All Episodes
Previous Next
April 1, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:53
April 1, 2011, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, America's Anchorman is away, and this is your undocumented anchorman.
No supporting paperwork whatsoever.
Great to be with you.
Rush returns live Monday for another week of excellence in broadcasting for the full five days.
But don't forget, you can go to rushlimbore.com 24-7, and it's like he's never gone away.
You get all kinds of stuff there.
There's audio, there's print transcripts, you can download the app for your mobile device, rushlimbore.com, all the great stuff.
You need not be discompobulated by sinister foreign guest hosts.
It's like he's never gone away.
It is the end of the week, and you know what that means.
Live from New York City, it's open lives Friday.
Hey, hey, hey, hey, wait a minute.
Last hour we were live from sunny South Florida.
What's happened?
Who took away the palm trees?
Great to be with you.
1-800-282-2882.
We're talking about the economy.
We are talking about Libya.
You know, it's fascinating.
The Pentagon is now pulling U.S. attack planes out of Libya.
I think they're going back to Italy, and they're going to leave it to, they're going to leave most of the active missions to the Royal Air Force and the French Air Force and a couple of others.
I think the actual, I think the Belgians actually took out some Libyan jet yesterday, which must be the first, I can't remember the last time the Belgian Air Force actually took out some other guy's plane, but apparently they did yesterday.
So it looks as if the US under Obama is actually quite serious about this business of taking a back seat in the Libyan conflict.
And it will be interesting to know whether Gaddafi, when he's making his calculations, thinks that's a good thing or a bad thing.
It's an old piece of advice.
Who was it?
Was it Hannibal or Scipio?
But one of those guys way back when, Scipio Africanus, I think, who said that you should always offer an enemy an escape route.
In this case, we've ruled out an escape route.
David Cameron, the British prime minister, said we're going to put Gaddafi on trial.
So what that basically means is that Gaddafi is not going to take any deal to settle down in some nice villa on the coast somewhere and agree to go into exile because he's going to be thinking these guys are going to stiff me and have me up on genocide charges at the International Criminal Court or whatever.
So we've incentivized his staying in Libya right to the bitter end and killing as many people as possible.
But we'll see what calculations he draws by this decision by the Pentagon to pull US planes out of active missions and basically send them back to Italy.
A bit of unfinished business from the last hour.
I was saying there was nothing caring and compassionate about guys like Harry Reid and Barney Frank and Chuck Schumer being caring and compassionate by spending money yet to be earned by children yet to be born.
And Greg from Blair, Nebraska, which he says is just 25 miles north of the location of stuffed trigger.
You remember Roy Rogers' horse?
We were talking about him yesterday.
He's stuffed and he used to be in Roy Rogers' living room when he died.
He was stuffed and mounted, or stuffed and not mounted, I guess in this case.
And he's apparently 25 miles from Blair, Nebraska.
That's his come and whereabouts, the stuffed trigger.
But anyway, Greg says you mentioned spending money yet to be earned by people yet to be born.
I would call that the ultimate in taxation without representation, wouldn't you?
Yes, I think that's a good way of putting it.
It negates the American Revolution.
The American Revolution was about taxation without representation.
When you're spending money by people and presuming that those in our kindergarten and first grade will pay it back, or at the rate we're spending, that the children of those currently in American kindergartens will pay it back.
You are imposing on them taxation without representation.
The people we're sticking with the tap, Chuck Schumer, the extremist, Chuck the extremist, Schumer the extremist, is imposing on unborn generations of Americans taxation without representation.
Chuck Schumer is the negation of the American Revolution.
We're not even talking about all governments at one time or another find themselves having to borrow a little bit here and a little bit there.
But borrowing on this scale, borrowing a $1.7 trillion deficit on an annual budget, that is a negation of the American Revolution because you are saying to Americans born in 2011, you will be living with taxation without representation.
You didn't get to vote on this stuff, but you're going to be taxed to pay for it.
And that is contemptible.
That is contemptible.
And Greg is absolutely right when he says that is the ultimate in taxation without representation.
One of the problems here is, and one of the reasons why we need to move fast on this stuff is because eventually you reach a tipping point where there are so many people who are invested in either in providing the government workforce or being dependent on the government workforce that the people in between being squeezed by both sides.
There's not enough of them.
There's not enough of the productive class left to outvote the massive numbers of government workers and dependents.
You take a state like California, it's got 2.4 million government workers.
2.4 million government workers.
That's incredible.
I mean, that's like over half the population of New Zealand.
You know, this is actually the size of a government workforce, the size of the entire population of a developed country.
2.4 million government workers.
You take the people who are dependent on government workers, who are on welfare, and you make that the basic vote for big government.
And that's the advantage that the Democratic Party starts with in California.
So in every election, you take the 2.4 million workers.
Right there, that's 2.4 million votes for the Democratic Party, for the party of government that the Republicans have to try and catch up with.
And you add to that, then you add to that the dependency class, the welfare class.
And that's millions more that the Republican Party has to start and try to catch up with.
And eventually it's not possible to catch up.
And I want to be clear what we're talking about here, by the way, because I had an email from somebody who said that, you know, you've been demonizing government workers.
Well, my family are government workers.
My father's a veteran, and I'm in the Navy, and my sister is in the Army or whatever.
That's not the government workers we're talking about.
Providing for the defense of the nation is a legitimate part of government.
Providing cowboy poetry festival grant administrators is not a legitimate role of the federal government.
And we're not talking, so we're not talking here about soldiers and sailors and airmen.
We're talking about the vast number of bureaucrats in the Bureau of Compliance, in the Bureau of Cowboy Poetry Compliance.
We're talking about the vast number of regulatory agencies that are sucking the life out of the American economy.
And when we get rid of those, then we can start talking about the number of active sailors we have or the number of active airmen we have.
But that's not the kind of government worker we're talking about.
We're talking about the government micro-regulation of every area of endeavor.
We're talking in the state of California with its 2.4 million government workers.
We're talking about people like the bureaucrat, the bureaucrat who went into the hardware store in whatever county it was and told the guy whose family had been putting out complimentary coffee and donuts for generations on the counter that it is against the law in California to offer free coffee and donuts to your customers.
You've got to have a regulated food preparation kitchen or you've got to have a food preparation service.
You've got to have stainless steel sinks.
You've got to have licenses and permits.
It's illegal.
It's illegal in whatever county this is in California for a hardware store to offer complimentary free coffee and donuts to its customers, even when they've been doing it for generations.
This is Ventura County, I believe.
Ventura County in does that sound right?
That doesn't sound right.
Is there a county called Ventura County?
That can't be right.
Is there in California?
Ventura County.
Offering free hardware services in its hardware store, free coffee.
And the manager of community services for the Ventura County Environmental Health Division, Elizabeth Huff, says that you can no longer do this.
That's what we're talking about.
Commissar Huff.
America doesn't need Commissar Huffs.
The Republic will survive if people are offering free coffee in hardware stores.
And at a certain point, you reach the level where this is unbalancing the productive class.
There are so many people in the government class, so many people in the dependent class, the productive class in between get squeezed.
And you don't want to leave it too late to push back on this stuff.
And we are leaving it awfully late in states like California.
It's virtually impossible.
It would be impossible now for a small government party, a genuine small government party, to get elected in the state of California.
And that is why it is important to take action.
And that is why, by the way, guys like Barack Obama want to divert even more members of the productive class into government.
The state and local workforce has expanded six times faster than the general population since 1950.
And it's still not enough for these guys.
They still want more regulators, more bureaucrats, more agencies of this, more departments of that, more bureaus of compliance, micro-regulating every aspect of your life.
This is this.
We are getting near the last chance.
We are in the 11th hour.
If we do not roll this stuff back in the next two to four years, it will be too late.
1-800-282-2882.
Mark Steid in for Rush Open Line Friday.
We were talking about Al-Qaeda denouncing Hillary Clinton as the old lady of Malice.
And I did say there would be a federal cowboy poetry grant in it for limericks on the old lady of malice.
And Scaramouche, who is a blogger, sends me this one, which I liked.
I'll tell you why I liked it afterwards.
There was an old lady of malice who wanted to bomb a dude's palace.
Now, the Arab League moans she's the one with the stones, while Obama needs lots of sialis.
And I Apart from the fact that I like the idea of Obama needing, Obama needing geopolitical sialis, I hadn't riffling through the ribing dictionary in my head, as many people did, they came up with Old Lady Amalis, Palace, Chalice, and Phallas.
But this is the first one to actually rhyme it with Cialis.
There was an Old Lady Amalis who wanted to bomb a dude's palace.
Now, the Arab League moans, she's the one with the stones, while Obama needs lots of sialis.
Let's go to Patrick in Rockford, Illinois.
Patrick, you're live on the Rush Limbaugh Show.
A pleasure to speak to you, sir.
Of all the many marks that guest host, you have to be my favorite without question.
A man among marks.
A marked man.
A marked man.
Great to have you with us.
How's the economy treating you in Rockford, Illinois?
You're heading for failed state status almost as fast as Libya, I think, aren't you?
Yes, we're enjoying the train ride right down the tubes.
It's wonderful.
Absolutely.
Great.
Well, I remember the budget shutdowns in 1981 and 1984.
And as usual, the polls, instead of cutting privileges like apparently cowboy poetry, we cut the Weather Bureau and we cut meat inspection and we cut vital services in an attempt to get the public to call their legislators and urge them to cough up more money and move on with the whole circus.
Right.
And I remember distinctly when the Weather Bureau thing that locally here, there was a bad storm that came through in 1984 and some people came very close to having some real problems and they kind of papered it over.
And in fact, when you would call the Bureau, there would be a guy at recording who would say, you know, such and such and so-and-so.
And if there's a bad storm, we will try to get in and do this and do that.
And, you know, I typically looked at the sky and thought, okay, it's bad.
I think I better take cover.
But I guess my point is people need to realize what's coming here.
But you know, eventually there aren't going to be any more of those services.
Because if you look at this, if you look at this model, that nearly half of the $2.2 trillion cost of state and local government is the $1 trillion a year tab for the pay and benefits of state and local workers.
That's Stephen Moore in the Wall Street Journal today.
So if you were to ask, if you were to ask these guys to cut a trillion dollars out of the budget, which trillion dollars are they going to cut, the services or the employee pay and benefits?
And eventually, I think you will have situations where there's the Bureau of this and the Department of that, including core services like policing, for example, where you still have basically the same number of employees on the same rates of pay being hired by their agencies.
But to save costs, they're not actually getting into their cars and driving around town to do any actual policing.
In other words, you will get less and less service while essentially the salaries, the total remuneration and compensation packages stay the same.
So you'll be calling not just the Weather Bureau, but all kinds of bureaus and getting that recorded message.
Correct.
That's the way it's going to be, simply because once, you know, we see this in Wisconsin.
A court has ruled that, a court has essentially ruled that it's illegal to pass a law.
If I understand, I'm not an expert in Wisconsin law, but if I understand this judge correctly, the judges ruled that it's illegal to pass a law.
What they're actually saying there is that the government class will do whatever is necessary to protect its privileges.
And in the end, it won't matter whether it's the Department of Weather or the Department of Cowboy Poetry, because neither of them will actually be doing anything.
They will essentially exist to pay their current workers and their retirees, but they will not be performing any actual services that you could recognize, Patrick.
That is basically the world we're heading in on that.
Yes.
And I remember the House Bank and the House Post Office.
Right.
And the free haircuts and the limo rides and on and on and on.
The elites, they have no idea what we're headed for.
No, no, and that idea as well, which I think absolutely has no place in a republic of supposed citizen legislators, that the people who make the laws are not bound by the laws.
The people who make the laws are exempt from the laws.
And the idea that you will have – and that is the model to think of as the differences between the government class and the productive class grow ever wider.
The government class will develop a kind of gated community mentality in their approach to governing.
They will want to impose things on you that they don't want to be bound by.
And then their priority will be how to ensure that there's a big enough gate to stop you from getting at them.
We saw what that looks like on the streets of Wisconsin, that when the citizens attempt to restrain the government class, the government class is prepared to do what is necessary to protect its privileges.
It's not going to be pretty a lot of this stuff.
And there's not going to be a lot of difference, as we saw between what's happening in Madison and what's happening in the Greek riots and the riots in London last weekend.
The incoherence, I mean, if you think it's bad between the Shia and the Sunni in Bahrain, or you think it's bad between the Kurds and the Arabs in northern Iraq, what is going to happen here between the government class and the beleaguered band of taxpayers who pay for them is going to be far worse, Patrick.
Yes, sir.
Yep, yep.
My ancestors escaped Ireland five generations ago just because of this.
Right.
Well, if Ireland weren't also going belly up, you would be back on the ship there.
But I had an email from, I think it's the Supreme Islamic Council of Ireland who are saying that the solution to Ireland's economic woes is to have Islamic law imposed on Ireland.
So I don't want to get into the sectarian divide and know whether your family were Protestant or Catholic, but the big sectarian divide in the Ireland of the 21st century is going to be Shia versus Sunni.
So that's, funnily enough, that's the way it goes pretty much anywhere on the planet these days.
Patrick in Walkford, Illinois, thank you for your call.
Yeah, this stuff is going to get crazy because it won't be the benefits.
In other words, the way to impose pain on the people who vote to cut spending is to say, we're not going to cut the employee benefits, we're not going to cut the health care, we're not going to cut the salaries, we're not going to cut the early retirement age, we're going to cut the services, and we're going to stick it to the citizenry.
There's going to be lots more of that in the years ahead.
Yes, Rush returns live Monday for another week of excellence in broadcasting, but in the meantime, substitute host-level excellence in broadcasting, I'm afraid.
I think we are still in full compliance with the Bureau of Regulatory Compliance for Excellence in Broadcasting.
I hope we are.
Just barely.
We just barely scraped through it.
But we are just about in compliance.
I want to get to this before we wrap up today because I laugh my head off at this.
This is from the Los Angeles Times.
Why should writers work for no pay?
And this is in reference to the Huffington Post, founded by Arianna Huffington.
And Arianna, God bless her, sold it to AOL in February, her site, for $315 million.
That's a third of a billion dollars.
Arianna sells her website to a third of a billion dollars.
Now, most of the content on this website, she doesn't pay for.
Most of the website is written for free by people who, when they joined up, when they signed up, were thinking, well, this is just some nice little community kibbutz-like website, and I'm willing and happy to be able to write for free just to get my voice out.
And then it turns out the little online community website is worth a third of a billion dollars, and Ariana Huffington is getting it all.
And these writers, by the way, is this a left-wing website?
So these are the ones who spend their whole time writing and denouncing Governor Walker in Wisconsin for wanting to roll back public sector pay, who claim that Governor Walker is in the hands of these sinister Koch brothers, these new robber barons who are wanting to crush the wages of American workers, who go on all the time about greedy Wall Street fat cats.
You're working for free for a woman who has just made a third of a billion dollars by selling what you write to AOL.
You know, you're not even doing it for sweatshop labor.
You know, there's no sweatshop, a sweatshop over on the other side of the world will at least be giving you six cents an hour.
You're not even getting six cents an hour for that.
And now they've finally woken up, these guys, according to this op-ed in the Los Angeles Times.
And they're figuring out, well, you know, maybe we should do something about it.
Maybe we should form an internet contributors union or whatever, and get collective bargaining.
No, no, Ariana, Ariana and her crowd are in favor of collective bargaining for Scott Walker and for the public sector workforce.
But Arianna isn't in favor of collective bargaining for you guys.
You guys write for free.
You write for free for years and years and years on end.
And then she sells it for a third of a billion dollars, for a third of a billion dollars.
And that is the business model that she imposes.
You know, the fascinating thing about big-time liberals is that you should always look not at what they say, but at what they do.
It's the same with Jamie Gorellik, this woman who, no matter how disastrous she is, always seems to bounce from one lucrative private sector job to one prominent government job, to one lucrative private sector job to one prominent government job.
You look at what liberals do, not at what they say.
This woman made a third of a billion dollars by paying idealistic left-wing writers to debitize guys like Governor Walker for wanting to cut the wages of government workers in Wisconsin.
She made a third of a billion dollars and you made zero, not even sweatshop labor.
Let's go to Bill in Bossier, Louisiana.
Bill, you're live on the Rush Limbo show.
Great to have you with us.
How are you doing, Mark?
I always enjoy when you're on the show.
Back towards the end of the last hour, you talked about the Missouri State Senator that refused the federal money.
Right.
And I was just telling your call screener earlier that I had a call from the Social Security Administration.
My ex-wife had done on disability.
Right.
And I thought, well, not a big deal to me.
I'm, you know, we're not married anymore.
So she said, well, no, your son qualifies for it.
Well, I had custody of him, and I told her, I said, well, that's nice, but I don't really need the money.
And she said, well, it's free money.
And so that wasn't bad enough.
That was, you know, probably back around January.
Well, I just kind of, you know, I didn't think any more of it.
She called me back about a week ago and kind of in a disgusted voice and well, you haven't went and signed up to sign him up yet.
And I'm thinking, well, I told you I wasn't.
I didn't need, you know, I don't, sure, everybody needs a little extra money, but that's not my money.
And she couldn't understand that.
Right, right, right.
You know, I mean, thinking, it's not your money.
It's really not the government's money.
It's our money.
In fact, it's not even our money.
It's money borrowed from some foreign democracy.
But she could not get that to her head that I was refusing free cash from the government.
No.
No, no.
And you know, Bill, you're very old-fashioned like that.
Because somebody, there are large numbers of people.
There are tens of millions of people across this country who thinks that there is such a thing as free government money.
What's that bit that Rush always plays about the people going up to get the stimulus money?
And he plays that clip of the ladies talking, and the interviewer is asking them where they come from and where the money comes from.
And the lady says, oh, I don't know.
I guess it comes from Obama's stash.
There are tens of millions of people who think that either Obama's got it in his stash, that it's in the basement of the White House somewhere, and they're just passing this money out, or that, you know, somehow it's found in a trunk of Zanzibari doubloons that washes up off the coast of Somalia or whatever, that there is somehow some big pile of government money that exists.
Government doesn't have any money except what it gets from Bill in Bossia, Louisiana, and the few other people stupid enough to still be doing working and making net contributions to this society.
And what's important is when you've actually spent all the money that Bill in Bossia can give to the government, you then have to move on to taxing Bill's children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren, yea, unto the generations.
And in the meantime, while you're waiting for them to be born and get out of the maternity ward and get into school and get through school and get through the six-year college and eventually emerge from school at 28 or 29, start contributing to society.
In the meantime, you've got to borrow it, as Bill said, from hostile foreign powers who at the moment are buying our debt at low rates of interest, 1% interest.
And at the 1% interest, we're going to be paying somewhere between 16 and 20% of federal revenues in debt interest.
If it goes up to what it's been historically in the last 10, 15 years to around 4, 5%, we are in the all-time biggest hole.
There is no money.
Not only is there no free money, there's no non-free money.
We've spent all the non-free money there is.
The only money that there is now is money that we borrow from foreigners and that we pay back with money that we have yet to earn.
And at the scale we're doing it, we can never earn that money back, Bill.
That's the trouble.
You gave a very principled answer, and this government bureaucrat said, I don't care what your answer is.
You should still take the money anyway.
That's basically it, isn't it, Bill?
And well, and you know, the thing is, I think most people need to remember, I'm in my early 40s, but I can remember back in the Soviet Union when there were people standing outside hundreds of long yards long lines waiting to just get a loaf of bread and roll the toilet paper for that week.
You keep printing money, you keep carrying it down the Soviet socialistic Marxist, whatever you want to call this government we're trying to establish now.
That's going to be us in the next few years.
No, no, no, Bill.
People forget that.
You know, the Soviet supermarket where every checkout line is for five items or less.
Those were the grand old days.
They could well be coming here sooner than you think.
Thank you for your call.
1-800-282-2882.
Markstein in for Rush.
Mark Stein for Rush on the EIB network.
Let's go to Donna in Middletown, Maryland.
Middletown, Maryland.
That sounds just the kind of town that you'd a centrist, independent, weigh both options and then take part in a CNN panel on the eve of election night saying you're still not quite ready to make up your mind kind of town.
That's Middletown, Maryland.
Sounds like the kind of town a nice centrist independent photo would live.
We're going to go to Donna.
Donna, you don't fall into that category, do you?
No, I'm a conservative.
Woo!
Go.
You're an extremist.
There's many of us out here.
You're an extremist in Middletown.
That's what we want.
Outside of D.C., yeah.
Right, right, right.
Just right of Middletown.
Yeah, I've got a question for you, Mr. Mark.
Okay, you go for it.
And my question is this.
In lieu of George Soros and all the damage he's trying to do to our financial system here and abroad, and all the lefty lunatics that are going along with the charade and all the radical Islamists that are tied together along with people in our own government.
Who do you see, and I think there's a hunger for this in this country, as the next stand-up person on the conservative side who rein this thing in and beat them at their own game, if that's possible?
Well, let me just say this, Donna, let me come at that at a slightly sideways thing.
You know, the party that is looking for a messianic figure is the Democratic Party.
The Democratic Party decided that Obama, remember the guy, who is it, the guy at Newsweek who said he's kind of bigger than God.
He bestrides the planet like a colossus.
He has come down from Mount Olympus, this mighty figure.
Do you remember Michael Beschloss, the supposedly distinguished presidential historian, supposedly distinguished presidential historian, who said that Obama is probably the smartest guy ever to become president?
In other words, they invested everything in this messianic leader.
Do you remember, who was it, the film director, who said that basically they would change the way we now dated things.
Instead of BC and AD, it was going to be BO before Obama and AO for after Obama or whatever.
They're the ones who invested in the messianic leader who can do no wrong.
Conservatism, by its definition, doesn't want a messianic figure.
You know, we're the guys who elect people like Calvin Coolidge.
Calvin Coolidge is the embodiment of the citizen president who looks on himself as one of us performing a very limited job.
And so you don't want to invest everything in the idea of the supreme leader because he will always disappoint you.
The great news, you know, I love the way that the left-wing media in this country mocked the Tea Party movement because they said, at first they said it was astroturf, you know, it was fake grassroots.
And then when it turned out it was real grassroots, then they began mocking the Tea Party for not having pre-printed logos and slogans and placards and for not having designated leaders.
And in fact, being a leaderless, diffused, genuine grassroots movement, it produced an incredible election result in 2010.
The most impressive election result in three quarters of a century.
And it did that without any messianic leader, without any messianic leader.
Now, in 2012, we're going to have to name one person because you're going to have a lot of senators, you're going to have a lot of congressmen, you can have a lot of governors, but you only have one presidential candidate.
And the thing about it is all these guys always turn out to have flaws.
I like Chris Christie when he comes along.
I love the way he handles himself.
I think he's great, but he's lousy on the Second Amendment and all kinds of things.
You know, that's just the nature of the business.
I love Michelle Buckman.
Michelle Buckman posed with my book, which she's photographed with my book.
It was a Congress Reads Day, and you're supposed to pick Thomas the Tank Engine or something that the little kids, the grade schoolers, would like.
And she picked America Alone.
She stood there, photographed with my book, and all the Democrats in Minnesota said, this is perfect proof of how she's flown the coupe.
She's out of here.
She's gone.
She's off the charts.
I love Michelle Bachman.
She made a terrible mistake when she came to conquered New Hampshire because she thought she was in conquered Massachusetts.
You know, nobody, nobody is perfect.
Nobody is perfect.
And what is we are going to, we don't want to just pick the guy the media imposes on us.
We want to listen to the ones that the media are most frantic to demonize.
That's often a great way to look at it.
Who are the Democrats and the media scared of?
Because in their frenzy to pile on somebody, they're often telling you something very useful.
They're telling you who they're worried about.
In the end, they weren't worried about John McCain.
They're not worried about Bob Dole because they think they're decent old sticks who know how to give a great concession speech.
What is important here is to recognize that you need somebody at the apex of the movement, but that is all they are.
They're not Moses.
They're not going to lead you into the promised land.
They're not going to lead you out of the wilderness.
Those days ended in 1776.
George III was a beneficent monarch and he couldn't understand why his colonial subjects didn't appreciate all the good he was doing for them.
And the American colonists said, we don't need a beneficent monarch.
We are a self-governing republic and we hire a guy who works for us.
And the critical thing here, Donna, is to learn the lessons of the last two years with diffused Tea Party, genuine grassroots mobilization liberty.
Pick the candidate who best exemplifies that, but don't invest in him the messianic qualities that the Democrats invested in Barack Obama because they just made themselves look like the biggest bunch of patsys and saps and rubees on the planet.
Now he's got more wars going for him than George W. Bush.
They fell for it.
They fell for that.
They're the saps.
They're the rubees.
We're not like that, Donna.
This is a citizens' republic.
You look for the guy who best represents the movement of the last two years, but he's not a messianic figure.
Thanks for your call.
1-800-282-2882.
Yeah, happy trails to you.
It's the last roundup here at the Rush Limbo here at the Rush Limbush.
Oh, before I forget, by the way, a listener said me a great thing.
He said, is the number one federally funded cowboy poet in the United States given the title of poet Lariat?
I loved it.
I loved it.
But that's it.
That's the end.
We reached the end of the trail.
This is Mark Stein, your gnarled old Wrangler.
Well, okay, gnarled old metrosexual federally subsidized wrangler saying it's time to hit the trail.
There's a clump of sagebrush that's a beckoning me in the sunset, and it's time for me to ride out there and lope along on my faithful old paint.
He's a paint who's an old paint who's looking to retire and live on 80% federal benefits and federally funded health care.
Rush will return live on Monday.
Yippie Kay!
▲
Export Selection