All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 1, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:38
November 1, 2010, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Happy to have you with us.
It's Rush Limbaugh.
This is the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
Email address, LRushbo, EIBnet.com.
Turn on any media outlet, particularly television.
Read any drive-by news publication.
You are looking live at panic.
Here's a story in West Virginia.
This from the Charleston Gazette.
Have to do something about this.
From the Ohio River to the Eastern Panhandle, West Virginians are fed up.
They're disappointed in their politicians.
They are disgusted with how they're behaving.
They're frustrated their taxes, helped fund bailouts they'd never get.
They're tired of career politicians, yet wary of those who want to replace them.
But that anger makes them unpredictable.
Interviews with dozens of would-be voters from Parkersburg to Charlestown, West Virginia, suggest that many are just as likely to cast a protest vote on Election Day as they are to stay home.
We need some Americans instead of Democrats and Republicans as Ed Kinney, 57, hanging out with friends at the Talkington gun shop in New Martinsville.
Isn't this typical for an AP story?
Go to a gun shop.
It's all about the angry voter.
Nothing we have works, says Ed Kinney.
Every time they come up with something else, it works less.
I'm just not happy with our government's doing.
I'm going to vote against whoever's in there.
The problem is no one is an incumbent in the state's Senate race.
As the incumbent died and they're vying for his seat, there's nobody in office that they can vote against.
They're really ticked off in West Virginia.
Nobody to vote against.
So they might just stay home.
Kinney doesn't care for either of the...
Now, this is an attempt to skew the race for Manchin.
There's no question what this is.
Classic illustration of the media setting an agenda trying to shape the outcome of events.
Mr. Kinney, you've got a candidate.
His name is John Racy.
Based on what you're saying here in this AP story, you got a candidate.
You got a candidate who wants to do exactly what you want happen, want to happen in Washington.
His name is John Racy.
If you want more of the same, if you want what has you mad, vote for your governor.
If you want a smaller paycheck, if you want that gun shop closed down someday, vote Democrat.
If you want to be prohibited from smoking a cigar in that gun shop, vote Democrat.
It's very simple here.
You don't like what's going on, vote Democrat.
Or vote Republican.
It's very simple.
If you like what's going on, vote Democrat.
It's really no more complicated than that.
There's one party that got us here.
Maybe a tenth of another party, but the one party, the Democrats, have doubled down on failure and have made it happen.
If you like what's going on and you want more of it, there's only one thing to do, and that's vote Democrat.
If you don't like it, then don't.
From, let's see, this is USA Today Gallup.
Republicans appear poised to win big on Tuesday.
This is the story that we had last week that the Republicans have a 15 percentage point lead, 55 to 40, in the generic ballot.
That's the last survey prior to the election, October 28th through 31, 1,539 likely voters finds it 52 to 55 percent of them prefer the Republican candidate, 40 to 42 for the Democrat candidate on the national generic ballot.
This depends on turnout.
Low turnout, the numbers change, high turnout.
The higher the turnout, the better for the Republicans, obviously.
And that's another thing they're trying to do is diminish turnout tomorrow.
You're even going to see weather forecasts for rain when there's not a cloud in the sky.
You are.
You will see, not maybe from the weather guys, the Democrats are going to, yeah, we're expecting bad weather to polls tomorrow when it's going to be sunny and warm.
Anything they can.
Now, in the midst of all this, what is happening to our dear leader?
In the midst of all this, where is the man who is going to change all of this?
In the midst of all of this panic, where is the guy responsible for it?
What's he doing?
What are they saying about him?
I know he's giving out Halloween candy.
Can you imagine that answering the door?
He's got a trick-or-treat.
I'm scared and run the other way.
Scarecrow answers the door.
Handing out trick or treat candy.
Well, let's take a look.
I had a little Obama stack here.
This is from thehill.com.
Headline: Thousands of empty seats for the last Democrat voter rally by Obama and Bitney.
And this is in Cleveland.
This is where Frank Lutz's focus group on Hannity was on Thursday night.
And I'm telling you, there was one person in that focus group that was for Obama.
And if that focus group that Lunch put together was, in fact, a cross-section, an accurate cross-section of Cleveland, I mean, it's over.
The Democrats don't have a choice, a chance.
And there's even a picture of all the empty seats.
The arena where President Obama and Vice President Bitney are making their final appeal to Democrats to get out and vote on Tuesdays, elections was far from capacity Sunday afternoon.
The crowd estimate stands at 8,000 in an arena that seats just over 13,000.
And a couple thousand empty seats are visible above the stage where Obama and Bitney rallied supporters.
I'm sure the crowds were just too confused and afraid to show up.
I mean, that's what Obama's saying.
Voters are going to vote this way because they're confused and they're afraid.
They're probably just, you know, if they were handing out candy, which is what he does best, by the way.
Nobody passes out candy better than Obama.
But he couldn't give it away in Cleveland yesterday.
New York Post, page six, a struggling mother who wrote to President Obama about her financial hardship and received a handwritten response from Obama saying things will get better has had to sell the letter to an autograph dealer to help pay for a house.
Jennifer Klein, 28 years old from Monroe, Michigan, wrote to Obama describing how she and her husband had lost their jobs in 2007.
She wrote, I lost my job, my health benefits, and my self-worth in a matter of days.
Then she was diagnosed with two types of skin cancer, and she had no health insurance.
She signed up for Medicaid.
Treatment was successful.
She went back to college after her unemployment benefit was extended.
She added, in just a couple of years, we'll be in a great spot.
Obama was shown the letter by an aide on January 8th.
He wrote back on a White House-headed card that said, Thanks for the very kind and inspiring letter.
I know times are tough, but knowing there are folks out there like you and your husband gives me confidence things will be getting better.
But things did not improve for Jennifer Klein, who's now agreed to sell the letter to an autograph dealer for $7,000.
The autograph dealer told page six, the letter is a historical document.
It's very hard for her to part with it, very timely considering the elections, but I don't think she's disillusioned with Obama.
This is just about surviving in practicality.
She's selling it to pay for a house, which I think is poetic justice.
That's a quote from the autograph dealer.
$7,000 to pay for a house.
Selling a letter Obama wrote her for money for $7,000.
She should have held out.
I got $2.5 million for a letter written by Harry Reid on eBay.
She could have done better than $7,000.
Operation Reverse Chaos.
Associated Press two days ago.
Democrat voters closely divided over whether President Obama should be challenged within the party for a second term in 2012.
This is an Associated Press Knowledge Network's poll.
That glum assessment carries over into the nation at large, which is similarly divided over whether Obama should be a one-termer.
A real Democrat challenge to Obama seems unlikely at this stage.
Ha ha ha, that's what they say.
And his reelection bid's a long way off, but the findings underscore how disenchanted his party has grown heading into the congressional elections Tuesday.
Among all 2008 voters, 51% say Obama deserves to be defeated.
In November 2012, 47% support his reelection.
Now, 5147 AP says that's a tie.
Margin of error tie.
Among Democrats, 47% say Obama should be challenged in 2012.
51% say he shouldn't be.
Those favoring a contest include most who backed Hillary Robham Clinton's face-off against Obama.
Operation Reverse Chaos.
Operation Reverse Chaos showing up.
And Obama, ladies and gentlemen, was heckled.
This is USA Today.
President Obama, having a hard enough time with the Republicans this election season, had to deal with putative supporters in Connecticut on Saturday.
As Obama launched into his stump speech at an arena in Bridgeport, a group of protesters began heckling him over funding for the global fight against AIDS.
Liberal hecklers would not let him speak.
We have audio soundbites.
Here's the first.
Excuse me, excuse me, excuse me, everybody.
Let me just say this.
Excuse me, young people.
Excuse me.
Let me just say this.
You know, these folks have been, you've been appearing at every rally we've been doing, and we're funding Global AIDS, and the other side is not.
Do it make a lot more sense for you guys to go to the folks who aren't interested in funding global AIDS and shadow bed rally.
Obama heckled for not spending enough on AIDS, lying about the fact that Republicans don't have Bush, I think, is responsible for more AIDS funding in Africa than any other president.
I want to know, are liberal hecklers racists?
Are liberal hecklers angry?
Are liberal hecklers, that's what they would say about us if we were heckling.
By the way, whenever Obama says folks, he means enemy.
Keep that in mind.
The president of the United States called a certain number of Americans enemies, his enemies.
The sound bites continued.
The hecklers were on both sides of Obama.
He had them all around him.
And they were behind both teleprompters, both teleprompter screens.
That's what made it impossible for Obama to continue.
The hecklers got in the way of what was on the teleprompters.
All right.
All right, you guys a major point.
You guys are major point.
Let's go.
Now look, let me just understand.
Everybody, we're all right.
Come on, guys.
All right, everybody.
Come on.
All right, everybody.
Hey.
Listen up.
Listen up.
Look, listen up.
Listen up, everybody.
Having a tough time organizing the community there.
Barack Hussein Obama, a little trouble organizing the community.
That sounded like I heard some real anger in that room.
Real anger.
I wonder if the drive-bys report real anger.
He was actually engaging hecklers.
Why didn't somebody come in and remove them?
Well, they did, but I mean, it took them long enough.
Who got fired for letting this go on here?
There's even more.
Obama finally addressed the hecklers again.
This is one of the great things about Democrats is we always like to be heard.
And that's a good thing.
That's part of what this democracy is all about.
The question we've got is, which party is most likely to actually fund it in ways that help people around the world?
All right.
Well, it sounds like the people at that rally don't think it's you.
I mean, that's not a Republican rally where it is people showing up saying there's not enough being done for AIDS.
Now, let's go to Cleveland, where we've told you a half-empty arena in Cleveland, S-E-I-U, Cleveland.
Here's Obama.
This is yesterday afternoon on Halloween.
We've got to get Cleveland out to vote.
We've got to get everybody in Ohio out to vote.
And in Ohio, you can vote early.
There is early voting just a few blocks from here.
So you can go right after this rally if you haven't voted.
Because if everyone who fought for change in 2008 shows up to vote in 2010, we will win this election.
I am confident of that.
You can't find a more Democrat town in Cleveland and nobody showed up.
And that crowd, compared that crowd to the one in Bridgeport, all ticked off about AIDS funding.
And now, last night in Arlington, Texas.
I think this, by the way, not being talked about, but people who saw this, who also saw Obama over the weekend, believe me, People who saw George W. Bush before game four of the World Series throughout the first pitch.
Contrasting, there was no mom jeans.
He wasn't wearing mom jeans.
He didn't throw like a girl.
He didn't call where he was Kaminsky Park.
This is before Game 4 of the World Series in Arlington, Texas.
The PA announcer introducing the former president.
We welcome the 41st President of the United States of America, George Herbert Rutger Bush.
And accompanying his father and calling out tonight's ceremonial first pitch for game four of the 106 World Series.
Please welcome the 43rd...
I asked, where has Obama been during all this?
Well, he was again in Cleveland.
We've got to get Cleveland out to vote.
We've got to get everybody in Ohio out to vote.
And in Ohio, you can vote early.
There is early voting just a few blocks from here.
So you can go right after this rally if you haven't voted.
Because if everyone who fought for change in 2008 shows up to vote in 2010, we will win this election.
I am confident of that.
Meanwhile, the stadium in Arlington, Texas was going crazy because George Bush 43 was introduced.
Back after this, don't go away.
Here are some headlines to back up the opening hour of this program, Panic, Dispiritedness, doing everything they can to depress you from the AP.
Headline, Harvard, Tea Party movement alienating young voters.
No, it's not.
Obama is alienating young voters.
It's young voters that Obama's begging to come out.
Young voters who voted for him in 2008, who now are showing no interest in voting.
It's Obama who is alienating young voters.
It's the Democrats who are alienating young voters.
It's not the Tea Party.
Slate.com, Jacob Weisberg, how the Republican Congress will abandon Tea Party ideas and legislate toward the center.
This is Politico.
Next for the GOP, stopping Palin.
Next for the GOP, stopping Palin.
Huge headline.
Trying to depress the Tea Party people.
And all this is doing is firing them up even more.
Top Republicans in Washington and in the national GOP establishment say the 2010 campaign highlighted an urgent task that they will begin in earnest as soon as the elections are over.
Stop Sarah Palin.
Who are we talking about here?
Colin Powell, Chuck Hagel, Trent Lott, Megan McCain, Lindsey Graham.
Who are we talking about?
Stopping Sarah Palin.
Who are we talking about here?
If you read the whole story, it's a way, very long story.
If you read the whole story, you find out there's really no there there.
It's a story with a headline.
Next for GOP leaders, stopping Palin.
They quote Michael Steele and so forth, but it's just about stopping you.
And this is from the New York Times Frank Rich.
I mean, I don't know how this guy crawls out of bed anymore.
I really don't.
The grand old plot against the Tea Party.
This Frank Rich piece may be the single most condescending article yet written about us, the country class, by the arrogant and ignorant of the drive-bys.
Back in just a second.
All right, we go to the phones now.
As promised, we're going to start Rio Rancho Pueblo, New Mexico.
This is Alicia.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Oh, Rush, this is such an honor, and I'm so nervous.
You don't sound nervous at all.
Oh, thank you.
I'm just urging everybody to get out and vote in all the close races.
Congressmen, senators.
No, no.
Get out and vote in all the slam dunk races.
Get out and vote in all of the races.
Yes, and all of them, that's true.
But we must sweep in because as bad as what's been done to us already with health care and the takeovers and everything, people have to ask themselves what's going to happen.
What else are they planning?
Like nationalizing our 401ks and IRAs.
That's on the agenda.
Well, now, that's fascinating you mention that because that's the next item up in my stack of stuff.
And I talked about this weeks ago, maybe even months ago, when Tom Dum Dungheap Harkin proposed this.
Now, before you continue, Alicia, let me refer to what she's talking about.
It's Mark Hemingway, the Washington Examiner.
Will the government outlaw your 401k?
It seems like an absurd possibility, yet earlier this month, two Democrat senators, Tom Harkin, Iowa, Bernie Sanders, Vermont, held a hearing on Capitol Hill exploring the possibility of doing just that.
On October 8th, the two senators from the Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee held a hearing on retirement security in America.
And among the proposals discussed was guaranteed retirement accounts or GRAs.
The purpose of the GRA proposal is simple, to force Americans to stop putting retirement savings money into 401ks and send the money to government instead.
Now, this has been in the works for a long time.
And I remember the first time I mentioned this on the program, Alicia, we were deluged with calls from Washington Times.
No, no, no, you totally misunderstand.
Nobody in the Democrat Party is talking about eliminating 401ks.
And they are.
Yes, they are.
And it's not stopping there.
They're also planning on going after your pension fund.
Yeah, your private pension fund right.
And I'm scared to death.
I get a private pension from Verizon.
And we saved, we lived below our income to save and put in our IRAs.
And now they want to nationalize it.
And the worst of it is the plan put forth by this woman, Giorducci or something, I'm not sure how to state Gilar Ducci, I think, for the White House is, okay, if they take all my IRAs, my husband's in my IRAs, we can't, whatever we spend, we can't spend it as we want.
They only want us to have a monthly allowance.
Exactly right.
We've talked about this in great detail.
They want to essentially take your IRA, excuse me, take your IRA IRA away from you and then give you back something like its current value at 2% interest.
Right.
And then you can only leave half of it to your heirs.
Right.
The government keeps half.
Folks, she is exactly right about this.
The GRA proposal from Harkin and Sanders is simple, to force Americans to stop putting their retirement savings money into private 401k accounts and send the money to the government instead.
The GRA, which is, again, the guaranteed retirement account, turn your 401k into a guaranteed retirement account.
The GRAs would eliminate the favorable tax treatment currently afforded to 401k plans.
What this is rooted in is eliminating the tax deduction that you get for the contribution to your 401k.
The Democrats think it's costing the government money.
Now, they came up with this idea of the 401k plan, but now it's costing them money, so they're going to get rid of it.
You know, you're allowed to put a certain percentage of your gross into your 401k without taxes on it, provided you don't withdraw it early.
They want to eliminate this.
They want to take the money away from you, eliminate the tax deduction for future contributions, and give you back 2% interest on what you've got.
That's essentially what it is.
GRAs You have, I need to find this in the website archives.
I remember discussing this in great detail, and I remember, seems like years ago, actually.
I know it was months ago, and I remember talking about this, and we got more hell from people in Washington saying this wasn't being discussed, that this wasn't being planned.
In fact, under Bush, there had been a move to increase the cap on 401ks.
And the Democrats stopped all of it.
This is social justice.
GRAs would eliminate the favorable tax treatment currently afforded to 401k plans and instead use those dollars to fund government-invested GRAs into which all employees would be required to contribute a portion of their salary.
Now, this is all spelled out in a letter signed by John Boehner and 12 other Republican representatives.
The letter urged opposition to this proposal.
It was sent to the Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, the Labor Secretary, Hilda Salise, in May.
I knew it goes back that form.
The Harkin-Sanders Help Committee hearing shows Democrats are ignoring critics of the proposal.
Now, guess who's behind it, though?
Unions.
The unions are behind this.
You might say, well, why?
Why are the unions pushing this?
Very simple.
The average union pension plan right now is only 62% funded.
The reason, and that's way below the point at which the government considers a pension plan endangered.
So there are estimates that suggest unions' multi-employer pension plans are underfunded by $165 billion and could be on the verge of collapse because all the money the union guys think has been stashed away for them has been spent.
The Reverend Jackson years ago talked about raiding pension accounts for social justice.
The union leaders see these retirement security ideas like GRAs as vehicles as a backdoor pension bailout to go get your 401k and add it to their pensions that are underfunded, thereby making their pensions whole.
In exchange, the government funds a retirement account for you, but you no longer are in charge of how much it is or what kind of tax deduction that you get.
I'm going to go back.
We're going to go back and find what I said about this for rushlimbaugh.com.
We have.
I'm just going to be in the process here of synthesizing it, editing it, and printing it out.
But the unions are behind this.
The unions and their Democrat friends in Congress are still pushing to get away, do away with your 401ks.
They essentially are looking for a bailout of their pension plans with your money.
That's what this boils down to.
And the Democrats hearken, and what's his face here, Sanders are telling you that they're saving your retirement.
Like putting a lockbox or putting it in a lockbox, saving your retirement, when in fact they're taking your money in your 401k and bailing out union allies with it.
That's the purpose of this.
I talked about this, I think, back in October of 2008.
I know, and I know it goes back two years, my memory.
Don't ever, don't ever doubt my memory.
Here, let me read to you the first part of my transcript from the show on October 24th, 2008.
And at the website, we entitle it, EIB Biden CEO Pensions Go First, and Your 401k will go next.
I want to talk to all of you who have 401ks or SEP Keo plans, some kind of pension plan or retirement plan.
I want to remind you, two weeks ago, Congressman George Miller from California, chairs of congressional committee, big Democrat, been there for ages, said we're going to have to do something about the tax deductibility of contributions to people's 401ks because the government is losing money.
We're losing money on this.
So he's going to propose eliminating the deductibility of whatever you contribute to your 401k.
This goes back to 2008 and all hell broke loose.
And all kinds of denials were phoned into this program from Washington in a panic.
And I remember pointing out to you, you can talk about all the so-called greed in the private sector.
All the so-called, they're going to go out and they're going to take the pension of a CEO and your 401k plan and they're going to transfer it to union plans.
And I said, listen to this.
Look at me.
A plan by Teresa Ghilarducci, professor economic policy analysis, new school for social research in New York contains elements that are being considered under Ghilarducci's plan.
This is what the caller talked about.
All workers would receive a $600 annual inflation-adjusted subsidy from the U.S. government, but would be required to invest 5% of their pay into a guaranteed retirement account, a GRA administered by Social Security.
In other words, there is a plan the Democrats are considering to convert your 401k to the Social Security Administration, your 401k, net administered by the SSA.
Your private retirement plan becomes owned by the government.
The money in turn would be invested in special government bonds that would pay 3% a year adjusted for inflation to you.
Ghilarducci is the name the caller was trying to come up with.
This goes back to 2008.
Now, again, this Ghilarducci babe is a professor of economic policy analysis at the New School for Social Research.
She's the one that went bat nuts.
She's the one when they asked her about the, oh, Limbaugh, he's nuts.
He doesn't understand what I'm talking about.
He doesn't have the brain power to understand what I'm talking about.
And yet, here today, earlier this month, it has now become official with a proposal by Tom Harkin, Democrat Iowa, Bernie Sanders, Democrat Vermont, to create the GRA to take your 401k, take it away from you, replace it with $600 a year at 3%, give the money to the unions to make their pensions whole.
That's what they're proposing.
Come hell or high water.
Look for this in a lame duck session.
This is the kind of stuff you ought to be mad about and are.
I remember this like it was yesterday.
This woman appeared before George Miller's committee.
And remember, we had a call from somebody in George Miller's district last week.
We talked about who he is.
But anyway, this woman, Girardelli, or Gilarducci, actually showed up.
And I remember talking about this.
And the reaction that I got was, well, Rush, I mean, you're nuts.
You're crazy to even be concerned about this.
This is just a think piece.
This is just Ms. Gilarducci thinking about things.
This is what we liberals do.
It's just a thought exercise.
She doesn't have any policy power here.
I remember this like it was yesterday.
And here the story is today.
Two years later, almost to the day, two years later, actually 25 months later, her proposal has now been accepted and has been proposed as a piece of legislation by Tom Harkin and Bernie Sanders to create an annuity funded by most of the private money now in private pension plans.
Not much different from Social Security, but it would take your 401k away from you.
And the people pushing it, and by the way, it makes total sense, doesn't it, that Harkin and Sanders are pushing it?
I mean, it's unions.
It's the unions behind it who are panicking over their unfunded, underfunded, unfunded, whatever pension plans to the tune of over $150 billion.
All right, enough of that.
Back to the phones now, McLean, Virginia.
This is Dave.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Megano's Rush from Navy Pilots, Cigar Smoke, and Airline Pilot.
How are you?
Very good, sir.
Thanks very much for calling.
I sort of swerved into a parallel going back to another ESPN member for you with Donovan McNabb in the local area here.
He was removed from the game at two-minute warning and benched.
And the media now is talking about how he's just not living up to being a great quarterback.
And it sort of vindicates you, but also this is just like the media is a parallel with the media with Mr. Obama.
They just long to have a successful black president, but they didn't get the right guy.
Well, you are, in the case of some media people, you're right.
But other media people are launching on Shanahan.
Folks, let me dovetail since Dave brought it up because he's comparing Donovan McNabb and what I said about him in the media, really, and the media and Obama.
Yesterday in the Redskins Lions game in Detroit, in the last two minutes, the coach Mike Shanahan pulled McNab for Rex Grossman.
Rex Grossman, people who follow the NFL were curious about this.
Rex Grossman, I mean, he did play for the Chicago Bears when they lost to the Super Bowl to the Indianapolis Colts, but he was not a journeyman.
He really never amounted to much or hasn't.
He's now second-string quarterback for the Redskins, obviously.
So Shanahan pulls him.
And the excuse given, the reason, well, he's got a better grasp of our two-minute offense than McNabb does because he worked in Houston last year with the offensive coordinator Shanahan's son Kyle, who was the offensive coordinator in Houston.
So to set the table here, Mike Shanahan says, you got to look at what's happened the previous weeks here in the fourth quarter with the Redskins.
You just have to look at this.
It's not me saying it.
It's on tape.
So you get to two minutes.
You pull McNabb and you put in Grossman on the theory he's more familiar with the offensive coordinator's two-minute game plan.
Now, the media is all over the board here today.
Why, they're going, Shanahan going to lose the locker room.
How dare you do this to Donovan McNabb?
And others are wondering, well, why would he do this to McNab?
Why wouldn't?
Shanahan, some are saying this is two coaches now, a lot of credibility here.
Andy Reid in Philadelphia, who traded McNabb, and now Shanahan, who pulled McNab.
And, you know, a lot of people are saying, but Rush, look at what Mike Shanahan said.
He said McNabb hasn't grasped the two-minute offense.
Now, McNabb has been there since spring training.
Now, if it were me, can I say, what does he not grasp?
What is the coach talking about here?
Doesn't grasp the playbook?
Is that what the code doesn't grasp, the two-minute strategy?
The game plan for two minutes?
This has me kind of going in circles here.
I said, why?
This is Mike Shanahan.
This is not some rookie head coach.
But anyway, the media contingent is complaining that Shanahan shouldn't have done.
He's lost the locker room now.
You don't pull a veteran like this.
They just don't do it.
And now we know why they hadn't given McNabb a contract extension for next year and so forth.
The media wondering a lot of questions, but the real one doesn't know the two-minute offense.
I don't know.
That would make me curious.
I'm a sports journalist.
We know Obama is way in over his head.
I mean, Obama's the least qualified guy in any room he walks into.
We've known we've been had with Obama, and he's been there two years, and he's in a two-minute offense, and he is clueless about what to do with it.
Okay, it's the fastest three hours in media, and today it's been intense, and the intensity will not slacken.
We'll keep it up.
We've got an hour left to go.
We'll explain this stuff.
Harvard Tea Party movement alienating young voters, how the Republican Congress will abandon Tea Party ideas, legislate toward the center, next for the GOP, stopping Palin.
▲
Export Selection