All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 29, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:30
September 29, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yeah, we're back.
It's great to have you here, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network.
Here we are on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
If it's worth knowing about, you'll know about it here first.
If we don't know about it, it isn't worth you knowing about it.
Telephone number 800-282-288 to the email address.
Lrushball at EIBNet.com.
Here we go.
Meg Whitman's former housekeeper plans to file a claim against the Republican gubernatorial candidate.
A woman's attorney, Gloria Allred, says it'll be controversial and explosive.
Meg Whitman's housekeeper for nine years will tell how she suffered as a longtime Latina household employee in Meg Whitman's home for nine years.
Nine years.
And why she's filing a claim against Ms. Whitman, Glory Allred said in a statement, details of a case expected to be released at 2 p.m. news conference.
Maybe it's happening now.
Now, let's recall, ladies and gentlemen, that Gloria Allred also filed a sexual assault suit.
I think it was on behalf of some stunt woman against Arnold Shriver.
Schwarzenegger, Schwarzenegger, when he was running for governor in 2003, and I think it was right at the end of the campaign, and the whole thing ended up being dismissed.
And in fact, you remember when a guy who did documentaries brought up that uh Arnold Schriver.
Uh uh Schwarzenegger, sorry, had made Nazi-like comments just a couple days before the election.
And it turns out that that guy, who um, the documentarian who made these comments about Arnold named George Butler, turned out to be a lifelong pal of John Carey's, who had served in Vietnam.
And George Butler had even helped Kerry write his first book, The Winter Soldier.
George Butler had written a book proposal that claimed Arnold had been an admirer of Adolf Hitler.
You remember this?
And this was right before one of those uh gubernatorial races.
And I don't know if uh Alred was involved in that, but she was involved in one of these other things right before.
Right before the elections.
So we'll uh we'll wait to see how that uh how that all shakes out.
Uh New Blank Panther.
Uh, this is uh King Shamir Shabbaz, back on August 9th in Harlem.
Had some things to say, among them this.
This is what King Someir in the Philadelphia chapter, along with the guidance and leadership of attorney Malik Shabbats has been doing that you don't hear about from Fox Jews.
I'm sorry, Fox!
Most of the media blood suckers, lies and crucifix Jews.
We're gonna talk about me killing white babies.
Let's talk about the little black babies that you use as alligator baits.
That is King Shamir Shabbat uh uh Shamir Shabbaz, uh the man who Eric Holder and Obama let off the hook involved in voter intimidation in Philadelphia.
This is the same organization, the new Black Panther Party that met with Mahmoud Ahmadini's odd and Calypso Louie in New York at the United Nations land.
Well, not at the United Nations, but Mahmoud Ahmedini's I was in town for the U.N., so he met with the new Black Panthers.
And Minister Farrakhan.
This is September 2009 in Philadelphia during a street festival.
New Black Panther Party chapter leader King Shamir Shabazz.
I hate white people.
All of them.
Every last iota of a cracker, I hate it.
You want freedom?
You're gonna have to kill some crackers.
You're gonna have to kill some of these babies.
Right.
Uh, this is um again the man who was there's no case there, Holder said, and his civil rights division at the uh Justice Department.
A wide swath of U.S. business uh leaders Tuesday reported the economy has slowed significantly in the last few months.
They said the tax stalemate in Washington, a major reason that flagging consumer sentiment is now endangering the recovery.
And separate reports, big business members of the business round table, along with manufacturers, home builders, and the Oil industry gave gloomy assessments of the recovery, said Congress decision to postpone action on tax cuts till after the election was weighing heavily on consumer sediment.
Verizon chief executive Ivan Seidenberg, who's a big Obama supporter back when business fundamentals are reasonably strong with low interest rates.
Most businesses holding adequate capital to expand, but a lack of demand and inadequate demand by consumers was leading businesses to hold back on expansion and hiring new words.
You were Chris Matthews said the other day.
Chris Matthews said that the reason businesses are sitting on all this cash is to artificially depress the economy so as to hurt Obama.
I know he's an idiot, but that's what he said.
He said that businesses are purposely sitting on all this money so as to harm the economy.
To make sure that Obama doesn't do well.
Oh.
And nearly nine months after the earthquake, more than a million Haitians still live on the streets between piles of rubble.
One reason.
Not a cent of the 1.15 billion dollars the U.S. promised for rebuilding has arrived.
This story is not from a conservative news site.
This story is from state-controlled associated press.
The money was pledged by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Rodham in March for use this year in rebuilding.
The U.S. has already spent more than 1.1 billion on post-quake relief, but without long-term funds, the reconstruction of the wrecked capital cannot begin.
With just a week to go before fiscal 2010 ends, the money is still tied up in Washington.
At fault, bureaucracy, disorganization, and a lack of urgency.
The AP learned in interviews with officials in the State Department, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the White House, and the U.N. Office of the Special Envoy.
One senator has held up a key authorization bill because of a five million dollar provision he says will be wasteful.
Meanwhile, deaths in Port-Prince are mounting as Quake survivors scrambled.
Now remember it's Obama who was deeply moved by Reverend Wright, who said that cruise ships throw away more food in a day than Port-a-Prince sees in a year.
Now, how does anybody think that this same regime can deliver health care to Americans?
One point one five billion dollars pledged U.S. aid still has not arrived in Haiti.
Obama said he wasn't going to forget the Haitians.
And Bill Clinton said he wasn't going to forget the Haitians.
Bill Clinton went to Haiti a bunch of times.
Remember that?
Clinton went down there to Haiti.
Mrs. Clinton went down there to Haiti.
Why is Obama campaigning instead of doing his job?
Why's Clinton campaigning instead of doing his UN job?
Clinton's a special envoy.
Bill Clinton is the special envoy.
Where's Clinton?
Haiti is suffering.
Hurting out there.
You have the world in need and the first two black presidents in this country are nowhere to be found helping the black residents of Port au Prince.
Too busy campaigning.
From World Net Daily, a new poll released this week soundly contradicts critics' claims that Tea Party movement is fringe, white, and racist.
PJ TV's Tea Party tracking poll has monitored nationwide sediments toward the Tea Party on a weekly basis since August the second.
The poll's most recent reports reveal the following results.
A number of people who identify as members of the Tea Party has more than tripled over the last month alone, up to 21% of likely voters.
And how when is this happened?
This has happened during focused criticism of the event.
Focused criticism of the Tea Party.
The attempts to ridicule impugn and demolish it, and it's growing.
Fifty-five percent of those surveys said they support the Tea Parties based on the movement's positions on issues.
And among the likely voters who are black, 32% said they would vote for a candidate backed by the Tea Party.
One-third of blacks support the Tea Party movement.
You might be able to say the wheels of the race card bus are beginning to fall off.
But we all know these are probably not real blacks.
Not authentic.
Authentic blacks would not support the Tea Parties.
Uh authentic blacks, inauthentic blacks, like Justice Thomas, Condoleezza Rice, Thomas Saul, Walter Williams, uh Alan West, J.C. Watts, uh Michael Steele, those are not authentic blacks.
This is interesting.
This is from uh Rasmussen.
Republicans, much more likely than Democrats to consider voting for an independent this year.
A new Rasmussen Reports National Telephone Survey finds that one out of three likely U.S. voters say that they are more likely to vote for an independent candidate in this election than they have been in the past.
The identical number say they are less likely to do so this year.
But Republicans are in a more rebellious mood than Democrats.
Thirty-seven percent of Republican voters say that they are more likely to vote for an independent candidate this November compared to the 17% of Democrats.
Well, I find that kind of interesting since we had um the call with the independent woman yesterday.
Gail from from Birmingham, she really I mean, she was an independent, but she really was uh a disaffected conservative fed up with the Republican Party.
And here it is, Wall Street Journal of Tea Party has emerged as a potent force in American politics, a center of gravity within the Republican Party, but a large majority of Republicans showing an affinity for the movement that has repeatedly bucked the GOP leadership this year.
A new Wall Street Journal NBC News poll has found that 71% of Republicans describe themselves as Tea Party supporters.
You and I say, given the given the trashing that the drive-bys and the Democrats, the lies that have been told about the Tea Party, that they're racist, sexist bigots, idiots, dupes.
The movement continues to gather strength despite the criticism, which means that it's issue-oriented.
I gotta get some photocalls in it we'll do that when we come back from this obscene profit timeout of the EIB network.
All right, here's what we have, at least on this uh Meg Whitman stuff.
Gloria all red claiming that Meg Whitman's a hypocrite for having hired an undocumented worker.
This would be the Latina Maid, and she fired her before deciding to run for office.
The allegation as presented by all red doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
Why not keep her on the payroll and help her get legalized if you want to keep her quiet?
Um why would you fire somebody who you know could turn around and cause your campaign so much damage?
At the end of the all-red press conference, uh one of my spies watching it says you can hear the reporters saying breathlessly, wow.
I don't know what that means.
I don't know if they're saying, wow, it's a big deal or wow, it's a whole Hummer.
I wonder if Gloria Allred is going to represent the uh undocumented workers at Colin Powell's house, because he said they're all over the place.
And he said they're all over our house and your house.
They're undocumented, they're everywhere.
The reporters were saying, wow, it's a big deal.
I think the reporters think that Meg Whitman canning the Latina made before she seeks office a big deal.
So they think they've uh they're on to something.
Macoma, Ohio.
This is Billy.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Yes, sir.
Uh I have a bone nick with you, Rush.
You're in my top ten most admired people, but uh uh I don't understand what you have a problem with with Darwin.
You know, uh it seems to me the science is pretty sound on this.
And uh I would agree with you totally on other sciences like uh uh global warming, social media.
Well, I should I know I should have thrown Marx in there too, along with Freud.
Well, I'm not a Marxist.
I mean, uh Ayn Rand is probably my number one most admired people, but uh, I consider the science pretty sound.
I mean, the n the DNA is 98% the same as uh uh as uh the Great Aights.
and as far as O'Donnell's comment is concerned, I you know, I hope she wins and all that, but uh I think she misunderstands that human beings and uh the great apes share a common ancestor.
They didn't evolve from apes, they share the same common ancestors, sort of like a tree branching off.
Yeah.
Yeah, so uh I I don't, you know, uh as far as Darwin is concerned, I know a lot of people, a lot of Republicans are Christian and all that, and way and although I may agree with them on a lot of different issues, uh I think they're way off on this, and I think the you know it I don't understand it.
Well, the only thing that uh some people have with Darwin is that they believe evolution cannot explain creation.
I happen to agree with that.
I don't think evolution can explain creation.
I mean something something had to evolve from something.
Where does something come from?
It didn't evolve from nothing.
Something to put it there.
It had to it had to be created.
Darwin tries to argue against uh uh creation and and it g and it gives the anti-creationist ammo, Darwin does, and I think it actually limits inquiry and curiosity contrary to promoting it.
Well, but why would you uh uh disparage a certain uh uh certain theory just because you can't explain something else?
I mean uh uh you know I you know there's Darwin can't prove his either.
Uh I think there is solid evidence in favor of uh Darwin.
Like I said, 98% DNA the same if you look at if you look at the fossils what big banged.
Right?
The mystic w what the big bang of what?
Well, I'm not a professional scientist, but I will say this that uh uh is just as far as evolution is concerned.
If you look at the bone structures of human beings versus the bone structures of apes, yeah.
And uh uh they're very similar.
Yeah, I know.
And uh and then on top of that, just as the theory of evolution as a whole, not just from apes.
If you look at how uh viruses or bacteria mutate, you know, how uh you wait a minute, you're misunderstanding here.
I'm not I don't I have never said I don't believe in evolution.
Clearly things evolve.
All I believe is that evolution does not explain creation.
And the evolution, the Darwinists use Darwin and whatever it is he believes to argue against the whole concept of creationism or intelligent design, which to me is intellectually vapid.
Well, I don't think I I don't think Darwin Darwinism necessarily says that there's uh I am an atheist, but I don't think a dar I don't think Darwin uh, you know, the the philosophy of evolution comes out and says that there is no God, you know.
Uh but I do think I don't know.
Darwin may not have, but the people that don't believe in God use Darwin as their evidence.
I mean, Darwin Darwin created a lot of um shall we get a lot of people a lot of insurance policies.
Well there's there I I see I don't understand this.
Just as there's no evolution uh evidence for socialism, there's no evidence for creation.
So why would you try to even bring creation up?
Wait a second.
There's no what do you mean there's no evidence for socialism?
Uh uh well, what I mean is there's no evidence it works, excuse me.
Oh, oh, I see, yeah.
But uh uh but it's it's the same thing.
So I don't understand when you know I agree with Republicans and conservatives when they say this stuff is been tried, socialism has been tried, but on the other hand, when uh uh you look at uh there's no evidence for uh the evidence of creation either.
It's all based on faith.
Where you have faith in socialism, you have faith in the No, no, no, socialism is not a matter of faith.
I mean it's if you believe in socialism, you're stupid.
There's evidence it doesn't work.
Of course, of course creation is but Darwinism is faith too.
That's my whole point.
You know, Darwinism is presented as absolute science, inarguable science, and it's faith as well.
It is science.
It is science, Rush.
There, I mean there are there's a lot of evidence.
Well, then I'm gonna say creationism is a science.
Intelligent design is a science.
What's you know, if what's w if if you say my faith isn't a science, I'm gonna say yours isn't.
Yeah, but there's actual false.
I mean, there's actual, there's actual bones when you look at it.
I'm not a professional science scientist.
I'm not sure.
No, no, you've made that clearer.
And I'm, you know, I'm not a professional uh creationist.
Okay.
I'm not I'm not a profess but I'm not a professional intelligent designer.
You know.
Okay.
Okay, well, I just I just totally disagree with you on that.
I just think it's a shame if if if if if we in apes have a if if if we we have a common ancestor, the apes got screwed.
Yeah, they did.
Wouldn't you rather be a human being than an ape?
Of course.
I mean, I like air conditioning, running water, toilets, and so forth.
I don't like to eat bananas all the time and terrorize people.
Yeah.
I'm glad I'm glad that I'm glad that my ancestors uh uh are human.
I wouldn't want to be an ape.
Yeah.
The only reason to be an ape is you might it's probably a better chance of meeting Naomi Watts uh than if if you're a human being, but even that's a long shot.
Right.
Okay, old Rushbo.
Uh we'll have to just agree to disagree on that one, but uh go share an angle.
Amen, bro.
I mean, look, we're not on different sides of this thing.
I'm I'm I you're I don't mean for you to take what I said personally.
I do think Darwin is has caused humanity a lot of grief, like Freud has caused humanity a lot of confusion, and like Marx has literally single-handedly been responsible for more murder than any organized criminal you could name.
We'll be back in just a mere moment, ladies and gentlemen.
More exciting phone calls on the other side of another obscene profit timeout here on the Rush Limbaugh program, back after this.
Now look, folks, as I've told you countless times, I live in Literalville, and this is one of the things I think that gets me it results in me being more misunderstood than anything else.
If you tell me something, I take it literally.
I believe that you mean it.
I I don't dance around edges and trying to figure out what you really meant.
You say it, I believe it.
I live in Literalville, and I'm just telling you that when it comes to evolution and creationism, they are both articles of faith.
Neither can be proved as a means of explaining how all this came to be.
Nobody is arguing that there is within species evolution cross-species evolution.
I mean, that all of this stuff is is is uh there's another objection that that some people have to evolution, and that is to some people it's it is a a tautology, survival of the fittest.
Meaning that what survives is the fittest.
It's always amazed me that liberals embrace this.
Liberals hate the survival of the fittest, do they not?
Liberals are uh are obsessed with the equality of outcome.
Liberals are they are there's they say they're animated and motivated with the fact that they can't stand the inequality of things.
It's not fair that somebody should be richer than somebody else.
It's not fair that somebody should have two houses and somebody else has only one.
Well, if they're gonna profess their belief in evolution, isn't it the case that the survival of the fittest must be allowed to um explain all of this?
In other words, that some people have more than others because they're more competent, they're more able, they're more fit.
And yet the same people want to tell us, oh yeah, you have to believe in the survival of the fittest.
That's that's why the weak members of the tribe end up being slaughtered.
That's why the weak lion goes away and gets creamed by the wildebeest, or whatever the hell happens.
You know, it vanishes into the belt.
In Rhodesia.
And uh I uh it's it's all just major premise, Darwin's major premise is the origin of the species.
Now, I, living in Littoralville, say, point me to a species we have seen originate.
I'm sorry, I live in Literalville.
Origin of the species.
Okay, I'm sorry, as much as people may love Darwin, he cannot explain the origin of the species.
And nor can I. Now back back to tautology.
How do you know it's the fittest?
Survival of the fittest.
Well, the only way you know that it's the fittest is that it survived.
It's just circular.
It really doesn't advance anything.
So I think all of this, you know, people find comfort and faith anywhere they can.
And some people are hellbent on not being religious.
It's an article of faith within.
I'm not going to be sucked in by some rebel.
I'm not gonna I'm not gonna surrender my mind to a bunch of baseless religion.
Some people have that attitude, but other people totally immerse themselves in it and be very comfortable having faith.
But Darwinism isn't science any more than creationism is.
Science, global warming is not science.
It's not been proved.
In the scientific method, another test of whether something is, I mean, you could.
I mean, I have to confirm this with my official climatologist, Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama Huntsville, but to me another test of whether something is science or not is if it's predictive.
Can you predict from your knowledge of the science?
Evolution is not predictable.
What has evolution ever predicted?
What can we know for certain is going to happen down the road because of evolution?
Just the other day, maybe yesterday, the day before, I had a story in a stack of stuff.
They found a hundred and fifty new species somewhere.
Didn't even know existed.
Well, okay, cool.
I thought we were destroying species, but that's beside the point.
Where did these come from?
Simply because we didn't know them, does that mean they weren't there?
Because we had not discovered these species, they weren't there.
I'm sorry, don't believe that.
Just because we didn't know it doesn't mean they weren't there before we found out about it.
Global warming has turned out to be not be predictive either, as we have seen over the last ten years.
If global warming were predictive, we'd have had a thousand hurricanes already this year, right?
Based on what they predicted after uh what Al Gore told us after after Katrina.
So I all of this stuff is really if you if you live in Literalville like I do, it's amazing how simple things are.
But if you want to live in Grayville, where there's no certitude, uh, you can get you can confuse yourself to the day you die, all the while convincing yourself you're brilliant.
Which is what I find amazing.
Some of the most confused people with no answers of anything are among our greatest thinkers.
Among our finest scholars.
And they're just running around in rampant confusion.
One day, Oat Bram is going to cure heart attacks.
The next day, all it's going to do is create more cellular fat in your butt.
They haven't the slightest idea.
Pure and simple.
Now that Meg Whitman's uh ex-housekeepers outed herself as illegal or that Gloria Allred did it, will she be deported.
The press thinks they're out of something big with this.
They think this is cool.
And the amazing thing is, in normal circumstances, the press would love Meg Whitman.
I mean, policy-wise, she's right in there, moderate.
Probably doesn't like the Tea Party much.
Right in there.
Anyway, the Red Cross says only about 7% of us are prepared for a disaster.
I would have to include Clinton and Obama in there.
I mean, look at look at Haiti.
Clinton's the envoy.
1.13 billion still hadn't gotten in there.
Now September, we're still in September for a couple more days.
National Preparedness Month.
Legal Zoom and the Red Cross are teaming up to help keep you safe.
You never know when an emergency is coming, particularly if you listen to the National Weather Service.
The Red Cross recommends storing emergency, essential items, like a first aid kit, blankets, emergency food and water.
The Red Cross also wants you to have an essential document to keep in your emergency kit.
Your family will, because in emergencies, this document makes your wishes known.
Is your will or living trust up to date?
You have a copy of it in your emergency kit.
Well, if you don't, it's really simple.
You should do it now at LegalZoom.
Person sent me a note the other day.
Hey, Biden, I just did my will at legal zoom.
It was simple.
They were so excited, so happy.
They don't have anything yet to leave anybody, but they still did a will.
And they found it was they did the most fun.
They did.
It was simple and they look at this.
I got it right here.
I can print it out, and they fedx it to me, but it was a fully executed legal document.
You make a will, health care directive, power of attorney, living trust.
LegalZoom.com, you do it in September, LegalZoom will donate one dollar from your purchase to the Red Cross.
With legal Zoom, it only takes a couple minutes, and you'll have a plenty of online help and assistance along the way.
You really ought to try it.
It's cool.
LegalZoom, not a law firm.
It was started by top attorneys to provide self-help services at your specific direction.
Go to legalzoom.com.
That's legalzoom.com.
Uh Bob in Colorado Springs.
It's great to have you on the program.
Glad you waited.
Hello, sir.
Yeah, Russ.
How are you doing?
Good.
Good.
Hey, I uh I agree with Ann Coulter that give the Republicans a chance, they'll blow an election after Rove and everybody else is going after uh Chris Christine O'Donnell.
I got a question for you, Rush.
Um government jobs.
Yes.
The Republicans haven't been able to distinguish, at least most people that I know, why are government jobs so inferior to the private sector?
And you're a numbers guy, right?
I'm a literal guy.
Numbers guys, exactly right.
You're a literal numbers guy.
Okay, say for instance, uh government jobs, somebody was making $60,000 a year.
Let's just uh hypothetically say that.
Okay, and they're in a 20% bracket.
That means the government's still on the hook for 48,000 dollars.
Wouldn't that be correct?
Yeah.
Okay.
Well, the private sector job, if they made that that same or the job is worth $60,000.
The government makes, we're just talking about uh uh federal income tax here.
Right.
The government clears $12,000.
Now nobody in the media or the Republicans or any of the sort have came out and said that.
Well, I don't know about the Republicans, but a lot of people are talking about it, Bob.
There are a lot of people talking about the fact that government doesn't create wealth, it only consumes it.
This is what you're saying.
What Bob's example is saying is a government worker 60 grand, hypothetical number.
The government pays somebody sixty, meaning we pay sixty, and the government takes twenty of it back, whatever the tax rate is.
But the government's still out using the the example 40.
Meaning us, meaning it costs all kinds of money to hire government workers, much more than the private sector doing it.
Because the tax revenue they collect from government workers is blown away by how much they pay government workers.
That's what Bob's saying, and Bob is actually right here.
But it's worse than what you said, Bob, because the average government worker makes twice what the private sector worker makes, and aside from the Chevrolet vault, doesn't make anything.
Look at this is not a slight to government workers.
Don't take this personally, but there's nothing produced.
Government does not create wealth.
It confiscates it.
That's all it does.
Doesn't produce wealth, does it create wealth?
And people who voted for Obama are starting to figure this out.
That's what Velma, what's her name?
Forget her last name.
Uh Velma Hart, that's what she was essentially saying to Obama.
Um, I'm exhausted defending you.
When's all this magic supposed to happen?
Is this my lot in life?
Is this my new reality?
You know, where's the new car?
Where's a new kitchen?
You know, where's the vacation to Port au Prince?
Where's my cruise ship food that I can throw away?
Where is it?
It's not out there.
So no, uh, but Bob, the Republicans.
Your expectations here.
No nobody's gonna run for office.
Dashing government jobs.
That's not it.
They're not gonna spend those are Pete, those are voters.
You know, they're there, and they're more and more of them each.
There are millions of them out there, Bob.
Uh and you know, the more government workers there are, the less work each of them has to do.
Anyway.
Uh Castro has figured out what the caller is saying.
That's why he's firing 500,000 of them.
Castro's finally, after all these have figured out, his government's going broke paying all these people.
He tried to buy them off with rice cookers.
You know when I finally saw my first rice cooker?
I didn't even know what a rice cooker was.
Until they have a rally on Washington, but rice cookers, I guess I wouldn't know what one is.
But when I went team vodka golf tream uh tournament out in Hawaii at Hartley's place, uh he hired uh uh a woman to come in and cook breakfast every morning, because he just did.
And she had a rice cooker there.
You know, fried rice was part of breakfast every morning.
I'd never seen one.
It's sitting there on the counter and said, What is that?
It's a rice cooker.
I said, Oh, that's what Castro gave.
Castro gave Snerdley's rolling his eyes, he can't believe I'm admitting this.
Mr. Snergley, see, this is I I'm perfectly comfortable admitting this.
I live in Literalville.
I we don't have a rice cooker at my house.
Well, you know, the rice is cooked the old-fashioned way, but we...
We either get what is it, simple rice in the bag, you put it in there and heat it up and let it evaporate, or you go out and put it in there.
The way I make rice, get uh kettle of big water and chicken broth, brown rice.
Bring it to a boil, let the rice soak that up is delicious.
Yeah, I love rice.
I don't make rice, fried rice.
Yes, I know how to cook right, but I do not have a rice cooker.
I'd never seen one.
What's the big deal about never even seen a rice cooker?
You know, I I I've never seen a bamboo steamer except on TV.
I want to know something.
I I want to know if the Republican Party fathers, the big GOP ruling class guys, are gonna excoriate Meg Whitman for putting the 51st Senate seat in jeopardy.
I know she's running for governor.
I know she's running for governor, but but but but you know, imagine if Christine O'Donnell had an illegal what the Republicans do.
You imagine?
Now, folks, I want to tackle one more thing here about this evolution business.
Remember now I live in Literalville.
Have you heard of the concept of common design?
Give you an example.
All cars have a steering wheel.
But as we all know, a vault is not a Mercedes, but they both have steering wheels.
Now I have two dogs and a cat, and I've heard the scientists tell me that the DNA string, why it's minuscule the difference.
So, so close.
And yet, I'm nowhere near being a sheepdog, and the sheepdogs are nowhere near being me, even though given a choice, I'm sure they'd rather be me than be sheepdogs.
Now, really gonna upset you.
This common design business.
If I'm God sitting around one day and I'm bored and I want to create something, I'm gonna do it efficiently.
What if I can create living things?
Say on the mammal side, where 98% of them are the same.
But the 2%'s what makes them what they are.
I mean, that's pretty brilliant.
My point is, all of this is simple faith.
The Darwinists can't prove what they've done.
All the Darwinists have done is uh permit people to uh eschew faith and religion something meaningful.
But I still hearken back to the whole notion of survival of the fittest.
If you liberals really believe in Dharma survival of the fittest, then how can you support tax cuts?
Or how are tax increases for the rich?
You believe in survival of the fittest.
And how in the world do you build your ideology around equality of outcome?
Aren't you kind of blowing your own Darwinism out the water with your own ideology?
Seems to me you are.
remember, I live in Literalville.
You know, folks, uh, Adolf Hitler loved to point to evolution as the model he wanted for society.
Some reason liberals don't like to be reminded of that.
But it's true, you can look it up.
And uh Tim Geitner also hired an illegal nanny.
▲
Export Selection