after McCain endorses Romney.
Romney goes out and says in the Sunday debate, pointing to his time as governor of Massachusetts as proof that he will be able to compromise with people on the in the other party.
Where the 2010 midterm elections about compromising with the other party.
Where does this come from?
Who in the world is out talking about compromising with the other party?
I don't in fact, I don't even hear Democrat critics bringing this up.
This comes out of the blue.
Now there may be a reason for it.
Because I'm holding here uh uh ladies and gentlemen, my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
Gallup poll it's out today.
I don't believe it.
This is what it says.
Record high, 40% of Americans identify as independents in 2011.
But that's not the best of it.
Forty percent of Americans identify as independents, and then more Americans, according to Gallup, identify themselves as Democrats than Republicans.
31% identify themselves as Democrats, 27% as Republicans.
So what we're looking at here, if we're to believe Gallup, 40% of the electorates independent, 31% Democrat, 27% Republican.
Does anybody believe after the 2010 midterm elections that only 27% of Americans identify themselves as Republicans?
Now I will tell you, my guess is that the Republican establishment sees this and believes it.
And when they see Gallup, you brilliant.
I mean, you couldn't have timed this better.
You put out this notion that 40% of the American people claim to be independents.
You, I mean, it's a stampede now on the part of the Republicans trying to get in front of this with Romney suggesting that, yo, yeah, yeah, yeah, I'll be able to work with the Democrats.
I don't know where this comes from.
Uh and I'm hoping that Romney will flip flop on this at some point.
But how will we know?
How will we know?
I mean, this is right out of the McCain campaign.
I'm the guy, yes, right.
I'm the guy that can crush the oil.
I've been crushing the oil my whole life.
I'm the guy that can do it.
I'm the guy that can make the other side tolerate our wackos and our extremists.
So there we go.
Then well, I I I didn't know that God was going to watch the Steelers Broncos.
I said if God decides to watch, who do you think he's going to choose?
You think he's going to want to win?
Tebow or Rottlesberger.
Here, let's go back to the this is what I said.
I yeah, I didn't mention the Cincinnati Houston game in my prognostications because A, I didn't care.
Uh and B, I did I didn't think Cincinnati really had a had a chance, but I didn't mention it.
So I can't claim credit for calling it.
But I did the other three games.
You're asking me about Steelers game.
It's the it's the late game on Sunday.
I'm just telling you.
Of the four games this weekend.
This is the upset special.
This is the one game I can see the underdog winning.
I don't see the Lions beating the Saints.
Um I don't I don't see the uh Falcons being the Giants.
Oh, I yeah, I can see it.
But there's something about this.
The Steelers are not scoring any points.
They're just bugs me.
I uh and they're on the road.
I I on paper, this ought to be Waterloo for the Broncos because the Steelers' defense, but I've got one of these bugaboo feelings about this.
I don't know.
I just I'm not confident.
Now I have to tell you something, and I was shocked when I learned that the Steelers had the number one defense in the league, and I was doubly shocked to learn that the Steelers had the number one pass defense in the league.
And then I was triple shocked to learn that the Steelers had not given up a 100-yard game receivering uh receiver uh receiving yardage, 100 yards per game all season.
I can't because my impression of Steelers is you can throw them on all day long.
Uh obviously I was wrong.
They were but but but see, I'm not wrong because they're that that stat doesn't they they played such pathetic opponents this year, that such a weak schedule.
Um Steelers' defense, the secondary, had been torchable for I don't know how long.
Now it's clear what happened.
It's it's doubly clear what happened.
The Steelers dared Tebow to beat him, throw the ball, and he went out and did just that.
They had nine men in the box.
They were they were protecting on the corners for the option run, and they were going man coverage everywhere else.
Uh, and that's all she wrote.
Now the injuries uh the Steelers coach Tomlinson says, we don't go there.
We don't use injuries as an excuse.
And I understand saying that.
But the Steelers were beat up.
And it's another reason why I I thought that they were they were vulnerable here, particularly on the defensive front.
But I have to, I was I was not surprised by this.
I was surprised the Steelers came back and tied it in the second.
I really was.
So, and I had a friend from New York send me a note on Friday after during the program, and he said, Look, here are the here are the point spreads of the four games.
He he relies on my advice.
Is there anything you see here as their gift here?
And I said, Yeah, take the ten and a half points you're getting of the Broncos and run.
He wrote, really?
That's the one I want to say it worth.
No, that's the one you take.
Take the ten and a half points and forget it.
You know, bet the farm on it.
So I get a note from him last night thanking me.
Because he did it.
Uh what other quote.
I just said that.
I said, if if God is watching the game, who do you think he's gonna prefer?
Oh, why don't have that soundbite?
Uh I don't have that soundbite here.
I just have the soundbite predicting the uh the outcome.
Well, you know, I was I was I was watching the game and and the way it started off.
I just gonna say none of it surprised me.
I don't mean to be a downer here.
And I'm not, I'm not one of these fans that never thinks my team's going to win.
I'm not one of those kind of people.
There's just something about this game from the minute it ended up being a reality.
They're just ripe.
I just make Tebow.
I mean, I was they had a couple safety blitzes, but they didn't even try to rattle.
They're known as Blitzberg.
There weren't any blitzes to speak of.
They just literally said, okay, we're going to go man coverage and make you throw it.
And you've got a couple Steelers cornerbacks today saying, we never saw that on tape.
We have never seen nobody, there is no videotape of Tebow completing passes like that.
Well, maybe it's because they hadn't let him try yet.
Maybe because his own team hasn't believed in him.
Well, you're going to go man coverage all day.
Well, you know, that's Snergley just said that Elway was pretty happy.
That's another thing.
Yeah, it looked like it.
Yeah.
I don't want to look it.
I'm going to reserve all that until this season.
This this.
I guarantee in fact, you know, I have a theory about how news becomes news.
If you have you ever noticed ladies, and this is a sort of stick with me here, a little roundabout way of getting where I want to go.
I have mentioned to you that there is no news anymore.
You turn on the news, it's not what you're watching.
You're not turning on the news to find, okay, what happened today that I don't know about.
That's not what it is anymore.
Particularly now, uh at this time of year and at this time of uh the political cycle.
The news today is all agenda-oriented, it's all propaganda oriented toward re-electing Obama.
Pure and simple, except for most of Fox.
But even on Fox, there are those who have that as their agenda.
More and more, and I noticed this when the website Media Matters kicked up.
When that when that website first went online, I read what the it put together a long list of charges, allegations against me with examples of some of the most outrageous stuff I'd ever seen or said.
And I read it and I said, thank you.
These people are publicizing some of the most beautiful, wonderful, funny, right on the money stuff I've ever said.
I said, This is fabulous.
It's like I've hired my own PR firm.
But then what started to happen was the mainstream media started picking this stuff up as though it had actually happened, as though they were actually listening.
They weren't.
Mainstream media started citing media matters and other sites like that in a way as to make their readers and viewers think that they themselves, the reporters had heard me say this stuff, which they hadn't.
So a light went off in my head.
This is the new way that news is made.
This is the new way that stuff ends up in the so-called mainstream media.
And it happens each and every day.
Now media matters, listen, this program will take something out of context.
Uh and the next later that night, the next day, there's MSNBC with their version of it.
It's just, it's it's a pipeline.
And it's the latest example of reporters not reporting, just being lazy.
They just consult websites, blogs, and the stuff that doesn't matter how obscure the blog, doesn't matter how uh unheard of the blogger is.
It doesn't matter the resume or the uh uh experience of the blog, doesn't matter.
As long as it's published somewhere, the printed word is all the weight it needed is needed.
Doesn't matter who prints it, doesn't matter who writes it.
As long as it's on a website that has a professional sounding name to it or a logo or whatever, it becomes qualified.
Well, the reason I'm mentioning this is because there is an obscure, I don't even remember the name of it.
A friend of mine sent it to me today.
There is an obscure sports blog or website out there, which has as a I'm gonna make a prediction to you, has this story today.
And I never heard of this guy.
You haven't either.
He probably somebody never gets out of his underwear, sitting in his bedroom writing about this stuff, but because it's published and because it's on the internet, it has instant credibility.
And his point is that Tim Tebow has become the most polarizing figure in America, and particularly American sports.
Now, what I want to see, how many days is it going to take before that shows up in USA Today Sports Section?
Or Sports Illustrated or ESPN's website or someplace that people would think is a credible news outlet.
Now let's look at this.
Tim Tebow, the most polarizing figure in sports.
It is manifestly untrue.
There's nothing polarizing about Tebow.
What is polarizing, if anything, is the reporting on Tebow.
What's polarizing is the media saying, alleging, accusing whatever various things about Tebow.
He can't play, he's too much oriented to God, he's got his throwing motions way too long, he can't pull, it can never be a pocket.
All of these things.
Everything that they said he couldn't do, he did yesterday.
And he did it against the league's number one defense, the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Everything they said he couldn't, it's nothing polarizing.
Everybody in Denver loves him, except for some of the Broncos management.
Everybody, where's the polarizing?
And I've always said, you know, refer to me as Rush Limbaugh, the controversial.
What's controversial?
Everybody in this audience loves me.
Everybody in this audience agrees with me.
Where's the polarizing?
There's nothing polarizing about Tebow.
I don't even think this little guy, this blogger, I don't even know who he is who wrote this, knows what the word means.
What's polarizing about Tebow?
Tebow has a whole country pulling for him.
He hasn't split the country down the middle.
Tebow's not inspiring a bunch of hate other than in the media.
And places in the Broncos frontal office.
But that's another story.
So let's just see.
How many days does it take before the so-called mainstream sports media picks up this theme?
That Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow is the most polarizing figure in sports.
And then we'll get a poll.
Is it Tebow or is it LeBron James?
Or is it Derek James?
Throw a name out there.
Whoever.
We'll just see.
I got to take a quick time out here, folks.
Sit tight, much more straight ahead, right after we take a brief break here on the EIB network.
Don't go away.
Hi, how are you?
Welcome back, Rush Limbo here on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
There's another news story that came out.
This is the New York Post.
But I guess it's actually been in uh in more places than I just read it first in the New York Post.
Jody Cantor, who is an infobabe reporter for the New York Times, has a book on the Obamas about to come out.
It was some excerpts published over the weekend.
And they reveal in this in this book that the White House put on a big Halloween party in 2009, right in the middle of the worst of the economic downturn.
And it was an Alice in Wonderland themed party.
It had Johnny Depp come in character and run the whole thing along with a Hollywood director named Tim Burton.
They had vials.
I mean, this is a Hollywood theme party, had vials of blood, but it was a, I mean, just an over-the-top, no expenses spared.
Halloween party in the White House that they didn't want anybody outside the White House to know about.
And the reason they didn't want anybody to know about it is because they were putting on the dog and they were spending money left and right and having a grand old time in the midst of massive economic pain throughout the country.
Unemployment, job prospects dwindling for a lot of people.
But this private Halloween party that they gave for themselves took place in the state dining room.
And as I say, the room were decorated by Tim Burton and included costumes.
George Lucas actually sent Chewbacca from Star Wars.
Actually sent the costume and an actor to be Chewbacca.
They drank punch out of blood vials.
And Johnny Depp was there in the character Mad Hatter or some such thing.
And the media obviously knew about it.
And didn't say a word about it.
They sat on it, knowing that such extravagance and weirdness might not fly too well in a country than the middle of one of its worst recessions.
And now it's come out, and the White House out of the media knew about this, which I don't doubt.
I don't doubt for a minute the media knew all about this and was hoping to be invited to it.
Anyway, we got more on that too, so sit tight.
This book by uh Jody Cantor, New York Times, that reveals this Halloween party in 2009 also talks about the problem that Michelle Obama has with her husband's staff.
Didn't get along with Ram Emanuel, didn't get along with anybody in the West Wing.
And primarily because Obama's staff is not radical enough.
And I have heard fairly credible, reliable sources, that Obama is influenced by two people, his wife and Valerie Jarrett, that there are two women who basically, and I don't know, I'm not mean to say the disparaging, I'm just describing them.
Two women, Valerie Jarrett and Michelle Obama, who basically are on this guy's case every day and telling him what to do, where to go, how to do it, so forth and so on.
Uh, and that Michelle is just profoundly radical.
They've kept it quiet, they've done a good job of making her look like she's doesn't do much except raise the two daughters, but that she's really an activist in there and not getting along with the Obama staff because they're just not radical enough.
They're not moving far enough, fast enough, quick enough to the left to satisfy her.
That's that's all in this book.
Anyway, I'm I'm reading the New York Post expose on this book about this Halloween party, Alice in Wonderland Halloween party.
And my first reaction, so what?
Who would anybody have cared anyway if the news had gotten out?
I know it's Halloween, October 2009, and we're right in the midst of the stimulus not working, but still, in October of 2009, there's still a lot of hope.
You don't have a lot of people still with the guts to criticize Obama.
There are beginning to be at that point in time, some brave souls on the right starting to take shots at the worthlessness of the stimulus and all that, but pretty much is still in this uh first-year honeymoon phase.
There's not a whole lot of criticism.
The country is hurting.
And I read the story, and I said it makes a big deal here.
The White House went out of the way to cover this up to keep this quiet.
The book reveals how any official announcement of the glittering affair coming at a time when Tea Party activists and voters, furious over the lagging economy, 10% unemployment, bank bailouts, Obama's health care plan being uh staging protests, quickly vanished down the rabbit hole.
White House officials were so nervous about how a splashy Hollywood-esque party would look to jobless Americans or their representatives in Congress, who would soon vote on health care that the event was not discussed publicly, and Tim Burton and Johnny Depp's contributions went unacknowledged, the book says.
However, the White House made certain that more humble Halloween festivities earlier that day were well reported by the press corpse, and then the Obamas went inside.
They basically had a bunch of kids over on Halloween, and that's what made the news.
You know, traditional White House Halloween bash.
But then they closed it all off and went and had this big decadent Hollywood-esque type Henry VIII bash.
Unbeknownst to reporters, the state dining room had been transformed into a secretive White House wonderland.
Tim Burton decorated it in his signature creepy comic style.
His film version was about to be released, and he had turned the room into the Mad Hatters Tea Party.
Anyone think that's a coincidence, right?
In the middle here of the Tea Party uprising, the aftermath of the 20, well, they're getting heading into the 2010 elections.
And here they're having a madhatter tea party, a long table set with antique looking linens, enormous stuffed animals sitting in the chairs, tiered serving plates with treats like bone-shaped meringue cookies, reports the book.
Fruit punch was served in blood vials at the bar.
Burton's own mad hatter, the actor Johnny Depp presided over the scene in full costume, standing up at a table to welcome everybody in character.
The book also reveals this little anecdote.
One morning during his Senate campaign, Obama did not show up to a meeting with donors.
After a frantic search, a White House staffer named Peter Coffey called Obama's barber shop to find that, yeah, he was there.
The president then confronted Peter Coffey about the call later in the day.
Obama said the relationship between a black man and his barber is sacred.
For failing to understand this truth, your punishment is to watch the movie Barbershop.
And for further punishment, you'll then watch the sequel, Barbershop 2.
So Obama's making race jokes to this guy who tried to find him.
You can't you can't interrupt me when I'm at the barber.
That's a sacred relationship.
Here, you gotta go watch Barbershop.
Which I think starred Ice Cube, if I'm not mistaken.
Now, here's here's the point of all this.
When I read about this, I said, Well, who would care?
Obama supporters wouldn't care about this.
They had thrown lavish parties in the White House and in Stevie Wonder up there.
They were doing all kinds of stuff.
They were turning the White House into a uh well, the media reported as the cultural return of art and entertainment.
What any big deals?
They have a big Halloween party.
The idea that the Obamas consider themselves above and beyond and not at all in any way related to common people, what's surprising about this?
Well, the American people don't get upset about anything.
Why would they get upset about this?
I just I but the White House obviously was afraid there'd be some people get upset if they so they they did their best to keep it secret.
Now, I don't believe the press didn't know.
I think the press went along with keeping it secret.
No way the press didn't know this.
Whether I'm right or wrong, the White House thought people would care.
It was clear.
Now another thing you can then ask is, well, if we didn't know about this, what else is going on in there that we don't know about?
And that's a legitimate question.
What else is happening in the White House that the press knows about, but is choosing not to report.
And then there was late last week, some blogger, somebody took a picture of Marie Antoinette, a painting of Marie Antoinette, and put Michelle Obama's face in it.
Put it out, I think it was a blogger, I forget where it was.
Anyway, the media, people in the media who saw it immediately started charging racism and insensitivity, and how dare they make fun of the first lady this way.
But the point I don't know how you get that.
How in the world, there was nothing racial about it.
I mean, how are you going to put Michelle Obama in a picture and not portray her as African American?
And how do you do that?
There's no racism in it all.
But that anyway, that was the allegation.
The point about this is, though, is if you look at Michelle Obama and her vacations and her separate travel, she does consider herself royalty.
And I have a theory, folks.
I uh I actually I don't doubt, and I'm I'm not retracting anything I've said about liberals, Marxists, and their and their ideological aims, their idea-driven aims, but I also think that there is something else that explains all of this.
The cylindras, the health care waivers, the entire regime.
And I really think it's nothing more complicated than money.
I think you have, I'll never forget Marion Barry, the 1984 Democrat Convention, San Francisco.
And I don't know what specifically he was referring to, but he was the theme of his speech was tonight, tonight we're on the inside.
Meaning, okay, finally we've got our chance to be in charge of things.
And then when Mayor David Dinkins was elected uh mayor for life in New York City, I remember some of the civil rights coalition people saying, all right, now it's our turn to have the money.
Now, I believe that in addition to whatever drives Obama and his party ideologically, also near the top of the list is the pursuit of money without having to work for it, being able to pass it out to their friends and set their friends up to be wealthy for the rest of their lives.
I think there's all kinds of that going on, too.
And I think if you look at the way the Obamas live, with Michelle with her separate vacations and not being concerned about how much it costs to take separate airplanes, state there's no question in my mind that they view this as whatever else they view it as an opportunity to live high on the hog without having it cost them a dime.
And if they justify it by thinking, well, we'd we deserve this or we're owed this because of what's been done to us and our ancestors, all these, who knows.
Like that's I think it's part of it.
I also think that it is why the Republican establishment wants back and everybody in Washington wants to be in charge of the money.
Everybody wants to run the committee chairman the committees and be the chairman.
Everybody wants to be in charge of the budget.
Everybody wants to have power over it.
Do not discount ever the money, and do not, folks, another thing not to fall forward, do not think that however wealthy somebody is, they run around thinking they have enough because nobody ever thinks they have enough.
And no matter how much you have, it's very easy.
It's not hard at all to learn how to spend every dime in your pocket.
It's easy.
Now, people who've never had two or three million dollars think, my gosh, what would I spend it on?
You'd be surprised once you have it.
It's not that hard.
And the concept of, well, gosh, don't you have enough?
That's a myth.
That's something the liberals use to try to guilt other people out of pursuing achievement and so forth.
But believe me, no matter what they have, it's never enough.
And I think there's a there's a lot of reasons why the Obamas, the Democrats are doing what they're doing, in addition to the ideology, in addition to whatever grievances they have about this country and its past,
and however they think it needs to be cut down to size, and however they think the people who have gotten rich need to be gotten even with the mix is their chance to get their share without having to work for it, and set themselves up and their friends up for life in the process.
I don't doubt that that's a factor here.
And they're clearly willing to use the power, and they don't care about the debt that the country is involved in.
They don't think that we are at a point of peril.
The idea that the national debt is now greater than the economy, no big deal.
They've been hearing all their lives how the national debt's too high, the national debt's going to cribble a country, but it never has.
While they are hearing all of this horrible stuff about the debt, uh the deficits, uh, all the tax rates, they look around, they see people doing just fine, living high on the hog, and the national debt's not hurting anybody.
The richer getting richer, and that's who they want to be.
And if they don't know how to earn a lot of money working for it, they'll go someplace where they can legally steal it or apportion it to themselves and their friends, and that's a large part of what's going on with this regime.
So when you have a big time Hollywood party like this or any other show of extravagance, to me, it's patently obvious what's going on here.
Bunch of people taking advantage of having control over all that money, a chance to get a lot of it without having to work for it.
Under the guise of being entitled to it.
Pulling the strings, because in their view, this is what all their predecessors have done.
I'll tell you what really woke me up to this.
And nobody is more cynical than I am when it comes to Congress, including Will Rogers.
And I don't know about you.
But in the last time flies, I think it's two months safe to say, when I learned, along with the rest of you, when I learned that Congress made it legal for themselves to use insider trading.
That's all I needed to know.
When they specifically exempted themselves by statute from the insider trading laws, when Congress passed a law saying we can use insider trading, they have a totally different perception of themselves than we do.
When it comes to morality, when it comes to ethics, when it comes to why they are there.
When I heard that, you know, you live and learn.
Lights still go off.
Red flags still get raised.
But that told me a lot.
I've got to take a break.
Be back before you know it.
Don't go away.
There is a story on the Drudge Report today from Sarah Palin.
In which Sarah Palin says that the White House wants Mitt Romney to be the Republican nominee.
Now, not only did I tell you that the Broncos were going to beat the Steelers.
For months I have been telling you that the Democrats want it Romney.
And I you all know it.
You've been listening here, and you've heard people call me and tell me I don't know what I'm talking about, that I'm full of it, that they're scared of Romney, that they're scared of Romney's the only guy that can win, and I've said no, and I've stood tough.
And I've said they can't wait for what's Occupy Wall Street all about but running against Romney.
He's the Wall Street guy in our roster.
And then Romney care.
And I've laid it all out.
So here comes Palin.
She says it and makes news, and Donna Brazil has said it.
She was on uh, let's see, this is post-debate coverage on ABC Saturday night, George Stephanopoulos, uh Democrat Party hack disguised as a debate moderator on ABC had this discussion with uh with John Carl and Donna Brazil.
Mitt Romney won tonight because no one touched him.
And for Democrats, you know what?
It was good news for us.
Why is that?
Because we believe that the weakest candidate is a candidate that the Republicans are not attacking.
And that's Mitt Romney.
Oh, come on.
No, you don't believe that, Donna.
That's Stefano.
You know, but what Stephanopoulos is saying, shut up, Donna.
What the hell are you doing, Donna?
Did you not take your meds?
That was come on, Donna, what do you do?
You know you don't believe that.
Donna, shut up.
You know, she's feeling her oats there.
So Palin has come out and said here's Donna Brazil saying it.
Oh, yeah, the one guy not being, she's she's practically gleeful here.
And I'll tell you why she's gleeful.
She's gleeful because what she sees nominee Romney getting a nomination.
And so she thinks it's okay to blow the lid off this cover now.
Mitt Romney won tonight because no one touched him.
For Democrats, that's good news for us.
And Stephanie, whoa, whoa, whoa, why is that?
Well, because we believe the weakest candidate is the candidate the Republicans are not attacking, and that's Romney.
And Steph, oh, you don't believe that.
I guarantee you she had a talking to.
They had to talk into her with her after this.
Because this, that's a major fault.
The Democrat, the line that's supposed to come out of the Democrat Party, is they're scared of Romney.
The line is, oh no, they don't want to fail.
Romney's the toughest guy to fail.
Oh, that that's that's that's that's the line.
And they they know, folks, the Democrats know that our experts are stupid enough to believe that the Democrats will be honest and tell us who they really don't want to face.
I'll tell you who they don't want to face when we come back.
The Democrats are afraid of any candidate they have sought to destroy.
And you can start with Sarah Palin.
You can move on to Santorum, any, any conservative who showed any interest, the Democrats set out to destroy.
That's who they're genuinely afraid of.
They are not hammering Mitt Romney at all.
And Donna Brazil left the cat out of the bag.
Don't doubt me.
▲
Export Selection