All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 6, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:42
August 6, 2010, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24 7 Podcast.
Greetings to you, music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists all across the fruited plain.
It is Friday, live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open live Friday.
Fastest week in media.
I can't believe it's already Friday, especially given the fact that the news this week was so rotten.
But here it is, and you know the rules on Friday.
Whatever you wish to talk about is pretty much what goes.
That's not the case Monday through Thursday.
For those of you new to the program, Monday through Thursday got to talk about things I care about or they don't get talked about unless Snerdley screws up and throws me a call.
And me in my politeness, I uh deal with it.
But on Friday, I broom that requirement.
And the content of the program is uh when we go to the phones, is yours.
A giant career risk.
Lovingly happily taken by me.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882, and the email address L Rushball at EIB net.com.
Rasmussen reports has a poll out.
86% of voters nationwide say there should be limits on what the federal government can do.
Now I don't 86%.
I haven't seen a poll with 86% in anything, but there already is.
It's called the United States Constitution.
The United States Constitution was written specifically and expressly to limit what the federal government can do.
Now, if this 86% thinks that we need to limit what government can do, it's obviously because they are noticing what this regime is doing, which is a positive.
But I mean, it's I don't know, a little depressing to me to hear a poll.
86% think that there should be limits on what the federal government can do when there already are.
One of the most brilliant documents ever written limits what the government can do in this Rasmussen poll.
Nine percent want no limits on what the government can do.
Nine percent.
That's when you stop and think about it.
That's the extent of support that Obama has.
It is this kind of minority that is um ruling us.
Just amazing.
Job growth remains.
Here's Obama on television.
He's economic outlook talking about all the jobs that have been created.
All of the month by month jobs that have been created because of his policies.
Uh we are we're not in a recovery, folks.
We are on life support in this country.
Now, I'm I'm okay with math.
Semi-literate with math.
Numbers are not my strong suit.
But I'm I'm having a hard time squaring a numerical loss of jobs with all this talk of weak recovery and job growth.
This headline, this is the political job growth remains weak.
What job growth?
I admit I'm weak on numbers.
But when the job numbers are the fact that 131,000 jobs were lost in July.
Where's the growth?
I don't understand.
The unemployment rate held steady at 9.5%.
It's actually 15 to 16 percent.
And everybody living life understands this.
The regime is doing everything it can to keep that number below 10.
That's that's the tipping point.
That number gets to 10 or goes over it, then they think they have a problem.
Overall, the labor department reported non-farm payroll employment fell, 131,000 in July.
The unemployment rate held steady at 9.5%.
The job losses included the elimination of 143,000 temporary census workers.
The jobs Report for June was revised sharply lower.
This is, you know, everything we were told in June about job growth was a lie.
Payrolls actually fell 221,000 during the month of June rather than the previously reported decline of 125,000.
But that's not the number they were all using.
The partisan political operative media was talking about 31,000 jobs created in June.
Remember that 31,000 jobs are created.
Didn't talk about the 125,000 that were lost, which now is 221,000.
The private sector created only 31,000 jobs in June, not the 83,000 previously reported.
So I don't I don't I'm having a tough time understanding the numerical loss of jobs with the talk of a weak recovery, or any kind of a recovery, or this political headline, job growth remains weak.
Actually, a couple of news stories here.
But if if if I'm Reuters is one, U.S. uh employment fell second straight month in July as more temporary census jobs ended while private hiring rose less than expected, pointing to an anemic economic recovery.
Employment fell two consecutive months.
How in the world can we have a weak recovery?
We don't, we're on life support.
We don't have a recovery.
I if if I were running, of course, uh news organizations, I would have said we're all mired in a slow economic decline that's being managed artfully by the regime.
But at this rate, folks, our economy is going to be weakly recovering on its way to a depression.
Job growth remains weak.
The partisan political operatives in the old media have a strange way of communicating with us.
I would have said private sector job growth remains dangerously weak given the administration's trillion dollar stimulus bill.
All the stimulus that we've had, Obama's out there today lying through his teeth about all the jobs that have been created.
How do you lose 131,000 jobs in July and still have unemployment be 9.5%?
None of these numbers make any sense whatsoever.
And we've had all the stimulus, and we've had all of these bailouts, and we're still losing jobs.
We're you know, leaking, spilling, losing, what have you.
The economy overall is continuing to shed jobs.
Now I'm all for losing public sector jobs because those are a huge drain on the private sector, but the headline headline says that political job growth remains weak.
There isn't any job growth.
There are job losses in the public sector, mild job gains in the private sector.
And I don't think we can even trust these numbers because June's being revised downward.
So what's this 131,000 going to be in August?
What are they going to tell us the 131,000 really is in 30 days?
150,000?
175,000?
Can we go ahead and guess?
The experts never know.
The experts are constantly and always shocked and surprised by this.
I mean, I'd I if it were me, you know, I'd be saying the economy is headed in the wrong direction.
Maybe I just don't get it.
Maybe I don't.
Now, as we get closer to these January tax increases, who in the world thinks that private sector job growth is going to accelerate?
We're not in a recovery.
There's no recovery whatsoever.
We are on life support.
And Pelosi is bringing back the House to spend billions of dollars we don't have on states who cannot afford their public sector workers.
The patient is dying.
The patient is not recovering.
And all we get out of this is Christina Roomer quitting.
Christina Roemer, the Council of Economic Advisors splitting the scene.
Supposedly she doesn't get along with Larry Summers.
That's the rumor out there.
Of course, why not?
Larry Summers, according to women at Harvard, hates women.
Christina Roomer is going back to her gig teaching economics at Berkeley, UC California Berkeley.
What people have forgotten about Christina Rohmer is that she has written in the past of the magic of tax rate reductions leading to economic growth.
They've had to scrub that from any website that has quoted her saying that.
And so she's gone.
Now look, look at the uh look at the headlines here.
The the uh this is this is again five headlines here.
The perception, this is all from Reuters, the perception that there is a job growth, uh, there is job growth, and an economic recovery uh is underway appears to be a myth.
This is from Todd Schoenberger, managing director Land Coal Trading.
Number two.
The foundation for employment growth occurs in promising consumer sentiment and confidence readings, both of which continue to be frighteningly low, Mr. Schoenberger said.
Today's numbers do not initiate a Fed policy move, but the overall trend does.
Number four, investors should be on high alert when Bernanke and company get together on Tuesday.
Number five, art cash and the director of floor operations, UBS Financial Services, said on CNBC that he thinks July's employment figures could dim prospects for the stock market.
We may be getting ready to put a top on this summer rally here.
So that's a Reuters story.
Futures fall sharply after jobs report.
And the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down 136 right now, 136 and a half.
The perception that there is job growth and an economic recovery underway appears to be a myth, said Tom Schoenberger, managing director to land cold trading, Reuters went out and found this guy.
Here's more to Jolt Economy.
In fact, I want to go back to the past is what we've done here.
Gone back and gotten news stories from the past that highlight Obama's promises and bite me's promises.
Stimulating the economic recovery.
This is a story from U.S. News and World Report that ran December 9, 2008.
To jolt economy, Obama and Congress eye billions in infrastructure spending.
Number two, stimulus jolt.
Obama promises 600,000 jobs in 100 days.
LA Times, June 8th, 2009, a little over a year ago.
Number three, experts, economic stimulus plan would be a short-term shot in the arm.
February 11, 2008.
Sarah Lockyer, some website.
Number four, politics today, a new stimulus jolt.
September 30th, 2009.
That's CBS News.
That's all stuff in the past.
Obama's stimulus and all of the uh infrastructure spending was gonna was gonna jolt the economy and promise 600,000 jobs in a hundred days.
And Biden's out there saying, we're gonna be, by this time, producing 500,000 jobs a month.
Now we're in the summer of recovery.
We're halfway through it, and we're not recovering, we're on life support.
We go back and we look at what all of these people said.
Biden, Obama, others in the media promising all this great stuff as a result of the stimulus spending.
Let's move to the present.
Stephen Dynamon, Washington Times, Social Security in the red this year.
Social Security will pay out more this year than it gets in payroll taxes, marking the first time since the program will be in the red since it was overhauled in 1983, according to the annual authoritative report released yesterday by the program's actuary.
I don't care where you look, and I'm not trying to be a downer here, but we have to call these people out when they make things up about an economic recovery and how things are going, and if how bad would it be if we hadn't done what we've done?
And now Obama is out using Bush's name, is using his name, not just talking about his predecessor, but he's actually criticizing Bush by name on a number of things.
So I hate I hate to sit here and tell you the truth about things.
But you have to know it.
I'm sure most of you do.
And it isn't being reported.
Now Obama went to all these autofactories.
He went to Ford, he went to General Motors.
I wonder if he'll be talking to the employees at these places.
Postal Service loses three and a half billion dollars concerned with future liquidity.
Will Obama show up and give them a pep talk?
Fannie Mae seeks one and a half billion dollars from the Treasury after its twelfth straight loss.
Fannie Mae, another bailout needed.
After twelve straight losses.
Will Obama go over to Fannie Mae, talk to the employees at these places.
Give them a pep talk.
We'll be back.
Quick time out.
It's open line Friday, so we'll probably get to your phone calls a little earlier than usual.
That means we'll probably get to a couple in this hour.
It's exciting.
Stand by.
Hang in there.
Be tough.
How long will it be, uh, ladies and gentlemen, before Carl Rove has his own radio talk show?
It is a valid question because Carl Rove is going to be the guest host on Monday of this program.
I have to uh I'm gonna be out way late on the left coast on Sunday.
Impractical to get back here in time for the busy broadcast on Monday, so we've asked Carl Rove to come in.
Almost everybody who has guest hosted this program ends up with their own show.
So I wonder how long it'll be before Carl has his.
The uh the state-controlled media are just obsessed with Carl Rove, guest hosting this program.
We have uh John King's CNN last night.
Panel discussion.
The guest host was Jessica Yellen.
Former Bush Cheney advisor Robert Trainum, Gloria Borger, Don Baer, all these people talking about Rove doing this program on Monday.
Jessica Yellen says, Carl Rove gonna be uh back to work in a new role for a day.
Uh George Bush's go-to guy in politics will be fill in for Rush Limbaugh radio show next Monday.
Robert, is this a new career for Carl Rove?
Possibly.
You know, he does have a face for radio.
There's no question about it.
He's in trouble for saying that.
Well, Carl's a friend, but there's no reason why.
I mean, there's no surprise here.
Carl Rove is a conservative, obviously Rush Limbaugh is a conservative, and what better way to have a former presidential spokesperson slash advisor talking about how bad the Democrats are doing right now in the context of the Rush Limbaugh, you know, with his 12 million or so listeners.
It's gonna be the kinder, gentler Rush Limbaugh show.
Uh, really.
It's August.
You know, why does this surprise anyone, though?
You know, Carl's out there, he's looking for things to do.
It's perfectly fine thing for him to do.
Absolutely.
It worked for Rush.
It could be a good new career for him, huh?
Worked for me.
Who did I sit in for?
I was never a guest host for anybody.
Works for me.
No, she said it worked.
My trend it worked.
That's what the transcript says.
It worked for Rush.
Anyway, uh, they still can't get it right.
It's 20 to 25 million uh people.
But you see, they're obsessed.
Rove.
Carl Rove, guest hosting the program.
In fact, he was on with Greta Van Susterin last night.
And Van Susterin said, Tell us what you're doing on Monday.
I'm uh sitting in for Rush Limbaugh.
Ever done radio before life been the anchor?
No.
Never?
No, never does.
How many hours is are you gonna be on?
Ten gazillion hours.
A lifetime.
Do you have a guess?
They haven't told me yet.
So I mean I think they're trying to keep me fresh and on my toes and ready to go.
Do you know how bad is if you don't make guess and you're not like ready for it?
That's like I know.
I'm reading every newspaper I can.
I'm racking my brains and you know, eating healthy, drinking lots of fluids and hopefully.
Well, no, don't make a lot of fluids because you don't know if you can get up that often.
Well, I'm doing it in advance, keeping my brain lubricated.
Um, you know what, you know, you need to do it here's a hint, though, is that uh make phone calls.
I mean, like if you get into like a dry spot, make a phone call to somebody.
Take some callers, take some callers.
Yeah, take calls.
So the uh media here is uh is obsessing with Carl Rove guest hosting the program.
We haven't told him whether Or not we have any guests for him on Monday.
What do you you guys know anything about this?
We don't we don't do guests.
He no, but he if he wants to have guests, he can bring them in here, but we don't.
I mean, the guest host comes in here and the guest host flies on his or her own.
Right.
So uh Carl, whatever you want to do, pal, is uh is fun.
If you want us to get some guests, I imagine we could do it.
It's a big deal, snurtly, because they hate Rove.
It is a big deal because they hate me.
It is a big deal because it's an even bigger microphone and forum for Rove.
That's why it's a big deal.
It is another step in what they see as the expansion of the opposition media.
Remember, these people wanted Rove in jail, and now where is he?
He's behind a golden EIB microphone.
With that, they hate every aspect of this.
This won't fly with them.
Carl Ralph guest hosting this program on Monday.
Carl will finally have some real power.
Uh now that he is behind the golden EIB microphone.
Should be uh should be interesting.
Our telephone number is 800-282-2882 if you want to be on the program.
Sticking with uh CNN for a moment.
This is Obama yesterday in Chicago at a campaign event for Illinois Senate candidate Alex Gianulius.
And here's a portion of what the BAMster had to say.
They haven't come out with a single solitary idea that is different from the policies that held sway for eight years before Democrats took over.
Not a single policy difference that's discernible from George W. Bush.
Not one.
So what they're really betting on is amnesia.
They're betting that you didn't notice that the recession started under their watch.
So that's that's that's really uplifting.
I mean, that's a way to get somebody to vote for your guy.
George W. Bush, the architect of the recession.
They're betting you didn't notice the recession started under their watch.
Who's made it worse?
What everybody knows is that the Democrats have made it worse when the president says we can't go back, we can't go back, we can't give the keys to the car to people that wrecked it the last time.
We want to go back.
If we could go back a year and a half, my God, do you realize the change in mood, the optimism that it would exist in this country?
Barack Obama is doing everything in his power to recreate the new deal.
The Franklin Delama Roosevelt.
And he says it's a Republicans who want to go back to old ideas that failed.
And he's doubling down on the new deal.
He've always believed that the reason the new deal really did not get us out of the depression was that not enough money was spent.
Obama really believes that.
And of course, the only thing that got us out of the depression was World War II.
The new deal had nothing to do with it.
But here's Obama trying to recreate the new deal, Marxism, Leninism, all of this sort of stuff, and he accuses the Republicans of wanting to go back to old ideas that failed.
Wolf Blitzer, not sure about this strategy of mentioning Bush's name.
That's pretty unusual for him to name the former president directly in this criticism.
Usually it's implied, but to specifically name George W. Bush, that's significant.
You're going to be shocked to hear this, Wolf, but they've actually been looking at polls.
If you ask if you would vote for a Republican who supports George W. Bush's economic policies, the voters overwhelmingly say no.
So that is why they're invoking George W. Bush's name again.
Let them go ahead and take these phony polls and lie to themselves about it, but I don't think there are very many people who are going to associate the economic life support that we're on now with George W. Bush.
This regime has had two years to deal with it.
The regime is lying to the American people about all the success their policies are having.
Tax increases are due to hit in January.
People cannot find work.
The people who do have work cannot Get raises, salary increases.
They're not uh they're not secure in in any number of ways.
And if if these people think that they can run against George W. Bush and have Democrats win, go for it.
Go for it.
That's the that's the single biggest indication of just how stupid they think every one of us happens to be.
Obama inherited a deficit that he voted for.
He inherited.
In fact, he insisted on it.
There wasn't one vote that he disagreed with.
Was it one plan he disagreed?
He voted for every aspect of legislation that led to this current economy.
He voted to expand the deficit fourfold since January 20th.
He never opposed anything of what Bush was doing.
He was always of the mind it wasn't enough.
Now, if if the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the fiscal year 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets.
Now that deficit in 2007, fiscal year 2007, was the lowest deficit in five years.
The fourth straight decline in deficit spending.
After that, the Democrats in Congress took control of spending.
They took control in 2007.
And that includes Obama who voted for all of the budgets that Bush put forth.
He voted for every budget that busted whatever.
He cannot say he opposed it.
He cannot say he differed from it.
He didn't, he cannot say he warned everybody.
He was right in there.
He voted for every one of those budgets.
So if he inherited anything, he inherited from himself.
Because he was right there.
His only complaint during the Bush administration was that they weren't spending enough.
So I urge them.
I urge the regime.
You go ahead and you go to try you you try to make the current economic circumstances Bush's.
You go ahead.
The people of this country know the Republicans are not in power.
They can't do anything, can't stop anything, can't make anything happen.
I mean, this is uh one-party rule.
The American people, 86% think there ought to be limits on government.
There isn't any polling data that shows Obama in a good light in any way, shape, manner, or form.
So I don't know who's lying to him of these internal polls, but I hope they keep it up.
As you heard Wolf Blitzer not convinced that it's a good move politically for Obama to mention Bush by name, but Gloria Borger, um, she says she's down with it.
Isn't there normally a little protocol that a sitting president does not necessarily hammer his immediate predecessor, that that other aides do that, of course, but that's sort of above what the president of the United States should be, or below what the president should be.
There may be, but it certainly worked for Barack Obama in 2008 pretty well.
He wasn't a sitting president, right?
But using George W. Bush work.
So Gloria Borger, totally in the tank, it's a partisan political operative disguised as a journalist.
The smartest thing she ever did was get out of Newsweek, which is where she used to be.
I think maybe it was U.S. News and World Report.
I um I can't.
Let him go ahead, let him invoke Bush all he wants.
George W. Bush had 52 straight months of job creation.
You let him invoke Bush all he wants, we will invoke Obama.
That'll be the simplest sell.
He wants to run against Bush, fine.
What he knows, what his regime knows, is that everybody's gonna be running against them.
Quick timeout, much more straight ahead, open line Friday.
Yell Rushball back after this.
Gloria Borger, Wolf Blitzer, all of you in the partisan political operative media, you think it's great, you think it makes sense.
Well, Wolf doesn't, but Gloria Borger does.
Great politics.
For Obama to personally invoke the name George W. Bush, Miss Borger, Mrs. Borger, whatever it is.
How many congressional districts and states must Obama avoid Because he is so politically poisonous.
How many places does Obama go where Democrats don't want to be anywhere near him?
He goes to Georgia, Democrats in Georgia don't want to be anywhere near him.
Who is it that is radioactive, Ms. Borger?
He keeps going to the same places.
He goes to California, he goes to Detroit, and he goes to Chicago.
Sometimes he goes to New York.
Those are the places he goes.
When is the last time Barack Obama went to a border state to campaign for a candidate?
When is the last time Barack Obama went to a southern state to campaign for a candidate?
When he went to New Jersey to help John Corzine, Corzine got whipped when he went to Massachusetts to help Cochle.
She got creamed.
Obama is in no position to talk down anybody.
He did not help anybody in Virginia.
The Republicans won that state house as well.
59% of the public think Obama is performing very poorly in Gallup 41% approval when Bush was at 41%.
You headlined it for three weeks.
59% of the public thinks that Obama's performing very poorly.
He cannot pull anybody across the finish line.
Democrats do not want him to appear with them anywhere they're up for re-election, other than California or Chicago or Detroit.
And you think you're going to sail to victory invoking the name George W. Bush?
What our candidates are going to do, Ms. Borger, our candidates are going to campaign all across the country invoking Obama's name.
They're going to be talking about 19 months of Obama.
19 months of failed promises, 19 months of failed policy, 19 months of lying, unemployment, foreclosures, business failures, reckless spending, massive government, all of it is owned by Barack Obama.
In Obama's world, going forward means driving off the cliff.
And 59% of the American people know it.
The vast majority of the people don't want his health care bill.
They want it repealed.
This judge out in California has created more angst and animosity for government.
It continues to build, Ms. Borger.
The American people are not enamored of government anymore.
And they certainly are not enamored of Obama.
The C's are not lowering.
The dreaded oil spill did not become dreaded.
Why don't we see any polls asking who's more popular?
Ms. Borger, Obama, or Bush?
I mean, I'm sure if if your polling data or if Obama's polling data that you cite, which says running against Bush is a winner, where are these polls?
You know that your buds in the partisan political operative media would put those poll numbers out.
George W. Bush isn't going to be on the ballot.
But the Democrats who have controlled Congress since 2007, January, they're going to be on the ballot.
The Democrats who talked down the economy, the Democrats who wanted this recession, the Democrats who wanted defeat in Iraq, the Democrats who gave us this recession just so they get control of Congress in the White House, they are on the ballot.
George W. Bush is not.
Let's take just one example.
Public policy polling found that more people in Louisiana approve of Bush's handling of Katrina versus Obama's handling of the BP oil spill.
Public policy polling is a liberal Democrat polling outfit out of North Carolina.
Where are these polls?
Ms. Borger and the rest of you in the state-controlled media.
Thank you.
That show us running against Bush is a win-win.
If that's the case, How come the Democrats are lagging way behind in the generic ballot?
If the American people are still blaming George W. Bush for all of this, how come it is that the Democrats expect to lose control of the House of Representatives?
Hmm?
You just make it up.
You just make it up.
You are so slavish in your idolatrous support of Obama that whatever he does has to be miraculously wonderful, brilliant, and so forth.
But where's the evidence?
Where are the facts?
Where are the facts?
The American people hate Bush.
You know, I there are billboards all over the country with Bush's picture on them, say, Miss Me Yet.
I haven't seen the re-elect Obama billboards.
I haven't seen little kids singing Obama's praise songs lately.
They might still be doing it.
I don't, I don't see this massive overwhelming hatred for George W. Bush.
But the Democrats who talked down the economy, they're in trouble, and they know they're in trouble, and they don't want Obama anywhere near them.
Here's Obama this afternoon at Gelberg Signs speaking about this in Washington, speaking about the economy.
This is the leader of the regime lying.
Just plain lying.
The road to recovery doesn't follow a straight line.
The Department of Labor released its monthly jobs report showing that July marked the seventh straight month of job creation in the private sector.
We've now added private sector jobs every month this year instead of losing them, as we did for the first seven months of last year.
And that's a good sign.
What?
That's a tepid bunch of applause.
We lost 131,000 jobs in July, and in June, the figures were revised downward to over 200,000 jobs lost.
And the man actually says the Department of Labor released its monthly jobs report showing July marked the seventh straight month of job creation in the private sector.
We're at 131,000 jobs down.
Unemployment is at 9.5%.
And we're creating jobs.
We got a recovery going on.
We don't.
We are on the life support.
Here's more Obama.
Our manufacturing sector that's been hit hard for as long as folks can remember, has actually added 183,000 jobs so far this year.
Really?
That's the most robust seven months of manufacturing growth in over a decade.
Really?
Just this morning there was a report about the growing trend of manufacturing plants returning to the United States from overseas instead of the other way around.
Really?
All three U.S. automakers are now posting a profit for the first time since 2004.
And since they emerged from bankruptcy, the auto industry as a whole has added 76,000 jobs.
So there's some good trends out there.
I mean, this is all made up.
That that is all made up.
This road to recovery is a U-turn.
There is no recovery.
I mean, this is just blatant lying.
And you wait till health care kicks in.
When taxes actually go up, when energy actually becomes more expensive and less available.
When the real effects of the monstrosity that is the Obama regime and this Congress take effect.
The name Barack Obama will be worse than the name of Herbert Hoover.
Hooverville's we got Obamavilles.
He says that jobs have been created every month this year.
We should all be celebrating, right?
Trillions of dollars in deficit spending, Obama believes 9.5% unemployment's a great success.
Okay, Democrats, go run on that.
Obama's telling you how to campaign.
You go out there and run while we're on a road to recovery.
All these brand new private sector jobs, it's worth throwing a party.
We should all be celebrating.
I'm sure the media can find all the celebrations.
I'm sure the media will be able to find all the pockets in the country where people are really feeling good about the country all of a sudden.
And they'll be able to do news stories on that, right?
And the Democrats can run on all of this new hiring and all the excitement.
All of the good vibes, the economic Recovery.
He's out there praising himself for 9.5% unemployment, praising himself for foreclosures and bankruptcies.
So here's the deal.
If you like where the economy is and you want more of it, then it's very simple.
Vote Democrat.
Back after this, stay with us.
We ought to break out the tune.
Happy Days Are Here Again.
Obama's out there singing the praises of his economic recovery.
Happy days here again.
Can you imagine the party we're going to have when unemployment gets up to 10% from the current 9.5% patting himself?
Can you imagine how it's going to look seeing him pat himself on the back for that achievement?
Whoa, can't wait.
▲
Export Selection