All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 19, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:44
January 19, 2011, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Now, I read this out of context.
I'm watching Obama and Hu Xintao.
And by the way, the Chinese, they go with their last names first.
So whose name is actually Jintao Hu in anglicized Xiaoping Dong, Setong Mao is actually, they always put their last names first out there.
Criticism.
No, don't misunderstand it.
It's how it is.
So I'm watching these two guys, and I see a graphic on the screen that encapsulates something Obama has said at some point during the proceedings here.
It said, Obama, quote, we want to sell China planes, cars, and software.
And I imagine, you know, when Hu Zhintao listens to this and his translator gets to that point, you know, what does Hu Zhintao think when he hears the president say, we want to sell China planes, cars, and software?
Who says, why should we buy it when we can steal it?
Why should we buy it when we own it and are paying for it anyway?
Why don't you give it to us?
Also, be prepared at these things, at these kind of joint soires with the United States and the Chikoms.
Just be aware.
You have to learn how to listen to the Chikoms.
When you hear Hu Zhintao talk about mutual respect, what that means.
You know what it means, Snerdley?
No.
It does not mean we will bury you, we will conquer you.
I'm sure they already think that.
Mutual respects means shut the hell up about our human rights abuses.
Don't talk to me about the Fulan Gong.
I don't want to hear.
I don't want to hear about Tibet.
Don't even bring up the Dalai Lama.
We like the fact you made him go out the back door next to the trash.
Don't talk to me about human rights abuses.
And in private, Hu Zhintao is going to say to Obama, come on now, what's more important?
Human rights or cheap iPhones and iPads.
Chikoms, they're not going to say, I mean, they'll go through the motions of letting us preach to them, but in private.
At any rate, welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, the fastest three hours in media.
Here we are at the EIB network of the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Why am I the only what?
I don't think I'm the only one that recognizes how evil communism is.
I think a lot of people recognize how evil it is.
There just aren't many in the Democrat Party and there aren't many in the media, but there are a lot of people that still don't.
You know, Obama just praised the ChiCom's progress in Africa.
Now, what are the Chinese doing in Africa?
Do you happen to know, Snerdley?
They are colonizing the place.
They are essentially colonizing.
They are becoming the most vicious colonialists in history.
They're buying up, just as you say, they're buying up regional resources.
They're letting the locals survive or starve, essentially.
And remember, Obama's father hated colonialism.
He despised it.
So, and here's Obama, the big anti-colonialist, praising the Chikoms for their progress in Africa.
And what's really convoluted about this, and here he praises, he praises Chikom capitalism.
He praises Chi-Com free markets.
They're bad in this country, but they're great over there in China.
I'll tell you who else.
Former communists recognize how evil communism is.
We had a story about the Russian immigrants in Staten Island just this week.
They don't want any part of any of this going on.
The Democrat Party today reminds them too much of what they fled in Moscow.
Staten Island Republicans re-reported that.
Anyway, as I was saying, telephone number is 800-282-2882.
As the House prepares to debate on the future of the $1 trillion health care overhaul, 200 economists have asked members of Congress to repeal it.
It's a letter.
It includes the signatures of Douglas Holtz Eakin and June O'Neill, both former directors of the Congressional Budget Office, Art Laffer Brian Westbury, Chairman of the U.S. Congress, Joint Economic Committee, William Niscanon, former chairman, President's Council of Economic Advisors, Chairman Emeritus of the Cato Institute.
There's a story here.
This is in the Wall Street Journal.
A little more over here.
Yeah.
The coming doctor shortage.
We cannot insure 32 million more people and cut funding to train doctors by 60 billion, which is what is happening.
Well, the Deficit Commission is proposing that, did propose it.
I mean, this is the kind of reason I mentioned, what do you mean, rush $60 billion, cut doctor funding?
This is what you get when you start talking spending cuts.
The left, in order to scare people into not supporting spending cuts, they start talking, okay, we're going to have to cut the cops.
We're going to have to cut the fire department.
We're going to have to cut Santa Claus.
We're going to have to cut sewage.
We're going to have to cut this.
And we're going to have to cut doctors.
Oh, no.
No, no, don't cut my fire department.
Don't cut my fire department.
Don't cut my doctor.
Okay, well, then we can't have any spending cuts.
From CNBC, actually, it's a Reuters story.
Nearly two-thirds of U.S. doctors surveyed fear that health care reform could worsen for patients by flooding their orifices and hurting income, according to a Thompson Reuters survey released yesterday.
This is a survey of more than 2,900 doctors.
It found many predict the legislation, Obamacare, will force them to work harder for less money.
When asked about the quality of health care in the U.S. over the next five years, 65% of these 3,000 doctors believe that it would deteriorate.
Only 18% predicted it would improve.
No matter where you look, the news on this is devastating.
In other economic news, builders began work last year on the second fewest number of homes in more than 50 years as the weak economy kept people from buying houses.
What?
Weak economy.
Redlining against the minorities again, I'll bet.
Builders broke ground on a total of 587,600 homes in 2010, just barely better than the 554,000 started in 2009.
2009, 2010 are two of the worst years on record dating back to 1959 for home construction.
And the pace is getting worse.
The Commerce Department says builders started work at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of just 529,000 new homes and apartments last month.
That's a drop of 4.3%.
Now, isn't there something conspicuously missing from all this?
Somehow, somehow, the only blame, it's an AP story, the only blame AP can find here is on the faceless weak economy.
Yeah, The weak economy, which has no face, and it ought to have a face, that of Obama.
The weak economy is the reason for so few homes being built.
No mention of Obama.
No mention of the Congressional Democrats who've had as much power over the economy as it's possible to have for the last two years.
You have heard, no doubt, of all the Australian flooding.
You may have seen photos of all the Australian flooding.
Would it surprise you to know that one of the reasons they were unprepared for it is because they have been warned for years of upcoming droughts due to global warming.
This is from Christopher Booker at the Telegraph, the UK Telegraph.
What was the role of warmists in the Queensland flood disaster?
Australia was told to prepare for droughts as a result of climate change, and they let down their guard against flooding, according to Christopher Booker.
Even or ever more alarming facts are emerging to show how Brisbane's floods were made infinitely worse by cockeyed decisions inspired by the obsession of the Australian authorities with global warming.
Inevitably, the country's warmest lobby has been voluble in claiming that such a freak weather event, as the BBC called the floods, is a consequence of man-made climate change.
But far from being an unprecedented freak event, the latest flood was nearly a foot below the level of one in 1974, 10 feet below the record set in 1893.
For years, Australia's warmests have been advising the authorities that the danger posed to the country by global warming is not floods, but droughts.
Not too much rain, but too little.
One result in Brisbane was a relaxation of planning rules to allow building on areas vulnerable to flooding in the past.
In other words, floodplains were deregulated to allow people to build on them because of this global warming nonsense.
As long ago as 1999, this was seen as potentially disastrous by an expert Brisbane river flood study, which was ignored and even kept secret for years.
Instead of investing in its flood defenses, Australia spent 13, get this, $13 billion on desalination plants.
They spent $13 billion to convert seawater to freshwater because of the forecast droughts.
And now they're overrun with floods.
Last spring, Queensland's prime minister, the drought and warming-obsessed Anna Blige, ordered the water company not to allow any releases from the dam because water was such a precious resource that none must be wasted.
Classic.
What happens when you let liberals run things uncontrolled and unchecked?
And this kind of thing is going to continue to happen, ladies and gentlemen, as the years unfold before our very eyes.
And back to the phones we go to Matthews, North Carolina.
This is Neil.
Great to have you, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, how you doing?
Very well, sir.
Thank you.
Hey, listen, I've listened to you for about 20 years.
I don't play or watch golf, but after watching you on the Haney Project for just two times, two half an hour shows, I've learned more about you as a person than I have in all my 20 years of listening to you.
Oh, really?
Yeah.
Really?
Now, wait just a second.
Let's take this.
You actually said you listened to the program for 20 years, but after watching two 30-minute episodes of the Haney Project, you've learned more about me on those shows in 20 years on the radio.
Exactly.
I'll buy like what?
Well, you're a regular guy.
You've got vulnerabilities like the rest of us.
You just want to live your life as a regular person, and it just makes you know it makes you more real to me.
Well, that's fascinating.
I'm not being critical here.
Now, do not be intimidated.
Mind anything I'm saying here.
I'm just reacting here, stream of consciousness.
You only learned on the Haney Project or had it confirmed for you that I'm a real guy.
Yes.
That I have vulnerabilities.
Yes.
Especially the vulnerability part.
You don't hear any vulnerabilities on the radio show.
Well, when you have sayings like, don't doubt me, I mean, you even have it on your golf ball, which I think.
I do, yeah.
Don't doubt me is on the golf ball.
Yeah.
Yeah.
You know, my wife watched it with me, and she was fascinated.
She's listening to you on and off, and she thinks she just had a hoot watching you last night for the first time.
She especially liked those shorts that you're wearing.
Oh, yeah, those are the loudmouth shorts.
Yeah, yeah.
She had a good idea about those.
You know, you've got the EIB network.
Why don't you start a brand of shorts and call them the Excellence in Bermudas?
Well, that's already a pretty well-established brand to have to compete with.
But you can tell your, when most people ask me why you want vulnerability, here's vulnerability.
Why do you wear those shorts?
And I always tell them, if you had the face I have, you would wear anything to distract people's attention away from it.
That's vulnerability for you.
Yeah.
Well, I just think, I think it's...
Wendy is in here nodding her head, by the way, in agreement with that.
I think the show is just absolutely phenomenal.
I'm fascinated by it.
You come across when you're talking to Haney, you know, totally different than when you're on the radio.
Now, that's fascinating because I checked email this morning, and I found one, most of it's at home.
I didn't transfer here.
I found one email about the Haney Project show last night, and it was from somebody who said, I just don't believe how arrogant you are telling your coach what you will and won't do on this show.
You can't be serious about learning the game of telling your coach what you won't do.
Well, this person obviously has no sense of humor.
Well, I could tell you were just being, you know, one thing that always struck me about another thing that struck me about you is how honest you are.
You are just so blatantly honest.
I mean, he wanted you to go to the, he wanted you to go to the range.
And you said, I don't go to the range.
I don't do this for a living.
And, you know, I mean, most other people would have said, yeah, you know, I go to the range or whatever to try to play along, but you're totally honest with the guy.
Well, I did.
I told him I can play on the range.
I don't need any help there.
I need to learn how to play in the golf course.
Yeah, I had the same problem you did.
I would go to the range and hit a bunch of great balls.
And this is 25 years ago when I quit playing.
Then I'd go play nine holes or 18 holes with the buddy.
And the longer I played, the worse I got.
And if I didn't go to the range, I played better on the course.
See?
See, it's the amateur's lament.
Right.
It's absolutely true.
Well, look, I appreciate your comments.
Well, it's a great show.
And, you know, I just want to encourage everybody to watch it.
They're going to get a whole different take on Rush Limbaugh.
Hmm.
Interesting.
Interesting.
Well, if my wife tells me she's learned things about me on that show that she didn't know, then I'll think you've got something.
Jake, Rush.
All right.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Thanks, Neil, very much.
This is Vicki in Dallas.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Listen, when you played that, I believe it was Maxine Waters' clip of her standing up there and saying, oh, how people aren't going to get this and they're not going to get that.
Well, I happen to be an ER nurse, and I run the department.
And I'm telling you, people are not denied anything.
If they come to an ER, they don't have a primary.
We refer them to a primary.
We refer them to clinics they need to get to.
I watch my staff daily working their rear ends off to get people into the right place where they need to go.
If you need help, you get it.
I know.
In fact, this is...
I'm appalled.
It's a slap in my face.
It's a slap to everybody out there working the front lines on a daily basis.
I take offense to what she said.
I truly do.
This is one reason why people don't have insurance.
They know they can go to the emergency room anytime, and you people are going to take care of them as though they had money to pay for it.
We spend gazillions of dollars on people without money traumas.
I mean, you come through the door, and I've heard a lot of people say that, you know, the Arizona senator, she got special care.
Are you nuts?
Every, I work trauma units, and you get the same care with every person who walks through the door.
It's a trauma.
That's the point.
I'm glad you said that.
That is the point I made about this.
Only in this country, in whatever city that accident happened, could she get the best health care available.
Exactly.
In Canada, they'd have to come here for it most of the time.
Yes.
I mean, and EMSers take you to the right level one trauma to get the care that you need.
We didn't stand around going, hmm, let's check their wallet and see what they got in there.
Oh, that's that only happens in Democrat-produced television shows and movies.
Oh, my God.
By the way, the spokesman on that soundbite, that was Sheila Jackson Lee from your state.
She's from over in Houston.
Well, you know, running an ER and seeing how hard my staff works every day, we spend hours on referrals.
There are social workers that spend hours in the ER to make sure that these people get follow-ups.
I know.
Plus, you get to work with George Clooney.
A lot of people would love to have your job.
Well, we're too busy to even look at how cute he is.
I know.
It's a pop culture comment.
Look at, Vicki, I'm glad you called.
You're right on the money, and I'm glad you made it through.
I love your passion.
We got to be back right after this.
Don't go away.
Hi, and welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh.
I have to admit, I'm amused by this.
Probably very few other people are, but I am.
During our obscene profit timeout, I'm watching the news conference between President Obama and Chinese Chikom leader Hu Zhintao.
And I've not seen this before.
Hu Zhintao is speaking, speaking, and speaking with no translator.
They wait till he finishes.
And then they read what he says in total.
And of course, we don't know.
Translator could be making it all up.
Hu Zhintao could be telling us, who knows what he could be saying to us.
And translator is saying, we want to work together, two countries in the world.
China is developing country, America developed country, but not for long.
He didn't say that.
But I'm fascinated.
I'm listening to this.
I found myself trying to write down what Hu Zhintao was saying in Chinese.
Phonetically, so if I could repeat it to you.
Well, it looks like chicken scrolls.
I said, I wonder what, I wonder the people who can't speak English, what does it sound like to them?
Because when I hear Chinese or Japanese, it sounds like all the same word.
And I can't comprehend of anybody understanding it.
And of course, that's silly.
But he's sitting there, kicka kakaka, kiki.
Jo chi chaka pa ta bacha kiki.
Where does what they want?
Whoa!
Geekatu Tonla Goodhole!
Ziwakika-bada-bada king!
And I couldn't write down anymore.
I was losing track of because I'm looking up as he's saying all this, and they cut to Obama looking intently as though he understands every word of it, which what would you expect from the ruling class?
By the way, where's the print?
Where are we doing it?
Big news.
Ah, here it is.
ABC News, the note has this, as does thehill.com.
Democrat Representative Steve Cohen of Tennessee on the House floor Tuesday night compared Republican claims about the health care reform law to lies perpetrated by the Nazis that led to the Holocaust.
On the floor of the House, Democrat Steve Cohen, Tennessee, said they don't like the truth, so they summarily dismiss it.
They say it's a government takeover of health care, a big lie, just like Goebbels.
You say it enough, you repeat the lie, repeat the lie, repeat the lie, until eventually people believe it, like blood libel.
It's the same kind of thing.
The Germans said enough about the Jews and people believed it.
You have the Holocaust.
You tell a lie over and over again.
I'd like, how's that toning down the rhetoric going?
How's this new civility working out?
Now, there was no audience.
This was probably special orders last night.
So nobody was listening.
It was on C-SPAN, so effectively nobody heard it.
And I don't know.
That's a good question.
Which Republican is going to sit next to this guy during the State of the Union show?
But how's all this new civility working out for you?
And I'll bet you we don't have two days of hysterics about how horrible it is to use the term blood libel.
Of course, not because Cohen is Jewish, so he has free reign to use it.
So he just compared the Russians the Republicans to Nazis, to Joseph Goebbels.
Not one comment.
I mean, it's in the Hill.
ABC is the note, but there isn't any outrage over this.
What did I tell you, Cut 16?
You got to hear this.
This is ruling class member David Frum, who what would be the most descriptive and honest way to describe David Frum?
David Frum remains a guest on Democrat talk shows because he wrote a phrase for a George Bush speech during the first term.
It is said that David Frum came up with the slogan, Axis of Evil.
So David Frum wrote three words, and for that, he has guest emeritus status.
Well, that, plus he frequently rips conservatives.
He's from the Reagan is overcrowd, era of Reagan is overcrowd.
So he was on a television network not to be named last night, and he was asked about something that Newt Gingrich said.
It doesn't really matter what he was asked.
It's his answer.
Basically, the question was, what do you think is Gingrich's consideration here?
Is he trying to get an edge on a possible rival?
I do think that there is a lot of concern in senior levels of the Republican Party.
People in that kind of orbit are worried about the down ballot effect of a Palin candidacy.
2012 is shaping up to be a very good year for Republicans in senatorial races.
It may be in the Republican interest to have 2012 be a rather lower intensity year rather than a higher intensity year.
If a lower intensity year, if you're going to lose the presidency anyway, but your more educated, older, more affluent voters are coming out as a bigger part of the electorate, then you can have even bigger gains in the Senate.
That, by the way, in tone, is the new civility.
That is ruling class speak.
But what he's saying here is that establishment Republicans, if Palin's anywhere near the presidential candidacy, she's anywhere near this run, that that's just too divisive to try to beat Obama in 2012.
May as well just cede the presidential election in 2012 and try to pick up a few Senate seats, is what the erudite and brilliant ruling class, I don't know if he's a member or want to be, David Frum suggests.
It's just going to be too volatile.
Beating Obama, especially if Palin's around, not possible.
Just don't even think about doing that.
Just go for the down ballot wins and forget the presidency.
And he says that there's a lot of concern in senior levels of the Republican Party people in that kind of orbit are worried about the down ballot effect of a Palin candidacy.
So it's a great year.
In other words, the Republican leadership, we got a great chance to pick up Senate seats, not so much the presidency.
Let's not even really focus on that.
We'll just seed that.
Now, I don't know that that's true.
I don't know that that's the establishment Republican view, but this is what the exalted, celebrated, erudite ruling class member David Frum says.
Just FYI.
Since last summer, last summer, I had a meeting with some people from Envoy Medical.
They came in.
I've never seldom, never, but I have seldom seen new clients, new advertisers as excited about their new product as these guys were.
This is a hearing aid, but it's not a hearing aid.
Don't even think of it as that.
I mean, that will tell you what it does, but that's not the way to think about this.
They call it the ESTEAM hearing restoration method.
And it's not a hearing aid.
It is a prosthetic inner ear stimulator.
It does not use a speaker.
It doesn't use a microphone.
It eliminates the need for hearing aids.
What the ESTEAM does is use your natural eardrum.
Their invention has found a way to use the eardrum to operate, to amplify sounds entering the inner ear.
It's a surgical implant.
It's invisible.
No one will know that you had a hearing loss.
It is revolutionary.
Now, it doesn't work for people like me who are totally deaf.
You have to have some residual hearing and then do the examination to find out if it's meant for you, if you're a candidate for it or not.
But the people who've had this done swear by it.
It has renewed a lease on life for them.
I've spoken with a couple of ESTEAM implant recipients.
One of them said that hearing aids are just that, an aid.
With this thing, my doctor was able to treat my hearing loss, and now I'm cured.
My hearing loss has been cured.
It's not been doctored up, papered over, amplified, or what have you.
And every time I talk about this, I can't tell you the number of people who send me notes about it.
What is the name of that thing again?
What is it?
What is it?
Esteem?
Yep, it's ESTEA, but the website is envoymedical.com, E-N-V-O-Y, envoymedical.com, or you can call them 800-518-7320, 800-518-7320.
Go to their website, find a list of side effects and benefits associated with ESTEAM, and visit their website.
Find out what it does.
Find out if it's for you.
And if it is, you're going to think it's near miraculous.
Your guiding light, Rush Limbaugh, mind over chatter on the EIB network.
And we go to Los Angeles.
Hello, Scott.
Great to have you with us, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, how are you?
Good.
Good.
Hey, with the Democrats wanting to sit amongst the Republicans at the State of the Union dress, I was thinking how bad this would be for people like myself who will be watching it at home alone.
And Obama's going to say something, ideally, that I'm not going to agree with.
And when I look at the television, I'm not going to see a bunch of people, elected officials, that I feel represent me because the entire audience will have people standing up throughout it.
And I think it's going to alienate every single person who's not agreeing with the president and tries to see that there's a group of congress people who relate to my thinking.
Well, you have a point, but the way things are going, I don't know that there's any really profound opposition to what Obama's saying, the Republicans are going to display it anyway.
Given the new tone, given the call here for new civility.
But your point is well taken.
You're basically warning people, Tea Party types, hey, you're going to get depressed during the State of the Union show.
I'm going to get really depressed.
And you're warning people are going to get depressed if this sitting together thing actually happens.
It's a bad idea.
I've called the Congress people and left messages.
This is like Lucy saying to the blockhead Charlie Brown, I'm not going to move the football this time.
I'm going to go ahead and hold it, and you're going to be able to kick it.
And Charlie Brown falls for it, just like that healthcare debate.
Well, that is the exact purpose of this.
And when the night is over, if what you say, if what you foresee happens, the media reaction will be, see, there aren't any Tea Party people here in Washington.
Yeah.
There aren't any Tea Party people here.
And that's the whole night is going to be designed to dispirit Tea Party people.
Make no mistake about it.
You're absolutely right about that.
It's going to be destructive.
Well, but don't let it be since you know that's going to be the case.
I know it's the case, and I will still look up there.
And the problem is the rhetoric from the left media will come afterwards and talk about what a great speech it was.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And as much as I say I'm not going to want to get depressed about it, it is going to be all over the news the next couple of days.
And I think it's a bad idea.
And if there's any way that people could call their congresspeople and suggest against this, I want to see somebody who relates the same way I do to this president.
And that is sitting down when he says something that is absolutely ridiculous.
He's absolutely right, folks.
Scott, Los Angeles, absolutely right.
That's the exact purpose.
Wonder if Obama will refrain from attacking the Supreme Court this time.
They might not show up.
Speaking of people that might not be there, Supreme Court might not show up.
Scott, thank you much for the phone call.
I appreciate it.
Hu Jintao gave Obama a lesson.
And by the way, what did I tell you?
I told you mere moments ago that when you hear the whole subject of human rights brought up, I told you how to react.
When they start talking about mutual respect and so forth, when Hu Zhintao starts saying that that just means shut up about our human rights abuses.
Just shut up about it.
So this actually happened.
Audio sound by 29 here.
During the QA, Bloomberg TV White House correspondent Hans Nichols said to who, I was wondering if we could get an answer to that question on human rights.
Also on Capitol Hill, Harry Reid, John Boehner not attending the state dinner.
Many on Capitol Hill see China as a threat.
What can you do to allay their fears?
This was the answer from Hu Zhintao.
I did not hear the question about the human rights.
What I know was that he was asking a question directed at President Obama.
As you raised this question and I heard the question properly, certainly I'm in a position to answer that question.
But I'm not going to.
I didn't hear the question on human rights besides you asked that of Obama.
I'm in a position to answer, but I'm not going to.
Now, here in the next answer, Hu Zhintao says that the CHICOMs are committed to human rights and warns the U.S. to stay out of their business.
China is always committed to the protection and promotion of human rights.
China recognizes and also respects the universality of human rights.
And at the same time, we do believe that we also need to take into account the different national circumstances when it comes to the universal value of human rights.
Though there are disagreements between China and the United States on the issue of human rights, China is willing to engage in dialogue and exchanges with the United States on the basis of mutual respect and the principle of non-interference in each other's internal affairs.
He told us to go to hell.
He told the media to go to hell.
He told Obama to go to hell.
We have a different version of human rights than you do.
Our version is one child per family.
If they try that, they're dead.
Our version of human rights is they get in the way of our tanks, we run them down.
Our version of human rights is if they're to Fulun Gong, they go to a labor camp.
Our version is if they're from Tibet, we're going to kick the crap out of them.
What are you going to do about it?
You got your own problems.
And in this guy, Hu Zhintao could say, look, we've had meetings with your people, and they've told us you have your own human rights violation.
That did happen.
That's how the Obama regime does it.
Finally, what can you do to allay the fears of Republicans and others who are not coming to the state dinner tonight?
For 31 as for the latter question about the attendance of the state dinner by some congresspeople as to who will attend and who will not attend and for what reasons, I think President Obama is certainly in a better position to answer that question.
So here's the Chikom leader.
I didn't hear the question on human rights.
Ask Obama.
What?
Who's coming?
Who's not?
I don't want to go either.
I'm happy for the honor, but ask Obama why they're not showing up.
Not my problem, just more food for me.
All right, that wraps up another exciting excursion into broadcast excellence.
One thing for human rights activists, know this.
The Chikoms have a Nobel Prize winner.
I guess a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
They have him locked up in jail.
Imagine if we had Al Gore locked up in jail.
▲
Export Selection