All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 15, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:55
October 15, 2010, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24 7 Podcast.
Today is Friday.
It's also an anniversary of sorts.
And speaking of sorts, I'm out of sorts.
I'm warning you.
I'm in a foul mood today.
Anyway, it's sort of an anniversary.
18 years ago.
It ain't good.
It's funny.
You'll remember it.
But it ain't good.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
And we're back for open line Friday at 800 282-2882.
Email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
When we go to the phones, there are very few restrictions on the callers.
Mostly pretty much whatever you want to talk about's fair game, your chance to show everybody how a talk show should actually be run.
Go for it.
800-282-2882.
We had a debate last night, Dingy Harry against Sharon Angle.
Folks, I gotta tell you something here.
I even uh the Washington Post, somebody calling this a tie, if it was a tie, then uh then the floor was mopped with Harry Reed.
She really did mop the floor with Harry Reed.
I'm gonna tell you something.
Number two, maybe number three most powerful Democrat in Washington.
Harry Reed has presided and helped her preside over the worst economy since the Great Depression.
He has presided over a runaway deficit, the beginning of the end of private health insurance, the beginning of the end of private health care.
We just had the new deficit numbers come out.
It's gonna be busting the north side of uh a trillion dollars again, which we all knew.
Dingy Harry said the surge in Iraq was a failure.
And this war is lost.
If Harry Reed, a lifer in government, a lifer at the top of the Democrat Party, if Harry Reed practically from Jurassic Park in politics, if he cannot verbally trounce Sharon Angle in a debate, if he cannot make a convincing case as to how his and Pelosi's and Obama's agenda has made us better off than we were two, four or six years ago, there's absolutely no reason to re-elect him.
And there is no Democrat running for office today who can tell us that the last when did they assume the chart?
200 2008.
When do 2007, 2007 2007 is when Pelosi and the boys, so five years, right?
2006 midterms, five years.
Five years they have they can't run on one single thing they've done.
Not just in the 1820 months of uh of Obama, but since 2007, they have been in charge of the purse strings.
They've been running the show, them and their media buddies.
If they can't tell us they can't brag about their achievements, if they have to run from their achievements, if they had to hide from them.
There's absolutely no reason to re-elect Reed or any of them.
None.
Zilch Zero.
Now this debate last night should have been a mismatch.
Nothing against Sharon Angle.
Was she not a professional by design?
Harry Reed's got all the aid, he's got all the money, he's got all the marketing assistance, he's got all the political packages, he's got all the help.
Compared to the professional politician that is Dingy Harry on paper, undisputed heavyweight champion of the world, angle is a featherweight climbing into the political ring for the first time.
And the reality is is that she knocked Harry Reed out cold in the arena of ideas.
It wasn't even a fair fight, and this is happening throughout Christine O'Donnell ditto in Delaware.
I don't care what anybody says.
The women of the Republican Party.
They are fed up.
You know, these women in the Tea Party, they're fed up with the way this whole system is going and the way the whole system has been run.
She asked Dingy Harry a question.
We're going to get to these sound bites.
How do you get so rich?
How did this happen?
You go to Washington with nothing.
And how do you end up so rich?
And Dingy Harris, oh, I was a lawyer, and I've I've lived on a fixed income because I've invested wisely.
He has to live on a fixed income.
This is Dingy Harry tugging at our heartstrings.
Never mind, he gets to vote whenever he wants to on how high that fixed income is.
And he never did answer the question how do you get so rich?
The most powerful legislator in the land, Harry Reed, called an unemployed grandmother, a tool of the special interests.
Now, how in the name of Sam Hill, and there was a Sam Hill.
Can anybody make that charge with any credibility whatsoever?
She is essentially an unemployed grandmother.
She's just us.
She is us.
She is a tool of the special interest.
Yeah, I guess she's a puppet of her grandchildren.
Makes her probably anti broccoli because the kids, the special interests in her life, don't like broccoli.
I mean, what are we talking about here?
The ruling class, the political elite, the machine, is being undressed before our very eyes when we have a Tea Party candidate going up against an established ruling class machine politician.
And it's uh it actually is it it's it's nice to see.
Now you notice that nobody called Dingy Harry the W word.
Nobody called him a whore in a state where it's legal.
Nobody called him a whore.
She could have gotten away with it because they are in a state where it is legal.
And judging from Harry Reed's career, whoring seems to be expected.
And yet the word didn't come up.
But the national president of the Nags, we had this yesterday, the national president of the Nags went out there and said that somebody in the Jerry Brown campaign ought to be canned for using the word whore.
Turns out it was Brown's wife, but the California chapter president of the Nags has approved of calling Meg Whitman a political whore.
as he is, according to the California chapter of the NAGS president, She's a whore.
Reminds me of a bumper sticker.
You may have seen this one too.
She's not a woman, she's a Republican.
Vote Obama.
Have you seen that bumper sticker?
It's out there.
It's out there in California.
She's not a woman, she's a Republican.
The nags are putting that.
She's not a woman, she's a Republican.
Vote.
Obama.
Vote Brown, what have you?
At any rate.
18 years ago.
Exact date.
October 15th, 1992, Richmond, Virginia.
It was during the second presidential debate.
A question from an unidentified audience member.
This was a debate between George H.W. Bush, the incumbent, Bill Clinton was there, and uh Ross Perot.
The guy who at the time we affectionately said looked like a hand grenade with a bad haircut.
And here came the question that some could say caused a pivot to take place and a codification of exactly why the Democrat Party exists and how it sees itself.
The focus of my work is uh domestic mediator is meeting the needs of the children that I work with by way of their parents and not the wants of their parents.
And I asked the three of you, how can we, as symbolically the children of the future President, expect the two of you, the three of you to meet our needs.
The ponytail guy, Richmond, Virginia, 1992.
How?
How can we, as symbolically the children of the future president, expect the two of you, the three of you to meet our needs?
And Clinton was right in there with an answer.
Now you contrast that.
The president himself today, Barack Obama, went to uh uh town hall with the kids, MTV, B.E.T. generation kids.
And I frankly think, even though the questions sound hard hitting, I think a lot of them were set ups.
I really do.
But the point is, Obama still, whether he wanted to be asked these questions or whether they were genuine, still answering young people say, why should we re-elect you?
Our economy not doing well, but the reason I think they were softball setups is because of the way Obama dealt with them.
Obama got to stay on message with those questions.
Why I think some of it was a little bit set up.
You see what you think we play, some of the sound bites uh come in.
There was a casting call for it.
There's no question was a casting call.
Professional actors went out for that town hall.
So I think the whole thing was rigged, and I think these so-called tough questions were put to Obama so that he could say what he wanted to say.
There was an ad backstage, did an ad.
A veritable casting call in West Virginia.
There's a new poll so that uh showing that Joe Manchin is up 10 points over John Racy, and it's B.S. Marshall University has unveiled a poll that shows Governor Joe Manchin up 48 to 38 in his Senate race against Republican John Racy, 450 likely voters, the uh margin of error plus or minus 4.6 percent.
This is um this is big time BS.
The poll was conducted by Orion Strategies, owned by Curtis Wilkerson, the campaign manager for Democrat House candidate Mike Olivario, and they're they're they're they're they're putting these ad out to try to raise the spirits of West Virginia Democrats, and they're gonna flood the state with this poll.
It's nowhere near 10%.
I'm I'm sure the Paul shows it it is, don't misunderstand.
They can ask a question, they can sample in such a way get 10%.
Yeah, you just go sample 40% Democrats, 20% uh Republicans, 39% independents, or whatever.
You can do it any which way you want, ask the question.
Uh Rasmussen has it nowhere near this.
Uh 10 points is designed, another glaring, shining example of polling data being used to shape opinion rather than reflect it.
Open line Friday.
We take a timeout, we come back, we'll get started with the audio sound bites from Dingy Harry and Sharon Angle last night in Nevada after this.
Even in the new republic, a liberal journal of opinion propaganda.
Story by T.A. Frank, uh, who works for Washington Monthly, read my lips the headline last night, was a disaster.
Now, the point of this piece is that Dingy Harry allowed Sharon Angle to look reasonable enough to the author to this Democrat and gave incoherent answers on his own behalf.
Imagine that.
Imagine that.
A writer for Washington Monthly of the New Republic said Reed screwed up because he allowed Sharon Angle to look reasonable enough.
The Democrats cannot win diddly squat this election.
The only thing that they're having any success at, and this is with the aid and assistance of the state-controlled media.
And that is to make some Republicans look like kooks.
Nutcases.
This is how they're attempting to portray everybody in the Tea Party movement.
Carl Pelladino, Christine O'Donnell, Sharon Angle.
She's us.
The kook is Harry Reed.
The oddball is Harry Reed.
The extremist is Harry Reed.
The guy destroying the country and the private sector along with Obama is Harry Reed.
Sharon Angle never did anything to anybody.
Harry Reed is not reasonable.
Anyone who would support policies and vote for them as Harry Reid has is unreasonable.
Is profoundly extremist, spending money the country doesn't have, printing money the country doesn't have.
In placing future generations in debt they'll never be able to get out of.
Destroying, essentially the generation of wealth and the way it happens in this country, confiscating it, redistribute.
Harry Reed.
I mean, let's be honest.
Let's say who's extreme here.
Who's odd?
I've always thought Harry Rean's a little bit of an oddball of me, and he He screwed up last night because he allowed Sharon Angle to look reasonable.
Of course, the presumption going in is that she's not reasonable.
Why is she not reasonable?
Because she's not a member of the ruling class.
Because she's not a member of the professional political ranks.
Can you imagine somebody on our side writing a story?
You know, I didn't like what Sharon Angle did.
She she let Harry Reed seem reasonable.
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
Last night in Las Vegas, Dingy Harry and Sharon Angle.
Dingy Harry said this about insurance companies in health care reform.
Insurance companies don't do things out of the goodness of their hearts.
They do it out of a profit motive, and they have almost destroyed our economy.
We need them to be forced to do mammograms.
That's why you see breast cancer awareness month.
You see the baseball players wearing pink shoes, and you see the football players having pink uh helmets.
You detect it if you do mammograms.
Colonoscopies.
If you do colonoscopies, colon cancer does not come because you snip off the things they find when they go up and no more.
And we need to have insurance do this.
It'll save money in the long run to do this.
Profound incoherence.
You hear him describe a colonoscopy here.
Well, colonoscopies, if you do colonoscopies, colon cancer doesn't come because you snip off the things they find when they go up and no more.
This is the reasonable intelligence of Harry Reed.
Insurance companies have destroyed our economy, and they say Sharon Engel is the kook.
Insurance companies do not do things out of the goodness of their hearts.
They do it all for the profit motive, and they've almost destroyed our country.
Right.
Who is it that's targeting insurance companies?
In fact, the entire industry.
You just heard it.
It's Harry Reid, the Democrat Party.
Anything in the private sector that often and the U.S. health care system insurance system is among the best in the world, and these people have set out to destroy it.
In fact, they have.
And by the way, dingy Harry, I don't know what the hell you're looking at, but so far there has not been one pink helmet during the month of October in the National Football League.
And I don't think anybody in the NCAA is wearing pink helmets.
This is Harry Reid.
It's just...
Just unbelievable.
An absolute idiot.
Women, I'll tell you, you know, in general, there's something going on.
There's something in the air.
Women in general, regardless of politics, are sick and tired of all this, wimpy.
Old men running the show of late, running it everywhere but in in the in the good directions.
Positive action is not being seen, running the country into the ground.
They're fed up with it.
And Harry Reed has been the forefront.
Here is Sharon Angle during a back and forth on Social Security.
Man up, Harry Reed.
You need to understand that we have a problem with Social Security.
That problem was created because of government taking that money out of the Social Security Trust Fund.
What we need to do is keep our promises to our senior citizens by putting the money back in the trust fund and going forward allowing our workers to have the option of a personalized Social Security plan that becomes an asset to them, just like your thrift savings plan is an asset to you.
If it's good enough for you, it should be good enough for the rest of us.
And Dingy Harry had his response standing by.
Mitch, these ideas of my opponent are really extreme.
I said CBO, the actual said there's plenty of money in that trust fund account.
During the Clinton years, we did not use the trust fund monies to offset the deficit.
We were strengthening Social Security by not using it to offset the deficit.
Her facts are absolutely wrong.
Mitch, these ideas of my opponent are really extreme.
The extreme ideas are coming from the White House and the Democrat Party, and they're clearly not pro-American ideas.
Not in the general sense as they're understood.
And if for anybody to try to tell us that Social Security is in good shape, there's nothing in good shape.
There's nothing that's showing a positive on the balance sheet.
There's nothing in the black.
There is no trust fund.
The Social Security, whatever it is, budget has been used to offset budget deficits for decades.
It is Harry Reid who is extreme and is a stranger to the truth throughout that debate last night.
I want to go back and I want to play this most recent Excoriation of insurance companies by Harry Reed one more time and rebut this thing fully.
Insurance companies don't do things out of the goodness of their hearts.
They do it out of a profit motive, and they have almost destroyed our economy.
We need them to be forced to do mammograms.
That's why you see breast cancer awareness month.
You see the baseball players wearing pink shoes, and you see the football players having pink uh helmets.
You detect it if you do mammograms, colonoscopies.
If you do colonoscopies, colon cancer does not come because you snip off the things they find when they go up, and no more.
And we need to have have the insurance companies do this.
It'll save money in the long run to do this.
Now, that's dingy Harry on insurance companies.
Here he is on social security.
One more time.
Mitch, these ideas of my opponent are really extreme.
I said CBO, the actual said there's plenty of money in that trust fund account.
During the Clinton years, we did not use the trust fund monies to offset the deficit.
We were strengthening Social Security by not using it to offset the deficit.
Her facts are absolutely wrong.
All that's talking points.
All of that is gobbledygook.
All of that is lies.
In the first place, insurance companies have the lowest profit margin of just about any industry.
And they're on the brink of being put out of business by people like Harry Reed.
As is almost every other industry.
The oil industry is a target of people like Harry Reed corporations.
Evil corporations.
Anything that's in the private sector that turns a profit by definition in these people's perverted world is evil.
And they say that Sharon Angle is the kook.
Now they just announced back in May that Social Security is going to be in the red this year.
Six years earlier than thought.
And in the red means Social Security is going to be paying out more than it takes in for the first time in history.
And that is all from the same congressional budget office that Dingy Harry was just citing as the source of all of his lies.
And if you want, I can give you the link for the New York Times for these details.
Social Security to see payout exceed pay-in this year.
I We're all these so-called fact-checkers in the media.
I haven't seen one fact check on this debate.
I haven't seen one fact check of anything that Harry Reed happened to say.
Let's move on now to Sharon Angle, accusing Dingy Harry of saying this war is lost.
The moderator, Vegas PBS's Mitch Fox, says you're quoted as saying the following the war is lost.
The surge is not accomplishing anything as indicated by this extreme violence, end quote.
Do you believe that your statement demoralized the troops and were inaccurate as judged by the success of the troop surge?
The statement that I made was made following General Petraeus saying the war cannot be won militarily.
He said, and I said, the war could only be won militarily, economically, and diplomatically.
That's why after I made my statement, and General Petraeus made his statements, We did the surge then, not later.
And it was the right thing to do.
General Petraeus has done a good job.
He's my friend.
Once again, chalked full of lies.
Harry Reed, this war is lost, the dirty little secret.
And it's not even a secret any longer.
The fact of the matter is that Harry Reid and the Democrat Party were trying to secure defeat in Iraq for two years.
They wanted, they wanted to saddle George W. Bush and the Republican Party with defeat.
They sought it.
They were demoralizing the U.S., the military, on purpose.
It was the first time in my life that a political party had sided against the United States in a military conflict.
All for the purpose of political advancement.
Now he can try to revise history all he wants.
He can try to lie through his teeth, but we all remember.
He did say this war is lost.
He was not polite to General Petraeus.
He led the movement in the Democrat Party in the Senate to try to make sure that public support for the war in Iraq crumbled.
Not only that, Dingy Harry and his cronies were trying to convince you we were in a recession when employment, unemployment was a mere 4.7%.
In the midst of a boom roaring economy.
Harry Reid, the Democrat Party wanted you to believe that we were in a recession, that the Bush tax cuts had caused all kinds of economic stagnation and misery.
Here's the totality of what Dingy Harry said.
I believe myself that the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, you have to make your own decision as to what the president knows.
This war is lost.
This war is lost, and the surge is not accomplishing anything, as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq yesterday.
And so Dingy Harry, well, the statement I made was following General Petraeus saying the war can't be won militarily.
He said, and I said the war can only be won militarily, economically, diplomatically.
So he's trying to twist this around to say he was the one who uh ended up advising Petraeus on how to win this.
And they call Sharon Angle the kook.
You know, in common ordinary parlance, the way normal people talk, Harry Reed's a liar.
And it's no more complicated than that.
He's a shameless little man.
He's a liar.
I have my own personal experiences with him to document it.
The phony soldier routine.
There's no question in my mind.
And anybody else who's reasonable, who poses a tremendous threat to this country's future in terms of recovering from this economic disaster.
And with people like Harry Reed in the Senate in charge of the Democrat Party, progress will be retarded and stagnant, and perhaps never take place by design.
Now, Harry Sharon Angle, listening to Harry Reid go on and on about how he finally ended up working with Petraeus.
He and Petraeus, his good friend, by the way, came up with a plan.
Sharon Angle said.
We need to support our military with all of our resources, not only our military in service right now, but those veterans and their families as well.
When you said this war is lost and said that General Petraeus was dishonest, that emboldened our enemies, demoralized our troops, and endangered them, and you need to apologize to them, Senator.
Right on, right on, right on.
No nonsense.
And here's what Dingy Harry said in reply.
I've been endorsed by the largest military organization in the country, the veterans of foreign wars.
My opponent, listen to this idea.
She wants to privatize the veterans administration.
Think about that.
Privatize the veterans, Mr. I worked hard.
I appreciate the work of our military.
We'll continue to work with them the rest of my political career.
What is what is what is wrong with privatizing the VA?
What's wrong with privatizing the post?
Somebody tell me where it's working.
Somebody tell me where anything the federal government's work at running is working.
It's like Christine O'Donnell the other day.
What in the world is wrong with local school boards determining curriculum?
What's wrong with this?
What is extreme about it?
He sits here and he says, This is this idea.
She wants to privatize the VA.
Think about that.
Yeah, we ought to think about that.
Privatize the Veterans Administration.
You're not doing a damn good job in charge of it, Harry.
Nothing you're in charge of is working well except for you.
And we can't even say that what you're in charge of for you is working well.
You're about to get shlacked.
Here is a guy running and voting and governing against the will of the American people, and he calls her extreme.
I think I think Harry Reed loved General Petraeus so much.
Didn't he refuse to denounce the move on ad?
I'm not sure.
We'd have to look that up.
But I never got the impression that Harry Reid and Petraeus were friends.
When did that happen?
When's the last time they got together for barbecue?
Has Harry Reed heard the news from Europe.
They are privatizing everything that they can in Europe because Harry Reed's way is leading to destruction.
Everything's imploding.
Imagine that.
And then there was this.
Sharon Engel wanted to know from Dingy Harry how he got so wealthy on a government payroll.
The tax cuts need to be made permanent.
If they're not, we will experience the largest tax increase in the history of America.
And with voting for over 300 tax increases, Senator, we can't trust you with our taxes.
Not only that, you came from searchlight to the Senate with very little.
Now you're one of the richest men in the U.S. Senate.
On behalf of Nevada taxpayers, I'd like to know.
We'd like to know.
How did you become so wealthy on a government payroll?
Right on, right on, right on.
Everybody would like to have this question answered because we know.
We know what the answer is.
Kickbacks, bribes, schemes, payoffs, insider deals.
We all know what happens with these people.
And she's right.
Shows up from Searchlight in Nevada.
Now he's a land baron.
Land in California, land in Nevada.
We've the LA Times has run expose stories on the, well, shall I say the curious arrangement of an outcome of some of Dingy Harry's deals.
That's just coincidence.
Here is, you want to hear a flailing answer.
Question is how did you become so wealthy on a government payroll?
That's really a kind of a low blow.
I think most everyone knows.
I was a very successful lawyer.
I didn't.
I did a very good job in investing.
I have been on a fixed income since I went to Washington.
What is I lived off of what I made in the private sector?
I put my five kids through a hundred semesters of school and I paid for every penny of it.
So her suggestion that I made money being a senator is simply false.
And I'm really disappointed that she would suggest that.
I will further say, if she wants the tax cuts made permanent for everybody, we have a deficit problem to worry about also.
Had to get that talking point in.
Had to get that talking point that tax cuts lead to deficits.
And I was right, Dingy Harry refused to vote to condemn the Petraeus ad.
He refused to vote for it.
He refused to vote to condemn an ad, pummeling his good friend, General Petraeus.
I think most everybody knows I was a very successful lawyer.
I didn't know that, but that alone tells us something.
I did a very good job at investing.
Yeah, I'm reminded of Hillary Clinton turning a thousand dollars into a hundred thousand dollars in cattle futures with the help of Robert Red Bone in Arkansas.
Remember that?
She said, Yeah, I read the Wall Street Journal.
That's where I learned about trading cattle futures.
I was a very successful lawyer.
I did a very good job at investing.
I have been on a fixed income since I went to Washington.
What does he want us to believe with that?
What he wants us to believe is his investment somewhere in a blind trust, and he's living off whatever they produce, and it's fixed.
Fixed income.
Maybe he has tax-free municipal bonds, fixed income.
But he's also paid a Senate salary.
That's not a fixed income.
Well, I wouldn't call it a fixed.
Maybe he does.
But it it isn't fixed.
It has seen increases.
He's got all kinds of perks as a United States Senator as well.
I put my five kids through a hundred semesters of school.
I paid for every penny of it.
Suggestion I made money being a senator is simply false.
And yet we got Barney Frank running around as, yeah, I flew around in private.
What's wrong with having which friends?
What's wrong with that?
What's wrong with having which guys?
What's wrong with it?
Uh up until now, rich guys have been criminals.
Now when you have one as a friend, what's wrong with it?
They got a plane, I'm gonna print a plane, I'll go to Virginia Islands, a place of violence, why not go to Virgin Islands?
What's wrong with having rich friends?
Harry Reed, I don't have any rich friends.
I'm gonna fix income.
I'm barely getting by my five slub kids.
I went broke, putting them through school.
And Sharon Angle is the cook and is the extremist.
Harry Reed has been in politics since 1966.
I'm gonna try to find out between now and the start of the next hour.
I'm gonna be busy here.
While you all are enjoying messages from our fine sponsors, I'm gonna be finding out just when the hell it was that Harry Reed was a good lawyer.
I'm I'm gonna look that up.
He's been in politics since 1966.
I'm gonna find out when he had the time to be a good lawyer and where he was when he was a good lawyer, and how much he was paid when he was a good lawyer.
And my my my guess is I'll reserve my guess.
And I'll I'll save it for the facts.
But in the meantime, while dingy Harry is calling Sharon Angle a kook and a freak and extremist.
May 1st, 2010, Wall Street Journal, July 7th, 2010, uh the Washington Examiner.
Two stories on big pharma funneling piles of money in the Harry Reid's Nevada campaign.
No word of big insurance, funneling big money into Harry Reed's campaign, but big drug is and did.
From the Hill.com, June 29th of this year.
General Petraeus nomination to run the show in Afghanistan puts some Democrats in an awkward spot.
Why?
Because Reed called Petraeus a liar when he said the surge was working.
He said that Harry Reed did Harry Reed said, Petraeus, we're not good friends.
We worked together to come up with a strategy that would work.
Harry Reed, and I got the story right here, told CNN, April of 2007, he didn't believe Petraeus' claim the surge is working in Iraq.
I don't believe him because it's not happening.
All you have to do is look at the facts.
This war is lost.
Harry Reed is a liar.
He's a small man like Obama liar through his teeth in a debate and he should have mopped the floor with last night.
Because he's up against a rank political amateur.
And he got his clock cleaned.
It was about time.
Who's uh who's uh who's worthless see?
Uh I don't think we can get that call in in less than a minute.
In fact, as I'm looking at the roster of calls, is there anybody up there sternly it's only worth 30 seconds?
Nothing quick up there?
There's not one person who's only worth 30 seconds.
Well, too bad.
Well, I could probably make it work in only 30 seconds, but I won't put it to the test.
We come back, folks, to the next hour.
I'm gonna do the research.
I'm gonna find out just when the hell he was a lawyer.
I'm gonna find sixty-six, I was doing uh I was running the board at a radio station in Cape Girarde in preparation for going to Texas to an electronic school uh to get my first class radio license to get on the air in 1967.
And I was also two a day's practices of the high school football team in August.
That's what I was doing in 1966.
And Harry Reed was already in politics in 1966.
I was 15 years old, but I'm gonna find out when the hell he was a good lawyer.
I'm gonna find out what he did as a good lawyer.
And he said, people must remember I was a good lawyer.
Must mean he was paid a lot of money.
I'm gonna find out how much.
So he's been in politics, he'd been living off of whatever he invested ever, making money as a lawyer since 1966.
It has to be huge, folks.
It has to be huge.
All right, here's a little preliminary research.
Dingy Harry graduated George Washington University Law School with a JD while working for the U.S. Capitol Police.
Returned to Nevada after law school, served as Henderson City Attorney before being elected to the Nevada Assembly in 68.
Uh he was never in private practice.
I don't think I'm this is preliminary.
▲
Export Selection