All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 18, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:44
October 18, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Now, this is the strangest thing.
I just saw, I just read the Junior Sayao into his first year of retirement from the National Football League, was arrested on domestic violence charges and then proceeded to drive his Cadillac escalate over a cliff.
He's in the hospital with minor bumps and bruises and some scratches, and I saw a picture of them hauling the escalade, the Cadillac Escalade up from the cliff bottom.
Now it just drove off a cliff.
It doesn't say on purpose or accidentally.
He says drove off a cliff.
After being arrested on domestic violence charge, Junior Seyo last played for the New England Patriots.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.
Great to have you here.
Folks, let me try to inspire some confidence in you.
I know a lot of people, and I I must take some blame for this.
I know that part of this is my fault.
A couple of weeks ago when I spelled out what I think Obama's approach is going to be.
Blame the Republicans.
Run against the Republicans.
Much easier for Obama to win re-election by running against the opposing party.
Blame the Republicans for everything.
Here we are in the middle of an economic mess.
Obama will position himself as having all the answers, all the miraculous fixes, and the evil Republicans are going to be opposing him at every step of the way, and he'll take that and say, see, I got all these wonderful ideas, but they won't help me.
They won't join me.
Now a lot of you sent me emails and said, Well, Rush, why should we even show up and vote then?
You thought I was being fatalistic.
I was not.
I was trying to prepare you for what's coming.
That's all.
Trying to prepare everybody for what's coming.
The Republicans are going to get blamed.
We all know this.
I mean, even now, Obama's blaming the evil empire.
The evil empire is back.
The evil empire, us.
We're striking back.
You know, Reagan can make a joke about the evil empire and everybody goes nuts.
Obama can do it and the press applauds.
But let me try to infuse some optimism.
How long's Obama been blaming Bush for the economic mess that we're in?
Three years, has he not?
At least two during the campaign year of 2008, all during 2009, and most of this year, all of this year.
Obama's been blaming Bush.
Well, now, if people believed that, wouldn't the Democrats be looking at smooth re-election?
If Obama were universally popular and loved, as he was during the 08 campaign, and if he were successful blaming Bush, then why would the Republicans be winning anything?
See, my point is, uh, ladies and gentlemen, Obama hasn't succeeded in blaming the Republicans.
He's done it.
I mean, he's blamed the Republicans, blamed everything on what he inherited.
He blamed it on his predecessor.
And I know what you're saying.
Yeah, but Rush, but Rush, everybody knows Bush isn't around anymore.
The Republicans are going to be in office, and they are going to be the majority in the House.
Okay, fine.
I'll give you that.
But if he hasn't been able to blame all of this on Bush now.
Now remember, he did succeed in that as part of his ability to get elected.
Hell, a lot of Republicans agreed with him.
But he's been on this case ever since he was immaculated.
And it's clear the American people do not blame Bush for this.
If they did, Obama's popularity way up.
People would still love and adore him for making all these brave and courageous decisions to fix what Bush had broken.
But at this point, see, I think Obama's kind of worn out the whole blame thing.
I think the American people are tired of whining.
They want, they don't want to be told why things are bad.
They want somebody who's going to either get out of the way and let it fix itself, or who is going to help fix it.
It's almost Obama talks about Republicans driven the car into a ditch.
Let's look at this whole thing as a toilet that's stopped up.
people don't want to know who did it.
They just want it flushed.
They don't care anymore how it happened.
Well, not true.
They don't care anymore who did it.
Just fix it.
In fact, that's one of the reasons Obama's in big trouble, because he convinced everybody he was gonna fix it.
Like magic.
He wasn't only gonna fix it, he's gonna get them a new kitchen.
He was gonna get them a new car.
And not one that got 30 miles to the charge.
He was gonna get them a real car.
He was gonna get them a new house.
He was gonna get them out of their mortgage indebtedness.
He was gonna let them keep their home.
All this magic, he was gonna do it.
Obama was gonna fix it.
He made people think that just by showing up and being immaculated, things would magically be fixed.
Not only did that not happen, he started blaming the other guy.
People are fed up with the blame.
So I'm just telling you, Obama's gonna keep doing what he's doing.
He's gonna blame.
He's a narcissist.
He's a liberal.
They always blame everybody else.
I'm just telling you.
But I'm also telling you I don't think it's gonna work anymore.
Because it turns out he wasn't the one we've been waiting for.
It turns out they weren't the ones we've been waiting for.
We are.
After all this time, we're the ones that everybody's been waiting for.
Not him, not his idiotic jackass policies, us.
So just because he's gonna blame the Republicans, you gotta have hope.
You gotta have faith, you gotta have some confidence that he isn't automatically going to get away with it.
You think people they're sharpton on TV.
People are gonna buy into what Al Sharpton says?
Uh the Reverend Jackson, the usual suspects of the Democrat Party.
Why all of a sudden, just because the Republicans win an election, are the Democrats gonna have credibility?
Why is that?
How's that happen?
The Republicans win and win big, and all of a sudden the country loves Democrats again.
Let me ask you this.
Have the sea levels gone down?
Have the levels of the ocean began to fall?
No.
Are the polar bears still on those tiny little blocks of ice?
Yes.
The Democrats show us pictures of this all the time.
Look at this headline.
This is from Alaska.fWS Fish and Wildlife Service.
This is a government website.
The headline is this report killer whales preying on Alaska Sea Otters.
No kidding.
A report by government scientists identifies killer whales as the number one reason there are so few sea otters in Southwest Alaska.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services proposed five-year, $15 million recovery plan for sea otters in the Aleutian Islands, considered a slew of possible reasons for the low numbers found in some areas.
The draft recovery plan released this week said there is only one threat considered to have high importance: predation by killer whales, with sharks perhaps being a factor.
The report says there may be few actions that can be taken to mitigate predation by killer whales.
But the sea otter recovery program should search for solutions and be open to novel ideas.
Now isn't this what killer whales do?
Killer whales eat sea otters.
Maybe it's time to stop saving the whales.
Maybe the problem is the whales.
Maybe the problem is we've been too busy saving the whales.
So there are so many whales that they're hungry out there and they're eating more otters than normal.
Maybe our focus has been all wrong.
So if we if if if we're gonna embark on a plan to eliminate the sea otter from the diet of the killer whale, and somebody, what the hell is a killer whale gonna eat them?
And how are we gonna tell the killer whales, by the way, you can't eat those otters anymore?
How are we gonna get that message out?
We're gonna put signs out under the surface of the ocean.
And we'll have to keep adjusting the signs lower because sea levels are going to keep going down.
We're going to make the dolphins tell the killer whales, by the way, you guys, you can't eat any more sea otters.
And we spent 15 million dollars that we don't have to study something everybody knows.
School kids at Prince William Sound can tell you sea otters are eaten by killer whales.
They have seen it.
Sea otters cleaned up after the Exon Valdez oil spill.
Symbolic sea otters sent back out to the wild, let the kids out of school one day, the bands playing, everybody's happy.
Corn dogs are being served at the concession stands.
And they roll this little otter out in a cage, release the door of the cage, otter swims out on its back, it's waving at the kids, everything.
Ooh, look at how cute it is.
And here comes Orca.
Out of nowhere and chomps down on the sea otter, the band stops playing, the kids start crying to look at mommy say, What happened?
I don't know, call a fish and wildlife service.
The orca didn't get the memo not to eat the sea otter.
Rush, why are you spending so much time on this?
Because it's stupid.
We're spending $15 million trying to tell nature to stop being nature.
We spent $15 million to find it.
The biggest threat to sea otters is whales and sharks, which we already knew.
And by the way, the otters know it too.
They know when they see a killer whale paddling the other way.
We're going to put signs out there.
This is the kind of sophistry stupidity that we're having to deal with.
All over the place.
I'm just telling you, ladies and gentlemen, if Obama was going to get away with blaming Republicans, he would be getting away with it now.
Very simple.
If Obama could blame Bush for the economy when the Democrats completely control Congress in 2007, he's going to have a tough time blaming the GOP when they just control the house.
It's not automatic he's going to get away with it.
I was just trying to prepare you for the fact it's going to happen.
And we'll come back.
Angela Merkel.
This is incredible.
She said that Germany's attempt to create a multicultural society has utterly failed.
And it does fail every single damn time it's tried.
Everything liberals do fails.
Everything's everything that liberals force on people liberalism has to be forced on people.
And it always fails.
Speaking to a meeting of young members of her Christian Democrats, Angela Merkel said, allowing people of different cultural backgrounds to live side by side without integrating had not worked in a country that is home to some four million Muslims.
This multicultural approach has failed.
It has utterly failed, she told the meeting in Potsdam, south of Berlin.
She said too little has been required of immigrants in the past and repeated her usual line they should learn German in order to get by in school and have opportunities on the labor market.
The debate over foreigners in Germany has shifted since former central banker Thelo Sarazen published a book accusing Muslim immigrants of lowering the intelligence of German society.
Told you about that book.
So everywhere, Europe is years ahead of us, trying everything that we're going through now, and it's all crumbling.
You see what's happening in France?
They're going to lower the retirement age, and there are riots because the people want the freebies they have been told they're going to get.
Liberalism doesn't work.
It fails.
It fails people, it fails cultures, it fails societies.
Liberalism Destroys.
Liberalism is purely and simply destructive.
And you see it everywhere.
And we are walking down the same path.
The American people have awakened and have seen it and don't want to go down that path and will not.
The blame game is over.
They don't care.
We don't care whose fault it is.
Just get out of the way and let us fix it now.
Back after this.
Kicking off a brand new week of broadcast excellence, Rush Limboy, half my brain.
Tie it behind my back, just to make it fair, to Detroit.
This is Bob.
I'm glad you waved it, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you here.
Rosh, how are you doing, buddy?
Very good.
Thanks.
Good.
Hey, uh, I'm still mad as hell from over two hours ago.
Uh local uh station here did an interview with uh Tom Dashell about the health care.
And I I'm telling you, man, they that guy is way out there.
He's beyond out there.
You know, trying to sell that health care program.
I'm not buying it.
To me, it's like, you know, it's like chicken noodle soup.
And all they have in it is chicken bouillon cubes and maybe a few carrots and celery.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
I don't see any noodles throughout in there.
Wait, wait, wait just a second here.
Oh, okay.
What the hell is Dashell doing in Detroit?
No, he was being interviewed by our uh Frank Beckman here, our radio uh talk show just before you come on.
Yeah, I understand that, but I mean, uh was he doing I don't know if he was here.
No, no.
Let me finish.
What's he doing selling health care?
What why don't what I don't know, but I tell you, I I I was just living the house and I turned it on, and I was in the middle towards the end of it, and he was Frank was just going toe to toe with them, and he was he couldn't come up with facts.
And uh then uh Frank mentioned the part about his brother coming down with that uh cancer where he was overseas in Japan, and he brought him back to this country for medical care, and Frank says, Was it because we have the best care here?
And he wouldn't answer that.
Oh, I don't know.
You know.
Um, you know, I think that's quite illustrative of something.
The health care bill's passed.
It's the law of the land.
And Tom Dashall is in Detroit selling it.
Meanwhile, Democrats are running against it all over the country, want no part of it, and yet Dashell is in Detroit.
Detroit.
What do they have to sell anything on Obama in Detroit?
There aren't any jobs there.
There's uh bulldozing houses, but still they're voting, they're voting Democrat there.
Well, why in the world is Dashell in Detroit selling health care?
I mean, that's that's as big an indication of how lost these people are.
I mean, this is it's order the law of the land.
Anyway, Bob, thanks for the call.
Appreciate it.
Uh, Randy in Asheville, North Carolina, you're next.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
It's a great honor to talk to you.
Thank you very much, sir.
Um, I also want to ask you, why isn't there pressure on Nancy Pelosi to step down as Speaker of the House for the good of her party?
In other words, where's her sacrifice to the calls?
Why isn't there similar requests on the part of Obama to step aside to save his party?
No, for Nancy Pelosi to step down as speaker.
Well, she's not alone.
Obama's doing a good job destroying the party, and so's Harry Reed.
Well, I agree, but you know, there was the Republican pump pundits who were saying, you know, Christine O'Donnell is gonna jeopardize the GOP's chance for getting the Senate.
But I could make a greater argument that Pelosi is hurting her party from keeping the house.
I mean, because these Democrats are out here having to run against the Republican pony, but also having her as sort of, you know, the ugly stepchild that keeps rearing her head and whatnot are internal pressure to get her to to say, you know, I'll step down just to at least mitigate the loss of seats that they're gonna lose.
Well, I'm trying to think of an analogy here.
Okay.
Where where is the clamor in North Korea for Kim Jong-il to step aside?
Point taken.
Yeah, I mean, who who who's who's going who's going to do this?
Well, you're right, but I'm not sure.
I mean, I'm sure I'm sure a lot of Democrats are privately running around cursing her.
I mean, as I said earlier, there are Democrats who have their current their political careers are on the verge of being over because of Obamacare, because she pushed them to vote for it.
And we warned them a lot of blue dogs.
We warned them.
You tie yourself to Pelosi and your career is finished.
But that's it's nobody's gonna demand that she step aside.
I mean, that's that would be great if it did, but we can't just don't expect that.
Bloomfield, uh, Connecticut.
This Judy, you're next.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey Rush, how are you doing?
I just love you.
You're about the only thing that stood between me and an aneurysm the last two years.
I I wanted to respond to the lady that called and said, how do we keep them from winning in 2012?
And I have two thoughts.
And the first one is that I think that Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, who are wonderful men, and are trying to represent us as best they can.
I think they need to step aside and let Paul Ryan, Michelle Bachman, Eric Cantor, hopefully Sean Bielak, Christine O'Donnell, Sharon Angel, they need to step aside and let these young young um Congress people get their get their um word.
That's not that's not gonna happen.
You're you're not gonna have these guys say, you know what?
We're the problem.
And we're gonna turn it over to these guys who are the success.
They're gonna have to be forced out.
This is not this is not how it happens.
Uh you found two calls in a row who wonder why people don't quit.
Step aside.
Or whether it for it isn't gonna happen.
I I it's they're gonna have to be forced out.
These guys are not gonna say, yep, we're the problem, so we'll leave.
Give me Soundbite 7 again.
At least when I go to the soundbites.
I mean, I want it right now, but I'm gonna have it have it standing by.
Look, why don't all the hosts at MSNBC resign?
Why don't all of talent at CNN resign?
You know, why doesn't Obama resign?
Why do all these people step aside?
By the way, fellow what Dashell's doing.
Dashell has a book out.
Dashell is on a book promotion tour.
That's what he was doing with Frank Beckman of WJR.
It didn't make sense.
I mean, his Obama I know he was originally going to be one of the health care guys, but to be running around now selling health care, d it doesn't make any sense.
I know she was doing that, I'm sure it's part of his book.
But what he's doing is selling his book.
And let's just keep a sharp eye on how many copies of his lame book Dashel sells.
I'll be very, very interested in that.
Who's next?
Robin uh in Greenville, South Carolina.
Hi, and welcome to the EIB network.
Uh greetings, Rush.
Uh 24-7 dittoes and respect.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Hey, uh in the on the website hot air today, there was a link to an interview uh with Bloomberg where Transportation Secretary Lahood says that he may push for an all-out ban on the practice of cell phones in cars, even if it's conducted with hands-free technology.
Yeah.
Yeah, I I I didn't specifically see that, but I'm not surprised because I think it's been trending in uh in this direction.
Well, here's my question, Rush, is are does that mean that the police and fire departments have to give up using their car radios?
No.
Will FedEx and UPS have to give up communicating with their drivers?
Uh maybe.
Well probably not.
So how many lives have been saved because people have been able to use their cell phones to call in traffic action?
Yeah, uh see, it's not about saving lives.
That's just the smokescreen.
It's not about saving lives.
What do you think the real reason might be that a federal government, a massive government, might be interested in forcing people to not use their cell phones as much.
Remember now, this is not an isolated incident.
Cell phones created danger while driving.
For the years they have been telling us that cell phones cause brain cancer.
They have been trying to scare us out of using our cell phones for a long time.
Why do you think that might be?
Cell phones, like automobiles, are a singular expression and illustration of unlimited freedom.
Cell phones allow people to organize.
People of similar viewpoints organize, plan meetings and so forth to say oppose the government.
Totalitarian states, authoritarian states, statists, wish to limit the communicative abilities of the population as much as possible.
They try to, well, look at the old Soviet Union.
Look at how much news do you think there is in North Korea?
How much real news do you think there is in communist China?
How much news is there in in Cuba?
To authoritarian statist regimes, the free flow of information is the greatest threat to their existence.
So here come cell phones.
Automobile accidents, hands free.
Yep, big danger.
Too many people texting, too many people making phone calls.
We gotta make and isn't practically everything liberals do oriented toward making the world safer?
Like incandescent light bulbs going away for compact fluorescence and these uh little smart cars uh and and electric cars and hybrid cars that get squished by bigger trucks and so forth, the whole quest to make people safer actually ends up killing more people.
Liberalism, socialism, communism is responsible for more deaths than cell phones could ever hope to be.
Liberalism, socialism, communism responsible for more deaths than cancer.
Yet everything they do is predicated on saving us from ourselves.
Everything they do is predicated on keeping us safe.
Michelle, my butt uh Michelle, my Bell Obama.
Out there talking about nutrition.
You can't eat that, you shouldn't eat that.
She's making field trips to food manufacturers, trying to um force them to alter the way they manufacture food.
The mayor of New York demanding that you cannot eat trans fats or salt or what have you.
All of this under the guise of what?
Making us healthier, making us safer.
But what has to happen?
We all have to lose some freedom for this stuff to be successful.
We have to give up the freedom to use our cell phone, which in an emergency comes in pretty handy in a car.
We all have to give up sugared soft drinks.
Our kids cannot get subsidized school lunches if vending machines selling potato chips are gonna be on site.
All of this designed to make us healthier or to protect us, to make us safer, and yet, for all of it to happen, we have to give up some freedom.
Or we have to see it taken away from us rather than give it up.
How long have they been studying?
Whether or not cell phones cause brain cancer for crying out loud, folks?
How long have they been studying this?
And isn't there a new study every year that makes it even more and more possible?
And isn't it every year it becomes more and more frightening?
Brain tumors and cancer and other types of cancer could be from extended cell phone use.
And now automobile accidents?
Even if you are on a hands-free phone, it's not guaranteed to protect you from an accident.
Yet we would not have the safe air traffic control system we have in this country were it not for continuous radio communications between the pilots and the ground controllers.
Even when airplanes land, they have to contact ground control at airports for taxi instructions.
Pilots and co-pilots are in constant quasi cell phone communication with somebody during flights, particularly takeoff and landing, and taxiing.
Now you would think that we would have to take radios out of airplanes because the pilots being distracted.
And those are hands-free.
They're not actually holding the radio communications gear in their hands.
It's all hands-free.
So is it really about phones distracting people and causing accidents?
When's the last time you heard of an accident being caused by somebody on the phone in the car?
Most accidents are because SUVs take over and wipe out somebody, right?
Accidents involving SUVs, traditionally reported as though the driver doesn't even exist.
I'm being facetious here.
But just stop and think.
Every time one of these proposals comes along to make us safer, to make us healthier, in order for it to happen, we must give up.
Either voluntarily or by force, some freedom.
I have said it time and time again.
As in the case of cell phones, the issue is never the issue.
Okay, so Lahood goes out there and says, Well, cell phones, um they're dangerous.
We need uh we need to ban cell phones.
That's not the issue.
Cell phones are not the issue.
There's something else going on.
They either want to raise taxes to use your cell phone, or there's something more nefarious than that, and that is limit your ability to use a cell phone, period.
Because they don't like all the extended communication ability a cell phone provides.
But the issue is never the issue.
Remember when they said the SUV has to be banned.
The issue is never the that's global warming.
The issue is never the issue.
There's always something else.
Uh, folks, the Heritage Foundation has uh just put out one of the best modern day answers to the question, why is America exceptional?
Now we know America's exceptional, but in the rhetoric and conversation, being able to clearly answer the question of why sometimes gets complicated.
You know, I have my theory.
A lot of people think American exceptionalism means we're better people than everybody else, and that's not what it means.
To heritage, it's real simple.
This nation was created with a creed that states that all men possess certain rights and that government derives its powers from the consent of the governed.
That's why you and I believe this nation is so exceptional.
It was the first founded under such a premise.
But some people in positions of leadership today don't seem to think the same way.
Now, today is the first day you can join Heritage Foundation as a member and receive a free copy of why is America exceptional.
It's also available to the 700,000 person strong membership of Heritage 2.
So if you're already a member, you get it.
It's not a bait and switch.
I I honestly believe it's in the best interests of our country to support organizations like Heritage, organizations that provide the quality and the quantity of truthful information in the ear of spin coming from the left.
So make yourself a member.
Go to Askheritage.org.
That's where you do it.
Become a member.
Heritage will send a copy of this new release.
Doesn't cost much.
Uh membership start at $25 a year.
And you would not have access to some of the finest consistent conservative thinking on the planet.
Ask heritage.org.
Karen in the Northeast.
Parts unknown.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
Thank you for taking my call.
Thank you.
Um, I just have a question.
Uh, what should I do?
Question.
I am a teacher in the same school my son attends.
And his teacher is having the class and him write an essay on how to help Obama advances agenda.
I obviously did not want him to write this.
So I took the teacher aside and they said, Look, I don't want my son to write this.
She she's actually a friend of mine.
They said, Come on, you know how I stand.
Please don't do this.
I don't want him to get an F. It's not right what you're doing, and I think other parents are gonna complain.
No other parents complained, and if he doesn't do it, he's gonna get an F. I'm afraid, since I'm not tenured, that if I make too much noise or I go to the principal, that I I can uh it could affect my job.
I could lose my job, but I don't want to not do anything and show my son that we just sit back and retake whatever the liberals give us.
Yeah.
It's a toughie.
So here's you you're afraid of losing your job.
You're afraid of your your son being punished.
Uh you're afraid of being a lone woman there.
Yes.
Um what can you do?
I think the assignment is to write an essay on how to help Obama accomplish his agenda.
Yes.
Is that the assignment?
Yes, that's the assignment.
Oh, yeah.
Write a paper with the premise that it's impossible for Obama to achieve his agenda and for America to remain America.
I mean, just tackle it head on.
Really?
Okay.
Tackle it head on.
Okay, you want my kid to write an essay on how to advance Obama's agenda, and I'm gonna write on what would happen if that did happen.
And we'd lose America.
So he fulfills, he fulfills the assignment, he writes something unique, and then if he gets punished, he's punished for content and the way he's thinking, not for lack of completion of the assignment.
And then you have a reason to make a case that your kid is being singled out for what he believes.
That your teacher is trying to indoctrinate him into a certain kind of belief.
And that's not what education is.
Education is education, not indoctrination.
So if you believe, and if your c if your son believes that Obama's agenda is harmful, write an essay on that.
Okay.
That's what I would do.
And then apply to Hillsdale College when you get kicked out.
You know, I I I would I that's that's exactly what I would do.
I just ram it back down their throats.
If you feel that outnumbered, and you want you don't want to lose tenure.
I I I would just complete the assignment on the basis that the premise is wrong.
Just don't accept the premise, but you'll do the assignment.
You'll do the essay.
Okay.
Don't insult a teacher in the essay.
Don't insult the teacher.
Take it seriously.
I believe Obama's agenda would harm the country if it passes, and here's why.
This is why I will not help advance the agenda.
That's great advice.
I know.
No, that's what I mean.
That's that's that's what I would do.
Now it's easy for me to say it's not my son, and I'm not you in the school.
It's much easier for me.
I know it's probably a daunting thing to actually do, but that's what I would do in that society.
I mean, I feel like I'm the only conservative in that school, and I I see what the teachers do, and it gets me upset.
And it's one of the reasons I became a teacher, because I want the kids to learn uh the right way to learn uh objectively, to learn about the Constitution and how our country was founded and the greatness of America.
And I'm trying to undo all the indoctrination that I see teaching.
Well, okay.
Then this is made to order.
You're trying to undo it, then do it in the belly of the beast.
Do it in response to this indoctrination attempt.
Stand your ground.
You want to try to indoctrinate my kid, we're gonna try to indoctrinate you.
We don't think the agenda's right.
We don't think it's good for America.
That's what I would do.
That's what I would do.
Thank you.
I I was looking for something because my husband said no, don't do anything, just let it go.
Well, see, that's that's that's I know that's the easy thing.
Don't make waves.
Don't don't confront authority this way.
This your your son is young.
This is just one teacher, let's not uh blum, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
But you know me.
I mean, I I just kind of stuff, I just I I I couldn't take it.
If if if I had a kid in this circumstance, this would not fly.
And I'd find a way to smack him right in the face with their own idea.
Now, Snerdley tells me I got four people on the line telling me I am wrong with my take on cell phones.
Snerdley knows for a fact there have never Been in the history of this program, four people on hold at the same time telling me I'm wrong.
And it's all on my take on hands-free cell phones and cell phones being uh prohibited.
We don't can't take any calls today, Snerdley.
As you see, we're sadly out of time.
But he's getting some numbers.
We'll talk to these people tomorrow, maybe.
Hey, Karen, in the Northeast, here is the essay.
This is what your kid should write.
To help Obama achieve his agenda, get rid of Congress, get rid of the Supreme Court, and shred the Constitution and turn that in.
That's all you write.
▲
Export Selection