All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 15, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:36
October 15, 2010, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's Friday, fastest week in media.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
800 282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address, L Rushball at EIB net.com.
The final hour for you as a caller to show the world how a talk show should be done.
I say that with loving jest.
Seriously, whatever you want to talk about on Friday pretty much is fair game.
All you have to do is convince Snerdley in five seconds that you're qualified to go on the air.
You know, I've never divulged this before, but that's about the time you have as a caller.
Ten seconds at the most.
Screening is an art.
If you snurdly knows, first five, ten seconds max, whether you can cut it.
And after they just being nice, uh, well, that's not even guaranteed.
That uh that'll be nice.
So 800-282-2882 is the number if you want to be on the program.
Newsweek magazine.
The passion of Harry Reed, Senator flails against angle in Nevada debate.
Newsweek says that uh dingy Harry came off as wooden, inarticulate, and shiftless.
Shiftless.
Shiftless.
Mr. Snerdley, about whom was that comment or descriptive, usually.
That used to be a racial pejorative.
I thought it was.
I I my my uh well honed and oiled memory.
Shiftless was a pejorative racial term.
Oh yeah, it was.
And so here's Newsweek under new ownership for one dollar, referring to Dingy Harry as wooden, inarticulate, and shiftless.
My guess is that Dingy Harry today is probably scared shiftless.
But I mean to be described that way.
And Kristen O'Donnell cuts her lead in half in the Rasperson.
And I just watched Obama on TV in uh in Delaware.
Man, he's looking off a cocky up there.
He I didn't hear him.
I didn't, I didn't see what he said.
I didn't read the closed captioning, but he's standing up there looking cocky as he can be.
Was he not, Snerdley?
Am I misreading this?
Is that what he said?
Dingy Harry.
So Obama was telling the people of Delaware this is a close race.
Don't, don't, don't think of anything.
Really?
Don't sit on your hands.
This isn't a gimme.
He's talking about O'Donnell versus the uh Marxist guy, bearded Marxist.
What's his name?
Wonder why I cannot remember this guy's name.
When I look at him, I can understand why I don't remember his name, but you'd think I would remember his name.
He looks like he's not even there.
He looks like the head coach of Minnesota Vikings, who doesn't run that team, Brett Farbrett Farbrett Favre does.
Uh what's that guy's name?
Childress.
Brad Chili Childress.
This coons guy looks like that, and then not as good as Childress looks.
I'll bet you I'll forget his name even before the end of the show today.
I'll bet you have to ask you again what this bearded Marxist Delaware guy's name is.
At any rate, uh Obama and Bightney are in there, and they're saying do not sit on your hands.
This is not over.
I I did I never thought this race was the runaway slam dunk.
From the from the minute I heard that only Mike Castle could win this.
Then folks, it's just my instincts.
You know, I honestly uh to maybe my detriment.
I don't really put a lot of stock in election polls that are months out, uh, three, four weeks out.
I just don't.
Uh I don't know why.
It just doesn't interest me.
I'd rather follow my instincts, my instincts on this, because the way people on our side, not so much a Democrats, way people on our side were treating this race and treating Christine O'Donnell.
Uh, and it just is something, you know, this this is ripe for a lot of people get hit upside the head with a giant shock and surprise.
Uh and a lot of that, I'm sure is wishful thinking on my part.
But I never did, bottom line, believe this a close race.
Or I mean uh uh a slam dunk runaway.
I never thought that she never had a chance.
And there are a lot of people on our side who thought she didn't have a chance, and they didn't want her to have a chance.
Their noses were so out of joint that Castle didn't win that they didn't want the Republicans to win.
So she's cut the lead in half.
Obama's in there saying, Don't sit on your hands.
This is not a slam dunk, and he knows.
This would be a profound, this is the bite me seat.
If she wins, if O'Donnell wins, this is that's that that would be as big as Ted Kennedy's uh seat going Republican.
It really would.
We have the soundbite.
This is James McGovern.
We had a caller reference this.
Uh the guy said the Constitution is wrong.
Shrewsbury at Massachusetts earlier this week at a debate, congressional candidates for Massachusetts III, James McGovern Democrat said this is about money in politics and the Constitution.
Here's the problem.
We have a lousy Supreme Court decision that has opened up the floodgates.
And so we have to deal within the realm of constitutionality.
And a lot of the campaign finance bills that we have passed have been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
I think the Constitution is wrong.
I don't think money is the same thing as human beings.
I don't think money equals free speech.
I don't think I don't think corporate corporations should have the same equality as uh as as a regular voter in the in this.
Well, there you have it.
I don't I don't I don't uh I think Constitution is wrong.
I I don't think corporations um should have the same equality as a regular voter.
Who is corporations?
McGovern is saying exactly what Obama said during his State of the Union.
And that's when Alito shook his head.
This is exactly what Obama said when Alito shook his head and said, nope, you're wrong.
Yeah, the decision wasn't wrong.
The Constitution's wrong.
And the Democrats are hellbent on on fixing the uh Constitution.
All right, media implosion time.
Time to illustrate.
Chris Matthews, we have a couple of sound bites from Hard Boiled Last Night first on Christine O'Donnell.
The one charming thing, I hope this isn't charming thing about Christine O'Donnell is that she was who she is.
Now she's reading the talking points from Randy Schuneman, this intellectual that's supposedly making uh Sarah Palin into something of an intellectual.
Complete talking points.
Anyone could be reading this crap.
She shouldn't be a ditto head.
Talking about talking about whoever this Shineman guy is that's writing the talking points for O'Donnell and Palin.
Anybody can read this crap.
Who is it that's got the teleprompter who cannot live without it?
Chris.
Who is it?
Who is the smartest guy in politics?
Who's the most brilliant man to ever trod the political soil?
Who is it that was going to make the world love us?
Who is going to lower the seas?
Who is going to make sure that there was no racism and no partisanship?
Total unity.
Who was it?
This bright, articulate, young, clean guy.
Who is it that can't survive in a classroom of eight-year-olds without a teleprompter?
Is that Christine O'Donnell?
Is that Sharon Angle?
Or would that be Barack Obama?
We all know the answer.
Matthews did a um one of his um big time commentaries last night about the Chilean miners.
What a story of human faith, hope, charity, and yes, community.
I know that last word drives the right crazy.
Community.
Theirs is the popular notion that it's every man for himself.
Grab what you can, screw the masses, cash out of the government, the whole cowboy catechism.
But how would those miners have survived and their loved ones living above if they'd behave like that with the attitude of every man for himself?
This coming election now looks to be a process very different.
What it promises to be is a huge number of Americans withdrawing their confidence in the ability of us to work together and to build a common community.
It's headed towards something quite un-American, a statement that we are not all in this together.
For that I blame the people who even now seek to meet their need for notoriety by nightly yelling fire in the movie theater by convincing those who still have jobs that their worst enemies are those who don't.
I, for the life of me, do not know what he's talking about.
The people who still have jobs.
Their worst enemies are those who don't.
Does this make any sense?
This is you this this the ability of us to work together to build a common community.
We didn't we elect a guy that said he was going to do that.
We got more divisions, racial and otherwise, political, than we had when this guy was immaculated.
Anyway, this is all emblematic of the implosion taking place.
There was supposed to be magic.
Things that had never happened before were supposed to happen just by virtue of Obama taking the oath of office and assuming his rightful post in the oval orifice.
And we all know now this Peter Baker piece in the New York Times, this has got them all discombobulated.
This thing we talked about yesterday shows up Sunday in the New York Times magazine.
They're all beside themselves.
Obama's making excuses for himself, he's apologizing, admitting to his mistakes, admitting he has to learn.
He's really what he's done is throw the media overboard because he has essentially said they lied about him.
When they told us how brilliant he was, how competent, how capable, how wonderful.
They're the ones that sold us on this bill of goods of Obama.
They are the ones that passed off this messianic impression.
Now, Obama goes to the pages of the New York Times and blows it sky high.
And who is it that takes the lumps for that?
It's people like Matthews and these other clowns who spread this drivel that a community organizer is the least qualified man in any room he walks into, no matter what room it is, was the best thing that ever happened to American politics.
Now he's telling them he's not and never was.
And it's gotten so bad, the ego's so bad that if he can't make it, nobody can be great.
If Obama can't be a great president, damn it, nobody can.
Because there's nobody better than Obama, and if he can't pull it off, then the system's so screwed up, Washington's so screwed up, nobody can do it.
Poor Obama.
He had the media in one hand, he had the Congress in the other hand.
He had the world media helping him out.
He had everybody telling lies about his qualifications, everybody covering up all the negative stuff.
Nobody did one anal exam of his.
Nobody did any due diligence.
Nobody delved into his past to tell the American people just who the guy is.
Because it didn't matter.
He was constructed as somebody to be whatever any individual wanted him to be.
Now the crash to reality and the media is imploding.
Pat Cadell, Daily Caller, this is Chatsworth Osborne Jr.'s website.
Veteran Democrat operative Pat Cadell, he was big with Jimmy Carter, is unloading on the White House, saying he's had enough with the president whose hypocrisy on campaign finance is just mind-blowing.
Obama has made a point while campaigning to call out conservative leaning groups for hurting the integrity of elections by not voluntarily disclosing donors.
Cadell says Obama's got no room to talk.
My problem with Obama started the day he blew up public financing of presidential campaigns.
He's the man who's done the most to destroy whatever integrity there was in campaign financing.
And this is a Democrat saying this.
The administration's attacks, Cadell said, on groups like the Chamber of Commerce and donors like the conservative Koch brothers.
Reek of McCarthyism.
This would be David and Charles Koch.
He's talking about.
I was the youngest person on Richard Nixon's enemies list.
I take this stuff seriously.
What they're doing is Nixonian.
It's McCarthyite.
Cadell says you're 21 days out from an election.
This is what you've got.
That's it.
Nothing about jobs or the economy.
So he's in the Bob Schiefer camp.
Looking for something big.
This all you got for me?
Chamber commerce taking foreign money.
Cadell also took a swing at Obama's inner circle.
Quote, these are naive idiots who've come out of academia.
They've never done anything in their lives.
None nothing, anything real.
And they're actually in power.
These are the people we never let in a room when we had serious business to do.
And now they're running the country.
That's as good a description of this regime as I've read.
People have come out of academia, have never done anything real in their lives, and they're actually in power.
These are the people we never let in the room when we had serious business to do, meaning Carter years.
Now they are running the country.
One caveat, whoever they did let in the room was no better.
We have to say that.
Lamenting the fact that the miners would be dead.
The miners would be dead if left to people like the Tea Party.
Hey, Chris, I just did a quick question.
Uh can you provide me a list of community organizers or community organizer groups credited with getting the miners out of there?
Uh was Acorn down there?
I haven't heard.
Was Andy Stern the SEIU were they down there?
Um was there any any group people voted for Obama, contributed to Obama?
Is anybody in his circle down there to help save the miners, or was it?
A lot of corporations were listed as helping.
I I didn't see any community organizers down there getting the miners out, did you?
Daniel Hemminger in the Wall Street Journal yesterday.
Needs to be said the rescue of the Chilean miners smashing victory for free market capitalism.
The president is campaigning across the country, making this statement of nearly every stop.
The basic idea is if we put our blind faith in the market and we let corporations do whatever they want, and we leave everybody else defend for themselves, and America somehow automatically is gonna grow and prosper.
Uh yeah, that's a caricature of the basic idea, but basically that's right.
Ask the miners.
If those miners had been trapped a half mile down like this twenty-five years ago, anywhere on earth they'd be dead.
What happened over the past 25 years that meant the difference between life and death for these men?
Short answer, the center rock drill bit.
This is the miracle bit that drilled down to the trapped miners.
Center Rock Inc., a private company in Berlin, Pennsylvania, 74 employees.
The drills rig came from Shram Incorporated, Westchester, Pennsylvania.
Seeing the disaster, Center Rock's president Brandon Fisher called the Chileans to offer his drill.
Chile accepted.
The miners are alive.
This profit equals innovation dynamic was everywhere at the Chilean mine.
The high strength cable winding around the big wheel atop the simple rig is from Germany.
Japan supplied the super flexible fiber optic communications cable that linked the miners to the world above.
Samsung of South Korea supplied a cell phone that has its own projector.
Jeffrey Gabby, founder of Cupron Inc.
in Richmond, Virginia supplied socks made with copper fiber that consumed foot bacteria and minimized odor and infection.
Chile's health minister, Jaime Manalik said I never realized that kind of thing actually existed.
That's right, in an open economy, you'll never know what's out there on the leading developmental edge of this or that industry, but the reality behind the miracles is the same.
Someone innovates something useful, makes money from it, reinvates, or someone else trumps the innovation.
Most of the time nobody notices.
All it does is create jobs, wealth, and well being.
But without this system running in the background, without the year over year progress embedded in these capitalist innovations, those trapped miners would be dead.
The miners' rescue is a thrilling moment for Chile, an impramater on its rising status, but I'm thinking of that 74 person outfit in Berlin, Pennsylvania.
Whose high tech drill bit opened the earth to free, and that's a huge bit.
Twenty-one inches is huge.
You know there are tens of thousands of stories like this in the U.S., as big as Google, as small as Center Rock.
I'm glad one of them helped save the Chileans.
What's needed now is a new American economic model that lets our innovators rescue the rest of us.
So Dan Henniger here has got as exactly right as Chris Matthews gets it laughably wrong.
And we got to take another brief yet obscene profit break.
Be right back.
Back to the phones we go open line Friday.
Rush Limbaugh to Harry in Suffolk, Virginia.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Good afternoon, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
Yeah.
I just want to quickly address this California Nags president uh Perry Bellisama.
Yeah.
Uh referring to Mrs. Whitman or Ms. Whitman as a uh political whore.
That's right.
And she used the premise that she sold out Californians for an endorsement and independent expenditures in her campaign, I assume for some uh vote later uh to be followed in later in when she gets elected.
And I I'm just sitting here thinking about what the hypocrisy is in that, because if you use her premise by definition, isn't she and all the nags political whores?
Well, uh gotta have customers.
And for the nags, that's a challenge.
But uh but I I get your drift.
I mean, in a in a theoretical sense, yes, it's irrefutable what you say.
Well, I just was was struck by that, you know, and and I just couldn't help but get past it, so I thought, well, I'll give you a call and talk to you and see what you think.
I think it's brilliant.
I think you're you're uh you're more than absolutely right.
And actually, you know, she makes a she makes the point about herself more uh directly than anybody else.
You know, these these babes.
Hell, what am I saying?
Babe, these women are not even oriented towards women interest.
You know, as I have said, feminism is just uh uh an arm of liberalism.
I mean, they come out and endorse Jerry Brown, even though somebody in his aide called Meg Whitman a whore.
But everybody knows that the the nags are not a women's interest group, it's just it's like the animal rights crowd, global warming.
They're all liberals.
Or socialist Marxists, you know, to one degree or another.
It's the way they camouflage themselves.
They've got to change their name.
National Organization for Women, we call them the Nags, National Association of Gals.
They changed their name to the National Organization of W words.
Because that's what they are themselves.
He just said it.
He's exactly right.
Jordan in Daytona Beach, Florida.
Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program.
Nice to have you here.
Hey, Rush, how are you?
Good.
I have a question for you that may seem obvious, but I would first like to uh give you a premise before you answer my question.
All right.
Okay, I attend college and I'm an American government class.
There are 40 students in the class, and the professor asked us, who of you um are content with the amount of taxes that come out of your paycheck?
Only one in forty students said that they were content with the amount of taxes that they're paying to the government.
However, when he asked how many people vote Democrat, it was almost half.
Now, in addressing the you know, the kind of hypocrisy there that you know the how we know that the Democrats are not for tax cuts, they're for tax increases.
Right.
Um, my question for you is what is to make us think that the American people won't believe the mainstream media once again and blame Republicans for all the mess that Obama and the Democrats have created.
You know I love this question, but you're a college student, right?
Yes.
I've been getting this question for 25 years.
Every year, multiple times a year, I get the because you your life experience is that the media is going to blame the Republicans for whatever goes wrong, no matter who's to blame for it.
And therefore, you don't see any change.
For me, in the last twenty five years, there has been worlds of change.
They still blame the Republicans, but they don't get away with it as often as they do.
Not nearly.
Look at the Tea Party.
Look at the drive-by media shrinking.
New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, they are shrinking.
Their influence and their sphere of influence is shrinking.
They still do it.
You're right.
The template is still blame Republicans for everything.
I have a question for you first.
Of these 40 college students, how many of them in there actually get a paycheck to even know what their taxes are?
That was my first reaction.
Well, see, that's what they uh that's what he asked.
He said, only answer if you have a job and pay taxes.
But you know, I would assume that these people who raise their hands are are mostly making minimum wage and therefore getting their taxes all back in the next year.
So I mean, they really you're dealing with sort of a flawed test group here because their their their earnings are not nearly what they're going to be.
Well, what they were going to be before Obama.
Uh but your your other question was to say the Republicans won't be blamed.
They they will be.
In fact, let me prepare you.
Let me give you my theorem as to what's going to happen.
Republicans are going to win big, the House of Representatives.
I think that's a given.
Even if they don't win the House, they're going to take away the Democrats' supermajority.
They don't win the Senate, they're going to get close to that.
But a lot of people think they're going to win the House.
I think, and I have astutely pointed this out on previous occasions, I think it's exactly what Obama wants.
What does he need for his own re-election?
He needs to run against somebody.
He needs to have somebody to blame for the mess that he's created.
He can't and doesn't want to blame his own party even now.
Even now he's out there blaming and the media, blaming the Republicans for all this mess when the Republicans can't stop anything Obama wants to do.
Well, it isn't working.
If it was if the the thing here is that if the blame Republicans technique was working, then the Democrats should be ahead in all of these polls.
So you need to have some optimism.
I understand why you don't.
You're new to this, um, and and you get you're getting frustrated over what you see as a uh a degree of unfairness, lack of balance, bias, or what have you, but they're not getting away with it the way they used to.
That's my point to you.
Okay.
Because if they were, the Republicans wouldn't be ahead of the game.
But that doesn't mean they're going to stop using the ploy.
They're going to keep using the ploy.
Obama has created a mess.
It's a bad mess.
This is a mess that not even DDT could fix.
It's going to take a lot of time and a lot of elections to fix this.
But Obama wants to get re-elected.
He's going to have to blame somebody.
All politicians have to run against something.
And it's going to be much easier for him to blame the Republicans.
He'll say, uh, we're in a big mess.
We got all these deficits.
We got high high deficits.
We can't keep spinning our way in debt like this.
He'll say that.
And it's a Republicans who got us here.
I had brave policies in the first two years to try to try to stop this, but I couldn't.
And the Republicans did not support me at all, and now they're in charge, and now they're opposing everything I want to do.
They're opposing all of my brilliant solutions.
That's what's going to happen.
And the media is going to be right in there echoing him.
But it doesn't work.
It isn't working now.
This is what you have to realize.
It isn't working now.
If it were, if people thought the Republicans were in charge and responsible for the deficit, if they thought that Republicans were responsible for the unemployment levels, if they thought Republicans were responsible for this stinko economy, why would Republicans be looking at a landslide victory?
So the voters know.
But the voters have known before, and the press has been able to talk them out of what they know.
That's what you instinctively are aware of.
That's why the battle continues.
That's why it's never the war continues.
Battles are won and lost, but the war will go on and on and on.
It's great to have you engaged in it at your age and to have you observing the things that you're observing.
I'm glad you called.
I appreciate it.
Now we've got to take a it just never ends here, folks.
He said seen profit timeouts in the fastest three hours in media.
But again, we'll be back before you know it.
If you are just joining us, earlier in the program, we had some sound bites from the debate last night between Sharon Angle and Dingy Harry Reed.
During this debate, Dingy Harry, Lamb base of the insurance companies again, and uh health care reform in general.
Insurance companies don't do things out of the goodness of their hearts.
They do it out of a profit motive, and they have almost destroyed our economy.
We need them to be forced to do mammograms.
That's why you see breast cancer awareness month.
You see the baseball players wearing pink shoes, and you see the football players having pink uh helmets.
You detect it if you do mammograms.
Colonoscopies.
If you do colonoscopies, colon cancer does not come because you snip off the things they find when they go up and no more.
And we need to have have the insurance companies do this.
It'll save money in the long run to do this.
All right, so uh you got football players wearing pink helmets.
But the important thing here is you just you just listen to the most powerful man in the United States Senate, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reed, arguably the second or third most powerful man in our government, describing colonoscopies.
If you do colonoscopies, colon cancer does not come because you snip off the things they find when they go up and more.
It makes me wonder if at some point they snipped off something and more of Dingy Harry's when they went up there.
The more I listen to him talk, it's just we're supposed to believe that this represents enlightenment, compassion, brilliance.
I mean, this here's a guy actually advocating colonoscopies.
Go in there and snip it off when they get in there.
This is a guy that wants to be up our butts.
He's admitting it.
He got more energized during that sound bite talking about colonoscopies than at any other time in the debate.
When he envisioned being up our butts, talk about intrusive.
This guy is personifying intrusive government.
Big government up our butts.
I'm up our business, is what I mean.
And this is if you missed it.
This is among the brightest stars.
And here's another one.
Barbara Boxer.
Obviously her with the IQ of a pencil eraser.
She's on the situation room with Wolf Blitzer.
Blitzer said your opponent who I interviewed earlier, Carly Fiorina.
She says basically this charge about you that you're simply a career politician who has no experience in the real world creating jobs.
Well, she's just wrong on that.
I voted for over two trillion dollars of tax cuts.
The largest one was in the stimulus bill.
She's just wrong.
When you say you you supported two trillion dollars in tax cuts uh during the stimulus.
Yes, I have been during my career.
Oh, during your career.
I thought you just said during the stimulus.
Well, you said you supported two trillion dollars.
1.2 trillion with a stimulus.
Now, Wolf Blitzer wants her to do well.
Wolf blitzer is Bob Schiefer.
Last Sunday on Face the Nation, he's got Axelrod coming in there.
He's hoping for something big.
We're down to the nitty-gritty.
Three weeks to go.
The Republicans look to be laying on a big shellacking.
Here comes the architect of brilliance in Obama, David Axler Rodden.
Scheefer just knows he's gonna come up here with a big announcement of how they're gonna retake Congress and defeat the Republicans and make sure they don't get it.
And he comes up with this big charge, the Chamber of Commerce being infiltrated with foreign money.
And Schiefer says, You come here and get that it?
Is that all you got for me?
So Blitzer talks to Carly Fiorina says, All right, now I get to bury Fiorina.
I could box her in here.
So he brings Box.
I I voted for two trillion dollars of tax cuts in the stimulus.
Wolf uh uh when you say you supported two trillion tax cuts, yes I have.
Uh tax cuts where?
During my career.
Okay, we can bail you out here.
During your career, I thought you said during the stimulus.
Yes, I did during the stimulus.
Wolf doing his best, Bob Schiefer, trying to save Boxer.
Not even Wolf could stomach that he knows that he couldn't cover for this.
Not even with the CNN audience.
So Wolf, he wouldn't let it go.
He's stunned.
He can't believe she's actually saying this.
So he wants her to clarify it.
He wants to help her clarify this.
He says there was 1.2 trillion dollars in tax cuts in the stimulus.
Remember now the stimulus, the popular figure is $875 billion.
That's or $787.
$787 billion was the total expenditure.
She's saying there's $1.2 trillion in tax cuts.
Wolf says there was $1.2 trillion in tax cuts in the stimulus.
Well, I will put it this way.
Over time, that's what it will be when you figure all the tax cuts over time.
And what we did for the for the senior citizens giving them back those refunds.
So there was a lot.
Actually, a third of the STEM was direct tax cuts.
Yeah, but uh that I could say that would be maybe two or three hundred million dollars.
We're not talking about trillions.
So let me say this.
A third of the STEM and over my time, let me correct it.
You're right.
Thank you.
2.2 trillion I voted in tax cuts, 1.2 trillion of which became law.
A third of the STEM was tax cuts.
And it was considered the biggest tax cut in history over a couple year period.
Now we're supposed to look the other way.
When we are confronted with sheer ignorance, when we are confronted with sheer naked stupidity.
When we are staring at genuine dumbness, we're supposed to look the other way because she cares about people.
We're supposed to look the other way because she has compassion.
We're supposed to look the other way because she knows that George Bush is the real enemy.
We're supposed to look the other way because she knows the Tea Party's the real extremists.
We're supposed to look the other way because Barbara Boxer knows that it's conservatives who pose the greatest threat to this country.
We're supposed to look the other way because Christine O'Donnell is stupid.
We're supposed to look the other way because Barbara Boxer knows that Sharon Angle is an extremist tool of the special interests.
We're supposed to look the other way when we are confronted.
Look, and if stupid and dumbness is too strong for you, what would you describe these two sound bites as being?
Clueless.
Clueless, uninformed, wrong.
She doesn't know what she's talking about.
We're supposed to look the other way, though, because she cares about people.
She's a liberal, she's a good person.
I don't think she I don't think she's lying.
I don't know if she knows what she's talking about.
I really don't.
Glittering jewel of colossal ignorance.
IQ would fit in a thimble, but we're supposed to look the other way.
Because she cares about people.
I guess politicians can be excused for thinking some people are stupid because.
I mean, they keep being re-elected.
If you were Barbara Boxer and you kept being re-elected in California, you would have to think half the state is stupid.
But then you wouldn't be smart enough to think that.
Because you're Barbara Boxer.
Anyway, have a good weekend.
You could be Harry Reed, you could be really bad.
See you Monday, folks.
▲
Export Selection