All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 20, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:42
October 20, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Actually, ladies and gentlemen, the Jon Stewart and the Colbert rallies on October 30th, I have been thinking about this.
I actually believe that every network ought to televise these rallies on every channel.
I can't think of anything better to get out tea party votes.
But I mean, the everyday ordinary American voter than by being mocked by a bunch of stupid and smug about it, overpaid metrosexual comedians and whoever their guests are.
I mean, I think that'd be a great thing to get voter turnout, these rallies.
They don't have enough port-a-potties.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, behind the golden EIB microphone, serving humanity, executing assigned host duties flawlessly.
Zero mistakes.
800-282-2882 if you want to be on the program.
We had a call a moment ago from a woman who said that the professor is demanding that students grab three people and go early vote for course credit.
I said, well, I've heard about this variation of this in Ohio.
And here it is from Cincinnati.com.
Three van loads of Hughes has scruple students were taken last week during scruple hours to vote.
They were given sample ballots only for Democrat candidates, and then they were taken for ice cream.
All this alleged in a lawsuit on Monday.
The complaint was made by Thomas Brinkman Jr., Republican candidate for Hamilton County Auditor, and the coalition opposed to additional spending and taxes against Cincinnati public schools.
They plan to bring four more high schools to vote this week, said Christopher Finney, an attorney for Coast.
It seeks that this lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order to prevent school officials from participating or helping students participate in partisan politics during scruple hours or with scruel property or employees involved.
Now, if they've got time for this in Cincinnati, you know they've got time for this elsewhere.
If this is going on in Ohio, you can almost be assured it's going on elsewhere.
The lawsuit alleges three van loads of Hughes has-scruel students arrived at the downtown Board of Elections offices at 1 o'clock Wednesday, supervised by a scruel employee.
School gets out at 3.15.
When they got out of the vans, the students, according to the suit, were accompanied by adults who appear to be campaign workers or supporters for U.S. Representative Steve Driehaus or Dryhouse, not sure he pronounces it, Democrat West Price Hill, who is the congressman being challenged this poll by Steve Chabot.
So they're taking, I guess it has to be high school seniors.
One would hope it's high school seniors out of school to vote, giving Democrat ballots and then ice cream.
You know, they've started a school dinner program, a school dinner program.
We've had mention of this on previous broadcasts.
From Washington, potato growers say the potato is being unfairly singled out by healthy food advocates.
After a recommendation by the Institute of Medicine, the Federal Women, Infants, and Children Program, WIC, okayed an interim rule that bars participants from buying potatoes with their federal dollars.
Potatoes are the only vegetables not allowed to be purchased in the WIC program.
The Institute is the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences.
Also has recommended that the U.S. Department of Agriculture-backed school lunch program limit the use of potatoes.
And you're saying, why?
Potatoes?
Because they're fattening.
Because they're fattening.
It's the same reason they're picking on sugared soft drinks and candy.
They're said to be fattening.
And potatoes lead to French fries.
So first they came for your trans fat.
Nobody said anything.
Then they came after your salt and nobody said anything.
Then they came after your Coke and Pepsi in 7-Up and nobody said anything.
And now they're coming after your potatoes.
Bread will be next, Snerdley.
Bread will be next.
Guaranteed.
Yesterday on this program, I mentioned that something curious had happened in the NFL Monday night game against the Tennessee Titans and Jacksonville Jaguars.
The original report was, it looks like now, maybe a very clever, quasi-practical joke played out by the Houston, or I'm sorry, Tennessee coach Jeff Fisher.
Apparently, apparently the NFL, according to Fisher, said, you know, ESPN's got a couple of timeouts they haven't used and a couple commercials.
You need to call a couple timeouts here in the last two minutes so that ESPN get its commercials in.
This is what Fisher said at the post-game press conference because he was asked, why are you still running plays out there?
Fisher said, well, I wanted to take a knee, but Jack used his timeout to coach of the Jaguars, Jack Del Rio.
Jack used his timeout, so I wanted to take a knee.
I wanted the game to end, but he's going to take timeouts.
Okay, I'll run plays.
So I'll give the ball to Chris Johnson.
I'll run up some yards.
So they said, wait a minute.
You mean the NFL went to both you coaches or ESPN and asked you to call timeouts in the last two minutes when you otherwise wouldn't have just saw they get commercials in.
And Fisher said, well, no, that's not exactly that way.
The next day, Fisher explained it.
At the two-minute warning in every game in the fourth quarter, there are conversations that go by.
These conversations that take place at the two-minute warning before the first half, also.
But the conversations that take place, the two-minute warning, the fourth quarter, it's the official's responsibility to give the head coach a status of commercials and TV timeouts so that the coach will know how many TV timeouts there are remaining because calling his own timeouts in the last two minutes to try to eke out a victory sometimes are crucial.
Then Fisher said, yesterday, meaning Monday night, I was told they were too short.
ESPN was two timeouts, commercial timeouts short.
And they looked at me and smiled and I said, sorry, I can't help you.
The game official, a referee Mike Kerry, came across and said to me to Fisher, here's the deal.
We're two spot breaks short.
And I said, Mike, I can't help you.
I'm trying to get a first down.
And if I get a first down, I'm going to take a kneel and I'm going to run the clock out.
So apparently, Carey then went over to Del Rio, said, Jack, we're a couple short here.
And apparently, Del Rio's, okay, and called a couple timeouts to help the league, to help ESPN.
And Fisher says, okay, fine.
If he's going to call timeouts, Jack used his timeouts.
So I'll run Chris Johnson.
I'll try to get some more.
Well, he didn't say this, folks, but there's fantasy football in this, too.
I guarantee you, there's fantasy football considerations in here.
You know, getting the running back some yards.
Nobody's going to ever admit this.
Don't ever quote me on it.
I'm just telling you, fantasy football is in this mix as much as it is ESPN getting their full commercial breaks.
After the game, Jeff Fisher seemed to be in on a private joke when he talked about the timeouts.
At the Pro Football Talk website, they write, we suspect that Fisher may have been having a wee bit of fun at Jack Del Rio's expense.
We've heard from people who think the Titans were rubbing it in by reinserting Chris Johnson into the game, but Fisher insisted he just wanted the game to end.
And Del Rio didn't let the game end because he called it timeouts.
And so since the opposing coach called a timeouts, I assume Fisher said, I'm going to go ahead and try to score then.
I mean, it was a blowout.
It's 28 or 33 to 3.
The Jaguars had no prayer here.
This is crucial.
There's no reason to call timeouts.
Unless there's another possibility.
They were using a brand new second string quarterback, Trent Edwards, they recently got from the Buffalo Bulls and get him some reps.
Call timeout, get your new quarterback some reps in the system.
Let him call some plays.
This could have been at work here, too.
But most coaches, nobody's going to risk injury.
The game's over, 33 to 3 in the last two minutes.
There's nothing that can happen here.
The only thing go wrong is something bad.
You don't want an injury into this.
But the league comes to you.
The Riff comes, hey, we're a couple timeouts short.
Del Rio says, okay, after Fisher said, screw you, I'm taking a knee.
Well, he didn't say screw you.
I don't want to misquote.
He said, sorry, Mike, I can't help you.
I want to get a first down and take a knee, meaning run the clock out.
Del Rio, okay, you need a couple timeouts.
I'll call him.
Which allowed Fisher to put his running back back in the game and rack up some more yards.
Here's Fisher.
Jack used his timeouts.
Whether Jack used his timeouts because the officials said we're too commercial short, or he used them to stop the clock to get his quarterback some reps.
That remains to be seen.
My feeling is I had no issue with him using the timeouts.
I completely understand.
You got a backup quarterback in.
It's been there for, what, two weeks?
He wants to get him some reps.
So I completely understand it, even though the game is out of reach.
So, yeah, Jack used his timeouts.
Fine.
I'm totally innocent here.
Why are you running up the score?
Why are you putting Chris Johnson back in?
Well, I was trying to run the game clock out, but the other guy called the timeouts.
So the original story was ESPN, ESPN asserting control over the game, which is not supposed to happen, even though they're the big rights holder.
Even though they pay $1 billion a year, they are not supposed to get in the way of the integrity of the game.
There are television timeouts, and the coaches know when those timeouts are going to happen.
And if you've studied the game, you know when they're going to happen.
But if there are a couple short because of the way the game's worked out, sometimes the league gets a two-minute warning.
Say, we're a couple short.
Sometimes the coach says, I can't help you.
Sometimes, I guess the coach says, I will.
But the original story was that here's ESPN, big, bad ESPN, couple commercial breaks short, trying to control a game to get their money back.
When that hit, you know, ESPN kind of blew their gaskets, said, most times you'd be right, but in this case, you're wrong.
So Fisher had to moderate the story a little bit.
That's why people are thinking Fisher might have been playing a little practical joke on Jack Del Rio.
We'll never really know, but still fascinating stuff.
And here is Fisher.
This is post-game press conference.
And a reporter said the decision not to take a knee after the two-minute mark in the fourth quarter.
What's that all about, coach?
Jack uses timeouts.
My understanding is what we needed some network timeouts.
So I think that's why Jack uses timeouts.
And so we because they came over and asked me to do it.
And I said, well, I was hoping to get a first down and kneel on it.
They asked me to take some timeout.
I said, no, no, first down and then take a knee.
They went to Del Rio.
Okay.
In the meantime, Chris Johnson in fantasy football land got some more yards and made some more money for owners that have him.
And ESPN got their spots.
Therefore, what?
I just find it fascinating.
But I promised yesterday I was going to talk about it, so I figured I better talk about it to fulfill the promise.
Yes, the official program observer has a question.
What?
No, I don't think the NFL commissioner would be.
I don't think this would approach the commissioner level.
I think this is no, this is the department, the broadcast division, would deal with this.
The commissioner, what they're focusing on now is all these headshots.
And folks there is, I know you don't care about this, but I do.
There is a huge overreaction going on now.
This is so, so predictable.
You had an anomaly.
You had a, on one Sunday, you had some incredibly vicious, mostly legal, according to the rules, headshots.
One of them, maybe two, one, certainly questionable, second one, possibly questionable, most of them legal.
Good and tough, but.
But the day before, a Rutgers player was paralyzed from the neck down on the same field that the big hit took place on Sunday in the Giants Lions game.
And the media, being who they are, got all holier than now on this.
And so the league gets involved in there and says, okay, we're going to start enforcing the law of suspensions.
We've got a rule here that suspends people for head-to-head shots in certain circumstances.
So they've gone, predictably, they've had an overreaction.
And people say, well, it's better to overreact in this case than underreact.
One of the guy that got fined the most, James Harrison of the Steelers, has number 92.
He had a meeting with Mike Tomlin today.
They said, I'm not coming into practice.
Oh, I'm thinking of quitting.
If you're going to legislate the way I play the game out of the game, I'm not thinking of quitting.
So his agent is saying, he's serious.
He's serious about retiring.
Everybody says, come on, agent.
He's not going to retire.
He'd have to give back $6 million of his $10 million prorated bonus.
He's not going to retire.
This is all a marketing ploy.
It's all PR buzz and so forth.
But Harrison met with the coach, Mike Tomlin, and is not at practice today.
It is not known whether he'll be there tomorrow.
And he got fined $75,000.
He had two hits, one on Joshua Cribs and one on Muhammad, I forget the last name.
And they were both headshots.
One of them was legal, one of them questionable.
Harrison thought they were both legal.
So that's the way I've been taught to play the game.
If I can't play the game this way, I'm going home.
Now, James Harrison also, he's a character.
Steelers won the Super Bowl.
One player, he refused to go to the White House to meet Obama on a theory that they wouldn't have invited us if we hadn't won the Super Bowl, so they really don't mean it.
But he ended up going.
But he said, I don't believe you.
They don't care about us.
They don't really mean it.
We're only being invited.
Yeah, Mohamed Masaquoy for the Cleveland Browns was the other player.
Anyway, that's latest NFL news.
James Harrison said to be a repeat offender and all this.
A quick timeout.
We'll come back and continue.
Your phone calls coming up here on the EI.
I don't know.
I don't know how these guys vote.
I don't know that they do vote.
It doesn't matter.
Look, if the NFL is serious about this helmet-to-helmet stuff, the one thing that can be safely said: these players launching themselves as missiles into other players is not really taught.
That's just instinct.
It's just developed.
If they really want to get serious, just teach tackling.
You got to arm tackle somebody.
No more hits.
No more blowing somebody up.
You got to tackle them.
You've got to tackle them between the numbers and the waist or above the knees or whatever.
You're going to really tackle.
Bring back.
Or Ditka says, get rid of the face mask.
There's a bunch of things you could do here.
But the 30-year secret is, I know I overused that, the league doesn't want to.
Well, I'll stop there.
Let's go back to potatoes.
It's safer.
From the UK Daily Mail, a mother feeding the ducks with her two children was stunned when she was told by a council warden she would be told off for giving the birds unhealthy white bread.
I'm not making it up.
Lisa Taplin, 34, was told by the park ranger to bring granary or whole meal bread the next time as it was better for the ducks than white bread.
The official said that giving ducks white bread was tantamount to feeding her son potato chips with every meal.
Now, Ms. Taplin described the episode as a crazy thing, said she walked away feeling both angry and guilty because she left the ducks malnourished.
Now, first, no more potatoes in the American public school system.
Essentially, we're discriminating here against the Irish.
No more potatoes.
And everybody knows it's not the potato that's bad, it's what you put on it.
Potatoes, 130 calories.
Yeah, but Mithril Limbo, Mithril Limbo with a lot of starch.
Well, you need starch.
That's not Mithril Limbo potatoes.
Kill everybody.
People who've eaten potatoes have all died.
Everybody knows this.
Right.
Okay.
So, discriminant against the Irish, no potatoes in the school lunch program, and now no white bread is permitted to be fed to ducks in public parks in the UK.
I mentioned to you a couple of weeks ago that Obama's getting out of town, getting out of country two days after the election.
He's going to India, among other places.
One of the places he's going to go to India is one of the country's most sacred shrines.
But he was going to go there.
He's not going to go there now because it required to wear headgear in there.
And the religion celebrated at this shrine is not Islam, but it's closed.
And you got to wear a turban in there.
And Obama is not going.
The White House advanced teams.
He's not going to go in there.
He's got to wear headgear because it's obvious.
He don't want pictures taken where it looks like a Muslim.
Okay, why not wear a yarmulke?
Just put on a yarmulke and go in there.
Your head's covered up, and nobody's going to think he's a Jew.
I mean, why that'd be the way that you could go there, put a yarmulk on.
Nobody's going to think he's Israeli or Jewish.
He's very sensitive about this stuff here.
When a photo of then Senator Obama dressed in a traditional white Kenyan turban was leaked by Hillary Clinton's campaign during the 08 presidential election, Obamacare images smear.
Yeah, Hillary smeared Obama.
We've all seen that picture.
He's wearing a turban.
To come to a Golden Temple, he needs to cover his head, said Dalmeg Singh, secretary of the committee that runs the temple.
That's our tradition.
It's their problem to cover the head with a Christian hat or a Muslim cap.
Oh, you can't wear a yarmulke in there.
Okay.
So you've got to wear a Christian hat or Muslim cap.
He doesn't want to do that.
We have problems.
This is the White House advanced team.
I know there's no Christian hat.
What is a Christian hat?
Anyway, we have no problems if he wears a skull cap, the kind that Muslims wear to the mosque or any other cap that's modified to something similar.
We don't allow baseball caps or army hats in there, said Gianni Gurbaken Singh, head priest of the temple.
It's a Sikh temple.
It's right, it's a Sikh temple.
And they're not going in there because, well, he doesn't want to wear anything on his head.
That's what he's not going to go in there.
It just, I guess, is deemed to be more trouble than it's worth.
This is this next story.
Washington Post, the oil has mostly disappeared.
And in southern Louisiana, things are finally looking normal.
Improbably, blessedly normal.
Six months after the oil spill.
We told you, by the way, this would be the case.
But on a truly normal evening, A.C. Cooper Jr. would be out shrimping.
Instead, one recent night, he was staying home, as he's done more often these days.
They say, A.C., why are you staying home?
Well, he said, don't pay me to do that when they're going to pay my claim anyway.
So A.C. Cooper says, why should I go work when BP is paying me the same amount to not work in the form of damages?
That's right.
BP's money is altering the Gulf Coast, not the oil.
BP's money.
The company has been trying on federal orders to protect not just the water, but the way of life there, but BP's waterfall of cash has changed people's lives profoundly.
Created a bunch of welfare cases, basically.
Difficult redistribution of wealth.
Welfare cases.
Why work?
BP's paying me to sit home.
A.C. Cooper, ACY, by the way, not AC, but AC Cooper is learning the Nancy Pelosi way of economics.
It's very easy to unlearn the work ethic, folks.
It doesn't take much at all to learn how you don't have to work.
Here's Carol in Birmingham, Alabama, as we go back to the phones.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
It's nice to speak with you.
Thank you.
I have a warning for the Republican establishment in Washington.
What would the warning be?
Well, we tea partiers out here in flyover country are not only intelligent, we're also dedicated.
So if they don't get the mandate come November 2nd and start rolling this government back off of our backs, then they will no longer have a job.
Let me ask you a question about this.
Now, what do you reasonably expect them to be able to do?
You've got a list of demands, and you've just said if they don't do it, then they're going to be toast.
What are they going to have to do?
Well, they're going to have to repeal Obamacare, and even if it's going to be vetoed, they still need to vote on it.
Okay, let me stop you.
Let me stop you.
So you don't want them to rely on the excuse that they don't have the votes to override it.
You want them to pass the override legislation and vote on it and send it up to him and make him veto it.
Yes.
Okay.
And you probably subscribe to the theory, wait a minute, who says we won't be able to overthrow it?
Who says we won't get some Democrats go along with it?
Exactly.
Because the polls are increasingly, nobody wants this.
Who says we can't override it?
That's what you're thinking, too, right?
Yes, exactly.
Well, that's pretty pointed.
I mean, and it's pretty clear, too.
So you're requiring an effort.
You want to see action behind all of these words that you've been hearing during the campaign.
Yes.
They have told you that they've heard you, and you want to see proof.
I want to see proof.
You don't want to hear them say, wait a minute, you have to understand we're not really going to control the government.
We're not going to have that many votes.
You don't want to hear that.
No.
No.
You have to go and try.
If you don't try, then you're just like the Democrats.
What do you think of the House leadership's promise to have open debate on the floor of the House and the promise to be civil?
I think it's the same old thing.
We're all up here.
We're all buddies.
And we're going to take care of each other.
And that's not what the American people want.
Right.
So when you hear the House leadership say, the Democrats have not let us into committee hearings.
The Democrats have not let us debate into this.
Well, we're going to let them debate.
We're going to open our doors.
We're going to let them in.
We're going to have an open process.
We're going to be very civil.
You say, we don't care about that.
No.
We don't even want a debate.
We just want you to skunk them.
Yes.
Right.
Okay.
I mean, I don't mean to be asking leading questions, but that's right, Correct.
That's exactly what I think.
Enough.
We've had enough of Washington as it is.
And you've had enough of the words.
You want action.
I want action.
Even if they can't make it happen, they better show us they're trying to.
Right, because you want them to make Obama go on the record defending and upholding this health care bill.
You want the Obama and the Democrats to be shown to be supporting it and upholding it.
Yes.
You don't want them to be given a pass.
You don't want to hide behind this business.
Well, we can't override it.
Who's to say we can't?
You want it plastered all over that they love the health care bill, that they support it, and that you don't.
Yes, because I think it would only lead to even a bigger turnover in the next election.
Exactly right, because the ultimate objective is to get rid of him.
Exactly.
And then we get somebody of ours in the White House, and then we really repeal it.
Exactly.
Well, no better, clearer words have been spoken by a caller in I don't know how long.
Thank you, Rush.
Thank you, Carol.
She's really smart.
We'll be back after this.
So you want to talk a little foreign money in American politics?
George Soros has admitted to donating $1 million to Media Matters for America, which is a ⁇ they call it a media, left-wing media watchdog.
So it's not that.
It's a bunch of propagandists.
And Soros, a foreigner, has admitted it.
Donates a million dollars to Media Matters.
Now, it's stuff like that, stuff like that that is going to generate even more turnout on Election Day.
We need a surge.
We need a surge even above and beyond what we already think is going to happen.
We need to make November 2nd Obama's Katrina.
November 2nd needs to be a TNAMI.
And with stuff like this Soros business and everything that's going to happen, all these dirty tricks are going to happen between now and Election Day.
It's not going to suppress turnout.
It is going to ratchet it up.
Obama's Katrina.
A tinami.
On November the 2th.
Lincoln, Delaware, this is Pat.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
What an honor to speak to you.
I've been listening to you since 1992, so this is a true honor.
Thank you very much.
I'm interesting to speak to you.
Hey, I'm calling about the politics in Delaware.
This is a tough place for conservatives.
And even the Republican Party is full of rhinos.
And of course, our lovely castle is a good example of what we've been up against.
The conservatives, the candidates in Delaware have been ignored, and actually, better yet, they've been denigrated.
I can't tell you early on in the election cycle how I heard over and over again the mantra, conservatives are not electable.
I heard electability, electability, electability.
Yeah, but who did you hear that from?
The Republican people.
The Republican leaders in the party.
That's what I mean.
Yeah.
And the interesting part was the conservatives in Delaware rose up, and we elected two conservative candidates, one for the Senate and one for the Congress.
We cannot afford these seats to go like Castle C.
We have a congressional guy running for his seat for Castle C.
We can't afford to let that go to the Democrats.
And in fact, this is the first time in, I can't tell you how many years in Delaware, that the conservative candidates actually have a shot at getting elected, at winning the election.
To what do you attribute that?
I think there's been just a groundswell of conservatives who, and people who didn't even know they were conservatives, but now they're seeing the Tea Party, the 912ers, and I think there's just such an awareness.
Wait a minute, though.
Wait a minute.
They're also seeing Obama, right?
Absolutely.
That was my next...
The next thing I was going to say was they're seeing Obama.
And I think people like myself, my family, they're seeing our freedoms at stake here.
I mean, we're in deep trouble with this man.
And it's interesting because some people believe that in Delaware that if, say, the Senate race starts to go our way, it will actually pull the congressional race along with them.
And there is a shot.
It might be a bit of a shot at this point, but that if one starts to gain momentum, the other one will actually come across.
Well, you have to think.
You have to think that the regime is concerned about O'Donnell.
No reason to send Obama and Joe Bite me in there if it's a safe seat for the Democrat.
I mean, why waste their time?
I mean, their stated reason was, oh, it's a golden opportunity.
We're going to sit Obama and bite me in there because Christine O'Donnell's so stupid that it'll allow us to show the rest of the country how stupid all conservative Republicans are.
If that was the purpose, they didn't succeed in it.
They went in and their campaign appearances were all about.
Don't take anything for granted here.
So they obviously don't think that Koons has this in the bag.
Otherwise, no reason to go.
Now, if the experts are saying, and there are a lot of them, by the way, from Dick Morris to Charlie Cook to Ras Mewson, and there's a bunch of them.
If they are saying that there are at least 100 seats in play, then pretty much you have to conclude that there aren't any safe seats if 100 seats are in play.
I mean, there are some safe seats, but 100 seats, this is huge.
If 70 to 100 seats change hands, that is a T NAMI.
That is Obama's Katrina.
And what the Tea Party is doing is making every election about ideology, which is what has to happen.
The sooner that happens, the sooner elections are about ideology, the sooner we're finished with these people as having anything like a chance to become a ruling majority or minority.
If the education is conservatism versus Democrat, liberal, socialist, Marxist, they'll never win outside of a couple enclaves here in the country.
Bob, in Framingham, Massachusetts, nice to have you.
I'm glad you waited.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
You know, I wish I was on the Christine O'Donnell's campaign team because I think she's missing the boat.
All she has to do is nationalize the election and skip the rest.
All she has to do is just run short ads saying Coons equals Obamacare, O'Donnell equals no Obamacare.
Coons equals cap and trade, cap and tax.
O'Donnell equals no cap and trade, cap and tax.
Case closed.
You may be right.
I believe in the nationalization of elections.
There's some people in her team, though, that think, look, this is Delaware.
We're talking, what, 70,000 voters?
I don't know what the population is, and most of them are liberal, Democrat, so their philosophy is...
But most people are against Obamacare, and they're against cap and trade.
But she needs to clarify that Koons is a vote for Obamacare and Coons is a voter.
She should just stress that in the rads and that's it.
Well, but see, you're assuming that most people in Delaware oppose Obama.
We don't know this.
But that's what she's got to ride on.
Because, well, look at it this way.
Republicans are opposed to Obama.
The Republicans, the ones that are holding back are getting fed this mantra that, you know, she's not smart, et cetera, et cetera.
All she has to do is say, what counts is how I'm going to vote in the Senate.
And that's all that should count.
And she's going to vote for the strong economy.
That's all she has to say.
I'll grant you she should concentrate on it.
I grant you.
Brevity is the solo wit.
There's no question.
I mean, the simpler and more direct she can make the message, the better off.
No doubt about it.
The rioting continues in France, ladies and gentlemen, all because of one thing.
All because the retirement age has been raised to 62 from 60.
Retirement age raised two years is causing all the havoc.
And they are afraid of the eroding social benefits in France in favor of American-style capitalism.
And this is causing riots.
Now, what will cause riots in this country?
We will answer that tomorrow.
Hint.
▲
Export Selection