All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 10, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:51
November 10, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Say, folks, apparently this afternoon, the uh the chairman of the uh White House uh the deficit commission, uh fiscal commission, this is Irkson Bowles and Alan Simpson, babe.
Uh apparently the draft report of their recommendations for reducing budget deficits in the coming years is due out this afternoon.
The draft report.
It's called the Chairman's Mark.
Short for markup.
It's uh authored by Irkson Bowles and Alan Simpson.
And uh supposed to be relieved this afternoon.
Anyone have any questions about what this report's going to say?
I already told you what's going to be in it.
Just there's two words, tax increases.
I don't care that income, whatever, there are going to be tax increases in there.
And of course, this is going to be a godsend to the White House and Congress because they're all going to be able to say, hey, we had nothing to do with it.
This is a blue ribbon committee, and they've been studying it.
Now, their report is not mandated.
I mean, we don't have we're not required to implement it.
And in fact, the final report, which is not due till December, representing recommendations to Congress.
Recommendations, suggestions, would require the assent of 14 of the 18 members of the commission.
Eighteen of them on their 14 have to agree.
That's I'm probably that'll not be a problem.
And we'll have tax increases and I'd probably throw in some bones, like raising the retirement age for Social Security, or yeah, they'll do something on the entitlement side.
It'll throw a bone in there.
Uh it will not be accepted, of course.
The tax increases will.
Uh, but the suggestion on the spinning, though, nothing's ever happened, it'll be thrown in there for the appearance of balance.
And uh propriety and uh uh nonpartisanship, and so forth and so on.
You wait and see.
I I just I got a bunch of emails.
Why were you so mean to the college student?
I wasn't mean to the college student.
I just don't think, and this is just look at folks, we all have bad days.
I'm just I'm I'm gonna I'm gonna razor thin trigger here today.
Yeah, all we all have these things that that uh bug us beneath the surface.
Some days we're able to forget them.
Uh just shove them aside that they don't they don't get to the conscious level.
But this for some reason, these protests over in the UK, these long-haired, maggot-in-fisted dope smoking, worthless students, caterwalling about tuition increases.
Has just taken me beyond the boiling point here of everybody in the world wanting something for nothing.
Or not everybody, but so many wanting something for nothing.
Expecting something for nothing.
The concept of paying for what you have seems to escape all kinds of people.
And it just one of these we all have what do you call them, um pet peeves.
This is this is more than a pet peeve of mine, and today it's just it's just hit me.
So I'm already irritated and agitated.
I feel like I've been worked over by a community organizer.
And then I didn't have to hear about how the guy who wants to ban light bulbs is not a big government guy, and I'm saying, sorry.
That doesn't compute to me.
One of the first things a Democrat Congress did when they were sworn in and took the oath in 2007 was this light bulb ban.
So I think symbolically, one of the first things we ought to do is repeal it.
Repeal this light bulb ban.
This is not the business of the especially with all this predicated on a hoax, an utter hoax.
Man-made global warming.
The idea, it insults my intelligence that so many people can be made to believe that light Bulbs could destroy or irreparably harm something as complex and out of our control as the climate.
I don't care if there are billions of light bulbs on at the same time.
I don't care.
It's not a factor.
Crying out loud.
We got a missile.
We can't even figure out what it was.
We can't figure out where it came from.
And they're telling us not to worry about it, even though they don't have the slightest clue what it is.
Bottom line is they do know what it is, and they don't think we can handle being told what it is.
They know what it is.
For crying out, we got satellites all over the world to pinpoint this kind of thing.
And now we've got the stupid TSA, big cis, all the irradiation and crotch grabs, people getting on airplanes and we're gonna wear latex gloves for cavity searches now, for people getting on airplanes, uh, under the guise of preventing terrorism and so forth.
I mean, no matter where you look, these incompetent SOBs are trying to take over every aspect of our lives.
And the pilots, you know, that's very seldom I side with unions, but the pilots here are saying, I we we object to this.
We're not gonna subject us to this kind of radiation, this kind of search.
Every time we get on a flight that we're gonna pilot around the country wherever it's gonna go.
And the uh flight attendants, you know, flight attendants are upset because of in some cases I have I have heard that the that the flight attendants are being made to raise their skirts in front of people all these searches are taking place.
Now, back in the old days, that would have been okay, but today you don't want to see that.
So I I have to side with these with these people that that um are objecting to it.
Here, here's some more idiocy.
To me, it's idiocy.
Now, this is a story from the Washington Post.
The headline, GOP budget cuts would hurt research, say the National Institutes of Health.
So here we go.
Here we go.
The American people have spoken.
We got a bloated government.
You know, all these journalists, I had a good friend of mine make a point to me the other day.
All these journalists running around saying, okay, well, where would you cut the budget, Mr. Lemba?
Where would you cut it?
It's so easy to cut the budget, and then all these Republicans are being asked on TV, where would you cut it?
Hey, you journalists.
Where did they cut your budget?
Your newspaper, your TV network.
They cut your budget, and what did they prove?
You're still in business.
Your business was inflated with a bunch of unnecessary, overpaid, bloated pap.
Your business cut one-third of the workforce, and you're still in business.
Now, news week might have sold for a buck and debt, but it's still out there plugging away.
I don't know for how long.
You journalists know full well there's room for cuts.
Now get this.
Spending cuts proposed by the man who is likely to become the new House Majority leader, would reduce scientists' chances of winning U.S. grants by nearly half, demoralizing researchers and slowing development of new drugs, according to the director of the National Institutes of Health.
So Boehner doesn't even have the gavel yet.
And here comes the Washington Post moving in.
You better not cut.
You better not cut the National Institutes of Health.
Now, what is hypocritical about this?
Here, let me well let me read you another paragraph, and maybe you'll figure it out here.
Republicans taking control of the House next year would roll back funding to agencies, including NIH, to fiscal 2008 levels.
We're not starving them.
We're not breaking the bank.
We're not cutting them.
We're just going two years for crying out loud.
It's a proposal by Eric Cantor, likely to become the Republican majority leader.
This would equate to a 4.3% or 1.3 billion dollar cut to the agency's $30.8 billion.
Okay, so 30.8 going to become what?
28.5.
Big whoop.
You're not being put out of business.
And we don't have the money to pay you anyway.
We are broke.
We have a budget deficit of 1.6 trillion dollars.
But the hypocrisy of this is.
Now here, one more paragraph.
NIH funded research led to the development of drugs that include the cancer therapies Avastin, sold by Roach Holdings, uh Novartis, A.G.'s Gleveck, said Jennifer Zider, lobbyist for the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology and Bethesda, blah, blah, blah.
So all of a sudden, the Washington Post comes to the defense of big drug makers.
The Washington Post.
After years and years and years of trying to destroy big drug, of trying to destroy big pharma.
I mean, starting back in the 90s, the Clintons targeted big pharma.
They made it a point to target big pharma, just like the target big food, big retail, big oil.
They're profiting on the backs of the sick.
They're charging way too much for their drugs.
They don't care about real illness.
They don't want people to get well.
They want people to continually stay sick, so they can have more drugs and more profit.
And now, all of a sudden, before Boehner's even sworn in, Big Pharma is now one of the biggest victims to ever come down the pike.
Because the Republicans are about to be in charge.
The irony of this is just too juicy.
These drugs, these big profit makers...
For the evil people of big pharma and their venal lobbyists.
Don't forget them.
These are the very criminals that Obama, the Democrats have been attacking for the last four years.
Last four years, hell, last 20.
Big pharma's a bunch of criminals.
Big pharma's a bunch of crooks, just like Archer Daniels Midland, big food, just like Walmart, all these people on the Democrat Party's enemies list.
But now that the Republicans were elected to roll back some of this waste and profligate spending, and a meager 1.8 billion dollars is going to be cut from NIH.
All of a sudden, Big Pharma is a big victim of the evil Republicans.
So it's stuff like this today.
And I just I got here today, my fuse already short, and this stuff practically lit it.
Back in a second.
Now what did I tell you?
What did I tell you?
We just got a little peek here at the deficit reduction panel.
Some of their suggestions are one of their ideas is to reduce social security cost of living expenses.
Hey, seasoned citizens know that for two years there haven't been any already.
This is the second year there's no cola, even though there is inflation.
Now, seasoned citizens are going to be taking to the streets just like the students over in the UK once they hear about this.
You watch, mark my words.
And back to this NIH thing.
What in the world are taxpayers doing funding research for big pharma?
Why does Big Pharma have to go to the National Institute for Health to get research money?
And don't forget Avaston.
Do you remember that drug's been in the news lately?
On this show.
Now here's this story from the Washington Post.
Oh no, we got to keep Avastin.
Avastin's a wonderful magnet.
They're getting ready to cut Avvastin.
The FDA is getting ready to ban the thing because how much it costs.
Remember, it's supposedly a miracle cancer drug.
Uh I think for breast cancer that's had some other applications in other types of cancer.
It can cost as much as 14,000 a dose.
We've had people call here about it.
The FDA is getting ready to ban it because of that.
Now all of a sudden, Avastin may as well be Mother Teresa.
Because the Republicans are in charge.
The difference is seasoned citizens have actually paid into Social Security.
They got a reason to complain.
These little money grubbing students haven't paid into anything over in the UK.
Running around to listen at rotten British rock music anymore, expecting all this stuff to be given to them, tearing up the town in the process.
Ray in Livermore, California, great to have you on the EIB network.
Welcome, sir.
Rush, it's great to have you.
Your national assets, your uh busy pointing out how everything Obama is saying is in complete opposition to what he's doing, or better yet, you shall know them by their fruits.
Right.
And I want to point to the fact that he keeps saying that he wants to help small businesses.
And I am a small business.
I've been at this for twenty years, Rush, and I I think it's it's nothing but a damn lie because what he's doing, everything he's doing is hurting small business.
And and here's my reasoning small business, uh we're not mandated to give benefits or benefit packages or government controls because our size is so small we we we come underneath that.
We're not uh beholden to government contracts typically because we're too small to handle some of these contracts and we're not beholden to unions and union contracts.
Therefore that puts a target on our back because we cannot be controlled or better said in the words of Rush Limbaugh we are rugged individuals.
We don't want government help and we don't want government intrusion in our lives or our businesses.
Well you got it you got it sir.
Oh no you got it.
You got it they're running your business as it is and they're they're coming up with policies here.
You know they're upset with you because you're not borrowing any money.
Would you explain to people why that is totally irrelevant to you.
Well because um in business you don't in the small business especially you don't borrow money to make payroll you don't borrow money to grow your business when you don't have any customers coming through the door.
Right.
You don't when you get no demand for your business why the hell are you going to borrow money for it?
And we don't exist to offer benefit packages and paid days off to people as this administration believes that businesses exist to employ people but American people we exist to provide you with the best products and services at competitive prices and government has nothing to do with that well it's not just Obama that believes you exist to provide people health care.
It's half the people that work for you a lot of mo it's a sad reality I don't know if it's half, but a lot of people think the purpose of a corporation is to keep a town together.
Uh purpose of a corporation is to provide healthcare benefits.
Purpose of a corporation is to have sick days.
Purpose of a corporation to have paid vacations well talk to some of these human resource people who do the interviewing and ask them what the first questions the employee asks him Brainerd Minnesota.
Richard you're next great to have you rush Limbaugh the open line Friday edition on thir well we're not doing open line Friday but it it feels like it which is why I said it how are you?
Fine diddles from flyover country rush thank you sir.
Do you remember when Obama was brought into the White House and Bush showed him around for the first time took him into the war room and all that when he came out of there like he'd seen a ghost I I don't remember this I'm sorry.
He came off with the deer on the head dip look I think this missile thing is completely known about by the administration.
That's why they're not in panic mode.
Well they're probably not in any way shape or form able to handle it anyway but um I believe that they're in complete understanding of what was going on out there on the ocean.
There's a place out there called Point Magu missile range.
Oh yeah it's restricted classified and they don't have to tell anybody what they do out there.
Right.
And if you get close you are sent away it's not like Area 51 where you can park on a hill with your binoculars and see what's going on in town.
I believe they know what's going on otherwise we would be in some kind of mode in this country because that looked like an ICBM going out.
Well that was a large rocket there are only two countries who would have shot this missile off without telling us China being one and Russia being the other.
The only two countries that would do this without telling us I believe the administration knows what's going on.
Nobody's come forward and said anything and if you call the FAA or the Air Force they're not going to know anything anyway.
Anybody you're gonna get on the phone is not going to tell you it's in that category if we'd tell you but we'd have to kill you.
Well, I know.
That's why the thing is very suspicious to me.
Don't worry about it.
Don't worry about it.
Nothing to worry about it.
We don't know what it was, but there's nothing to worry about.
Uh the two don't go together.
Bobby, San Antonio, Texas, welcome to the EIB network, sir.
You know, as I sit here and I listen to you pass judgment on to others for the way they look or substance abuse.
I think to myself, that's really funny.
You know, talk about hypocrisy coming from an addict like yourself.
You say you love it.
What do you mean uh talking about the way they look?
Yeah, you do it all the time.
I sit here and I listen to your these really bad parodies that you guys play while people are on hold.
They're really mean and nasty and they're personal and they're wrong.
You pick on J Jeff Jackson.
That's a man who stood with Martin Luther King.
He's practically a prophet, and I'm sure if Martin was a lie today, you would have parodies of him too.
Because we know exactly what you're about, Mr. Limbaugh.
What am I about, sir?
What am I about to tell me, Mr. New Cafe, just exactly what am I about, sir?
Well, you talk about giving tax breaks, more tax breaks to the richest of the rich.
If this country needs you, for a person like yourself who's taken so much while giving nothing back, while giving nothing back, when is it your turn to give something back to the country that you claim to love so, sir?
When will it be time for you to care about someone else other than your own?
Let me tell you something.
Let me tell you something.
I have given these lives.
I have given back.
Take this lame brain off the I have given back to my country and to my fellow citizens more in one year than you are gonna earn in your worthless life, Mr. New Castrati.
And if you ever get famous, we'll do a parody on you too, because it would bring big time yucks.
You know, folks, all the information in the world cannot overcome, never will overcome, willful stupidity.
Wait till his wait till he finds out his tuition is going up.
Wait till he has to well he finds out he's had to pay for his tuition.
Then he's gonna really be out of sorts.
Let's see, who's next?
Uh Pat in Akron, Ohio.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
How are you doing?
Very well, sir.
Thank you.
I've listened to you since you were out in California.
I stayed out in California for over twenty years, and I'm back home now in Akron.
And I'm over sixty years, sorry for the word.
Well, we're gonna bleep that out, not because of the bleep it, Mike.
Just hit the then tell me when you All right, okay.
Sir, we're gonna protect you from yourself on that.
It's not the fact that you mentioned concentration camps.
Um I apologize for that.
I just get so hot when I hear these these.
I know a typical spoiled little brat rotten, he doesn't have the slightest idea what he's talking about.
That's exactly what I'm saying.
And those are the kind of people that were marching at Grant Park on election, I think kind of people electing Obama, kind of people supporting Obama and and Pelosi, the kind of people that are taking this country down the drain.
And and they're everywhere.
They're on the radio, they're on a TV, they're they're on all the channels on the TV.
There's only one channel that's worth watching, but I won't mention that.
Well, let me tell you something not on the golf course, which is why I go there.
You won't find little snivelling brats like that on the golf course.
Well, you generally don't find them where where you have to be out doing any kind of hard physical work either.
They tend to steer away from that.
Uh true.
Very true.
Well, look, and I I'm I'm is there something else that you wanted to call about, and that guy just distracted you, or is that it?
No, that was it.
Uh, he I just heard him and I got so hot I had a call you and I appreciate everything you do, Rush.
Well, thank you very much.
Uh appreciate that.
More than you know.
Uh Santa Barbara, California, this is Tom.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Hey, is it a badge of honor or part of the business plan at CNN to hemorrhage money every single year for twenty years?
I mean, I don't understand.
You you talked about them earlier and how they pretend to be uh middle of the road, but gosh, I haven't watched that station.
I'm 46 and you know, I haven't watched that station or any of the mainstream kind of network stations or cable news.
Uh let me clue in college.
Let me include people into what you're calling about because they might have heard it.
Uh CNN is uh running a new promo campaign in which they're trying to position themselves as unbiased centrists.
They're ripping into Fox or being biased to the right.
They're ripping into MSNBC for being biased to the left.
And they say if you want to have a real news, uh uh join them.
So I had a guy, a research guy check into the political donations of people that work at CNN.
Can't find any Republicans or Republican causes that they've donated to.
Now, Chris, what's his name?
Olberman, he got suspended from MSNBC for a couple of days because he donated to three Democrat candidates.
That's not why he got suspended.
The reason they suspended him is because he used his own money to do it.
Liberals are not supposed to use their own money.
So he did.
Now they put him back on the air because the new Castrati complained and moaned that their spokesman was taken off the air.
Your question about CNN, I've been asking it about all of these left-wing news outlets, be it magazines, newspapers, TV networks, or what have you.
They are hemorrhaging money.
They are hemorrhaging audience, viewers, readers, and so forth.
And they look at it almost as a badge of honor.
As though the people that they have left are the truly smart people, the truly enlightened.
Uh it's it's the news business is the one business in the world where the customers always wrong.
And I just it it it boggles my mind.
I'm I'm like you.
I the these people haven't the slightest concept of reality.
If they really believe that they are unbiased at CNN, if they really believe that they are objective, they really believe the only difference between MSNBC and CNN is that MSNBC tells you what they are.
They proudly admit they're insane.
They proudly admit they are on the lunatic leftist fringe.
It's a badge of honor to them.
CNN's in the same place.
They're just as leftist lunatic fringe, except they won't admit it.
And so people know that they're not real.
And if you're watching somebody in the news business is not real, you know they're not real, then you're not going to trust what they're telling you to be real.
Plus, they're boring.
They're just flat-out bored.
But I mean, this the presumptuousness, the arrogance and the conceit, we're non-biased.
We're objective.
We are CNN.
Uh the the distance that they have fallen from their glory days is just stunning.
And I do.
I I put it uh within the context of, you know, I'm in the broadcasting business, just as they are.
They they might want to say they're in the journalism business, uh, the news business, and they in a way are, but they are also, even their cable, they're broadcasters.
I mean, there are certain skill sets that you have to succeed at.
And if you don't, you're gone.
If you don't if if this program had lost 20% of the audience when CNN, I'd be gone.
I would take myself away.
I say, you know what?
I've well, I made it take myself away, but I certainly say, what am I doing wrong?
I wouldn't blame you.
I wouldn't blame the audience.
I wouldn't, boy, my audience has gotten stupid.
But that's what CNN does.
Or they blame Fox.
They blame Roger Ailes.
Or they blame MSNBC.
It's just everything I've known about about the competitive nature of this business seems not to exist on the left-wing side of it.
It's a place where failure is rewarded.
Failure is triumphed.
Failure is heralded.
It makes no sense whatsoever.
By the way, I'm told I trailed off when I was making the point about CNN employees who they donate to.
I got a huge, a huge.
If I printed this out, it would be 10 pages Of CNN employees.
And they're called journalists on here.
Not all the names you'd recognize, but they're field producers, uh, human resources people, uh, behind the scenes employees at CNN, and the the people they donate to are exclusively Democrats.
Yeah, they want to try to tell us that they are centrist, that they are not MSNBC.
You got Solidad O'Brien on there, you have Paul McGall, of course, the forehead we know he's gonna donate to Democrat causes.
He's a Democrat first before he's uh CNN, but all these producers, field technicians, camera operators.
And when you're talking about producers and editors, I mean, these are the people that are every bit as liberal as the on-air people are.
They put these packages together, they do the assignments, they send the brain-dead journalists out to the various stories they cover, half of them write the scripts, that the brain-dead journalists are reading on camera, and they're donating to Democrats, left and right, local and national figures.
They want to try to tell us that they're straight down the middle news people.
They have lost half of their audience just in this year, in this past year.
And they fired one person somewhere in Louisiana.
Tom, you're next on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hello.
Hey, Rush.
I'm uh proud to be a fan of yours, and uh I'm a federal employee, and I'm curious.
Do you know why?
Why?
Because you're absolutely right.
Government has become so bloated that it ceases to function.
Take, for example, a lot of the federal laws that we operate under, okay?
The National Environmental Policy Act, the National Historic Preservation Act.
All of these laws have something in common.
They act and are created with the end point that the federal agency that's in charge or implementing these has the final decision-making capacity on these.
They reach out to Native Americans, they reach out to disenfranchised groups, quote unquote.
And the end result is that the federal agency makes the decision.
So what do you have?
You have bureau after bureau and agency after agency that has teams of people to write documents that they ultimately make the decision on.
So what does that mean?
That means we're wasting time and we're wasting money for the illusion that we give the public a voice in government.
Yeah, well, it's just the exact opposite.
I mean, you not only are wasting time and money, but what they're doing is exerting control.
Exactly.
It's all about power.
It's all about power, it's all about control.
And by the way, the um uh the new unemployment numbers are out here.
Jobless claims fell sharply to a four-month low.
Now, AP in this story neglects to mention that last week's unemployment claims were quietly revised upwards.
This week, there's it's a federal holiday tomorrow.
And that's why we're getting tomorrow's unemployment news today.
What is the federal holiday tomorrow?
Veterans Day, right.
Fewer people applied for unemployment aid last week, the third drop in four weeks, and evidence that the job market showing signs of life if the decline can now AP screws up because they put this positive story out after the Democrats get shellacked.
But nevertheless, I've mentioned this once before, I'm gonna mention it again.
The three wealthiest counties per capita now are the three counties surrounding Washington, D.C. There's one of them, Maryland, and two in Virginia.
And the story, the average pay now for a federal employee is a little bit north of 150,000.
USA Today has an article that the number of Fed workers making more than 150,000 dollars has gone up tenfold since 2005.
And these people are all gonna have lifetime pensions, and they're gonna have lifetime benefits and lifetime this and that, and then you you you you propose cutting some of this down the road.
You look at the holy hell that these people start raising.
Mr. Limbaugh, Mr. Limbaugh, what's wrong?
I thought you wanted people to do, well, what's wrong with people making 150,000 dollars a year in good pick?
Well, I'll tell you what's wrong with it.
When the people paying them are making an average of 75 or 50.
That's what's wrong with it.
That's what's wrong.
When the people paying them are making half of what they make.
And then let's not even talk about production.
Because the government does not create wealth.
The government does not produce wealth.
It confiscates it.
And then redistributes it.
John in Widmore, California.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hey Rush.
Hey.
Uh greetings.
Hey, I listen to you all the time.
Uh been listening, you know, I'm 70 years old, and uh I live in uh like it's like you said in Whitmore.
And you mentioned about uh uh the only uh the way for California to solve its problems to raise taxes.
Now they're gonna run with that.
We're conservative in Northern California.
I'd like for you to separate the two because from uh Sacramento North, it's very pretty much conservative.
No, no, no.
I've been to Humboldt County.
You can't tell me.
Well, you you got one town, you're talking Humboldt, yeah.
Uh but the majority of Northern California is conservative.
You know, the uh we're uh you know, we vote conservative, and what they're gonna do is they'll say, Well, Rush said raise your taxes, so they'll raise the taxes.
We're taxed out of this place already, you know.
You can't sell homes here.
They're uh they're you know, they they're values going down so fast we can't move out of California because we can't sell our homes, you know.
Where would where would you go if you could?
Well, I like uh parts of Texas, parts of Arizona.
You know, I like all kinds of uh other places, you know, that you know, are but we're we're really taxed heavy.
I'm I'm a businessman, I'm a retired businessman.
Yeah.
And uh I would never try to start a business in California.
I'm surprised Meg Whitman don't pull all of her stuff out of here, you know.
Well, I know I don't give anything to really worry about.
California will always do the opposite of what I say.
Oh, uh well, I I don't know about that.
You're pretty right, you know.
The only thing is uh they will run with uh they listen to you, you know, and they'll run with uh anything you say, like uh the the answers to raise taxes, and all they'll do is hurt the the forty percent of us that uh you know pay tax.
Well, you're not alone.
I mean, I'm I'm uh I'm hearing from people like you in my email in uh large numbers uh today who are really afraid that I'm going to be listened to or that California authorities they even Limbaugh realizes now we have no choice but then to raise taxes.
And I admit I'm being a little selfish.
Yeah, I agree with that.
And then and New York's next, and then Illinois.
Yeah.
And and uh I I just these people in California keep voting for what they get.
Yeah, but I I don't think uh you you can say they do, but uh I I'm sure that forty, forty-five percent vote the other way.
And you when you throw us all into one category, you're you're talking like we're all a bunch of dumb idiots.
Well, I'm sorry, I know it sounds that way, but when not one incumbent in that state loses.
I agree in the state assembly, not and then you go back thirty years for moonbeam.
Yeah, I agree with that too.
You know, I uh you know, actually uh uh forty years ago, or when he was in last time, I can't remember, but uh I actually voted for him back then.
Well see.
Which was which was kind of stupid, but uh, you know, it's uh you know, we live and learn.
Too late.
Anyway, I I'm sorry.
I'm I'm just being flippant.
I I hear what you're saying.
I really do.
I'll think about it revising my idea.
And I'm um way long here, gotta go.
Back after this.
Okay, two hours of broadcast excellence in the can on the way over to the holding tank.
We keep artifacts for the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum.
One hour remaining.
▲
Export Selection