All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 24, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:45
September 24, 2010, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You know who I am.
You know what this is.
And you know what we do.
And you love hearing how it's done.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday.
Yip, yip, yahoo.
Great to have you back, Rush Lindboy and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
And the most listened-to radio talk show in the country, all across the fruited plan.
When we go to the phones, you can talk about whatever you want.
We try to do more phone calls on Friday as well.
And we probably will today, too, because I am shot.
I am ready for you people to carry the program.
Telephone number 800-282-2882 and the email address, LRushbo at EIBNet.com.
Snerdley is asking me a question.
Did the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette newspaper misconstrue my Heinz Ward story the other day?
I don't know if they wrote about what I said about it.
I didn't.
You know what?
It's a good thing.
I had to go to Philadelphia that day and had a late night, and I forgot all about checking the newspaper.
I don't think they commented on it because they haven't heard.
Have you?
Well, Snerdley, we covered our bases on this pretty well.
I mean, we made it perfectly clear.
And I was driving to the spaceport, and I heard Mark Davis, and he reiterated that this was not about the Steelers.
It was not about Heinz Ward.
It was about the way governments function, a way the way the liberals look at people.
And so I think we covered the bases there pretty well.
Or maybe they still working on it, you know, figuring out how they can thread the needle here.
Never know.
Anyway, great to have you with us here, folks.
I want to go back.
One of my all-time favorite soundbites.
As the left and the Democrats are demanding specificity from Boehner and the Republicans on the pledge, October 30th, 2008, PBS, The Charlie Rose Show, Tom Brokaw and Rose talking about the BAMSTER.
I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.
No, I don't know how he really sees where China is.
We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.
I don't really know.
And do we know anything about the people who are advising them?
You know, it's an interesting question.
He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational speeches.
I don't know what books he's read.
What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?
There's a lot about him we don't know.
Talk about specificity?
There's a lot about him we don't know.
That's right.
We know more about what the Republican plan is than what Obama's agenda was before he was elected.
Pure and simple, they were purposely covering up the Obama agenda.
They had to.
He wouldn't have gotten elected.
So it was, it's just interesting to point these things out.
All right, now we're going to move forward to audio soundbites 12, 13, 14, 15 here.
Because I want to go to the UN yesterday.
Two things happened at the United Nations yesterday.
First, our president, Barack Hussein Obama, went up to the UN and he spoke for about 12 seconds on Iran.
And he said the door of diplomacy is still open, signaling it's okay for Mahmoud Ahmedine Izad to give him a call and talk about things.
12 seconds, 15 seconds.
Then he spends 15 to 20 minutes on the Israeli-Palestine situation, portrays that as the number one flashpoint in the world, and uses I, me, my 34, 45 times, whatever, during his speech.
Now, everybody knows that the Israeli-Palestine situation, which had been going on for 50, 60 years, pales in comparison to the Iranians nuking up.
Yet our president spends figuratively 10 seconds on it.
Then when Mahmoud Ahmedine Zad gets up, Mahmoud Ahmadine Zad starts into his 9-11 truther spiel, where he wants to conduct an investigation to find out just what George Bush knew before 9-11.
Mahmoud Ahmadinezad rallied the United Nations to the belief that the United States was in on, the United States government was in on the 9-11 attacks.
And shockingly, when I see stuff like that, I got to tell you, this depresses me and angers me at the same time.
This is from Ras Mussom.
Democrats in America are evenly divided on the question of whether George W. Bush knew about the 9-11 terror attacks in advance.
35% of Democrats believe that Bush did know in advance of the 9-11 attacks.
39% say they didn't, that he didn't know, and 26% aren't sure.
35% of Democrats believe he did know, which means that if you think he knew, then you have to believe he was complicit in it, that he was part of the whole deal.
As it is, 22% believe that Bush knew about 9-11.
So 35% of Democrats join Mahmoud Ahmedine Nizad in the belief that George W. Bush and the U.S. government knew about 9-11 in advance and in effect caused it, orchestrated it.
During his speech yesterday at the United Nations, his second speech, by the way, his second address to the UN.
And nobody walks out when Mahmoud Ahmedinizad makes these statements.
Nobody walks out.
I think we walked out.
U.S. delegation walked out at some point, but European delegation walked out.
But the thing about this is, folks, that Ahmadinezad's theory resonates in his part of the world.
It resonates in that part of the world which produces terrorists and enemies who wish this country ill.
Now, and he gets two speeches to make this point.
And then also, in addition to saying that Bush knew about 9-11 in advance, Ahmedine Zad also made the point that 9-11 was an inside job.
Now, Ibalwin often pointed out, even during the campaign, how often 160 delegations did not walk out when Mahmoud Ahmedinezad said this.
160 delegations did not.
I've always found it interesting how close, how similar the talking points were during the presidential campaign of Ahmedine Zad and the Democrats about Bush and about the Republicans and about America.
And I always said, If I'm running for president and the insane lunatic leader of Iran is parroting my campaign, I would be embarrassed.
But they weren't.
So let's do a little side-by-side audio.
Three examples.
This is Ahmedine Zad yesterday at the United Nations, a portion of his remarks.
For years, the inefficiency of capitalism and the existing world management structures have been exposed enough for us to understand what they mean.
And the majority of states and people have begun a quest for fundamental changes to allow justice and global relations to prevail.
For years, the inefficiency of capitalism and the existing world management structures have been exposed enough.
Does this not parrot not only what Obama says, but what he's doing?
Obama and the Democrats also believe capitalism is a problem, as does Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, as did Fidel Castro.
Capitalism is the problem.
Capitalism is not the solution.
Capitalism is the problem.
And we're undergoing fundamental changes.
And he's happy about this.
It's Ahmedinezad.
And is not Obama leading the way on that in this country?
Here is Obama, August 9th.
Let's see.
It says here, 1995.
During an interview with Bill Thompson's Ion Books for his book, Dreams from My Father, Obama said this about Africa.
Many of the problems that Africa faces, whether it's poverty or political suppression or ethnic conflict, is just as prominent there and can't all be blamed on the effects of colonialism.
What it can be blamed on is some of the common factors that affect Bosnia or Los Angeles or all kinds of places on this earth.
And that is the tendency for one group to try to suppress another group in the interest of power or greed or resources or what have you.
So essentially, in 1995, Obama ripping into capitalism.
This time last year, Ahmedinezad essentially said at the United Nations that Obama agrees with me, quote unquote.
He said it.
That didn't bother Obama.
Now, yesterday in New York City at the UN, here is Ahmedine Zad once again.
Very recently, the world witnessed an abhorrent and inhumane act of burning the Holy Quran.
The Holy Quran is the divine book.
It calls for worshiping the one God, justice, compassion toward people, development and progress, reflection and thought, defense of the oppressed, and resistance against oppressors.
They burned the Quran to burn all these truths and good judgments.
However, the truth cannot be burned.
Hillary Clinton, September 7th of this year.
The news is carrying reports that a pastor down in Gainesville, Florida, plans to burn the Holy Koran on September 11th.
I am heartened by the clear, unequivocal condemnation of this disrespectful, disgraceful act that has come from American religious leaders of all faiths.
Right.
No, that's all fine and dandy.
I mean, nobody's here suggesting to burn the Quran, except when the American flag's burned, Hillary doesn't speak up.
And when the Bible is burned around the world, Hillary doesn't speak up.
When America is ripped to shreds around the world, the symbols of America are burned and set on fire, or presidents are hung in effigy.
Like George W. Bush, Hillary doesn't pipe up.
But Mahmoud Ahmadinezad does.
September 24th, NPR, this is 2009.
Mahmoud Ahmadine Zad praised Obama's speech at the UN, this is last year, for marking a break with the policies of the Bush administration.
The Iranian president said Obama echoed what the Iranian people and Ahmadinezad himself have been saying for many years.
So here you have the Iranian leader who gets all the 10 seconds of attention from Obama.
They say, hey, our diplomatic door is open, buddy.
Come on in if you want.
And then we go off and start bashing Israel, which is really what spending all that time on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is all about.
So, I mean, folks, does Hillary carry around the Bible?
Does she carry it around?
Does she carry the Holy Bible around?
She upset when people burn it or burn the American flag.
Does she talk about looney tune clerics of other religions?
Does she?
She doesn't.
The Democrat Party is amazingly close and similar to the words and utterances of some of the world's foremost radicals when the subject is the United States of America.
When the subject is this country, Obama, Hillary, the Democrats, Mahmoud Ahmadine Zad, hard to tell them apart.
You know, I find it funny, 35% of the Democrats in the country believe that 9-11 was an inside job, that George W. Bush knew about it.
And yet we're supposed to be outraged that 20% of Americans think Obama's a Muslim.
And 35% think Bush was responsible for 9-11 or knew about it.
And that's a whole hummer.
You know what else Obama said, by the way?
And this is likely going to rile some of you up.
But at the UN, Obama basically told the world that all of their economic woes are the fault of Wall Street.
I read the bite, when I read the quote, especially over the last couple of years.
And Obama said he's going to fix it so that Wall Street can never do them so much damage again.
Now, in some parts of the world, and particularly the Arab world, Wall Street is shorthand for the Jews.
You know it, and I know it.
And there's Obama at the UN blaming Wall Street for the economic now worldwide.
He did it.
Make no mistake about it.
You can bet that Ahmedine Izad believes that many of the problems economically are the fault of Wall Street bankers, quote, unquote.
Here's more.
This is Mahmoud Ahmadine Zad yesterday on 9-11 being an inside job.
Some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order to save the Zionist regime.
The majority of the American people, as well as most nations and politicians around the world, agree with this view.
There is Mahmoud Ahmadinezad, United Nations yesterday.
Some segments within the U.S. government orchestrated the attack to reverse the declining American economy, its grips in the Middle East in order to save the Zionist regime.
The majority of the American people, as well as most nations and politicians around the world, agree with this view, said Mahmoud Ahmadine Zod.
Let's go back to August 19th, 2010, on the MSNBC.
The certifiably insane Representative Alan Grayson, Democrat Florida, was asked a question.
If they accuse him of being a Martian, do you have to come out every once in a while and say the president's not a Martian?
Why don't we talk about how not so much the people who died on 9-11 were disgraced by the possibility of an Islamic athletic center several blocks away?
How about the fact that they were disgraced by a president who let it happen?
It was warned that Osama Laden was actually finding targets in New York City.
There you have it.
So the Democrats, Grayson is just one of many examples who agrees with Ahmedine Zod.
Bush knew about 9-11 advance.
Let it happen.
The lunatics are on the left.
The people that are destroying and are destructive are on the left in this country.
It is striking.
The racism, the sexism, the bigotry, the homophobia, the extremism, the radicals, all on the left.
And they are portrayed as those who are moderate, intolerant, compassionate, open-minded.
Just care about the little guy.
Want the best for the little guy.
John in Garden Grove, California, your next Open Line Friday.
Hello, sir.
Thank you for taking my call, Russ.
I just want to let you know that last night I saw on the television that Chrysler LLC employees were caught smoking pot and drinking beer on the job.
This is the reason why the auto industry failed is because the unions would not let them be fired before.
This is the real reason why they got fire.
They couldn't make it.
You submit that Mercedes-Benz is the finest automobile company in the world.
They could not make Chrysler profitable because of the unions.
But yet until Mercedes, BMW, Porsche, they're making autos all over the United States in non-union shops.
And those automobiles are perfect.
Well, you might get some argument from some people on the best-made cars in the world, but I understand what you're saying.
That you had union workers at Chrysler boozing it up and smoking dope on the job.
WJBK Channel 2 News, Eyeball News in Detroit, here is a portion of a report about that very thing.
We started following them just five days after President Obama's visit and caught them day after day hitting up the party store, then hitting the public park to pound beers.
Oh, and did I mention a little smoking?
The day shift to Jefferson North starts at 6 a.m.
At 11, there's a half-hour lunch break.
The partiers have just enough time to head up to the liquor store, drive about a mile to the park, consume for 10 minutes, and get back to the plant in time to work the last three hours of their shifts.
Hey, guys, hate to be a buzzkill, but shouldn't you guys be building cars?
The government spent a lot of money bailing you guys out, and you're coming out here on your lunch break drinking like this?
Where are you guys going, man?
You're going to go build some cars now?
Have to have a few beers?
Chrysler workers boozing it up and a few doobies on breaks.
And they want to legalize Pod in California, the unions do.
By the way, if you see the video clip of these Chrysler workers, and they're drinking the booze out of plastic brown paper bags, I mean, they're guzzling from the bottles, Dawn.
It's just, it's sad.
They're guzzling from the bottles out there, and they're just, and they're yucking it up, having a great time.
You see them getting the cars to go to work, and they're driving Fords.
If you look at it, if you notice that these Chrysler workers are driving Fords out there.
Now, Obama praised these very workers back in July, on the 30th of July in Detroit at the Chrysler Jefferson North Assembly Plant.
He spoke about the economy and the auto industry.
This plant and your jobs might not exist.
There were leaders of the just say no crowd in Washington.
They were saying, oh, standing by the auto industry would guarantee failure.
One of them called it the worst investment you could possibly make.
They said we should just walk away and let those jobs go.
I wish they were standing here today.
I wish they could see what I'm seeing in this plant and talk to the workers who are here taking pride in building a world-class vehicle.
I don't think they'd be willing to look you in the eye and say that you were a bad investment.
Well, they're boozing it up on their 30-minute breaks in the park and talking some doobies and driving to and from working forwards and Obama's on praising the guys.
And it was Channel 2 in Detroit that did the news.
Channel 2, eyeball news.
Arnold Schwarzenegger, the rumored governor of California, has an op-ed piece in the Los Angeles Times, S-E-I-U, the union, off base on legalizing pot.
Schwarzenegger begins his op-ed.
I was surprised to read that leaders of the state's biggest union, the SEIU, had decided to endorse Prop 19, which would allow Californians to legally grow and possess marijuana.
Any patrol officer, judge or DA, will tell you that Prop 19 is a flawed initiative that would bring about a host of legal nightmares and risks to public safety.
It would also make California laughingstock.
Leaders of the Service Employees International Union say they support Prop 19 so the state can avoid cuts to health care, home care, education, and elderly care programs.
So the unions want to legalize pot so that the state won't have to make health care cuts and home care cuts and education cuts.
This is going to happen.
At some point, I just have to tell you, I don't know when.
I don't know if it's going to be Prop 19 or what.
When these people get going on things, like when the Sierra Club in 1997 had banned the SUV, when they get going, they don't let it go.
There is a legalized pot movement, not just in California, all over the country, on the basis that we need additional revenue for government.
It's going to happen, folks.
Yes, it will, snurdly.
At some point, it's going, and that'll be the one the judges let stand.
You know, the judges will not say, oh, you can't, we got to strike that.
That was unconstitutional.
Judges will let it stand in California.
I'm not saying state legislatures are going to do it.
I'm saying a battle initiative in California, it's going to pass.
At some point, pot's going to be legalized by the peoples in California.
And at some point down the road, if things are going as they are, some state legislature is going to approve it too.
Well, I just think, think back 30 years.
They're never going to legalize gambling for education, Russia.
Never going to happen.
We're not going to go that far off the moral beaten path.
There's lotteries and they're never going to happen.
Right.
They'll legalize it and they sue it for damages for like big tobacco.
Then, whoever thought that we would have casinos on the Mississippi River?
You got them on boats patrolling up and down.
Whoever thought this is going to happen?
And as the, and look, nobody has any money.
No government has any money.
They're all out of money.
And they've got the magic formula.
We're going to have to let go of the firemen and the teachers and the cops.
No, no, please don't.
Well, then we're going to have to legalize pot.
We're going to have to raise property tax or legalize, legalize pot.
Don't raise my taxes.
Because people are going to think only the pot smokers are going to get taxed.
Just like, yeah, go ahead and tax cigarettes all you want.
Tax tobacco all you want.
We don't smoke it.
Go ahead.
Mark, will somebody want to disagree with me that that's not the direction we're headed?
Here's Kevin in Columbia, Missouri.
Kevin was on the phone yesterday.
We didn't have time to get to him.
We were discussing Avasdin, the drug from Roach that is an excellent fighter of breast cancer, a number of other cancers that costs wholesale $7,700 a month.
The FDA is planning to maybe ban it because it's too expensive.
And it was ironic.
I was pointing it out that everybody's getting mad at governments or drug companies or whatever healthcare insurance companies for not covering certain things.
And yet, here's our precious Obama administration planning to get rid of a drug that does help the people who are able to use it.
So, Kevin here had tell us why, in part, Avasdin is so expensive.
Hi, Kevin.
I'm glad you called back.
Hey, Rush.
Did those from Missouri?
It's a delight to talk to you today.
Thank you very much.
Yeah, I mean, I don't claim to be any expert on Avastin, but I know what my dad's gone through.
He's been on it for over a year and a half.
You know, what kind of cancer does your dad have?
He had a brain tumor, a glioblastoma, and it was a stage four, which don't leave you a lot of options.
And he initially tried regular classic, you know, chemotherapy, and it just messed up his system entirely, and he was pretty much left with nothing.
He had a recurrence of it, and it was removed twice.
And he was finally, when he had nowhere else to go, he was introduced to a VASPIN.
And he's been on it ever since for about a year and a half.
So why is it?
What does it cost you guys?
Can you tell?
Will you mind telling us?
Yeah, that's fine.
For a month's dosage, it runs between $20,000 and $30,000.
$20,000 to $30,000 a month?
Yes.
Now, insurance doesn't cover this, right?
Yes, it actually does.
Your insurance does cover this.
Yes.
He got in.
He had to have a lot of help from his doctor to get them to agree to cover it because it hadn't been approved at the time he needed it.
And it was in February of last year.
And then Avastin was approved for his type in May of last year.
That's right.
Now I remember it was covered by insurance, and now the FDA action will take that option away because if the drug is not approved, then most insurance will not cover an unapproved drug.
Right.
That's Obama.
Obamacare doesn't want to cover the death panels, in other words.
So Obamacare doesn't, the government, your health care, we're going to take care of your health care.
That's all they said.
So why is it 20 to 30,000?
Is that what you can't people can't envision that?
$20,000 to $30,000 a month for a drug.
Right.
Yeah, I mean, like you said, you know, yesterday and today, the wholesale cost is really high for whatever reason they determine.
I mean, I don't know why it would be that.
But a lot of the cost is because of the way it's administered.
It's not an over-the-counter like a traditional chemotherapy.
He has to go in and take an afternoon.
The very first thing he has to do is take a blood test.
He has to be in a sterile environment.
You have to wait for the blood test to come back, and then they have to specifically mix the Avastin components to match his current blood chemistry.
And then he has to sit in a room with an IV for over an hour.
So the number of personnel involved is enormous just to administer this drug.
So, and the dosage changes, obviously, or the makeup of the dosage changes every time you have it in the middle.
The makeup is different every time.
I mean, it's completely different because they have to watch, because it does have its own risks, you know, just like every other chemotherapy, and they watch those.
And sometimes he hasn't been able to do it because of either blood problems or anything like that.
But he was diagnosed two and a half years ago, you know, to put it in perspective, with a cancer that is supposed to, you know, take your life in 12 months.
And, you know, yes, it costs a lot of money, but the alternative is obviously not.
So just going on what you said here, your father's had a year and a half beyond the normal life expectancy because of the drug.
Yeah, about half of the people don't make it to 12 months.
And making it to three years, it gets down below 10%.
With the drug or without?
Without this drug.
Without the drug.
This is regular chemotherapy and good resection and all of that.
You get 50%, about 50% will make two years.
What kind of conditions your dad in?
Well, I mean, he's working fine.
I mean, he's back at his job and no disability because of the operations.
He's back at his job with stage four brain cancer.
Correct.
Yeah, he's, you know, he's a strong guy anyway.
And the Obama administration doesn't want to cover this drug, but the evil insurance companies, as you are a testament to, will.
Yes, in this case, they did.
And, you know, a lot of it, too, I mean, to be honest, is mitigating circumstances.
There were really no other alternatives with what he had because his body couldn't handle the typical chemotherapy.
So, you know, it's a lot of money, but I see it as what do you, you know, if you don't have the option, what are you supposed to do?
Well, how much are you paying?
Where does your policy come from for your dad's job?
Actually, for my mother's job.
Your mother's job.
Yeah.
So it's severely discounted after, I mean, the list price in the insurance claim is really high, but it's discounted quite a bit by the time it comes back to money.
What kind of a copay do you guys have?
Oh, I'm not sure what he has.
I don't think he's told me, but I try not to ask him those kinds of questions.
Right.
But like I said, if you're left with no options and then you're not able to use it only because some bureaucratic habits.
Exactly right.
Kevin thanks very much for Columbia, Missouri.
Why should the government be the ones to make this call?
Why should the Obama administration, why should the Department of Health and Human Services, why should Kathleen Sebelius, why should those people be able to make the call as to whether or not this drug is made available to Americans?
Why shouldn't some women be able to sign up for a health plan that covers Avestan?
Because it's used for breast cancer.
It's having the same kind of demonstrable positive impact on breast cancer as it is on brain cancers.
Whose choice is it here?
It's clear.
I mean, the story yesterday was the FDA, the FDA, is going to ban this because it's too expensive.
The theory, well, not everybody can have it, so nobody should have it.
So we were talking about yesterday with a peasant society, a peasant culture.
Now, they're running around scaring everybody into thinking Republicans are going to take away your Social Security.
And here they are actively close to removing a drug from the market by disapproving it simply because of its cost.
We thought the Democrats were all for choice.
But apparently, choice only matters when it comes to abortion.
And if that happens to be your choice, spent some time looking at this last night.
Avastin averages out to cost $8,000 a month to the patient insurance company.
That's what it averages.
By the time, you know, we're here at $20,000, $30,000 is a top-drawer retail price before any of the applied discounts, matching funds, all that stuff happen.
So, Social Security.
Right there it is, even in the Republican pledge.
Why do the Democrats say Republicans are going to take away your Social Security?
In the meantime, the Obama regime is taking away your health care or wants to.
We'll be back with more right after this.
Back to the phones.
It's Open Line Friday in Turlock, California.
Patrick, great to have you on the EIB Network, sir.
Hello.
Hi, how are you doing?
Great.
Basically, I just wanted to touch on the ag industry and Stephen Colbert and all that mess going on right now.
Yeah.
Well, it's a pretty well-known secret amongst the ag industry, which I'm kind of involved in.
I'm out in the middle of it here in Turlock.
All the machinery and equipment already exists to harvest pretty much every crop we grow.
And there's really no excuse to have any migrant workers out there anymore.
I don't know why nobody ever even talks about that.
It's really weird.
I mean, you go to Europe and Germany and France, and pretty much every crop they grow is harvested with machinery and equipment and not with manpower because they don't have the manpower.
So I don't know why it's never even brought up here.
I have no clue.
Yeah, that's just it.
Nobody even brings it up.
Why doesn't anybody even talk about why don't we have the equipment to harvest this?
Well, why do you think?
I don't know.
Well, come on, take a stab at it.
You're out there in an agriculture part of the state.
Take a stab at it.
I'm thinking, I'm kind of wondering if the government promises a lot of the farmers subsidies not to invest in that to keep the illegals here.
I mean, I really.
He's right.
Farms in Europe do not use migrant workers.
Okay, farm, you're right.
Farms in Europe do not use migrant workers.
They use machines.
It's automated.
In the United States, it's apparent they don't want to go automation.
They want to use migrant workers.
Why do you think they would want to use migrant workers?
We're still harvesting our crops like it's the 1800s.
It's absurd.
But why?
Honestly, I don't know.
A lot of the farmers get a lot of subsidies, and so do the dairies.
And that might have something to do with it.
No, no, no.
You're talking about subsidies to grow things and put it in a silo or to not grow.
I'm not that deep in the ag industry.
I don't completely know.
I've never understood it.
A bigger thing I don't understand is why it's never even talked about.
Okay.
So you're not big in the ag industry.
Okay, forget agriculture.
Why would government want migrant i.e. illegals in the country doing anything?
Well, obviously, I think the Democrats wanted its guaranteed votes.
Well.
And not to mention, I wish you'd bring this up too.
Does anybody know that NBC owns Telemundo?
Every illegal alien here has money in their pockets.
It's not because they're so nice.
They just want to get paid.
It's bananas.
I can't believe it.
Well, yes, you can.
You understand it.
Well, I understand it, but I don't know why nobody else brings it up.
Nobody else connects the dots.
I mean, come on.
Well, no.
I don't know.
Wait, you're talking about the telemundo.
You're talking about the telemundo banana dots, or you're talking about immigrants, illegal immigrants in the country, period.
So register for Democrats to vote.
Because everybody brings that up.
Everybody brings that up.
They do everything they can to make them citizens and get them in here legally.
And yeah, I mean, it's pretty obvious it's what the Democrats are.
Well, let me tell you the dirty little secret.
If Democrats could figure out a way for them to vote, even if they didn't have to be citizens, they'd do it.
You know the guy who designed the Hope poster for Obama?
He's lost hope.
His last name is Fair.
He has lost hope.
There's a story on a National Journal.
He understands why he's lost hope and why a lot of Democrats have lost hope.
We'll have the details coming up.
Obama approval rating at CNN down to 42%, ladies and gentlemen.
There's another reason why at some point marijuana is going to end up being legalized in this country.
They know, Democrats know smoking pot causes chemically induced Democrats.
▲
Export Selection