All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 27, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:42
September 27, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views express you know who this is, and you know what we do here, and you know you know how right we are.
So hi, Rush Limbaugh on the EIB network and broadcast excellence, the fastest three hours in media.
Uh demonstrated by the fact that we're already in the third hour now.
I I do have an audio soundbite, Ross.
I mean, I yet uh weighted into it, but I will in this hour.
Phone number if you want to appear on the program.
Remember, if you do, your job as caller is to make the host look good.
Uh telephone number 800-282-288.
Well, no, that doesn't mean you just call here and start complimenting me.
It's not at all what it means.
Like that woman from Rutgersylvia made the host look really good.
Sometimes being an idiot is the best thing a caller can do.
Well, sometimes being a talking point is the best thing a caller can do.
800-282-288-2.
Don, I got an email.
Hurt my feelings.
I got an email in the in the not from the subscribers, but from the uh, you know, L Rushball at EIBNet.com said my opening monologue was the worst monologue this guy has ever heard.
That if it's going to be like this, I ought to just quit and go home today and come back tomorrow when I get serious.
I just read it.
Opening our monologue, that's the worst I've ever heard.
You should just, if that's if that's the way this whole show is going to be quit and go home and come back tomorrow.
It hurts my feelings.
All I did was talk about what happened on the weekend.
I didn't make Goff channel.
Uh went out there with Hank Haney.
I talked about the uh Family Guy episode coming up on Sunday on Fox.
That's quite detailed about what happened.
You know, remind you I used to, when this program first started, the first four or five years, every Monday I'd come in here, and the first half hour of the program would be me recounting the weekend.
Everybody loved it.
And I had to stop doing it for security reasons.
And uh stick to the issues crowd sprung up.
Probably gonna get an email now.
You know, this is the second worst monologue you've done today, talking about the first hour monologue.
If you're gonna do this, why don't you just quit and go home?
And you people think it's easy.
You think I've been 23 years and everybody just bows down and uh and treats me with the total deaf.
It's not that way.
There are as many people, if not more people today, who think they know how to better do this than I do.
You think that they could tell me how I should do it better than then I know how to do it better.
Anyway, folks, if you are a Democrat in California, and the state-run drive-by media cannot endorse you.
You know that you are in trouble.
Let me read to you from the San Francisco Chronicle.
Yesterday.
Californians are left with a deeply unsatisfying choice for the U.S. Senate this year.
The incumbent, Democrat Barbara Boxer, has failed to distinguish herself during her 18 years in Orifice.
There is no reason to believe that another six-year term would bring anything but more of the same uninspired representation.
The challenger, Republican Carly Fiorina, has campaigned with a vigor and directness that suggests she could be effective in Washington, but for an agenda that would undermine this nation's need to move forward on addressing serious issues such as climate change, health care, and immigration.
Now, Carly Fiorina, McCain looks at her and you know, starts getting heart palpitations.
I mean, she is Meg Whitman, too.
I mean, it only in California are these Republicans conservatives.
I mean, they are classic rhinos.
They're just this close, I mean, classic moderates, they're just as close to being rhinos, and yet to the San Francisco Chronicle, they may as well be Joe McCarthy.
So the upshot of this is, as they write here at the Chronicle, it's extremely rare that this editorial page would offer no recommendation on any race, particularly one of this importance, But this one necessary exception.
This is one necessary exception.
We believe Californians deserve more than a usually correct vote on issues they care about.
They deserve a senator who's accessible, effective, and willing and able to reach across party lines to achieve progress on the great.
You do not.
You people in California is an out and out untruth.
The people of the San Francisco Chronicle don't care about the Democrat candidate crossing the aisle.
The last thing in the world the editorial board at the Chronicle wants a Democrat senator to do is agree with a Republican.
What is this across the aisle stuff?
That's why we're in the mess that we are in.
Is that too many of our side looks at crossing the aisle as some sort of sign of maturity?
We believe Californians deserve more than a usually correct vote.
They deserve a senator who has accessible, effective, and willing and able to reach across party lines to achieve progress.
Would somebody at the San Francisco Chronicle please call me and tell me what ideas on the Republican side you consider to be those of progress?
I'm not being a nitpicker here.
I want to know what conservative, what Republican issues does the San Francisco Chronicle Editorial Board support.
And if there are some, why can't they endorse Carly Fiorina?
Anyway, this really isn't about Carly Fiorina.
It's bad.
If you're Barbara Boxer and your hometown newspaper can't endorse you.
I mean, in this in this climate where the Democrats are looking at the possibility of losing the Senate, something has to have happened out there that has nothing to do with politics.
Something accessibility.
Maybe she doesn't take their phone calls, maybe she won't go to editorial board meeting, maybe she doesn't invite them to dinner.
Who the hell knows what?
If the San Francisco Chronicle cannot endorse somebody as close to the Democrat National Committee as Carly Fiorina, they'll never cross the aisle.
I'm no, I'm not snurtly.
I'm not trying to insult Carly Fiorina, but uh if all I'm saying is, if they don't like Boxer out there because she won't cross party lines and look for somebody who will, and they got Carly Fiorina, and they can't.
Something here is just people are so discompopulated, it's hard to, it's hard to keep up with them.
Chronicle still couldn't bring itself to endorse a so-called Republican moderate.
This just proves there is no pleasing some people.
That you there is no way to please the left.
This this is really a great lesson.
Because I guarantee you, Carly Fiorina, Meg Whitman are doing everything they can to get the endorsement of people like the Chronicle, liberal, because they live in a liberal state.
Carly Fiorina wants to be senator.
Meg Whitman wants to be governor, and they're thinking like Northeastern Republicans do.
They got to go out and be Mike Castle of the West.
If they're going to get elected as Republicans in California, and they ought to be learning something from this.
Good grief, folks.
Carly Fiorina's got to be pulling her hair out.
What more do I have to do to get these people to love me other than change my party affiliation?
Well, it it didn't what do you mean it didn't work for Arnold?
It Well, they did they couldn't stand him from the get-go out there.
The dirty little secret is that they loved him at all from the first.
What they did was, you know, they everybody was excited about getting rid of Gray Davis.
Now, I mean, this is California, after all.
If it weren't for his Vericos veins, Gray Davis would be totally colorless.
I mean, they want somebody in office out there that lights it up.
That's why Schwarzenegger and Schwarzenegger went in there.
Look at what he did.
He brought in Warren Buffett, running all these moderate guys to try to show.
It just goes to show that no matter what a Republican tries to do to please a liberal, you can't.
For crying out loud.
And I'm not putting, please, I don't even know Carly Fiorina.
I'm not putting her down, but I do know what her politics are.
And believe me, Republicans in that state tailor what they do, if they're running for national orifice or statewide or office, to get the votes and the endorsements from liberal newspapers in Hollywood, liberal groups and so forth.
And this just goes to show you can't do it.
Because of the R. Carly Fiorina could stand for everything the Chronicle loves.
She's got an R next to her name, they won't do it.
They won't pull the trigger.
They won't endorse her.
I gotta go.
Quick time out here.
Time flying.
Come back.
Your phone calls, other exciting things left to do on the inaugural day of the week show here on the EIB network.
Miguel.
No, Juan Diddle Trios.
Uh one did this real.
So Johnny Rivers and uh Memphis.
You know, the the the dirty little secret is not even really a secret.
Moderates are always hated by the Democrats.
Richard Nixon was the biggest moderate Republican ever.
And look what happened to him.
Look what good it did him.
He gave him OSHA.
He gave him the EPA.
Did he he gave him wage and price controls?
What else did he give him the education?
Affirmative action.
Nixon, look at Nixon wanted to be loved by these people because he couldn't stand being criticized by them.
And he gave them all his moderate stuff, liberal stuff, and they still hated him.
And they hated him because he identified a commie SOB and put him away.
Alger Hiss.
There was no way Nixon was ever going to escape that.
Alger Hiss.
I mean, Peter Jennings went to his grave ticked off about the fact Albert Alger Hiss got caught.
He did.
The left, the media, Alger.
Why?
A savior.
He was a Soviet spy.
Nixon exposed him.
Nixon didn't have a prayer.
One of Nixon's closest friends with JFK.
Do I think a conservative could win statewide office California?
Right now?
Yeah.
Damn right.
Of course.
It's his pussy footing around, it's gonna, you know, it's not gonna get anybody anywhere.
Try to be all things to all people.
That state's in as much trouble as any any any other state is in the country.
The people out there want jobs as much as anybody else does.
Well, to the extent that some of the welfare state want to work.
I don't own anymore, but I still have hope.
Most people want jobs.
Adam in uh Jamesville, Wisconsin.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Megadles Rush from the hometown of Congressman Paul Ryan.
Ah, ah, thank you very much.
He had a he had a great uh knockdown with Debbie Wasserman Schultz last week on CNN.
We have the audio with it.
You made mince meet of her, she still doesn't know it.
And we love him for that.
Yeah.
Uh my point is regarding your appearance on Family Guy and the criticism that you're receiving.
Yeah, um, I would just like to remind your audience that you were also received criticism in 1993 when you appeared in Playboy for an interview.
Oh, yeah.
That's right.
I had forgotten I did get a lot of grief for a Playboy interview.
And if I recall your your comments at the time was uh based on the fact that you believed Jesus Christ himself would also appear in Playboy to go where the so-called sinners are.
Yeah, Jesus said you go where the sinners are.
That's exactly what you have a heck of a memory.
Oh, yes, I also I do remember uh phone call that you had uh with a woman, and and she disagreed with you.
She did not think Jesus Christ would go on uh to be on a Playboy interview at all.
Well, he might not have, but he would have sent one of the disciples.
But at the same time, I think uh You think everybody at the Loaves and Fishes was a believer?
I mean, that's the whole point.
Jesus did go where the sinners are.
Went in the belly of the beast.
But it was just that was just a play on words.
Uh anyway, I had forgotten.
I I I'd forgotten that.
I you know who D. Keith Mano, M-A-N-O, did the interview.
And he was a friend of Mr. Buckley's.
Now, one of the reasons I did it is they assigned Buckley did a Playboy interview.
And what R. Keith Menno, R. Keith Menno.
And the reason I did it is because Keith was uh he wrote for National Review.
He was uh uh he tended conservative in things.
Who was the center fold that month?
Uh I only read the articles.
I uh who was the center fold?
Megan Kelly, I don't know.
I don't just kidding.
I have no idea.
I don't know who the center fold was.
I look at you're gonna ask me this stuff.
I'm in a I'm in a giddy mood here.
I have five hours with Hank Haney without a break yesterday.
I got flew all of a 12-hour day yesterday count flight time coming back.
Uh and then I said I watched the football last football game last night, the uh the Miami the Jets.
So I'm in a little giddy uh giddy mood.
Thanks.
Thanks for the call out there, Adam.
I appreciate it.
From the Washington Post last Saturday.
They buried the story on Saturday.
Federal workers becoming a flashpoint in midterm elections.
Listen to this.
This is by Lisa uh R. E. Lisa Rain.
You know her.
You do know her.
That's how that's how you know how to pronounce her name.
As Snerdley knows her.
See, even people of my staff consort with the enemy.
From her sixth floor orifice at the National Science Foundation in Arlington County, Carter Kimsey earns 155,500 a year, helping to conceive and oversee federal research grants to the nation's smartest scientists.
Now stop and think of this.
Listen to this.
Look at me.
Carter Kimsey, federal employee, earns 155,000 a year.
She sits around helping to think up and oversee ways to get federal money to the nation's smartest scientists.
Now, why do we even need this position?
No, this is not somebody giving out the money.
This is somebody figuring out to whom to give it.
To the smartest pe what this woman is doing, she's making 155,000 dollars a year to funnel tax money to people who do all of these stupid studies we talk about here, and scams like global warming.
She sits around and figures out who's gonna get the payoff.
Or who's gonna get bought.
Now, this is a story about federal workers becoming a flashpoint in the midterm elections.
And it's about the fact that uh uh the federal workers make so much more on average than private sector workers do.
Kimsey doesn't see herself as overpaid.
But now the 63-year-old civil servant and almost two million other federal workers are in the crosshairs during this midterm election season, with nearly 15 million Americans unemployed and private sector wages stagnant.
Republicans are hoping to win back Congress in November, have seized on the salaries and the size of the federal workforce as symbols of overspending by the regime.
In their campaign blueprint released last week, the pledge, GOP lawmakers proposed a hiring freeze on non-security federal workers to help cut a hundred billion dollars in government spending.
Now, obviously, Kimsey or Carter Kimsey doesn't think that she's overpaid.
Obviously not.
Nobody thinks they're overpaid.
Right.
Nobody thinks they're overpaid.
Everybody thinks everybody else is overpaid, but nobody thinks they themselves are overpaid.
But this is a what really, why do we need this position?
Nobody even asked this question.
Okay, we're told that we have this federal worker who sits around and quote helps to conceive and oversee federal research grant to the nation's smartest scientist.
Now, this is not the nation's stupidest scientist.
We might understand if we needed somebody to help out the nation's stupidest scientists.
But this story talks about the nation's smartest scientists.
And these these scientists are so smart, but they can't figure out who among them should get the money.
Because in truth, they all think they should get it.
Here's Chuck.
Chuck in Cooksville, Illinois.
Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Russ Super Gang of Gangadiddos.
Thank you.
You betcha.
Hey, I wanted to uh talk to you and the Tea Party supporters out there.
I've talked to a lot of them, and I've been an activist for a long, long time, longer than I care to admit.
Um a lot of people are unaware.
I mean, they've gotten involved in candidacy, and that's great.
We're making a lot of progress there.
Uh, but a lot of people seem to be unaware of what they can do to actually get directly involved in and take over the Republican Party.
Um there's a process called the precinct committeeman process, where you go in, as long as you're a registered Republican, go to your state Republican website, find out what district you're in and when your district meeting is when and where, and go there and say, I'd like to volunteer to be a precinct committeeman.
Right.
They will they will appoint you to be a precinct committeeman if you go in there with lots of your like-minded friends and family and members and so forth uh as precinct committeemen, then you vote for your precinct captains and your district's chairperson and eventually your state.
That's right.
And you can literally take over the party then.
This is this is this is one of the ways.
I mean, precinct level is let me tell you, we were talking about these campaign consultants last week, uh, and and the fact that they, you know, they work in this area 10 to 20 percent, the undecided that's where they get paid, that's where they sway voters.
They're working at the precinct level.
I mean, that's how deep involved, and that's not ideological at all as far as they're looking at.
But yeah, precinct county member or a precinct committee member or or captain is um is exactly a great, great starting point if you're talking about uh grassroots takeover.
All right, we looked it up.
The uh the center fold.
The centerfold in the Playboy issue in which I appeared as the interviewee, that was December, by the way, in 1993, was Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.
Kirsten Gillibrand, New York was the centerfold in No, actually, it was a woman named Arlene Baxter in December 1993.
And during the break, I went back.
You can read the interview at Playboy.com and uh here's here's a little excerpt.
Playboy, why are you Arlene Baxter?
I have no clue.
I really don't know.
I don't know, you can probably find out, Dawn uh at the Playboy website.
Dawn's asking me, Wanda Brunett.
Anyway, here's an excerpt from the interview.
Playboy, why are you doing it?
Limbo.
I've decided to do this interview for two reasons.
First, men and women of great stature have done the Playboy interview.
It's a forum that's been accepted as a legitimate place for the dissemination of all points of view.
Dissemination.
They let that stand.
The second reason is I can think of no better place to have views such as mine, which are the epitome of morality and virtue, published in a magazine such as Playboy.
As Jesus Christ said, you go to where the centers are.
So here I am on the pages of Playboy, attempting in what meager way I can to clean it up.
That's pretty much how it began.
It was brazen.
And you know, 1993, that was that was Shock City.
Uh Mary in Charleston, South Carolina, you're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, I just wanted to ask your opinion on if you're worried about the next presidential election, having a Tea Party candidate, take votes away from the Republican, you know, causing us to end up with another Democrat.
Uh I don't know that there's going to be a third party candidate in 2012.
If there is the Republican Party candidate will be the minority party candidate and will take votes from the Democrat.
If you if not honestly, if if you look in in in Alaska, where Lisa Murkowski is uh running as a right in, she's taking votes in the polling now.
She's taking votes away from the Democrat.
In Delaware, Mike Castle, he's toying around with doing a right in candidate, so they're doing polls.
And they have found a polling data from Delaware is that Mike Castle will take votes away from the Democrat, not from Christine O'Donnell.
All right.
Great to hear.
Absolutely.
Thank you so much.
But I, you know, you're way ahead of.
We got to burn that bridge when we come to it.
We don't they're thinking about whether there's a third party uh in 2012.
There is going to be a continuing conservative ascendancy.
Because Obama's not going anywhere.
The thing the Republicans are going to have to look out for, and we have warned them countless times on this program.
They're going to have to look out for being blamed for the failure of Obama's agenda, because that's what he wants.
When Obama runs for election in 2012, he's going to have to run against something, and he won't run against himself.
And he doesn't want to run against Democrats.
That's he's having true that's that's their problem now.
That's why they're still trying to blame everything on Bush.
They're blaming everything on Republicans now.
The fact that there aren't going to be a vote on tax cuts, that's a Republicans' fault.
Republicans can't stop Obama right now.
But if they win the House, come close to winning the Senate, theoretically they'll be able to stop him.
So Obama's gladly looking forward to that.
The Republicans had uh had best be on the lookout.
New York City, Ed, welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hello, sir.
Good afternoon, Rush.
It's uh it's a pleasure and an honor.
Thank you very much, sir.
Well, I heard you're talking about this woman who makes 155,000 a year reviewing requests for grants.
Yeah.
Well, my wife says the same thing for a private foundation and makes about fifty-seven, fifty-eight thousand less than her a year.
And and what I find interesting about it is if she does perform, and the way you described it sounds extremely similar to my wife's position.
There are layers of people above her making even more money, making the final decision on who's going to make a study on the uh the I guess the you know the effects of crack cocaine on on sheep or something.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
So this is what we fill our government with.
It's it's the government employees.
It's mind boggling to me, and there are conservatives here in New York City rush, and we will be at the polls in November.
Congratulations.
I'm glad to hear it.
That you know, there are the the it would be an interesting thing to chart.
Federal workers, the redundancy, how many people doing the same thing.
Let's not even talk about how efficiently they do it.
A friend of mine uh once back in the 90s trying to explain to me the difference in the public and private sector.
Said, is there if you were gonna start a business tomorrow, is there anybody you know in government you would hire to run it?
Would you look anybody?
You might go looking at somebody who served in a presidential cabinet or something and wants to get out so forth, but just in the bowels, if you will, of the federal buildings, no.
Uh it's there is redundancy out the wazoo.
You know, folks, uh, you never cease to amaze me, you in this audience.
Uh your aptitude for knowledge and for learning.
And that is one of the hallmarks of this audience.
It's one of the hallmarks of me as a host.
I still get jazzed by learning things.
And so do you.
It was just a couple weeks ago that I mentioned the event being held called Constitution Day celebration in Washington.
It was sold out weeks in advance.
You couldn't attend it.
That kind of demand was behind Hillsdale College's decision to put all sorts of energy into videotaping the whole thing and making it available to you online.
El Freebo.
Now, the response has been overwhelming.
I mean, it was gonna be huge because they were letting this audience, you people this audience know that they were doing it, but they have still, nevertheless, as most people always are, still shocked at the number of people, thousands upon thousands of you who signed up at Rushforhillsdale.com To see the seminar, the speeches and the debates on Constitution Day.
Some of the speakers you know, George Will, uh being one Dr. Larry Arne of Hillsdale another.
Some of you uh don't know some of these speakers yet.
Many of the nation's top constitutional scholars and lawyers, all speaking at a dozen or so sessions that you can choose to take in.
And Hillsdale it's still up, and they are paying for all the video streaming.
That's how important it is to them.
It's free.
It's available for yet another week for everybody at Rush for Hillsdale.com.
This is what Hillsdale does.
They educate, they have a strong desire to inform as many people as possible about the basics of the founding of our country.
It's one of the easiest and most complete ways to refresh your learning about the Constitution very quickly.
Rush for Hillsdale.com.
Steve in Bentonville, Arkansas.
I'm glad you called.
I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the program, sir.
Thank you, Rush.
And uh long time first time, and uh an honor, sir.
Thank you.
Um Mega Ditto's, but uh I think you're kind of off the mark on one thing.
I I don't think the uh the Democrats ever intended or intended or intend to let the uh Bush tax cuts come to a vote.
Well, you could be right.
I don't know what they're gonna do.
If I giving you the impression that uh by saying that's what they say they're gonna do, I agree with them.
They just put it off.
They've punted till after the midterms.
I think what they're gonna do is is scour the uh uh countryside, see see what the lay of the land is after the elections to see what is best for them to do politically in that regard.
Yeah, because it if you remember, I mean, four to six months ago before our uh primaries, uh they weren't given any lip service at all to it.
Um I think they've kind of seen the riding on the wall with the uh Tea Party, and uh have started talking about it just to uh maybe win a couple of votes in November by not like they'll ever not not only that.
I mean, there's no question they were trying to win a couple of votes by talking about tax cuts, but they were also trying to suck Boehner in, sucker Boehner in, to opposing tax cuts for the rich with them.
In truth, what they were trying to do is get Boehner to come out against tax cuts for the middle class.
That's what the feint was.
The trick was they wanted Boehner to oppose everything they were doing on this.
And they were what they were doing.
They were talking about extending the Bush tax cuts to the middle class.
They wanted Boehner to oppose it publicly because it didn't include extending a tax cut to the rich.
Then they wanted to be able to go out and say, see, see, Republicans don't care about you in the middle class.
Now, Boehner, even though a lot of people got mad at him for this, shafted them big time.
They had the commercials ready to run.
They already had them produced.
Republicans oppose tax cuts of the middle class and are gonna run Boehner saying so.
But he crossed them up.
So you could be right.
There may not be a vote on this.
They are Democrats, after all, and they don't believe in people keeping more of what they earn.
Just the exact opposite.
You go to the White House website right now.
There's an article there entitled uh Middle Class Tax Cuts Held Hostage.
Now you will notice Obama has no problem with terrorist language when talking about Republicans.
He won't talk about terrorists that way, but he will talk about Republicans that way.
Okay, so you're ticked off at my opening monologue today.
You're ticked off from doing Family Guy.
How about this?
I'm appearing on Greta Van Susterin's show tonight on Fox.
It's a phoner.
Uh I'm not going to be anywhere near a camera.
It's a phoner, and I think it's the first out of the shoot uh at her show at 10 o'clock.
Um so that that may ameliorate.
Some of the in now, now people did not know I did a Playboy interview.
Now they're upset.
They're questioning.
Some are questioning their investment in this show.
They didn't know that.
If they had known I'd interviewed uh in Playboy, they maybe had second thoughts.
Palm Coast, Florida, Dennis, welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program.
Great to have you here, sir.
You thank you very much for taking that call, Rush.
Yeah.
Uh, you mentioned that you watched the uh Miami Jets game last night as I did.
Yeah.
And I wondered if you were as surprised as I was at a company sending a national ad on NBC all in Spanish.
Uh I you know what I did not know that there was an ad all in Spanish.
I believe it was right, I don't want to name the company that uh that uh ran the ad, but I think it was right before halftime.
Right before halftime.
We certainly have a problem with illegal immigration.
We have a huge problem with assimilation of the Spanish folk into the country.
And I see this as just appalling that we would have be running on national TV in national sporting events, all Spanish ads.
Well, I mean, it's it's NBC.
Yes.
Which uh which is for sale.
Now, I it was I think it's Hispanic Heritage Month.
Yes, it is, because the entire game on the sidelines, I don't know whether it was on the sidelines or on the TV, but it had foot the ball Americano.
And then it would say do I don't speak Spanish, but they were saying New York Jets in Spanish.
No, they were saying Jets de Nuevo Ork.
Okay.
Uh yes de Nueva York, uh Dolphins de Miami.
Okay, you're yeah, I saw that.
I saw put the score up there.
So what is this?
And I figured, well, they figure the biggest audience here is um in Spanish Harlem in Miami tonight, I guess.
Well, to me, there are bigger issues facing the country than than companies attempting to split the country again with a look at multi-langual.
I know, but you know, this is frustrating to me too.
Get used to it.
Look at all these companies that you go in all this green garbage, and guess who's leading that parade?
It's NBC.
That's correct.
You're correct.
Uh and it's like like the Nissan commercials all over the place.
Even the the I think they've bought even more time since I call attention to it.
Yes, you're right.
The polar bear?
Polar bear hugging the idiot who buys the electric car?
That's correct.
Yeah.
That's all I I mean.
What these there's there's no courage in corporate America.
There's simply they have their marketing experts, their advertising agency people, which are basically a bunch of feminist women in the basement, the media buyers, and they're very socially conscious, the latest social liberalism of the day.
And if a company thinks they can sell a big Mac by telling you it'll save a forest, they'll do it.
They don't care.
It's not that they care about it's not that they really think the forest is being destroyed.
They just want to sell her big Mac.
Now, this outfit, what was this company advertising?
Go ahead and tell me.
It it was Sprint advertising uh wireless connection and uh internet uh connections through Sprint and so forth.
And and they were doing on the basis of immigrants assimilating, is that what you said?
Uh no, no.
I'm saying that we have a problem with assimilation and running ads that are so it was it was not assisting assimilation or running ad in Spanish.
That's correct.
Yeah.
That's correct.
It was all in Spanish.
I mean, you could you could see what they were showing, so you knew what the ad was, but I don't speak Spanish.
I knew what the ad was talking about, but I couldn't translate it.
There was no translation involved.
It was just it was like a 10, 20 second spy.
Looked to me like a test run.
Look at me like a test run to find out what the reaction would be.
I think I ought to do a monologue of it.
I think this is symptomatic of a whole bunch of things that are happening to our culture.
Uh the feminization of our culture.
I'm I see it in in male liberal sports writers.
I see how they've been feminized.
I see that how how they have have been feministized.
Uh I uh our our culture is more concerned with not offending our enemies today.
Well, uh our we we have a culture.
If somebody attacks us, uh a growing percentage of our country wants to ask, what did we do to cause this?
It's our fault.
Somehow they've been told, and they bought into the notion that America's hated deservedly.
And so this Spanish stuff that you're this ad, this is just is an outgrowth of America thinking it's guilty of being so big and such a superpower that we have to reach out, we have to be nice to the people that we've oppressed or made angry.
That's one of the ways Obama got where he is.
And I think it's it's it's it's facilitating the total degradation of what used to be the American culture.
Because there was a distinct American culture.
It's under assault now from within.
All right, I'm gonna make a promise, I'm gonna make a pledge uh for tomorrow.
First thing off the top show starts, I'm gonna come out ripping Obama a new one to make up for today's rotten, horrible opening monologue.
Uh, remember, folks, the choice of the upcoming election boils down that's either Obama and the Democrats or America.
▲
Export Selection