All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 8, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:46
September 8, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ha.
How are you?
El Rushball and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Utilizing talents on loan from God.
Here's the phone number, 800 282-2882.
The email address, L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
So a pastor where.
Where's this pastor?
Where's this pastor?
What's the guy that wants to burn the Quran?
He's in Gainesville, Florida.
On 9-11, between 6 and 9 p.m. wants to burn the Quran.
So a lot of people are reacting to this.
Hillary Clinton said this yesterday in Washington about the idea.
The news is carrying reports that a pastor down in Gainesville, Florida, plans to burn the Holy Quran on September 11th.
I am heartened by the clear, unequivocal condemnation of this disrespectful, disgraceful act that has come from American religious leaders of all faiths.
Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation.
And then the mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg, held a press conference yesterday in the city and said this.
In a strange way, I'm here to defend his right to do that.
I happen to think that it is distasteful.
I don't think he would like it if somebody burnt a book that in his religion he thinks is holy.
But the First Amendment protects everybody.
And you can't say that we're going to apply the First Amendment to only those cases where we are in agreement.
Okay, so Hillary finds it reprehensible.
Bloomberg finds it reprehensible, but he doesn't think it's uh worth enough to stop it.
First Amendment.
So the um pastor down there in Gainesville seeking prayer and guidance whether they should burn the Quran.
I like to put stories like this in perspective.
Well, because the reason I want to put stories like this in perspective, I when I was over in Hawaii, um, with my golf buddies.
I forget what it was, but I went on a tirade and a rant.
One afternoon we'd finished playing golf, we're out on my buddy's deck, we're waiting for dinner to be fixed.
Somebody said something about something in the news, and I said, I don't believe it.
It's the media.
I don't react to anything.
And then it's all fake, it's all trumped up.
The media is not about what's news anymore.
The media is not sitting around watching what's happening and reporting it.
They're they're they're moving agenda items and so forth and so on, and I just I wasn't even gonna talk about this, not even get sucked in by it.
But I decided I'd go do some research on this.
And I have two stories.
First, Monday, May 4th of 2009, from um this is uh Al Jazeera.
A former Afghan prime minister has called for an inquiry after Al Jazeera broadcast footage showing Christian U.S. soldiers appearing to be preparing to try and convert Muslims in Afghanistan.
Ahmed Shah Ahmedzai said that there must be a serious investigation.
And after military chaplains stationed at the U.S. air base at Bagram were filmed discussing how to distribute copies of the Bible printed in the country's main Pashto and Dari languages.
Ahmed Shah Agmeg Dazi told Al Jazeera from Kabul on Monday, this is a complete deviation from what the U.S. military is supposed to be doing.
I don't even think the U.S. Constitution would allow what they're doing.
It's completely against all regulations.
So Al Jazeera, back in um 2009, was accusing our troops of trying to convert Muslims to Christianity by printing printing Bibles in native languages.
And they were being taught in seminars how to do the conversions.
Said the sheikh Ahmed Shah Ahmedzai.
This is very damaging for diplomatic relations between the two countries.
Everybody knows that people are very conservative here, very faithful to Islam.
They will never accept any other religion.
This idea to try to convert Muslims to Christianity, not even constitutional.
Somebody who leaves Islam is sentenced very severely.
The death penalty is imposed, the guy said.
There must be a serious investigation now that it's come out into the public and into the press.
So they were demanding an investigation of the U.S. military for trying to convert Muslims to Christianity in Afghanistan 2009.
And Ahmed Shah Ahmedzai said, look at they're not going to shift.
If they do, they get killed.
Somebody who leaves Islam is sentenced to death.
Saeed Alam Udin Aser of the Islamic Front for Peace and Understanding in Kabul told Al Jazeera, it's a national security issue.
Our Constitution says nothing can take place in Afghanistan against Islam.
If people come and propaganda other religions which have no followers in Afghanistan that creates problems for the people for peace and for stability.
This was all on Al Jazeera.
The footage shot about a year ago by Brian Hughes, a documentary maker and former member of the U.S. military who spent several days in Bagram near Kabul was obtained by Al Jazeera's James Bayes, who has covered Afghanistan extensively.
It is not clear that the Bibles were distributed to Afghans, but Hughes said that none of the people he recorded in a series of sermons and Bible study classes appeared to be able to speak Pashto or Dari.
He said the only reason they would have these documents there was to distribute them to the Afghan people.
I knew it was wrong.
I knew I knew that filming it, documenting it would be important.
Questioned about the footage.
U.S. Colonel Greg Julian told Al Jazeera, most of this is taken out of context.
This is this is irresponsible.
It's inappropriate journalism.
This footage was taken a year ago.
The Bibles were taken into custody and they were not distributed.
The Bibles were taken into custody.
These are the Bibles reprinted in native languages.
Afghanistan were taken into custody and not distributed.
Now that that was from May 4th of 2009.
Reuters the next day, May 5th, 2009.
Bibles in Afghan languages sent to a U.S. soldier at a base in Afghanistan were confiscated and destroyed to ensure that troops did not breach regulations which forbid proselytizing, according to a military spokesman.
The U.S. military has denied its soldiers trying to convert Afghans to Christianity after the Qatar-based Al Jazeera TV network showed soldiers of the Bible class trying to blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
U.S. Central Command's General Order No.
You know how they destroyed the Bibles?
They burned them.
They did.
The U.S. military burned the Bibles.
In foreign language.
Now you.
I'm just trying to bring a little perspective to this.
I can now confirm the Bibles shown on Al Jazeera's clip were in fact collected by the chaplains and later destroyed.
They were never distributed.
Now you compare and contrast this event with the current outrage over some crackpots plans to burn a couple of Korans in Florida on September 11th.
State Department spokesman called the pastor's idea unAmerican.
Do you remember any outrage when the U.S. government destroyed Bibles in order to avoid offending the sensitivities of Muslims in Afghanistan?
I don't think you remember that, do you?
Because the you probably know you're just hearing about this for the first time.
the pastor in Gainesville has 50 congregants.
That's how many people in his uh flock at his church in Gainesville.
Estimates of the rate of ice loss from Greenland and West Antarctica.
One of the most worrying questions in the global warming hoax should be halved, according to Dutch and U.S. scientists.
In the last two years, several teams have estimated Greenland is shedding roughly 230 gigatons of ice, 230 billion tons per year.
West Antarctica, around 132 gigatons annually.
Together, that would account for more than half of the annual three millimeter yearly rise in sea levels.
According to the news study, published in the September issue of the journal Nature Geoscience, the ice estimates failed to correct for a phenomenon known as glacial isostatic adjustment.
Oh, yeah, they forgot that.
Glacial isostatic adjustment.
You would have thought that some of these scientists would have remembered about glacial isostatic adjustment.
But they forgot to faculate that when they were contributing and calculating the hoax.
Glacial isostatic adjustment is the term for the rebounding of Earth's crust following the last ice age.
A good analogy is that it's like a mattress after somebody been sleeping on it all night.
The weight of the sleeper creates a hollow as the material compressed downward and outwards.
When the person gets up, the mattress starts to recover.
This movement seen in close-up is both upwards and downwards and also sideways too.
This is the glacial isostatic adjustment that scientists forgot to calculate as they were planning the global warming hoax.
Now, what it all means is that only half the ice that they thought was going to melt is going to melt.
There isn't gonna be any abnormal uh over the top.
No, this is all a hoax.
They what they they they forgot to hide the decline.
Basically, here is what uh happened.
We we have concluded the Greenland and West Antarctica ice caps are melting at approximately half the speed originally protected.
By the way, this phenomenon, the glacial isostatic adjustment, which is compared to uh a mattress after somebody's been sleeping on it.
There is no such thing.
It's been proven as glacial isostatic adjustment on a sleep number bed from select comfort.
Back to the phones we go, Rush Limbaugh, middle of the week Wednesday, fastest three hours in media, Lafayette Indiana.
Josh, great to have you on the program.
Hello, sir.
Hi, Rush.
How are you today?
Very well, sir.
Thank you.
Glad to hear it.
The point I have today is with all these uh campaigns and elections, the candidates that we need to be skeptical of are the ones who wish to label themselves as fiscal conservative.
My thought on the matter is why make that distinguishment?
If you're a conservative, then you're already a fiscal conservative.
If you're not, then maybe you're a social liberal.
Well, of course that's the answer.
You can't be both.
Uh fiscal conservative uh is somebody who wishes the social issues would not rear their head in politics.
Uh or like to call him a hyphenated liberal.
Well, that works and silent.
I um it's it's it's it's uh I look at we've talked about folks.
This is really nothing new.
I mean, if we could go back to the archives of this program, even during the beginning of the Obama regime, I talked about the divisions in the Republican Party, and I told you that the social issues Are the dividing point.
I told you.
I told you there are a bunch of country club blue blooders who don't want the social issues to be anywhere near Republican Party politics.
They don't want anything to do with it.
This is one of the things that's so frustrating to people.
We have, I mean, here's Obama.
He's up there again.
He's out in Parma, Ohio.
He's delivering a speech on the economy.
We tried it their way.
Last ten years.
Oh, those policies got us in this mess.
They want us to go back to utter lies.
Utter, utter lies.
We're in this mess because a him.
19, 20, whatever it is, months of him is why we're in this mess.
Right now, the uh the whole the whole notion of Republicans saying, well, this is social issues.
Uh broom them if you want to.
But I mean, don't sit there and try to get them out of the political sphere.
It's a shame that they're in there, but they are.
It's a reality that's going to have to be dealt with.
But I guarantee the vast majority of Americans right now are not opposed to Obama because he may be pro-choice.
Uh anyway, thanks for the call out there, Josh Patrick in woo.
Wasila, Alaska.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Great to be on the program, Rush.
Thanks.
You bet.
Um, like I told you, screener, I think that this November's election will go down as the war against the incumbent in history.
I mean, there's a lot of uh new registration vote, you know, coming out over the last three years, new and national interest and everything, and a lot of these people coming out to vote, they haven't been politically indoctrinated.
They're not using political logic, they're using common sense.
And their common sense is telling them that the people who are responsible for how a job has gotten done are the people who have been doing it.
Well, but yeah, and who is it?
Now, do you do you think that these new arrivals are holding all incumbents equally responsible?
Yes, they are.
I mean, common sense, you know, it does dictate that they are responsible.
They're the ones that they are, they're the ones that have uh wait a minute, but there are conservative incumbents who are not going to lose.
This this is a war against liberalism.
Well, we're we're in this mess because the three and a half years of the Democrats controlling the Purse Springs in Congress, we're in this mess because of Obama being in charge of the uh government along with Pelosi and Reed for the last 19, 20 months.
They've had it for a couple years before that.
The media would love you to believe this is a war against incumbents, but it's a war against liberalism.
Well, if you want to if you want to consider liberalism, our growing our dependence state by state on federal funding, okay.
I mean, we've uh basically we've grown our dependency on federal funding in each state by making it the name of the game.
Okay, we we've been hi uh electing politicians over years that are saying they're gonna go back and get us the most money, not free up the most opportunity in this country, okay, not like free market capitalism, you know, where we go get uh get opportunity for our state.
Instead, we're just going and getting the cash, which all that's doing is growing our dependency.
Yeah.
Okay.
Now, we have all kinds of resources, especially in Alaska.
We want those resources freed up so that we can grow private sector wealth, grow private sector jobs.
Okay, and we're not going to do that by continuing to uh have our federal government say, well, no, don't take that.
Take this cash instead.
Okay.
Uh we need to get away from that.
We need to get away from that.
Well, I understand what you I totally agree, but that that is ideological.
You you've got some Republicans who believe in that kind of stuff that you're you've just described, but they're not conservative Republicans, and they are vulnerable.
So what this is all about.
This is a war against liberalism.
This is a war against socialism.
It's not just a war against you call it statism, and you just describe statism.
You just describe the government giving benefits away in exchange for votes.
And yeah, there's some Republicans have done that.
They may be vulnerable as well.
But they aren't conservatives.
Dependency on the government is liberalism.
Socialism.
Or even worse.
Patrick, thanks much.
I appreciate it.
Stuart Florida, this is Don.
You're next on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Okay.
I believe that Obama is 100% the cause of this recession mess we're in.
And I am disappointed that Republicans and talk radio let Obama get away with blaming Bush and the Republicans for the mess he inherited.
Bush did a good job, even with the Democrat Congress.
If you look at the timeline, the economy was in a nosedive when Clinton left office.
Even with 9-11, hurricanes, earthquakes, forest fires, and floods.
Pestilence, too.
In the third year of the Bush second term, unemployment was only 5%.
Home foreclosures were only five percent.
Obama started running for office in the fourth year of Bush's second administration.
He talked about taxing the rich.
Started running into taxing the corporations.
He talked about raising the capital gains tax.
And as a result, the rich started taking their money out of the stock market, and the stock market went down the tubes.
The corporations started laying people off.
Therefore, the employment rate skyrocketed.
And with people out of work, they could no longer pay for the homes and the loans that they had in Congress.
Nobody disputes that, but uh your your premise is that uh nobody's getting on the Democrats or Obama for blaming Bush.
And a lot of people are.
A lot of people are telling Obama, grow up!
You can't keep blaming everything on Bush.
Anyway, appreciate the call.
I got to take a brief time out here at the bottom of the hour.
Fastest three hours of media back before you know it.
By the way, has the ACLU weighed in yet on the Gainesville pastor that wants to burn the Koran?
Why not?
Uh I mean, if the ACLU be consistent, they'd move in there and defend this Gainesville pastor's right to burn the Kim.
Maybe maybe the ACLU's finally found a religious text that they they want to protect.
Who knew?
I've been watching Obama here during the break.
This is, you know, I'm for those of you watching on the Diddle Camp today, I've got to apologize.
I am I'm yawning.
I'm for some reason I'm fighting fatigue here.
And I'm watching Obama, and I almost fell asleep.
The audience is almost asleep of this speech out in Parm, Ohio.
I think you need a break.
We gotta have these middle class, Tesco, they need to be permanent.
You need a break.
Smattering applause.
Uh, it's listless, and he's attacking Boehner.
I don't think the people in the crowd care.
Anyway, we'll have audio sound bites from this.
Either those later this afternoon, probably uh probably tomorrow.
Uh even America's liberal elites concede Obama's presidency is crumbling.
It's a headline today from the UK telegraph by Niles Gardner.
Here's how it begins.
Democrats in Congress no longer asking themselves whether this is going to be a bad election year for them and their party.
They are asking whether it's going to be a disaster.
The GOP pushed deep into Democrat held territory over the summer to the point where the party is well within range of picking up the 39 seats it would need to take control of the House.
Overall, as many as 80 House seats could be at risk.
Fewer than a dozen of these are held by Republicans.
Political handicappers now say it's conceivable.
Not since 1930.
Has the House changed hands without the Senate following suit?
Is this a piece from National Review, the Weekly Standard, Wall Street Journal, Fox News.com.
All major conservative news outlets in the U.S. No, this is direct quote from yesterday's Washington Post.
Usually viewed by conservatives as a flagship of the liberal establishment inside the beltway.
Last sentence of the story.
What was once a perspective confined largely to Fox News, online conservative news sites or talk radio is now gaining ground in the liberal U.S. print media as well.
Historic change is coming to America, though not quite the version promised by Barack Obama.
And then CNN Money.com.
Obama's jobs pitch fails to dazzle Washington.
If you can't dazzle CNN anymore, you are in deep doo-doo.
I mean, that the Obama magic has got to be going.
If you can't dazzle CNN, Obama's jobs pitch fails to dazzle Washington.
So there are numerous pieces like that.
Have you heard about this German banker and his book on immigration?
You heard about this.
Politicians have run in to condemn a board member of the German central bank for a new book tackling immigration.
But his views have found considerable support among the population at large.
The guy's name is Thilo Sarizen.
His book, quote, is not convincing, but it has convinced many people, unquote, said the influential Der Spiegel magazine, which this week has the Bundesbank executive on its cover, calling him a people's hero.
His publisher is rushing to print more copies of Germany Does Itself In to meet demand.
Online retailer Amazon has a massive 207 reader reviews on its website.
The average score 4.4 stars out of a possible five.
The Social Democrats, the center-left political party that Thilo Sarazin belongs to, has been inundated with thousands of letters and emails and phone calls attacking the central bank's board's desire to get rid of him.
In the book, Thilo Sarazin says that Europe's top economy, i.e.
Germany, is being undermined, overwhelmed, and made more stupid by poorly educated, fast breeding, badly integrated, and unproductive Muslim immigrants and their offspring.
If I want to hear the Muzins call a prayer, I'll go to the Orient, he says, saying that allowing in millions of guest workers in the 60s and 70s was a gigantic error.
This is a bank official.
He's a liberal Democrat in Germany.
He says that Turkish and Kurdish clans have a long tradition of inbreeding, leading to higher rates of birth defects.
He ponders whether this might be one reason for immigrants' poor school performance.
This and his comment to a newspaper that all Jews share a certain gene is akin to the kind of pseudoscience used by the Nazis.
The Chancellor Angela Merkel called his remarks completely unacceptable.
The Bundesbank's board has asked President Christian Wolf to get rid of him, because the bank can't do it itself.
Philo Sarazin has no intention of going quietly, however.
He is threatened to appeal in the courts if he is dismissed in a show trial.
So...
But at the same time, Thilo Saracen's book has thrown the spotlight on the fact that Germany's record is poor on integrating its 15 and a half million people with what the government calls a migration background.
According to official figures, nearly one in five young people without German nationality, which many second third generation immigrants don't have, leave school with no qualification.
The bottom line is, this guy has written a book blaming Germany allowing Muslim immigrants to destroy the country.
The establishment hates the guy.
They want rid of him, but the German population can't get enough of the book.
So you've got a ruling class situation in Germany, much like you have here.
Except this guy, Philo Sarazen, would by all accounts be considered a member of the ruling class.
Here's David Nashville, Tennessee.
David, welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you on the program.
Your story about the Bibles being burned in in Iraq.
And I thought I'd call you with with some information.
Maybe you didn't didn't know, or it wasn't.
It wasn't very prevalent when it was happening.
And uh I I sent him sent him packages, and uh I figured uh a man in the army in a war zone, one thing he needed was a Bible, and I was told by the post office that D.O.D. says that you can't send him a Bible because it of host country sensibilities.
And we were in the midst of invading him.
Well, how would the host country know that your son had received a Bible?
I don't know.
That's just what I was told.
Of course, they didn't want they didn't want uh Playboys over there either, but you know, uh uh if you're invading a country, I don't see where you should worry about the the host country's sensibility.
Oh, well, we were not invading a country, you were trying to get rid of the Taliban.
Uh I'm talking about in Iraq, uh uh, not uh Afghanistan.
Oh, I thought you said Afghanistan.
No, uh, if I did, I'm sorry.
Uh it was a mistake.
It was when we were uh went in to a Oh, you weren't allowed to send Bibles to your kid in in in Iraq.
No, sir.
That's what I was told.
Because it would offend the sensibilities of the locals.
That's that was the what I was told.
Okay, well, that's still a policy from what I'm told.
Yeah, it it's stupid.
Well, uh, um I'm about to offending as many sensibilities as I can, to tell you the truth.
That's all about political correctness.
It's reared its head practically everywhere.
You know the Red Cross says that only about seven percent of us are prepared for a disaster.
Now, this is September.
September's National Preparedness Month.
Did you know that?
It is.
And Legal Zoom and the Red Cross are teaming up to help try to keep you safe.
You never know when an emergency is coming.
The Red Cross recommends storing essential emergency items like a first aid kit, blankets, emergency food, and water.
Red Cross also wants you to have an essential document to keep in your emergency kit.
Your family will, because in emergencies this document makes your wishes known.
Now, do you have a will?
You have a living trust.
Is it up to date?
Do you have a copy of it in an emergency kit?
If not, you should do it now and you can do it easily at legal zoom.
Make a will, health care directive, power of attorney, living trust in September.
LegalZoom will donate uh donate one dollar from your purchase to the Red Cross.
With legal Zoom, only takes a few minutes, and you'll have plenty of online help and assistance.
LegalZoom, not a law firm, but it was started by top attorneys to provide self-help service at your specific direction.
Go to legalzoom.com.
That's legalzoom.com.
You won't believe how easy doing these things are.
Well, Obama finally got a standing O, but I don't remember what for.
I think he's talking about how he didn't run to do easy things.
I didn't I didn't run.
Read the polls.
Oh stay in office.
Standing O. I think I just wanted him to shut up.
I think they're tired of him talking.
That's the only way they can do it.
Stand up if it's standing.
He actually says, he actually says that he is full-fledged in favor of fiscal responsibility.
And here's Dingy Harry.
Dingy Harry yesterday on ABC News.com and the Washington Post top line.
Jonathan Carl spoke with him, said, You have been relentlessly hammering your opponent with your ad.
Sharon Angle.
Outside groups have been painting her as an extremist, and yet in one of the most recent polls, your negatives were higher than hers.
Why is that?
The only poll that matters is the one on election day.
Nevada, for 20 years, led the nation as the best economy of all 50 states.
We were so high we have so far to fall.
And we're struggling to get back where we were.
We have as you know the presence created where with Congress, we've created three and a half million jobs.
We have because of what took place in the bushers, we lost eight million.
So we have a long ways to go.
But I think it would take a real stretch to think that I caused the problems with the economy.
Did anybody accuse him of that?
Harry Reed says, I didn't my fault.
Not my fault the economy's bad.
It's all it's Bush's fault.
And he is uh his numbers are negatives are higher than Sharon Angles.
Here's uh Angel, Rohoboth Beach, Delaware.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hi.
Thanks, Russ.
I really appreciate you having me on.
Um I wanted to talk about Mike Castle.
He's refusing to debate Christine O'Donnell.
We have uh we've organized a group of all the conservative people in Delaware, all the conservative groups we've tried today.
We hand the lever, hand delivered to his office.
We mailed, we sacked, I mean, it's not Facebook request to try and get him to debate her, he refuses to do it.
Well, that's not that uncommon.
I mean, uh he's in his mind, he's the incumbent and he's a member of the House, and he's got nothing to win by debating her.
But that's that's um it wouldn't just be Castle that uh that would refuse to debate.
I mean, anybody in this situation probably would, because there's nothing he can gain.
All he's gonna do is give her exposure if he does it, and he doesn't want to do that.
Well, it's it's simply a shame because he's trying to say that he's here to represent Delaware, but he refuses to meet with the people of Delaware and show us that he's the best candidate.
Well uh yeah, well, I I he probably didn't want to put that on the line.
It's better to have people think that than to see him in action and maybe question it.
Yeah, uh agree.
He he keeps insisting this is a quote.
She's not a viable candidate.
Why is that?
Does she does he why does he say, or why why is she not viable?
That one I can't tell you, but he he is insisting she's not a viable candidate.
And it seems to me like the Tea Party Express endorsement being talked about by people like you and Mark Levin.
It seems to me that makes her viable.
I well, she's on the ballot, right?
So she's viable.
I mean, she's gonna get some votes, so she's viable, right?
Agreed.
Yes, her signs are everywhere right now.
Yeah.
All right.
Well, look, Angel, thanks.
Uh thanks for the call.
Thanks for the update.
Castle refuses to debate O'Donnell in Delaware's the headline, Jay, Merritt Island, Florida.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Mr. Lembaugh, I have the greatest respect for you.
You're one of my heroes.
But you said something a few minutes ago that I do take umbrage with.
What's that?
I'm a fiscal, I am a fiscal conservative.
I am very much so.
But I couldn't care less if Mary Ellen has a baby or she has an abortion.
I don't care if Tom and Harry get married.
What I care about is Obama spending my grandchildren's money.
That's all I care about.
And I resent being called a liberal, even a hyphenated liberal, I resent.
I didn't call you that.
I didn't call you that.
Well, I heard hyphenated liberal of somebody who wasn't on the social side.
Who's a caller?
I didn't call you a hyphen liberal.
What this guy was his if you're not calling me a hyphenated liberal, I forgive you.
I no, I'm not I sorry that you misunderstood.
Uh me out.
Um, I understand where you're coming from.
You you don't want a social issues to matter.
I couldn't care less.
What does it mean to me if Harry and Tom get married?
Right.
I'm beyond that.
No, I know I know that.
But but there are some people who are just when they describe themselves as fiscal conservatives.
Yep.
Uh who also are trying to say they are pro choice, pro-abortion.
And this is what the guy was.
If they're hiding, if they're hiding behind the words, that's one thing.
That's what he was talking.
That's what he was talking about.
That's just conservative as you really have to be.
Couldn't care less.
What difference does it make what other people do with their lives?
As long as they don't affect us and don't affect us in a way that's negative, that's all.
Well, to some people it does matter, but I understand where you're coming from, particularly at this point in our country's history of the crossroads where we're at.
Uh, you know, whether Tom sleeps with Dick, uh, is really not the big thing right now.
Um what Obama's doing to destroy the country.
I nobody disagrees with you about that, but it's it's his his point was, and I don't have time to explain it, but all I can tell you is I didn't call you a hyphenated American.
No, no, not American.
No, no, no.
Hyphenated conservative.
Whatever.
I didn't I didn't use the word, it wasn't me.
Yeah, it's it's ironic to me, folks.
It's uh amazing.
A man who has such large ears could be so tone-deaf, the American people.
This speech, in which he just lost a personal vendetta here against Boehner, just going to elevate Boehner for no reason.
He's gonna is all about fixing Obama's image.
It wasn't about fixing the American economy or anything else.
It's just anyway, we'll have some sound bites from it, more comments tomorrow.
Gotta go.
▲
Export Selection