All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 23, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:46
September 23, 2010, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
No, this is not a crazy document at all.
I mean, this the Republican uh the pledge.
Nothing crazy about it at all.
Basic, common sense positions.
I'd like somebody to ask Mike Castle.
You agree with this.
Like this Olympia Snow, do you agree with this?
Uh Susan Collins, you agree.
McCain, Senator McCain, do you agree with this pledge?
I'd like to know what these rhinos have to say about it.
Happy to have you here, Rush Limbaugh.
And the Democrats.
Guess what they're saying?
The uh the Democrats are saying, well, this could threaten Social Security.
Honest to God, the Democrats, right out of page one of the playbook, are saying that the Republican pledge could potentially kill Social Security in a couple of years.
That's the extent of it.
I mean, they they have no plan of their own.
Um obviously Clinton tells them they need a plan of their own.
Well, we know what their plan is.
Folks, I tell you it is pretty fitting.
The BAMster goes up to the UN today, and I swear.
I don't know if we're talking about mental illness, delusional or just calculated lies.
But he took the he t he told the audience at the UN that uh we have made uh groundbreaking strides in renewable and green energy programs, and now we want to share that technology with the rest of the world.
What is he talking about?
There isn't any.
Is he talking about the spaghetti light bulb or the Chevrolet vault?
I mean, he just goes up there because he says it.
He thinks it's either true or is going to happen.
But it was pretty fitting that Obama's up there, the United Nations, promising them that he's gonna shift even more income from the U.S. to the world, while at the same time, the Republicans were in Virginia in front of a hardware store trying to save our economy.
Here's Obama promising to give more of it away as the wrecking ball destruction continues.
And the Republicans with their pledge promising to save it.
Trying to save it.
Now, the the Democrats are in trouble, and they know it.
I mean, the the race in New York, the governor's race, uh, Andrew the Como is now below 50%.
I mean, that wasn't supposed to happen.
Uh, and of course, now some of the Republican intelligentsia get uh get springing into action.
Okay, Paladino, time for you to get serious now.
The moderates are trying to tell Paladino how to alter his campaign style.
Because this might have won your primary, but you're not gonna win the general doing this kind of wacko stuff.
We got word that the Democrats are losing in the Midwest, some of their strongest Midwestern districts are on the verge of being lost or a toss-up status.
Ohio.
Ohio may be gone for the Democrats and for Obama, and then we have the the notion that the uh the whole West Wing is about to leave before the end of the year.
Axelrod's gonna go back to Chicago next year.
Gibbs is gonna replace him.
Gibbs, by the way, never did want to be the press secretary.
Gibbs always wanted to be the number one policy advisor, and they parked him over there in the press secretary office just to keep him around until Axelrod decided to leave.
Larry Summers is leaving.
Uh uh Rom Emanuel heading back now to run for mayor.
Uh, and a lot of these people are leaving prematurely.
You don't generally have this kind of burnout fatigue this soon in the first term of an administration, particularly if it is a successful one.
Everybody wants to hang in, have their name attached to it for as long as they can so that they can then use that parlay that into something very rich in the private sector.
But these people know they better get to the private sector fast because Obama's destroying it.
And if there's anything they want to capitalize on the private sector, they better get there.
They also don't want their names attached to this.
At all.
Even these people, even I mean Summers, none of these people.
Larry Summers going back to Harvard, none of these people want their names attached to this, and they know full well What it is.
And they can't talk Obama out of out of the continued policy destruction.
They can't talk him out of it.
The Woodward book.
You know that finally, the drive-by's are using the correct word to describe this regime.
Dysfunctional.
Obama couldn't care less about winning in Afghanistan.
All he wants is out of there.
And the generals will not tell him what he wants to hear about getting out, so he says, screw you generals.
All right, here's my six-page plan.
This is what we're going to do to get out of there.
I can't lose the Democrat Party.
We're going to get out of there starting in 2011.
Doesn't matter what's going on.
I didn't want this in the first place.
I just had to go over there because I made a campaign promise.
And I said we had to get bin Laden, but I don't want any part of this.
But that is what's happening.
Now, the the Obama voter, I'm going to talk about this pledge for just a second.
I have some bullet points here.
And the Democrats are trying to portray this as, you know, more extremism, but it isn't.
It's not a crazy document.
It's basic common sense positions.
Now the Obama voter, as we are seeing, the Obama voter has all the staying power of a booze-fueled hookup at a bar frequented by Braylon Edwards.
Tea Partiers, on the other hand, are married to a cause.
Now, folks, this is a fundamental difference.
The Obama voter basically was uh was given some ecstasy, the equivalent of getting some ecstasy in a in a bar one night, got drunk, got all wrapped up, here comes the smooth talking guy, and they fell for the guy.
But the Obama voter is not devoted to a cause.
I mean, some of the fringe Obama voters are devoted, obviously, to a cause, but the people we're talking about, the independent women's uh voice, a poll out, the number one issue to independence, 48% repeal and replace health care.
Independence.
These are the precious voters that our moderate Republicans say they're interested in.
Repeal health care.
Mike Castle had no desire to repeal health care.
We don't know that Snow or Collins or even McCain have any desire to repeal health care.
We know the House Republicans want to.
Now the Tea Partiers, I was at Philadelphia last night.
By the way, the Kimmel Center, that was a fabulous night.
All of you in attendance last night, I had a great time, a great audience, 95 minutes, uh, and a lot of Tea Party people there.
I could tell, not so identified, but they were there, but the number of women in that crowd last night.
It was emblematic, I think, of the fact that in the Republican Party today, the power, the energy is with female candidates.
They are the ones that are moving the ball.
They're the ones displaying courage.
They're the ones not concerned with what people think of them or what's being said about them.
They're the ones moving the ball forward.
And there were tons of them last night in the crowd.
It was um just a great time.
And whenever I talked about the Tea Party, in any any reference whatsoever to place erupted, that Tea Party people are married to their cause.
And what is their cause?
It's very simple.
The Tea Party people want to stop the direction Obama's taking the country in.
It's not complicated at all.
They want to repeal as much of the Obama agenda as possible.
They want to freeze spending.
They want to eliminate as much of government in people's lives as possible.
Essentially, they want to re-establish the United States of America as founded.
Plain and simple.
This is being called extremist and dangerous and risky, uh, and tax cuts for the rich and billionaires, uh, and the end of social security by the Democrats.
Now, the Obama voter has no staying power.
They've uh the ones we're talking about, you know, they got they got taken in by a guy by a personality.
Tea parties are married to a cause, and that's the difference between adults who love their country and adolescents of all ages who've been seduced by a fraud.
We're really talking here about the difference between adolescents and adults running the country.
Pure and simple.
What's it gonna be?
We all vote for the adults.
Adolescents can be any age.
And we know that most of Obama's voters are adolescents.
They're children.
They're concerned about all of these nebulous things.
There's a uh Victor Davis Hansen has a piece today.
It's kind of a nice companion piece with the uh story I had yesterday, Thomas Friedman in the New York Times fretting about where's all this can do spirit in our country.
How have we lost that?
It's so horrible.
And of course, he voted for the guy, and it's the number one cause of it.
I mean, we've got the we're being led by somebody who doesn't believe in any of that can do spirit.
He believes this country is guilty.
This country has to pay a price.
Victor Davis Hanson has a piece out told way too many people now have the peasant mentality.
A peasant mentality, meaning, you know, life is just what you get.
What you're born with, that's it.
You don't have a chance for anymore.
And we got to take from those who are luckier.
It's it get part.
Those who win life's lottery, the peasant mentality.
And as a companion story I have in the stack, half of the country no longer think the American dream's possible.
Well, that won't do.
That simply won't do.
And the half that don't believe the American dream's possible, a large of them are on the Obama side.
There are some on our side who are depressed and defeated over what's happened.
But the majority of the 50% who do not think the American dream, the concept of that is dead, are us.
People on our side of the aisle.
Serious adults who are not going away regardless of the results in November.
This is not you, Democrats that better learn this and better understand it.
You're all focused on what's going to happen to you in November.
It doesn't matter what happens.
It's not over.
November is the starting point for the people we are talking about.
The people who want to take this country back.
And by the way, all these critics in the media.
What do you mean?
Take the country back from who?
I'll take it back from you.
Take it back from Obama.
Take it back for the Democrat Party.
Take it back from anybody that's got a capital D next to their name.
That's who we're taking it back from.
That's not complicated.
It's very simple.
They have hijacked this country.
They have hijacked the Constitution and are doing their best to rewrite it outside the bounds of legality.
We're going to stop that.
Pure and Senator take the country back from.
None of this is complicated.
It is so simple.
That's why it's so threatening to these people.
It's America for better or worse in sickness and in health.
We make a commitment.
We make and made a commitment to our country.
Obama's voters, they hit the polls all hot and bothered, and now feel like fools, as evidenced by the questions at his CNBC event.
They're starting to question themselves.
The Obama voter, waking up, ripe for the takeover, starting to question themselves.
As well as Obama and the Democrats.
They can't get their calls returned now.
Before the election, yeah, the regime, Obama talked to them all night long.
Meet you at the bar, hear some ecstasy, have some fun, have a little talk, let's get drunk, and let's get lost in our support for the Messiah.
But now the Messiah's acting like a lot of gods.
They don't answer the phone.
They don't return calls and they don't answer letters.
Now there's nothing wrong with this pledge.
And nothing wrong with this pledge made by Republicans.
But the Republicans need to understand that the support for the pledge does not automatically mean support for Republicans.
We are not going to be seduced like Obama's voters were seduced by him.
What I mean by this, it's one thing to put the pledge out there, and it's not a crazy document.
But follow through is now going to be crucial.
Because there are going to be a lot of victories.
There's going to be a stunning November for a lot of people.
You even think it's going to be big and it's going to be bigger than a lot of people think.
So there's going to be opportunity to implement some of this stuff.
I I know we're not going to have the presidency.
We can't repeal a whole lot of stuff.
We start setting the table.
It's time lip service ain't going to pull it off anymore.
Is all I'm saying.
Because it's the country that we love, not the party, not institutions in Washington.
We're not caught up in that.
We love the country.
And anybody there representing us to defend the country's first principles, and the people will receive unbridled, unquestioned support.
Now we're not going anywhere.
We're not going to abandon the cause.
Might abandon individual people who don't follow through on their quote-unquote pledge.
We're not going to abandon the cause.
It's too important.
Everybody knows we're in the midst of a disaster.
We're in the midst of losing this country is founded.
And there are enough people who love it enough, consider it worth fighting for that one election is not going to make the difference in their attitude about it.
Now the elites have hijacked our country.
And I don't mean people that are better than us.
I think these are people that are not better than anybody else.
They think they are.
They have told themselves and told us they're smarter, they're brighter, more educated, more sophisticated, they're not.
They have they be lost with a hammer and a nail and a piece of wood.
What do I do with this?
They're lost in the world of common sense.
So the pledge is out.
We'll go through it bullet point by bullet point.
Got Paul Ryan talking about it on Good Morning America Today.
Lots of stuff.
I want to get to this the two stories, Victor Davis Hanson about a peasant mentality overtaking the that interests your snurtly.
That's uh it's pretty well written piece, and this whole notion that for half the country the concept American dream is dead.
That's just unacceptable.
We're not going to accept it and deal with it here on this program.
That's got to change.
So a lot to do today.
Plus your phone calls.
It's all coming up right after this.
And we're back.
It's Rush Limboy, and the fastest week in media, already Thursday.
On the excellence in broadcasting network.
All right, the uh the Republican pledge is divided into five parts.
One spending, two jobs, three government reform, number four, national security, number five, health care.
On spending, to cut spending, the Republicans say they are committed to canceling remaining expenditures for the 2009 porculus bill and return domestic appropriations to 2008 levels.
Which, fine and dandy, that's plenty of money.
I mean, we've gone into debt.
The amount of debt, the spending since 2007, when Pelosi and the Democrats took over the House, and you go to 2009 when Obama was immaculated.
Uh, we don't need well, we don't have the money we're spending anyway.
I mean, it's it's a it's a moot point.
Impose hard budget caps on discretionary spending accounts and reduce spending for congressional operations, have weekly floor votes on winners of the U Cut program.
It allows citizens to vote online for programs that ought to be slashed, and the troubled asset relief program.
Now that's big, and there's still money left over in that academy.
Remember, that's TARP.
And remember, we were told we had 24 hours to authorize TARP, or else the world financial system would collapse, including ours.
And the Republicans held firm on the first vote, and they didn't vote for it.
And two weeks went by after we were told that we were going to plunge into the abyss after 24 hours.
Two weeks went by, and that's when the strong arm tactics began.
That's when the Treasury Secretary, what was his name?
Uh the guy from Goldman Sachs.
I forget his name, Bush's guy, dragged everybody in there.
All these bankers, three o'clock in the afternoon, gave them till six o'clock to sign this thing, agreeing to accept bailout money, even yeah, Hank Paulson, even if they didn't want it, even if they didn't need it.
So there was a lot more going on here than the truth, at least what we were being told.
So end TARP.
It turns out that it wasn't even necessary.
A giant fraud perpetrated on the people of this country.
They also pledge to end government control of a secondary home mortgage lending giant, Freddie Mack and Freddie May.
Freddie, uh uh Freddie MacFannie May, and they freeze federal hiring for non-security jobs and sunset programs after a certain number of years.
Nothing crazy about any of this.
Warren Buffett says we are still in a recession.
Well, I that's that's uh thought the experts told us uh last week were out of the recession uh June a year ago, June 2009.
Mart Vuckerman has another piece out saying that the American dream is a nightmare.
The American dream of home ownership is a nightmare.
And this is from a guy who supported Obama.
This is from a guy who told everybody else we need to vote for Obama.
This is from a guy, I mean, all of these people, the smartest people in the world telling us that a new day had dawned in America with the fact that Obama was trotting the soil and uh and trotting the earth.
And now Warren Buffett, billionaire investor, disputing this week's assessment by a leading arbiter of economic exhibition of Harvard professors.
He said, We're still in a recession.
We're not going to be out of it for a while, but we will get out.
Back to the pledge.
On the spending side, they promise or they pledge to freeze federal hiring for non-security jobs, sunset programs after a certain number of years, use more straightforward budgeting for entitlement programs.
Now the second section is jobs.
And here, they pledge to stop all of the planned 2011 tax increases, including the expiration of the 2001 Bush tax cuts for individuals and the reestablishment of the estate tax.
It calls for a small business tax deduction that allows owners to take a 20% deduction, roll back the so-called 1099 requirement that businesses report certain spending to the IRS, and establish a requirement that new federal regulations that cost more than a hundred million dollars get congressional approval.
Now, as I said, go on and do the whole thing.
There's nothing extreme or wacky or crazy about it.
It's basic common sense positions, and it is what people are clamoring for.
It's people want an end to what is happening now.
They want the breaks applied to the Obama agenda.
I just love listening to all these Democrats react in panic to it.
Because all they can do is spout all of their worn-out templates, all of their worn-out narratives, yeah, this is gonna end social security, uh, this is going to nothing more than tax cuts for the rich.
Uh, all of this.
It really are a bankrupt bunch of people.
The Democrat Party today has no ideas they can sell.
The people of this country, if they were to honestly hear, they were honestly be presented with Obama's agenda prior to the election, he would not have gotten 30% of the vote.
The Democrat Party, the socialist Marxist agenda, whatever you want to call it, if ever put to a vote would get creamed in a landslide.
They can't be honest about it.
And people are running around saying, well, where's your agenda?
Well, you mean like a 21-page, yeah.
Well, we don't have one.
Of course you don't have one because theirs is nothing but fraud and deceit.
The Democrat plan's very simple.
Lie to the American people present a whole bunch of fictitious, fraudulent people spouting platitudes, citing fear, get elected, and then govern against the will of the people.
It's very simple what's happening here.
We are being ruled by a really small minority, made to look larger than it is because their minority includes the media.
The so-called media.
So against fraud and deceit, here comes a document that's pretty basic.
And tailored for the Times.
Now it's depending on where you go to read it's 21 pages, 26 pages.
They need, I think, to put this out in bullet form, like I, ladies and gentlemen, have done here.
It doesn't exist as I have presented it to you.
Of course, that's why I'm host and why they are in Congress.
But they need to do this in bullet points so people can see it.
Rat, tat, tat, tat.
Now the White House responding to this thing.
The White House claims literally tax hikes for 110 million middle class families and millions of small businesses.
That's that's what the Democrats are saying is in the pledge.
It's not in the pledge.
There are no tax increases in the pledge.
There are no tax increases for anybody.
And you know what?
There aren't even any real tax cuts.
It's just the maintenance of the current tax code.
Now there are the 20% tax rate on small businesses or 20% deduction is uh a little bit of a tax cut.
But they're also claiming tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires by borrowing 700 billion dollars we can't afford.
And this is infuriating to me.
What they're saying is that extending the Bush tax cuts will cost the government 700 billion dollars.
700 billion dollars that we can't afford.
Never mind and and but we're in the situation we're in because of two unfunded wars and two unfunded tax cuts.
And so now we can't follow through.
We we we cannot uh extend the Bush tax cuts because tax rates, essentially, because it'll cost the government 700 billion dollars.
Let me give you an alternative way of looking at this.
And I d just I I'll accept their bogus hypothesis for the purposes of making this simple in an explanation as I can.
Let's say that cutting taxes or extending Bush will cost the government 700 billion dollars.
Let's just say that.
The purpose is I've been in toning all week.
The purpose of tax cuts is to keep money in the private sector to grow the economy.
And I maintain that growing the economy and cutting taxes further would make that $700 billion minuscule in terms of the amount of money it would generate and raise.
But it's sophistry to say that it's gonna cost the government $700 billion we can't afford.
We can't afford anything Obama has done.
We cannot afford anything he's done.
We don't have the money for anything Obama is doing.
The Democrats have nothing positive to run on.
That's why they're not going to publish an agenda.
They can't.
They don't dare be honest about what their policies will do.
And everybody, well, more and more people are seeing this now because even the people that showed up Obama's town hall on CNBC.
Mr. President, uh, is this our new reality?
Is this it?
These are the people took the ecstasy in the bar, got all caught up, and now finding out that they were defrauded.
Here's Paul Ryan.
He was on Good Morning America today with Stephanopoulos talking about this.
Stefanopoulos said, You heard the president.
He said this is the exact same agenda that Republicans had before he came to office, and that this is what got us in the mess.
How is this different?
First of all, cutting spending, creating jobs, and putting the policy of economic growth in place and cleaning up the way Congress works, not only stands a stark contrast to this Congress and this president, but actually, George, it stands a bit in short contrast to the way Republicans conducted ourselves a decade ago.
We need to own up for the fact that when we are in the majority, we spent too much money, we lost our way, and we got to get that back.
We are here trying to reclaim our country by rededicating ourselves to those timeless principles that made us exceptional.
These are the basic building blocks to get us on the right track, the first steps.
Stephanopoulos says, okay, now you've you got the pledge.
What will you pledge to pass in the first year if Republicans take control of the House?
Now that who knows?
I mean, did we we what are you gonna pass?
We're talking about objectives.
We are talking about philosophies and principles that will go long beyond election results in November.
But anyway, here is how Paul Ryan answered this silly question.
If we got in control of Congress tomorrow, here's what we would do.
And there are dozens of pieces of legislation here we're talking about.
First of all, the health care bill, we think is a disaster.
It's making the deficit worse.
That's according to the president's own actuary.
It's making health care costs go up.
We would replace this health care law with consumer-directed health care.
We would cut spending right away.
We would rescind TARP, we would do a federal hiring freeze.
I can get you 1.3 trillion right there in spending cuts, and we would prevent these massive tax increases from hitting our economy this January 1st.
What we're trying to do is remove uncertainty so that the economy can grow.
There's a big uncertainty problem.
Businesses aren't hiring.
We want to address that.
Right.
And they're and they're sitting on tons of cash, as everybody knows.
And they're smart not to invest it.
They have no idea really what circumstances they're going to face once the new year hits.
So, Ryan Rat tat, okay, what are we going to do?
Okay, here it is.
Here it is, George.
What Stephanopoulos ought to do, go go get any Democrat, go get anybody from the Democrat Party from the Obama regime, bring them in and ask them what they're gonna do.
And you know what?
You you know what you're gonna hear?
Carbon taxes, cap and trade, green energy, renewable energy.
Uh we can't go back to where we were.
We can't turn the keys back, we can't have the keys back, we can't go back to the problems that put us in this mess.
That's all they can say.
Because they will never ever be honest about what they're going to do.
If if if your intention was to destroy the country and you knew the people didn't want it destroyed, would you tell them that's what you're gonna do?
Of course not.
Neither are the Democrats.
Yeah, media is gonna you watch, they're gonna insist that this is not specific enough.
The Republicans need to get more specific in their presentation.
Meanwhile, the Democrats are refusing to even present a budget.
The House Democrats are not going to even present a budget prior to the election because they can't afford for any of you to know exactly what their budget intentions are.
So while their buddies in the press are gonna run around and demand even more specificity, and they're gonna accuse Paul Ryan and all these other Republicans of being suspects simply because of this pledge and its contents.
They're gonna demand even more specificity without demanding the same from the Democrats, who will not even present a budget.
On Morning Joe today, Clinton appeared.
Mika Bzinsky.
Can you understand the White House might have some difficulty communicating on this convoluted issue of the economy?
Uh what can they be doing better?
Democrats ought to put on one card, no more than five and no fewer than three things that will be their priorities.
We've still got a chance here.
We got 30 days to have an honest debate.
I know how easy it is to lose control of the debate.
Happened to me in 93 and 94.
The president and the Democrats, even at this late date, should do this as an opportunity and an obligation to say, all right, they've organized their national plan.
Here's what ours is.
If you hire us for two more years, here's what we're gonna do.
They can't do it, Mr. President, and you can't either, because you'd have to lie.
You can't be honest what you're gonna do.
I mean, you're gonna tell them you're gonna move for amnesty.
Are you gonna tell them, yeah, we're we're gonna find a way to legalize 15 to 20 million illegals so that we can turn them into Democrat voters?
Can you be honest about that?
Is that what you can tell them you're gonna do?
You're not gonna tell them that.
Are you gonna tell them you're gonna raise taxes on every carbon transaction or existence that occurs?
Are you gonna tell them how much their taxes are gonna go up across the world?
You're gonna tell them how much health reform is gonna cost them and how little and less access to health care they're gonna get.
Are you gonna tell them the truth about any of this?
You can't.
The Democrat Party wouldn't stand a prayer if they were honest about even one agenda item.
The Obama people, they don't want to even give the keys car back yet.
They're not through stripping the car.
If they want to use this automobile analogy, then let's take it full out.
Obama loves to say, well, we can't give them the keys to the car.
Why they drove in a ditch last time.
They don't want to give the keys back.
They're not through stripping the car.
The car being the country.
Back in a minute.
That's right, my friends.
Keep a sharp eye.
They're going to hear the drive-bys and the Democrats and they're talking to Republicans about the pledge, and a demand that they be more specific.
What do you really mean here?
And every time you hear that, just remember Nancy Pelosi saying, well, we have to pass this health care bill before anybody will know what's in it.
Just remember that the members of Congress that passed that abomination had no idea.
They hadn't read it.
And even Max Baucus, who wrote the health care bill in the Senate, said he didn't read it.
It's too statutory, he said.
Meaning it's legal ease.
We have experts to do that, he said.
The people that supposedly are the authors didn't read it.
And they're going to run around and they're going to demand all kinds of specificity.
There's a new day coming.
Folks, I I I told the people of Philadelphia last night, and by the way, the audio of the Philadelphia appearance, 95 minutes is up on the members only side.
The transcript is for everybody.
The audio's up on the members only side.
And I told the people of Philadelphia, you know, I've been doing this for 23 years, and I'm constantly looking back to ask myself if I could have done something different.
Now, one of the things I'm asking myself is, did I not take these people seriously enough?
We laughed at them all these 23 years.
You know, they're liberals are really funny when they're out of power, because that's when they get wacky and stupid.
They're more dangerous when they're in power.
But now I I I never, I never, honest to God, folks, because of the faith I have in the people of this country, I never really believed that the people of this country would elect somebody who intends to destroy it.
And they didn't knowingly.
They didn't knowingly.
But I'm gonna always ask myself if sometime in these past 23 years, and I'm not saying I don't I'm not beating myself up, don't misunderstand.
But for a lot of, you know, liberalism was something to laugh at, and it still is.
But now it's more now we're talking, now we're talking Marxism.
You know, now we're talking we always thought these people, and they still they are.
See, this is they are a fringe minority in this country.
They're liberalism is nowhere representative of a majority body of thought in this country.
But they happen to own entertainment, education, and media.
And so it appears that they're much more prevalent and larger a majority when they're not.
And now look what we're faced with.
I mean, we we cannot simply just make fun of this.
This has to be stopped.
Politically, this has to be stopped.
The Democrat Party agenda has got to be arrested.
And it's well, well, tell myself, well, part of me says, yeah, it had to happen in order to wake people up.
And there is a theory that because of this, that they're never ever gonna be majority victors in elections ever again.
And people finally have woken up and see it.
But I've always I've always told people, no, we don't want to elect people like this just to show how bad it can be so people will learn and never do it again, even though it uh it has had.
By the way, Mike Castle is not ruling out a write in campaign in Delaware.
Mike Castle not ruling out a write in campaign for the Senate in Delaware.
You think he would take the um Republican pledge?
Back after this.
Now I get into it when get back.
Uh and here it is.
This is from uh ABC News, ABC News poll.
Only half of American citizens still believe in the American dream.
Only half.
That's that won't do, folks.
That is simply unacceptable.
▲
Export Selection