All Episodes
Previous Next
April 7, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:38
April 7, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No sooner do I ask how long is it gonna take for the media to start blaming the regime and Obama for the mine disaster in West Virginia.
And I come across a blog that says the mining company's CEO is a Tea Party guy.
They're blaming the Tea Party.
The left is already blaming the Tea Party.
They're blaming CBS is blaming uh global warming for the disaster.
And others are blaming capitalism.
The quest for profit is the reason for these mining disasters.
Or this one.
This one, of course.
Uh, greetings, folks, and welcome back, Rush Limbaugh.
Glad to have you here at 800-282-2882.
Email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
I found this in a blog called J.E. Deckert or Jed Eckert.com.
I'm not sure how to pronounce it.
And the blogger says apparently the left will stoop to any level in order to make a cheap political point with a horrible accident ongoing and the fates of some miners still not known.
The propagandists have already begun linking the West Virginia mining disaster to Tea Parties, global warming, and capitalism.
At Crooks and Liars.
They're the ones that are putting out the notion that this guy blankenship, by the way, he's and he's committed another crime, too.
He's on the board of directors of the Chamber of Commerce.
Yeah, that's that's reported as though that's a strike against him.
Oh, yeah, he's one of those guys, Chamber of Commerce guys.
That means he's for big profit at the expense of the working man.
Uh, and they claim that he has um uh been involved with the Tea Party movement, and there's no evidence.
CBS News uh bashes the mine owner for denying man-made global warming, the associated press.
Big profits linked to deaths.
Salon headline, how to connect mining disasters and climate change.
Uh this is perfectly understandable.
It's every event, every catastrophe, is somehow linked to an agenda item of the regimes.
There's no rest.
There's there's not a moment's rest that we can take.
As I was saying before I got distracted on a dog story uh last hour.
I was up very late last night, and I don't remember even who I was chatting with.
I have four or five different chats going on, and whoever it was asked me, hey, by the way, what do you think of Obama uh targeting this cleric over in Yemen with a drone attack?
What do you think of that?
And I said, Well, that's uh that's an easy call for Obama.
This guy's an American.
Easy to wipe him out.
So I get up today and I read this piece by Andy McCarthy, National Review Online.
Obama O'Kay's targeted assassination of Olachi, a U.S. citizen.
This is a guy that the Imam that counseled the uh Fort Hood shooter and some of the 9-11 hijackers.
Uh this is obviously the right call, McCarthy says.
We are at war against Al-Qaeda, uh, not Islamic extremists, uh radicals, uh, under an authorization from Congress.
And war.
Al Waqi, a purportedly American-born Islamic cleric who is now operating in uh Yemen, uh, probably directed the would-be Christmas bomber believed to be orchestrating and recruiting for violent jihad operations against the U.S., the president is the commander-in-chief with primacy on questions regarding the conduct of war.
Even if we were to accept for argument's sake that at issue is a legal rather than a political judgment, Supreme Court precedent uh holds that American citizens who fight for the enemy in wartime may be treated as enemy combatants just like aliens.
So, exactly what I said.
Easy call.
The guy's an American, so of course we can wipe him out.
The only reason for calling attention to Obama's targeting of this guy is its demonstration of the illogic of the left's position on treatment of the enemy.
According to the report, a U.S. regime official told Reuters, Olaqi is a proven threat and therefore somebody who could properly be targeted for killing.
But by leftist standards, including those urged by Attorney General Eric Holder when he was in private practice.
Olah is most certainly not a proven threat.
He hasn't been convicted in a court of law.
This administration says they haven't done anything until we've convicted him.
Well, this guy hadn't even been charged.
This guy hasn't even read his Miranda rights, and we're going to kill him.
And yet the guy and his henchmen who blew up the World Trade Center are going to get a civil trial.
Originally it was going to be in New York City at 200 bucks a year for security costs.
So you tell me, if you're if you're outraged because I said, Oh, this is an easy call for the regime, this guy's an American.
Well, American citizens who fight for the enemy may be treated as enemy combatants.
Demo.
So you send the drone over there and you wipe the guy out.
But if he's not an American, boy, you got a memorize him, we gotta charge him.
And you have to give him a trial in court.
As uh McCarthy writes, here's the uh here's the regime's position.
If an alien enemy combatant, such as Khalid Sheikh Mohammed mass murders 3,000 Americans, is then captured outside the U.S. in wartime, we need to bring him here and give him a civilian trial with all attendant due process rights.
If an alien enemy combatant is sending emails from outside the U.S. to an al-Qaeda cell inside the country, the commander in chief needs a judge's permission on a showing of probable cause to intercept those communications.
If an American terrorist, American citizen terrorist outside the U.S., say Olachi in Yemen, is calling or emailing the U.S. or any place else, the commander in chief needs a judge's permission to intercept those communications.
If we capture an alien enemy combatant conducting war operations against the U.S. overseas, we have to give him Miranda warnings, a judicial right to challenge his detention as a war prisoner, and quite likely a civilian trial.
But, according to the regime now, if the commander in chief decides to short circuit the whole menu of civil rights by killing an American citizen, that's fine.
No due process, no interference by a judge, no memanda, no nothing.
He's a proven threat because wait for it, the regime says so.
Now, interestingly, McCarthy says, This is the way we ought to be doing it with all these guys.
So he is begrudgingly giving the regime credit here, while at the same time pointing out the uh uh hypocrisy of it all.
New York Times has the story.
The Obama administration has uh taken extraordinary step of authorizing the targeted killing of an American citizen, the radical Muslim cleric Anwar El Olachi, who is believed to have shifted from encouraging attacks on the U.S. to directly participating in them, say intelligence and counterterrorism officials in the regime.
So that's the story.
That's the backstory to it all.
Uh, and so yeah, kill him as an American, no problem.
What the law says we can do.
So he's he's not a native Muslim, you see.
He was born in America, but he's not a Muslim out there.
Uh he became a Muslim when he left the country, supposedly.
I don't know what that's the reasoning.
But nevertheless, I wonder does Alan Greenspan, has he figured out that he's got no place in the future in this regime, because there are hearings going on a super blue ribbon panel looking into the housing boom, and he told them the truth yesterday.
Former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan chastised the critics, actually did this this morning by pointing out that Congress pushed the Federal Reserve to make sure lending to poorer Americans kept rising in the 2000s.
In other words, Greenspan told these investigators today, look at Congress, meaning Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, and a whole bunch of others, told us to keep the subprime loan process going.
In fact, they told us to ratchet it up.
Greenspan actually told the truth about this whole problem.
Uh you know what happens to people inside Washington who tell the truth about the regime?
This is not good.
He said if the Fed as a regulator had tried to thwart what everybody perceived as a fairly broad consensus that the trend was in the right direction, homeownership was rising, and that was an unmitigated good, then Congress would have clamped down on us.
But they didn't.
There's a presumption of the Fed's an independent agency, it is up to a point, but we are a creature of the Congress.
And if we had said we're running into a bubble and we need to retrench and stop this, they would have said we haven't a clue what you're talking about.
He's saying Congress doesn't listen to us anyway.
They do what they're gonna do.
So there he is what we all know.
He just laid this at the feet of uh Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.
It's L. Rush Ball with a brief obscene profit break.
Be right back, folks.
Well, it's come to this.
The Los Angeles mayor, Antonio Villaragosa announced that uh all city departments except the cops, public safety, and those that make money.
I wonder which ones those are must close two days a week because of the city's budget crisis.
They're out of cash.
On Monday, City Controller Wendy Gruel warned we told you about this, uh, that Los Angeles will be unable to pay employees or vendors within a month.
She urged the city to transfer 90 million from its reserves.
City's financial crisis worsened this week after the Department of Water and Power failed to make a $73 million payment to the city.
The agency says it needs to raise rates significantly to make such a What in the hell has gone on out there?
My God, folks.
This state is an utter fiscal disaster.
The utility can't pay the separ I guarantee you nobody's not paying the utility.
If so they're not paying the utility, they're getting cut off.
What's the utility doing with the money that people are paying them?
There's also a story in the stack today that three California pensions are underfunded by a total of 550 billion.
That is over a half a trillion.
The uh personal employee retirement or the uh public employee retirement system in Hawk, the pension.
This is the pension and healthcare.
They don't have the money.
The state teachers retirement retirement system, such as Pers and Stirs, and there's one other.
Five hundred and fifty trillion dollars underfunded in the pensions.
Now those people that are public teachers and public employees have been contributing to this.
They have directors that oversee both of these agencies to invest and grow the funds in the pension plan.
What the hell has been going on?
Schwarzenegger ordered this review because he wanted to find out what it was all about.
It's worse than anybody.
Imagine the somebody at Stanford University did the research, did the study.
The city of LA shutting a tr billion billion, yeah.
Half a trillion.
City of LA shutting down two days a week?
The utility in arrears for 73 million dollars to the city.
And I bet this is only the tip of the iceberg.
When you look at the whole state's fiscal situation, good.
What what?
Has the whole thing been a house of cards?
Has ever since since the left took over and been running that state, has everything been phony?
Have they just been spending money left and right on all their union buddies when their money has never been there in the first place?
That has to have been what's happened.
It's just like what's happening in Washington now.
We don't have any of the money we're spending.
We don't have any money to build schools in Islamic radical Muslim countries.
We don't have money to give them health care.
We don't have money to start building roads and bridges.
We don't even have the money to do it in our country.
The whole state of California must be a house of cards.
Well, I tell you what, I hope you don't have any LA municipal bonds, folks.
Uh nothing's worth anything out there.
Nothing's real.
Five hundred and fifty billion dollars underfunded pension plan.
And these are great and courageous union workers.
Thirdly, the official program observer has a question.
Who else do you think is going to certainly he wants to know if we have to pay for it eventually.
Yeah, I'll tell you what's going to happen.
And I'll tell you why I think some of this is by design.
As we have to bail out the states, as the federal government has to bail out the states, what does that mean?
It means that local control has failed.
This whole process is going to enrich and further expand the already over-the-top unacceptable power of the federal government.
When we start bailing out states, and that's the only thing we can do here with money we don't have.
Now your great grandchildren's taxes are being spent.
That means that whoever is in charge of the federal government when it happens is, look, you people of California have proven that you can't run the show.
We're going to take it over.
Now you're still going to have a governor and you're still going to have this, but you want to do anything, you got us get us to sign off on it.
Meanwhile, the federal government is becoming more and more and more unpopular, yet it is amassing all of this power.
And the regime stands to expand itself even further if we have to start bailing out states like California.
I'm going to put this $150 billion in perspective.
I need to find the story.
I'll do that in a break.
But I want to go to grab a couple of phone calls here.
We'll start in Sandy Springs, California.
And Mark, great to have you here, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, that's Sandy Springs, Georgia.
Uh you're right.
Uh we have an antiquated, I mean, the font on this thing is like 1988.
You know, like those green screen computers used to be.
And so I'm sorry, I I knew there wasn't a Sandy Spring, California.
No problem, but uh the great thing about Sandy Springs is we created the city a few years ago and privatized everything.
So all our public employees are private contracted employees.
We don't have pension problems.
So we're not gonna have the problems they have out in California.
What's the uh what's the population of Sandy Springs?
It's about ninety thousand.
Really?
That's you've got a privatized city that big.
That's right.
We are a model.
Did you bill from scratch or did you secede from Atlanta?
We seceded from Atlanta.
That is correct.
After thirty years of fighting, we're I remember this.
Yes.
We had calls from people in your yet-to-be-named town uh on this program.
I remember that.
Well, uh, it's been very successful so far, and I uh expect it to just keep getting better.
Are you accepting new residents?
Sure.
You are.
Uh you say got good health care.
I'm sorry, uh we get good he we got some of the best hospitals in the country here.
Yeah.
Well, I didn't have to fly all the way to Hell's Half Acre to try it's right there in Sandy Springs, Georgia.
That's correct.
But Dresh, I wanted to talk about our our Treasury clown, uh Geitner going out through Asia with hat in hand, begging these uh the Indians and the Chinese and wherever else he's going to buy our debt.
I don't think people really uh can conceive exactly how much uh 1.5 trillion dollars is, and that's what our deficit is projected to be this year.
And we're issuing uh, you know, 75, 100 billion dollars of new debt every week, and after a couple of bad auctions, all of a sudden he's off to Asia and China, uh, you know, begging them to buy our debt.
If they don't keep buying our debt, this country, I mean, you keep saying we don't have any money, we don't have any money.
They gotta they they are our bankers.
They're the ones who are providing us with the money to pay our troops, to pay our bills, to build our roads, to do whatever it is the government does.
And uh, if they stop buying our debt, treasuries are gonna get hammered and it's gonna be Jimmy Carter years all over again this time on steroids, and that's just gonna lead to massive tax increases.
Even Volker was out there yesterday saying we need a VAT tax, an energy tax.
We've got to do something about these deficits, but they're not going to do anything about these.
Because the problem with the deficits is not taxation and insufficient taxation.
The problem with the deficits is out of control spending by the regime.
Right.
And they're not going to do anything about it.
It's just going to be worse.
And as you say over and over again, it it's got to be by design.
And uh one more point I'd like to make, you know, I'm breaking up these uh these big uh big banks and stuff, but the main mainstream media line is that Wall Street took over Washington.
That's wrong.
Washington took over Wall Street, and now they're using Wall Street to take over Main Street.
Exactly right.
Excellent timing.
Great call from Mark and Georgia.
All right, let's put this in perspective out there.
$535 billion shortfall in the state pension plans, at the state uh public employees' retirement system, the state teachers retirement system, and one other.
$535 billion is more than...
The gross domestic product of either Saudi Arabia, Sweden, Switzerland, or Poland.
Saudi Arabia and oil giant.
530.
I thought every sheik had 535 billion dollars, but they don't.
Five hundred thirty-five billion dollars unfunded, underfunded pension.
How does this happen?
And also on a related story, the pension plans at Obama Motors and Chrysler are underfunded by a total of 17 billion dollars and could fail if the automakers don't return to profitability.
And they aren't.
Obama Motors reported a first quarter loss of $4.3 billion.
Now what the hell was the bailout if not to protect these pension plans?
Wasn't the bailout of GM and Chrysler essentially to make sure that the union's health care plans stayed intact?
What'd they do?
Forget the fund?
The pensions?
They bailed out these companies for what, $25 or $50 billion?
There's still $17 billion underfunded in the pensions?
Now back to California, $535 billion.
It was never real.
It could never have been real.
Oh.
The money supply in California could never have been real.
They were printing money that well, they can't put it with spending money they never had.
It's like almost like the House Bank.
Back in the old days in the late 80s, didn't matter what your house banks or your salary was, you could write a check for unlimited amount on your account and never get an overdraft notice.
And it sounds like this is the way the Libs in California have been running the state.
How come?
How come these state pension plans, which include health care, are so expensive, and yet the federal health care system is gonna be so cheap?
How can the two be in the same sentence?
Oh, yeah, we're gonna reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars with Obamacare.
Yeah, right.
Uh-huh.
And yet just the public employees and estate teachers in California pension, underfunded $535 billion.
The truth of the matter is nobody's gonna notice if LA closes its offices for two days a week.
They're only gonna shut down non-essential people, right?
If they're non-essential, why are they there in the first place?
Remember when they closed the government because of snowstorms a bunch of times in Washington.
Two hundred and forty thousand non-essential people were told don't show up, including Congress.
If they're non-essential, why do you employ them?
Now they are gonna have a problem.
There will be people that will notice LA shut down for two weeks.
And that'll be the poor who line up for their benefits, and they're gonna be lining up in front of closed offices.
Remember, remember the The Rodney King riots.
You remember the uh you remember the there was a line that they were using in the uh state controlled media uh after the Rodney King riots.
They called the people standing in line for their welfare checks an example of the indomitable human spirit.
Well, the poor get their checks for a direct deposit now.
Well, what if you don't have a bank?
You s everywhere, even if you don't have a bank, they start a bank.
Well, look, I'm I'm just gonna tell you something.
I don't know.
If you're telling me that people don't line up in welfare offices all over the co they do.
And that's that's who's gonna notice it when LA shuts down for two days two days a week.
Otherwise, nobody nobody will.
Uh now.
Waitily's health care mandates kick in in California.
I mean, if you think it's bad now, wait till the Obama health care mandates kick in out there.
Because the states are going to have to pick up because uh of the of the uh uh health care bill, the states are gonna have to pick up an ever increasing share of Medicaid and Medicare.
All right, back to the phones.
People have been waiting patiently.
East Lansing, Michigan.
This is Kurt.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
How are you doing, Rush?
Very well, sir.
Thank you.
As a student in the uh Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I think I figured out why they're targeting the American cleric in Yemen.
Tell me.
Well, if they arrest him and put him through a civilian trial, and the terrorist act that he's associated with happened under Obama's watch, it would only embarrass Obama, wouldn't give them a chance to embarrass Bush.
Well, uh That's an interesting thought.
I have to give it.
This is what happens to you if you're a daily student here at the Limbo Institute.
A reason why we're not going to try this all Lockheed guy is because his testimony would rip into uh Obama, the regime.
Of course, they can handle that.
They could, I mean, they could take care of that.
I they could bring the guy in and they say, look, if you you want a lighter sentence, you just do what um all the others do and blame Bush.
Just do that and we'll look the other way uh at sentencing time.
I find it just hysterical that we even come up with these kind of theories to explain the regime.
But make no mistake, I mean, I'm I'm not I'm not being facetious, I'm not even really being cynical.
The law says we can kill an American citizen who joins the enemy.
We can kill.
We can't do that with an enemy who did not leave America.
We have to give them trials.
Uh who's next?
Scott in Santa Cruz, California.
Great to have you, sir, with us on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
How are you?
Very well, sir.
Thank you for having me on the show.
You bet.
How is the Czech Republic?
How did you know?
Well, you gave us some hints, and I put two and two together and figured out where you went.
What were the hints?
Well, you told us how far you were flying out and back.
Yeah.
And you told us you were looking for health care.
Yeah.
And from my personal experiences, I know that the Czech Republic offers a for affordable health care for foreign customers.
And I did a little math and figured out how far you could get with that amount of flying time, and well, it just lined up.
Well, now wait a minute.
Yeah, we are.
You compute the flying time, but at what speed.
Well, airliners all fly at a about the same speed.
It varies a little bit because of uh headwind or tailwind going across the Atlantic, and you specified that your f your flight time out was actually shorter than your flight time back, which would works out perfectly with going across the Atlantic as opposed to going west.
Yeah.
You're a smart guy.
Well, um, thank you.
I studied physics at the University of California at Berkeley, and I know that you've They actually taught you physics.
Yeah, actually.
It's a very good program, and I wouldn't say that for every program that they have, but the physics program is actually very good.
That's shocking.
That is shocking.
Well, the way you've calculated this is brilliant.
So personally, um I've been trying to start a family for five years with no luck, And found that the cost of uh uh in vitro fertilization in this country is incredibly high.
And my insurance, which I pay over five hundred dollars a month for, just for myself, I might add, uh, won't cover a dime of it.
So part of the reason that I knew about the Czech Republic is because that's where my wife has been going for our infertility treatments.
No kidding, it's cheaper there than it is here.
Much.
for one cycle of in vitro fertilization at my local clinic here in San Jose, if you want to be specific where the clinic is, $30,000.
Czech Republic, Czech Republic, Including flying there, staying at a hotel, the whole shebang cost me about ten.
Wow.
That's that's amazing.
The Czech Republic is actually a uh uh really bright spot on the globe.
Politically, ideologically, it really is.
But I didn't know that in vitro was that expensive here or that cheap over there.
I had no clue.
They don't tell you that at the breast center.
Now, Mark Stein, who was filling in for you, um, talked a lot about your trip, and I was a little surprised that you didn't um fill us in when you got back on Friday.
Well, he also said that whoever figured out who sorry, whoever figured out where you went would get to be a guest on your show.
Uh no, no, no.
That I would that was that's not what he said, and even if he had said it, if I don't say it, it doesn't have any credibility or weight whatsoever.
This show doesn't have we just showed but you have you look it.
You've gotten more time than most guests, well, we rarely have them, uh, get anyway.
I'll get myself out to Florida.
Give me a shot, Rush.
Uh I'm I'm not gonna hold you to what Mark said at all, but you know, give me a shot.
Oh, jeez.
Hey, you know, let's do this one, okay?
Uh you talk about poor science.
Well, I'm a scientist, and guess what?
I don't agree with the global warming consensus.
Well, that certainly qualifies that certainly qualifies you.
But uh the the uh uh I don't want you to take this personally.
I really don't want you to take this personally.
But I often say that don't try this at home.
Don't try the the great make everything they do look easy.
Uh and one of the ways to offend the great is for people that can't do it to assume it's easy.
Now you have not offended me, but you have to understand that I have a tremendous amount of respect for the audience and for the program, and I'm only gonna put seasoned broadcast veterans on the air as uh who've got a lot of experience at it uh as guest hosts.
There's too much at stake here to run auditions on this, but that's what small radio stations are for.
Uh I appreciate your your your spirit and I appreciate your uh willingness to ask uh for what you want.
Uh you might the cable news uh networks, a few of them are are serve the same purpose as small radio stations, proving grounds.
Uh most people never get out of them.
Uh but some do, and escape the surly bonds and to greatness.
Anyway, we're a little long here, got to take a brief time out.
Don't go away.
By the way, about the underfunded pension plans at CalPurrus and Cal Sturs.
Do you know who's liable for not?
Who do you think is liable?
Who do you mean who do you think has to make up the shortfall?
The taxpayers of the state of California.
And that 535 billion, do you think that's been added to the state's deficit?
And if we have to bail that state out, and and and this is just one state, New York is almost in as bad a shape as California is in.
I can see the day we're coming where we we we have to bail out or partially bail out some Of these states, and that's just going to expand the reach and the power of the regime in uh in Washington.
Pure and simple.
Now, uh, I checked email during the break.
Some of you think I was rude uh to the last caller who wanted a shot at guest hosting the program.
I, ladies and gentlemen, I that wasn't rude.
I was just speaking straight up.
I mean, having somebody with zero experience asking to host the most listened to media presentation in the country.
I mean, that would be just like some unskilled, unexperienced person wanting to be president.
And look where that got us.
I refuse to do what to this show, what Obama has done to this country.
No way, shape, manner, or form.
By the way, we, the taxpayers, the United States government, we are all liable for the underfunded pensions at Obama Motors and Chrysler.
It's on us.
Of course, everything the federal government does is on us.
They don't have any money till they privat or tax it or confiscate it from us.
Now, to show you just how I mean, literally insane, some people on the left are.
Or if not insane, we're not even on the same planet.
I want you to listen to the first two paragraphs of a recent column by Hurricane Katrina Vandenhoovel in the nation.
The challenge for progressives and Democrats in these turbulent times is how to consistently and clearly explain the real causes of our current economic condition.
One problem is that we live in a center-left country with a center-right media that consistently misinforms people about the perils of debt, deficits and tax increases, and purveys misinformation about a good but modest health care bill that right-wing talk radio, Tea Partiers and Republicans would have Americans believe is a socialist power grab.
Center-left country with a center-right media that consistently misinforms people about the peril of debt, deficits, and tax increases.
So let's go to the audio sound bites.
This is uh this is Chris Matthews last night on Hardball, and he had the uh uh Washington Bureau chief of the magazine uh Mother Jones on there, name is David Korn.
So keep in mind what uh Katrina Vandenhoov just said, and listen to Matthews here.
The problem is that we don't think in terms of what would the country would be like if we didn't have Medicare for our parents as they get very old in their 80s, for example, and they're still alive, and they need health care, a lot of it, and they don't have any source of income.
They're not working every morning, they're not making a paycheck.
What would it be like in this country?
Calcutta, poor people all over the place, old people lying in the streets.
I mean, we don't think about what it would be if we didn't have health care, if we didn't have Social Security for people at the age of 65, if we didn't have unemployment compensation, if we didn't have a progressive income tax.
There's a lot of things we don't think about.
And the right wing just pounds and pounds away at this idealistic notion of a cowboy country where everybody's self-reliant.
I think the progressives, for all their power on their blogosphere, have not done a positive case for the advantages of some kind of uh social state.
Well, Obama hasn't either.
So there you have it.
Um Matthew is admitting for all who watch MSNBC, of course, a much wider audience he's reaching now with his sound bite, that um they haven't they have a good enough job, they haven't been doing a good enough job explaining the social state, the positive case for the advantages of some kind of social state.
Chris, I talk to you a lot on this program.
Let me explain to you why.
It's not that they haven't done a good job, it's that they don't dare be honest that that's what they're doing.
If they had run the election on all the wonderful social schemes that you just described here, Obama wouldn't have gotten 30% of the vote.
If he had said, we're gonna socialize health care so that we don't look like Calcutta, and we're gonna expand on all these other programs that have made people dependent on the state, and we're gonna tax further the people who stupidly continue To work to pay for all the, he wouldn't have gotten 30% of the votes.
You people on the left who run for office have to lie through your teeth about what your plans are.
You go back and you look at what Obama was projecting and promising versus what we're getting, and you'll see my point.
I got told to turn four of my outsourced outdoor sconces off, and yet a turtle, which is supposed to be distracted by and go the wrong way when they see light, nevertheless, showed up on my beach right by my house and laid an egg or built a nest when my lights were on.
▲
Export Selection