All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 26, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:16
January 26, 2011, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings to you, music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists all across.
The fruited plane.
This is the award-winning thrill pact, ever exciting.
Increasingly popular.
Growing by leaps and bounds.
Rush Limbaugh program.
And this is the EIB Network.
Great to have you here.
Already Wednesday.
Only ten days to the Super Bowl.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
The email address El Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
Egypt's president.
Egypt president's son and family flee to Britain.
This would be Hazni Mubarik, the Egyptian dictator, his son, considered to be his successor, has fled to Britain along with his family.
The plane with Gamal Mubarak, his wife and daughter on board, left for London Tuesday from an airport in western Cairo.
The report came as violent unrest broke out in Cairo and other Egyptian cities, and hundreds of thousands of people reportedly took to the streets in a Tunisia-inspired day of revolt.
That's exactly what's going on here, folks.
This is an extension of the so-called Tunisian revolution, also known as the Jasmine Revolution.
Now, the uh demonstrations and riots are reported to have started over high unemployment, rampant food and energy inflation, government corruption, and the uh suppression of freedom of speech.
But don't worry, it uh can't happen here.
Any wonder why Obama didn't talk about this last night, the State of the Union.
I mean, he was one of our great Muslim buddy nations.
Big problems out there, and this is there's a major concern uh over whether or not Mubarak can hang on to power over there.
And what is frightening about this to a lot of people is uh an Islamist government replacing Mubarak's regime would be bad news for Israel.
Now, all of this is happening under the banner of hope and change.
And the bow.
And remember what was the I I dare say it was the Cairo speech.
Was it not?
That President Obama engaged in early on during his regime's early days.
To uh extend the hand of peace and so forth.
They're reach out over there.
Over 30,000 protesters gathered in Cairo's Square, Big Square, did it take part in the day of anger.
Police used tear gas and water cannon to break up the protest.
They arrested 40.
Don't have official figures on the number of arrests all across.
Egypt, the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that Washington believed the Egyptian government was stable and urged restraint on both sides.
This is this is um this is not good news.
I'm gonna sit here and take it lightly because we're not there, but this actually is not good news.
Uh let's take a look at some of the other media response to the State of the Union show last night.
Cheryl Gay Stolberg in the New York Times.
Obama pitches global fight for U.S. jobs in address.
President Obama challenged Americans on Tuesday night to unleash their creative spirit, set aside their partisan differences, and come together around a common goal of outcompeting other nations in a rapidly shifting global economy.
In a State of the Union address to a newly divided Congress, Obama outlined when he called a plan to win the future.
By the way, let me translate that for you.
Win the future is all about 2012.
And his re-election.
And I'm serious.
Win the future has nothing to do with American competitiveness or American advancement.
Win the future is all about 2012.
And this outline was a blueprint for spending in critical areas like education.
See, this is this is I you can't believe the stuff he says anymore.
It's just it's it's it's mindless.
Like Jim Dement said, spending on education.
I don't know if you're like me.
I'm insulted when I hear we can't we aren't spinning it up in education.
That's all I hear is we spend money on education.
We're paying taxes out the wazoo for a whole bunch of stuff.
And we're spending property taxes, income taxes, I don't care what it is.
And every day we're insulted.
We need to increase our investments in education.
No, we don't.
Investments in education are not the problem.
Right here, New York Times story is today.
Few students show proficiency in science tests show.
On the most recent nationwide science test, about a third of fourth graders and a fifth of Hascruel seniors scored at or above the proficiency level.
Just a third.
Only one or two students out of every 100 displayed the level of mastery that the federal panel governing the test defined as advanced.
The science tests, known as the National Assessment of Education Progress, were administered in early 2009 to about 308,000 fourth graders and eighth graders and 11,000 twelfth graders.
They tested students' knowledge and abilities in the physical sciences, life science, and Earth and space science.
Because the education department changed the test since it was last administered in 2005.
The latest results cannot be used to determine whether science achievement has risen or declined in re Well, that's clever.
Change the test so we don't know if we're doing any better or not.
How'd they change the test?
They dumb it down like everything else the education department does, or did they make it harder?
A higher proportion of fourth grade students scored at or above the proficient level in New Hampshire.
Forty-seven percent.
That's higher than any other state.
In Montana, 41% of eighth graders scored at or above proficiency.
The bipartisan panel.
Bipartisan panel?
What bipartisan panel?
The National Assessment of Education for the Bipartisan Panel?
What does that look like?
What the hell do you have a bipartisan panel for in an education?
Well, holy moly.
You know what education is?
You know what?
You know why these test results are going down?
Education equals money for teachers.
Education doesn't equal test scores.
By the same token, infrastructure equals money for public sector unions.
It doesn't mean new roads and bridges.
We already did that.
We did a stimulus bill.
And for what?
Nearly a trillion dollars to fix our crumbling roads and bridges.
And here's two years later in the present state of union calling for more, but we didn't fix it.
Where'd the money go?
It got spent.
Well, I'll tell you where.
Money for public sector unions.
Education, money for teachers' unions.
That's how you translate this stuff.
Does anybody in the right mind knows we don't need to spend any money more money on education?
Or put another way.
Everybody knows we're not short changing education.
And that's the implication in these speeches.
We need to invest more in our education.
No.
The assumption is we're not investing in our kids, and that's not true.
Well, maybe it is true.
We're investing in the teachers.
Well, we're investing in the teachers' unions, and that's a big difference.
But how do you put together a bipartisan education panel?
A liberal and a conservative, an evolutionist and a creationist, a warmer and a denier, union member, non-union member.
Let me summarize this for you.
We got Cheryl J. J. J. Cheryl Gay Stolberg, New York Times Obama pitches global fight for U.S. jobs and address.
We need a blueprint for new spending in science and all of this.
And we got a report here that says young skulls full of mush who excel at science are as rare in America as telephone booths.
But it isn't because we're not spending enough money on them.
Now this is not surprising to those of us who have followed education issues.
But still, the results are depressing.
Here's the obvious question, then.
Ladies and gentlemen.
We're spending all this money.
We have been spending all this money for years.
We've got the president calling for, and we've every president, by the way.
It's nothing uh unique to Obama.
Every president has Exhorted us and our children to higher math scores and science scores.
There's nothing new there.
So the question is if kids are not being taught and challenged in the sciences, what are they being taught?
Teaching them something in there.
Well, let's go.
Okay, let's go down the list.
Self-esteem, sex education, gym, conflict resolution, MTV 101, sex education, uh sex education, oh yeah, polar bears environmental destruction.
We're teaching them a liberal political agenda.
Exactly right.
There are only so many hours in a screw-all day.
And if they're not learning science, what are they learning?
That's right.
Self-esteem.
Self-esteem.
Eighth grade students should be able to relate characteristics of air masses to global regions.
High school seniors should be able to evaluate two methods for helping to control an invasive species, the government said.
Well, what is the most invasive species?
The government is.
The government is the most invasive species out there.
Do you think that's being taught?
Okay, let me let me I'll put on my teacher head.
I I think some of what we do here is teach.
So let me put on my teacher cap here.
Seniors should be able to evaluate two methods for helping to control an invasive species.
All right.
For you, students, I don't care how old you are, the most invasive species that we face today is the government.
The next logical question is how do you control this?
How do you fight it?
How how how do you stop this invasive species of government?
It's very simple.
It's called vote conservative.
And we're back.
Great to have you here, Rush Limboy.
And who's next?
Chicago, this is Victor.
It's nice to have you with us on the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
How are you doing, Rush?
Good.
Rush, uh, I believe that uh history will show Obama was good for America.
May I elaborate?
Uh yeah, but feel free.
It's a free country.
You know, all that has been exposed under this president, uh, he's been about as subtle as a pack of wolves in your kitchen.
Uh i it's got it's bad for the media, for the other people in Congress, for all Democrats, for the party in general.
I mean, this guy is a disaster for us.
What but what I'm planning to say is that they would have did this in a smaller step increment, and it would have been done in the long run.
Yeah.
This guy came out like a bull in a China shop and it just went right at it, which is exposed and educated, brought the Tea Party to the forefront, and I believe in the long run, that's his contribution to this country.
Well, I I see your point.
I um I would not have recommended this as a way to advance the country.
Uh others did.
There were others who said, look, Rush, we need to elect these worthless liberals and let them go on and have and have free reign so people will finally see what they're all about.
And my fear was, yeah, but the damage they can do in the time it's gonna take for them to expose themselves is and this guy has set us back two generations.
I I agree with you.
I've had a lot of people tell me that he's the best thing that ever happened to conservatism.
But the damage that he's done is real.
The damage the left has done is real, and then in terms of the spending, the indebtedness, uh, the all of the problems that that are that attached to that, it's gonna take years.
If we're successful even in starting to roll it back, it's gonna it's gonna take years to fix this.
If if he would have not been elected, and let's say McCain would have been, let's say ten years they did this real subtly, they would have dumbed down more kids in society.
I agree with you.
They're easier.
If somebody McCain had been elected, so we got a Republican going along with half of this, we'd have been dead.
Yes.
I agree with you.
But uh I'll I'll tell you the the media can cover for this guy for a long time.
And it's it's it's awfully optimistic uh to think that this is a final death knell for these guys because it isn't.
The media is a very powerful bunch.
You know that Look at it this way.
A lot of people still, after 23 years are struggling.
Why does media do this?
Why is the media do that?
Think of this as a football game.
And the Liberals are one team, the conservatives are another, and the media as the referees.
We've got a rigged bunch of referees.
We do not have referees.
So our side, the conservatives, the refs are against us.
The refs rule against us all the time, rule in favor of the other guys, and plus the other guys are the team.
So we're and it's it's always been this way, and it always will be this way.
Well, remember this, Rush.
We are the attendees to the game.
Eventually we're gonna stop showing up.
Yeah, as in a in a in an atlas shrugged sense that you mean.
Yes.
Yeah.
But I that's what I want to say to you, Rush.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you.
You bet.
Have a wonderful day in Chicago, if you can.
Jay Middlebury, Indiana.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hi.
Thanks, Russ.
It's an honor to talk to you.
You bet, sir.
Hey, uh, my question is you know, the the oil prices, you know, a couple years ago when the fuel prices were up, you know, four bucks almost, and the economy, you know, is decreasing, obviously.
Yeah.
Um I feel that we're at that point again where these oil prices are going up.
And it's put in construction, which is my uh experience that I do.
And uh I feel that that they're getting back up there again and living in R V land, you know.
Is it what what's gonna happen here again if these continue to rise?
That's my question.
If if the oil price and gasoline price continues to rise.
Yes, sir.
Um take a look at the UK.
This is a story the American media is not covering.
In the UK, they are the they've uh quieted down for the moment, but last week and two weeks ago, there were veritable riots over the rising price of gasoline.
Steep immediate quick rises in energy costs, put the brakes on almost every other aspect of a person's economic activity, spending power and all of that.
Energy is something that you have to you have to get to work.
Uh you have to heat your home.
You have to be able to cook food.
There are certain things that energy is required for.
The more expensive it is, uh, the more people have to give up in other areas of life.
And and we've learned, I think that four dollars per gallon is the tipping point in this country.
That's when people will start throwing people out of office.
That's that's when an anger hits, and it's probably gonna be the same still if it ever gets to four bucks.
Uh and I I've I th I think this is something on top of the economy as it is.
See, the president last night telling people we're in the economy, we're in a recovery.
Nobody believes it.
The lunch focus group, Hannity had last night on his show after the uh State of the Union speech.
They talked to a bunch of these people.
That was one of the points they made.
What economy is he talking about?
We still have millions of people without jobs and no prospect for finding jobs.
The guy's out there talking about a booming recovery, we've got to keep it going.
There's a giant disconnect here.
I think people are tired of hearing from the guy, and it's the same thing over and over and over again.
So I don't know.
I I don't know if riots or or what have you, but but but certainly uh nothing that would redound positively to anybody in power.
And should it happen here, you watch Obama's just dying, just aiming to blame all this stuff on the new arrivals in town, the Republicans, the Congress.
And he'll point out that's where all the laws start, that's where all the uh legislation is.
Uh the Republicans arrive, this and that.
So it's and it's gonna heat up intensely as the twenty twelve election uh unfolds before our very eyes.
I'm glad you called, Jay.
Thanks uh very much.
Hi, welcome back.
Great to have you here.
It always is.
Uh, ladies and gentlemen, I, Rush Limbaugh, your guiding light, period.
Lavonia, Michigan, this is uh autumn, and welcome.
Nice to have you with us today.
Hi, Rush.
It's great to talk to you.
Thank you.
I had um just two quick points to make about the Hollywood story that you were talking about earlier.
Um, you know, who cares about the acting awards?
I mean, everybody wants to direct, right?
So here's the happen.
You know, it was Larry King's most often asked question of an actor or actress.
To be sitting there with those hunched shoulders and the s and the and the and the uh suspenders, and he'd So you have a great point there.
Okay.
Well, I have a great solution too.
Um how about Hollywood has to use the same um criteria that the NFL was forced to use when they were hiring coaches.
And they have to go through uh, you know, uh panel of of minority directors first before they can, you know, put Michael Bay in charge of running another picture.
She is talking, ladies and gentlemen, referring to the Rooney rule.
The Rooney rule is named after its uh creator, Dan Rooney, the chairman emeritus of the Pittsburgh Steelers, the current ambassador to Ireland, and the Rooney rule is that you s you must interview minorities for coaching openings.
They'll say you didn't have to hire, but you have to seriously interview.
Yes, right.
And some teams do, and some teams have skirted it and been fined.
So what you're suggesting is that Hollywood directors, producers, executive producers must seriously screen test black actors and actresses for before fully casting the film.
Well well, to direct their pictures, sure.
Absolutely.
I mean, what that's only fair, right?
If it's fair for football, why you know.
Another thing that Hollywood's exempt on too is if if what the author of that story that you were talking about earlier is correct, why is it that Hollywood is allowed to be mandated by the dictates of the free market, but not any other industry in the country.
That's an interesting question.
Remember now it was a uh um an African American contributor on that blog who said, Look, we gotta understand here Hollywood has to make movies they think people are gonna pay to see that year.
What he's saying is if the directors think that the time is not right for a black actor in that role, then it's okay, we gotta go with it.
And that's a great question.
Well, if Hollywood's allowed to go free market, why not everybody else?
Why can't big oil?
Why can't a car or the auto industry?
Like, why can't they make you know cars that people want to drive that will fit my family?
Why you know, why are they being to make you know electric cars and vehicles that no one about it?
How many how many electric cars did Obama promise to have on the roads last night?
hundred million or something, not a hundred million, but he promised a certain number and nobody cared.
You're you're exactly right.
Autumn, what do you do?
Um actually I'm a homeschooling mom, and you should probably hear some of my kids in the background here.
Well, I do, but they sound happy, and you are obviously a great educator.
Well, Rush, I have to tell you that um as the kids get older and uh we start, you know, introducing um, you know, great thinkers and philosophers, um, we will be incorporating the great El Roche bow into our curriculum because um you know, in the modern era of thinking, you are uh uh a national treasure and uh you will definitely be part of our curriculum in in the upcoming future.
That's that's for sure.
Thank you very much.
That is I have learned a lot from you.
I appreciate that.
I really and at what age do you plan on introducing the young skulls full of mush?
Well, we already do at certain at certain level, you know, at a certain level that they can understand.
Well, I was gonna suggest that it's never too early.
No, absolutely.
That that's exactly right.
And so uh, you know, we try to squeeze, you know, a little bit that they can, you know, understand um here and there.
But uh yeah, we'll be going, you know, more into it in the um you know, a little bit upper um grade school.
Well, best to you, Autumn, and congratulations on your efforts.
Thank you very much.
Thanks, I keep doing what you do what you do because um you're great at it and we love you and we need you.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate it.
That's Autumn from Lavonia, Michigan.
Next up is Edward in Shelby Township, Michigan.
Where are you, sir?
Oh, hi, Russia.
Uh we're about thirty miles outside of uh New Felouja.
I can't you know, I'll never forget the trouble I got into with our affiliate in Detroit there, WJR when I referred it as New Fallujah.
The then president of the radio station, Mike Pezy called me and said, You gotta I know what you meant here.
You gotta, you gotta.
I said, You can't be serious.
People took it seriously.
So, well, I don't want to run the risk.
I heard your caller uh say that yesterday, and it I hadn't heard it for a while.
I go, Oh, yeah, I'm not sure.
Well, we just changed it to Fallujah and threw away the new.
Yeah.
Um honor to speak to you again.
Um I've uh been listening uh going on 20 years now, so it's been quite a while.
I have real I I I appreciate I can't I'm I'm stunned when I hear people have done that, and I really thank you.
Yeah.
Well, my we enjoy it, and uh we uh we appreciate you very, very much.
Um what I was calling about was, of course, the president's speech and how I thought um basically what you said, this was his you know kickoff for re-election, but I thought it was a speech for really useful idiots, like uh the drive-by's the unions, the left, the Hollywood group, and of course the independents, the people who can't make a decision for themselves.
Well, no, wait, they did make a decision for themselves, and it was to abandon the Democrats last November.
Yes, they did.
This this and this was one of the few times I can remember that happening.
Um, ever since Jimmy Carter and uh Ronald Reagan, uh when they went big for Reagan.
Um I don't know why we should listen to anything that he you know spoke about in in his speech because he's lied to us in the past on just about everything he said, done everything behind closed doors.
Yeah.
And then the one thing that really stuck in my craw was when he said this, and you know what he meant.
He says we're either gonna move forward together or not at all.
And pretty much saying that, you know, if we don't if I don't get what we want, we're not going anywhere.
Well, but even if he didn't mean it, if if you even if he meant it genuinely, we move together, or we don't move at all.
Screw that.
I don't know about you, but I'm not waiting for everybody else to follow me as I climb the ladder.
No.
I mean, that's ridiculous.
Uh any any thinking person who wants to get ahead in life, or doesn't want to get ahead.
Either way, but to say something like that, I think is a kind of an insult uh to the American people who have been so innovative over the years.
I know.
That's exactly right.
And one of one of my problems with the thing, and there were many was it's hard to take any of it seriously because you know he doesn't believe half of it.
They put it on the prompter, I believe half of it, and that's why I think it came off flat.
I You know, faking passion.
I I uh put yourself in a position of having to give a speech, and where the most important thing, the thing that you believe in the most, and you want to persuade people to agree with you is liberalism.
Ask yourself if you could do it.
If you were good enough to fake it and get away with that.
I don't think too many people are, and I don't think he had it in him last night to uh do it.
It was all part of strategy, let's make everybody think I'm moving to the center.
The media's got everybody thinking that.
People want to think that, so let's go ahead and just say the words and then we'll head out to Manitawak, Wisconsin, and say, let's uh it's worth Sputnik, Phil.
I have to come here, Sputnik's a big deal, and we'll just keep moving to more 2012 re-election.
Thanks for the call.
I appreciate it, uh Edward very much.
Audio soundbites Bob Schiefer's State of the Union last night special coverage.
Katie Currick talked to him uh about uh Michelle Bachman delivering a Tea Party response.
Katie Courig said, how serious do you see this chasm developing?
The GOP leadership allowing Bachman to speak out there after Paul Ryan.
What's going on, Bob?
You have all the answers.
What do you say about that?
The fact that the Republican leadership is letting Michelle Bachman make a second response here, just underlines that.
I mean, my heavens, can you imagine what Sam Rayburn, when he was Speaker of the House, would have done if one of his members had said, Oh, by the way, I'm gonna make a response too.
Or Lyndon Johnson when he was the leader of the Senate.
They are letting her make this speech because they're afraid to tell her not to, because they know how powerful these Tea Party people were in the power they had in the last election.
What happened to diversity making us strong?
Whatever happened to that, Bob.
I thought I thought diversity uh was uh was a pillar.
One of the foundational building blocks of our great culture.
Except when the Republicans exhibit some.
We have some of Michelle Bachman and her response.
Let's uh listen to a couple or three of them.
Let me show you a chart.
Here are unemployment rates over the past ten years.
In October of 2001, our national unemployment rate was at 5.3%.
In 2008, it was at 6.6%.
But just eight months after President Obama promised lower unemployment, that rate spiked to a staggering 10.1%.
Today, unemployment is at 9.4%, with about 400,000 new claims every week.
Media made fun of her for using charts.
They loved parole when he did it.
And they also chided her for not looking into the camera.
She was uh didn't look straight in the camera.
People wondered what she was looking at.
Uh here's the next bite.
And this is Obamacare and light bulbs.
What did we buy?
Instead of a leaner, smarter government, we bought a bureaucracy that now tells us which light bulbs to buy, and which may put 16,500 IRS agents in charge of policing President Obama's health care bill.
In the end, unless we fully repeal Obamacare, a nation that currently enjoys the world's finest health care might be forced to rely on government-run coverage.
That could have a devastating impact on our national debt for even generations to come.
And finally, this.
I thought Paul Ryan did a wonderful job, and this wasn't at all competition with what the GOP official response was.
The Tea Party Express asked me if I would speak to their constituency right after the State of the Union, and we would do that via internet.
It was actually the media over the weekend that decided to make this a competition.
They all know that this had nothing to do with the competition, and we all go to the microphones after the State of the Union and speak to people across the country.
And CNN covered it.
Nobody saw it, but they covered it.
By the way, I don't mind somebody, Michelle Bachman, a little clumsy in the use of a teleprompter.
A little real, I don't mind it at all.
Somebody that uh probably didn't need one, and that may be one of the reasons that she wasn't looking at the camera.
And one of the more hilarious headlines of the day is from Salon.com.
Why does the GOP hide its agenda?
It's it's it's an article about Bachman and Paul Ryan's responses.
Hiding the agenda.
They laid it out.
Now, folks, look at me.
Valentine's Day is coming up.
Do the smart thing and order your flowers early so you can just relax.
You know you're gonna put it off, you're gonna put it off, you're thinking it's just a phone call away, a website visit away, you keep putting it off, and it's gonna gnaw at you, and even if you don't know it, it's gonna lead to being a little bit disquieted, not quite comfortable.
Just get it over with and get it behind you, and it's amazing how free you will feel.
Today only you can get a dozen red roses plus a free Ruby vase for just 29.99 plus shipping at ProFlowers.com.
Impress her this holiday.
These are classic red roses.
You cannot go wrong.
The price of roses will skyrocket during Valentine's Week.
Always happens.
You can lock in this price right now and save.
And don't think eh, they're gonna come up with something in flowers.
He expects flaw.
Don't make that mistake.
Flowers never fail.
In fact, they're expected if you bomb on this, thinking that you got to come up with something better than flowers, and you're gonna go into all kinds of procrastination.
What do I get besides flowers?
Don't do that.
Flowers work every time they're tried.
I don't care what else you're thinking.
Proflowers is great.
They guarantee delivery on Valentine's Day.
That's a Monday.
The roses are guaranteed to stay fresh for at least seven days.
Now, this early bird deal is today.
Don't wait.
The only Way to get these red roses with a free Ruby vase, call 800 PRO Flowers and mention Rush.
Or go to my website they've set up just for you for this.
RushProflowers.com.
800 P R O Flowers, mention my name or RushProflowers.com.
The offer's good for today only at this price.
And don't doubt me on this.
You can't.
You cannot screw up by giving flowers.
Not possible.
No matter what you think.
Representative Dennis Kucinich has filed a lawsuit over a sandwich he bought at a congressional cafeteria.
Basically, folks, he bit into an olive pit in a sandwich wrap in April 2008.
He said it led to serious permanent devil and oral injuries.
He's seeking 150,000 in damages.
The Terrytown mob just throw their olive pits in the water up there, but uh he didn't have the presence of his suing over an olive pit.
And my friends, these Democrat women, uh I don't want to get in their way.
Behind closed doors, California Representative Ler Democrat Loretta Sanchez has proposed removing Gabriel Giffords from the House Armed Services Committee until she recovers.
The proposal sparked an outrage, according to those in the room, including from those in Sanchez's own party.
It's not appropriate.
Said Democrat Representative Sylvestre Reyes.
Reyes and Representative Adam Smith of Washington put up most of the fight against Sanchez and helped squash the idea.
From a woman who memorialized her cat, you think she showed a little bit more compassion for a woman shot in the face, said one Republican aide, referring to Sanchez 2010 Christmas card that paid tribute to her late cat Gretzky.
Man, oh man, oh man, Loretta Sanchez wants to kick Gabriel Giffords off of her committee.
Party of compassion.
Don't get in her way.
Okay, folks, a programming note and reminder.
We're going to be in Los Angeles tomorrow, and that means there's no ditto cam.
Our uh remote satellite studio out there is not yet so equipped.
Our ditto cam here is uh permanently installed, it doesn't travel, so no ditto cam tomorrow.
Coco, you better put up a big reminder on the website.
And then uh Mark Stein will be here on Friday as a couple super secret things taking place in Los Angeles.
So see you tomorrow from LA and look forward to it.
▲
Export Selection