All Episodes
Previous Next
May 17, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:39
May 17, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It wasn't long ago we were discussing China, poverty and China poverty in the United States.
I guess we've got this guy Michael Posner agreeing with the Chicoms that we have crime and poverty and homelessness.
This guy, yeah, you got a point.
Look at our Arizona law.
We do uh we have problems with racism and discriminate.
I mean, the Chikams have always ripped us, but this is the first time we've ever agreed with them.
So I got some people.
What do you mean, Rush?
You you always say this and you never back it up.
You always say that poverty in America is not like poverty anywhere else, that poverty everywhere else is worse and worse and worse.
Is that so many people want poverty to be so bad in this country?
Folks, let me let me try something here.
The relative wealth of the United States and the Chicoms.
According to the International Monetary Fund, if you want to believe them, in 2009, the per capita gross domestic product of China per capita, meaning per person, $6,567.
The per capita, gross domestic product, United States, 46,381.
Now, I don't care how you want to try to massage this.
It just it amazes me.
I make a statement totally true that poverty in this country is luxury in many places around the world, and they get angry at me for me.
They don't want that to be true.
I've never run into as many negative people who make people sick as the left.
You know, aside from the ideology, I think that's the one thing about them that ticks me off more than anything.
They're just negative all the time.
And they're negative about greatness.
And that's what's tough to ignore.
You try, but it's still tough.
Greetings and welcome back, Rush Limbaugh at 800 282-2882, email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Do you remember it wasn't long ago during the health care debate that uh we heard from Marjorie Margoli's Ms. Vinsky, uh, who lost her seat in Congress.
But it's okay, because her son is marrying Chelsea Clinton.
She lost her seat in Congress because she voted at the last minute for Clinton uh Clinton budget or something that uh that her district did not want, and in the next election she was sent packing.
They dragged her out during the health care debate as one of the many Democrats.
Look at I lost my seat because of health care.
I lost my seat, and and I I think you all ought to know that the only way you can save your seat is to vote for Obamacare.
Well, she'd been dragged out again.
They found her someplace, Andrea Mitchell, NBC News in Washington, speaking with former representative Marjorie Margoli's Mizvinski about the Senate Democrat primary race at Pennsylvania.
Mitchell says, How does it how does it feel?
You've been there.
You've been there on the other side of it.
How does it feel going into one of these things?
Do you see the wave coming?
I think they're more prepared for it now.
The Democrats were simply not prepared in 94.
They thought it was going to not be particularly good, but that was a real shocker.
Anyone in my class, uh the women in my class, everyone went in a marginal district, I was in a Republican district.
Everyone lost their seats.
So do you hear what Marjorie Margoli's Mizvinski said.
Do you understand what she's saying?
I think they're more prepared for it now.
That's right, that's what she's saying.
They're more for her to lose.
They weren't prepared in 1994.
Uh they were simply not prepared to lose in 1994.
It wasn't going to be particularly good, but it was real shocker to lose.
But now, I think the Democrats are prepared for it now.
So she they they bring her out as an expert on losing.
They bring her out as an expert on the feelings of losing.
Anyone in my class, uh, the women in my class, uh, everyone, uh everyone uh went in the marginal district.
I was in a Republican district, everybody lost their seats.
The women lost their seats.
Well, I know, but it wasn't just uh wasn't just women.
But so and she says life is great after you lose.
Life is great.
That was the that was the previous bite from back during health care.
Life's great after you lose.
Look at me, I'm still here.
My son is marrying the former first daughter.
How I mean life, and she's converting to Judaism.
I mean, I life could not get any better for me.
I think I heard that.
I I think she is.
Doesn't matter to me, but I mean I I I think I think so.
Maybe I'm confusing that with Trump's daughter.
I might be confusing her with Trump's daughter on that.
Regardless.
She's an expert in losing.
She's telling, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Democrats this year, they're prepared to get their butts kicked.
We weren't.
But they're ready for it.
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
Catty Kay, this is uh BBC.
Washington reporterette on the Chris Matthews Show.
And this the Chris Matthews show yesterday is an interesting study.
Uh in how the especially about NBC is a fascinating discovery or or uh examination of the way NBC covers the news and does business.
Which I'll get to here in just a second.
Catty Kay was quarried by Nora O'Donnell, who is the uh the sit-in host for Chris Matthews on his syndicated show yesterday.
She said, the politics of this, politics of this are tough.
Both political parties know they need to court Hispanic voters, and yet now we we have two-thirds of white voters say that they support the law.
So here the the template is both parties want these voters, but the Republicans, ladies and white white people support the immigration law in Arizona, how can this be?
In the NBC poll, as I understand it, people were actually read the contents of the law.
So there was no issue about we support this in principle.
They actually understood what the law did, and they still supported it.
Interestingly, the same number of Hispanics oppose this law.
And that's the number that Republicans really need to watch, because this may well play well in these midterm elections, and it may well play well in primary elections, where they are banking on a higher percentage of whites turning out to vote.
But when you get to 2012, and when you look at the longer term demographics of this country, Hispanics are on the rise, minorities are on the rise, and they are not going to like this law, and the Republicans are simply pushing Hispanics further into the Democratic camp.
There's no doubt about it.
Okay, so from the BBC, the Republicans are sealing their own fate by authoring the law in Arizona and by supporting it.
Really, we are sealing our own fate.
Despite the poll here, which shows 69, 68% of the American people, not just white Americans, support the law.
But somehow we are sealing our own fate.
And Ms. Kay wasn't finished.
She then had this to say about the financial crisis.
This is this morning, by the way, on Scarborough Show on MSNBC.
She said this about the financial crisis of 2008 and the recession that followed.
We hear a lot after the financial crash about people taking a new look at business and looking at best practices and how can we avoid that kind of crash again and a new form of capitalism.
But I wonder how real that shift is, and whether as we start to see the employment numbers grow here, and as we start to see the stock market do better, whether actually corporations won't just go back to their old ways and think we're going to be focused on the bottom line, and whether almost the crash has not been long enough for corporations to have a real adjustment here.
Oh, she's terribly worried, that isn't terribly upset.
Terribly worried the financial crisis wasn't bad enough.
It uh certainly wasn't bad enough to change American capitalism forever.
Uh it wasn't bad enough to get the corporations, even the corporations to uh to uh to forget uh focus on the bottom line.
Bottom line capitalism.
I mean, it's satanic, is it not?
And that damn recession, it just wasn't big enough.
It wasn't big enough to kill capitalism, and she's terribly upset.
Now, about this show in uh in general.
News analysts at NBC ignoring the news.
I think what they teach people at NBC is don't let the real news distract you from NBC's news.
There is NBC's news, and then there is real news.
And you at NBC, no matter what, if it's MSNBC or NBC Nightly News or your primetime show, you are to ignore the real news and forever promote NBC News.
Yesterday on Chris Matthews Sunday without Chris Matthews, uh Nora O'Donnell kicked off what I consider here a little experiment.
NBC analyzes news ignoring the news.
The first item they literally discussed Obama as a unifier.
And they had a roundtable discussion of Obama as a unifier.
Now that's not real news.
That is NBC news, but it's not real news.
Because Obama is the greatest D-vider.
He is the single greatest, most polarizing president we've ever had, at least in my lifetime.
But to say that to have a roundtable discussion on Obama as a unifier.
Next item.
They had a discussion.
Attorney General Eric Holder might challenge the Arizona law.
That's not the real news.
That's NBC news.
The real news is Holder has not read the law.
So we have an attorney general who is going to perhaps challenge a law he has not read.
The top cop, the top warrior, as Tom Brokaw would say, the top warrior in the country has not read the war that he is going to challenge.
But NBC news is Holder might challenge the law.
And then the panel chipped in.
They were asked if Obama's personal popularity would help liberal incumbents in the 2010 elections.
They had a panel discussion on that.
That is NBC news.
The real news is that in the last three elections, Obama's popularity is 0 for three.
New Jersey.
Scott Brown, Massachusetts.
Somebody tell me where there are Obama coattails.
Somebody tell Arlen Specter.
Arlen Spector wants Obama to come in and campaign for him, and Obama's saying essentially, uh, I'm not going to do that.
I'm going to put up with it on your own.
On your own.
So CTAC C stack is up, I think a couple of points, margin of error in this uh.
Yeah, I know one point says one poll says one point, another poll says two and a half or three points or whatever.
But Spectre, he wants Obama in there.
Obama's not going to go in there.
Now, if Obama, if if if if sorry, if Spectre was still a Republican, he'd be in there defending him.
But Obama's not going to go in there because Obama knows that most of the Democrat Party looks at Spectre as not a genuine Democrat.
C stack is.
So it's a no-win.
I don't care what happens in that race, Obama can't win.
And yet, on the Chris Matthews Sunday show, they discussed Obama's popularity.
And how, and if it would help liberal incumbents in the 2010 election.
Now, if you think NBC News is exclusive to NBC, wrong.
This is exactly how it's done at CNN.
This is exactly how it's done at the New York Times.
This is exactly how it's done, CBS, ABC, USA Today, the Washington Post.
USA Today has a story about all of the magnificent Obama achievements, and yet voters are unappreciative.
There aren't any magnificent Obama achievements.
There is a trail of destruction.
And you can only call those achievements if you are a died in the wool leftist or statist.
This is why, in part, ladies and gentlemen, it has been a perfect climate for EIB to spout and grow, because we deal with news As it is, we deal with reality.
They alter it, change it, ignore it.
They're losing viewers, add pages, add revenue.
Is it any wonder why?
Back after this.
Okay, we also now have some audio of Michael Posner and his apology to China.
This is last Friday in Washington at the State Department during a briefing on the uh U.S. ChICOM human rights talks.
The Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights, Michael Posner appeared before the gathered media, and he got a question.
Was there any area in which uh China sort of turned the tables and raised its own complaints or concerns about U.S. practices around the globe or at home?
Can you can you give some examples there?
Part of a mature relationship is that you have an open discussion where you not only raise the other guys' problems, but you raise your own and you have a discussion about it.
We did plenty of that.
We had experts from the U.S. side, for example, yesterday talking about treatment of Muslim Americans in an immigration context.
We had discussion of racial discrimination.
Did the recently passed Arizona Immigration Law come up?
We brought it up early and often.
It was mentioned in the first session as a troubling trend in our society and an indication that we have to deal with issues of discrimination or potential discrimination, and that these are issues very much being debated in our own society.
So here you have does this guy not sound like a new Castrati, by the way.
Yeah.
Part of a mature relationship is that you have an open discussion where you not only raise the underlying problems, but you raise your own.
And you have a discussion about it.
And we did plenty of that.
We we have experts from the U.S. side, for example, talk about how we uh mistreat Muslim Americans in an immigration context.
And we we we had a discussion in racial discrimination.
Did the recently passed Arizona Immigration Law come up?
Yes.
We we brought it up ourselves earlier often.
Uh, it was mentioned in the first session as a trumbling trend in our society, an indication that that we have to deal with issues of discrimination or potential discrimination, and that these uh uh if you uh very much being debated, I don't have to thought anything.
Uh we uh basically agreed with the ChICOMs that we thuck.
I'm just saying myself that Chicom's are sitting there unbelieving what they are hearing.
You know, they're they're just issuing boilerplate, they're sitting there, you guys you tell them telling us that we're rotten.
Look, you got poverty, you got racism, you got a discrimination, and look at what you're doing, you're treating it uh Mexicans and the Chinese.
Yes, we agree.
And who's him tell us ho ho ho ho ho ho laughing?
Probably tried to keep from laughing.
Imagine when they broke and a ChaiCom's back to their own room.
Can you imagine with high fiving everybody?
Uh man.
As I say, this Michael Posner, Assistant Secretary, said appointed by Obama.
The Chicoms always rip us to shreds.
This is the first time we've agreed with them.
In fact, we didn't wait to agree with them.
We brought up how rotten we are first.
Now, one of the saddest parts, if I may shift gears for a moment, one of the one of the saddest parts of banking reform.
Uh this the banking reform bill that the uh Senate just couldn't figure out how to deal with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
It's just the big, the two big gigantic problems, and they couldn't figure out how to deal with that.
They know how to deal with Goldman Sachs, they know how to deal with Wall Street.
They guess can't figure out how to deal with.
Fannie Mae Freddie Mac, Representative Paul Kandorsky, Democrat Pennsylvania says it's too complicated to figure those two out.
He actually said it's too complicated to figure out Fannie Mae Freddie Mac.
Now, since since when have we accepted that a government-sponsored program's too complicated to be fixed?
Too complicated for our elected officials to figure out with all the resources and information available to them from private and, yes, the public sector.
It's too complicated to figure out.
It's easy to figure out.
and Now, this is not what the Founding Fathers envisioned in creating the greatest government design in the history of man.
This is a long way from limited government.
And we got two runaway mortgage industries here, agencies.
And the Democrats say it's too complicated.
Figure them out.
Thank goodness for me, thank goodness for the Heritage Foundation.
Join the Heritage Foundation.
You want to be in concert with 640,000 like-minded conservative individuals who are no longer shaking their heads at this nonsense, actually funding good ideas and action to change it.
I know everybody.
Everybody always asks you for money.
The RNC asks you for money.
I don't see the payoff.
You will with the Heritage Foundation.
It's just $25 a year.
When you join, you're going to receive Cliff Notes version of the Federalist Papers, which is a great thing.
The Cliff Notes version of the Federalist Papers will advance your knowledge of this Constitution and this government far beyond anything else you could do.
And when you join, you get that version.
It explains America's first principles, the origins of constitutional government, chock full of quotes from our founding fathers.
It's an AskHeritage.org.
That's where you go to join online.
Askheritage.org.
And yeah, you can ask them questions too.
You don't have to sit there and just read what they spew out.
You can ask them to spew out something for you.
It's like being able to walk in there.
I mean, they're not going to write the term paper for you, but they will answer a question.
Ask heritage.org.
Okay, uh, we finally have a resolution of the uh deportation case of Obama's Aunt Zetutti.
U.S. uh immigration court has granted asylum to Obama's African aunt, Zetuti, allowing her to stay in the country, her attorney said today.
Her attorney, by the way, is Margaret Wong of Cleveland.
The decision was mailed on Friday, comes three months after Kenya native Zetuti Anjongo, the half-sister of Obama's late father, testified at a closed hearing in Boston where she arrived in a wheelchair, and two doctors testified in support of her case.
Now, while she was here awaiting all this, let's she had a hip replacement and a number of other medical procedures, and we're told that illegals uh uh put pressures on emergency rooms.
I don't think Aunt Zatuti got a hip replacement at no, no, no, Obama didn't pay for it.
Are you kidding?
You lost your mind in there.
We paid for it.
Obama paid for it, Obama's brother still living in a hut in Kenya.
Now, here's the AP report.
The basis for Aunt Zatuti's asylum request hasn't been made public, but people who seek asylum must show that they face persecution in their homeland on the basis of religion, race, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a social group.
Now, one of her family members is in charge over there, at least in the village.
One of one of Obama's aunts or cousins had the only electricity and running water there, where his half-brother lives in a hut with uh with no water or electricity.
Uh Anzatuni moved to the United States in 2000.
Her first asylum request was rejected.
She was ordered deported in 2004, but she didn't leave the country.
She continued to live in public housing in Boston.
Ant Zatutti's status as an illegal immigrant was relieved uh revealed just day before Obama was elected in 2008.
Uh Obama said that he did not know Aunt Zatuti was living here illegally, and that he believes that laws covering her situation should be followed.
A judge later agreed to suspend her deportation order and reopen her asylum case after Obama's immaculation.
But Obama, who knows how to reform the health care system.
Obama who knows how to run car companies.
Obama, who has the answer to everything, did not know his Aunt Zatuty was living here illegally.
In his memoir, Dreams from My Father, a story of race and inheritance, Obama affectionately referred to uh Anyango as Aunt Zatuti and described meeting her during his 1988 trip to Kenya.
Uh Aunt Zetutti helped care for the president's half-brothers and sister while living with Barack Obama Sr. in Kenya.
So he meets her in Kenya in 1988, and somehow she ends up here in uh in 2000.
Obama did that's like Paul Kandorsky's family may for any man.
Too complicated to figure out.
Congress created them.
Healthcare bills too complicated to figure out, too.
Congress created it.
Listen to this audio sound bite from Paul Friedman.
Oh, Thomas Friedman.
Thomas Friedman, last night on PBS Charlie Rose show on PBS.
Charlie Rose said that we're looking in the next several years at the most stern challenge to leadership in the political class we've ever seen, right, Tom?
You know, Charlie, for sixty years you could really say being in politics, being a political leader was on balance about giving things away to people.
That's what you did most of your time.
I think we're entering an era.
How long it'll last, I I dare not predict, where being in politics is going to be more than anything else about taking things away from people.
Um, that's the way he looks at it, taking things away from people.
The American people will head to the polls in November to stop this madness of giving things away, which Friedman loves.
Friedman loves the notion of giving things, but it's gonna be really tough to be a leader now.
Oh, it's really frightening.
It's gonna be really scary.
It'd be tough to be a leader because now we're gonna take things away from people.
Oh, oh no.
Who would want to do that, Charlie?
Who'd want to do that?
Charlie says, Yes.
Well, you know, we are PBS.
We need your pledge.
Without your pledge, we may not dust.
Speaking of taking things away from people, budget squeeze padlocks fifty-five parks and historic sites in New York.
Officials at the Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation say the agency today will start shutting down or keeping closed forty-one parks and fourteen historic sites across New York.
Parks officials say parking lot gates and restrooms are being locked, and anyone venturing onto the properties will be axed, asked to leave.
Governor Patterson and Parks Commissioner Carol Ash announced earlier this year that dozens of the state's 178 parks, 35 historic sites, would have to be closed, and others would have their services reduced because of New York's budget deficit now estimated at 9.2 billion.
Oh, yeah.
Close the parks.
Uh to close the historic sites.
We're not going to get rid of the 15,000 redundant people in every school system.
No, we're going to close the parks.
We're going to tell people how.
And next it's going to be the cops.
And next it's going to be the teachers.
And next is going to be the firemen.
Back to the phones we go.
We're going to go to uh Long Island.
This is uh this is Rob.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Nice to have you on the program.
Hey, Ross, how are you doing?
Very well, thank you.
Hey, uh great segue.
Um, I was uh calling in because I wanted to talk about that, and I just think that I I wish that you would just spend a week just exposing the ridiculous entitlements born to the state county workers uh here in New York, where I I heard over a four-year period it's actually a sixty billion dollar budget deficit,
and that New York was given fifty-three billion dollars already in two thousand and eight as a safeguard to hold itself over while they figured out their budgets, and now that's gone.
And now there's no discussion of any kind of entitlement reform with respect to defined benefits.
Um, they're gonna cause the parks.
That's uh that's a drop in the bucket, Rus.
Um, and uh the uh the health plan for the state and county workers, it's going to something like nine hundred and fifty dollars for singles and eighteen hundred for families.
Where that's that's nowhere near reality in the private sector.
Just to give you an idea.
If you had an index to the private sector for the public sector, New York State for 1.2 million state workers, you'd save $8 billion right there.
You'd have money for your uh your uh security in Times Square.
And there was an article uh by Amy Merrick in the Wait, wait, wait.
Wait, I'm missing some of what you're saying.
What what you said if there's an index, the private what do you mean by that if there's an index?
Well, I've always felt it's unfair that, for example, uh a guy like Captain Sullenberger, who was uh responsible for probably uh what, 300,000 lives of a given year, uh transporting people on an airplane, his union was exposed to market forces.
His union went bankrupt.
His union had to reschedule all their benefits.
Oh.
Yeah, well.
Um But if you're in the public sector, there's never any kind of rescheduling.
Oh no, there's not no no cutbacks, no you it look at New Jersey.
The governor's just would you just get back one and a half percent, just one percent?
Keep your job.
No way.
We have it No way, but the but the here's the problem.
All of these people, all these things you're talking about, are a net drain on the private sector.
There is no productivity going on here.
There's nothing being produced.
You're you are absolutely you're you're you're gonna have no growth.
Eight point eight million people lost their jobs.
That's a hundred and sixty football stadiums filled with people.
And when they're I'll tell you what's gonna happen in New York.
I'll tell you what's gonna happen.
Well, it's yeah, it might even happen in New York City eventually.
If this doesn't stop, what what i i it may not get all the way, but what's gonna happen is everybody's gonna leave except the people on the dole.
You got it.
And then what are they gonna do?
When everybody leaves, who's Patterson gonna tax?
He can close every park in the world because uh nobody's gonna be able to get to him anyway.
Well, California's looking at the same thing.
People are leaving California in droves pretty soon.
And and and Villa Garrosa saying, Oh, yeah, well, illegals are adding to our economic might here in the city of Los Angeles.
Everybody's the only people left are gonna be those on the dole.
And who's gonna pay for them?
I read I read somewhere it was fifty-seven trillion dollars of unfunded defined pension benefits to state workers across the country.
It's just not real.
Yeah, well, guess who's on the hook for that?
Well, me.
That's right.
Us and all that stuff's gonna be offloaded to federal government.
Now, not a hundred percent of it won't be, but the taxpayers of California, New York, and the rest of the country are on the hook for this stuff.
And it's at some point, you know, you have Atlas Shrugged.
Uh I'm not not paying them, I'm leaving.
Uh I I'm uh it makes no point.
It makes no sense for me to work and give up eighty percent of it to support these other people who are not doing anything.
I'm gonna do it.
Then where are we?
Brief time out here, folks.
Thanks for the call out there, Bob or Rob.
We'll be right back.
Well, folks, an Oregon guy is in jail, accused of stealing the identity of a three-year-old murder victim.
Three-year-old murder victim's identity was stolen.
Jason Evers was kidnapped from the Powell Crosley YMCA in Springfield Township twenty-eight years ago.
Another guy is now running around claiming to be Jason Evers.
He was arrested over the weekend in Boise, Idaho on federal passport charges.
Uh cops don't even know his real name.
Uh Oregon television station, eyeball Channel 12 News, Angela Ingram spoke with Jason Evers real family about this devastating news.
They just found out last week that the deceased identity are being stolen.
And I see stories like this all the time, and I I uh I just I wonder do these people have live luck.
Do they have as as as much as this is happening, with as much frequency as identity theft is being reported?
Why doesn't everybody have life luck?
I mean, it's just ridiculously cheap.
They're the best out there that there is protecting your identity.
I mean, there's a lot of competitors, but they're the best, and they don't sell your information like some of their competitors do.
You're not gonna end up in a mailing list when you uh when you register when you subscribe to to LifeLock.
And they have the best identity uh alert system that there is.
Oftentimes they catch people in the act and prevent the identity from being stolen.
Nobody's gonna stop it totally, but the best deterrence here is life lock, uh, and you get ten percent off the ridiculously cheap price just by mentioning my name.
Phone number to call is eight hundred four four oh four eight three three.
Life luck, eight hundred four four oh four eight three three.
Larry in Moore, Oklahoma, great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Thank you very much.
I'd like to address the Supreme Court ruling you were talking about earlier.
Yes.
Regarding continued detention.
Yes.
Aren't they in effect just holding persons beyond their legal obligation, the time served because of their sexual orientation?
I mean, you serve your time, but we're not going to we're not going to let you go.
We're going to keep you for treatment until we get your mind right?
Uh well what do you mean sexual orientation?
Well, I mean it's a it's a fundamental rule of liberalism that people are not responsible for the behaviors if they're born that way or if you know whether brought up a certain way or they're just you can't impose your values on the Yeah, but I don't think this applies to just any kind of s of of sexual orientation.
I think it's anybody who's considered dangerous sexually and the if you read the ruling it is precisely to keep them there to give them further psychiatric treatment even if it's judged they need it even after their terms are complete.
That's as as I understand it sitting here now.
Yeah well I I mean I can see that and I'm using absurdity to illustrate the absurd but you know it's kind of like tantamount to creating a re-education camp.
We can't hold Islamic fascists because of their potential behaviors but we can hold you know someone else because of their personal private behavior and that's you know a war cry of liberalism that that's a personal snerdly came into my office this morning.
Well my office is my studio he came in here and he said how can this happen?
Well what is how don't understand how can they I said what was the decision?
What was the vote?
So we started looking through the story and I saw I thought it at first was a 5-4 decision.
Then I learned it was 7-2 and then it all became clear did I not make it clear to you you still don't understand it.
You have to understand sex, feminism all this is a political thing sexual deviance, as far as the left are concerned, are largely men.
They are predators they abuse daughters and their wives remember all these silly statistics about wife abuse, uh spousal abuse on Super Bowl Sunday because dad getting ticked off his team is losing.
So he beats up mom.
And we found out all that was a crock of BS.
So there is a for every one of these cultural news items, cultural issues, there is a left wing template a prejudice.
It's just like the experiment we did moments ago with NBC News and real news.
NBC News is they have a panel discussion on Obama's popularity and how will that help Democrats get reelected in 2010?
Or Eric Holder's going to maybe step in on the Arizona law.
The real news is Obama has no popularity and he's losing states where he goes in a campaign for Democrats.
The real news is that Obama's attorney general has not read the Arizona law in in this case the assumption is I don't think this has anything to do with homosexuality, Frank.
I don't think it the exact opposite of that I I think this this has to do with a template or a bias or a prejudice or whatever that feminism has inculcated into the minds of liberals that most men are predators.
And they might not even be fixable.
They might not even be correctable and as far as and we now use the terrorist analogy well we have to do is examine what the left says the left is going out of its way to apologize for our treatment of Muslim terrorists.
What's his face Holder will not even use the term Islamic terrorism or radicalism.
So we got we got to be careful we don't make those people man offend those people for whatever reason but you know sexual predators yeah that's scourge and we got to get rid of them.
So it's if you just if you look at the traditional liberal bias and bigotry on any issue, you'll find out why they do the things that they do.
Okay, remember, folks, uh some primaries are taking place tomorrow.
The media, state-controlled media, has got their eagle eyes on these primaries, looking for any way possible to spin the results as anything other than what they mean.
There is a conservative ascendancy, there is an anti-liberal socialist tendency in these elections.
The Democrat side, throw those out.
▲
Export Selection