All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 12, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:32
January 12, 2011, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ah, Jesus.
I knew it no matter what I do.
Happy birthday to you.
No matter how many admonitions.
Happy birthday to you.
There you are, sir.
Uh, it's a birthday cake that has been presented here just now.
And that does look like chocolate covered strawberries, your favorite.
To tell you, they look like Sherry Berry strawberries on top of a chocolate.
What kind of cake is it?
It's chocolate icing, I know.
Chocolate cake with chocolate with your chocolate cake.
So you got your favorite.
Yeah.
You got your favorite chocolate cake.
Well, the Dawn got her own favorite cake here.
She knows I don't.
Well, that's a sweet card.
Where is Snerdly, by the way?
He's still not back in town, right?
What do we know when he's going to get back?
Tomorrow.
Supposedly back tomorrow.
That's really cool.
Come back the day after my birthday.
All right.
There's uh I'll make a wish.
Gotta make a wish for you to blow out the candles.
Three, two.
Barely got the second one out.
There you have it.
Thank you all very much.
And thanks to all of you.
I've been I've been inundated with happy birthday email wishes all week long.
I mean a number in the tens of thousands.
And I appreciate it.
I uh I really do.
Welcome back, Rushlin Baugh.
This is the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
The telephone numbers 800-282-2882 and the email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
If you doubt, and I know you don't, but if anybody does doubt that the Democrats are trying to use this tragedy to stop the Republicans, here is a story from Talking Points Memo, D.C. It's one of their favorite blogs.
Representative Bob Brady, Democrat Pennsylvania, doesn't just think things like putting bullseyes on your political opponents is in poor taste.
He thinks it should be illegal.
In the wake of the Arizona shooting spree, he's introducing legislation to extend prote This is all irrelevant.
It is literally irrelevant.
None of these political advertisements, whoever ran them, with bullseyes or targets crosshairs had anything to do with this.
In fact, there is no evidence that such ads had anything to do with any act of violence.
The real questions now are about Sheriff Dupnik.
It is being learned the Arizona, Arizona newspaper, Arizona Republic has uh uh made it clear here that the Sheriff's Department and the community college in Pima County know a lot more about the shooter than they are willing to release.
They know a lot more.
They have a file on the guy that they're not willing to release.
The real focus of this story ought to be how utter lies have been told, told by the political left, in order to advance a political agenda, not these ads, websites that this guy never saw.
It's it's it's it's look, it's ridiculous anyway, even if he had seen them.
It doesn't.
If if if if every allegation they're making had any basis in fact, these shootings would be occurring every day.
And they would have been occurring for a long time.
Now back to Bob Brady, Democrat Pennsylvania.
In the wake of the Arizona shooting spree, he's introducing legislation to extend protection given to the President of the United States to members of Congress.
Brady isn't the only member proposing new legislation or specific changes to the discourse after Saturday's events.
Representative Jim Cleyburn, Democrat South Carolina, is backing a return to the fairness doctrine.
And Representative Charlie Pingry, a Democrat from Maine, is calling on Republicans to change the name of the repealing the job-killing health care law act.
That's what the Republicans have named the health care repeal bill, repealing the job-killing health care law act.
And Charlie Pingry of Maine is calling on Republicans to change the name.
Take job killing out of it.
It's just uh over the top uh reactionary insanity from these people.
I I I I look at this and look at the Sarah Palin business.
Sarah Palin's found a way now to make herself part of the story, to put herself at the top of the story.
That's an ABC's news in the note.
By the way, Bob Beckle, who's uh commentator on Fox.
I saw him claim the other night that uh he's the guy who invented using bullseyes on congressional districts.
Now, these are the same people, by the way, who are totally in favor of letting people burn the American flag.
They're totally in favor of this.
Somehow, though, that's not going to incite any behavior that uh that these people would condemn.
They just don't think it would.
So I'm looking for this Arizona Republic story that I thought I had left right here on the top of my stack, and I did.
I know what I know what happened to it.
I misplaced it when they brought the birthday cake in here.
Because I had it right here at the top of the stack.
There's an Arizona Republic story.
It's at Azcentral.com, and it's got details on how the newspaper's tried to get the sheriff of Pima County and the community college to release the file that they have on Jared Lochner, and they will not do so.
And I had it right here, and I know I didn't throw it away.
Oh, well, there's other news out there, and during the next break I'll find it because uh, and we want to get to your phone calls pretty quickly, too.
Uh, because it's uh it it's time to turn the tables on all of this.
This is diversionary stuff to try to blame it all on Palin or right-wing media or what have you.
Here is uh CNBC.com as the economy revs back to life.
Why is it revving back the life?
What is the evidence it's revving back to life?
Jobs?
What is it?
I don't know.
Well, they say it is.
As the economy revs back to life with signs of hiring on the horizon.
Oh, I got okay.
Signs of hiring way out there on the horizon equals the economy revving back to life.
The housing market's being left behind like Macaulay Culkin in Home Alone, they say.
So we've got this great recovery going on, but we got no jobs being created, and we've got a plummeting housing market.
But the economy's revving back to life.
In the past few years, we've all been careful to choose our words carefully, Cindy Perman here writing the story.
In the past few years, we've all been careful to choose our words carefully, not calling it a recession until it fit the technical definition and avoiding any inappropriate use of the D-word depression.
Really?
They've been that careful about it.
I think they were talking about recession while Bush was still in office.
They were talking about the coming recession.
They were talking about, oh, they tried to convince people we were in a recession the last two years of the Bush administration.
Things were bad, Cindy Perman says, but the broader economy never reached depression territory.
Housing market, on the other hand, just crossed that threshold.
Home values have fallen 26% since their peak in June of 2006.
That's worse than the 25.9% decline seen during the depression years between 1928 and 193.
November marked the 53rd consecutive month, that's four and a half years that home values have fallen.
That's most people's number one asset.
What's worse, it's not over yet.
Home values are expected to continue to slide as inventories pile up and likely won't recover until the job market improves.
A small matter.
A small matter.
Housing market, small matter here while the uh while the Libs advance their blood libel.
It's nothing really, folks.
The left is not concerned here.
Uh housing market.
No, they need to fundraise, smear, distract.
Whatever they can, so they can put the news of their economic policies on the back burner.
They have to make sure that they do everything they can to keep the devastating reality of their policies off the front page.
And so willing accomplices like the sheriff come along and the media come along to accuse Sarah Palin and me and Levin, everybody.
Hannity.
Now this news, the housing market slipping into depression territory, probably will not get the Democrats' attention because they're politicizing the mortgage market and failed stimulus bill caused and advanced the problem.
So instead, we're going to get character assassination and hearty congratulations for an incompetent partisan sheriff.
Anything we can do to keep the truth of Democrat policies off the front pages.
Okay, we're back, Rush Lindbaugh, and to the phones we go as promised.
I found the Arizona Republic's door.
We'll get to it here in just a second.
But people have been patiently waiting.
Hello.
Thank you, Rush.
I think we need to consider in this whole debate the fact that the Democrats are really sensitive to word usage.
If you call their party anything other than what they want you to call it, Democrat, Democratic, whatever, we can bring them to tears.
I think talk radio, if anything, is bringing down the likelihood of any violence in this country simply because we're able to discuss and...
And uh vent and somewhat give somewhat some control over our lives, or at least the feeling of that.
We're on the other hand, in the the uh health care debate for a whole year that the public was telling this administration it did not want Obamacare, yet it was forced it on us uh over all that ejection, and they're consequently the public feels a loss of control over their lives, uh which might, I would think, increase likelihood of violence if anything does.
Well, and that's an excellent point, and and I want to stress again that that is by design, creating this kind of chaos, uh, an unsettledness, uh, a lack of confidence about people's lives and futures is exactly the purpose here.
This is what the leftist seeks to do.
This is the one of the prime uh ingredients of the recipe to grow government.
You set government up as the solution to all these problems that government causes.
Have you ever noticed that whenever government does something that's wrong, big big boondoggle, what's the solution?
Another government program to fix it.
Big government's always the solution to government excess, to government uh mistakes.
And the uh, you know, uh I I've always maintained, I remember when I started this program, uh, I I was I got a great piece of advice once back in Sacramento when I was hired to to do essentially my first real talk show, the way I wanted to do it.
The consultant who found me and hired me said, we will, you know, we don't mind controversy as long as it's genuine.
You really believe something, can back it up, we'll back you up.
But if you're just gonna get on the radio and say outrageous designed solely to make people mad, things that you don't believe.
If your purpose is just to get notice, just to say the most outrageous thing you can, sorry, we don't want any part of that, and we're not gonna back you up.
It's not that I had a tendency to do that, it's just that this was a policy being explained to me.
And it also turned out to be great advice, because essentially it was just be honest, be passionate, be honest, and we'll we'll back you up.
All points of view were heard on the station.
I mean, it had everything from carrot cake recipes to biased news in the morning presented by a bunch of liberals to, you name it, it had everything.
Well, diversity was covered throughout the busy broadcast day.
And I've never forgotten that.
And I also, when I started this program back in 1988, I knew what we were trying to do.
We're trying to get radio stations all over the country to cover, to take, to broadcast the program.
And I knew that there was gonna be resistance to it at uh many of the radio stations.
Because back then, in 1988, the mantra for radio was it's gotta be local.
Talk radio particularly has to be local with local issues and local phone numbers and local hosts, because people outside the community or in the community didn't care what was happening outside the community.
It couldn't care less.
And so I knew that if uh if I was impolite to callers that I would have a short lifespan on stations because even after the program was was accepted on some stations, I knew that that, and I was told in some cases that uh people were laying in wait on the station for any excuse they could to cancel it because they didn't want it there in the first place.
So being an insulk guy, which some hosts had popularized back then and private previous years prior to it, I knew would not work.
So be polite, be honest, don't be controversial for the sake of it, and it's always been my basic operating procedure.
And I've always said that no radio program, which, as this one's been accused of, as you know for 22 years being built on hate.
Remember now, hate speech is simply anything that disagrees with Democrats.
Anything that disagrees with liberalism, they categorize it as hate speech.
So I've always said that no radio show built on hate could ever survive.
It could not be a business success, first and foremost.
It would not attract and hold an audience.
It certainly would not become large enough, long enough to become profitable.
It was simply a losing proposition, the way I was trying to do this.
And it turned out to be true.
I've always counted the notion that there's hate on this program by this one.
Well, it's it's not possible.
There has been a radio network pop-up that tried the exact opposite.
Say whatever you have to say, outrageous as it can be, whether you believe it or not, filled with disgusting hate.
It was called Air America, and look how long it lasted.
I mean, even liberals who share the same hateful points of view did not find it worth listening to.
Because they weren't hearing anything different than what they saw and experienced during their humdrum daily lives.
So the whole notion that conservative talk radio is filled with hate and so forth is baseless because it wouldn't work.
There's no way it could become profitable, and no way it could remain a business success.
And by the way, all the people accusing me and people who do what I do of being filled with hate, they know all of this.
They know everything they're saying about this program and me is a bunch of lies.
They know it.
Doesn't matter.
Their effort is not based in truth.
It is their agenda that inspires and propels and motivates them.
And that agenda is simply get rid of any opposition.
They've tried every which way they can think of to compete, to exist alongside, to beat what have you, they can't even come close.
And the reasons are hilariously obvious.
Yet they can't figure them out.
And they're rooted, the reasons that they are imminent failures is that they have not one scintilla of understanding of how free markets work.
Air America, for example, started out as a bunch of hateful, angry people who had no experience in radio.
Because the people who listen to this program think it's not a radio show, this is a political show.
Somebody found me.
I'm some great political entertainer or what have you, so they got to combat me with their own campaign network.
They thought this radio program exists as a campaign arm of conservatism of the Republican Party.
That's what they thought they had to set up.
those people.
But they understand that what they're saying about conservative media is not true, but it doesn't matter.
They're still going to try to convince as many people of it as possible.
And the only people they can convince are the people who don't listen.
The people who do listen know how baseless these allegations are.
So the effort of Media Matters and all these other so-called watchdogs is to try to keep people who don't listen from listening because they think they're going to they already know what happens on this program without having to listen to it.
It's amazing those people who do find this program or others.
It's amazing how light bulbs go off in their heads.
Well, this is not at all what I thought it was.
This is not at all what they told me it was.
And that's the biggest threat that these people face because everything they've said about us, conservatives, conservatives in the media, you name it.
Everything they have said about Republicans conservatives for the most part is a lie to one degree or another.
They live in the greatest fear that all that's going to be exposed as lies.
So you have an event like this in Arizona.
Okay, go to page whatever it is in the playbook shows us what to do here.
It's no different than what happened in the Oklahoma City bombing, and that is politicize this.
And we've got we've got templates here of saying these people are hateful, they inspire violence and so forth, so we got violence that took place out there.
Let's go blame this on Palin.
Let's go blame this on whoever we think are the uh most threatening conservatives of the moment.
Which is why, after eight years of Bush being responsible for everything, he's not a threat anymore.
He's gone, so he doesn't exist in their minds.
Now it's Palin.
We'll be back after this.
Sheriff's Department and community college officials in Pima County are refusing to release a wide range of public documents about the man charged in Saturday's shooting rampage that left six dead and more than a dozen wounded.
The Pima County Sheriff's Department, that's Clarence Dupnik, and Pima County Community College have declined to release documents that could shed light on run-ins they had with 22-year-old Jared Lofner in the nine months or um, I'm sorry, the months prior to the shooting.
The Arizona Public Records law requires that records be open to inspection by any person at all times, unless officials can prove releasing the information would violate rights of privacy or confidentiality or otherwise harm the best interests of the state.
The Arizona Republic requested those records, including incident reports on campus and calls for dispatch of deputies to Lofner's home, be released under the law.
Such reports are often released as a matter of course in criminal cases.
College officials have not indicated when or if they will release the information, saying that they want prior approval from the FBI, and they're concerned about violating federal laws protecting the privacy of student information.
On Monday, the Arizona Republic requested copies of any reports from the Pima County Sheriff's Department involving contacts with Laufner or calls to his house.
The Pima County deputy Renee Carlson said her office would not release the reports without a specific date, though that's not required by state statute.
Carlson said providing these documents would be tantamount to releasing criminal history.
Carlson said she couldn't speculate on the nature of any calls for service regarding Laufner.
She also said no calls or incidents involve threats by Laufner.
The Republic also requested the names of the people wounded in Saturday's shooting.
The Sheriff's Department's not released any names, although names of several victims have emerged in media reports.
The Sheriff's Department did not provide a reason for withholding the list.
So I wonder when the president called Sheriff Dupner.
Dupnick to uh congratulate him if he congratulated him on his transparency and his uh responsibilities to the public.
Call him up and say, hey DuPnik, hell of a job, babe.
Back to the phones, Terry Alaska.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Thanks, Rush, and happy birthday.
Thank you very much.
It's so great to be able to talk to you on your birthday.
That's pretty cool.
I just wanted to make a quick point here.
That these are the same people that have been telling us for years that you were nothing more than an entertainer and that you were not to be taken seriously, and that you're just a you know, this, you know, they kind of downplay you and discount you, and and it's really insulting my intelligence here.
This whole thing.
Because on one hand, now we're supposed to think, you know, it it's so inflammatory what the what they're doing here.
And then, you know, it wasn't that long ago that you know, I've been, you know, I I watched, you know, different things on TV and laugh you off as if you were nothing to be taken seriously, and this is just a you know, your money-making gig that doesn't, you know, that doesn't mean anything.
Right, right, right, right.
Just an entertainer, not to be taken seriously, you're exactly right.
It's amazing how that's a fluid description that changes from issue to issue based on how the media seeks to have me uh portrayed.
Yeah, they're truly insulting our intelligence here.
Well, they are.
This is uh really they're they are in the minority here as far as election results, polls indicate they are in the minority.
And in the process, they're like you feel insulted.
Everybody who listens to the program feels insulted.
Everybody who watches Fox News feels insulted.
Doesn't stop them.
They continue with this whole diatribe.
Uh Sheriff Dupnik appeared on MSNBC with Chris Matthews last night.
Chris Matthews played sound bites of me, trying to rile up the sheriff.
Uh we have some of the examples of this.
Uh this is before the interview with the sheriff, Matthews played this soundbite from this program yesterday.
Sheriff Clarence Dupnick is on uh the path here of attempting now to expressly personally associate me with this event.
We have a law enforcement officer, the sheriff of that county, admitting he's got no facts for what he's speculating about.
I don't know, maybe Pima County would have been better served by a real sheriff, one who spent his time trying to lock up nutbags and criminals rather than finding ways to excuse them.
He hasn't pointed out a single thing that I have said that would inspire such a heinous act.
So Matthews then says to the sheriff, Looks like you got old ill Rushbow riled up here, Sheriff.
Let me ask you about what you make of that.
Did you know you would open up a Hornet's nest from uh right radio?
What what do you make of it?
Do you think there's a connection between the atmospherics, the hatred of government you hear every day on the radio, the hatred of Obama you hear on the right wing, the language you hear all the time, that they're evil, they're taking over the country with socialism, etc.
etc.
Do you think that had anything whatever to do with this person's behavior in this tragedy?
What a setup.
What a lead-in question.
All the hatred, the hatred for Obama.
No, Chris, it's called love of country.
I know.
This is this is just it's despicable.
It's called Love.
Chris, you're better than this.
This is the thing.
You what a descent you have made from the days I first met this guy.
You know, it was Chris Matthews when Bill Clinton told the racist joke about me at the White House Correspondent Center, who came up to me when it was over and said, You're not the Rush Limbo I know if you let that stand.
You can't you can't let the President he was he was really animated.
You can't let the President of the United States call you a racist.
You can't do this, and that's that's beyond the bad.
outrageous to hornet's nest Atmospheric hatred of government that you hear every day of hatred of government, love of country, Chris.
Anyway, you heard the setup.
Here is Sheriff Clarence Ducknick.
There's no doubt in my mind.
Particularly troubled personalities, which is what we're dealing with here, are very vulnerable to the emotion that comes out, especially anger, hate, paranoia, and so forth.
You talk about crosshairs on Gabby Gifford's.
Well, I want to tell you that her opponent, who was heartily endorsed, very vocally by Sarah Palin, had an event, a fundraising Event where the people were invited, I think, to a barbecue or something after the barbecue.
If they wanted to, they could each come up and fire an automatic rifle, a semi-automatic rifle.
And the same individual had hundreds of campaign ads, starting out by saying, are you as mad at Washington?
Boy, I want to tell you, I sure am.
Sheriff Sheriff Stowetta, you were asked about me.
What do you want to keep bringing Sarah Palin into this for?
I'm gonna start getting a complex here.
Matthews set him up to talk about me, and DuPnik started talking about Sarah Palin again.
Are you mad at Washington?
Uh uh, what is Sheriff?
What is the difference in people's anger at Washington and your anger at talk radio people?
Why is your anger justified, Sheriff, even though it is baseless when people's anger at government makes total sense based on what they believe and what they see this government doing to the economy of this country?
Why is your hatred always justified, Sheriff?
Whatever you have animosity for.
You know, do you know that Sheriff Joe Arpayo was lynched and decapitated?
A doll or whatever, whatever you call it, effigy.
Joe Arpayo was decapitated in Pima County.
And Sheriff Dupnik didn't say anything about that.
Sarah Palin has been hung in effigy in West Hollywood on Halloween.
I don't remember anybody worried about whatever violence that might cause.
is Dupnik, in fact, Sheriff, you know, it sounds to me like you're trying to whip up some deranged people into some action here.
Sheriff, it doesn't sound to me like you're doing much to calm people down.
You're sounds to me like you're doing a damn good job of really revving people up, Sheriff, as I listened to these sound bites of yours.
Well, as you heard it, Clarence didn't take the bait.
Obama, or Matthews, I'm sorry, wanted him to talk about me and the evil of government, a taking over the country, Hornet's nest of right wing radio, and the sheriff did a 180 back to Sarah Palin.
So Matthews played another soundbite of me.
Try to get the sheriff to stay on topic.
And uh this is the uh this is the bite talking about Mark Penn on Matthew's own show.
Powerful Democrats wished for this.
It happened on Chris Matthews' show.
Powerful Democrats wished for this as a means of an opportunity for the president to shore up his sagging base, poll numbers or what have you.
Voila.
In two months' time, we have a nutcase opening fire in Tucson, Arizona, and lo and behold, leading Democrats are conducting strategy sessions with the president on how he can use the right words to maximize this event.
Either one lay this on me or Palin when we have nothing to do with it.
Yet leading Democrats actually hoped for this.
Interesting conspiracy theory, isn't it?
So Matthews then said this about me and my remarks that Democrats hoped for an event like this in Tucson.
If you're a conspirable nut, I guess so.
Mark Penn, who is a centrist, not a man of the left by any stretched imagination, was on this program not talking about how the left can settle scores with the right after a tragedy, but how if anything like that were to happen, how the president could be a peacemaker, how he could be a man of the center, and like Clinton was after Oklahoma City.
Not how the left could get even with the right or could exploit it to hurt the right, but how to calm things down.
It was a totally different proposal.
In fact, it wasn't even a proposal, it was a statement of what might happen if it did happen.
It wasn't a conspiracy plan like Rushbow is alleging for his full mooners out there.
Hey, Chris, come on, man.
We all heard what Mark Penn said.
He was talking about how Obama needed an event like that for the opportunity to reconnect with the American people.
He didn't sing about Centrism.
He was hoping for another, and he sarc he cited the event, Oklahoma City.
That event helped Clinton.
And don't forget, Chris, you're so so somebody on your side after 9-11 happened lamented that this didn't happen when Clinton was president, that this doofus Bush benefits from 9-11 by having an opportunity at greatness here.
So, Chris, we heard what Penn said, but we couple that with knowing how you people on the left think.
And we are validated because the event has happened, and you guys cannot restrain yourselves.
Your focus on this event is the right wing.
Your focus on this shooting for four days has been on how right wingers are responsible for this.
And you're doing everything you can to create mindsets with your full mooners into believing that that's actually what made this happen.
Then he brings old Clarence back into the conversation to get Clarence's take on this, and Clarence denounces the nut people in radio.
I would ask the question, which political party is benefiting from anger at the government.
Well, I suppose the Republican Party this year, right?
So therefore, and uh therefore I anticipate that uh the uh nut people in the uh radio, some of the nut people I should say, in the radio business and the TV business are gonna continue to inflame the public with hatred until after 2012.
Uh now this, in order to believe this, you have to believe that those of you who voted Republican did so because you were made to hate government by us.
That you weren't smart enough to realize that they rammed a health care law down your throat that you told them you didn't want, that you didn't want all this spending, you didn't want all of this indebtedness, you didn't want all this generational theft.
You didn't want the government owning car companies.
You didn't want the government printing money.
You didn't want all of this economic destruction.
You didn't want the stimulus bill.
No, even though you didn't want all, you were totally prepared to pull the lever for Democrats again until I came along, until uh nut people on the radio came along.
Well, political party benefiting from anger at the government.
It's Mars Venus, you'd have to say.
And we gotta take a brief time out.
We'll do that.
We'll come right back after this.
Don't go away.
By the way, Mark Penn was working for Clinton as a pollster during the Oklahoma City bombing, a real centrist, right?
That's what Matthew said.
Mark Penn is a centrist.
Uh, he worked for Hillary during her presidential run.
Mark Penn is married to Nancy Jacobson.
Nancy Jacobs is one of the founders of the No Labels Group.
A bunch of displaced Democrats.
Mark Penn was basically forced out of the Hillary campaign in 2008 because he wanted to go much more negative against Obama, and nobody had the uh guts to do it.
Let's go back and listen to what Mark Penn said on Matthew's show, November 4th of 2010 about what Obama needs to have to happen to help him turn things around.
President Clinton reconnected to Oklahoma.
And the presidents removed.
And it wasn't until that speech that he re-clicked with the American public.
Obama needs a similar company.
Obama needs a similar Oklahoma City bombing.
He didn't say Obama needs to wait around for something like that to happen and then go and he said Obama needs.
They got it.
And guess who's giving a speech tonight that becomes the breathless anticipation of the media?
Obama.
That's their real focus today.
What will he say?
Will he pull it all together?
Will he get it all back?
Will Obama once again take control of the country because of the actions of talk radio leading to what happened in Arizona?
They are so hoping Obama follows the template and dumps on Palin.
So hoping that.
By the way, which party benefited from anger at the government in 2006-2008?
Sheriff Dupnik.
Which party was just livid at government.
Which party featured leaders hoping this nation would lose the war in Iraq.
Sheriff Dupner.
Or Dupnik.
What is it?
Dupnik.
Gotta think beat.
I gotta think Beaton.
I gotta think Beatnik to remember this.
Which party was it that wanted us to lose an Dupnik.
Beatnik Dupnik, right?
Which party was it that wanted to lose a war?
It was Sheriff Dupnik's party.
The Democrats.
That's who he was hoping would lose a war.
And don't forget, Audio Soundbite number three, one of the shooters' best friends on Good Morning America Today.
He did not watch TV, he disliked the news, he didn't listen to political radio, he didn't take sides, he wasn't on the left, he wasn't on the right.
And we are back, and uh the fastest three hours in media heading on down the tracks, uh already two in the can, and just one remaining.
And uh people are asking what you what what birthday is this?
Number sixty uh today, ladies and I it I tell you, I've always said every year I get older, life gets better, and it's still true.
I am not yet to the point of saying, okay, I've maxed out.
Every year life keeps getting better.
▲
Export Selection