All Episodes
Previous Next
May 19, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:36
May 19, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And you know what else this Kritz guy said during his campaign?
The Democrat, Pennsylvania 12.
In addition to being pro-gun, in addition to being pro-life, in addition to being anti-Obamacare, in addition to being for offshore oil drilling after the spill, in the campaign, the Democrat claimed crits that Western Pennsylvania could become the energy capital of the world with their natural gas reserves and their oil reserves and nuclear power.
And this was the Democrat that swept to victory in Pennsylvania 12 yesterday, and all of these people on the media side are acting like this is a giant sweep and a great look at folks.
Obama held a little news conference today with Felipe Coleron.
He took just one question from a Univision reporter and one question from a Mexican reporter, and one of those questions had eight questions, and it went on for two minutes, and Obama said, Well, you know, I uh em open the statement I answer most of that comprehensive way.
Let me deal with the second question you ask.
I kid you not.
This guy had about eight questions in one question.
Obama said, I've answered all that in my opening statement.
I comprehensive here, but I'll let me let me tackle number two for you.
So it was very convenient.
There were there were no questions, no other questions.
And folks, the politico and the state control media want you to believe Obama's the big winner last night.
He wasn't asked about last night's results.
He didn't bring up last night's results.
If Obama was the big winner last night, he would have opened this presser with what a great day it was for America moving forward.
So again, I, L. Rushbow at 1-800-282-2882, there's the show open for you.
Urge all of you in the media who are seeking such uh happiness and delight today over what you think is the important race, Pennsylvania 12, where the Republicans should have steamrolled to victory in a two-to-one Democrat district.
You get you get your boys, you get your Democrats.
I don't care where they are, you get them to run on Obama's agenda.
You get them to run for re-election in November on Pelosi and Reed's and Obama's agenda, and you have to bring Obama in to campaign for him, and then win, and then we'll talk.
But if you guys can only win by emulating me, this guy, Chris in Pennsylvania 12, was the rush limbaugh of the Democrat Party throughout this campaign.
Make no mistake about it, folks.
There is a conservative ascendancy that's going on out there.
And the Democrats know it, in order to win, even in a two-to-one district, they have to sound like me.
What a news conference.
Not one question about last night's results.
So again, disconnect between liberalism and Americanism.
What is real is ignored.
What is not real is highlighted, amplified, and made up.
If Arlen Specter would have won last night, Obama would have opened up with a shout out to his big hombre amigo.
Because he was out there saying it when the Specter switch party that.
That Obama said he had Spectre's one tough hombre.
You know what I loved about that campaign?
Spectre was out there running commercials.
I mean, they were saturating the state with commercials of Obama praising Spectre, switching parties, one tough hombre.
So what did Sestack do?
Sestak went out, got an ad, put together an ad that included video of George W. Bush coming in to praise Arlen Specter when he was running against Pat Toomey.
So if you're a Democrat in Pennsylvania and you're going to polls and it's raining cats and dogs and it's cold as hell, unseasonably cold, and you see these two ads, what the hell?
You're gonna go Sestac, uh, even if you don't know who he is.
So I would I would venture a Cestax ads using Bush, supporting Spectre, had much more impact than Spectre's ads, with Obama supporting him.
Let's go before we we got audio soundbites of all this too on the uh on the meet.
Oh, and the chef, the controversy over the White House chef, it continues.
The chef, his name is Rick Bayless.
He says, I wouldn't tweeting from the White House.
Lynn Sweet, Chicago Sun Times, you you apologize.
I wasn't tweeting from the White House from the White House kitchen, which is true.
But he is tweeting.
He is tweeting about what he's doing in there.
He's tweeting about the menu.
In fact, today he tweeted at 70.
Okay, time to head to the White House gang.
Ah, but it'll be a big day.
I hope there aren't any hitches.
So he's tweeting, but just not from the White House.
And the White House, the you know, the regime does not like the fact he's tweeting, but he still is.
He originally tried to deny that he was tweeting and is no, no, no, I'm tweeting.
I'm just not tweeting from inside the White House I know.
Can you believe we've been discussing this?
We're talking here about the presidency of the United States and the White House, and we've got this little contratent, this argument over some celeb chef from Chicago coming in and tweeting.
Free tweets.
I'm going to the White at 7:30.
I'm headed to the White House now.
As though I get look at I'm sure the guy has a bunch of Twitter fans.
Follow him around.
Yeah, well, they do that, Snerdly.
These people that tweet, deuce yeah, I'm head to the bathroom now, won't be back for a while.
Play MacArthur's Park.
Uh or or whatever.
It's it's all part of notice me, notice me, notice me.
Audio sound buttons.
You have to hear it.
I wish you didn't have to hear it, but you have to hear it.
This afternoon, White House Rose Garden, President Obama standing side by side, the Mexican President Felipe Calderon.
We also discussed the new law in Arizona, which is a misdirected effort, a misdirected expression of frustration over our broken immigration system, and which has raised concerns in both our countries.
I want everyone, American and Mexican to know my administration is taking a very close look at the Arizona law.
We're examining any implications, especially for civil rights.
Because in the United States of America, no law-abiding person, be they an American citizen or a visitor or tourist from Mexico should ever be subject to suspicion simply because of what they look like.
And they aren't.
They continue.
He hasn't read the law.
Attorney General hasn't read the law.
Homeland Security hasn't read the law.
Obama hasn't read the law purposely so they can mischaracterize it.
There isn't any profiling in this bill.
They're not stopped because of what they look like.
But all that aside, disconnect.
Liberalism and Americanism.
What country is this guy the president of?
What country does Barack Obama believe himself to be the leader of?
He says he discussed what Felipe Calderon, the new law in Arizona, which is a misdirected effort.
If you look at California immigration law, very, very close to what's already going to be on the book soon in Arizona, a misdirected expression of frustration over our broken immigration system, which you are making no effort to fix, sir.
Which has raised concerns in both our countries.
I want everyone, American and Mexican, to know that my administration is taking a very close look at the Arizona law.
We're examining any implications, especially for civil rights violations.
Because the United States, no law-abiding person, be they an American citizen or visitor or tourist.
Visitor or tourist.
We're not talking about visitors or tourists.
Should ever be subject to suspicion?
Buyer's remorse to anybody.
Once again, the president of the United States siding against the people who elected him, siding against the American people.
Pandering to the President of Mexico.
Here's one of the questions Obama got.
Mr. President, President Calderon called the Arizona law discriminatory.
You've called it misdirected.
Do you agree with him?
What impact do you think this law can have on U.S. Mexican relations, the prospect for immigration reform, and the lives of millions of Mexican Americans in this country?
What actions did you tell President Calderon you would follow in the following days and weeks?
A fair reading of the language of the statute indicates that it gives the possibility of individuals who are deemed suspicious of being illegal immigrants from being harassed or arrested.
And the judgments that are going to be made in applying this law are troublesome.
The President of the United States is lying to the American people.
He is saying Arizona acted stupidly, just like he said of the cop in Cambridge.
But he doesn't know the facts because he hasn't read the law because the way he's characterizing the law is false.
And he knows it's false.
The President of the United States knows he is mischaracterizing this law and lying about it.
So in his in his view, a fair reading of the Arizona Immigration Law means to ignore the plain words of the law.
A fair reading means I'm going to see in this bill what I need to see politically to advance my agenda.
And I'm not going to read the bill, so I always have an excuse to characterize it however I wish to characterize it.
He then continued, he wasn't through with the answer.
What I've directed my Justice Department do is to look very carefully at the language of this law to see whether it comports both with our core values and existing legal standards, as well as the fact that the federal government is ultimately the one charged with immigration policy.
And I expect to get uh a final report back from the Justice Department soon, uh, at which point we'll make some decisions in terms of how we are gonna uh uh address that law.
So the regime is plotting in ways to actually overthrow core American values.
He's not interested in upholding them.
The truth be known, President Obama does not like core American values.
He believes core American values are discriminatory, racist, bigoted, homophobic, anti-environmental, whatever.
Make no mistake, he has a huge chip on his shoulder.
I've heard people in the media say, well, it's up to you to provide uh motive.
I'm not I'm not interested in motive, I'm just a reporter here.
I, you know, uh we uh we just examine the facts of both sides and we report independently on motive.
Well, I am it's just motive because motive is the key.
Motive is the point.
It's not enough just to say, yeah, Obama is throwing a state overboard.
Yeah, Obama is throwing his own country overboard when it comes to ill illegal immigration and protecting the border.
It damn well is important.
Why?
Not just that he's doing it.
What has happened here today is that Barack Obama has turned the United States of America and himself into Felipe Calderon's doormat?
Wouldn't you say?
And he has invited Felipe Calderon and the Mexicans to step on us again today and to keep stepping on us because we are Mexico's doormat.
Thank you, President Obama.
That's one of the things that he accomplished today.
He said he instructed a Department of Justice to carefully look at the law.
Does that mean that the Attorney General is going to read it?
Because the Attorney General has not read it.
By the way, just a brief little aside here.
This uh this chef, the tweeting chef, Rick Bayless, supposedly an expert in uh in Mexican cuisine.
Why are they bringing in an expert in Mexican cuisine?
Can't Calderon get that every day?
If you were never mind.
I just Be back in a second.
How come uh how come neither of Barack Obama's top advisors are Mexican?
They're both white guys from Chicago, Axelrod and Ron Emmanuel.
How come there are no Mexicans there?
I mean, is not the president himself discriminating.
His Supreme Court nominee wasn't Mexican.
She's Pretorican.
And uh Kagan, she's not Mexican.
Where is all this outreach to Mexico?
He said, in that one sound bite, he said the Arizona law is troublesome.
That's exactly what he said about me.
Remember.
Rush Limbaugh is troublesome.
Listening to Rush Limbaugh's troublesome.
So anybody gets in his way, and Arizona, you are in his way.
Has got to be swept away.
Now, lest you think it was all groveling and bending over, grabbing the ankles.
The president did get tough.
In the press conference with Felipe Corderon.
He did get tough.
He's gonna get tough on illegal immigration in one area.
And this is it.
The second thing we've got to do is we've got to make sure the businesses are following the rules and are not actively recruiting undocumented workers so that they don't have to abide by overtime laws.
They don't have to abide by minimum wage laws, they don't have to abide by worker safety laws and otherwise undercut basic worker protections that exist.
And they have to be held accountable and responsible.
True to form, Barack Obama gonna get tough on business.
Just listen to him, folks.
He will tell you who his enemies are.
If we're gonna keep counting race, snurkly, if we're if we're gonna keep counting races, these are fair questions.
Where are the Mexicans in his administration?
We're the Mexican court nominees.
But there you have it, business.
We are gonna continue to go after them.
They have the audacity to try to make a profit.
If they don't do things, we're gonna, we're gonna rape, we're gonna come after we're gonna we're gonna destroy them.
So the phones we go.
We're gonna start in Charleston, South Carolina.
Charlene, great to have you on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hi, how are you?
Very well, thank you.
Good.
I just wanted to say that if it was something that affected you or I've family by an illegal immigrant who was a criminal, then there would be no no heads turning.
But I guarantee you that if it was something that affected the president's family immediately, he would have them out of here quicker than you can say Mikasa Sukasa.
I'd tell you what he would.
Exactly.
That's just another way of saying what I brilliantly pointed out last week.
And that is if these illegals by a margin of 70% to 30% were gonna vote Republican, Obama would build an acelotrain from Phoenix to Peru, and they'd get it get them out of here before the train was even finished.
He'd fly them out of here.
Yep, and and another thing is is the fact that my mother's an immigrant.
So I accept the fact that you know, give me your hungry, give me your poor, all of that, but do it the right way.
My mother went to college, she got an education, she pays taxes.
She she has a social security network.
Wait a minute.
You know what?
I'm glad you brought this up because that inscription on the Statue of Liberty.
Give me your tired, give me your poor, give me your hungry, has been so distorted by the letter.
It doesn't mean give me your welfare cases.
Yes, don't give me your problems.
Don't give me your prize.
Yeah, it doesn't mean give me your problem.
It doesn't mean give me the dregs of society.
It's not what it means.
Yep, I've always said that if if you can't take care of your kids at home, don't go adopt another kid.
And we have problems here that we need to take care of, let alone bringing other people into the country, just causing more welfare and more problems and more issues and more crime.
That's exactly right.
Well, look, I'm glad you called out there.
Thanks, Charlene, very much.
Jack in Hot Springs, Arkansas, great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Rush, thanks for taking my call.
Yeah.
Uh tarballs are not new.
I loved your comment uh and your commentary on the tarballs, the supposed tarballs in Florida.
Uh I was thinking, God help us if if the if the uh the oil increases uh and and and finds a current that'll take it through the Panama Canal all the way up to California.
I was uh born 74 years ago in Santa Monica.
There's been tar on the beaches from San Diego to Santa Barbara all of my lifetime.
Hell, it's been it's been uh it it's I know.
There's tar on my beach on the Atlantic Ocean yesterday.
Yeah.
There's tar out there every day.
There's natural oil seepage into the ocean every day.
Exactly.
These tar balls in Key West did not just materialize out of nowhere.
They're probably were there last week.
It's just that no eager beaver scientists were noticing them because their attention was focused on the big oil spill in the Gulf.
And then somebody noticed some tarballs on the beaches of Key West.
Oh, oh, aha!
Aha!
Our predictions are right.
The current, the current is bringing that spill here.
Oh no, we're all gonna die.
Oh, the tarballs are not from the oil.
Ah, damn it!
Can't we get a break and get a real disaster here?
Have you seen the mugshot of Faisal Shazad?
ABC is somehow exclusively got hold of it.
Federal mugshots are generally not released.
Uh, but I've I just caught a glimpse of it.
Looks like your average white guy uh in his 40s that hates health care.
Not welcome back.
L Rushbow, this the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Remember yesterday, said I on this program.
I know a lot of you people engage in drinking games on election night.
Take a shot, take a slug, take a swig every time a certain word is mentioned.
Let me tell you something.
Do not play a drinking game today or tonight.
If you have to take a drink every time the media says these primaries are not a referendum on Obama.
Because you are going to get smashed and you may die of alcohol poisoning.
They may have to run you to the hospital tonight.
Do not get into that.
Do not play the drinking game all you want, but do not sign up to take a swig unless you want to kill yourself.
Every time the media says not a referendum on Obama.
And some people are still drinking today because the media hasn't let up.
We have a sample montage.
It's a referendum on everything but Obama.
A referendum on Arlen Spector.
Referendum on the 80-year-old Spectre.
Referendum on government.
A referendum of sorts on organizational politics.
A referendum on Mitch McConnell.
This is a referendum on debt and spending.
A referendum on Rand Paul and his views.
The referendum on the national debt.
The referendum is on 17.2% real unemployment.
I don't see all of those races as a referendum at all on Barack Obama.
Well, um, of course, that was the it can't be.
Obama was the big winner, don't you say?
In truth, Obama was the big loser last night.
Look.
Pro guns, pro-life, anti-government health care, anti-tax increases.
This guy in Pennsylvania 12 did his best to sound crits.
Sound like me, the Rush Limbaugh the Democrat Party.
In other words, he lied through his teeth, and he had to do this in a two-to-one Democrat district in order to win.
And the Democrats in the media today are clinging to this two to one victory as something monumental that turns back all the conventional wisdom that the Republicans were going to sweep to big victory in November.
I'm going to issue this challenge again to all of you at the politico, all of you in the uh state controlled media.
If Obama was the big winner last night, or if you want to say that Obama, this was not a referendum on Obama.
Then all Democrats in the House and Senate who are up for re-election should run on Obama's agenda.
They should run on Pelosi's agenda.
They should run on Harry Reed's agenda.
In other words, all of you Democrats.
Because this a big victory for Obama last night.
All you Democrats running for re-election, go ahead and run on more spending.
Go ahead and run On more tax increases.
Go ahead and run as an advocate for bigger government.
Go ahead and run on the fact that 10% unemployment is something worth celebrating.
Go ahead and run on record-high foreclosures.
Go ahead and run on your support for porculus stimulus bills and 20% budget increases.
Go ahead.
You Democrats up for re-election, you run on attacking Israel.
Run on your support for amnesty for illegal immigrants.
You run on the Obama agenda.
You run on the Pelosi agenda.
You run on the Harry Reed agenda.
You stand side by side with every agenda item.
You want tax increases, you want 10% unemployment, you want an ever-growing government, you want more bailouts for everybody in the world paid for by us.
You want to attack Israel.
You have no problem with Iran getting a nuclear weapon.
Go ahead and run on it.
Go ahead and run on your support for amnesty.
Go ahead and run on the fact that Arizona is troublesome.
Go ahead, you Democrats, you run on it.
And you people in the media that support the Democrats, go ahead and give them this advice.
New York Times editorial board.
Come on, ship up.
Give them this advice.
Obama's the big winner.
The Democrat Party is going to sweep to victory now because of what happened in Pennsylvania 12.
Fine.
Then have them proudly run on this agenda.
Have them proudly run on who Barack Obama is.
Run on this laser-like focus that you have on job creation.
Run on all of the new homes that are not being bought.
Loan demand to buy homes has now sunk to a 13-year low.
That's the story today.
Foreclosures and repossessions of homes are up.
Go ahead.
You want to run on the Obama agenda?
You Democrats and you members of the media go out there in unison and start attacking the people of Arizona.
Attack the Arizona law.
Stand up for amnesty.
Be honest about what you believe in and what you're doing.
If the Obama agenda is it, if it's the big winner last night, then by all means, bring Obama in to campaign for you.
Bring Obama in to fundraise for you.
Like he did Arlen Spector.
Like he did Coakley in Massachusetts.
Like he went in for Craig's in Virginia.
Wherever he's gone, he's 0 for 4.
Maybe now 0 for 5.
All of what I have said is what the Democrat Party stands for.
There's a huge disconnect in this country.
Liberalism versus Americanism.
By the way, did Mr. Obama tell Felipe Caldadon to stop drilling for oil in the Gulf of Mexico?
Did I miss that?
Did he maybe he didn't do that?
Interesting.
So the Mexicans do not have to stop drilling for oil, we do.
Okay, run on that too, Democrats.
Run on that.
Shut down every rig.
No more drilling offshore.
No more drilling for oil anywhere.
Run on it.
Bring in Hugo Chavez to speak up for your agenda and your campaign.
Bring in Daniel Ortega from Nicolagua.
Go ahead and do it.
I mean, if it's the big winner, if you guys own it, if Pennsylvania 12 says that you have turned it all around, then let's see it.
Let's see the pride.
Let's see the happiness.
How come your president today did not take any questions about last night's results?
How come the president of the United States did not herald the results last night as a big victory for him, a great victory for America, and a great victory for America's future?
Why, in fact, did the president only take two questions, both from foreign press, well, Univision and a Mexican reporter.
Why?
The president yesterday went into Ohio, rubbing salt in a wound, 15% unemployment.
Yet he tells them how great things are.
We're on the way back.
All right, do that.
10% unemployment, new norm.
That's great.
You run on it.
You see, those of you in the media, you're not fooling anybody.
You're not fooling us.
And you're not fooling the wise and intelligent people of this audience.
We know what you're going to say and do before we before you do it.
You have telegraphed your moves.
We know who liberals are.
We know how liberalism, as opposed to Americanism functions.
We know how you're going to report on a specific story.
We know what you're going to ignore.
So you look at Pennsylvania 12, and now you've got a job to do.
You've got to somehow convince everybody that Pennsylvania 12 means that everybody's been wrong about this coming November sweep for the Republicans.
Yep, that one election.
Two to one Democrat race, with a Democrat candidate sounding more like me than sometimes I sound like myself every day.
Pro-gun, pro-life, pro-natural gas, pro-oil drilling in Pennsylvania, pro-nuclear power in Pennsylvania, anti-Obamacare, and this guy wins.
My guess is the people in his district knew he was lying through his teeth.
Union people know full well this guy doesn't believe what he said.
Union people wouldn't have voted for him if he did.
That's a two-to-one Democrat district.
Crits would not have won if Democrat voters actually believed what he was saying.
And if I'm wrong, and if they did believe what he was saying, because they want to believe it, then it's really over for the Democrats.
So I don't know how you win either way, you analyze this.
But you keep at it.
And as you analyze it, we're going to make sure you eat your words come November, back after this.
Okay, let's continue this.
Let's take a little uh more detailed look at uh not just yesterday's election results, but uh some uh prior election results.
In Arkansas, you really had a battle there between a liberal in Blanche Lincoln and a more aggressive liberal in her opponent.
There's no conservative running in the primary down there.
It was a total media myth.
That race is of no consequence for the fall.
It doesn't reflect anything except its dire consequences exist to the left and the media.
For they can uh continue their template of the narrative.
The aggressive liberals failed to take out the normal liberal, and now there's going to be a runoff between an aggressive liberal and a usual liberal.
But regardless, they're both liberals, and you got a disconnect between liberalism and Americanism.
Now, the big loser last night, Barack Obama, Obama backed Spectre.
And then in the last week he couldn't campaign in Pennsylvania because everybody knew Spectre would have no choice, uh no chance at all if Obama went in there.
This is the dirty little secret.
And the people in the media know this.
If Obama had gone in there, it would have definitely been the indispect.
It was the indispector anyway, but Obama would have been a nail in the coffin.
Nor could Obama go to Pennsylvania 12.
Even in a two-to-one Democrat district, he would have helped the Republican.
There's no way Obama could have gone in there with the campaign that Chris Kritz was running.
Pro-life, pro-gun, anti-Obama health care, big for drilling in oil after the oil spill.
He hates cap and trade, wants to drill for oil in Pennsylvania, natural gas and nuclear.
You tell me Obama can go in there and endorse that.
There is no effing way, as Joe Biden would say.
And John Kerry, who served in Vietnam, all talks that way.
There was no way Obama could go in there.
If Obama went in there, he would have helped the Republican.
Obama backed Blanche Lincoln in Arkansas.
He is so unpopular in Arkansas, he couldn't even get a free massage at the Clinton Library.
In fact, might not even get a massage if somebody, if he paid somebody at the Clinton Library massage parlor.
He he couldn't set foot in the state of Arkansas.
It would have been the kiss of death for Blanche Lincoln.
And Obama did not go to Kentucky either, Did he?
So if Obama and his policies are so popular, even among Democrats, where was Waldo?
Where was Obama?
You guys at the political might want to have, you know, write all this down so you can better understand what's occurring out there.
You might want to write this down, the monologues of this hour.
Because you have got it so wrong on what happened yesterday that it's troublesome.
You see, why didn't why didn't Pelosi go into PA-12?
Why didn't Reed go in there?
Where were all the prominent Democrats in Pennsylvania 12?
Remember in the polls, this race was neck and neck.
You know, going into the election last night, vote count.
A lot of people thought this was going to be a toss-up.
The polls said it was.
Why weren't there any prominent Democrats in there helping out this Kritz guy?
They couldn't not with the campaign he was running.
And yet here, well, they sent Clinton in there, but toward the end of the run, and even the newspapers that remark on Clinton going in there put it at the tail end of the story.
Here, grab audio soundbite number eight.
David Gregory of the state controlled media, NBC on the Today Show today, Matt Wower.
The only race yesterday where somebody was actually elected and gets a seat.
Pennsylvania 12.
That's where Mark Kritz won.
How big a win was that for the Democrat Party?
How does the White House feel about that?
They feel great about it, and legitimately so, because Republicans I've been speaking to for weeks were ready to pounce on that result if the Republican had won.
They made the election in that case a real referendum on the president and on Democrats in Congress, and they lost.
Ah.
Mertha's seat was a referendum on Obama.
How come Obama's not singing the praises of his big victory?
Mr. Gregory, again, do you even know what Mark Critz's agenda was, what his campaign agenda was?
There's not one elected Democrat in this country who had gone in there and endorsed him and his campaign and maintained any kind of credibility whatsoever.
Zilch, Zero Nada.
John Padoritz, J Pod.
Peace in the New York Post today.
U.S. politics new rules.
The key rule in American politics is that there aren't any rules anymore.
Any politician running for re-election or seeking election as his party's anointed one who faces any kind of a credible challenger finds himself in history's crosshairs.
Arlen Spector defeated.
At this writing, it appeared Blanche Lincoln, two-term Democrat Senator Arkansas, be forced into her primary.
She was.
Rand Paul, insurgent Republican libertarian in Kentucky, crushed the preferred GOP establishment candidate with the force of a steamroller.
All this followed hard upon the defeat last week in West Virginia's Democrat primary of Alan Mollihan, long-serving wealthy congressman.
That came a few days after the unprecedented dumping of Utah's three-term U.S. Senator Robert Bennett at the state's Republican convention, which came a week after a popular former senator limped into his party's nomination for an open seat with just 40% of the vote.
Just before that, David Obi, the immensely powerful Democrat head of the House of Appropriations Committee, ended his re-election effort after 41 years.
Because he saw the writing on the wall.
The electoral year that began in January with Scott Brown's staggering victory in the race for Ted Kennedy's seat in Massachusetts is nowhere done with us yet.
J-Pod's right on the money.
Here's a soundbite for you.
Gotta go quick.
Unidentified girl, Silver Springs, Maryland, high school this afternoon.
Everybody away at some past papers.
Yeah, well, that that's something that we have to work on, right?
To make sure that people can be here with the right kind of papers, right?
That's exactly right.
Yeah, well, we have to work on that.
We have to fix that.
And that everybody's got to work together in Congress to make sure that that happens.
Not high school, that's an elementary school.
A second grader asked the first lady.
My mom says Barack Obama is taking away everybody that doesn't have papers.
So the Democrats using children as props again.
Back in a moment.
City of San Antonio, Texas is going to require a lingerie store to get a food permit because they sell edible female underwear.
▲
Export Selection