I can tell by the look on the faces of my staff that they do not believe me when I say the NAACP was founded primarily by three white people.
By the way, the three white people who founded the NAACP were people of property.
Which is how Obama described the founders of this country as people of property.
Of course, what Obama meant when he said that the founders are people of property and wealth.
He just meant they were a bunch of white guys, rich white guys who got ticked off about having to pay their taxes.
And that's why they wanted independence in the first place.
That's that's what Obama thinks.
It goes all the way back to the founding bunch of rich white guys, a bunch of slave owners, and they didn't like paying taxes on tea, so they founded a country.
That's who founded the country.
Greetings, my friends.
L. Rushball behind the golden EIB microphone, telephone number 800-282-2882, the email address L. Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
The race riot of 1908 in the hometown of Abraham Lincoln, Springfield, Illinois, had highlighted the urgent need for an effective civil rights organization in the U.S. It is written here.
This event is often cited as the catalyst for the formation of the NAACP.
Mary White Ofington.
Journalist William English Walling and Henry Moskowitz met in New York City in January of 1909, and the NAACP was born.
Solicitations for support went out to more than 60 prominent Americans, and a meeting date was set for February 12th, 1909.
This was intended to coincide with the 100th anniversary of the birth of President Lincoln, who emancipated enslaved African Americans while the meeting did not take place until three months later.
This date, February 12th, 1909, is the date often cited as the founding date of the organization.
And the people who showed up on that date consisted of W. E. B. Du Bois, Ida Wells, Archibald Grimke, Henry Moskowitz, Mary White Ovington, Oswald Garrison Villard, William English Walling, the last son of a former slave holding family, and Florence Kelly, a social reformer and friend of Du Bois, and they were majority white, and they were people of property.
And they were all socialists.
They were all agitators.
The White House has denied that the NASA spokesman was told that his primary.
Well, the NASA head was told his primary job was an outreach program to Muslims.
Yeah, uh I I guess.
I guess the guy just made it up.
Is that is that right?
The uh I the uh uh the guy the guy running NASA uh j uh uh it uh it's off the reservation.
I mean he just made it up out there.
The White House says, no, no, no, no.
That's that's we're we're we're gonna deny that.
That that's that's not what NASA's for.
So another low-ranking member of the regime thrown under the bus or thrown overboard.
Small business grew more pessimistic about their economic outlook in June in the face of weak sales and political uncertainty, according to the National Federation of Independent Businesses.
The NFIB's monthly survey of members showed the small business optimism index fell by 3.2 points in June, dipping to 89 after posting several months of gains.
Very few small business plans uh include new hires.
According to respondents, a survey showed that only 10% of firms plan new hiring.
What's surprising about this?
Of course they're pessimistic.
The Washington Post in two different polls today tells us this.
Obama's killing them!
I gotta We got a brand new health care tax law, tax law here, tax law here, we've got moratoriums on drilling in the Gulf.
Even Democrat members of Congress are trying to fight that now.
The drilling moratorium.
Why isn't Salazar held in contempt of court?
Federal government announced Monday it's issuing a new order to suspend deep water drilling in the Gulf and off the coast of California until as late as November 30th.
I guess these jobs are not even worth saving.
I guess these oil rig jobs, as far as the regime is concerned, are not even worth saving.
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said the NASA administrator Charles Bolton must have misspoken when he told Al Jazeera last month that one of his top priorities is to reach out to Muslim countries.
Gibbs said yesterday that the NASA administrator must have misspoken.
That was not his task, and that's not the task of NASA.
Bolden, though, said last month in the interview that it was Obama who gave him that task.
And he made a similar claim in February.
The White House also backed up Bolton last week when his remarks first stirred controversy.
White House spokesman last Tuesday said Obama wants NASA to engage with the world's best scientists.
And that to meet that challenge they must partner with Muslim countries.
NASA last week walked back Bolden's claim that Muslim outreach was the perhaps foremost plank of now.
Wait a minute.
Bolden goes on Al Jazeera twice February and last week says, Yep, I'm here.
My primary gig is to reach out to Muslims.
Last week the White House, some spokesman backs it up.
Yesterday, Gibson no, no, no, he misspoke.
What are we to believe?
He just made it up.
Michelle My Bell tells blacks to increase intensity.
At the NAA LCP convention, Michelle Obama tells blacks to increase intensity.
Jeremiah Wright was her pastor too.
Let us not forget she sat in the pew at that church next to her husband and with her children for twenty years.
Michelle My Bell Obama listened to the sermons of Jeremiah Wright.
What does this mean when you tell blacks to increase intensity?
Is she talking to the new Black Panthers?
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
This is the soundbite in question yesterday in Kansas City at the NAA LCP convention.
When stubborn inequality still persists in education and health in income and wealth, I think those founders would urge us to increase our intensity and to increase our discipline and our focus and keep fighting for a better future for our children and our grandchildren.
Man, I I the founders, again, I point out with a smile on my face, were white socialists, and people of property.
We need to increase our focus, our intensity, our discipline, to keep fighting for a better future for our children.
Everybody's doing that, and it's just been made tougher because of your husband's election.
I want to know who the opponent is here.
This is something it needs, it's a great question.
When stubborn inequalities still persist, how can that be?
You just got elected first lady.
When stubborn inequalities persist in education, health, income, and wealth.
I think those founders, the three white people at founded NAACP, would urge us to increase our intensity, to increase our discipline, our focus, keep fighting for a better future for our children.
Who's who's the enemy here?
Who's the opponent?
Who is the opponent that Ms. Obama refers to here?
The founders of the country were rebelling against the king.
Now to Barack Obama, the founders is a bunch of white guys, rich white guys, who had land and property, and he didn't like being taxed by the king.
So they said to hell with this, we're going to form our own country where we don't pay any taxes.
That's how Obama views the founding of the country.
Okay, who is the opponent here?
Ms. Obama, who is it against whom you must ratchet up intensity and focus and discipline?
Who is it?
Mrs. Obama, who is denying a better future for your children and grandchildren?
Who has their boot on the necks of your children or grandchildren?
Name this person.
Or name these people.
Who is it?
Refusing to permit your children and grandchildren a better future.
Against whom must this new intensity be waged?
We'll be right back.
Don't go away.
Aren't most of us uh, well, I should say, at this point in time, aren't most of you working for a better future for your children and your grandchildren?
Why?
Is that something exclusive to uh specific groups of Americans, or are we all not doing that?
And who and who in fact has made it more difficult?
Who has put more obstacles in the way of all of those of you who work for a better future for your children and grandchildren?
I would say it's Mrs. Obama's husband and his regime.
One more sound bite from Miss Obama before we go to the phones.
Also from the NAA LCP convention yesterday.
How about replacing all of that soda and those sugary drinks with water?
Kids won't like it at first, trust me.
But they'll grow to like it.
Or deciding that they don't get dessert with every meal.
As I tell my kids dessert is not a right, or they don't get it every day.
Or just being more thoughtful about how we prepare our food.
Baking instead of frying.
I know.
Don't shoot me.
And cutting back on those portion sizes.
So after Michelle My Bell gets through trashing America, she then starts telling everybody what to eat.
Dessert is not a right.
It's also none of your business.
It's none of your business whether people bake.
Okay.
Or whether people fry.
Or feed their kids dessert.
And what are you doing telling people anyway?
Haven't you already decided parents are no good at this?
And you're gonna start feeding everybody at school all day, every day, 365.
What's the difference?
Don't let them drink soda, drink water, they'll like it, they may not like it at first.
Look, folks, I understand the role of parents here.
But Michelle, my bell is not your mother.
And certainly not mine, and she's not your kid's mother, and she's she's not your kid's grandmother.
I remember when I was my brother and I were very young, might have been nine or ten, could have been eleven or twelve, I'm not sure, but we were young.
We were both huge baseball fans growing up in Cape Girardeau, Missouri.
We go up to St. Louis, they would parents would take us to a Cardinals baseball game, and on rare occasions, we would go to Stan Museel's restaurant.
Stan Museel and Biggie.
I remember one year we went before spring training started.
It was sometime in February.
My dad had to be up there for a business meeting, so he took the family to Stan Museum and Biggies.
And Stan Museel was there.
And he walked through the restaurant, came by, we said hello, and asked him when the spring training games would start being broadcast on the radio.
He said March 12th.
They had not yet gone to St. Petersburg, which is where the Cardinals trained then.
Then my brother and I ordered hamburgers, they brought the hamburger out.
And I bit into it, it had a lot of pepper in it, much more pepper than I liked.
So I said to my mother, I said, you know, this is got too much pepper in it.
Now, my mother, knowing of my profound respect and idolatry, Stam Museal, did not want me thinking ill of Stan Museel.
So she said to me, and I've always thought that this was really brilliant.
She said to me, he knows you'll like it this way when you get older.
As though Museel personally was in charge of the amount of pepper in the burger.
And even though you don't like it now, when you become an adult, he knows this is how you'll that's how she was making sure I didn't get mad at Stan the Man.
Which I thought, I looked back, and I didn't at the time realize it.
I thought she was full of beans.
Uh, but as I got older and looked back on it, now that that's the kind of of parental eating advice.
I would have never forgotten it.
And it was she said, don't eat the burgers.
She said, and we didn't send it back and and get a different one.
She said, No, this is the way he prepares it.
You should eat it this way.
Because this is the way he knows you're going to like it when you become an adult.
But there's no way my mother would have gotten up and walked.
I do.
I do.
Well, you know, of course, as we age, our taste buds dull.
But yeah, absolutely, she was right.
I do like more pepper in a burger than I did when I was a child.
But my mother would no more get up in that restaurant or anybody else's restaurant, run around at every table and preach to people what they were eating.
You know that that apple pie, that's not a right.
It's none of your business.
She would not do that.
But yo, these people, in effect, do the same thing.
They get up in conventions and they start legislating the mayor of New York or whoever, what we can and can't eat.
When it's none of their business.
Samantha in Cincinnati, your first as we start on the phones today on the EIB network.
Great to have you here.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
It's a pleasure to talk with you today.
Thank you.
Uh, you know, I wanted to mention um, I had a comment about Michelle Obama's comments um to the NAACP.
You know, the gall and ignorance of this woman who gets up and talks about crumbling schools, equality in education.
You're right, Rush.
She need look no further than her husband to see who's got their boot on the necks of her kids and grandkids.
Absolutely.
Obama, his administration, and this Democrat Congress refused to reauthorize and fund the DC voucher scholarship program that was not only an overwhelming success, uh, but save taxpayers millions, and instead, they refused to reauthorize the program, enslaving these children back to the NEA plantation that is DC public schools.
You know, that's a great I'm that's a great point because these were minority students, and their parents wanted to send their kids to Sidwell Friends and other private schools like this.
The vouchers paid for it, their test scores were through the roof, the education experience was something they enjoyed, the parents are proud of it, and Obama killed it.
Precisely for the reason that you say he had to be loyal to the unions.
Well, you know, Rush, I I tell you, the race discussion here in America is it's getting to a to a tipping point because like you, Rush, I was never wired to think about race or consider race in any given situation.
But never in my life has it been thrown up in my face than it has over the last two, three years.
And I'm tired of it.
I hear liberals call shows, your show, they talk about Jim Crow laws, they talk about slavery.
Do they understand Rush?
I think they went to the same schools, I think they went to DC schools.
Do they understand that it was Republicans that repealed laws like the Fugitive Slave Act?
Do they understand history?
No wonder Obama wants to keep them enslaved, so he can keep them stupid and slaves to the National Education Association.
Vouchers and competition and school choice give us equality in education, nothing else.
Brilliantly stated, all they want to do is complain.
All they want to do is have the argument.
All they want to do is continue to paint the picture of inequality.
What Michelle Obama's purpose there was was agitating that crowd.
The last thing that Michelle wants or Jesse Jackson wants or Sharpton wants is a happy constituency.
The last thing they want is people thinking the battle has been won.
The last thing they want is people looking at the future brightly in the era of race.
people ought to ask themselves, all this was supposed to end.
We've now crossed a major threshold and milestone.
We have the first African American president in the nation's history.
Why?
Is there so much rancor?
On the left about this.
You don't hear anybody on the right complaining about the racial makeup of this administration.
You don't hear anybody make they're talking, we're all talking about policies.
Be it Eric Holders or the NASA guy or the budget people, or Obama himself, we're focused on the destructive policies.
The color of their skin doesn't matter.
But the color of skin is the focal point of everybody on the left.
Why are they not happy by this?
Why have they not been made happy by the stunning achievement, the milestone that's been reached?
The answer answers itself.
Question answers itself.
It is happiness isn't the objective.
Contentment, neither.
Some of the finest bumper music in all of media.
Rush Limbaugh, the excellence in broadcasting network, this also the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
It is the largest free education institution in the free or oppressed worlds.
There are no graduates and there are no degrees because the learning never stops.
This is Vinny.
Always love it when they get a guy from the Bronx named Vinny on the phone.
Vinny, welcome to the program.
Thank you, great ones.
Great to listen to you every day.
Thank you very much.
It uh really doesn't surprise me in the least that uh Michelle Obama would say the things that she's saying at the NAACP.
Uh racism uh above all, and you've said this many times, is a business to certain people.
And to pay off his power.
Uh Rush, this is what decades of liberalism and a hyphenated society creates.
A so-called majority made up of so-called minority victims that relish that very role.
Then this is nothing more than Obama queuing up the vote in November, plain and simple.
Exactly.
He is you know what he's doing, he's stirring up anger.
And and it you know, it came out, Vinny, during the uh confirmation hearings for Sonia Sotomayor, that one of the things that animated her during her education period was she was angry.
She was angry at Princeton, just like Michelle My Bell was angry.
They were angry when they used their anger, even if they had to fake it.
They used their anger to get what they wanted to express their dissatisfaction with the system, and they're trying to stoke that very same anger.
Obama said in his one of his books that one of his great regrets was that he missed the civil rights movement.
Well, he's trying to recreate it apparently.
You know, Rush, like you last call on I really take no joy in saying this, but the anger I feel at this time in my life, in what's going on in this country, it cannot be understated, but that anger has really,
in fact, turned into a time of desperation for me, especially as November looms, and I suspect millions of others who feel as I do that this is our one and only chance possibly to rest our country back from what from what we see happening before our very eyes.
I don't think you're alone at all.
I think uh not that you said you are, but I'm in fact I think a lot of Americans uh share the same emotional frustration and anxiety, and a lot of people do have anger.
They don't like this.
Nobody wants to sit around and see their country torn apart.
However, economically, spiritually, racially, nobody wants to see this.
And yet here it is happening.
Harry Reid today, Harry Reid, let me get the story out of the Harry Reid said that he he wants I wish Obama were more confrontational with the GOP.
He told the Las Vegas Sons uh Joe Ralston, John Ralston last uh last Friday.
I think on many occasions, I shouldn't say in many a few occasions, I think he should have been more firm with those on the other side.
He's a person who doesn't like confrontation, he's a peacemaker, and sometimes I think you have to be a little bit more forceful, and sometimes I don't think Obama is forceful enough with the Republic.
Now, what's the point?
The Republicans have no power anywhere.
Uh the regime's had all the votes they need to get whatever they wanted.
This is about free speech.
He wants Obama to shut these people up.
That's what he wants.
You still there, Vinny, or we'll lose you in that phone melt.
Well, I wonder what the hell happened there.
That was a that was a genuine full melt.
You heard that?
Imagine what it sounded like to you, given what it sounded like to me.
Vinny, thanks for the call.
Appreciate it.
Live from the Gulf.
This is the Heritage Foundation website, Heritage.org.
Obama team blocks media from oil spill, right out of a novel.
If the news cannot be spun your way, you simply do not allow the news to be reported.
And that is the regime's position with the news coming out of the Gulf.
Last week, CNN's Anderson Cooper 122 reported that the federal government was blocking media access to coastal areas around the Gulf, preventing the media from taking photos and reporting on environmental damage of the oil spill.
You can watch the video, and you can see Cooper is livid that the administration's treating him and his colleagues this way.
Cooper, of course, compares this to Katrina when media were blocked from well, uh well, we're unsure what the media were blocked from in Katrina.
But anyway, two real stories here.
And we do appreciate that's the heritage we're writing here.
This is Rory Cooper.
Uh we do appreciate Anderson Cooper bringing one of them to light.
The media should of course not be blocked by the federal government from safely reporting on the spill and its effects.
The images of oil soaked pelicans, turtles, tarballs, destroyed marshes, achieve one important goal to remind Americans of the disaster the federal government is ignoring.
But there's a second story.
The second story is that while national reporters are fighting the regime's lack of transparency, they are not reporting it.
They are not reporting the Obama regime's lack of competence.
Every minute, a correspondent scoop a dives into the Gulf to reveal that oil is murky or an anchor shows you another tarball, we miss out on real journalistic oversight.
The regime is making catastrophic decisions every day that crippling the Gulf Coast environment and economy, yet this story is not being told.
A team of experts from the Heritage Foundation without any credentials were able to move along the coast unfettered, interview officials, fishermen, port workers, and experts to discover major mistakes being made in the response efforts.
These stories do not require a pristine camera shot, but rather some old-fashioned investigating.
Yeah, the story that the White House is engaging in a cover-up mentality is important, as the Louisville courier journal reported.
The National Press Photographers Association sent a letter to Obama expressing outrage at the new rules and requesting that he rescend them.
AFTRA, the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, a union that includes broadcast journalists, is monitoring reports of denial of access and censorship.
It's happening all over the place.
And this from Newsbusters.com.
Effectively reporting on the Gulf oil spill is now a Class D felony, punishable by a fine of up to 40,000.
That's right, the most transparent administration in history has made it a felony effective July 1st to get within 65 feet of what the Coast Guard determines are essential recovery efforts.
According to Anderson Cooper 192, officials tried to up that number to 300 feet.
Cooper, who claimed federal officials prevented CNN on two occasions from taking pictures in the Gulf, seemed frustrated when he reported on the new laws the day he they went into effect.
The press isn't the enemy here, he pleaded.
The new policies he said make it very easy to hide failure and hide incompetence.
And then Anderson Cooper let loose this zinger.
Transparency is apparently not a priority with Thad Allen these days.
Well, Thad Allen is Obama.
Cooper issued a heartfelt call for more press transparency.
But even so, it is not happening.
The media is not picking it up.
Anderson Cooper 219 is all alone in this.
He's being supported by conservative media people and think tanks.
But the rest of the state control media is silent because there's no desire to report on the incompetence of the regime when it comes to the Gulf Oil spill.
Be right back after this.
We've been talking about race today, not because we brought it up, but because the left keeps bringing it up.
And I have a story, this is from the uh French news agency.
And I'm just I'm just going to read this story as it's printed.
No editorial comment whatsoever.
Headline reads, Belly Buttons, key to success in sport.
Study.
Scientists have found.
The reason why blacks dominate on the running track and whites in the swimming pool, it's in their belly buttons.
A study published yesterday shows.
What's important is not whether an athlete has an innie or an outy, but where his or her navel is in relation to the rest of the body.
This, according to the study published in the International Journal of Design and Nature and Eco Dynamics.
The navel is the center of gravity of the body.
And given two runners of swimmers of the same height, one black and one white, what matters is not total height, but the position of the belly button, or the center of gravity, said Duke.
University professor Andre Bejan, the lead author of the study.
Wait a minute.
I have sorry, I have editorial cut.
They've got somebody from Duke.
Can anybody say Duke Lacrosse team?
They got somebody from Duke studying the racial aspects of belly button location and athletics.
Back to the story.
Individuals of West African origin have longer legs than European origin athletes, which means that their belly buttons are three centimeters or one point one eight inches higher than whites, said the Duke researcher Andre Bejan.
That means the black athletes have a hidden height that is 3% greater than whites, which gives them significant speed advantages.
Locomotion is essentially a continual process of falling forward.
Mass that falls from a higher altitude falls faster, said the race researcher.
In the pool, meanwhile, whites have the advantage because they have longer torsos, making their belly buttons lower in the general scheme of body architecture.
Swimming is the art of surfing the wave created by the swimmer, said the race researcher at Duke.
The swimmer who makes the bigger wave is the faster swimmer, and a longer torso makes a bigger wave.
Europeans have a three percent longer torso than West Africans, which gives them a 1.5% speed advantage in a pool.
Asians have the same long torsos as Europeans, giving them the same potential to be record breakers in the pool, but they often lose out to whites because whites are taller.
Men, nothing's fair.
Many scientists have avoided studying why blacks make better sprinters and whites better swimmers because of what the study calls the obvious race angle.
And of course, we can't have any science that might explain things that certain people don't want to know.
But Andre Bejan said the study he conducted with Edward Jones, a professor at Howard University in Washington, and the Duke graduate Jordan Charles focused on the athlete's geographic origins and biology, not race.
Which what they didn't study race.
Uh so they just say the athletes from Africa, and there's not a racial component here.
Just to be clear, Bejan, the researcher is white originally from Romania.
Jones is black from South Carolina.
We have to know that.
Otherwise we would assume these people are racists.
So again the yeah.
Uh we have to next study Asian gymnasts, especially those who are eight or nine years old who might apparently look like they're fourteen or fifteen.
When you're gonna start discussing gymnasts, we've got to start discussing the development of the upper torso and the effect that would have on balance and of course speed as it relates to centrifugal force.
So from this, we now jump to the audio sound bites.
Guess who's back?
Malik Zulu Shabazz.
We have a clip from May 29th of this year in Atlanta at the new Black Panther Party convention.
Chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz and King Samir Shabazz, who said white cracker babies need to be killed.
We have a portion of their remarks.
We do not and are not able to report on the location of their belly buttons.
I don't even see how we got a discussion or a debate in the black community on whether or not we should be armed.
I got King Samir here, and he's always, I can say this, wherever I go, he'd been by my side.
How many of y'all want to know the quickest way to get rid of police brutality?
How many really want to know?
The quickest way to get rid of the police brutality is to get rid of police.
It makes no damn sense why cracker police come in your neighborhood and militarize your neighborhood.
I love fighting me some crackers.
Straight up.
I love fighting Pecker Woods.
And in the woods, too.
You gotta have the heart to step to these bastards, man.
That's King Samir Shabazz, the longtime associate of Malik Zulu Shabazz, both proud members of the new Black Panther Party.
This from their convention, May 29th in Atlanta, Georgia.
Don't forget King Samir Shabazz, one of the new Black Panther members, uh against whom charges for voter intimidation of Philadelphia were dropped.
Uh Dave in New Orleans, great to have you on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Nice to have you with us.
Hi, Rush.
Uh oil soaked dinos from the Gulf Course.
I mean the Gulf Coast of Louisiana.
Yeah, thank you very much.
Rush, the local radio station down here, WRNO, is has been broadcasting commercials and and they're sponsored by the uh uh the state of Louisiana and in the commercials, uh, the state of Louisiana's probably the health department here down in Louisiana is uh providing psychological counseling for uh thousands of people who've lost their jobs due to the BP oil spill.
And I'm just wondering why the federal government hasn't seen fit to have similar psychological counseling for the millions of people across this country who've lost their jobs in the last year and a half due to the income redestitution of this administration.
That's an interesting question.
So there is unemployment psychological counseling in the Gulf because of BP, as well as the drilling moratorium, I'm sure.
That's right.
Well, tell me about that.
What's being offered?
Where do you go and and and what do they do for you?
I'm really not sure, but I know it's it's uh they advertise it just about every day in W R and O. So what you might want to do is maybe just call the uh your local uh uh the local station, the Rush Radio Station in New Orleans, and maybe ask them to get you a copy of the commercial, and then you could probably, you know, uh it probably they would probably be able to tell you a lot more about it too.
But I just thought it interesting that the state seems to be more on the cutting edge of providing some kind of psychological relief uh for uh this this horrible.
Now, look at I I appreciate this.
I really do, but uh this is psychological counseling for people who've lost their jobs because of the BP spill and now the moratorium.
Is there any counseling on how to go find a replacement job?
Or is it just psychological counseling on how to deal with not having yours?
I I think it's the latter.
Uh what they're saying is, you know, get it off your chest.
If you if you're if you have a problem, get it off your chest and talk to counselors.
They're they're waiting 24 hours standing by and all this other stuff.
And so, okay, if that's what they're saying, I understand your point.
There's a whole potential new business out there.
Unemployment psychological counseling.
My God, think of the customers you'd have all over the country.
He's right.
And the media is at Twitter today, the Washington Post, The NAA LCP to vote on a controversial resolution condemning Tea Party supporters.
They're going to have a resolution from the NAA LCP convention alleging that the Tea Party is racist.
Now, why is this resolution controversial?
We had polling from ABC yesterday that there's less racism in the Tea Party than the general population.
It's controversial.
This resolution is controversial because it is not true.
The NAALCP once again participates in dividing the people of this country at their convention.