All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 17, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:42
November 17, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Like clockwork, it is and it was predictable and it is happening.
Even now as we speak, about 200 University of California students and faculty have gathered at UC San Francisco's Mission Bay campus to protest proposed student fee hikes, increases, and changes to employee retirement plans.
Protest is taking place outside a UC Border Regents meeting where the board will consider an 8% fee increase for the students, picket lines formed in various parts of the campus with students and teachers chanting, you see me, you see worker poverty.
You see me, you see student poverty.
The video of the protest appears to show the protesters being pepper sprayed by the cops at one point.
At least five protesters have been arrested.
UC President Mark Udoff has promised, or I'm sorry, proposed raising fees by 8% for the 2011-2012 academic year, which means undergraduate fees.
This is in-state tuition.
Undergraduate fees in California would increase to $11,124 a year.
Now, that's the in-state fee, which now gives me an idea.
If they didn't give in-state price breaks to illegal aliens, maybe they wouldn't have to raise the fees for everybody else.
But you knew this is going to happen, just as we see long-haired, maggot-in-fisted, dope-smoking FM types in the UK doing this.
Here now comes, and in California, you knew it was going to happen, and this is just the forerunner of many of these types of public protests and displays.
Greetings.
Great to have you back.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882.
It's open line Friday on Wednesday today.
Mark Stein will be here tomorrow and Friday.
And don't fret.
I'm leaving him with plenty of football and golf stories to talk about, as well as anything left unsaid about dancing with the stars that I don't get to today.
Now, there was supposed to be a big confab bipartisan meeting on the Bush tax cuts with President Obama, supposed to be held this week, but they have postponed it now to November 30th.
Now, I'll tell you what's shaping up here.
Dingy Harry's out there saying it, number, they don't want to extend the current tax rates, the so-called Bush tax cuts, for people in the upper bracket, the so-called rich.
Dingy Harry is out there calling that charity.
At the same time, as we told you earlier in the program, extended unemployment benefits for millions of Americans are set to perspire pretty soon.
And the Democrats want those to be extended.
So it looks like what's going to happen here is that the Democrats will offer to go along with a temporary extension of all tax rates, including for the rich, if our guys will agree to an extension of extended unemployment benefits.
I think something like 2 million people on November 30th, if I remember right, will lose their benefits if nothing is done.
That happens to be the day the meeting has been rescheduled for.
Now, it is said, this is in the Washington Post, the postponement was a bad omen for Obama, who was counting on the summit to start turning around his political fortunes.
It appeared to signal that Republicans are less anxious than the White House to launch a new era of bipartisanship.
And it was a stark example of Obama's diminished ability to get members of Congress to bend to his will.
So making it look like the Republicans here are the ones that requested the postponement.
I don't know if that's true.
Anyway, the issue is a no-brainer.
I don't know why postpone this unless they think there's some pressure that is being added to Obama here.
Here's how the Washington Post describes this.
The bipartisan White House meeting Obama had hoped to hold this week to discuss tax cuts and other matters has been postponed.
Obama had summoned congressional leaders from both parties for a gathering tomorrow to discuss the way forward after the midterm elections.
Meeting was to focus on economic concerns, particularly tax cuts that are set to perspire at the end of the year.
But the White House said in a statement last night that the meeting had been rescheduled at the request of Mitch McConnell and John Boehner due to scheduling conflicts in organizing their cauckey.
The meeting will now be held on November 30th, which again is the date that the extended unemployment benefits are set to perspire.
The postponement just means that these important issues are going to get very little attention because Congress will go on its Christmas vacation not long after November the 30th.
So, but I have to laugh here.
This phrase here, it's it appeared to signal that Republicans are less anxious than the White House to launch a new era of bipartisan.
What is this obsession with bipartisanship?
Remember, we quoted from the Richard Wolf book, Rahm Emmanuel, never believed in bipartisanship.
The other side doesn't believe in it.
The only time it ever matters is when Republicans are in charge, and then the press and everybody else starts caterwauling about bipartisanship.
So we'll have to wait and see what happened.
Don Stewart, a spokesman for McConnell, said the meeting was never confirmed in the first place.
The meeting will happen.
The schedulers just haven't confirmed the date and time yet, but nobody pulled out here.
The postponement, whatever the reason, a bad omen for Obama.
I don't know.
We'll see.
Maybe this is a wise move.
Why give Obama an extra minute to demagogue the issue?
Why give him time to twist arms?
This issue is a no-brainer, and I think Obama should have to play on the Republicans' schedule and on their field, which what they've done now is tighten the timeframe.
They have sort of rationed down the timeframe of Democrats and Obama have to work on this.
And as the delay continues, there will be pressure to act.
Obama has, I guess the figuring is that Obama's been placed at a disadvantage here.
And it's clear that one impression left is that Obama does not call the shots on this stuff anymore, which is a major, major change.
You think this would have happened, you think this would have happened three weeks after the election in 2008?
If Obama had requested a bipartisan meeting in his transition period and the Republicans, screw you, you know, we're going to work it over.
It would not have happened at all.
This is a great indication of the major shift in the balance of power.
Audio soundbite time.
This morning in Washington, Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee hearing on reviewing of airport security measures.
Claire McCaskill, Senator, Missouri.
I have had my love pats every single flight I have taken, which is at least twice a week for the last four years of my life because I have a knee replacement.
So I am wildly excited about the notion that I can walk through a machine instead of getting my dose of love pats.
All right, so the country is in revolt over these searches, and she dismisses them as love pats.
Yeah, I got my love pats.
I would just as soon go through the machine as Claire McCaskill is no doubt thinking, what have I got to hide?
Not going to touch her junk.
I don't even want to think about it, folks.
I really don't want to think about it.
Ezra Klein this morning on Joe Scarborough's show on PMS NBC, they're talking about Democrats being in disarray.
And Scarborough says, Ezra, one of the key players when you talk about budget negotiations, sorting through the tax cuts, is the budget chairman in the Senate, Kent Conrad.
You sat down, you talked with him.
What's his take?
His take struck me as almost depressed.
I don't know that he has seen Democrats quite so inexplicably in disarray on an issue.
They have no idea what their strategy is on this.
Ken Conrad has come forward and said we can do a short-term extension and tie it to tax reform.
Other voices in the party want to get rid of the tax cuts for the rich.
Others want to tie it to unemployment insurance or a rise in the debt ceiling.
Ken Conrad couldn't tell me what the Democrats were going to do, and nor can anyone else.
The degree to which Democrats have not been able to pull together a strategy on this issue, given the amount of time they have had to do so, is absolutely appalling.
Well, the Politico is saying that the GOP postponement of the meeting is a big deal.
Ratcheting up even more pressure down, maybe we should say, on Obama.
Now, that debt ceiling is also something they are going to try to make political hay out of.
You watch.
Because they're running around.
The Democrats are, well, what would you cut?
What would you cut?
What would you cut?
Huh?
You think you're going to cut the budget?
What would you cut?
And you want to cut the budget?
Well, you're going to raise the debt ceiling.
You want people to starve?
They're going to play that card out of the box because it has to be.
They'll tie the tax cut being extended to something.
But regardless, they're in disarray.
What are they in disarray about?
What could they possibly be in disarray about?
And that is they don't know what the impact of their decision is going to be.
They got, folks, they got shellacked.
And they know, I mean, the public consumption is it was messaging.
They know it wasn't messaging.
They know full well why they lost big, and it's Obama.
And they know they've got even more seats in the Senate at risk in 2012.
McCaskill is one of them.
Last night, Sergeant Schultz was speaking to Katrina Vandenhoe on his show.
Sergeant Schultz, of course, I know nothing.
Nothing.
Which fits.
Sergeant Schultz said to Katrina Van den Hoovel, you think Obama has it in him to change?
This is a man who rose out of almost nowhere, who had the audacity and the strength to get elected as president of the United States.
And he must understand that he needs to recalibrate.
He was rolled by the bankers, rolled by the generals, rolled by the blue dogs, rolled by the Republicans.
He is a man of intense intelligence.
He has to see this is not a faith-based presidency.
Americans voted.
He's brilliant.
Obama is brilliant.
You heard her.
Obama is a man of intense intelligence.
But somehow everybody on earth rolled him.
The Republicans rolled him.
The bankers rolled him.
The generals rolled him.
The blue dogs rolled him.
But he's really smart.
Really?
He's brilliant.
Just brilliant, but everybody outsmarted him somehow.
And now he has to recalibrate.
Last night on CNN, John King, USA, Senator McCaskill, who likes her love pats before getting on airplanes, was asked, looking ahead of 2012, knowing the president's standing in your state down quite a bit.
Do you envision campaigning side by side with the president, or would you rather campaign for reelection on your own?
You know, I think the president has to really focus on getting elected to a second term in 2012, and I need to focus on making sure I'm accountable to the people of Missouri.
If our paths cross, that's great.
This is the first of many Democrats sending an unmistakable signal to the White House, you keep him away from me.
Let's move forward to audio soundback number 12.
Alan Simpson last night was on the Charlie Rose show.
Of course, Alan Simpson, the bipartisan debt commission co-chairman, former Republican senator from Wyoming.
And Charlie Rose said, people know we can't keep borrowing like this because Obama does not know that, Charlie.
The Democrats do not know that, Charlie.
And if they know it, they're not heeding it.
It's not just borrowing, it's printing.
I'm sorry, I get distracted by these guys.
Charlie Rose said, people know we can't keep borrowing like this because they can't do it in their own budgets, so they know their country can't survive by doing it.
Charlie, you voted for this.
There's no doubt you voted for this.
Do you ever feel like you are surrounded by fools?
Do you ever feel, I mean, at all levels.
I'm exhaling.
I'm trying to maintain my composure here.
Of all the times to tell us, who knew?
Who knew that you can't spend more than you'd have?
Who knew this?
What wizard figures this out after two generations of debt have been stolen?
I don't know what books he reads.
I don't know who his mentors are.
I don't know that much about him.
But by God, I'm going to vote for him because I'm a good person.
Okay, so that's the question.
Charlie Rose asking Alan Simpson, babe.
People know you can't keep borrowing like this.
You can't do it in your own home.
Country can't survive by doing it.
You voted for this, Charlie.
It's your fault.
Sorry, folks.
Here's Simpson's answer.
When those guys get here that say, we're going to go ahead and cut 40%, why, you know, Merry Christmas, the drinks are on me.
And if you can't compromise an issue without compromising yourself, you're not a legislator.
You're just an ineffective totem.
If you can't learn how to compromise an issue without compromising yourself, go home.
What's he talking about?
He's talking about the Tea Party.
Alan Simpson.
Oh, yeah.
Say you're going to cut 40%.
Well, Merry Christmas.
Drinks are on me.
If you can't compromise an issue without compromising yourself, you're not a legislator.
Well, now that tells us a lot.
See, the measure of a legislator is how much you compromise.
Anyway, back to the phones.
We go, Casa Grande, Arizona.
Rob, thank you for waiting, sir.
You are next.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
How are you?
A little nervous, you know, talking to you.
Yeah, I'm an airline pilot, and I have some strong feelings as well as a lot of my comrades about these new enhanced TSA procedures with the body scan and the enhanced pat down.
The pat down, the love pads.
Oh, boy, yeah, the love pads, exactly.
You know, we have to choose.
For me, in order for me to go to work, I have to choose between having a picture taken of me naked or being felt up and molested.
And I'm not alone in this.
The pilots union, the National Pilots Union, Alpha, has sent out messages saying that we advise everybody not to go through the rapid scan, the backscatter imaging system.
They want to use up as many resources as possible by having agents have to pat us all down.
And hopefully that'll do something.
But all the pilots are on board with all the passengers.
It's just not right.
It's taking away our civil liberties.
Let me ask you a question.
As a pilot, I want you to tell me the truth.
Sure.
Even if you get through the scanner, even if you get through the pat down, you can still crash the plane, right?
Absolutely.
Okay.
I'm not saying, you know, I don't want to.
So what's the point in patting you down?
What is the point in subjecting?
You can still drive the plane into the ground.
That's exactly right.
And, you know, I've talked to a lot of guys I've fly with about this, and I've come to the conclusion that they're using us as an example.
If they can put us through that kind of treatment, then what foot does a passenger, well, you know, what foot does a passenger have to stand on that they have to be put through it?
You know what?
They better start screaming for people that don't like a Bristol palin and dancing with the stars because people are shooting out their own television sets.
Can you imagine if one of these wackos got on your flight?
Yeah.
You ought to just have to flash a picture of Bristol Palin at the checkpoint and see what people do.
That's right.
That's right.
You know, and seriously, folks, you think I'm being flippant here, but I'm not.
What kind of logic is it where you're going to put the pilots through this?
And they can pass with flying colors.
And if somebody's bought you off or if somebody's kidnapped your daughter, whatever it is, if you want to fly that plane into the ground, you can do it.
Yeah, that's right.
And, you know, it's just, I'll tell you what.
I won't subject my little girl and my boy to that pat down.
We'll drive.
You know, I won't let them go through it.
She's three years old, and I just, I don't know what to tell you.
I know.
This is a miniature revolt out there.
And what they're saying is, hey, well, if you don't like it, don't fly.
Yeah.
Now, what I want to know, and we asked this yesterday, but it is a valid question.
Is your airline upset about any of this?
I mean, this stuff could, if a lot of people have the attitude you just said, my kid's not going to fly.
And not patting my kids down.
Your airline can't possibly like this.
Well, we got a message from one of the management.
We have like an in-house union.
My airline isn't part of the major national union.
But the in-house union said they talked to one of the management guys and said, we're advising all of our pilots to not go through the backscatter, you know, and to do the pat down and take way.
It'll take more time, but it might delay flights and it might cancel flights.
And the management pilot said, you know, we don't think you guys should have to go through it either.
So that's the only official word that we've gotten.
No, but no, no, no.
I'll just make myself clear.
If big sis, if the government says, if you don't like it, don't fly, what does Mr. Airline CEO or Mr. Airline shareholder say about this?
The government's targeting his business with this.
And there's a simple way to stop this stuff.
It's called profiling.
We're not doing what's simple here.
The problems, the solutions are simple.
They're just hard for some people to stomach.
It's a little Ohio player love roller coaster.
By the way, the Democrats just re-elected Pelosi as their leader.
And here's the story for, where is it?
I got the, what did I do with it?
Communist Party USA.
Yep, right here.
Let's see.
This Communist Progressive Caucus will now have a more prominent role within.
It's like Stalin said, we may have fewer communists, but they're pure.
This is a Communist Party newspaper, Communist Party, USA political action, Joel Fishman.
I got a picture of her here.
Lennon observed no strike has lost because workers learned from the experience and become stronger.
The Progressive Caucus, which lost only three members out of 80, will now have a more prominent role within the smaller minority Democrat caucus.
Co-chair Raul Grijalva of Arizona, among those targeted by the right-wing because of his stands in immigration reform, defeated his Tea Party opponents with an outpouring of support from labor, peace, and other communist groups.
The new political landscape will demand a lot of street heat and unity in tactics to enlarge the coalition, keeping Republicans in check.
This is all from the Communist Party USA.
They're very happy.
Now, over there in the Washington Post, there's a story, House Democrats meet privately to regroup after the midterm election.
One Democrat loser is quoted in this story as saying Pelosi's the face of our defeat.
That's Alan Boyd.
And then they went to Heath Schuler.
And he said he's from Tennessee.
I'm sorry, North Carolina.
He's North Carolina.
Was Pelosi's lone challenger for minority leader?
He said, when I played in the NFL and you lost significantly, you were replaced.
That stretch, why he's in Congress.
And I had that conversation direct with her.
He's a former Redskins quarterback.
He was a high draft choice.
Didn't pen out.
But Pelosi's, you got to love it.
They kept the same leadership.
In fact, the Congressional Black Caucus just moments ago signed off, gave their stamp of approval to Clyburn's new leadership position.
So whatever she did in there, she brought it off, folks.
I'll tell you what, well, yeah, Clyburn is driving his own car now.
Well, no, no, he's actually, somebody's driving Mr. Clyburn now.
It all worked out.
Speaking of that, if you missed the first hour, the American left's in a tizzy today.
This is from Media 8, or Media 8, their website, Rush Limbaugh Race Bait Du Jour.
Obama and gang are graffiti on walls of American history.
This old Andrew Sullivan, Andrew Sullivan, the Atlantic does fit to be tied because apparently graffiti means black and so does gang to him.
Anyway, conservative radio hosting serial race baiter Rush Limbaugh done it again.
To no one's surprise, Limbaugh accompanied a rant about Barack Obama's presidency as graffiti on the walls of American history.
I love the line.
I must tell you.
With both a reference to Obama's gang and a mock-up of a tagged Mount Rushmore on his website, the Atlantic's Andrew Sullivan calls Rush out for his worn-out tactics, but fails to put a fine enough point on it.
Rush Limbaugh is not only a race baiter, he is a coward.
Listen to the segment after the jump, and this is on Media 8 or Media 8.
Mediate.
Yeah, that's what a Mediate.
Media, it's a blog that Dan Abrams used to be at PMSNBC started.
Oh boy, Dan Abrams.
Dan Abrams, yeah, he had a show, a legal show on MSNB, 6 o'clock.
I think he did.
I think Dan Abrams was the general manager.
He ran the place.
Sergeant Schultz now has his show.
Same audience, too.
We got to go back.
For people who didn't hear this, we got to find Sheila Jackson Lee.
They got to find, I think it soundbites.
I forget.
Number five.
Grab number five.
If you missed this, this is last night on Sergeant Schultz's show on MSNBC.
This is Sheila Jackson Lee, a Congresswoman Democrat from Texas.
And Sergeant Schultz said, there's no question Limbaugh has targeted you.
He's targeted James Clyburn.
It's been deplorable, despicable, whatever adjective you want to use.
You've been called a Sergeant Schultz.
I don't know that to be your name.
You have a name that may be ethnically connected to being a sergeant.
I'm not sure what that is, but I find that insulting as well.
Stop this a second.
How is somebody ethnically connected to being a sergeant?
How do you get ethnicity out of Sergeant?
Re-Que this, Mike.
Go to the top.
I don't know how these are people sitting around waving to be offended, waving to be racially offended, waving to be mad about something.
But it gets even better.
You've been called a Sergeant Schultz.
I don't know.
I don't know that to be your name.
I'm a little sensitive to, you know, ethnically connected to being a sergeant.
This is gibberish.
It is genuine.
This is a woman who wants during the Clinton.
Folks, I kid you not.
During the Clinton impeachment hearings, Sheila Jackson Lee wanted the Bill of Rights read aloud so there would be a written record of them in the congressional record.
You don't understand?
She wanted the Bill of Rights read aloud so there would be a written record of them.
Don't make me explain this.
Because they'll call me a racist if I have to explain this.
I'm not going to explain it.
She wanted a written record of the Bill of Rights and therefore asked that they be read aloud.
I know she can't help it.
There's a woman also over at NASA watching the Mars rover wander around the surface of Mars, ask NASA officials, well, will it get over to where the astronauts planted the flag on Mars?
And of course, the NASA officials, realizing that there are cameras there and realizing this woman votes on their funding, said, not this trip.
Okay, here's the sound bite where she is outraged over my various vernacular at Sergeant Schultz.
You've been called a Sergeant Schultz.
I don't know that to be your name.
You have a name that may be ethnically connected to being a sergeant.
I'm not sure what that is, but I find that insulting as well.
I would say to Rush Limbo's listeners, we all have distinctive diction, have accents.
There are southern accents, there are Midwestern accents.
There are accents that indicate that you may have been an immigrant.
I frankly find the take on various vernacular as absolutely outrageous.
Okay, ethnically connected to being a sergeant, finds that outrageous.
Insulting, I should say.
And then she takes the take on various vernacular as absolutely outrageous.
I want you people to know that there are accents, southern, midwestern, even accents to indicate that you're an immigrant.
What was the immigrant accent?
What is what is, let's see, how about this accent?
I did not have sex a single time for that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.
And I never asked anybody to lie.
What accent is that?
Horny?
Oh, I'm sorry the week is ending.
I actually am.
Here's the actual quote from Sheila Jackson Lee on the Mars rover.
She actually made the remarks during NASA hearings that she was chairing.
And that's why the NASA guys, I mean, this is the woman's in charge of her funding.
And that's why they said, not this trip.
What she actually said was 1997, Sheila Jackson Lee, who, by the way, we have to assume makes sense in her district, they understand her there.
In 1997, Sheila Jackson Lee made news during a subcommittee briefing when she asked a NASA scientist if the Mars Pathfinder had photographed the flag that Neil Armstrong had left behind.
Also, some of the most famous graffiti in the world is Kilroy was here.
World War II, Kilroy was here.
I'm sure Uncle Schultz would not understand that reference.
I think, you know, Sheila Jackson, you've explained this.
They're just, she's asked a question, and she knows that she's got to say something for 30 seconds.
So syllables come out with words that are like knee-jerk reaction kind of words that like Bush Hitler, this thing that these people think and say, and some of them make sense when they're put together and some of them don't.
And then at the end of the 30 seconds, you then say you're outraged.
And that's the sound bite.
And then she looks at the camera very pleased with herself.
I first noticed this watching the McNeil Lara news hour.
It was way back in the 80s.
There was a guest by the name of late 80s, early 90s, a guest by the name of Dimitri Symes from some Washington think tank.
And he spoke with a very heavy Eastern European accent.
And I got the biggest chuckle watching this guy because I couldn't understand what he was saying except when he said Bush's name.
Bush!
Bush!
And he'd look at the camera with a big smile like he was as satisfied as he could be.
And the only thing I understood him saying was boosh or boosh.
Or what have you.
Look, folks, I study this stuff.
You know, I'm in the spoken word business.
As you know, I'm one of the world's most renowned mimics.
And I make it as it's almost a scientific study of the way people speak and what they say.
The way to understand this is Sheila Jackson Lee, when she speaks, it's like the difference between random typing and writing.
If you just sit at a keyboard and start pounding it versus writing something.
And all the while this is happening, Uncle Schultz is sitting there looking like he understands every word of it.
Uncle Schultz is nodding with great appreciation and understanding, which, of course, when Uncle Schultz nods and all this, just encourages Sheila Jackson Lee to continue.
Anyway, identity theft.
I can't leave today without reminding you, identity theft is rapidly becoming one of the most frequently occurring crimes in the top 10.
Insider access to databases, people that work in banks or any outfit where has a large computer database of people's information, including social security numbers, seems to be where most of this identity theft is taking place.
Compromised social security numbers.
They are the backbone of identity theft.
And it is a crime.
It's getting more and more serious.
And as I've mentioned countless times, it's something that happens to you.
It's hell putting yourself back together.
It really is.
You walk into a bank where they know you, but you're not you because the computer says you're not you.
Somebody else has stolen your identity.
They're running up charges on your credit card.
You'll never hope to be able to pay them back.
Even though everybody knows that it's not you doing it, it's still your card.
It's still you.
And it is an absolute nightmare to get this reverse.
You don't want it to happen to you.
And the best way to keep it from happening to you is Life Lock.
When it comes to protecting your identity, don't worry or mess with anybody else.
They have the best identity alert system there is, and it doesn't cost much.
And it costs even less if you mention my name when you call them.
The number is 800-440-4833.
LifeLock, 800-440-4833.
You can trust your social security number with Life Luck.
And remember, offer code Rush saves you an additional 10%.
Sonia in Herkheimer, New York.
Nice to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hi.
Thank you.
Thank you, Rush.
Thank you, thirdly.
You're welcome.
Well, I'd like to address the Obamacare how, in fact, it's a tax on the poorer, or if you will, we're lower, upper, lower class.
We can't afford health insurance, and we make too much to get it through the state.
Well, that's too bad because you're going to get fined if you don't have it.
And, you know, I mean, this happens.
We just had our first child.
So, I mean, it's like taking away our tax credit for our son.
As far as I can see, they're taxing the poor.
Yeah, you're fined for it.
That's nice.
We really can't afford it.
They're dirty.
The dirty truth is, the Democrats have been taxing the poor since they've been the poor.
Who do you think gets you?
Who do you think gets taxed by Democrats?
Who really?
It's the poor.
If you are poor and you turn your life over to Democrats, what happens to you?
You stay poor.
So who is it that's helping the poor?
The poor do get taxed.
They are taxed of their humanity.
They are taxed of whatever wealth they have.
And the chance to acquire wealth is severely restricted.
The worst thing that ever happened to the poor is liberals.
Liberals thrive on poverty.
Socialists are empowered by it.
Without poverty, there's no need for these people.
Sad truth.
Hope you have a wonderful weekend.
An emailer with a great idea.
The vernacular monologues by Sheila Jackson Lee.
All right, folks.
Some time off.
And it is leisure time off, not working tomorrow or Friday.
But Mark Stein will be here.
And I've right here a couple of stacks, the golf stack and football news stack.
And some things I didn't get to about Dancing with the Stars.
All for him.
So you won't be left out.
You won't miss anything in those three areas.
▲
Export Selection