All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 10, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:56
November 10, 2011, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host of this program make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying, ladies and gentlemen, as big as I'm saying them.
El Rushbo, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all-feeling, talent on loan from God, Maha Rushi, a highly trained broadcast specialist, America's real anchorman, the doctor of democracy, and truth detector, all combined in one harmless, lovable little fuzzball.
What did I do with it?
Ah, here it is.
This is the last day.
Last day of the two if-by-tea sweepstakes in honor of the Marine Corps' 236th birthday and Veterans Day.
This is the unbelievable twofbit.com sweepstakes, where there are four grand prize winners, four couples with five days and four nights in Honolulu, and a special price using offer code Rush of $19.99 per case of tea.
Last day that you have a chance to be automatically registered in the sweepstakes by buying case of tea.
I've got more details coming up as the program unfolds, but I know people have been sitting around waiting, because it's a three-day deal.
This is it.
11.59 p.m. tonight Pacific time is the last chance that you'll have to enter by purchasing a case of tea.
Audio soundbite, Barack Obama, October 15th, 2008 in Hempstead, New York, the third and final presidential debate between Barack Hussein Obama and Senator John McCain.
The moderator was Bob Schieffer of CBS News, who said, give us specifics.
Give us some specifics, Senator Obama, on what you're going to cut.
I think it's important for the American public to understand that the $750 billion rescue package, if it's structured properly, and as president, I will make sure it's structured properly, means that ultimately taxpayers get their money back.
And that's important to understand.
Hold it a second.
Wait a minute.
I didn't even know that was coming.
Got to go back to the top here.
That's an added bonus.
He's talking about his porcupine bill here.
We haven't even gotten to what I thought was going to be the meat and potatoes of this.
Failure to be able to name any places to cut.
He just said if it's structured properly and as president, I'll structure it.
See, this is the kind of stuff that makes the crease in the pants crowd think he's brilliant.
Well spoken.
It's structured properly.
And as president, I will make sure it's structured properly.
Okay, case closed.
So he's going to take care of it.
See, no doubts.
That means ultimately taxpayers get their money back.
By the way, speaking of your taxes next year going up, everybody's an average of $3,000 to $4,000.
Your health care premiums are going up.
And here he's saying in 2008, you're going to get your money back with his stupid plan.
Well, an added bonus.
I didn't even know that was in there.
Here it is.
I didn't remember that.
It's important for the American public to understand that the $750 billion rescue package, if it's structured properly, and as president, I will make sure it's structured properly, means that ultimately taxpayers get their money back.
And that's important to understand.
But there is no doubt that we've been living beyond our means, and we're going to have to make some adjustments.
Now, what I've done throughout this campaign is to propose a net spending cut.
I haven't made a promise about cut some of these programs, sir.
Absolutely.
So let me get to that.
What I want to emphasize, though, is that I have been a strong proponent of pay-as-you-go.
Every dollar that I've proposed, I've proposed an additional cut so that it matches.
And some of the cuts, just to give you an example, we spend $15 billion a year on subsidies to insurance companies.
It doesn't, under the Medicare plan, it doesn't help seniors get any better.
It's not improving our health care system.
It's just a giveaway.
Okay, Schieffer, mildly frustrated, says, Senator McCain, the question was, what are you going to cut?
Energy independent.
We have to have nuclear power.
We have to stop sending $700 billion a year to countries that don't like us very much.
It's wind, tide, solar, natural gas, nuclear, offshore drilling, which Senator Obama has opposed.
And the point is that we become energy independent and we will create millions of jobs, millions of jobs in America.
I would have cross-the-board spending freeze, okay?
Some people say that's a hatchet.
That's a hatchet, and then I would get out of scalpel, okay?
I have fought against, well, one of them wouldn't be the marketing assistance program.
Another one would be a number of subsidies for ethanol.
So McCain finally got specific.
Obama never was.
And it's just, they look the other way.
But here's, I'm just, I just play this soundbite because everybody, Tizzy in the media and people on our side are going nuts over Rick Perry's gaff.
Let's get to, this is a great soundbite.
Before we get to the debate soundbites, Joe Walsh, up and coming rising star in the Republican House of Representatives, he is from Illinois.
He held a cup of Joe with Joe Walsh meeting with his constituents last Sunday in Gurney, Illinois.
And during the QA, one of his constituents said, look at the people, Paulson, and whoever else.
They keep going from big bank to the government and they go back to the banks.
They just keep rotating government to big banks.
And Walsh had had enough.
I agree with you about that.
That's not the problem.
The problem is you've got to be consistent.
And I don't want government meddling in the marketplace.
It's not the private marketplace that created this mess.
What created this mess is your government, which has demanded for years that everybody be in a home.
Don't blame banks and don't blame the marketplace for the mess we're in right now.
I am tired of hearing that crap.
This pisses me off.
Too many people don't listen.
There are already mechanisms in place to do that.
Are they doing their job?
No.
But what do you want to do?
You want to bombard them with more regulations, more government?
Government screwed this problem up.
What do you want?
Well, you know what you've got?
He has on it.
Oh, you know what you've got?
They got Dodd Frank.
They got Dodd-Frank now that's tie in everybody's hands.
You wanted more reform, more regulation?
That's what you got.
Do you want more regulation?
Is that what you want?
Do you want Dodd-Frank?
Is that what you want?
I need more coffee.
Joe Walsh, Republican from Illinois, trying to pound home to his constituents just who was and who wasn't responsible for the housing mess, the subprime mortgage loan, because he got a question.
Look at these bankers.
They keep going from the bank to the government to the bank.
It's a revolving door.
And it is, but they're not the problem.
It was your government.
All right, let's move on to Rochester, Michigan.
Oakland University.
Live on CNBC, the Republican Candidates for President debate.
During the debate, while talking about regulating big business, Governor Rick Perry of Texas sought to identify the three agencies that he would whack.
I will tell you, it's three agencies of government when I get there that are gone.
Commerce, education, and the what's the third one there?
Let's see.
We need five.
Oh, five.
Okay.
Commerce, education, and the EPA.
EPA.
There you go.
Seriously?
Is EPA the one you were talking about?
No, sir.
No, sir.
We were talking about the agencies of government.
The EPA needs to be rebuilt.
But you're out about it.
You can't name the third one?
The third agency of government.
I would do away with the education, the commerce.
And let's see.
I can't.
The third one, I can't.
Sorry.
Oops.
Mitt Romney was helping him out there.
That's who was up at Commerce.
And it was, you're talking EPA, Rick?
EPA?
I thought it's kind of funny, frankly.
It's like Obama can't remember anything about Cylindra, and Holder can't remember anything about Fast and Furious.
But anyway, they're just looking for ways to edge these people out.
And even, as I say, conservatives on our side, ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to just repeat what I think is going on here.
You have, and I'm questioned about this every day.
For example, I've been inundated with questions from people.
Why did Karl Rove grant Gloria Allred credibility in this Herman Kane business?
And the answer to me of something like that is obviously that Herman Kane's not Carl Rove's guy.
And this is a primary.
It's an election.
It's an omni-process.
And Carl wants his guy to win, whoever he is.
And Carl probably opposed Herman Kane for a bunch of reasons, like he was opposed to Christine O'Donnell and Sharon Engel not thinking they can win.
He probably doesn't think Heron Kane can win.
I mean, if you want me to honestly analyze it.
But I think that what inspires them here is that they're still ticked off.
I think some of these guys on our side of them, you remember Mark Murphy, Mike Murphy, Mike Murphy.
Remember, he was livid.
He's a campaign consultant.
He was livid over Christine O'Donnell beating, what was the guy's name?
I don't even remember.
Yeah, yeah, the bald-headed guy, Mike Castle.
He was just livid that Christine O'Donnell won that primary and that Castle didn't have a prayer because Castle was the only guy could win.
And these guys, this is where this gets important for these guys are obsessed with being the ones to tell their candidates what to do to win.
And it's basically get independents, get the middle of the road, guys.
They make their money there.
They tell their candidates for whom they work, the Democrats are going to get 40%.
You're going to get 40% of the Republicans.
And who gets that people at bunch in the middle?
And I'm the one that can get them.
I'm the one that can tell you how to get the independents.
And they just look at a candidate like Sharon Angle or Christine O'Donnell says, the independents are never going to go for them no matter what you do.
It's impossible.
Can't win.
We don't want to be a part of it.
And if you think you can, if you think you know more than I do, you run the campaign.
You go to.
And he was just, I guarantee you, they were happy that O'Donnell lost because they made him look good.
And there's still, I think some of them, and I don't mean Murphy specifically here, just a whole group of them.
I think they still have an ego drive here to prove they were right about O'Donnell and Angle.
And that's one of the reasons why they're doing what they're doing to oppose people they think are going to lose and people they don't want to win.
There's also that aspect of it.
That's the thing.
HR just said, don't they want to win at the end of the day?
I think that you've hit the nail on the head with the question.
And you have actually sufficed what the, or provided what the good caller does, make the host look good.
I think they are more concerned, our consultants, with holding the House and winning the Senate.
Think they believe deep down in the depths of their soul that Obama can't be beat.
I think that they look at Mitt Romney as the single only hope we have of taking the Senate, even if he loses the presidential race.
I think you go back, snurdly, you stop and think about this, and you're going to realize I'm right again.
And I wish I had thought of this months ago.
O'Donnell, Engel were opposed because they wanted to win the Senate.
They didn't care about any.
Remember, it was the midterms, and they wanted to win the Senate.
They wanted their committee chairmanships.
They wanted to be in charge of the money.
When you're a senator, it can be said that you're in charge of one 100th of $3, $4 trillion, whatever amount we're going to spend that year.
It's a lot of power.
And you run the committees, that's even more power.
And they were ticked off because they didn't think that the Senate was going to go our way with those two candidates.
So I really believe that they're looking at Romney not because he can beat Obama, but because he can limit the damage in the Senate and House races, which is what they really want.
I think, and I do believe that in some cases, and I'm not prepared to name names right now, I do believe in some cases on our side, they would rather Obama win than a full-throated conservative beat him because they don't control the conservative.
They don't control the Tea Party.
They don't control where that victorious conservative candidate would come from.
Well, I do too.
But the thing you remember about 2010 was that a lot of the seats that we picked up that got us to a majority number were marginal districts.
They're not guaranteed re-elects, not these so-called safe seats.
It's going to take a lot of work to keep winning them in perpetuity.
And if the base ends up being suppressed, depressed, if something happens in the energy, you know, the can't wait to get out there and vote aspect, if that declines at all, and if the unions are able to get out to vote on the left and they're able to get their energy back up, then some of those seats that we won in 2010 are not guaranteed.
They're marginal and we might lose them.
And if the Democrats are out there feeling good candidates, I'm just telling you how the inside the Beltway consultants think on our side.
These are not my thoughts right now.
I'm telling you how our guys are thinking.
So they're thinking we could lose the House.
I guarantee you, they are thinking with the wrong presidential candidate, we could lose the House, not to mention lose the White House race.
Well, they don't want to lose the House.
They want to win the Senate.
They think Obama's going to get reelected, and that's the best way to stop him is to have both houses, House and Senate.
And they look at Romney as, hey, cool.
He's a moderate.
He's not total ribald conservative.
But they think, because he sounds intelligent, he's a smooth talker.
Now he doesn't have many gaffes that he can, while losing the race for the presidency, still bring along a number of victorious Senate and House races.
Now, I think the only way to pull it off with Romney is if sufficient and consistent pressure is brought on him to run on conservative policies, like Daniel Henninger said in the Wall Street Journal about three weeks or a month ago, you're going to have to constantly push Romney to the right.
That's not where he naturally lives.
And so you're going to have to push him to run on conservative policies and produce and project a distinguishable contrast with Obama.
I'm being told, folks, I have to take a break.
I, the host, looking at the clock, don't know what I'm doing.
Okay, go.
Hi, how are you?
Welcome back, El Rushbaugh and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
We are coming to you today from Los Angeles.
We're here today and tomorrow, and back to the phones to nation's capital, Washington, D.C.
This is Brian.
Great to have you, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, mega dittos to you.
It's an honor to speak with you.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
I've been listening to you since I was in junior high.
I don't remember what I said exactly, but I was with my family.
I was probably 14 years old.
I said something, and my grandpa's response was, Has he been listening to Rush Limbaugh?
And that's when I figured I needed to tune into you.
Well, and then it was shortly after that that you arrived.
And I promise you, I'm going to get on and order me some Tuafai tea.
I had a question for you, though.
And I'm wondering if you see any comparisons, any similarities between Barack Obama and Herman Cain, aside from the obvious, and what I mean by that is we all know Barack Obama was hugely unqualified to be president.
He had no private company experience.
He had limited public experience.
But I look at Herman Kaine.
He never had a job.
Exactly.
I mean, he was just so grossly unqualified.
But I look at Herman Cain and I want to like him.
He's not the establishment.
He's not the Mitt Romney.
But I look at his experience.
He doesn't have any public experience.
And I wonder if lack of legislative experience will impair him a little bit.
And then I look at his public company experience.
And granted, he was CEO of Godfather's Pizza.
Let me answer this further.
This time is dwindling here.
Politics is a business, like any other, and it has its own track of success.
It has its own ladder.
I mean, there are certain things that you do have to do to advance.
I mean, you could win an election being a novice, but then when you get there, you can be outmaneuvered.
You can be outsmarted if you don't know what you're doing about how the business of politics works.
But I want to give you another way to think of this.
Since you are obviously a critical thinker and open-minded, I want you to put yourself in his shoes for the past 10 days, two weeks.
And I want you to stop and consider everything.
This is not an endorsement.
I'm just, I want you to think about this.
Everything he has been through.
And where is he today after it?
At that debate last night, he was simply outstanding.
Now, he has been subjected to an outrageous smear media campaign, and he's handled it like a man.
He has not cracked.
He's not caved.
He has not gone.
His attitude doesn't appear to have gone negative or sour.
He doesn't appear to be tainted by this.
I see somebody here who is showing some incredible discipline, powerfully disciplined.
And he's upbeat after all of this, unflappable.
He's laughing about it.
He shows some wit and some intelligence, and he is focused.
He keeps running around there talking about his 999 plan.
He's not, this has not, even he's had to address it.
So you might want to look at him, and again, I'm not endorsing, but you might want to look at him in a different way here and ask yourself how you would be after 10 days of an entire political party trying to ruin your life, your character, your reputation, and your future.
Great to have you with us today, folks.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, where I am doing what I was born to do.
This is the last day, ladies and gentlemen, the final day of our 2IFBIT.com sweepsticks.
This is the third day.
We've been at it since Tuesday.
And what's going on here on November 10th today, United States Marine Corps is 236 years old.
And we here at the EIB Network and 2FBIT are, as you well know by now, we are just extremely proud of the men and women that serve this great nation in all branches of the military.
We hear stories every day of families separated for months at a time with their husband, their son, their daughter, worlds away defending our country.
The sacrifice that these people endure, volunteer for, is immeasurable.
They're the finest we have.
They are the backbone of our country.
They are the stock.
They are the people, along with many others that make this country work, and they don't complain.
And we, and speaking for millions of you in this audience, are eternally grateful.
We started 2F by T.
We partnered up with the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, which provides college scholarships for the children of Marines killed in action.
That is who we sponsor.
So what we're doing in honor of this important week, including Veterans Day, not just the Marine Corps birthday, 2IF by T is hosting a very special sweepstakes.
We're going to send four grand prize-winning couples.
That'd be eight people for those of you in Riolinda.
Four grand prize-winning couples to Honolulu, Hawaii.
Each grand prize winner will receive a four-night, five-day trip to Honolulu.
He'll stay at Waikiki Tea.
None of this three days, two nights, basically turn around when you get there and go home.
Five days, four nights on Waikiki.
Airfare, accommodations, beautiful.
We're going to have credit toward meals, and there will be a tour to Pearl Harbor, the Arizona Memorial, and so forth.
And there are other prizes in addition to the grand prize winners.
10 second-place winners that will receive a Hawaiian gift basket and the brand new Apple iPod Touch.
But we're not through here to make this exciting and enticing.
We are lowering the price, 2F by T per case, significantly from $2,376 down to $19.99 per case.
Free shipping nationwide if you use the offer code Rush at checkout.
Use the offer code Rush and the $19.99 per case price is yours.
Now, as I said earlier, we're the proud sponsor of the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
They, a credible organization that gives thousands of dollars in scholarships to the children of fallen heroes that were lost serving our great country.
So you've got until 11.59 Pacific time tonight.
And all you have to do is you're automatically entered when you buy a case of tea.
All of the rules are plainly on display at 2IFBT.com.
You can call, by the way, if you don't want to do this on the internet and you're still, you're eligible to win here at 866-662-1776.
That's our call center.
The final day, 11:59 p.m. Pacific time tonight is when this expires.
It's current sweepstakes.
Five days, four nights in Honolulu for four grand prize-winning couples.
ToifByTea.com is the website.
Who's next?
Where are we going?
Livermore, California.
Hi, Ray.
I'm glad that you waited.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Rush, it's great to have you.
Thank you for your professorship for the Institute.
Mega Marine 236th Birthday Dittos and Veterans Day Dittos as well.
Thank you to our active service servicemen.
We were talking about the electric car in the first hour, the plug-in electric car.
And I wanted to make myself available for that.
But real quick, I think it was Tom Petty had an electric car plugged in here in the Bay Area at his warehouse, and it burned to the ground under the same kind of conditions of the story you read earlier.
And so what I want to do, in the name of spreading it around, spreading the wealth around, in the name of occupiers, I have a fossil fuel Honda generator that I will make available for electric car users.
They can come over, they can plug in, and I think for about five gallons of gas, we can send you about 60 or 120 miles, and you guys, you know, we can all work together as the 99ers.
Ah, sweet of you.
Yes, it's the least we can do, Rush.
You know, spread it around.
They're offering a charging service, basically.
Yes, yes.
My fossil fuel-based charging system will power many electric cars, each 60 miles, of course.
Let me ask you a question.
Will your fossil fuel charger charge a battery faster than a non-fossil fuel charger?
Wait a minute.
Is there a fossil fuel, a non-fossil fuel charger?
Well, I'm just a regular blue-collar working guy, Rush, so I don't know that there are really any regular non-fossil fuel chargers.
I guess some of these hydroelectric dams that they're trying to tear down in my state could be considered non-fossil fuel chargers trying to take them down.
Well, the power plant is a fossil fuel charger.
That's coal.
Correct.
And I don't think you can charge your car yet with a windmill or a solar panel.
So it may.
See, this is one of the things we kind of get smug and laugh at because all these people are thinking that they're saving the planet and all this.
All kinds of coal is being used to charge their car that wouldn't otherwise be used if they were using gasoline or diesel or what have you.
By the way, I don't know if this is breaking news, but I just found out about it.
This crash hour, babe, Karen Crasher, one of the, what is it now, five women charging or alleging something about Herman Kane?
She says that she will, it is breaking news.
CNN, she will not do a news conference without the other accusers.
She won't go out there alone.
She's only going to do it as part of a panel.
Like we said yesterday, it's a lot easier to escape scrutiny if you're part of a crowd.
That's true leadership, too.
That's guts and bravery and courage and all those things that you want in a government employee.
No, I'm not going out there unless all of the other girls show up, too.
It's just that simple, Mr. Limbo.
I'm not going to be part of this.
I'm not going to subject myself singularly and individually to the retribution of Mr. Kane and his powerful lawyer out to destroy us all.
If I'm going to do it, the other women will come forward.
And minstrel cycles synchronize.
That's how we get the All-American First Cavalry Amazon Battalion in the U.S. military.
She said, by the way, Crash Hour is saying that none of the other accusers have returned her phone calls.
They're not responding out there to her phone calls.
She's trying to put this panel deal together, and it isn't happening.
I'm looking here.
Ann Coulter has a column about this at human events.
And it's over here.
Ah, this is the stack.
Hang in there when we're here, folks.
Yeah, here it is.
David Axelrod's pattern of sexual misbehavior.
Herman Kane has spent his life living and working all over the country, Indiana, Georgia, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, Washington.
But Herman Cain's never been, he's never worked in Chicago.
So it's curious that all these sexual harassment allegations against him emanate from Chicago.
Home of the Daly Machine and Obama consigliary David Axelrod.
Suspicions had already fallen on Sheila O'Grady, who is close with David Axelrod, went straight from being a former Chicago Mayor Richard Daly's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association as being the person who dug up Herman Kaine's personnel records from the National Restaurant Association.
Sheila O'Grady, close with David Axelrod, went straight from being Mayor Daly's chief of staff to president of the Illinois Restaurant Association.
She's the person who dug up Kane's personnel records at the National Restaurant Association.
The Daly-controlled Illinois Restaurant Association works hand in glove with the National Association.
Strangely enough, Herman Kane's short three-year tenure at the NRA is evidently the only period in his decades-long career which he's alleged to have been a sexual predator too.
Herman Kane is 65 years old, and the three years he ran the NRA is the only time he's been accused of being a sexual predator.
After Sheila O'Grady's name surfaced in connection with the miraculous appearance of Kane's personnel files from the Restaurant Association, she issued a Clinton-esque denial of any involvement in producing them by vigorously denying that she knew Kane when he was at the National Restaurant Association.
And now, after a week of conservative eye rolling over unspecified anonymous accusations against Herman Kane, we've suddenly got very specific sexual assault allegations from an all-new accuser out of Chicago.
The Politico couldn't produce a specific single charge, but lo and behold, the Daly Machine found one.
Where Herman Kane has never worked.
Herman Kane has never lived in Chicago, but you know who has?
David Axelrod.
And guess who lived in Axelrod's very building?
That's right.
Kane's latest accuser, Sharon Byalik.
By Alik's accusations were very specific, but they also demonstrated why anonymous accusations are worthless.
Within 24 hours of BuyAlick's press conference, friends and acquaintances of hers stepped forward to say that she's a gold digger, that she was constantly in financial trouble.
Her husband now, fiancé bankrupt.
She's filed for personal bankruptcy twice.
And of course, that she'd lived in Axelrod's apartment building at 505 North Lakeshore Drive, where she admits she knew the man the New York Times calls Obama's hired muscle.
You throw in some federal tax evasion, and she's Obama's next cabinet pick.
The reason all this is relevant is that both Axelrod and Daly have a history of smearing political opponents by digging up claims of sexual misconduct against them.
John Brooks, Chicago's former fire commissioner, filed a lawsuit against Daly six months ago, claiming that Daly threatened to smear him with sexual harassment accusations if Brooks didn't resign.
Brooks did resign, and the sexual harassment allegations were later found to be completely false.
Meanwhile, and extensively detailed in her book, Guilty Liberal Victims and Their Assault on America, Coulter writes that the only reason Obama became a senator, allowing him to run for Prexi, is that David Axelrod pulled sealed divorce records out of a hat, first against Obama's Democrat primary opponent, then against Obama's Republican opponent.
One month before the 2004 Democrat primary for U.S. Senate, Obama was way down in the polls, about to lose to Blair Hull, a millionaire securities trader.
But then the Chicago Tribune, where Axelrod used to work, where Herman Kaine's never been, began publishing claims that Hull's second ex-wife, Brenda Sexton, had sought an order of protection against him in her divorce proceedings in 1998.
From then until election day, Hull was embroiled in fighting the allegation that he was a wife beater.
So Hull's lead just a month before the primary collapsed, non-stop media attention to his divorce records.
Obama wins.
Luckily for Axelrod, Obama's opponent and the general had also been divorced.
The Republican nominee's name is Jack Ryan, a graduate of Dartmouth and Harvard Law and business schools, who had left his lucrative partnership at Goldman Sachs to teach at an inner city school in the south side of Chicago.
They pulled his records that he and his wife love to go to these wacko sex clubs.
His wife, Hollywood sex kitten, ex-wife, Jerry Lynn Ryan, had alleged that while they were married, Jack had taken her to these swinger clubs in Paris and New York.
He adamantly denied it all.
In the interest of protecting their son, he also requested the records be permanently sealed, but they were unsealed.
California George Axelrod New unsealed them Ryan in the pulling out of the race.
Alan Keys had twice.
Axelrod has used sexual charges against Obama opponents to get them to get out of the race.
It all adds up.
This is Ann Coulter's column.
I got to take a quick timeout here.
We'll be right back.
Yes, the question is...
The official program observer has a question.
What's the question?
Mm-hmm.
Right.
Right, right.
Both parties have had trifectus and both have lost.
No, you mean consultants, why they go try to go be more moderate or candidates in general?
No, I just, I think it's, I think it's a business.
I think they really believe that the 20%'s where every election's won.
And I think they believe they are moderates, that they're not wacko conservatives or wacko leftists, and most people are like them.
Snerdley is so disturbed by my analysis of a half hour ago of why the Republican establishment is ripping into all of our conservative candidates.
He's really disturbed by it.
Is it for the first time you're figuring out that they're not team players?
That they're business people first?
I know this is a tough thing for a lot of people to accept.
You always think, and the Republicans all on the same side, same objectives?
No way.
No way.
And no, they want to win certain things.
Some of our guys, I'm telling you, do not think Obama's beatable.
Now, I think that I know it makes no sense.
They live in Washington.
It makes sense if you live in Washington.
It makes sense if all your friends are in the liberal media.
It makes sense if that's your life that Obama can't lose.
Obama's God.
If you live in Washington, it's that, if that's your life, it makes almost.
So if you think Obama can't win, if you don't think that any of these conservatives can beat him, then you're going to go pick the guy who can help your candidates for the Senate and the House win so you can chalk up some victories for your business.
You are assuming that everybody's on the same team here.
I have observed that with the death of Ronald Reagan and the death of William Buckley, it's wide open, that there's no discipline on the team.
There is nobody that sets the agenda.
Everybody's trying to be the smartest kid in the room or the power broker or what have you.
It's patently obvious.
And they don't all agree.
Snurdy, this is going to really destroy you.
They don't all agree.
A lot of them don't think Obama's destroying the country.
They don't think that this is anything out of the ordinary.
It's the United States of America.
We just print money.
We've always run deficits since the founding.
Isn't any big deal?
They don't.
Tell you, it's this.
I've been saying this for years.
You ought to have learned it by now.
It's the fastest.
Three hours in media, and already two of them are in the can, folks, as hosted by me.
By the way, folks, this is the last day of the 2F by T sweepstakes, the five days, four nights in Hawaii for four grand prize winners.
You know, if you haven't tried Two Fight Tea, I mean, there's another reason here to purchase them.
It's the best tea out there.
And if you haven't tried any, this is a great day to try it.
It enters you in the sweepstakes.
You can't lose.
▲
Export Selection