All Episodes
Previous Next
May 6, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:14
May 6, 2011, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yeah, I saw that.
The CIA had 40 people over there in that neighborhood.
For what, five months?
Long time.
So the CIA gays.
In other words, this was a long planned operation.
Planned down to the nth degree.
With 40 CIA people as safe houses all over the place.
Collecting intel, preparing for the operation that got bin Laden.
Great to have you back, folks, on Friday.
Let's go.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny, South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Three exciting busy broadcast hours hosted by me, the big voice on the right.
Accused of driving the independence straight back to Obama on the Ted Baxter Show.
It's great to have you with us whenever you want to talk about on Friday's find a telephone number 800 282-2882 and the email address L Rushball at EIB net.com.
Okay.
With the aid of a lot of people too numerous to mention here, it's it's the composite here of having read everything.
Here are the various claims and versions of the story of the raid.
There was a fire fight, there wasn't a fire fight.
Osama was resisting.
He wasn't armed.
The SEALs thought he was reaching for an AK 47 at arm's length that remained at arm's length even after he heard the chopper land.
And after he heard the first shot, first shot took place on the first floor.
Osama's up on the third floor.
The AK-47, he is in his underwear or pajamas or some such thing.
He used his wife as a human shield.
He didn't use his wife as a human shield.
His wife was killed.
There were three wives in there for six months.
Along with him in there for six months.
They accused us of torture.
He didn't use his wife as a shield.
She ran at a seal who shot her in the leg, but she's okay.
Some other woman was used as a shield by somebody downstairs.
Don't know what she was.
She was killed, but maybe she wasn't.
But who was she anyway?
Nobody knows.
Bin Laden's son was killed, unless it was some other guy.
Bin Laden's daughter saw him get killed.
They were going to capture bin Laden until the problem with a helicopter, which was mechanical trouble.
It did a hard, soft landing.
It crashed, it clipped a wall with a tail rotor.
Uh it had to be blown up.
Parts of it were just carted off by the Pakistan military.
They never were going to capture him.
It was a kill mission all the way.
No, it wasn't.
It was a kill mission from the get-go.
No, it wasn't.
They were going to capture him.
The chopper blew up.
No, the SEALs blew it up.
Panetta said the pictures would be released.
Then Obama said they wouldn't be released.
Panetta said there wasn't any video in the situation room.
Hillary said, No, I wasn't frightened about what I was seeing.
Are you kidding?
I just had an allergy problem.
Yeah, Obama was in there.
We got him off the golf course.
He's wearing a golf shirt.
We found him an Air Force windbreaker to put on in the Situation Room.
In the 60 Minutes interview with Steve Croft that's going to be broadcast on Sunday.
The picture's not going to be released.
It would offend Muslim sensibilities.
Which he worries about a lot.
Now this this has been a service.
A blogger here by the name of JJ, and I don't know his last name, but he asserts that Croft, in the interview with Obama, pointed out that ever since Black Hawk Down, Muslims have been doing precisely that.
Filming American bodies being dragged through the streets, filming Daniel Pearl's head being cut off, filming anything and everything.
And apparently Obama got really mad at Croft when Croft pointed that out.
And so CBS cuts that from the interview, and we won't see it.
This is information.
Can't vouch for it, but it is being asserted.
Of course, we got a treasure trove of stuff from the hard drives, but there was no internet access.
There were no phone lines.
And there was no television, but there was a giant satellite dish in the backyard.
What was that for?
If there was no phone and no television and no internet access.
And then yesterday, if he was naked, we were gonna capture him.
And then if he was naked, that meant he wasn't armed, and so we could capture him.
But if he had any kind of clothes on, it meant we had to shoot him.
I mean, this is this is what it has been.
This is the degree to which this story has changed.
And that's that's really just a brief outline.
From the Washington Times today, intelligence analysts are sifting through phone numbers and email addresses found at bin Laden's compound to determine potential links to Pakistani government and military officials, while U.S. officials and analysts raise concerns about the safety of Pakistan's nuclear materials.
According to three U.S. intelligence officials, the race is on to identify what Obama's top counterterrorism advisor, John Brennan, has called bin Laden's support system inside Pakistan.
These sources sought anonymity because they're not authorized to speak to reporters.
Right, but they are leaking this.
And we still don't know.
They haven't shown us a picture of Bin Laden.
one.
So they I mean the stories here have just been all over the place, and now they continue even today in the Washington Times.
Let's see what's next.
Oh, yeah.
You probably heard about this.
This is from WNBC, eyeball news for New York.
An advisory has been sent to law enforcement officials asking them to be vigilant about train security based on information uncovered at bin Laden's mansion hideout.
Officials stress the advisory is general in nature.
The information apparently uncovered from the Bin Laden mansion in Pakistan dates back more than a year, according to NBC News.
U.S. officials say they've not found reference to specific plots.
Instead, they say they found what they call aspirational items, events Al-Qaeda operatives were interested in trying to make happen.
Now I, uh, ladies and gentlemen, am dubious that Al Qaeda and bin Laden wanted to blow up trains.
And the story says based that one of the target dates was the tenth anniversary of 9-11.
But why trains?
We've been told, well, bin Laden himself in various taped messages that he has released indicate he was a big believer in global warming.
Bin Laden accused this country of destroying the climate, destroying the planet.
And public transportation, that's green.
That's very safe.
That will protect.
Why would why would Obama blow up a train?
Osama, why would he blow up a train when, as a global warming supporter, a believer he understands it, trains help save the climate.
I mean, would your average liberal blow up a train?
Bill Ayers didn't blow up trains, he blew up Pentagon.
So I'm not sure.
I'm not sure I buy this business that Osama would blow up trains because it's a global warming official.
You know, a train, that's something sacred.
That make him a hypocritical mass murderer.
Blow up people on a train.
Saxby Chambless.
This is from the Atlanta urinal constipation.
Moments before he died, Osama bin Laden may have gotten a brief glimpse of what was headed his way.
A bullet whizzed by his head.
That's right, U.S. commandos missed with their first shot at the world's most wanted man as he poked his head out of a third door room in his.
Oh, it's a fortress now.
This, according to Senator Saxby Chambliss, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Bin Laden ducked back in.
The Navy SEALs quickly followed and finished the job with the now famous double tap.
The missed shot was a new detail in the emerging story of the 40 minute raid on the Abbadabad compound in Pakistan.
Chambler said, I hope they went in there with the idea of killing him and not capturing him.
We needed to take this guy out.
I and I know that that's what the executive order said.
The executive order?
The exec if folks, if that's true, this is newsworthy information because those kinds of executive orders are illegal.
Oh, yes, they are sturdily ever since uh uh Geronimo Ford.
The other thing you have to remember is that this was pitch dark.
When they got into that room with bin Laden, they already had to go through some other folks downstairs, two of which they killed, one had a squirt gun, and uh, and they were having to use explosives to blow doors open.
By the time they got to him, they didn't know what they would find.
So they blew the door open, they looked down the hallway and he stuck his head out of the room and it was in.
They saw him, he ducked back in, they fired a shot and missed him the first time and then went to the room.
They went into the room, and that's when they killed him.
This from Saxby Chambliss.
Now, he again says there was an executive order to take the guy out.
So now, if what he claims in this story is true, let's review here.
If what he claims is true, that means bin Laden not only heard the SEALs coming, but he saw them.
He heard them and saw them.
So why was he still unarmed?
He got that AK 47 within arm's length, but he never grabbed it, even though he heard him, even though he saw them.
So now uh Saxby Chambliss is one of the three senators who was shown a fake picture of the dead bin Laden and uh I think initially believed it.
One of the others was Scott Brown from uh from Reuters.
Reuters is not is not giving this up.
Maybe a better account than the one from Saxby Chambliss.
Only one of four principal targets shot dead by U.S. commandos in the raid which killed Osama bin Laden was involved in any hostile fire, according to a person familiar with the latest, most current U.S. government version of what happened.
The account of Monday's daring 40 minute raid has new descriptions of the event, including that Navy SEALs shot an occupant of the compound who they thought was armed, but apparently was not.
It confirms that bin Laden was not armed when he was shot dead, nor are there indications that he directly threatened his attackers, according to the first source and a second U.S. government source familiar with briefings on the raid.
So is the man they killed and now say had weapons nearby the one photograph lying on a water pistol?
I'm trying to figure out who the who this is.
And this detailed account here from Reuters, it's kind of peculiar insofar as it skips over the most controversial part, the actual killing of bin Laden.
It says what he did as the SEALs approached him is unclear.
Saxby Chambler says it's very clear.
Poked his head out, saw Bullet go by, missed it, ducked back in the room, seals followed him in, double tap, hello virgins.
But it's it's really it's hard to believe that if if bin Laden had any weapons nearby, he didn't pick one up.
That's something uh extremely curious to me.
At any rate, we still have lots to do.
I have to take a brief time out.
Al Qaeda's confirming Bin Laden's death, by the way.
Now, how do they know?
How do they know?
How does it how does how does Al Qaeda No, no, no?
How does Al Qaeda know?
How do how how in the world do they know?
Why why why would Al Qaeda come out and say that bin Laden is dead?
How could they confirm it?
Who does that help?
It helps the one.
It helps Obama.
Plus it gives them justification to attack us if they needed any.
They now the the latest from Al Qaeda is that uh this will result on a curse.
A result a uh a curse being placed on us here in America.
Okay, we're gonna get back to the phones.
I just have on topic here one more observation that I want to make.
We have news from the New York Times.
We got news number AP says, by the way, you know what?
There were two factions of Al Qaeda.
Bin Laden headed one and Eamon Al-Zawahiri headed up another.
Oh, really?
That's the first time we've heard of that.
Two warring factions inside Al Qaeda.
We thought bin Laden was numero uno, we thought Zawahiri was number two.
But from the New York Times, check this out.
After reviewing computer files and documents seized at the compound where bin Laden was killed, American intelligence analysts have concluded that bin Laden played a direct role for years in plotting terror attacks from his mansion getaway hideout in a Badabad, Pakistan.
U.S. officials said this yesterday.
My friends.
This is hilarious.
When Obama couldn't find Osama, even though he promised he would, we were told that Bin Laden was no longer of any consequence whatsoever.
This regime.
They cannot keep their lives straight.
They can't keep their stories straight.
We were told for the last three to four years, hey, you know, dialysis.
The guy is a shell of his former self.
He's not even operationally in control.
I mean, we've heard this over and over again from this bunch.
Now the New York Times, in an effort to build up the smallest guy in the situation room, Barack Obama, in an effort to build him up.
Guess what, folks?
Usama bin Laden has been at the helm this whole time.
Yes, bin Laden has to be amplified, has to be blown up, has to be made.
The big kahuna in order to make it look like Obama has really pulled off a major coup here.
I mean, how big a deal is it to kill somebody who's operationally kaput?
And that's what the regime said.
That was their excuse.
Eh, we're not really focusing on him that much.
It was only important when Bush couldn't get him.
Now that we can't get him, hell, he's not even a factor.
All of a sudden we get him.
He was running a whole show with no internet and no television and no phones.
He was running the whole show.
Had a big satellite dish out there.
Yes, right.
Now now that now that uh oh uh Obama has killed bin Laden, he was the most dangerous man in the world.
The man who shot Osama bin Laden.
Shot Osama bin Laden.
Here's Bob in Willowbrook, Illinois, as we uh return to the phones.
Great to have you on Open Line Friday.
Hi.
Thank you, Rush.
Classic John Ford Western Diddos.
Thank you very much, sir.
Speaking uh of uh clownish debate questions, do you remember the last time a debate moderator asked for a show of hands?
Other than last night?
Yeah.
No, I just know it happens all the time.
I can't remember the last time.
It was in 2008 before the Iowa caucuses when the editrix of the Des Moines Register uh was moderating uh debated the Republican hopeful and asked true uh yes or no, yes or no.
Uh do you believe in global warming?
And that was that for a show of hands on that?
Uh I I think uh she either that or or asked uh just uh each uh candidate one by one.
Yes or no?
Do you believe uh in global warming?
And one man had had the guts to say, I'm not taking that.
Uh I'm I'm not going to submit uh uh it's your uh Gestapo tactics.
Who was the editrix of the Des Moines Register at the time?
I don't remember her name.
Well, I remember one of the former editrixes of the Des Moines Register.
Uh name was Geneva Overholzer.
And she was uh she was best pals with Michael Gartner, who used to run the paper, and then he ran USA Today.
He ran NBC when they blew up the truck.
Um on on Datelines to show that the truck is unstable.
NBC blew it up.
He was running the show, and Geneva overholds her.
I remember I appeared on Nightline.
There was a nightline forum shortly uh during health care, Clinton Healthcare, where they were lying left and right.
And uh Ted Coppel asked me uh what I thought about Pusses.
Ted, I don't know when people pitching the program never tell you the truth about it.
I I really don't know what to believe.
She was on the panel that night.
And before we went to air, Coppel's doing his you know, I'm in my TV studio in New York, everybody out else is out in Iowa.
Carville's out there and uh Geneva overhauls her, and she's taking shots at me before we uh before we went on the air.
Friendly shot uh shots and so forth.
But I don't know if she's still there or if she's um you know in journalistic retirement now.
Uh she had a column of the New York Times for a while.
No, this really doesn't relate to anything.
I'm just a question of curiosity.
Who do you remember who it was that refused to answer the question?
Yeah, John um uh Fred uh Fred Thompson.
Fred Thompson refused to answer the question.
He's one guy who had the guts to stand up to her.
I'm not gonna fall for it.
Yeah.
Well, it's definitely get used to it because that same technique is gonna be employed.
It's all cliche and it's right out of their handbook.
It's open line Friday.
We stay, therefore, with the phones of Houston and Don.
Hello, sir.
Great to have you with us.
He stated that after a fire fight bin Laden was killed and his body was taken into custody after a fire fight.
Right.
That's very important word, by the way, after the fire.
Not during the fire.
Right, that's exactly very, very, very right, I'm proud of you.
All right.
Thank you, sir.
So what but what's the point?
Well, the point is that uh it should be followed up on just like bin Laden's daughter says that he was captured alive and then killed.
Right.
I mean, it it it goes with the idea that the mission was to kill bin Laden, even if he was captured alive.
There's no looking at the idea with to kill him.
Let me just tell you.
Let me just there was no way.
I'll repeat this over and over again.
Snurdly, do you think there's is i are we uh look, it's open line Friday is what people want to talk about.
That's the rule.
But are we getting into fatigue on this?
Not yet.
Okay, good.
Uh my empathy says we're not.
But um I just uh just wanted to check the uh there's no way they're gonna take this guy alive.
Ever, folks.
They were never I don't care if he was wearing a diaper, underwear, nude, they were never going to take him alive.
They were never gonna bring him back and subject him to their own sissy fied system of dealing with these people that they have set up.
They're never gonna give him an ACLU lawyer.
They're not gonna put him on trial.
They're not gonna do that.
No way, shape, manner form.
Well, the evidence clearly bears me out here.
I mean, they're going they're b uh uh back and forth on whether or not this a kill mission.
Don't doubt me out there.
This was a kill mission.
Who's next?
Uh Lee, big fork Montana.
Great to have you on the EIB network hive.
Hi, good morning.
Thank you, sir.
It's nice to talk with you.
Thank you.
I'm calling because this morning I was really excited.
I saw that in the paper that Donald Trump said he's not gonna drive the pace car in Indy because he has other races that he may be getting into.
I was really excited about that because we've been members of the Tea Party for a couple of years.
We are you know, BA degree, we're we're not intellectuals.
We don't go to the fancy bus when they're on the big circuit and all that kind of stuff.
We vote.
Wait a minute.
What's that got to do with Trump driving the pace car?
We vote.
That's what it has to do with it.
Well, I don't I don't understand.
Okay.
We are independent voters.
He is not going to drive the pace car because he has another race he's interested in running.
But that's not why he's not going to drive a pace car.
That's what it says in the paper.
Well, okay, my case closed.
Rest my case.
But what does it matter?
Do you like or not like Trump?
That's what I can't say.
I love Trump.
You do.
Yes, I do.
Okay, so I think that he's he talks straight, he talks square.
You know, Charles Crossing doesn't like him because he doesn't think he's presidential material.
I get it.
He wouldn't elect Truman.
I get it.
I get it.
I guess.
So when you hear him say he's got a more important race to run, then you're happy.
I am.
Gotcha.
Well, let me give you the rundown.
Let me tell you what really happened here.
The race officials of the 500 asked Trump to drive the pace car.
Trump says, Yeah, I'll drive the pace car.
And then two Democrats in Indianapolis started raising holy hell about Trump being a divisive figure and a racist in all this because of what he's done with Obama and the birth certificate and stuff, and said it was impugning the reputation of the Indianapolis 500.
We didn't need to make it partisan, but it you know, a local lawyer who is a Democrat fundraiser, operative hacker, what have you.
So they started raising holy hell.
Now I don't know if the race people went to Trump and said, Please bail us out and quit.
Because I don't know.
I I I do not know the Indy 500 people.
My guess is they want no part of controversy or anything to do with anything like this.
They thought they were hiring a reality TV star to drive the pace car, and then these two wacko lawyer Democrats in Indianapolis go nuts.
So I don't know if Trump just pulled out on his own to help them or if they actually asked him to.
But that, my friends, is the whole story.
Let's return to the Republican debate from last night.
Some other sound bites from the uh participants other than Herman Kane.
Here is Tim Pollenty.
The question that Juan Williams asked him.
When you served as governor in Minnesota, you named an education commissioner who equated the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution.
Do you equate the teaching of creationism with the teaching of evolution as the basis for what should be taught in our nation's screws?
And I ask that in the sense, do you personally equate a face faith-based theory with scientific inquiry?
Well, and the approach we took in Minnesota is to say that there should be room in the curriculum for study of intelligent design.
Didn't necessarily need to be in science class, but we didn't decide that at the state level.
We left that up to the local school districts and the communities and parents in that area.
I think that's a reasonable and appropriate approach.
I understand, Governor, but you didn't answer my question about what you believe about teaching creationism in the schools.
What do you believe, Governor?
I believe that should be left up to parents and local school districts and not to states or the federal government.
Now the poll, right.
Polenty people said they were surprised by the question.
From now on, don't be.
That's mild compared to what you're gonna get on this.
You really believe in God.
Do you really believe that Jesus rose from the dead?
Do you really believe it?
You're gonna get questions like that.
From these people.
Because by the time we get to the real debates, they're gonna be so paranoid Obama could lose this.
They're gonna be pulling out all the stops.
Don't doubt me here.
But Paleny refused to accept the premise.
So there was his answer there.
Let's move on to Santorum.
Now, remember, all day yesterday, the conventional wisdom in the drive-bys was that the Republicans just wouldn't dare take on Obama on foreign policy.
Now, oh no, no, not after.
Not after the Bin Laden mission.
And they had a story, Mitch Daniels, the governor of Indiana, saying, Well, uh, I'm not even ready to take him on in foreign police.
I don't think I'm really uh ready yet.
So the conventional wisdom wasn't the Republicans, they're gonna take him on.
Well, they did, every one of them last night, including Santorum, Brett Baer.
Senator Santorum, you said Monday that President Obama has made the country less safe, And his policies have made America's enemies, quote, less fearful and less respectful of us, close quote.
But when it comes to going after terrorists, for example, drone attacks in Pakistan have more than tripled under President Obama.
He sent 30,000 more U.S. troops into Afghanistan last year.
He just authorized, as we talked about, this mission to kill bin Laden.
How much more aggressive could he be?
If you look at what President Obama has done right in foreign policy, it has always been a continuation of the Bush policies.
He's gone right by keeping Gitmo open.
He's done right by finishing the job in Iraq.
The decision he made with Osama bin Laden was a tactical decision.
It wasn't a strategic decision.
The strategic decision was made already by President Bush to go after him.
What President Obama has done on his watch, the issues that have come up while he's been president, he's gotten it wrong strategically every single time.
Whether it's in Central America, Colombia, and Honduras, whether it's in the Middle East, with Egypt, with Syria, and most importantly, with Iran.
Sounds like Rick Santorum took it right to him.
Sounding like me.
This is what Mitch Daniels said that he's not ready to do yet.
Santorum did it.
Here's more Santorum, Shannon Bream later.
Senator Santorum, you're often characterized as the most socially conservative in the GOP field.
A man who may join you at some point in the primary, Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels says Republican candidates should quote, declare a truce, close quote, on social issues in the next election.
Is he right?
Are you willing to tone down your positions on abortion and homosexuality in an effort to reach more voters and help the GOP coalesce behind a more fiscally focused platform?
Anyone that would suggest that we call a truce on the moral issues doesn't understand what America is all about.
America.
America is a country that is based on this concept on the Declaration of Independence, that we are endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights.
Rights come from God, and the first of which is life, the second of which is liberty.
Those two concepts really transformed the world because it said that government was going to be limited, Allow people to be free and to pursue their own dreams to serve their God and to serve their family and community.
And if we have a respect for human life, because we're all created equal.
And so those founding concepts, what transformed the world in this United States of America was a belief in family, a belief in life, and the belief of dignity of every person.
If we abandon that, we have given up on America.
So Santorum is not for a truce on the social issues.
Now see, if you had watched this last night, I guarantee you, at the end of it, you would have been you'd have been up.
You would have been jazzed.
It was all like this.
I mean, there were a couple of uh well, it was mostly like this.
It really was.
More polente.
This is Brett Baer, Governor Pollenty, some on the left.
Uh now say President Obama's unbeatable in his reelection effort.
Why are those pundits on the left wrong?
What is his biggest vulnerability?
This morning they announced they had six dollar a gallon gas in Hawaii.
We have crushing levels of unemployment.
It's almost unbearable for so many of our fellow Americans.
We got a federal government that is out of control and spiraling towards financial insolvency.
And if you look at those facts and say President Obama is unbeatable, I just say respectfully, those polls are wrong.
He's got a temporary bump.
We can't restore America's promise unless we have a president who keeps his promises to America, and he stood before the American people and said he's going to cut the deficit in half in his first term.
He didn't keep that promise either.
Tim Polenti last night.
See, even Snerdley's uh smiling in there.
You're pleasantly surpr.
Right, I know.
Polenti is supposed to be a moderate.
Some fear he's a rhino.
Here he is taking it to Obama.
I'm telling you, they all did last night.
You'd have been jazzed if you'd have taken the time to watch it.
What are you watching, Dexter?
What was on it?
Lost reruns.
C-span.
This wasn't once.
Oh, that's right.
It was a Fox exclusive.
Open line Friday, Rush Limbaugh, the big voice on the right with talent on loan from God.
Frank Benson, Vermont.
Great to have you here, sir.
Hello.
Thank you for having me, Rush.
And uh I want to thank Mr. Snurley, too.
Um my question is uh our statement is that.
Are you there?
Yeah.
Oh good.
My say my uh my statement is is that uh I why I believe they picked uh uh Santorum as the um uh the best candidate last night out of that debate was because he's uh in my estimation is online democra uh Republican,
excuse me, and uh he plays the game like the because he's been uh noted in another uh question and answer period that he uh did have earmarks all along and shared earmarks with Democrats, and uh that they they played the game so he get his earmarks passed.
Uh he he'll he'll help them pass their earmarks.
And uh I really think Harmon Kane did a real good job there, and in my estimation right now, so I'm leaning towards Herman Cain rather than somebody who's been there and uh is old line type where they do play those games.
Right.
Right.
Well very interesting.
Somebody where they don't you in fact you like people that don't play the games, is that what you're saying?
Exactly.
Exactly.
I think we need um uh I'm a Vermont Tea Party member, and we you know, we're our stand is that we want people that are gonna do it now, not later.
Um Damn straight.
And and why in the world are we gonna wait till 2016?
What's the point of waiting till 2016?
Right, Frank.
There is no we should do it now.
That's right.
Exactly right.
All right, it's Frank in Vermont.
Frank, thanks, uh Vencer, thanks very much for Lee uh for the call.
This is uh Jim in Las Vegas.
Uh great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Uh Dodo's from Las Vegas, uh Rush.
Dildos?
Well, it is Las Vegas.
Uh two things.
How is it possible for us?
We had the DNA proof in just one day.
I mean, I see high profile cases uh uh uh involving the government where we couldn't get results within uh minimum of seven days.
Well, you can't you can't get total uh uh DNA proof in one day, but from what I understand, you can link you you you can link somebody to a family.
You you can link and leave you can link somebody to a father.
Uh but you can't prove it somebody is specifically so you can say you can prove it somebody came from a mother and father, from what I understand very quickly, but identifying a particular person you can't do in one day.
But that's that's right.
That's just another element of this.
Look at the another element.
When when Obama went out there on the first Sunday night, he said the raid happened a week ago.
Or the media did.
The media did happen a week ago, then Obama said happened that night.
This has been cockeyed from the get-go.
What exciting hour to go on open line Friday, hosted by me uh, L. Rushbow, and we will look into the unemployment numbers.
And the uh accompanying press coverage of the unemployment story.
Plus uh Lisa, what else?
We got lots of other stuff to do too.
Uh here as Open Line Friday rolls right on L. Rushbaugh and the excellence in broadcasting network.
Don't go anywhere.
▲
Export Selection