All Episodes
Previous Next
March 22, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:38
March 22, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Howdy, folks, great to have you here.
Welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, and this is the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
For advanced conservative studies.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address L Rushball at EIV net.com.
All right, the uh the piece here in the American Spectator is a long and uh uh uh well not long, but I mean it's it's a uh it's a piece written about the the uh the prospects of the state lawsuits over mandates of coverage and so forth, mandates to buy insurance, uh succeeding at the Supreme Court.
And this is a tough slog because to get to the Supreme Court, you have to first get through a circuit court, uh uh uh uh probably a D.C. circuit, I think.
And the DC circuit has got a bunch of big government uh judges on it.
It's uh it's it's gonna be a tough slog to get to the Supreme Court.
But here's the here's the thing.
Of course, there are mandates.
And one of the things that Republicans are going to do in the Senate, by the way, in this when they take up the re reconciliation package, they are going to offer an amendment to allow fast tracking to the court for immediate judicial review of the legislation.
Now, Orin Hatch just on Fox said, I don't know anybody who'd vote against that.
Well, I do.
I do.
Try the Democrats who know they've written something unconstitutional who do not want judicial review.
That's who will vote against it.
Anyway, the piece is by Michael Philosoph.
Conservatives and Tea Partyers despondent over the fact that liberal Democrats have just passed a massive encroachment on our liberties over their massive protests should take hope.
By the way, I don't know why this popped into my head.
Howard Feynman, why aren't you angry?
Why you asking me why I'm angry?
I'm not really angry.
Well, we're determined here.
The American people didn't vote yesterday.
The Democrat Party did.
And they didn't vote the way the American people have expressed themselves on this.
And this is not insignificant.
But we are determined here.
But you ought to join us in being Howard's not gonna be mad because he's in a protected class.
He's uh state-controlled media, looked upon favorably by the very people he's whose agenda he helps to advance.
So why would he be mad?
James Madison saw things like this coming.
And his forethought will give opponents of Obamacare one last shot at killing it.
In Federalist number 10, Madison wrote, Enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.
And he got that right.
Knowing that the nation's future leaders would uh include usurpers and potential tyrants, Madison sought a way to preserve individual liberty despite them.
He thus devised the system of the separation of powers.
He wrote, Essential to the preservation of liberty, this is in Federalist 51.
It is evident that each department should have a will of its own, and members of each department should be as little dependent as possible on the other branches.
Passage of legislation by Congress and the signature of the president are not enough.
The next step is judicial review by the Supreme Court and independent and co-equal branch of government.
Already, the states of Idaho and Virginia have vowed to sue the federal government over Obamacare, and the passage of the legislation will doubtless spawn hundreds of other lawsuits as well, uh, primarily over the mandates.
It simply is not constitutional.
When we need this resolved for the federal government to demand citizens buy anything.
And this bill does that.
It mandates that you buy health insurance or pay a fine.
Madison was a brilliant enough thinker to understand that the separation of powers relied on more than each branch having the necessary constitutional means to resist the others.
The separation of powers provided each branch with the personal motives to resist the encroachment of others.
Ambition, he wrote, must be made to counteract ambition.
The interests of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the branch.
Thankfully, the court now has an axe to grind with Obama.
Remember the State of the Union Address in January, Obama took a cheap shot at the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United, upholding free speech and overturning key provisions of the McCain Feingold Law.
Congressional Democrats whooped and jeered at the court like obnoxious schoolboys.
Obama reamed them out on national TV to their faces when they can't respond.
The court was humiliated.
Justice Alito shook his head in disgust and muttered that the president's remarks were not true.
In March, Chief Justice John Roberts told an audience at the University of Alabama that the behavior of the President and the Congressional Democrats was very troubling and questioned why the Supreme Court should even bother to attend a political pep rally like that.
Roberts' remarks caused the White House press secretary Robert Gibbs to issue a snarky rebuttal again condemning the court's decision.
It may be that the individual mandate on Obamacare requiring all Americans to purchase health insurance against their will is unconstitutional.
But after the State of the Union dust up, the court has more than just technical legal motives to take up the case.
Madison lamented that reliance on personal motives and ambitions should be necessary to control the abuses of government, but understood that this was a reflection of human nature.
So the author here says, I'm hoping Madison's understanding of human nature was correct, and that Justices Alito and Roberts are chomping at the bit for the chance to get back at Obama and his congressional goons for the humiliation they inflicted on the court.
A decision striking down Obamacare authored by Justice Alito would be the ultimate smack now.
So there's wishful thinking.
It's a tough slog.
I don't, you know, the everything we got to do from this point forward is a tough slog.
Repeal is a tough slog.
Uh winning elections and taking control of the house.
Winning elections may not be that tough, but winning control of the House, that's going to be a tough slog.
I mean, these these people, my friends, they have acorn.
I mean, these are these are the people that engage in all kinds of election fraud, the Chicago way.
So it's going to be a tough slog to get there.
But there are 37 or 38 states that have 37 in the process of filing lawsuits.
Florida's on the verge of their legislature of agreeing to do it, but two of them so far have.
And there probably will be others along the way as well.
And this is why the Democrats are not out there doing a victory lap.
In fact, the Democrats, uh, the White House has announced they're going to be trying now to explain what this is to the American people.
Remember, Pelosi said we have to pass this so people find out what's in it.
There's also something that's not being said very much, but I want to say it.
Truth be known, the Democrats in the House do not at all like what they passed on Sunday.
The Senate bill.
They do not like it.
That's why it was never voted on.
It was never passed.
That's why they, because there was never going to be support for it.
But don't start feeling all good about that.
The reason they didn't like it is because it didn't go further left than it did.
Didn't have a public option in it.
That these people are idiots.
It's going to be a public option by default and by design, which is what Obama told that idiot Kucinich.
Who knows what else he got.
Now they face a battle over in the Senate with reconciliation.
The Republicans claim that there is a an impact on social security in this reconciliation bill, which disqualifies it from reconciliation.
Meaning that the Democrats are going to have to have 60 votes to pass this reconciliation bill.
But if you can't go reconciliation, then it's not a reconciliation bill.
Then if it gets changed, it's got to go back to the House.
For more arguments, it's that bill that has the 16,000 new cops at the IRS.
It's that bill that has all the investment income being raised on social the Medicare tax being raised and applied to stock profits, investment portfolio profits.
It's in the Senate bill at something like 2.2%.
This House Reconciliation Bill raises it to 3.9%.
Essentially, the House Reconciliation Bill raises capital gains and Medicare taxes on capital gains to an effective 25%.
Because capital gains goes 15 to 20, and all these other things get it close to 25%.
If The uh well, Obama's budget gets the capital gains up to 20%.
These two health care bills pull it all the way up to close to 25.
But that's they won't get all the way there unless they pass this reconciliation bill.
And if they run into trouble over there, it all depends on the parliamentarian.
If the parliamentarian says, Yeah, you guys, you really don't qualify here for uh reconciliation, still not out of the woods because the vice president can overrule the parliamentarian.
And though it would be nuclear to do it, it would not be the first nuclear blast to hit us.
What happened last night was.
So they're already and look at what they did.
Look at listen to Obama's sales pitch on Saturday afternoon at the House Auditorium in the just completed visitors' center, where Harry Reid says you can smell the tourists in the summertime.
Obama is sitting there and saying, Look, and so was Pelosi.
Look, you're gonna lose in November anyway.
You may as well go down with a ship voting for this.
You're gonna lose anyway.
And I kept thinking Bill Clinton was out there telling these people months ago that the only reason they had to hope for victory was passing it.
And yet here was their leadership admitting that they're gonna lose their seats, a lot of them.
So they may as well vote for it in the first place.
Before we go to the break, Ronald Reagan, 1964, articulated the same crossroads at which we find ourselves today.
Reagan gave this speech during the presidential campaign.
This was during the middle, we're right smackdab in the middle of the creation of Medicare that would be signed a year later, or in 1965.
So we faced similar circumstances.
This idea that government is beholden to the people that it has no other source of power except the sovereign people is still the newest and the most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man.
This is the issue of this election.
Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.
You and I are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right.
Well, I'd like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right.
There's only an up or down.
Man's old age dream, the ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order, or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism.
That's where we find ourselves.
And then he said some of the most famous words of his life.
You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
We'll preserve for our children this the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.
Chew on net, and we'll be right back.
Don't go away.
Welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Wonder what's going to happen.
Arizona cancels its S chip program, the children's health insurance program, just cancel it.
We don't have any money.
What's going to happen?
April 16th, out in the state of Washington, when Walgreens refuses to accept any new Medicaid patients.
The reason is they can't, the government reimbursement on the prescriptions that they fill are a losing proposition.
Walgreens is losing money on Medicaid prescriptions because the reimbursement has been cut.
What's going to happen when that actually starts?
When new Medicaid patients go into Walgreens in the state of Washington, and the pharmacists say, I'm sorry, but we are not taking any new Medicaid patients.
What's going to happen?
I predict to you the plan's already in the works.
Acorn and others will pretend to be these people.
They will take busloads and busloads of people to Walgreen stores.
They will protest and whine and moan, and they will accuse Walgreens of not caring about the sick and the poor.
And they will dump on them left and right.
This will attract the TV cameras.
And then the demonstrators will go to D.C. After they have harassed and hassled the people at Walgreens in the state of Washington, then they'll go to D.C. And they'll march and they will they will demand relief on this.
And Congress will then put in a mandate that all stores, all doctors, and all hospitals must accept Medicaid patients, regardless of their reimbursements.
What do you mean they can't do it?
They've just mandated that we all have to go out and buy insurance.
They've just they're making the doctors lose money, Mr. Sturdley, the reimbursement for doctors and a dock fix and so forth.
They haven't to work on that.
Go talk to doctors who are leaving Medicare and Medicaid because the reimbursements are such it doesn't even cover the expenses of an office visit half the time.
So that what do you mean they can't do it?
What in in in this in the in the in the House Reconciliation Bill, it clearly takes money from Social Security into some other medical program in order to play an accounting trick and supposedly save money.
Now the Byrd rule says that you cannot reconcile.
You cannot use reconciliation on anything involving Social Security.
It's an entitlement.
Clearly, I can read you the section if you want, takes money from Social Security and shifts it into this other health care plan, so they can say that it doesn't cost as much as it does.
Now there's only one way for the parliamentarian to rule.
Sorry, your bill does not qualify for reconciliation.
See here it says in the bird rule, but what's the parliamentarian likely to do?
House Republicans don't know.
Because folks, we have Democrats and we have rules.
And when those two things are present, the effect is there aren't any rules.
Witness the Constitution's rules have just been ignored in the health care bill.
So what if the parliamentarian says, yeah, you know, it does say that they're taking money from Social Security, putting it into another account, and a bird rule does say, you know what, I'm gonna go ahead and rule that this is constitutional.
I'm gonna go ahead and say that this fits Senate rules.
And Republicans, what are you talking about?
It's clearly a violation.
Nope, nope.
I just I I I I'm gonna I'm gonna say it.
It's it's good.
He's supposedly nonpartisan.
Who knows if if he if this if the parliamentarian, I don't know the guy, but the way things are going, everything's being stood on its head upside down these days.
Even if the parliamentarian has the guts to enforce the rule on this.
Along comes Biden, who can overrule a parliamentarian as the president of the Senate?
Oh, yes, he can.
Oh, yes, he can, and he'll do so.
Jack, Hot Springs, Arkansas.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
I finally got through.
Rush, I'm a retailer since 1965, and I'm in my fourth store right now, and I have lost five good quality American companies, uh, and three of the companies have written me letters saying they are closing their doors because they cannot compete with imports from China.
My my question is, why in the world can't we get some somebody in in our government with all of these Obama lackeys that'll figure out how to to bring uh jobs and and manufacturing back to America and uh by perhaps putting a uh increasing the duty on imports uh and tariffs uh it's terrible.
We're we're we're we're supporting the Chinese, and we're losing uh millions of dollars and millions of jobs in this country.
Have you have you heard of something called the uh national debt?
Yes.
Do you know who owns most of it?
Well, sure.
Well, there's your answer.
They run us.
Yeah.
And they want a growing economy.
That's why they're not gonna go Into any uh pollution emission controls.
That's why they're not gonna.
Uh the the ChICOMs, we say we're gonna slap tariffs on you, and they say, okay, well, go ahead.
We'll we'll just stop doing business with you altogether.
And by the way, we'll call in your loan.
Call it or call in some of the debt.
Well, Rush, I'll tell you what.
Uh, and you'll appreciate this.
A quick comment.
Uh, and you never heard this.
It was never reported by the media because the media weren't there.
Uh, I was in grad school, 1961 in Arizona.
Barry Goldwater came to speak to us uh at the bought 450 of us.
Large old auditorium, no air conditioning, the windows were open, doors were open.
When he was speaking, the only light was the light on his lectern where his notes were.
A moth.
A large moth came in there, attracted by the light, and it was distracting.
And he brushed it away a couple of times.
Finally, that moth landed right on Goldwater's notes.
And he picked it up by the wings and threw it on the floor and stepped on it.
He says, Those damn Democrats have spies everywhere.
He brought the house down.
I was wondering where you were going with this.
I was in there with with grads from all over the country, all political backgrounds, and he had everybody right in the palm of his hand.
And I'm not sure.
You'd be in jail today doing that.
Well, anyway, Rush, I appreciate uh.
Look, I'm not trying I'm not I'm not trying to avoid your question.
This is uh the uh look at your in business.
You know that the the markets always seek the lowest labor cost they can.
We don't have any leverage with the Chinese.
Zilch, zero nada.
They're in bed with the Iranians, too.
Back we are, Rush Limbaugh and the excellence in broadcasting network.
I look no, I'm not I wasn't trying to treat the previous caller with uh a lackadaisical attitude.
You could cut corporate tax rates to help domestic corporations, you could do any number of things.
Uh what I should have said, in addition to the fact we have very little leverage with the Chicoms, the dirty little secret is President Obama doesn't care.
Look, I want to I want to keep my tone measured here, because I've I do want this to be heard as rationally as I'm saying it.
The objective is to inflict harm on the private sector of this country.
It is the purpose.
Companies closing down, canceling uh their manufacturing base because they can't compete with Chicom labor, no big deal to Obama.
Doesn't bother him.
As far as Obama's concerned, this country's got a lesson to learn.
This country has got to learn that it can't run around the world and bully and steal from everybody else.
We gotta get cut down to size.
We gotta learn what living in pain is really like.
The same kind of pain Obama believes this country has caused other people, including other Americans.
No, this is get even with the country time.
The more the more pain the better, as far as he concerned, because that's that's more chaos.
Anybody, is there anybody out there who thinks the stimulus plan worked?
Is there anybody who thinks it is working?
Okay.
No, of course not.
Well, that's what this health care bill needs to be compared to.
Anybody think this is gonna work?
Did the TARP thing work?
No, didn't work.
Plain is Dana Snerdley, Snerdly just said, okay, all knowing.
I got a question for you.
Since the Democrats have passed this, doesn't that mean the end of that page in their playbook where for everything going wrong in the country, they can bring up all these sob stories filled with people who say, Oh my god, I love my health care, and I can love my job and I love my carbon.
Oh, it doesn't mean the end of that at all.
They gave us Medicare to fix a problem, and guess who's fault it is now?
It's the doctors, it's the insurance companies.
They gave us social security, and guess whose fault that is.
This is what I said earlier in the program.
The day is over.
This is why we need genuine conservatives running for all the day is over where they get all the benefits of these entitlements in terms of attitude, but they don't pay any price for it.
They deserve to own all of the breakage.
They have broken all of these things.
They own it.
And we need to have people start saying so, other than on the radio.
So this isn't gonna work.
There are gonna be sob stories left and right.
There are gonna be people who don't get health care, their premiums are gonna go too high, they're gonna be people denied coverage.
And even though it's the Obama government that's going to be responsible for all that, they're gonna still bring these people up because we'll need to fix the legislation even more.
Oops, you know what?
We we need to take care of this so this doesn't happen to any more American families.
They'll use the sob stories to expand and build on this.
They're not through here.
But as long as they've got the media on their side, they always get the benefit of creating these things.
Though it's it's the line I always use.
They don't want to be judged on their results.
They only want to be judged on their good intentions.
Well, it's time they owned the results.
It's time we forced the ownership of the results and the breakage and the failure of all of their programs on them.
Nothing's in the chip.
Liberals are liberals.
Snertley.
They've broken it even further here.
There's gonna be more pain.
There are going to be more people that don't get treated.
There are gonna be more people that are refused treatment now because of rationing.
And is it gonna be because of them?
But guess what?
It's not gonna be the responsibility of whatever government bureaucrat or bureaucracy makes the decision that somebody doesn't get treated.
It's gonna be we're spending too much on defense.
Uh the Republicans uh didn't join us in this, we didn't get all the help we needed to fix this.
Obviously, we didn't fill all the holes, we need to come back for more.
It's they never change.
That's why they've got to be defeated.
That's why they've got to be hassled and hounded and run out of office.
With relentless pursuit, starting in November.
Now look at this.
Brian Thomas, an airman in the Air Force Honor Guard, bought some DVDs on the internet using his debit card, $20 payment.
He had about $900 in his account.
Following day, his account balance was zero.
Somebody had stolen his account information and bought computer games and other items.
This is a Washington Post story from last week.
The point of this story is 18 to 24 year olds are most at risk for ID theft because they're unique.
They're going to college, they're away from home for the first time, they're sharing information all over the place.
Facebook, MySpace, my butt, my mouth, whatever the websites are.
They're vomiting every bit of information they have about themselves, and thieves are running around in droves stealing their identities.
And there's a way that you can protect yourself from this.
It's called life lock.
Nobody's gonna totally stop identity theft.
But I see stories like this in the uh Washington Post.
Where are these people?
Everybody knows about life lock by now.
When it comes to protecting your identity, why would you go with anybody but LifeLock?
They're the trusted leader, and they don't sell your data to anybody else, like uh competing companies do.
And their life lock identity alert system is the best one there is.
You call them 800 440-4833.
You'll save 10% off the membership, but it's not much at all.
10 or 12 bucks a month.
You can save 10% simply by mentioning my name.
My name opens doors like you can't believe at LifeLock 2, 800 440-4833.
Don in Plant City, Florida.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Hey Rush, we absolutely love you.
And that includes my uh family from the uh the People's Republic of Massachusetts.
But uh Rush, I gotta tell you, um, I'm I didn't call DC this morning.
I call my broker.
And I told, you know, I think as the producers of this country, I just told them we can drain the swamp.
I don't want to be a shareholder in GE if they're gonna back Obamacare.
I don't want to be a shareholder in Microsoft or Disney or the Teamsters.
I'd rather own shares of FedEx and UPS.
So I'd ask the producers of this country, the people have the money, go out there, call your don't call DC, call your brokers and sell the shares.
And and if Obama's gonna fund this, I want 10%.
I'm gonna be my own little bond vigilante, but I'm not gonna let them steal my money.
Interesting idea.
You're actually going to defund uh all these portfolios.
Why not, Rush?
You know, it's the liberals that said they you know divest yourself of South Africa.
You don't like the politics in South Africa, don't own any companies in South Africa.
Well, I don't like these politics.
I don't like GEs, I don't like Microsoft, I don't like Apples, I don't like Goldman Sachs.
I like FedEx.
I don't like UPS and the Teamsters.
And and you know what?
I'm not gonna buy bonds, state bonds in New York, paying me nothing.
I'm gonna be a bond vigilante.
And and the people don't call DC.
Call your brokers, call fidelity, your 401k money and and do something about it.
You know get his attention.
He took credit yesterday, Rush.
He said the the stock market is stable.
Yeah, with our money.
And I don't mean to to yell.
No, the the the the stock market's stable because it's the only place where there's real economic activity going on.
There's no real economy in the country anymore to invest in right now.
No, it's an excellent idea.
I do remember those days.
Gotta divest from South Africa.
We gotta div any American company doing business in South Africa.
We gotta divest.
And uh that I remember those days well because the Democrats were in a race with each other to see who could get us out of the world the fastest on on that on that basis.
But I saw a story, and I I didn't print it out because I didn't think I would need it today.
I think it's a Bloomberg story.
If not, I'll find it and get it right.
It's all about how it's better.
You get a greater return on your investment if you buy bonds from Warren Buffett than if you buy bonds from Obama.
Exactly.
And we can get his attention, and we can get all of their attention in DC.
Everybody, don't call DC, call your brokers.
Shake them to the core.
That'd be funny if that happened.
GE.
I in fact I was GE's running all these Ronald Reagan commercials over the weekend.
Uh, because Reagan used to be one of their spokesmen.
I thought, wow, why are they doing that now?
I mean, because they are in a tank for Obama on this cap and trade and the uh energy business.
Anyway, thanks much for the call.
I got a brief time out here, folks.
Back in just a second.
Don't go away.
And we go to the phones again, uh, Fargo, North Dakota, which is still there.
The experts were wrong all day yesterday.
Fargo was going to be wiped out and a lot of other places because of the Red River, but it didn't rise as much as the experts had predicted.
This is uh Laura.
Great to have you.
Laura, welcome.
Oh, Rush, what a privilege.
Thank you so much for having me.
You bet.
Um, my question is is that well, actually it's a comment.
Uh, at the beginning of the program, you mentioned that Barack Obama, his objective was to divide and conquer.
And I've got to tell you, I've never seen such divisiveness like I've seen this weekend.
He has not only divided and conquered us politically, he has done it by chipping away at our constitution, and now he even divided and conquered the church, the church's stand on Obamacare.
And for those of us who have voted our conscience, we did not vote for Obama, we have participated in Tea Party movements, we have called our congressmen, we have called our senators.
Uh no one listened to us.
Our representatives don't listen to us, and now our church consciences seems to be so divided.
Where are we gonna go next?
It is sickening, isn't it?
It's very sickening.
And who do we have?
Who do we have as our advocates for our consciences?
What where do we go?
Are there gonna be any advocates left for us?
Oh, I mean, uh I need a sanity check here.
I I mean, I'm I'm just so blown away.
I can't believe what has happened.
Our very core of existence.
I tell you what, I want you to listen to something.
Um Paul Ryan, who is quickly becoming a voice to be heard and listened to the Republican Party speech last night on the floor, uh, expresses it well.
If you're if you're looking for somebody that has your conscience, it's Paul Ryan, he's from Wisconsin.
Here's what he said.
This is history.
Today marks a major turning point.
Our founders got it right when they wrote in the Declaration of Independence that our rights come from nature and nature's God, not from government.
Should we now subscribe to an ideology where government creates rights, is solely responsible for delivering these artificial rights, and then rations these rights?
Do we believe that the goal of government is to promote equal opportunity for all Americans to make the most of their lives?
Or do we now believe that government's role is to equalize the results of people's lives?
The philosophy advanced on this floor by this majority today is so paternalistic and so arrogant.
It's condescending.
And it tramples upon the principles that have made America so exceptional.
My friends, we are fast approaching a tipping point where more Americans depend upon the federal government than upon themselves for their livelihoods.
A point where we, the American people, trade in our commitment and our concern for our individual liberties in exchange for government benefits and dependencies.
I think Paul Ryan is going to be one of the many leaders, people trying to stop this.
But I wanted you to hear that, Lori, in case you didn't, because a lot of people feel like they're alone today.
Powerless, unable to reverse this.
It's reality.
I feel alone, Rush.
I really do, and my sanity feels like it's just been sucked out of my head somewhere in two months.
Well, no, no, no, no, no, no.
No, wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
That's because your expectations are in the wrong place.
Oh?
Yes, you can only be disappointed if your expectations are wrong.
You should know who these people are.
This has been coming.
They've been telegraphing this.
This should not have been a surprise to you what happened.
I can't believe that they used the same people who were actually against this and were almost our heroes, and used our same argument to advance to uh bring their uh Obamacare across the finish line.
And uh you're talking about the the pro-life Democrats?
Right.
I mean Well, this is I I'm not trying to be harsh with you here, Laura.
I'm uh reality is what it is.
There's no such thing as a pro-life Democrat.
No, they're not.
And you're really distressed because it may not be that there's a pro-life church anymore.
The left is taking over every institution.
They have to be stopped.
And the fur the it it's it's it's about time, you know.
Maybe, you know, I'm not trying to be polyannish.
Look at the bright side of this, because I don't frankly see many.
But one of them is don't doubt me anymore.
It's out in front of your eye.
Believe what you see.
Believe what you hear.
It is real.
The Catholic Church has a bunch of leftists in it who would just as soon destroy the church and remake it as the government has liberals in it who want to remake our government, destroy the Constitution.
Liberals are liberals.
They do not value institutions until they run them and remake them in their own way.
And nothing is sacred.
Not the Catholic Church, not the Methodist Church, nothing.
Zilch, zero nada.
I shouldn't have to say this, especially after this weekend.
The real challenge, and it's hard.
I know it's hard.
You can't believe that we've elected people to run this country who don't like it.
Well, we did, but not on purpose.
They were fooled, lied to, defrauded, everything else.
So it's out there right in the open for everyone to see and take note of.
They don't deserve to win another election ever.
The country cannot withstand them winning another major election.
Gotta go.
Be right back.
But don't doubt me.
Get this uh get this lead from an AP news analysis today, folks.
The initial blush of Obama's health care triumph immediately gives way to a sober political reavy.
He must sell the landmark legislation to an angry and unpredictable electorate still reeling from the recession.
And voters may not buy it.
Are these people that dense?
This is Liz Sidotti.
May not buy it?
We don't buy it.
We're not gonna buy it.
We're not gonna comply.
Put us all in jail.
See you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection