All Episodes
Previous Next
March 22, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:38
March 22, 2010, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Howdy folks, great to have you here.
Welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, and this is the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, Limbaugh Institute, for advanced conservative studies.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, the email address, lrushbaugh at eivnet.com.
All right, the piece here in the American Spectator is a long and well, it's not long, but I mean, it's a piece written about the prospects of the state lawsuits over mandates of coverage and so forth, mandates to buy insurance, succeeding at the Supreme Court.
And this is a tough slog because to get to the Supreme Court, you have to first get through a circuit court, probably a D.C. circuit, I think.
And the D.C. Circuit has got a bunch of big government judges on it.
This is going to be a tough slog to get to the Supreme Court.
But here's the thing.
Of course, there are mandates.
And one of the things that Republicans are going to do in the Senate, by the way, in this, when they take up the reconciliation package, they are going to offer an amendment to allow fast tracking to the court for immediate judicial review of the legislation.
Now, Orrin Hatch just on Fox says, I don't know anybody who'd vote against that.
Well, I do.
I do.
Try the Democrats who know they've written something unconstitutional who do not want judicial review.
That's who will vote against it.
Anyway, the piece is by Michael Filizoff.
Conservatives and Tea Partiers despondent over the fact that liberal Democrats have just passed a massive encroachment on our liberties over their massive protests should take hope.
By the way, I don't know why this popped into my head.
Howard Feynman, why aren't you angry?
You're asking me why I'm angry?
I'm not really angry.
We're determined here.
The American people didn't vote yesterday.
The Democrat Party did.
And they didn't vote the way the American people have expressed themselves on this.
And this is not insignificant.
But we are determined here.
But you ought to join us in being.
Howard's not going to be mad because he's in a protected class.
He's a state-controlled media, looked upon favorably by the very people whose agenda he helps to advance.
So why would he be mad?
James Madison saw things like this coming, and his forethought will give opponents of Obamacare one last shot at killing it.
In Federalist No. 10, Madison wrote, enlightened statesmen will not always be at the helm.
And he got that right.
Knowing that the nation's future leaders would include usurpers and potential tyrants, Madison sought a way to preserve individual liberty despite them.
He thus devised the system of the separation of powers.
He wrote, essential to the preservation of liberty, this in Federalist 51, it is evident that each department should have a will of its own and members of each department should be as little dependent as possible on the other branches.
Passage of legislation by Congress and the signature of the president are not enough.
The next step is judicial review by the Supreme Court, an independent and co-equal branch of government.
Already, the states of Idaho and Virginia have vowed to sue the federal government over Obamacare, and the passage of the legislation will doubtless spawn hundreds of other lawsuits as well, primarily over the mandates.
It simply is not constitutional.
And we need this resolved for the federal government to demand citizens buy anything.
And this bill does that.
It mandates that you buy health insurance or pay a fine.
Madison was a brilliant enough thinker to understand that the separation of powers relied on more than each branch having the necessary constitutional means to resist the others.
The separation of powers provided each branch with the personal motives to resist the encroachment of others.
Ambition, he wrote, must be made to counteract ambition.
The interests of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the branch.
Thankfully, the court now has an axe to grind with Obama.
Remember the State of the Union address in January?
Obama took a cheap shot at the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United upholding free speech and overturning key provisions of the McCain-Feingold Law.
Congressional Democrats whooped and jeered at the court like obnoxious schoolboys.
Obama reamed them out on national TV to their faces when they can't respond.
The court was humiliated.
Justice Alito shook his head in disgust and muttered that the president's remarks were not true.
In March, Chief Justice John Roberts told an audience at the University of Alabama that the behavior of the president and the congressional Democrats was very troubling and questioned why the Supreme Court should even bother to attend a political pep rally like that.
Roberts' remarks caused the White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs to issue a snarky rebuttal again condemning the court's decision.
It may be that the individual mandate on Obamacare requiring all Americans to purchase health insurance against their will is unconstitutional.
But after the State of the Union dust up, the court has more than just technical legal motives to take up the case.
Madison lamented that reliance on personal motives and ambitions should be necessary to control the abuses of government, but understood that this was a reflection of human nature.
So the author here says, I'm hoping Madison's understanding of human nature was correct and that Justices Alito and Roberts are chomping at the bit for the chance to get back at Obama and his congressional goons for the humiliation they inflicted on the court.
A decision striking down Obamacare authored by Justice Alito would be the ultimate smackdown.
So there's wishful thinking.
It's probably, it's a tough slog.
Everything we've got to do from this point forward is a tough slog.
Repeal is a tough slog.
Winning elections and taking control of the house.
Winning elections may not be that tough, but winning control of the house, that's going to be a tough slog.
I mean, these people, my friend, they have acorn.
I mean, these are the people that engage in all kinds of election fraud, the Chicago Way.
So it's going to be a tough slog to get there.
But there are 37 or 38 states that have, 37 in the process of filing lawsuits.
Florida's on the verge of their legislature of agreeing to do it, but two of them so far have.
And there probably will be others along the way as well.
And this is why the Democrats are not out there doing a victory lap.
In fact, the Democrats, the White House has announced they're going to be trying now to explain what this is to the American people.
Remember, Pelosi said we have to pass this so people find out what's in it.
There's also something that's not being said very much, but I want to say it.
Truth be known, the Democrats in the House do not at all like what they passed on Sunday, the Senate bill.
They do not like it.
That's why it was never voted on.
It was never passed.
Because there was never going to be support for it.
But don't start feeling all good about that.
The reason they didn't like it is because it didn't go further left than it did.
Didn't have a public option in it.
That these people are idiots.
It's going to be a public option by default and by design, which is what Obama told that idiot Kucinich.
Who knows what else he got?
Now they face a battle over in the Senate with reconciliation.
The Republicans claim that there is an impact on social security in this reconciliation bill, which disqualifies it from reconciliation, meaning that the Democrats are going to have to have 60 votes to pass this reconciliation bill.
But if you can't go reconciliation, then it's not a reconciliation bill.
Then if it gets changed, it's got to go back to the House.
For more arguments, it's that bill that has the 16,000 new cops at the IRS.
It's that bill that has all the investment income being raised on the Medicare tax being raised and applied to stock profits, investment portfolio profits.
It's in the Senate bill at something like 2.2%.
This House reconciliation bill raises it to 3.9%.
Essentially, the House Reconciliation Bill raises capital gains and Medicare taxes on capital gains to an effective 25% because capital gains goes 15 to 20 and all these other things get it close to 25%.
If the, well, Obama's budget gets the capital gains up to 20%.
These two health care bills pull it all the way up to close to 25.
But they won't get all the way there unless they pass this reconciliation bill.
And if they run into trouble over there, it all depends on the parliamentarian.
If the parliamentarian says, yeah, you guys, you really don't qualify here for reconciliation.
Still not out of the woods because the vice president can overrule the parliamentarian.
And though it would be nuclear to do it, it would not be the first nuclear blast to hit us.
What happened last night was.
So they're already, and look at what they did.
Look at, if you listen to Obama's sales pitch on Saturday afternoon at the House Auditorium in the just completed Visitors Center where Harry Reid says you can smell the tourists in the summertime.
Obama is sitting there and saying, look, and so was Pelosi.
Look, you're going to lose in November anyway.
You may as well go down with a ship voting for this.
You're going to lose anyway.
And I kept thinking, Bill Clinton was out there telling these people months ago that the only reason they had to hope for victory was passing it.
And yet here was their leadership admitting that they're going to lose their seats, a lot of them.
So they may as well vote for it in the first place.
Before we go to the break, Ronald Reagan, 1964, articulated the same crossroads at which we find ourselves today.
Reagan gave this speech during the presidential campaign.
This was during the middle, we're right snack dab in the middle of the creation of Medicare.
That would be signed a year later or in 1965.
So we faced similar circumstances.
This idea that government is beholden to the people, that it has no other source of power except the sovereign people, is still the newest and the most unique idea in all the long history of man's relation to man.
This is the issue of this election.
Whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far distant capital can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.
You and I are told increasingly we have to choose between a left or right.
Well, I'd like to suggest there is no such thing as a left or right.
There's only an up or down.
Man's own age dream.
The ultimate in individual freedom consistent with law and order or down to the ant heap of totalitarianism.
That's where we find ourselves.
And then he said some of the most famous words of his life.
You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
We'll preserve for our children this the last best hope of man on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.
Chew on that, and we'll be right back.
Don't go away.
Welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Wonder what's going to happen.
Arizona cancels its S-CHIP program, the children's health insurance program.
Just cancels it.
We don't have any money.
What's going to happen?
April 16th out in the state of Washington when Walgreens refuses to accept any new Medicaid patients.
The reason is they can't, the government reimbursement on the prescriptions that they fill are a losing proposition.
Walgreens is losing money on Medicaid prescriptions because the reimbursement has been cut.
What's going to happen when that actually starts?
When new Medicaid patients go into Walgreens in the state of Washington and the pharmacists, I'm sorry, but we are not taking any new Medicaid patients.
What's going to happen?
I predict to you the plan's already in the works.
Acorn and others will pretend to be these people.
They will take busloads and busloads of people to Walgreens stores.
They will protest and whine and moan and they will accuse Walgreens of not caring about the sick and the poor.
And they will dump on them left and right.
This will attract the TV cameras.
And then the demonstrators will go to DC after they have harassed and hassled the people at Walgreens in the state of Washington.
Then they'll go to D.C. and they'll march and they will demand relief on this.
And Congress will then put in a mandate that all stores, all doctors, and all hospitals must accept Medicaid patients regardless of their reimbursements.
What do you mean they can't do it?
They've just mandated that we all have to go out and buy insurance.
They've just making the doctors lose money, Mr. Sterdley.
The reimbursement for doctors and a doc fix and so forth.
They're having to work on that.
Go talk to doctors who are leaving Medicare and Medicaid because the reimbursements are such it doesn't even cover the expenses of an office visit half the time.
So we mean they can't do it.
What in this, in the House reconciliation bill, it clearly takes money from Social Security and shifts it into some other medical program in order to play an accounting trick and supposedly save money.
Now the Byrd rule says that you cannot reconcile.
You cannot use reconciliation on anything involving Social Security.
It's an entitlement.
The House reconciliation bill clearly, I can read you the section if you want, takes money from Social Security and shifts it into this other health care plan so they can say that it doesn't cost as much as it does.
Now there's only one way for the parliamentarian to rule.
Sorry, your bill does not qualify for reconciliation.
See here it says in the Byrd rule, but what's the parliamentarian likely to do?
House Republicans don't know because folks we have Democrats and we have rules.
And when those two things are present, the effect is there aren't any rules.
Witness, the Constitution's rules have just been ignored in the health care bill.
What if the parliamentarian says, yeah, you know, it does say that they're taking money from Social Security, putting it into another account, and Bird Rule does say, you know what, I'm going to go ahead and rule that this is constitutional.
I'm going to go ahead and say that this fits Senate rules.
And Republicans, what are you talking about?
It's clearly a violation.
Oh, nope.
I'm going to say it.
It's good.
He's supposedly nonpartisan.
Who knows if the parliamentarian, I don't know the guy, but the way things are going, everything's being stood on its head upside down these days.
Even if the parliamentarian has the guts to enforce the rule on this, along comes Biden, who can overrule a parliamentarian as the president of the Senate.
Oh, yes, he can.
Oh, yes, he can, and he'll do so.
Jack, Hot Springs, Arkansas, great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
I finally got through.
Rush, I'm a retailer since 1965, and I'm in my fourth store right now, and I have lost five good quality American companies.
And three of the companies have written me letters saying they're closing their doors because they cannot compete with imports from China.
My question is: why in the world can't we get somebody in our government with all of these Obama lackeys that'll figure out how to bring jobs and manufacturing back to America by perhaps increasing the duty on imports and tariffs?
It's terrible.
We're supporting the Chinese, and we're losing millions of dollars and millions of jobs in this country.
Have you heard of something called the national debt?
Yes.
Do you know who owns most of it?
Well, sure.
Well, there's your answer: they run us, and they want a growing economy.
That's why they're not going to go into any pollution emission controls.
That's why they're not going to the ChiComs.
We say, we're going to slap tariffs on you.
And they say, okay, well, go ahead.
We'll just stop doing business with you altogether.
And by the way, we'll call in your loan or call in some of the debt.
Well, Rush, I'll tell you what, and you'll appreciate this, a quick comment.
And you never heard this.
It was never reported by the media because the media weren't there.
I was in grad school, 1961 in Arizona.
Barry Goldwater came to speak to us about 450 of us.
Large old auditorium, no air conditioning.
The windows were open, doors were open.
When he was speaking, the only light was the light on his lectern where his notes were.
A moth, a large moth, came in there, attracted by the light, and it was distracting.
And he brushed it away a couple of times.
Finally, that moth landed right on Goldwater's notes.
And he picked it up by the wings and threw it on the floor and stepped on it.
He says, Those damn Democrats have spies everywhere.
He brought the house down.
I was wondering where you were going with this.
I was in there with grads from all over the country, all political backgrounds, and he had everybody right in the palm of his hand.
He'd be in jail today doing that.
Anyway, Rush, I appreciate the.
Look, I'm not trying to avoid your question.
This is the.
Look, you're in business.
You know that markets always seek the lowest labor cost they can.
We don't have any leverage with the Chinese.
Zilch, Zero Nada.
They're in bed with the Iranians, too.
Back we are, Rush Limbaugh and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
No, I wasn't trying to treat the previous caller with a lackadaisical attitude.
You could cut corporate tax rates to help domestic corporations.
You could do any number of things.
What I should have said, in addition to the fact we have very little leverage with the ChiComs, the dirty little secret is President Obama doesn't care.
Look, I want to keep my tone measured here because I do want this to be heard as rationally as I'm saying it.
The objective is to inflict harm on the private sector of this country.
It is the purpose.
Companies closing down, canceling their manufacturing base because they can't compete with ChiCom labor.
No big deal to Obama.
Doesn't bother him.
As far as Obama is concerned, this country's got a lesson to learn.
This country has got to learn that it can't run around the world and bully and steal from everybody else.
We got to get cut down to size.
We got to learn what living in pain is really like.
The same kind of pain Obama believes this country has caused other people, including other Americans.
No, this is get even with the country time.
The more pain, the better as far as he's concerned, because that's more chaos.
Anybody, is there anybody out there who thinks the stimulus plan worked?
Is there anybody who thinks it is working?
Okay, no, of course not.
Well, that's what this health care bill needs to be compared to.
Anybody think this is going to work?
Did the TARP thing work?
No, it didn't work.
Plain as they now, Snerdley, Snerdley just said, okay, all-knowing, I got a question for you.
Since the Democrats have passed this, doesn't that mean the end of that page in their playbook where for everything going wrong in the country, they can bring up all these sob stories filled with people who say, oh, my God, I love my healthcare and I lost my job and I lost my car.
Oh, it doesn't mean the end of that at all.
They gave us Medicare to fix a problem.
And guess whose fault it is now?
It's the doctors.
It's the insurance companies.
They gave us Social Security, and guess whose fault that is?
This is what I said earlier in the program.
The day is over.
This is why we need genuine conservatives running for all.
The day is over where they get all the benefits of these entitlements in terms of attitude, but they don't pay any price for it.
They deserve to own all of the breakage.
They have broken all of these things.
They own it.
And we need to have people start saying so, other than on the radio.
So this isn't going to work.
There are going to be sob stories left and right.
There are going to be people who don't get health care.
Their premiums are going to go too high.
They're going to be people denied coverage.
And even though it's the Obama government that's going to be responsible for all that, they're going to still bring these people up because we'll need to fix the legislation even more.
Oops, you know what?
We need to take care of this so this doesn't happen to any more American families.
They'll use the sob stories to expand and build on this.
They're not through here.
But as long as they've got the media on their side, they always get the benefit of creating these things.
It's the line I always use.
They don't want to be judged on their results.
They only want to be judged on their good intentions.
Well, it's time they owned the results.
It's time we forced the ownership of the results and the breakage and the failure of all of their programs on them.
Nothing's in the chip.
Liberals are liberals.
Snirdly, they've broken it even further here.
There are going to be more pain.
There are going to be more people that don't get treated.
There are going to be more people that are refused treatment now because of rationing.
And is it going to be because of them?
But guess what?
It's not going to be the responsibility of whatever government bureaucrat or bureaucracy makes the decision that somebody doesn't get treated.
It's going to be we're spending too much on defense.
The Republicans didn't join us in this.
We didn't get all the help we needed to fix this.
Obviously, we didn't fill all the holes.
We need to come back for more.
They never change.
That's why they've got to be defeated.
That's why they've got to be hassled and hounded and run out of office with relentless pursuit starting in November.
Now look at this.
Brian Thomas, an airman in the Air Force Honor Guard, bought some DVDs on the internet using his debit card, $20 payment.
He had about $900 in his account.
Following day, his account balance was zero.
Somebody had stolen his account information and bought computer games and other items.
This is a Washington Post story from last week.
The point of this story is 18 to 24-year-olds are most at risk for ID theft because they're unique.
They're going to college.
They're away from home for the first time.
They're sharing information all over the place.
Facebook, MySpace, MyButt, MyMouth, whatever the websites are.
They're vomiting every bit of information they have about themselves, and thieves are running around in droves stealing their identities.
And there's a way that you can protect yourself from this.
It's called Life Lock.
Nobody's going to totally stop identity theft.
But I see stories like this in the Washington Post.
Where are these people?
Everybody knows about Life Lock by now.
When it comes to protecting your identity, why would you go with anybody but Life Lock?
They're the trusted leader, and they don't sell your data to anybody else like competing companies do.
And their Life Lock identity alert system is the best one there is.
You call them, 800-440-4833.
You'll save 10% off the membership, but it's not much at all.
You're only 10 or 12 bucks a month.
You can save 10% simply by mentioning my name.
My name opens doors like you can't believe at Life Lock 2, 800-440-4833.
Don in Plant City, Florida.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
We absolutely love you.
And that includes my family from the People's Republic of Massachusetts.
But Rush, I got to tell you, I didn't call DC this morning.
I called my broker.
And I told, you know, I think as the producers of this country, I just told them we can drain the swamp.
I don't want to be a shareholder in GE if they're going to back Obamacare.
I don't want to be a shareholder in Microsoft or Disney or the Teamsters.
I'd rather own shares of FedEx and UPS.
So I'd ask the producers of this country, the people who have the money, go out there, don't call DC, call your brokers and sell the shares.
And if Obama's going to fund this, I want 10%.
I'm going to be my own little bond vigilante, but I'm not going to let him steal my money.
Interesting idea.
You're actually going to defund all these portfolios.
Why not, Rush?
You know, it was the liberals that said they, you know, divest yourself of South Africa.
You don't like the politics in South Africa.
Don't own any companies in South Africa.
Well, I don't like these politics.
I don't like GEs.
I don't like Microsoft's.
I don't like Apple.
I don't like Goldman Sachs.
I like FedEx.
I don't like UPS and the Teamsters.
And you know what?
I'm not going to buy bonds, state bonds in New York, paying me nothing.
I'm going to be a bond vigilante.
And the people, don't call D.C. Call your brokers.
Call Fidelity, your 401k money, and do something about it.
Get his attention.
He took credit yesterday, Rush.
He said the stock market is stable.
Yeah, with our money.
And I don't mean to yell.
No, the stock market's stable because it's the only place where there's real economic activity going on.
There's no real economy in the country anymore to invest in right now.
No, it's an excellent idea.
I do remember those days.
Got to divest from South Africa.
We've got to divest any American company doing business in South Africa.
We've got to divest.
And I remember those days well because the Democrats were in a race with each other to see who could get us out of the world the fastest on that basis.
I saw a story, and I didn't print it out because I didn't think I would need it today.
I think it's a Bloomberg story.
If not, I'll find it.
Get it right.
It's all about how it's better, you get a greater return on your investment if you buy bonds from Warren Buffett than if you buy bonds from Obama.
Exactly.
And we can get his attention, and we can get all of their attention in D.C. Everybody, don't call D.C. Call your brokers.
Shake them to the core.
That'd be funny if that happened.
GE.
In fact, GE's running all these Ronald Reagan commercials over the weekend because Reagan used to be one of their spokesmen.
I thought, wow, why are they doing that now?
I mean, because they are in a tank for Obama on this cap and trade and the energy business.
Anyway, thanks much for the call.
I got a brief time out here, folks.
Back in just a second.
Don't go away.
Here we go to the phones again.
Fargo, North Dakota, which is still there.
The experts were wrong all day yesterday.
Fargo was going to be wiped out and a lot of other places because of the Red River, but it didn't rise as much as the experts had predicted.
This is Laura.
Great to have you.
Laura, welcome.
Oh, Rush, what a privilege.
Thank you so much for having me.
You bet.
My question is, is that, well, actually, it's a comment.
At the beginning of the program, you mentioned that Barack Obama, his objective was to divide and conquer.
And I've got to tell you, I've never seen such divisiveness like I've seen this weekend.
He has not only divided and conquered us politically, he has done it by chipping away at our Constitution.
And now he even divided and conquered the church, the church's stand on Obamacare.
And for those of us who have voted our conscience, we did not vote for Obama.
We have participated in Tea Party movements.
We have called our congressmen.
We have called our senators.
No one listened to us.
Our representatives don't listen to us.
And now our church conscience seems to be so divided.
Where are we going to go next?
It is sickening, isn't it?
It's very sickening.
And who do we have?
Who do we have as our advocates for our consciences?
Where do we go?
Are there going to be any advocates left for us?
Oh, I mean, I need a sanity check here.
I mean, I'm just so blown away.
I can't believe what has happened.
Our very core of existence.
I'll tell you what, I want you to listen to something.
Paul Ryan, who is quickly becoming a voice to be heard and listened to at the Republican Party speech last night on the floor, expresses it well.
If you're looking for somebody that has your conscience, it's Paul Ryan.
He's from Wisconsin.
Here's what he said.
This is history.
Today marks a major turning point.
Our founders got it right when they wrote in the Declaration of Independence that our rights come from nature and nature's God, not from government.
Should we now subscribe to an ideology where government creates rights, is solely responsible for delivering these artificial rights, and then rations these rights?
Do we believe that the goal of government is to promote equal opportunity for all Americans to make the most of their lives?
Or do we now believe that government's role is to equalize the results of people's lives?
The philosophy advanced on this floor by this majority today is so paternalistic and so arrogant.
It's condescending.
And it tramples upon the principles that have made America so exceptional.
My friends, we are fast approaching a tipping point where more Americans depend upon the federal government than upon themselves for their livelihoods.
A point where we, the American people, trade in our commitment and our concern for our individual liberties in exchange for government benefits and dependencies.
I think Paul Ryan is going to be one of the many leaders, people trying to stop this.
You know, but point out, I wanted you to hear that, Laura, in case you didn't, because a lot of people feel like they're alone today, powerless, unable to reverse this.
It's reality.
I feel alone, Rush.
I really do, and my sanity feels like it's just been sucked out of my head somewhere.
Well, no, wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
That's because your expectations are in the wrong place.
Oh?
Yes, you can only be disappointed if your expectations are wrong.
You should know who these people are.
This has been coming.
They've been telegraphing this.
This should not have been a surprise to you.
What happened?
I can't believe that they used the same people who were actually against this and were almost our heroes and used our same argument to bring their Obamacare across the finish line.
And you're talking about the pro-life Democrats?
Right.
I mean, I'm not trying to be harsh with you here, Laura.
Reality is what it is.
There's no such thing as a pro-life Democrat.
No, they're not.
And you're really distressed because it may not be that there's a pro-life church anymore.
The left is taking over every institution.
They have to be stopped.
And it's about time.
Maybe, you know, I'm not trying to be polyanish, look at the bright side of this because I don't frankly see many.
But one of them is, don't doubt me anymore.
It's out in front of your eyes.
Believe what you see.
Believe what you hear.
It is real.
The Catholic Church has a bunch of leftists in it who would just as soon destroy the church and remake it as the government has liberals in it who want to remake our government, destroy the Constitution.
Liberals are liberals.
They do not value institutions until they run them and remake them in their own way.
And nothing is sacred.
Not the Catholic Church, not the Methodist Church.
Nothing.
Zilch, Zero Nada.
I shouldn't have to say this, especially after this weekend.
The real challenge, and it's hard, I know it's hard, you can't believe that we've elected people to run this country who don't like it.
Well, we did, but not on purpose.
They were fooled, lied to, defrauded, everything else.
So it's out there right in the open for everyone to see and take note of.
They don't deserve to win another election ever.
The country cannot withstand them winning another major election.
Gotta go.
Be right back.
But don't doubt me.
Get this lead from an AP news analysis today, folks.
The initial blush of Obama's healthcare triumph immediately gives way to a sober political reality.
He must sell the landmark legislation to an angry and unpredictable electorate still reeling from the recession.
And voters may not buy it.
Are these people that dense?
This is Liz Sedoti.
May not buy it?
We don't buy it.
We're not going to buy it.
We're not going to comply.
Put us all in jail.
See you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection