All Episodes
Previous Next
May 18, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:35
May 18, 2010, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Okay, now Big Sis has not read the uh immigration bill.
Janet Napolitano of the Homeland Security has not read the Arizona immigration law.
Nor has State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley.
Well, if they haven't read it, you know Obama hasn't read it, because Obama does a work.
He campaigns, but he doesn't work.
That's why he doesn't know the effect of his policies on people who do work.
Hi, folks, how are you?
Rush Lynn Ball.
Once again, raring and ready to go, sitting in sconched behind the golden EIB microphone.
The telephone number, if you want to be on the program today, 800 282-2882, and the email address L Rush Ball at EIBNet.com.
All right, another Democrat has enhanced his resume in a blue state.
This would be the Attorney General of Connecticut, Richard Blumenthal, said that he served in Vietnam when he did not.
He lied about it.
He was never there.
Now, the interesting thing about this is, uh, ladies and gentlemen, sternly, I want you to be on the lookout, because what happens here when we bring subjects like this up?
You're gonna have people calling in here, wait, Linboy, you didn't serve either.
You didn't I even lied about it, though.
I never said I was there.
I never said I even went over there for the USO show.
I never said I was in Vietnam.
But saying that you are lying about your service in Vietnam can get you elected to the U.S. Senate, is called John F. Carey, the uh the haughty John Kerry, who everybody knows served in Vietnam.
Um, Blumenthal hears from a blue state.
Blue states hate the military.
So anything to embarrass himself, the military, it's not necessarily necessarily a bad thing here for Blumenthal.
In the Democrat Party, uh, I mean, if he had if if he if there was a oh instance in his past where he had lied about medals that he got while he was in Vietnam and threw fake versions of those medals over offense at the White House, why he might be elected president someday, or at least get the Democrat Party presidential nomination.
So let's go to the audio sound bites.
This is uh March 2nd, 2008.
This was all dug up, by the way, by uh um uh uh uh Lyndon McMahon, who is Vince McMahon's wife of the World Wrestling Federation.
Uh now that she had it on her website, it's been scrubbed.
Um they were proud to have dug this up.
Here's Blumenthal at a veteran ceremony in March of 2008.
We have learned something very important since the days that I served in Vietnam.
And you exemplify it.
Whatever we think about the war, whatever we call it, Afghanistan or Iraq, we owe our military men and women unconditional support.
All right, now this is one of the Democrat Party's rising stars.
He still may be.
So that's the setup.
Here's the lie.
Serving in the United States military gave me a perspective as well, even in the reserves.
Although I did not serve in Vietnam.
Now, that's the Blumenthal campaign putting out another tape.
That was from March 1st of 2010, where he has corrected the lie.
The previous there's audio previously where he has said he served in Vietnam.
Now the two years later, he's uh he's clarifying that he did not serve in Vietnam, only in the reserves at Paris Island, uh South Carolina.
So let's go to the arbiter on this.
Um, I don't mean Mary Mapes and uh and Dan Rather.
Can you speaking of which, you think we'll get a story about this from Mary Mapes, wherever she is, and Dan Rather.
Well, here's the forehead.
Paul Bagala was asked about this last night on Anderson Cooper 225.
Uh Cooper said at least eight newspaper articles from 2003 to 2009 describe Blumenthal as having served in Vietnam.
This is a savvy guy.
See?
See?
He's a savvy guy.
He lied about his service in Vietnam.
Bush did not lie about anything.
And he's an idiot.
But Blumenthal is a savvy guy, according to Anderson Cooper 225.
It's a savvy guy.
This is a lawyer.
This is the Attorney General of Connecticut.
Why on earth would he mislead people and mislead people as to the nature of his time in the military?
Here's the forehead.
There is no good or ethical reason that he could have possibly done that, Anderson.
He did serve with real distinction in the Marine Corps reserves, but never served in Vietnam.
And you read those four words.
That appears to be factually false.
It's indefensible.
It's a catastrophic mistake because it's not the sort of mistake people tend to make.
It wasn't a mistake.
It was a lie.
Now, the New York Times headline on this is just it's over the top great.
Candidates' words on Vietnam service differ from history.
Is that not a great headline?
Is that, I mean, think what you will of the New York the ways they come up with to cover for their guys is just amazing.
Candidates' history, candidates' words on Vietnam service differ from history.
You know, it's so rare to find a Democrat liar.
Do you realize that's why the New York Times kind of I'm being facetious, yes, of course.
I think maybe what this guy's doing, I think at the end of the day, what he will do will come out and support the new uh courageous restraint medal that we announced last week.
We the NATO is the Obama administration is called the Yellow Cross, the Yellow Star, and it's going to be given to people who uh probably posthumously showed great restraint in combat and did not pull a trigger.
And maybe that's what he's angling for here to be the first to receive this award.
Because he didn't go to Vietnam and therefore courageous restraint.
And that's how he can turn this around.
Uh look for it.
Don't, don't, I mean, I'm not predicting it, but I wouldn't be surprised.
Um couple questions, though, on this.
In the big scheme of things, what's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about everything your administration's doing.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about your own health care plan.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about a stimulus bill creating jobs in the private sector.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about the swine flu being a national emergency.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about Obamacare bending the cost curve down and lowering premiums by $2,500 a year.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about the need to create a bigger deficit in order to reduce the deficit.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about transparency, lying about health care hearings on C-SPAN, lying about posting your bills five days before they are voted on on the internet.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about not resting until jobs are created and the oil spill is cleaned up and then heading off to play golf and basketball.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about the Arizona immigration law that no one in the Obama administration seems to have read.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or making comments on a piece of legislation that attacks American citizens in a state that you haven't read.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam Or lying about closing Guantanamo Bay.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about preventing Iran from developing nukes.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about no new taxes for those making under $250,000 a year.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about your relationship with a domestic terrorist Bill Ayers.
Uh, who blew up the Pentagon and said it didn't go far enough.
I don't think Blumenthal ever had any idea to do that.
Well, he maybe had an idea when not in his head, but he didn't do it, if he had a thought of it.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam or lying about not wanting to run car companies and taking them over.
What's worse?
Lying about Vietnam, serving in Vietnam, or lying about what the Tea Parties are about and who attends them.
What's worse?
Lying about serving in Vietnam, or lying about working with Republicans while slamming the door in their faces.
What's worse?
You tell me, because I don't know where you stop when you start talking about liberalism and this regime especially, it's all lies.
So you stack all of those lies up against Blumenthal, who said he served in Vietnam and then didn't.
You tell me which is worse.
Latest Rasmussen poll 39 to 39 on uh Elena Kagan for SCOTUS.
The Supreme Court of the United States.
Uh Elena Kagan spent the past week introducing herself to the Senate and to the nation.
U.S. voters remain evenly divided over whether she should be confirmed for the high court.
Rasmussen Reports National's telephone survey.
39% of voters believe she should be confirmed.
Another 39 say that she should not be confirmed.
22% are not sure.
And yet the Republicans in the Senate are already caving on this, even though 3939 is by no means a slam dunk.
Now we had these sound bites yesterday of the uh the governor of New Jersey, Jan Brewer.
Arizona, yeah, and uh Jan Jan Brewer of Arizona and uh and Sarah Palin.
He might get ten times the guts of all the guts combined of the male Republicans in the U.S. Senate.
I mean, it's it's it's I couldn't believe those two soundbites.
Cookie grabbed those two sound bites because people may not have heard them yesterday.
Not instantly, whenever you have time, we'll squeeze them in there.
A Delaware man has been charged with faking his way into Harvard and duping the Ivy League screw out of 45,000 in financial aid, grants, and scholarships.
Adam Wheeler, 23, Milton Delaware was admitted to Harvard, became a student in 2007 after he lied, saying that he had earned a perfect academic record at Phillips Academy in Andover, and had studied for a year at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ultimately, authorities said Wheeler's attempts to be an overachiever were his undoing.
Harvard started a look into Wheeler's background after he sought the Screwels endorsement for Rhodes and Fulbright scholarships.
Professor reviewing his application noticed similarities between Wheeler's writing and that of a colleague.
I think a lot of people have faked their way into Harvard, frankly, folks.
I mean, I know somebody's faked his way into the White House straight out of Harvard.
So, I mean, you got to put these things in perspective.
The primaries have the drive-by medius today just transfixed.
They're going to be going round the clock, coverage starting three hours before the polls close, and they're going to be going all night to provide coverage.
It's a stunning thing to look because the drive-bys know that their party is in big trouble.
And the White House is putting out the news that Obama's not going to watch.
Obama doesn't care.
Which we know is not true.
There's also a story in the, I think a politico has it today.
Pelosi Actually excited over the potential loss of seats in the House because she thinks she'll still retain control, but get rid of a bunch of the moderate blue dog Democrats that she doesn't like having around anyway.
Now we predicted that this story would run.
We predicted that this is the way Pelosi would look at it.
We tried to warn the blue dogs prior to the health care vote.
You know, you guys are going to vote for this thing, and Pelosi's going to throw you overboard.
She's going to use your voting for it to get to campaign against you because she doesn't like you being there.
She doesn't like anything but hard leftist radicals in the House.
So Politico dutifully reports now that, oh, it's a sweet this election's gonna be great.
It's definitely fabulous.
Isn't it gonna be great for Obama?
Isn't it gonna be great for Pelosi?
She's gonna still be the speaker, miss smaller margin, but big deal.
She's gonna be surrounded by pure radicals.
So that's the spin.
But here's Pat Cadell.
Last night with new Neil Cavuto yesterday afternoon on the Fox News channel, Pat Cadell had this to say about the primaries today.
The Democratic Party is purging the Democrats.
A lot of it is just anger, and this is anti-establishment.
It is we don't like what you're doing.
It is, and this is setting up November.
This is all a all a preview of what's coming.
We have never had, in my experience of studying alienation.
I started when I was 20 years old in polling.
19.
And doing a national polling.
And I want to tell you, never have I seen anger as great as it is, and it's moving.
We're having a moving process.
The country is out of the box and it's getting more so.
Yeah, and uh he says it's anti uh anti-establishment.
Uh to the extent that the Democrats of the establishment this is true, but what it is is anti-socialist.
It is anti-big government, and he is right.
And the Democrats are not listening to him.
His partner in crime here, Doug Schoen, a Democrat policy uh or polster from out of the Clinton years, has been sounding the alarm bells for I don't know how long the Democrats are not listening.
Well, they may be listening, but they're not heeding any of the advice.
Obama is going to Ohio today, but getting nowhere near Pennsylvania.
He doesn't want to get anywhere near Arlen Specter or and then the Sea Stack race.
He can't win no matter what happens there.
Regardless what happens, Obama does not win.
Uh, and that's why he's staying out of that race.
The only the only Democrat elections that have been won since Obama took office are elections where he has not shown up to campaign.
And that's the only thing that augers well for Spectre.
If you can say that anything augers well.
Now, the the voter anger they say is is against tax and spend politicians.
There's no question that it is.
So what part of the Tea Party do they not understand?
They do understand it perfectly and flawlessly, and that's why the Tea Party has been scared.
And by the way, folks, do not, I know a lot of you people engage in drinking games on election night.
Take a shot, take a slug, take a swig every time a certain word is mentioned.
Let me tell you something.
Do not play a drinking game today or tonight.
If you have to take a drink every time the media says these primaries are not a referendum on Obama.
You may die of alcohol poisoning.
They may have to run you to the hospital tonight.
Do not get into that.
Do not play the drinking game all you want, but do not sign up to take a swig unless you want to kill yourself.
Every time the media says not a referendum on Obama, Obama doesn't care.
Obama's playing basketball, playing golf.
He's not watching tonight.
Marco Rubio has regained the lead in the Florida Senate race.
Rasmussen survey uh says that to Charlie Christ's bounce is over.
In the three-way race, Rubio leads the Senate race now 39%.
Chris at 31, and the Democrat Kendrick Meek at 18%.
12% are undecided just two weeks ago, Chris held a four-point lead over Rubio shortly after he announced on the uh on the independent side of things.
Hugo Chavez announced Saturday the expropriation of a group of iron, aluminum, and transportation companies in Venezuela's mining region.
Oh, speaking of this, I saw on television today, the CEO of British Petroleum.
I forget his name, but he's a doctor, PhD doctor.
This guy is really in for it.
I don't know.
This guy obviously has not been trained about how to deal with the media in this era because he told the truth.
He said, come on, do not worry.
This is not heavy crude, like it came out of the Exxon Valdez.
He said, when you look at the total water volume of the Gulf of Mexico compared to what's leaking from this oil well, it's nothing.
Now that's my word, but he didn't say nothing.
He said it's this is it's this is not oil.
He says it's not even going to kill marine life.
They'll adapt to it.
Marine life would not be able to adapt to heavy oil, but this is light sweet oil, and the compared to the entire water volume of the Gulf, why this is like raindrops in the ocean.
He's a geologist.
I know he's a geologist, but this guy's he's crucified now.
The British petroleum CEO's name is Dr. Tony Hayward.
Uh, Dr. Hayward gained a first-class geology degree and a PhD from Edinburgh University at the age of 22.
But what is he know?
He's the British Petroleum CEO who put in perspective the amount of oil that's coming out of that leak compared to the entire water volume of the Gulf of Mexico.
Well, he'd know much more than these politicians.
Of course he would know much more.
And the Obama administration is now having more investigations.
And Ken Salazar's came out and said, you know, we failed.
Somebody called Obama, a member of his regime is using the word fail.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar concedes the government failed to hold the oil industry accountable and ensure safety in offshore oil drilling.
Well, the Bush administration cited this rig a couple of times.
The Obama administration wanted to give him a ward.
But folks, this is not this is not about the need for new regulations as Salazar is uh is pointing out.
This is about the regime doing its job.
And Bobby Gendal, a governor of Arizona of Louisiana moving in there to do the job, and they're hitting him on his uh being a limited small government guy.
Um, what do you want the federal government in there for?
You offer limited small government.
And again, the people making that charge do not understand what we all mean when we say limited government.
The objective is the defense and protection of the U.S. population and our borders and our interests around the world.
And British Petroleum's paying for it anyway here by order of the regime.
The regime is at the heart of this where they have a responsibility to inspect and require compliance.
That's the job.
The regime failed to carry out that responsibility.
Reforms don't make it safe.
Talk to the people in uh in New Orleans about reforming the levies.
People make people safe.
Competent people to do their jobs make people safe.
This regime is run by power-hungry, greedy people who do not do their jobs.
I don't know if anybody in this regime works in the traditional sense.
They're all campaigners.
They're all spinmeisters.
In terms of doing actual work.
Here, we got the sound bites.
I want you to hear these.
The governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, last Saturday in Phoenix blasting the president of the United States.
Now, I want to ask you, when is the last time you heard a male Republican of any stripe elected official say anything like this about Obama?
While the president is making wise cracks and playing racial politics, some groups have suggested that Arizona be punished for enforcing laws that our federal government has failed to enforce.
That is misguided at best.
Our purpose today is to help the rest of the nation understand the crisis which confronts our state.
Our nation's government is broken.
Our border is being erased, and the president apparently considers it a wonderful opportunity to Divide people along racial lines for his personal political convenience.
I mean, that is what you call a blast.
She has just shown that's last Saturday, the governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, with fortitude, courage, and guts, rarely seen in the Republican Party these days.
She has no fear of what anybody's going to say about her, because what she knows is they're already saying it.
She's not waiting around for a puff piece from the Washington Post style section or the New York Times, nor is she attempting to avoid being criticized in either.
She is representing the people of the state of Arizona, and particularly those who elected her.
And she wasn't through.
It's fair to ask whether he intends to be the commander in chief or the comic in-chief.
Since the president's joke was so inappropriate, I suppose if I wanted to join in the comedian game, I could suggest that he'd not give up his day job.
Unfortunately, though, he isn't doing very well at that one either.
And here's Obama.
This is what she was talking about from May 1st, the White House correspondence dinner.
Keep in mind this is the president of the uh United States.
We all know what happens in Arizona when you don't have ID.
Adios, amigos.
There's Barack Obama, his material written for him by the writers, the twelve writers on John Stewart's show, uh Comedy Central.
Twelve writers from Comedy Central wrote the Bamsters routine.
Let's move on to Elena Kagan, or get back to her for just a second.
Ed Whalen, National Review Online.
According to a Wall Street Journal article during her service as a law clerk to Justice Thurgoodmarshall, 1987, Elena Kagan took the position that the Constitution confers so-called positive rights to governmental aid, not just negative liberties protected against governmental interference or penalties,
specifically with respect to one sortiori petition, she expressed her worry that a majority of this court will agree with Judge Posner that the Constitution is a charter of negative rather than positive liberties.
And with respect to another, she discussed a lower court ruling that, relying on evolving standards of decency, held at the 14th Amendment in her words, imposes some affirmative obligations on state officials.
She opined that the holding is correct.
And by correct, she was referring to her best understanding of how the Constitution should be interpreted, not to the court's then prevailing case law.
This is important because this negative rights versus positive rights, we brought this up during the campaign.
The lib, the extremist libs today, don't like the Constitution because they look at it as negative.
Meaning the Constitution says what government can't do to you.
And they don't like that.
They want a constitution of positive liberties.
I know it sounds convoluted, but what they mean by that is they look at this from the government perspective, not the citizen perspective.
They want a constitution written that says what government can do for people, or in their case, two people.
And this argument of theirs has many roots, but we can trace one of these roots to Cass Sunstein, who is now one of Obama's czars.
This is from February 2001, nine years ago.
He was a University of Chicago law professor, where Obama was an, he wasn't even an adjunct, I mean he's a lecturer.
Elena Kagan was a law professor at the University of Chicago as well.
Cass Sunstein had this to say about internet equality nine years ago.
Sites of one point of view agree to provide links to other sites, so that if you're reading a conservative magazine, they would provide a link to a liberal site, and vice versa.
Just to make it easy for people to get access to competing views.
Or maybe a pop-up on your stop the technology, re queue that.
This is what the Supreme Court just said.
You don't you can't regulate.
You can't regulate the internet.
There's no law giving you the right to Internet the uh re regulate the Internet.
Uh net neutrality would force internet providers to provide an equal percentage of, as he's saying here, conservative versus liberal links in a search engine or or or what have you.
There's also some financial aspects to it, too.
But you can see this goes back to 2001.
Uh net neutrality is the term for this now.
But listen to a whole bite again because what what you'll hear here is that uh the reason guys like Sunstein and Kagan and and and Obama the rest want to control the internet is because sometimes people just don't know what's best for our society.
Sites of one point of view agree to provide links to other sites so that if you're reading a conservative magazine, they would provide a link to a liberal site, and vice versa, just to make it easy for people to get access to competing views.
Or maybe a pop-up on your screen that would show an advertisement or maybe even a quick argument for a competing view.
The best would be for this to be done voluntarily, but the word voluntary is a little complicated, and sometimes people don't do what's best for our society unless Congress holds hearings or unless the public demands it.
And the idea would be to have a legal mandate as the last resort and to make sure it's as neutral as possible if we have to get there, but to have that as, you know, an ultimate weapon designed to encourage people to do better.
That's nine years ago.
That's Cass Sunstein, who's now an Obama czar, essentially talking about net neutrality, and Kagan agrees.
This this this notion here of well don't do what's best for our society encompasses as an umbrella a lot of things.
Negative versus positive rights.
Uh Sunstein was the originator of the neck, well, not one of the he's one of the roots, the many originators here of the negative versus positive rights business of the uh of the Constitution.
Uh now here's Obama and his version of what Sunstein said nine years ago on May 1st in Ann Arbor, University of Michigan, commencement ceremony.
If you're a fan of Glenn Beck or Rush Limbaugh, try reading a few columns on the Huffington Post website.
It may make your blood boil.
Your mind may not be changed.
But the practice of listening to opposing views is essential for effective citizenship.
And if you don't do it, they're gonna force you to.
They're gonna force you to be exposed.
This is this is uh pr predominantly because they can't win in the free market with their ideas.
They can't win.
Look at Newsweek.
You know, everybody's looking at Newsweek and say, gee, what's this horrible, horrible, horrible thing that's happening?
Like John Meekham, the uh 39-year-old brainiac.
This guy was a rising star.
I mean, this.
Boy, wonder this this guy had the plum job.
He's running Newsweek.
Now it's up for sale.
Twenty-eight million dollars it's lost last year.
They have had major losses the last two years.
They have had remakes, revamps.
The one thing that Newsweek forgot was to service its audience.
Its audience was other journalists.
Newsweek writers wrote their pieces for Time magazine reporters and CNN reporters and Mess NBC.
It's incestuous, a little clique columns such as uh we're all socialists now.
Uh it's clear liberals on their own cannot succeed in the free market.
You look at what's happened to many traditional media out of New York Times, uh they're losing money, they're losing ad revenue and ad pages.
Ditto Los Angeles Times, uh Time magazine the same, they're all downsizing, television networks, you name it, particularly the uh the news divisions.
Why?
They are working against the interests of the American people.
They have become propagandists for the for the regime.
So the reason Obama, Sunstein, Kagan, all these people want forced neutrality, is because you on your own are not reading their garbage.
You are bypassing their garbage because you're not interested in it, because you already know what their garbage is.
And they don't like that.
So here comes internet regulation, other media regulation that will force their point of view on whatever media platform you use.
That's where they're headed, and that's what Elena Kagan fully supports as well.
By the way, Barack Obama also said about me at a joint congressional leaders meeting in the White House shortly after he was immaculated.
He told Boehner and the Republicans, don't listen to Limbaugh.
That's not how things get done in Washington.
Cass Sunstein was hired by Elena Kagan for the Harvard Law Fulty.
And in 2008, she said of Cass Sunstein, Cass Sunstein is the preeminent legal scholar of our time.
And you just heard the Cass Sunstein audio soundbite about net neutrality.
And he's a big pusher of this negative versus positive rights version of the Constitution.
I got a quick email.
Hey, dear Maha.
So when are we gonna have academic neutrality?
You know, a pop-up in the classroom when the teacher professors start spouting liberal propaganda.
Excellent.
Excellent thinking.
When are we gonna have academic neutrality?
They're not interested in it in the institutions they control.
Oh no!
They're not gonna allow neutrality in the classroom.
Far from it.
To the phones to Vernon, New Jersey.
John, hello.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Vernon Township Susansky County, New Jersey Ditto's home of the great Chris Christie.
Thank you, sir.
It's a great honor to speak to you, Al Maharashi.
I was just wondering last night if you or any of your staff picked up the Chris Matthews hardboiled show where he called for the nationalization of the oil companies.
Uh we did.
I didn't.
Uh paid staff uh came across it.
I found that just uh absolutely outrageous.
It is it it's it's really uh uh uh John, thanks for the call.
Um appreciate it.
It really, you know, Chris Matthews at one time, many years ago, guest hosted this program.
Chris Matthews has I I do not I don't know what's happened.
I know that he was uh chief of staff for Tip O'Neill.
I know he's always been uh full-fledged Democrat, but he's never been a radical.
I don't know.
I that something has happened.
Uh brain cells have been scrambled up there for some reason, because this is not the Chris Matthews that I've always known it, and the stuff I hear this guy saying in the past year, he's not the Chris Matthews that I've always known.
Well, I don't know, Snurdley.
Snerdley may have a point.
He thinks that I have pushed Matthews over the edge, along with a lot of other liberals in the media.
Here is what Matthews said last night.
Uh, he's basically asking for a dictator.
He basically wants Obama to do a Hugo Chavez.
Why doesn't the president when they're nationalized that industry and get the job done for the people?
There's a national interest in this, not just a BP interest.
We're letting BP fix a national problem.
And China, it's a more brutal society, but they execute people for this.
Major industrial leaders that commit crimes like this, failure like this.
This is a serious, serious problem.
Everybody says capitalism is great, unbridled free enterprise is great.
Look at it.
This is great, isn't it?
Uh I I frankly, folks, this is this is um.
Well, it's not normal.
I mean, this is this is delusional, deranged, or whatever.
Execute the CEO.
Uh nationalize the oil company.
Uh, what did he say?
Umbridled free enterprise is great, sarcastically.
I don't know where there is any unbridled free market capitalism going on.
The oil industry is one of the most regulated industries in the world and in this country.
And Chris, it was it was the Obama regime which gave this particular rig a safety award.
Uh really, we I I once I once said that I think I'm the reason that the mainstream media has become so partisan and been public now about who they are.
And apparently it's true in Matthew's case, just over the wants executions now, like in China.
How about just suicides, Chris, like in Japan?
Would that work?
We have more coming up on Elena Kagan and restricting free speech.
The various members of the Obama regime admitting they have not read the Arizona immigration law.
▲
Export Selection