All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 25, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:41
October 25, 2010, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
In our opening hour of broadcast excellence, where I, El Rushbo, certainly not playing to a two-thirds empty gym in Michigan, as did Bill Clinton over the weekend. I pointed out the New York Times, Obama's playbook after November 2nd, the New York Times pushing the Republicans to work with Obama to make permanent Obama's destructive policies over the last 20 months and then to start working together on more destructive policies.
The pressure being brought to bear.
Obama's playbook after November 2nd, New York Times.
Here's the USA Today version.
Obama preps for post-election presidency.
Yes, he does.
Preparing for political life.
After a bruising election, President Obama will put greater emphasis on fiscal discipline.
A nod to a nation sick of spending and to a Congress poised to become more Republican, conservative, and determined to stop him.
He's already giving clues about how he will govern in the last two years of his term.
Obama will try to make gains on deficit reduction, education, and energy.
He will enforce his health care and financial overhauls and try to protect them from repeal should Republicans win control of Capitol Hill.
I don't see anything here about Obama moderating.
I don't see anything here about Omaha moving to the right to meet Republicans halfway, as ranking Republicans think that he's going to do.
I don't see any of that here.
He will enforce his health care and financial overhauls, try to protect them.
He will put greater emphasis on fiscal discipline.
You know what this means?
Hello, tax increases.
The Deficit Reduction Panel, don't forget, they're working.
In December, they're going to come forward with their recommendations.
You know what's going to include?
Wall Street Journal story today.
Home mortgage interest deduction is on the table.
In fact, what better time?
What better time than now to remove the home mortgage interest deduction when nobody can afford to buy a house in the first place?
What better time to do it?
No, from their perspective now, if they want to get rid of that, they do.
They have for the longest time.
What better time?
They're going to be less caterwalling than ever.
I mean, if you, I'm sure their grandfather current mortgage interest deduction.
If you have a mortgage, you will continue to be able to deduct your interest on it, but new buyers will not.
And what better time when nobody can buy a house anyway?
Foreclosures are up.
Nobody's working.
No wage increases.
No new jobs on the who's buying houses.
I mean, the housing industry is already in big trouble.
Why not just really lay them into waste when the damage would be big, but not nearly as big as if you did this in a time of prosperity.
And then the VAT taxes come.
That's what it's meant by Obama put greater emphasis on fiscal discipline.
Don't think it's going to mean Obama is going to get responsible about spending.
No, this is now going to focus on paying for all of his spending and paying for even more spending.
Obama pushing for fiscal discipline translates to Obama will try to get the Republicans to raise taxes and impose new ones so that the government can be saved.
It will be positioned as, look, I've inherited this mess, and it was a mess that you Republicans with your president created.
And I'm willing to work with you, but we're going to have to start raising taxes.
We're going to get serious.
The world is going to have to see that we're serious about getting rid of our debt.
Raising taxes will be the simplest way to show the rest of the world we're serious.
This is what fiscal discipline means.
Reports are in the Wall Street Journal, this is the Alan Simpson and Irksom Bowles Commission, that both the home mortgage deduction and dependent child deduction are on the table.
Home mortgage interest and the dependent child deduction are on the table.
We don't need any more children anyway.
We're already bursting at the seams here.
The planet can't support the number of people we have now.
If we need more people, we'll just import them from Mexico.
But we don't need any more American births because we can't support the people that are here now.
Don't doubt me on this.
Folks, this is why this election only begins the real heavy lifting.
Anybody who thinks Barack Obama is going to moderate and become less radical and less intent on moving his agenda forward does not understand the man, does not understand why he's president, why he wanted to be president, who's running him.
Fiscal discipline means getting rid of tax deductions, popular ones, and including the dependent child credit deduction.
Who needs more kids anyway?
Remember now, global warming, environmental destruction, the United States is destroying the planet.
We have too many people who are living too wasteful a lifestyle.
If we need any more people, we'll just get them from Mexico or from around the world.
You know, people born in this country tend to vote the wrong way anyway.
We need people from outside the country.
They'll vote more reliably Democrat than people born here.
Don't doubt me.
Obama preps for post-election presidency.
Let me ask you this.
If you doubt me on this, if you're Obama and the Democrats and the media and you're facing these big losses, are you really that intimidated?
You know, because of history, recent and long-term, that you can force the Republicans into doing anything you want them to do.
Republicans, I mean, you can entice them into a budget battle where you accuse them of starving kids, and they'll actually debate you about it rather than poo-poo the premise.
I mean, really, what are the Democrats?
Why are they, the Tea Party bugs them, but the Republicans don't.
The Tea Party, they fear.
The Tea Party and the new people into politics and the conservative ascendancy, that they fear.
Republican leadership, they don't fear.
They think the Republican leadership, they look at it and, oh, we can turn them all into a bunch of McCains.
All we got to do is call the Washington Post, New York Times, get a couple of favorable profiles on these people.
We own them.
How would you like to be credited with Obama for saving America?
Senator such-and-such.
Look at what's happening in Alaska.
I got an email, a bunch of emails.
Rush, Rush, what's going on in Alaska?
Lisa Murkowski, right?
She looks like she's going to win.
How's this happening?
Very simple.
Who wants her wants Murkowski to win?
Who wants Lisa Murkowski to win?
I'll give you the names, Barack Obama, Harry Reid.
Take a look at who hopes she wins and you'll understand why she better not.
Take a look at who hopes Lisa Murkowski wins and you'll understand why it better be that Joe Miller wins.
Why do we want a Republican running for office that Harry Reid wants, that Obama wants, people like Arlen Specter want?
Why?
How does that move the conservative ascendancy even higher?
It doesn't.
You just need to take a look at who's supporting this.
Look at who's funding her effort.
Is it not union types in Alaska?
Is it you don't see Sarah Palin campaigning for her, do you?
No.
You see any Tea Party people out there for Lisa Murkowski?
No.
But you know Barbara Boxer would love to have her back in the Senate if Boxer makes it back.
You know Dianne Feinstein would love to have Lisa Murkowski back.
You know Susan Collins, Olympia Snow would have loved to have her back.
And Mike Castle in Delaware, oh, well, if I can't win, at least Lisa can and represent our class.
Just take a look at who wants her to win and you'll find out which way to go on this.
Not complicated.
So fiscal discipline, Obama, post-election presidency, playbook after November 2nd.
Here we're setting up a major Republican sweep.
And the focus is, how will Obama continue to get his agenda?
And they're laying out the blueprint.
Well, here's how.
We know there are certain Republicans we can mold and shape, bend, flake, and form to work with us.
And you're going to see more and more of this as this week intensifies.
In West Virginia, this is a story from the Politico.
The Democrat Senate candidate from West Virginia, Governor Joe Manchin, this is the Sheets-Bird seat, says that he didn't understand key details of Obamacare when he publicly endorsed it last March.
And he's now withdrawn that endorsement, West Virginia, because he didn't understand what was in it.
Reaching as far as they did in the weeds of that bill we didn't know about, no one else knew about until it came out, knowing that I wouldn't have supported that or voted for that at that time, Joe Manchin said on Fox News Sunday.
Well, all of us, the members of the great unwashed, we knew the details.
Why didn't he?
We knew what was in it, and he's a Democrat.
Joe Manchin's a Democrat.
I don't believe he didn't know what's in it.
He knew what was in it.
Joe Manchin is all for it.
I love all these Democrats now trying to sound like Ronald Reagan or at least trying to sound conservative because Obama is the kiss of death.
Obama cares the kiss of death.
Here's the Democrat candidate in West Virginia.
I endorse Obamacare.
I'm all for it.
Oh, Treya, take it back.
I didn't know what was in it.
Well, Governor, we did.
Bo Snerdley knew what was in it.
Brian Johnson, EIB broadcast engineer, he knew what was in it.
American after American, millions of Americans knew what was in Obamacare and tried to stop it.
Governor, why didn't you know what was it?
Why is it you had to wait until it was passed to find out what they'd put in the weeds when we knew what was in the weeds before it was passed?
It's a bit of a stretch for us to believe, Governor, that you didn't know what was in the bill.
You are just trying to play both ends against the middle.
Endorse it and now walk back the endorsement.
Whatever is popular at the moment is the position you seek to occupy.
The health care reform is so, so far overreaching in areas I don't agree with that.
1099 part of that, the mandate's also the firewall's not strong enough for abortions.
I'm pro-life, and we're just a different type of Democrats here in West Virginia.
Of course, Mr. Manchin's only a different type of Democrat when he's running for election.
After he wins election, the rest of the time, he's the very model of a liberal Democrat hack.
How did he get to be elected governor if he's just a different kind of Democrat?
We're different kinds of Democrats in West Virginia.
I don't think Bob Bird was not a different kind of Democrat, but he's the kind of Democrat had to run, become a member of the Klan in order to get elected in West Virginia.
That's according to Bill Clinton.
Now, lest we forget, Mr. Obama even deigned to wear a U.S. flagpin when campaigning in West Virginia.
So obviously, Democrats will go to any extreme to bamboozle locals there.
Obama puts on an American flag going into campaign for Manchin?
Yeah, we got to tell these West Virginians we're really Americans.
Can you imagine a conversation?
Robert Gibbs goes to Obama, look, we're going into West Virginia.
You've got to put this on.
What?
Says the president, yep, you got to put this on Manchin.
You know we're trying to pull off this notion.
He disagrees with you on health care.
They're different kind of Democrats in West Virginia.
They, they don't mind the American flag, so you got to put this flag on your lapel.
Obama says, I do yeah yeah, just admitting you can go in there.
Talk about fiscal discipline.
And, by the way, mr president, when you go to West Virginia, don't tell them what your plans are for the coal business.
You don't.
Don't tell them that you can feel free to be in the coal business, but you're going to go bankrupt if you don't.
Don't tell them that, mr president.
Now you you, they're different kind of Democrats in West Virginia.
You, you can't.
You got to wear that flag pin in there.
Meanwhile, you've got a real conservative running against Manchin, John Racy, and a polling data on this race has gone back and forth too, you would believe.
One week Racy's out of it, next week he's way up outside the margin of error.
These polls are used for fundraising and stifle uh enthusiasm on the Republican side.
But get a grip.
I'm looking.
I'm addressing all of you Americans in West Virginia.
Your governor wants you to believe that somebody scammed him on Obamacare and it wasn't until it was actually passed that he found out all that rot gut garbage they put in there.
So now he's walked back his endorsement.
Do you want somebody That easily fooled?
You want a Democrat that other Democrats can so easily roll, like they did, Governor Manchin?
He said it.
I didn't know what was in there until it was passed.
Though most of you in West Virginia did, most of us in the country class that we knew what was in it before it was passed.
And so did Joe Manchin.
So did Obama.
They all told Obama.
Pollo, they all knew what was in it.
That's why they supported it.
Now, let's stay focused on Governor Manchin, West Virginia, running for the Senate.
I didn't know what was in that health care bill.
I didn't know what was in the weeds there until it was passed.
I've withdrawn my endorsement.
Now, he is, and he was at the time of the healthcare debate, the governor of a state.
And ladies and gentlemen, it was state governors who were among the first to publicly oppose Obamacare because of the onerous mandates heaped upon the states.
The states are going to have to shoulder an increasing amount of the financial burden, particularly in Medicare.
And therefore, it was state governors who led the charge and are now leading the effort to get Obamacare repealed.
But somehow, Governor Joe Manchin of West Virginia was blissfully unaware of all of the damage that Obamacare was going to do to the states until he began to run for the Senate.
And then, shazam, he found out what they put in it in the weeds.
But as a governor, he had no idea.
Now, the flagpin comment: what are you talking about, flagpin rush?
Well, March 12th, 2008, Campaign City, Charleston, West Virginia, Barack Obama supported a flag lapel pin and talked up patriotism Monday as he campaigned in blue-collar West Virginia.
Now, if it's news, if it's the lead in a story that the president of the United States put on a flagpin to go into West Virginia, it's obviously unusual if it's the lead.
That's why I was saying, Gibbs goes to Obama, so you better put this flag pin on.
We're going to West Virginia.
I mean, you got to make it look like you care in there.
It also says after he put on the flagpin and talked up patriotism, he shot a solid game of pool.
He went to a pool hole with a flag lapel pin in there, talking patriotism, campaigning for himself for president of the United States of West Virginia.
Now, where have you heard this before?
This is Peter Baker, New York Times over the weekend headline, in losing the midterms, there may be winning.
Tell me where you've heard this.
Let there be no mistake, President Obama wants the Democrats to win next week's elections.
His voice has gone hoarse, telling every audience that from Delaware to Oregon.
But let's also acknowledge this, although he will not say so, there is at least a plausible argument that he might be better off if they lose.
The reality of presidential politics is that it helps to have an enemy.
With Democrats controlling the White House and Congress, they shoulder responsibility for the country's troubles.
No amount of venting about George W. Bush or the filibuster rule has convinced the public otherwise.
But if Republicans capture Congress, Mr. Obama will finally have a foil heading toward his own reelection battle in 2012.
You don't, if you're subscribing to the New York Times, you can cancel it and save the money unless you need it for the bottom of the birdcage.
Because you will hear weeks in advance what the Democrats are thinking on this show.
You won't have to wait till the week before the election to read it in the New York Times.
So, the New York Times is covering both bases.
Both bases.
They're trying to suppress Republican turnout with these stories that McConnell and Boehner are willing to work with Obama and compromise their own beliefs.
They're supposed to get us all into Twitter.
But then, if that doesn't work, if Obama loses, it's even better because now we'll be able to blame along with Obama.
We at the New York Times and Media, we will be able to blame the Republicans for all the trouble Obama's made and help him to victory in 2012.
Because never forget, it's all about Obama.
And I'm still getting grief on this flag pin stuff, the little routine that I'm still getting grief in the email.
Well, I think I'm getting grief because I'm saying that Obama put the pin on, the flag lapel pin on, to only fool people.
And people think that that's insulting, but I'm saying that about the president of the United States.
Well, let me just read you the whole story then, or at least more of it.
This is May 12, 2008, folks, from the Associated Press.
President Obama sported a flag lapel pin and talked up Patriotism Monday as he campaigned in blue-collar West Virginia.
He also shot a solid game of pool.
Now, that's the lead.
When is it a lead story that the president wears an American flag lapel pen?
Come on, you libs.
Somebody tell me.
When's that a story?
It's you know, it was a story when Tom Brokaw put one on.
Tom Brokaw said, I can't show favoritism this way.
This is back during the presidential campaign.
I mean, this shows just how far Democrats are willing to go.
A president would put on a flag lapel pin to get a vote.
A Democrat would do that.
That will show you how far they're willing to go.
That will show you the risk Obama was willing to take.
Stop and think about this.
You got Barack Obama who wants to be President of the United States.
He's campaigning.
He goes into West Virginia.
He takes the inordinate risk of wearing the American flag lapel pin.
I mean, that'll show you just how far they're willing to go, folks.
They will.
Yeah, can you imagine when he got home?
Michelle said, honey, what is that on your jacket?
Oh, that?
American flag lapel pin.
Well, why are you wearing that?
Oh, well, you know, I had to go to West Virginia today.
Oh, yeah, okay, okay, okay, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Barack, you know, that's really gutsy of you.
I'm really proud of you.
Can you imagine that conversation in the White House?
Jonathan Chate, New Republic.
A GOP House will lead to impeachment.
I warned you, people, you're going to get bombarded this week with every conceivable story about how the Republicans are either a bunch of extremists or cowards.
They are either going to impeach Obama or they're going to work with him.
Take your pick.
And a lot of people are asking, and I'm going to get to the phones right after this.
A lot of people want to know.
Even Snerdley came in and asked me today, so what did you think of the NFL this weekend after all the changes in enforcement on the rules on the helmet the helmet hits?
And I said, I think the girls responded very well.
One week after drawing heavy fines for illegal hits, James Harrison and Brandon Merriweather were praised by the NFL for clean play and Sunday's victories.
So the girls stepped up.
Here's Mary in Washington.
Nice to have you on the EIB network and welcome.
Hi, Raj.
It's so nice to talk to you.
I've tried to get in before, and oh, I'm so nervous.
And I got through once, and Snerdley hung up on me, and I cried, and I tried again, and I got back in.
And first of all, I want to let you know that I have thanked God many times for you because I think you're a gift to us for the conservative.
And also how you've brought out all the other voices that are out there.
I don't know.
I honestly believe you're a gift from God.
I don't know what we'd do without you.
Well, you know, there were many, many people who thanked my mother for giving birth to me.
Yeah, well, she was always very proud of that.
Yeah, she should be.
Or she should have been.
I'm sure she was.
She was.
And I also wanted to say that I'm very, very happy that you and Catherine found each other.
So am I.
And I hope you have many people.
A boy chases a girl till she catches him.
That's right.
That's right.
Well, the main reason I called in is that over the years that I've listened to you, there have been times when I have actually doubted you.
Oh, no.
Yeah.
No.
That's awful.
And I've ended up apologizing to you through the radio when you turned out to be right and I turned out to be wrong.
So I just want to tell you today that everything that you're saying, that I want to say dittos, but more than that, I want to say I don't doubt you.
And I believe everything you're saying about the Democrats.
Yeah.
And the media.
Mary, it's also about the media.
And I want you to have nerves of steel this week and next after the election.
It's going to be brutal.
I mean, you think what they're doing to Sarah Pale and Christine O'Donnell now, or they have done up till now, is vicious?
It's going to intensify this week, and it will intensify even more after the elections.
Thank you very much, Mary, for the call.
Terry in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Hi, great to have you here.
Thanks, Rush, conservative dittos.
I have gotten some education from you, I have to say.
One of the points I wanted to validate that you make, and also something I haven't heard too much discussion about that I think we the people need to be aware of.
One, you constantly talk about the Republican Party needs to maintain.
We don't need a third party.
The Republican Party, what we need to do is make it more conservative.
We need to take it back to its conservative roots.
And I would lobby that we would push it back towards the Constitution because it has gotten away from it.
So I confirm and validate that and love that you preach that.
The point that I don't hear a lot of discussion about is I think that very strategy is what has happened with the Democratic Party.
I think that we have an ideology of fascist and Marxist individuals that have taken the Democratic Party and hijacked it rather than creating a third party to distract from it.
And they have taken the Democratic Party and pushed it further from the Constitution.
So I would love to hear more discussion about that on the airwaves.
I would love for we the people to recognize that that's what has been happening.
These people really are sheets in wool clothing as we go to the polls next week.
There is something definitely to it that something happened to the Democrat Party.
I mean, this is not the Democrat Party, a Hubert Humphrey, or JFK.
But the last 20 years, the Democrat Party didn't need to be hijacked.
I don't think the Democrat Party was hijacked so much as it was eventually just consumed.
I mean, where else are leftists, communists, Marxists at all going to go?
There already is the Communist Party USA.
Remember, leftists and Marxists know that they're a minority.
And if they come out and say, hey, here's what we are, this is what we're going to do, they get creamed.
I think the Democrat Party has always been what it is.
It's just they have, in the last bunch of years, learned to go ahead and during election years, moderate, sound Republican, do whatever, sound conservative, but govern in just exactly, in other words, lie about what they believe, lie about who they are, lie about this.
And in that way, they get mainstream Democrats who may not be extreme leftists to go along with the party.
But clearly, if John Fitzgerald Kennedy was alive today, and all things being equal, he would not recognize the Democrat Party.
He would not.
He would be shouted down.
This guy was.
JFK believed in American exceptionalism.
He believed in self-reliance.
He believed in defending the country.
He didn't think the United States was guilty.
He believed in a strong defense and lower taxes.
He was not a Reaganite on taxes, but he believed in lowering tax rates for a time as an economic stimulus.
LBJ was not a JFK.
LBJ was further left.
And I actually think that one of the things that led to the Democrat Party making the obvious sharp turn to the left was the fact that a Marxist killed JFK.
I mean, Lee Harvey Oswald was a Marxist and a communist.
And I discombobulated him and threw him for a loop.
JFK was a capitalist.
He had nothing in common with his brother Teddy.
Well, I mean, sure, there were some things in common, but I'm talking about politically.
There really weren't all that much.
I mean, Ted Kennedy became a huge...
I'm not saying Kennedy wasn't a Democrat.
JFK was a Democrat, and he was not a conservative, ideologically.
But he was not a Barney Frank.
He was not a Harry Reid or a John Kerry or a Barack Obama.
He was an anti-communist.
You don't find those guys in the Democrat Party today.
All right, a brief timeout.
I've got a lot of audio soundbites I want to get.
In fact, let's get to one now.
This is a report from Michigan, WXYZ TV, Eyeball News at 6, the anchor introducing and a portion of correspondent Val Clark's report about Clinton at a rally in Detroit for the Democrat gubernatorial candidate.
This is at the gymnasium that was two-thirds empty.
There was low turnout at a get-out-the-vote rally in Detroit despite the former president's appearance.
Action news reporter Val Clark has more from Verge Bonero's camp.
Verge Bonero is the one running for governor, but Bill Clinton was the star of the show.
He came to Renaissance High School to motivate Democrats to turn out in big numbers Election Day.
Don't let this man lose because you lose if he loses.
This is just one of several campaign stops Bill Clinton will be making here in Michigan today to help get Democrats elected.
He was very energetic.
And I would say that we are just going to have to mobilize.
I'm going to get out on the internet, which I love.
Send emails.
Make a few phone calls and put some Bernaro signs on my dogs.
Now, what a laugher this is.
The report starts out.
The anchor says, low turnout at a get out the vote rally in Detroit despite the former president's appearance.
And then the info babe, Val Clark says, Bill Clinton was the star of this show.
He came to Renaissance High School to motivate Democrats to turn out in big numbers on Election Day.
They didn't even turn out in big numbers for him.
Is this all you have to do to be a star in the Democrat Party is attract one-third of the capacity of a high school gym to a get-out-the-vote rally?
And the media there will call you a star?
Still getting grief on the flagpole.
Now, the flag pins are still getting grief on this.
All right.
You libs, you continue to step in it.
Two stories here.
October 4th, 2007.
This is six months before the May 2008 story where Obama goes into West Virginia.
And the lead item in the story is he's wearing an American flag lapel pin.
And don't think that you are distracting me from other things by getting me to focus on this because you are not.
I am simply nailing this.
ABC News, David Wright, and Sundland Miller, October 4th, 2007.
Obama dropped flagpin in war statement.
Obama stops wearing flagpins, says he'll show patriotism through ideas.
October 4th, 2007, an eagle-eyed reporter for the ABC affiliate in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, noticed something missing from Democrat presidential contender Barack Obama's lapels.
You don't have the American flag pin on.
Is that a fashion statement? The reporter asked.
I mean, those have been on politicians since September 12th of 2011, 2001.
Standard political reply to that question might well have been, well, my patriotism speaks for itself, but Obama didn't say that.
He said, I'm going to show my patriotism through ideas, not symbolism.
So in October 2007, he had taken the lapel pin off, and that was a news story.
The lead item.
It's the headline, Obama dropped flagpin in War State.
Then you go to May 2008, the lead item, it's back.
Obama's wearing the flag pin and shooting a game of pool in West Virginia.
This will show you how far Democrats are willing to go.
And then the date here is February 24th, 2008.
So you have October 2007 takes the flag pin off.
February 2008, AP, no flag pin, no hand over his heart.
Is he exposed?
President Barack Obama's refusal to wear an American flag lapel pin, along with a photo of him not putting his hand over his heart during a national anthem, led conservatives on the internet and the media to question his patriotism.
And in fact, the AP's headline was, Obama may face grilling unpatriotism because there was no flagpin.
Took it off.
October 2007.
May 2008, it's back.
February 2008, it's noticed that it's not there, and he's getting grilled on it.
So don't get on me because I happen to remember my history.
Don't get on me because I remember that whether or not he was wearing a flag pin was the lead item in news stories.
So when he decided to go into West Virginia to campaign, it was time to put it back on.
He wasn't going to let his patriotism speak for itself in West Virginia.
He's going to put the symbol of it on a lapel.
Just that simple.
Here's Joan in Redding, Vermont.
Great to have you on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hello, Rush.
Nice to talk with you.
I'm calling, and I congratulate you on your marriage, and may you have many, many years.
We just celebrated our 50th wedding anniversary.
That's wonderful.
It's just amazing.
Unbelievable and wonderful.
Well, thank you.
I wanted to make a comment this morning on a number of the stations I heard where 30%, I hope I heard this correctly.
Well, I don't know if I hope, but I thought I heard 30% of the country from polls are undecided as to how they're going to vote.
You know, I really was shocked to hear that.
And I find it interesting, although I shouldn't, in that for California, for Barbara Boxer, although I shouldn't be surprised with the agenda in California and with the way the left-sided,
the left-wing supposedly had said, no, when she was talking with the general that time and her pompous attitude as to he addressed her as ma'am and how she said, you know, I wish you would address me as senator.
I worked so hard.
It's hard to earn this, yeah.
I thought that was extremely rude of her.
And very childish and immature.
30% say they're not sure how they're going to vote.
I think that's, you missed reading that.
That's a poll of Democrats.
30% are not sure they're going to vote.
It looks like the Associated Press has stumbled onto another breaking story, one that we've been telling you about for two years now.
The headline says it all.
Could overhaul, undermine employer health coverage.
AP's worried now that Obamacare might lead to employers abandoning their health care coverage, which is the objective of Obamacare.
▲
Export Selection