All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 20, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:43
December 20, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, here's the latest Michael Moore is now denying that Cuba banned Sicko because of mythical representations of their health care system there.
Michael Moore claiming that diplomats, U.S. diplomats, made up the story to discredit him.
But since this information was from secret diplomatic cables, and we would have never heard a word about this if it weren't for WikiLeaks, this is obviously untrue.
We also know that Michael Moore and the truth are strangers, and they have been for the longest time.
And I find it kind of funny here that Michael Moore donates $20,000 to get Assange bailed out, and Assange WikiLeaks nail Moore's lies big time on that movie Sicko.
Hi, folks, welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh and the EIV network.
Happy to have you along.
Fastest three hours in media.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882.
People in the email are asking me if I'm going to touch on what's been happening on the news networks regarding me and this no labels bunch.
And we do have some soundbites on it, so I think I will touch on it.
There.
I just touched on it.
Now, let's go ahead and do it.
Let's start Sunday morning, meet the press.
During the roundtable, David Gregory spoke with one of the co-founders of No Labels, Mark McKinnon and Joe Scarborough about the No Labels movement and me.
Gregory said, Mark, you've been accused of childish magical thinking.
That was Frank Rich in the New York Times today.
The idea that the heavy lifting of moving the country forward could be accomplished by a no-labels group is to many on the left and the right just unthinkable.
We've had a great success already because we brought together the harsh partisans on the left and the harsh partisans on her right, Rush Limbaugh, Frank Rich.
They're all attacking us because they think it's magical thinking when Corey Booker works with Governor Christie working together for solutions.
They don't want that because it doesn't help their ratings.
It doesn't help their profits.
Come on, McKinnon, you're supposed to be...
Aw, jeez.
He's supposed to be some media wizard.
This has nothing to do with ravings or profits for crying up.
Now that answered, that disappoints me.
This guy is not half of what his billing is.
I mean, that is just, that's too easy.
Ravings and profits somehow.
No labels group is somehow going to affect profits or ratings?
No, this is about common sense.
If anybody's concerned about profits and ratings, it's you guys in no labels trying to come up with political clients.
You're out of it.
All this is a very simple, folks.
Who got shellacked in the last election?
Liberals.
So what are they trying to do?
Change their name again.
They're not liberals.
No, we're just a bunch of no labels people.
We don't believe in labels.
We want civil discourse.
What's wrong with civil discourse?
What you're doing is taking the passion out of whatever it is.
Well, you're not taking the passion out.
You're trying to get away with your passion by saying it is not labeled.
Here's more on this.
This is from the same show.
Gregory said, well, Joe, what about devil's advocate time here?
Which is, why don't we recognize that politics is not a dirty game?
That people do have deeply held ideological views and differences.
And that, I mean, look what happened in the Republican Party.
It's become more conservative because a lot of Republicans thought, and even independents, that it got away from basic principles.
You have Frank Rich on the left enraged by what Mark's doing, Rush Limbaugh on the right enraged.
And they have the luxury of never actually governing, never being a president, never being a senator, never being in Congress, realizing that you actually have to, at the end of the day, sit down and deal with people across the aisle.
We govern in the middle.
We always have.
See, I snerkly, a lot of people ask me what happened to Joe Scarborough, and I think he works at MSNBC, and he's got to keep his job.
I don't know.
I have always liked Scarborough.
Scarborough was a member of the freshman class of 1994 and a conservative, and he was a rock-ribbed conservative.
And he's always been supportive of me.
He always has.
But he's fallen into this trap that everything happens in the middle or that everything of significance happens in the middle.
And the middle doesn't drive anything.
Like I say, you're never going to find books in a library or even one great moderates in American history or great moderates in world history.
Hey, Joe, let's, Reagan and Tip O'Neill.
Now, Ronald Reagan had no media supporting him.
He had no Republican majorities in the House or the Senate.
And he succeeded in 25% across the board tax cuts.
Ronald Reagan didn't give up anything.
Ronald Reagan didn't compromise his conservatism away.
What he did, he did make a deal.
Okay, down the load later on.
He said, okay, if we need to raise some taxes here, I'll do it, but you've got to promise me spending cuts, which he didn't get.
He was betrayed on the spending cut business.
But this last election, what somebody show me the middle here.
The middle, which is these guys claim the independents, where'd they go?
They ran away from the Democrat Party.
They ran as far away as they could.
That took them to the Republican Party.
Why did they go there?
Well, it wasn't so much, as be honest, it wasn't so much because the Republicans were shouting, here's who we are.
All they were doing was saying, we're not Democrats.
What happened was that the great independents, the target audience of this no-labels bunch, figured out they had been snookered by the Obama campaign.
They didn't want anything to do with what this guy was doing as president, the way he was governing.
And we had a huge shellacking.
The Democrats got creamed from Washington all the way down to the dog catcher level in local communities.
And it wasn't centrism that did that.
It was far out, I mean, just fringe, extreme liberalism that drove these people to the right.
There wasn't one campaign from one centrist that took these independents anywhere.
And I actually think that many of these people in the no labels group are failures.
They're failures on the left.
They're failures on the right.
Somehow the left doesn't want them.
The right doesn't want them.
So they're trying to forge a spot for themselves.
They're also trying to come up with political candidates to run as third parties or independents or what have you.
It's about money.
These political consultants have to have jobs.
They have to eat.
And they do believe that every election is won with the great unwashed and the 20%.
That's where they live and breathe.
And as such, they don't dare be ideologues.
But it is ideological principle that drives this country.
And there's always going to be the battle.
And the objective is to defeat the other guy and not get along.
Now, after you've won the election, yeah, you have to do what you have to do sometimes now and then, depending on the numbers.
But the first guy that wins an election, it comes along and compromises what it did, what it was that got him elected, he's dead the next election.
It just, it's, I mean, this last election is proof of it.
So they continued, I guess, this morning on Scarborough's show on PMSNBC.
They brought in Democrat Leadership Conference President Harold Ford Jr. to talk about the No Labels group and me.
And Mika Bzezinski said there's an organization called No Labels.
Mark McKinnon, who's a friend of this show, Republican strategist, among many other things, is one of the, no, he can't be anymore.
He's a no-label strategist.
He was a Republican for one candidate, George W. Bush.
He worked with Democrats throughout his career other than George W. Bush.
Anyway, for their purposes, he's a Republican strategist now, no labels guy, and is one of the founding organizers, which is an organization that, among other things, wants everybody to come together and actually have a real dialogue.
So you see, the dialogue we have here is not real.
It's just based on profits and ratings.
And the same thing on the left.
They're just worried about profits.
There's no real dialogue except the dialogue of these no labels people, these centrists.
And here's Scarborough talking about it.
This offended Rush Limbaugh, who joked about it.
I misoffended Frank Rich.
You look at Rush and you look at, I wouldn't put Frank Rich and Rush necessarily in the same group.
Conservatives say the same thing on the other side.
And guess what?
When Frank Rich is going to compare Republicans to the Ku Klux Klan or have illustrations where they're in Nazi hoods or Klan's hoods, then guess what?
He's in that neighborhood.
And by the way, I got no problem with Rush doing what he does and Frank Rich doing what they do.
I like an energetic debate, but the fact that they are offended by Mark McKinnon saying we need to be more civil, well, I think that speaks to their political character.
Joe, we're not offended by Mark McKinnon saying we need to be more civil.
I don't know anybody's offended by that.
I didn't even know that offended is the right word.
If we're offended by anything, it is the notion that these guys are superior to everybody else in their no-labels structure.
It's pretty much like these independents and moderates who think they're smarter than everybody else because we decide things issue by issue.
We're not close-minded.
We're open-minded.
We judge candidates issue by issue by issue.
We're smarter than everybody else.
We're not nearly as bigoted or closed-minded or any of these other.
We are the true smart people.
And that's what's kind of funny here because I think it's these are people who basically have struck out on one side or the other who are now trying to forge an identity for themselves on some higher plane where only a select few are intellectually, mentally qualified to be members.
When in fact, they're all liberals.
They are all Democrats, even McKinnon.
They're all Democrats.
Kiki Moore, whoever else, the other three primary founders, they're all Democrats in this group.
And they're just, they got shellacked, and they're just trying to get away from liberal Democrat progressive now got shellac.
So they're no labels now.
Here's Nicole Wallace.
She's on the show, too.
Scarborough said, look, you can take controversial stands and be respectful of other people.
I think wherein lies the difference between Frank Rich's criticism and Rush Limbaugh's.
I think that Frank Rich was offended and somehow threatened.
And he speaks from quite a different perch than Rush Limbaugh does.
He speaks to an admitted elite.
Rush Limbaugh has 38 million listeners who represent a large swath of Americans, not just Republicans.
And so I think they came at you from very different perspectives.
I think Rush Limbaugh was, I think, defending the right to be principled, which you are, and which you advocate your principles here every day.
That's pretty much right.
I mean, the idea that principled having core beliefs and not being willing to compromise on core beliefs is somehow rigid or bigoted is a notion that the no labels people are trying to put forth.
But it's just the latest in a long line of efforts to discredit true believers in whatever they believe.
And they can't, I find it interesting.
They can't discredit conservatives on conservatism.
So they have to discredit us on character or comportment or behavior or one of these things that have nothing to do with what we really believe.
Because the whole truth of the matter is that none of these people ever tell me I'm wrong.
All they do is complain about how I say it.
But they never tell me I'm wrong.
They never go that or they don't want to get into a discussion with me about them.
Well, true, they do make it up snurdily about how I say it.
All I'm doing is exposing no labels.
I'm calling a spade a digging implement.
That's all I'm doing here.
No labels are people that do not want to be accurately described.
That is a problem for them.
When people find out exactly who they are, that is a problem.
But I did know, I noted that Scarborough said that Frank Rich is only like me when he calls the GOP the KKK.
Obama did not want to be accurately described.
Jeremiah Wright doesn't want to be accurately described.
None of these guys on the left want to be accurately described, hence, no labels.
One more thing before we go to the break here, and this is not related to no labels.
It's Juan Williams.
This is on Fox News Sunday yesterday during the roundtable.
Chris Wallace has Juan Williams on, and who else?
Well, it doesn't matter.
Well, no, wait.
Yep, just Juan Williams and Chris Wallace.
He says, Senate leader Mitch McConnell, big leader in this session, negotiated a tax cut deal with the president.
Some would say he got the better end of it.
He persuaded, as we just mentioned in the last part, his fellow Republicans, even those who had big earmarks, to abandon the omnibus spending bill.
Good session for McConnell Juan.
The economy is going to do well next year, by all estimates.
This package is essentially a stimulus package, which is what brought the objections from Republicans, including the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Shakespeare.
It's going to improve the economy under Barack Obama's watch, and it's going to accrue to the benefit of Barack Obama's presidential hopes, and I think Democrats in general.
Yeah, there are people who have that genuine fear that the economy, its own inertia, is going to improve.
This is not going to have anything to do with it because nothing's changing.
The only thing that could have happened was the economy could have been worsened if the Democrats had gotten what they really wanted, tax increases.
But you notice here that Juan Williams confirms that Obama's calling it a stimulus.
He wants that word out there.
He wants it to be called, even though there's nothing stimulative in this.
Again, it's all about how the table's set.
It's all about where the baseline is.
The baseline for this was taxes are going up at the end of the year, unless.
And so people had it in their minds that the tax increase had already happened.
And now, all of a sudden, guess it's not going to happen.
So we had a tax cut, even though nothing changed.
And we got a stimulus now because we got a tax cut.
It's going to benefit Obama going into the.
And people on our side think, it's over, Rush.
Obama's snooker.
The president is always going to get credit for a booming economy.
Blah, blah, blah.
We'll see about that.
Back to the phones now.
Rush Limbaugh to Lexington, Virginia.
This is John.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush.
Hey.
Thanks for taking the call.
You bet, sir.
And for what you're doing for our country.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
To get to the point, I get nervous when I hear virtually everybody saying that unless Obama can stimulate the economy, get the economy rolling, get jobs created, he's finished.
Well, I think that the mechanisms are already in place for him to do, even if it's only appearing to do that, to do just that.
You mean get credit for a rebounding economy?
Yes, sir.
I think that the carbon commodities markets, the regional greenhouse gas initiative states, the good grief, what is it, a trillion and a half of unspent tarp EQ1 and 2 money is just waiting to be handed out to companies like GE, Chevron, these carbon trading markets in these specific states.
And there's a lot of jobs that are going to be created, pumping out windmills and solar panels.
Why is it going to work 2012 when it didn't work in 2010?
And there's not a trillion and a half in unspent tarp.
It's like 200 billion.
Right, but you add QE1 and QE2, and you know they're going to create whatever print, whatever money that they want to build windmills and solar to make these greenhouse gas states look like their economies are rebounding.
And how are we going to compete with that if and when they actually start looking just like the ethanol?
And you know, it's going to look like rebounding, but it really won't be for certainly for a long term.
A lot of windmill companies are going out of business.
I know, I know, but that's not going to happen.
I don't know how many windmills they're going to be able to build in the next two years and then bring online to even fake some kind of uptick in economic activity.
Well, I certainly hope you're right.
But I just, let's not let's let's say you're right.
Okay.
What do we do?
Well, whether it's windmills or solar panels or whatever green industries, you know that they're waiting to get federal money to start producing these things because they're tipping their hand.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
Look, I got one minute.
Let's say they do all of this.
They start hiring people left in droves.
They get windmills and all sorts of stuff.
It's all your driver.
That's all you see is windmills.
And so we're defeated, right?
What do we do?
Well, I'm just talking about 10-12 now.
I mean, 2012.
I don't know how short-term energy is.
That's what I'm saying.
You're saying we got no prayer.
It's over.
So what do we do?
I don't know.
That's what I'm asking you.
Well, I'm trying to tell you, I don't agree with you, but I want to throw.
If you sound pretty convinced that we're already dead, it sounds like New Zealand time for me.
I don't think we're dead.
I just think we might be taking our eye off the ball with a lot of distractions.
Like what?
Well, like all of the lean duck silliness that's going on in Congress right now, just already.
I have to tell you, you know, we're just, I don't know what we can do.
We are being outsmarted with every breath we take, and I don't know what we can do.
Look, I can tell you here, folks, even the top Obama economists don't believe the economy is going to turn, I mean, huge by 2012.
Which is why we're constantly being told about how this is the new normal.
I also think that's to lower expectations.
And I talked, it depends on who you talk to.
I was in Boston over the weekend, some people there who think the economy is starting to come back and echoed what this guy was just saying.
And Obama's a smart guy.
It's coming back at the right time.
And by hook or by crook, he's going to get credit for it just because he's president.
You talk to other people, nah, nah, nah.
If you're talking about employment, we're not going to have any serious uptick in employment.
The ingredients aren't there for people to start hiring on a permanent, recognizable basis.
That it's the whole dynamic has changed.
If people could predict what the next two years of economic activity was going to be, do you realize we wouldn't be in this recession?
We would have known it's coming and we could have stopped it.
This is bigger than anybody can predict or massage.
And so this is one of these things you have to wait and see.
But this notion that Obama's outsmarting us at every turn, I don't know.
I just get worn out with that.
Because if you think that, why even try?
Why even mess with this?
These guys are going to win.
If they're going to outsmart us with windmills and green energy and GE getting all kind of trillion and a half dollars start hiring people, what can we do?
Other than tell people that that's what's going on, here's, let's see, Kevin in Chicago.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Kiddos from the People's Republic of Illinois, Rosh.
Thank you, sir.
I just have a question for you.
What is the big deal with all these NFL players crying about playing on a frozen field when you've got hockey players playing on ice three, four, five times a week?
All right.
This happens to be, for me, a great question.
And let me answer this for you.
Let me explain what he's talking about.
This is all about this game tonight at the University of Minnesota football field, which is not an NFL stadium.
Now, I do believe it has the latest artificial turf, but it does not have a heating system under it.
So it can freeze.
Now, he's right.
NFL players play on hard, frozen fields, and they have throughout their careers.
Remember, what's going on out there, Kevin, is the collective bargaining agreement is up for negotiation.
The league is making a huge deal out of concussions.
There are penalty flags flying.
There are fines.
There are all kinds of things.
The league is trying to make everybody think that the most upward concern they have is player safety, particularly concussions.
They're going overboard.
We're holding players out a week or two extra when they, in the old days, they go back in in five minutes after being on the bench.
They're making a big deal that the league is about how much they are concerned about player safety.
So all the players are doing, oh, really?
You really care about playing?
So we're going to play here on a stadium that's not NFL ready, that might have a frozen field, and our heads are going to get knocked around on this field, and we might get a couple cuts.
This is gamesmanship, is what this is.
It's caused me to give up on the NFL is what it is.
I'm just tired of hearing all the crying about all of it.
I really am.
Wait.
I'm not even going to watch it.
I'm not right here in Bears Country, and I'm not even going to watch.
And I grew up being a Vikings fan.
What is it that's souring you on the NFL?
It's all the crying.
Who's crying?
The showing off.
Who's crying?
After making a simple play.
Who is crying?
Kevin, you understand.
I'm trying to talk to you when you're talking.
You're on the cell phone, right?
Yes.
You can't.
In Chicago, yeah.
Okay, you're missing 90% of what I'm saying to you.
I'm asking you some questions.
So after each sentence, would you pause if you can?
Because you're saying a lot of things I want you to answer.
I want to have a good conversation.
We've got an inferior phone system here that's not permitting me to do that.
You're tired of hearing all the crying.
Who?
Who is crying?
The players.
About what?
About safety, about fines, just in general.
And this knockout.
And this has you down on the league because in the old days, they gutted it up and played through these situations, and now they're coming off like less than men, more crybaby-ish.
Yes, and all you have to do is go across town to watch the Blackhawks, and these guys are getting smashed all the time.
Yep.
That's true.
They're getting headed on the ice.
They're getting headed up on the boards.
They're getting headed with sticks.
They're getting headed with the puck.
So I'm just interested in this because I think this is just gamesmanship.
I really don't think the players are baby.
In fact, I think the players are frustrated.
I think the players are frustrated at the fines because they look at this as a marketing thing by the league.
There are, and look, there have been some veteran players who've had brain injuries that have occurred to them after they retired much earlier in life than the average person.
There's no questions of price to pay for playing the game.
And the league is responding to this because they need to keep fans.
They don't want to lose you, Kevin.
They're trying to keep you, and they're trying to keep the stars on the field for the long term.
Look at this.
I don't know if you saw it in Indianapolis yesterday.
It's Kid Austin Collie, third concussion in less than three games.
All three of them have been heart-stoppingly like, is this guy going to get up?
They have been.
Heath Miller of the Steelers took a hit a couple weeks ago, and players actually on the field thought he broke his neck.
He ended up walking off the field.
The Steelers have kept him out two consecutive weeks.
This is new.
This is entirely new this year, and the fines that are going, there haven't been suspensions yet.
By the same token, yesterday in the Steelers game, Ryan Clark, the safety number 25, with just a perfect textbook hit on a receiver and was fined for it, or at least flagged for it.
And it's the exact kind of hit textbook football.
It was not helmet to helmet.
It was shoulder to shoulder.
He launched himself.
It was a missile, and it was a huge hit.
And so there's, you know, players are confused.
What's legal?
What isn't?
What am I going to get fined for?
What's not?
So with all this going on, now they take him to a field that to them is essentially a sand lot field.
So they're going to say, well, wait a minute.
You guys of the league say you're all concerned about our safety and you're putting it as this is just gamesmanship because the collective bargaining agreement's up.
Pure and simple.
You're probably right on that, Russia.
Well, the odds are that I am.
The odds are.
Well, thanks a lot, Rush.
I appreciate it.
Okay, Kevin, thanks for it.
Appreciate the call.
Hail Guiding White, El Rushbow, and John in Cosby, Tennessee.
You're welcome to have your time on the air here, sir.
Hi.
Hi, thanks for taking my call.
Yes, sir.
Hey, on this don't ask, don't tell.
One of the things that bothers me is the greater issue of how the debate is cast in terms of bigotry versus tolerance.
Speaking as a pastor, I'm concerned that we aren't able to take a moral stand in this country anymore without being called a bigot.
A couple of our recent military leaders have said, if you don't like serving with this new policy, then quit.
Yeah, I think you're right.
We got two kinds of generals and two kinds of military people.
Warriors, warriors, and politicians who want to climb the ranks within the Pentagon.
Right.
You're not dealing with the warriors.
You're dealing with the politicians.
There are two kinds of them.
I guess so.
But maybe liberals could understand.
I mean, if they feel like they can regulate public smoking and they're morally against that because it hurts others, does that make them a bigot against smokers?
Or, you know.
I'm sorry.
Yeah, yeah.
But what's missing there is that a cigarette's an inanimate object.
A gay person isn't.
Okay, well, what about teenage pregnancy, alcoholism?
I'm not for that.
Does that make me a bigot?
No, but it means you do not understand the way kids are these days.
Kids are just going to have sex, Pastor.
There's nothing we can do to stop it.
Everybody knows that.
Everybody.
What we need to do is go all the way, give them the bed, the nightstand, a pack of cigarettes for afterwards, and make sure the sheets are clean so they're not doing it in the back of the car.
That's the liberal solution.
So there's no way out of the bigotry corner.
Well, there is.
Yeah, you do what you do, and hell with being called a bigot.
You're not a bigot.
None of us standing up for morality are bigot.
It is, you know, morality is always on the enemies list of the left because involved in morality is judgment.
Right.
Yeah, nobody there.
You're not good enough to judge anybody.
Who are you, Reverend?
That's their reaction.
You don't know me, and you judge what I'm doing.
You keep it to yourself.
You can take your morality.
You can stuff it.
Well, I don't believe, you know, sometimes I say, well, I don't choose to be this way or that.
And I don't believe that people choose what tempts them.
But if we can't say that we're unable to choose our behavior, then we've got a real problem.
We've got a low view of man.
We don't believe what makes us different than animals.
Right.
We're just automatons.
If we don't, which, yeah, that's just a way of offering an excuse.
Well, that's my point, and I appreciate the chance to share that with you.
Well, you're not in the minority.
Okay.
You're just made to look like it.
You best stop watching the mainstream media, and you'll quickly have a different anti.
You are not in the minority.
You are only a bigot when you speak out against what the establishment wants.
That's all.
You're going to be charged with hate speech simply because the left doesn't want to hear any opposition.
That's, you know, it's a threat.
That's what political correctness is.
Shut up.
We don't want to hear what you say because it threatens us.
Folks, there's every reason in the world to believe that this is just a relaxed holiday week in Washington.
Snowfall over the weekend, Christmas cards in the White House being delivered to a few people.
I did not get mine this year.
There are endless, well, I had a streak.
I had eight years in a row of getting a White House Christmas card, but somehow didn't show this year.
All the endless holiday parties going on.
But do you remember last Christmas Eve?
Last Christmas Eve, the Senate voted twice that day, once to raise the nation's debt limit to $12.4 trillion.
You remember what the other vote was last Christmas Eve?
Nope, passage of the National Health Care Bill.
Obama care passed on Christmas Eve last year.
So you can understand why the Heritage Foundation is working full days this week, right through December 24th.
They will not trust a Liberal Congress still in session.
Why should they?
And, you know, starts the big deal that's up now, and it's an abomination.
It's an absolute disaster.
And they're taking the occasion of relaxed attitudes during this week to try to get that through.
Heritage Foundation is my favorite Washington watchdog.
They keep in the Washington loop around the clock.
And they offer membership as low as $25.
You can join at askheritage.org, and that's the website to have access to the voluminous work that they do.
Many of you have asked, well, what does membership mean?
Well, it means that you can support the work that they do.
It means you get inside scoop on the latest policy debate.
You get the research.
You don't have to wait for it to be published and go find it someplace.
You get it.
You get to see it.
Read it.
It's yours as a member.
Make yourself a member.
Do it before December 31st of this year.
Be part of Heritage for the entire new year.
It's at askheritage.org.
At an all-day, what's the date of this thing?
This is last Friday at an all-day White House conference on environmental justice.
Now, what is environmental justice?
Like, what's food justice?
Crazy, whacked-out liberal terms.
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Big Sis Napolitano announced her department is creating a new task force to battle the effects of climate change on domestic security operations.
They can't do anything about climate change directly, so they repackage it.
They lump it together with Homeland Security.
If I didn't know better, I would say that these people are the new brown shirts.
It ain't going to be long before big sis are going to be coming into our homes demanding to check the usage of appliances, light bulb placement.
These Democrats, folks, they are doubling down now against the majority of Americans in revenge for the bashing they got at the polls.
Story we started off today with about how they're enlisting garbage men to spy on you.
All of this spying on average citizens.
This is how they do when they lose elections.
You are going to pay.
Notice, folks, that the battling the effects of climate change seems to have a much higher priority than protecting the people on the border from an armed invasion from Mexico.
Climate change, much higher on Big Sis's list than border security, environmental justice.
▲
Export Selection