All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 8, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:49
February 8, 2011, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Holy cow, folks, who would have thought that you could make as much money setting up a liberal wet job website as you could by marrying and divorcing a rich guy?
Talking about Zaza Huffington here.
$315 million for the Huffing and Puffington Post.
And AOL bought it.
I'll tell you what this is.
I'll tell you exactly what this is.
The left will spend anything to save itself from reality.
And the reality is that nobody cares.
The reality is it's in big trouble.
So let's buy it.
Let's just put $315 million behind it.
And let's make it look like it's something that's big and something that's happening.
Meanwhile, the site is moderating toward the center.
It's not even trying to aim at the fringe leftist base anymore because there isn't a whole lot of money there.
Anyway, great to have you here, folks.
El Rushball, we are back.
Why didn't AOL, why don't they just go out and buy the Democrat Party and cut out the middleman?
Who needs the website?
And now, Zaza, what's she going to say?
$18 to $20 million a year is what she's going to be paid for this, which will buy a lot of stuff from Chanel.
A lot of pamper treatments at the spas, wherever she gets them done.
So I guess it's a good deal.
Great to have you here, folks.
Telephone number 800-282-2882, the email address, LRushball at EIBNet.com from the Los Angeles Times, U.S. eases off of call for swift Egypt reform.
Now, there's a companion story to this in the UK Independent.
Can Egypt's revolution stay the distance?
Increasing signs of normality in parts of Cairo belie a continuing stalemate.
After 30 unbroken years as president of Egypt, it seemed as if Hosni Mubarak's charmed career was finally coming to an end, but he came up with a brilliant idea right out of the Obama playbook.
He gave all federal employees in Egypt, all government employees, a 15% pay increase.
And about one-third of the crowd went home.
Cairo's famous traffic jams were back.
Businesses, shops, banks were open across the capital.
Obama spoke of the progress the Egyptian government was making towards reform.
And though still in tens of thousands, the numbers at Tahiri-Riri Square were probably down on the previous day.
I mean, there's still a lot out there, tens of thousands, but it doesn't appear.
I mean, the headline, can Egypt's revolution stay the distance?
Do they have the staying power?
And you know what?
They have now said they're making it look, I guess, going to be a permanent tent city.
They're going to have showers for those that want them.
Taking a shower can be a sign of weakness within certain elements of this movement.
They're even going to have smoking and non-smoking sections for the protest.
Kid you not.
If you want to smoke, there's a section for you over here in the protest of Mubarak.
If you don't smoke, there's a section for you over there.
I don't know.
Bloomberg's involved in it.
I don't know.
We'll know if Michelle Maybell's involved, if we start hearing about all the healthy food they're eating over there, the couscous and the fried goat's eyes or whatever else she deems to be appropriate.
By the way, Keith Oberdork, who left MSNBC, is going to Al Gore's cable channel, Current TV.
Yeah, it's still on.
And I just have one piece of advice for the people at Fox.
Not ever talk about what goes on over there and nobody will ever hear about it.
And if Olbermood wouldn't be anything today if they hadn't decided to start picking fights with those people over there, that network wouldn't have half the audience it's got as it does now.
Anyway, the Chinese opera format was not working at current TV.
The global warming stuff just hadn't caught hold.
So now they're all in with Olberdork as the political director and prime time talent at Al Gore's cable channel.
That's trust me, ladies and gentlemen, as a highly trained broadcast specialist.
This is a move that under normal circumstances you wouldn't publicize and you would frankly hope nobody ever heard about.
But the words out back to the LA Times here, U.S. ease's off call for swift Egypt reform.
The regime, that's the Obama regime, feels the approach is needed to reassure Middle East allies of U.S. loyalty.
But gradual reform isn't going to satisfy the protest movement in Cairo.
There's really a lot of questions that they have over there.
They don't know if the replacement for Mubarak that everybody has in mind is going to be about democracy that they called for.
It's still unclear what this is really all about.
I look at it and I see the divisions in this country over what's going on and who's saying what about it.
And with something called the Muslim Brotherhood involved in this, supposedly the brothers here are having trouble getting a foothold on this thing.
We shall see.
Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, said that statements like this culture of democracy statement being in place for democracy to flourish, statements like that are not going to be met with any agreement by the people of Egypt because they don't address the very legitimate grievances that we've seen expressed as a result of these protests.
On Monday, a group of Middle East experts wrote Obama expressing fears the White House might acquiesce to an inadequate and possibly fraudulent transition process in Egypt.
Of course they would.
Anything to make it look like there's movement over there so that the regime can claim credit for it as having had the real power and influence to make it all happen.
And then, ladies and gentlemen, days are running together here.
Oh, before we get to that, let me stay on topic.
This is from the Fort Worth, Dallas area, CBS Eyeball News.
Some students at Mansfield ISD's schools could soon be learning Arabic as a required language.
The Scruel District wants students at select schools to take Arabic languages and culture classes as part of a federally funded grant.
The Foreign Language Assistance Program, otherwise known as FLAP.
The grant was awarded to Mansfield ISD last summer by the U.S. Department of Education, i.e. the regime.
As part of the five-year, $1.3 million, but that's all we can do.
Part of the five-year, $1.3 million grant, Arabic classes would be mandatory at Cross Timbers Intermediate Schruel and Kenneth Davis Elementary Schruel.
The program would also be optional for students at T.A. Howard Middle Schruel and Summit Hascruel.
Parents at Cross Timbers say they were caught off guard by the program, were surprised that the district only told them about it in a meeting Monday night between parents and the superintendent.
The Department of Education, the regime, in other words, has identified Arabic as a language of the future.
But parent Joseph Balson was frustrated.
Why are we just now finding out about it?
He said, it's them, the school district, applying for the grant, getting it approved, and them now saying they'll go back and change it only when they were caught trying to implement this plan without parents knowing about it.
Interesting, yeah, they're trying to implement the plan without the parents knowing about it.
Mansfield ISD says in addition to language, the grant provides culture, government, art, traditions, and history, Arabic, as part of the curriculum.
Yeah, it's a well-rounded education that we're going for here.
Tricia Savage says, I think it's a great opportunity to open doors.
We need to think globally and act locally.
Some parents had concerns over religion.
The school doesn't teach Christianity, so I don't want them teaching Islam, said parent Baron Kane.
During Monday's meeting, Morrison stressed the curriculum would not be about religion, but about Arabic language and culture, similar to the Spanish curriculum already in place in the districts.
What foreign languages are taught at elementary schools?
Does anybody know?
We're talking in some cases here.
If I read this right, elementary school.
Yeah.
Cross Timbers Intermediate School and Kenneth Davis Elementary School.
What foreign languages are taught in elementary school?
Some places, Spanish and French are taught in elementary school.
It's voluntary.
Voluntarily.
Is English taught in elementary school?
Well, I'm just asking.
Been a long time since I've been in elementary school, and I frankly didn't retain much.
And it was many, many moons ago, so whatever I went through is clearly not relevant here.
Well, sternly, I don't know.
The story doesn't say anything about the girls having to wear burqas.
It didn't go that far.
I just, it's a cultural thing here.
So the hijab, the hijab, what I, I don't, I'm just telling you what the story says from CBS Eyeball News in Dallas.
They're going to start teaching Arabic in elementary school and culture because it's a language of the future.
By the way, Mrs. No, no, no.
No, no, no.
No, they're paying Oberman in carbon credits.
They don't have any money to pay.
Everybody's asking me how much we are back.
Rush Litball, brand new week, broadcast excellence.
Happy to have you on the EIB network.
Now, as we predicted last week, ladies and gentlemen, the news media now reporting that it was Hillary's idea that her good friend Mubarak not step down right away.
Remember the conflicting news we got about this last week?
McMaric needs to go now.
Obama said, we want it now.
And the protesters ramped up the violence.
And Hillary moved in and said, good friend Mubarak not step down right away.
So we need to forget all this talk about the transition needing to start immediately.
It was their French news agency.
Mubarak may need to stay longer to ensure elections succeed in Egypt.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton acknowledged Sunday Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak may need to stay on longer than many of his opponents want in order to ensure that elections succeed.
And it wasn't that long ago, back January 25th, a couple weeks ago, Hillary Clinton Mubarak regime is stable.
Now, this is the same woman who mocked George W. Bush for not finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, even though her husband and she herself had said Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.
Now she's out with conflicting stories, news, ideas on what Mubarak ought to do.
Speaking of weapons of mass destruction, a reminder, we have Donald Rumsfeld at the top of the hour today talk about his book, Known and Unknown.
I got some questions for the former Secretary of Defense.
He'll be here.
What do we have him for, H.R.?
half hour is that what the okay we have him for at least a half hour so So we'll see how it goes.
In the meantime, yesterday, Barack Obama went to the Chamber of Commerce, make a big speech.
Two applause lines in 40 minutes.
Barack Obama lecturing the private sector on proper business practices, expansion, investment, profitability, without a hint of experience, much less a track record of success in the private sector with policies that he signed into law becoming president.
Michelle Obama's out lecturing parents and schools and grocery stores and restaurants on matters of nutrition and healthy eating without a degree, without any past success or knowledge, much less a track record of success regarding anything outside of maintaining toned triceps.
Oh, and working in a hospital.
Listening to accomplished losers lectured on how to win the future walks a fine line between humor and boredom.
But such is the power of the presidency.
This country economically, you'd have to go back quite a while to find a time where we have been in worse shape.
And that's mostly due to giving Obama the benefit of the doubt on his absurd theories of winning the future via massive surges in private sector regulations and spending and all that, lining the pockets of public sector unions, the phony green technology companies, crony capitalism with companies such as GE.
We've tried every way.
We've tried every Obama way.
We've tried every Obama idea and we've lost.
We have listened to every idea, every philosophy.
The future will be won by defeating Obama at the ballot box.
There he is out there lecturing everybody at the Chamber of Commerce.
And the state-controlled media said that his speech was just like JFK.
We have a media montage of them just going bananas over Obama's speech to the chamber.
It was John F. Kennedy sort of asked what you can do for your country speech.
A JFK moment.
Stealing a page from JFK.
A JFK-style challenge to businesses.
A Kennedy-like call to action.
Parking back to President Kennedy.
Sounded like JFK.
Isn't it amazing?
So here we have media all over the country.
It sounded just like JFK.
Just like JFK.
Meanwhile, Obama is going to double the unemployment insurance tax on employers.
Double it.
He didn't mention that the Chamber of Commerce.
But he's going to double it.
He's also going to bail the states out.
That's already started.
Help them with their indebtedness over unemployment compensation benefits in addition to doubling the unemployment insurance tax on employers.
Doesn't tell them that.
No, we've got a JFK moment.
As in, ask not what your country can do for you.
Ask what you can do for your country.
We've got to redistribute wealth.
We have to share corporate profits with the workers.
And good old totalitarian language, share the profits with the workers.
And not enough of that's been going on.
Not enough profit sharing with the workers has been going on.
Well, what did JFK have to say about economics?
Let's go back.
December 14th, 1962, New York City, New York Economic Club, John F. Kennedy.
We have some sound bites of this speech.
This administration pledged itself last summer to an across-the-board top-to-bottom cut in personal and corporate income taxes to be enacted and become effective in 1963.
I'm not talking about a quickie or a temporary tax cut, which would be more appropriate if a recession were imminent.
Nor am I talking about giving the economy a mere shot in the arm to ease some temporary complaint.
The federal government's most useful role is not to rush into a program of excessive increases in public expenditures, but to expand the incentives and opportunities for private expenditures.
Folks, is your mouth open here?
Is your mouth open in utter awe?
John F. Kennedy, they just told us that Obama had a JFK moment.
Here's John F. Kennedy in 1962.
Do not raise expenditures in a recession.
Do not rush into a program of excessive increases in public expenditures in a recession.
Expand incentives and opportunities for private expenditures.
He wanted an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in personal and corporate income taxes.
Not something quickie, not something temporary.
Tax cuts would be appropriate if a recession were imminent, and even more so if we were in one.
There's not one, folks, similarity between JFK's economic recipe in 1962 and Obama's enactment of economic policies in 2009 to the present.
They have nothing in common other than they're both Democrats.
This is how the left, this is how the media excels at history revision.
Take an inaugural speech, ask not what you can do for your country.
Ask not what your country can do for you.
Ask what you can do for your country and tell that to a bunch of CEOs as though they are stealing the country blind when you are, as president, when you are stealing the country blind, when you're spending it into oblivion, you blame it on these guys and then claim it was Kennedy-esque.
Well, there's a problem.
You just heard the first of a few soundbites we have at JFK talking about what to do in similar economic circumstances to today, and it is the exact opposite of what Obama is doing.
Now, here's JFK even admitting here, and he knows about these things, he wasn't talking about a quickie.
JFK knew about those things.
As we all well know, more Kennedy soundbites just to illustrate for you the totally fraudulent attempt to link Obama and JFK in this regard.
Barack Hussein Obama of the regime and his absurd admonitions to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
I don't know what this is.
Is this giving the left some love before the big corporate tax cut?
Is that what this speech was?
Is there a big corporate tax cut coming?
It's sort of like, hey, yeah, you know, we're going to sell a Huffington Post.
And it's so wildly popular.
It's we're going to get $315 million.
Whoa, you people on the left, look at how big we are.
We're selling this thing for $315 million.
Jajar is going to get $18 to $20 of it.
And by the way, we're moving to the center because it didn't sell.
And this $315 million is just the left circling the wagons to try to create the impression it's big and happening.
They'll pay anything to protect their reputations.
They'll spend any price to create the impression that they're not failing.
I mean, we're crying out loud, folks.
JFK moment.
Obama raising taxes, increasing regulations.
Wild federal spending.
A JFK moment?
It's more like a Bill Clinton moment with the media playing the role of Monica Lewinsky.
And it just never stops.
It just keeps going.
Here's more.
This is JFK December 14th in 1962 explaining trickle.
Yes.
It's a Bill Clinton moment with the media playing the role of Monica Lewinsky.
Yes, you heard me right.
Do you realize it takes away the humor sturdily if I have to say things twice?
Trying to maintain the rhythm here.
Speaking of Clinton and Lewinsky, JFK, this is December 14th, 1962, Economic Club, New York.
When consumers purchase more goods, plants use more of their capacity.
Men are hired instead of laid off.
Investment increases and profits are high.
Corporate tax rates must also be cut to increase incentives and the availability of investment capital.
The government has already taken major steps this year to reduce business tax liability and to stimulate the modernization, replacement, and expansion of our productive plan and equipment.
So, as you hear, nothing JFK-esque about any policy Obama has had so far.
So, I'm just wondering if he's not setting the stage here for a corporate tax reduction proposal might be coming down the pipe.
I have to tell you, folks, Obama lecturing America's businesses about how to direct their profits.
How do we sit here with a straight face?
His stimulus plan was a massive failure.
It drove up the deficit to unpayable levels.
Obama care is one of many elements that will, I don't know, if it is fully implemented, it is going to destroy the U.S. private sector as we know it.
Healthcare premiums will go up.
Trillions will be added to the deficit.
Unemployment far higher than the reported and unacceptable 9% level here.
And this guy, the architect of all of this, goes out and lectures the Chamber of Commerce about how to direct their profits.
This is so absurd.
But Mr. Lumboy, he's the president of the United States.
I know that's the real shame of it.
How did that happen, Mr. Newcastle, people like you?
I mean, it is so open to ridicule.
It makes me wonder if this is red meat to the left before some cold water gets poured on them.
You know, like the sale of AOL, that's red meat to the left before they figure out that it was in the dumper.
Obama has said he is open to lowering the corporate tax rate.
And that will more than likely happen.
And I think that's maybe one of the reasons why the media has been given marching artists to go out there and compare Obama to JFK.
So I wouldn't be a bit surprised if that's next to come.
He proposes a cut in the corporate tax rate, which will be fine, by the way.
And then they'll play these Kennedy bites and say, see, it's the Kennedy-esque.
So I think Obama may be in that speech yesterday giving some rhetoric to the left before he signs up for supply-side stimulation in anticipation of the 2012 election.
Just guessing.
Might be wrong.
Wouldn't be surprised.
But the point is, Obama cannot abandon the left, and yet he has to do what he can to try to drive down unemployment, even if it's for show.
Because he's got to show a kinder, gentler side to independents.
His reelection hinges on somehow getting them back from the Republicans.
And if Obama takes real steps to help the private sector, he has to make increasingly absurd and hypocritical speeches to let the left know that Obama hasn't really embraced Reagan.
He's just saying this stuff.
He's got to give him a wink.
He's like, okay, you guys understand here.
For the good of the movement, I got to say this stuff.
I got to do some of this stuff, get re-elected, and then we'll drop the hammer on him again.
That's the wink and nod.
He's got to rely on the sophistication of the left.
And if he can't rely on that, he'll rely on the media to secretly and publicly get that message out to the lunatic fringe.
Well, look what's happening here.
Obamacare under assault.
The blue dogs are abandoning the party.
There are real cuts, deficit cuts being demanded.
And I've got a story here in the stack, a new Democrat threat to the health care law, a handful of moderate Senate Democrats looking for ways to roll it back as part of their re-election bid.
Claire McCaskill has won Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Ben Nelson of Nebraska.
You got that.
And then you've got a story here from, where is it?
I forget what.
Yeah, here to thehill.com.
Blue dogs mull budget defection.
Blue dog Democrats might support a plan from House Republicans to cut $32 billion in discretionary spending.
The bottom line is the Democrats in the House have no power unless they caucus with Republicans.
Zilch Zero, Nancy Pelosi's got nothing.
Nancy Pelosi can't scare the Heath Schulers of the world anymore.
Nancy Pelosi cannot scare these people.
I mean, she can try to tell them, we're going to get back in office in two years, and if you don't support me now, you're toast.
But in the meantime, they have no power unless they caucus with the Republicans.
And so the blue dogs, they are abandoning the Democrat Party.
They're abandoning Pelosi.
There probably are going to be significant spending cuts here, which puts the regime in a bit of a tough spot because Obama wants to get unemployment down to under 8%, reported under 8%.
And if he wants to be seen as being reasonable on the deficit, if he wants to get beyond the failures of Obamacare, he has to go out and spew boilerplate populism.
He has to go out and talk about class warfare, straw men, lies to offset any Reagan-esque steps he may be forced to take or accept.
And he may have to do these things.
He may have to go out and make it look like he's moving to the center and articulate this stuff while giving a wink and a nod to his leftist fringe base.
By the way, Pelosi hadn't even talked to the blue dogs since the election.
So there's a schism, schism there.
And this is, you know, Obama's fully aware of all this.
They're trying to make some hay out of this Egypt business.
And now, lecturing the Chamber of Commerce, the architect of all of this economic failure, lecturing these people on what to do with their profits.
What these people know is the longer this guy's in office, there aren't going to be any profits.
And whatever profits there are, he's going to take and redistribute himself.
Here's one more JFK bite from his speech to the New York Economic Club in December of 1962.
And again, we're playing these for you because the media template here that Obama's speech of the chamber was Kennedy-esque.
Our true choice is not between tax reduction on the one hand and the avoidance of large federal deficits on the other.
It is increasingly clear that no matter what party is in power, so long as our national security needs keep rising, an economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenues to balance our budget, just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits.
Surely the lesson of the last decade is that budget deficits are not caused by wild-eyed spenders, but by slow economic growth and periodic recessions.
And any new recession would break all deficit records.
In short, it is a paradoxical truth that tax rates are too high today and tax revenues are too low.
And the soundest way to raise the revenues in the long run is to cut the rates now.
Now, they're out there comparing this to Obama, or I'm just saying Obama to that.
And it ain't true.
There is no comparison.
So they're either setting this up as Obama's going to do some stuff that sounds like this, or else they're just trying to pull the wool over our eyes, knowing full well that outside of this program, nobody's going to know that the JFK said anything like this.
Hey, for you people out there in the stick to the issues crowd, I got people on the phones who want to talk about Super Bowl a little bit, so we're going to get to it.
But one thing here, we're talking about Obama, Kennedy taxes, and so forth.
AP with a story yesterday, by one measure, federal taxes lowest since 1950.
They started by asking, Are taxes too high?
Actually, as a share of the nation's economy, Uncle Sam's take this year will be the lowest since 1950 when the Korean War was just getting underway.
What they're basically saying is tax revenue is down.
Uncle Sam not getting his fair share.
Tax revenue is down thanks to the recession, which had been going on over 19 months.
Tax revenue is down because 17% of the population isn't working.
Tax revenue is down because a whole bunch of people have no jobs and aren't paying any taxes.
But they want you to think taxes are down because our rates are too low.
AP is running a piece here that basically says we need to raise federal income taxes.
The poor economy is to blame with corporate profits down and unemployment up.
But so is a tax code that grows each year with new deductions, credits, and exemptions.
So they've, you know, this is the truth.
AP, just an arm of Obama.
And you have the president saying one thing to the Chamber of Commerce.
Here's AP wringing its hand.
Oh, well, tax revenues to the Fed.
Imagine that.
When is the last time the AP ran a story on, oh my gosh, how hard is it for people to live when they're fired and have no income?
No, when it's a Democrat president, we get stories about the new discoveries of life await you on the unemployment line.
New togetherness with your family, new togetherness with your children, a new purpose in life.
Republican president, you're unemployed.
You may as well go commit suicide.
Poor old federal, poor old Uncle Sam getting the short end of the stick.
Right.
Because of Obama.
You want to look at it that way.
Bill in Park Falls, Wisconsin.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Ditto's Rush.
Thank you.
How come you're tiptoeing around the big story of the day?
You mean the Packers win, I assume?
The world champion Green Bay Packers.
Well, I'm not trying to sidestep it.
If I had been here yesterday, I would have talked about it.
I assumed, I mean, this is two days after the Super Bowl.
Oh, the big party is today at Lambeau.
Well, that's true.
What time is that?
3.30 or 4 o'clock?
43 o'clock, I guess.
Central time.
Yep.
Yeah, wisely scheduled for when this program is.
The schools are closed.
It's a big deal.
Yeah, well, I was there.
I was there.
And I'll tell you, I saw a quote the coach Mike McCarthy the day before the game.
I love quotes like this.
Coach Mike McCarthy said, look, we respect the Steelers.
We respect the way they play football, but this is our time.
And then I read that Coach McCarthy, I'm not sure when this happened.
I've seen conflicting reports.
But Coach McCarthy, either the night before the game or sometime in the week leading up to it, had his team fitted for Super Bowl rings.
Oh, yes, yes, that's true.
I remember some years ago, the Steelers and the Patriots were playing in the AFC championship game, and the Patriots got wind of the news that the Steelers were, before the championship game was over, the Steelers were already making plans to go to the Super Bowl, family hotel reservations and flights.
And that motivated the pedro, yeah, you think you're going to be there?
And they went out and shellacked him.
So that kind of motivation would go either way if the Steelers had found out about it.
But I thought it was a brilliant motivation to play because they're going to get rings anyway.
They're going to get, even if they lose the Super Bowl, the Packers are going to get NFC championship rings, for which they have to be fitted.
So why not fit them for the ring for the big prize, coupled with everything else he was doing?
Yep.
How's that?
Great.
All right.
You on Wisconsin, Rush.
Thank you very much.
I got nothing against the Packers.
I want everybody to understand.
I've got nothing whatsoever against the Persians.
Yeah, the Steelers are my team, but nothing against the Packers.
The Packers, people forget this.
The only National Football League team to ever have a rushroom was the Green Bay Packers.
It was led by offensive tackle Ken Moran and the offensive, maybe he's a guard, right guard Ken Moran on their side, the offensive tackle Ken Rutgers.
And these guys turned this program on was Brett Favre's first to second year.
And this guy's turned on this program each and every day at once time and listened to it.
And Rutgers sent me a picture of all the members of the Packers Rushroom Club in their jerseys wearing rush ties.
He said, no, if you send me some neckties, I'll put these on the guys who take a picture.
So I've got this picture of Rutgers, Rich Moran, and it was Moran who supplied the radio for the Packers Rush Room.
And the only guy, only one Democrat in the group, at least professed Democrat, his name is Matt Labounte.
He was the linebacker.
And he turned his back to the camera when the picture was up.
But he had Shimora.
I mean, that whole great Packers team.
Literally, I have all the respect in the world for the Packers organization and the people there.
That's why I thought it was a great, great, great Super Bowl matchup.
But I figured it's Tuesday.
You people have had this game sliced and diced and dissected and why who won one and why.
So I figured Super Bowl's over.
We move on.
But there are apparently some people here who can't get enough on the winning side.
I have to take a break here before we continue, though.
And remember, Donald Rumsfeld at the top of the next hour talk about his new book.
We'll have him for a half hour.
Those of you who are on hold, stay there.
Put the phone down, go do something.
But you're on hold because we want to talk to you.
See, if you have the time, and we know you do, we'll get to you after the Rumsfeld interview and before the program ends today.
I'm shocked.
I sent Stein yesterday a whole bunch of things to convey about Super Bowl, and I'm told he never got to it.
I thought he would have covered it all by now.
Well, that changes things just a little.
So maybe we will have a bit of a review of the Super Bowl.
Also, as I say, Donald Rumsfeld in about six or seven minutes, we get to the next hour.
And tonight is episode five of the Haney Project.
And tonight is at Bakers Bay in the Bahamas.
And this episode is where, in fact, Hank Haney says, if the episode ended today, if the series ended today, it would be a huge success.
▲
Export Selection