All Episodes
Previous Next
March 4, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:39
March 4, 2010, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Media and the Democrats are squealing like a bunch of stuck pigs.
So that must mean the RNC has finally done something right.
There's a new fundraising campaign using fear, warning people that we're trending towards socialism, and all Democrats are banned.
What's wrong with that?
Somebody tell me where that doesn't work.
Greetings.
Great to have you with us.
Rush Limbaugh and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, a fastest three hours in media.
Our telephone number 800 282-2882, the email address, L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
We may all need one of these before we're through here.
This is from what?
The UK telegraph, extra small condoms for 12-year-old boys have gone on sale in Switzerland, extra small.
Uh going on sale.
Twelve-year-olds are not using enough protection uh protections.
So they're calling this thing the hot shot.
This new um, I'm not making it up, folks.
Uh the uh extra small condom called the hot shot.
Okay, let's get right to this health care business because um, you know, yesterday spent a lot of time in the final hour explaining reconciliation.
And I have to tell you, uh something just zipped it I it went by so fast I missed it.
And I want uh that this is really, really, really crucial here.
Um, I have been telling everybody, I didn't miss this.
I've been telling everybody the action is in the house on this now.
It's not the Senate, but all this talk about reconciliation in the Senate only becomes valid if the House passes the Senate bill, and that's not an automatic.
Bart Stuck, Bart Stupak's out, in fact, he says he's got 12 votes against it because let's grab audio subway number six.
He got he got he's got uh twelve votes against it uh because of uh number five, I'm sorry, five and six, because of abortion.
Here's what Stupec said.
It's accurate to say there are at least twelve of us who voted for health care who have indicated to the leadership and others that unless you fix this abortion language, we can't vote for a final version of the bill.
So the uh the question well, if if reconciliation requires people to vote up or down on the Senate version that the president has endorsed, that means it won't get your vote.
Does that mean that it won't pass?
If it's the proposal that the Senate pass and nothing's changed in it, the Senate health care bill.
If that's the one they're presenting in reconciliation to the members of the House of Representatives, I'll bet you that won't even come close to passing.
It'll be defeated soundly.
Members do not want to vote for it.
The process has been tainted, and we're not gonna attach our nation.
That's Bart Stupak.
Now, I have have a way for Obama to handle StuPEG.
Obama's narcissism is out of control on this.
He doesn't care about anything other than getting this.
And Gibbs is out there saying whatever it takes.
He doesn't care about the politics, he doesn't care about anything.
He's just gonna get this.
So they got an obstacle in the road out there.
Is Bart Stupak?
So here's what Obama ought to do.
Call Stupak on the phone and say, Bart, the AMA has scored my health care bill, and it will bend the abortion curve down.
Uh there will be fewer abortions in my bill.
The second thing he should do to tell Stupec is to offer to carve out an abortion exemption for Michigan, just like they carved out a Medicare exemption for uh for Ben Nelson.
So whatever abortion language is in the bill, it won't apply to Michigan.
Uh the third thing, suggest a 0.1% tax on all abortions, and claim bipartisan agreement because Republicans say if you tax something, get less of it, so tax abortions at a very, very, very minimal rate, uh, and then offer to rename the bill, the Stupak Anti-Abortion Right to Life Health Bill.
I mean, this is the kind of stuff Obama's doing, folks, to try to get this passed.
Number five, offer Stupak's family, ambassadorships, and a dozen Greek islands.
And uh and then let the let the state control media pound away.
Actually, isn't funny.
Here's the thing.
Steny Hoyer said yesterday That the first thing's gonna happen is the House would pass the Senate bill.
And then that bill becomes the official House bill, and then reconciliation starts.
However, however, this is what I missed.
If the House goes first, and that's what everybody's talking about now, that means the House would pass the Senate bill that passed on Christmas Eve.
That's the bill that everybody's talking about.
Obama did not have a bill.
All he's done is endorse the Senate bill.
All this bipartisan addition, there's nothing in it.
It's the Senate bill, and if the House passes that, guess what?
Guess what?
No, no, no, guess what?
The Senate's already passed it.
They send it over to the House under the pretext of it going back to reconciliation.
No, no, no, no, no.
If the House passes this, it goes to Obama.
It goes to Obama.
If the House passes the Senate bill, then he's got both houses who have signed off on it, and he's got a Senate bill, a house, a health bill he can sign.
And reconciliation is not going to happen.
It is a feint.
It is a distraction.
It's not going to happen.
Well, it might have to happen because they don't have the votes in the house.
See, this is the key.
If they had the votes in the House for this bill, we would already have health care.
She does not have the votes.
You just heard Stuck say that there are 12 people that voted for it are going to vote against it.
There hasn't been any change in the Senate bill, and there can't be a change in it.
So all this talk of reconciliation is actually a bit of a, shall we say, lie to members of the House to say, okay, you pass our bill in the Senate here, we'll get reconciliation, we'll put back in it what you want.
They don't have to do that.
We would have Obamacare if the House passes the Senate bill.
Everybody's looking at the Senate, everybody's looking at Reed and Reconciliation.
The battle is in the House, and it has always been in the House.
Because she does not have the votes right now.
I don't care.
You know, this guy Massa, we told you yesterday that he's been accused of fondling or sexually harassing a male staffer.
Guess what?
Stanny Hoyer knew it, knew it all along.
This guy voted against the bill the last time, not because he disagrees with it, but because he thought it was too expensive.
So guess what?
He's now going to retire.
Uh they've put this little bit of new who how do you, if they knew about it, how do you think it leaked?
Uh also Obama is going to appoint to the federal bench a relative of a member of Congress who voted against the health care bill.
I mean, he's literally out there that's why I said this, you know, give Stupak some Greece Islands, Greek islands, and and so this is they're pulling out, pulling out all the stops here.
So forget the Senate, folks.
Uh you it it it is the the necessity here is to continue to focus on your member of the House of Representatives, and all of them.
Sturdly, you're looking jumping out of your skin, what a question.
What's the question?
Mm-hmm.
It the changes that Obama says he wants are not gonna get in the bills right now.
All that's a smoke screen.
All of that was bringing up these doctors.
Let me tell you something.
Let me tell you, if if any doctor, any doctor that votes for Obama might be in line for a lobotomy.
We're still allowed to use that word when doing satire, I forget.
I know we can't, the R word here is a lobotomy.
Still okay, all right.
Um, has there ever been a more respected profession, this maligned, this used, and this minimized?
Obama uses doctors like Tiger Woods uses pancake house waitresses.
And poll dancers.
If I'm a doctor and I turn on that propalooza thing yesterday, the propaganda loser, all these people white, how do we even know those were doctors?
Just put some, you know, just put some white coats on these people.
How do we know they're doctors And not from the DNC?
How do we know they're not from moveon.org?
How do we know they're doctors?
If if if I'm a doctor and I watched that thing yesterday, and if I have any self-respect whatsoever, I'm wearing a just say hell no to Obama button today, and every day while I treat my patients.
I'm attending every tea party event that's held when I can.
Obama is going to turn doctors into laborers for the state, and they'll probably have to unionize just like every other public sector employee.
And I, you know, I I I speculated in today's morning update that there in fact would be a doctor's union coming down the pike.
You know, scientists and doctors have a lot to think about today.
Do they give a damn about their professions?
Do they give a damn about their reputations?
Or are they content to just be props?
For liberals?
Are they the liars and cheats and butchers that Obama has said they are?
Do they make their own decisions on what to charge, who to treat, and how to treat them, or do they take orders from a guy who doesn't know a belch from expelling gas through the anal cavity?
What Obama did to doctors yesterday was absolutely humiliating and consistent with how he's mistreated him ever since he went on this rampage to get this monument to himself.
What he did yesterday with these doctors was just perform his own version of political surgery, cut them off at the knees, remove their vocal cards at no charge.
Didn't any of them say anything?
No, just standing up here looking like a bunch of props, like a bunch of dupes.
Oh yeah, we support every lie this guy is telling.
And nodding their heads and their standing ovations and so forth.
How do we even know they were doctors?
And how do we even know they were no, I asked that because the last time they brought a bunch of doctors up there, these clowns forgot to bring their their lab coats, and so somehow the White House had boxes of them to pass out in the Rose Garden.
Well, if you got a box of lab coats a year ago, you still have them today.
I doubt that you've given them to goodwill.
Probably right there in the props closet.
I I'm serious.
So what we're talking about here, folks, is not reconciliation.
We're talking about if the House passes the Senate bill, we've got Obamacare.
So, and they don't have the votes in the House, we know that, or they'd be passing it already.
It would have happened.
They don't have the votes.
I don't care what anybody tells you.
David Rodham Gergen doesn't think they've got the votes.
David Rodam Gurgen thinks this is a mess.
It's getting set up here, couple rush C I told you so is coming.
And yesterday, I told you that the first place you should look to find out what really went on yesterday and what's really going on is the Heritage Foundation.
Well, I did that myself, went to their morning bell, which is the blog that kicks the whole thing off, and I'll share really cool excerpts from their analysis.
We'll get to the audio sound bites of all this when we get back, which will happen sooner than you could believe possible.
Here you go, Brian, this is it.
Waldo de los Rios.
Uh looks like it's uh cut free, Mozart Symphony 40 G minor.
Need you to put it through the flamethrower, send it back to me as an MP3.
Actually, don't put it back on a CD.
I don't want it compressed.
Okay, we're back, Rush Limbaugh, 800-282-2882, and you know, I'm watching MSNBC.
They're just going nuts over this RNC fundraising thing.
It's so it's so bad.
Are they playing on fear?
Are they playing on fear?
What pray tell is the entire strategy used by liberals and Democrats my whole life?
Global warming, fear.
You're gonna die if you eat or drink that fear.
We ought to be afraid of these Democrats.
It's natural to be afraid of Obama.
He is a joker.
And politico think they've got an exclusive here, RNC document mocks donors plays on fear.
Mox donors?
A bit of a little contradiction here.
The presentation was delivered by RNC Finance Director uh Rob Brickhart, Bickhart, to top donors and fundraisers in Boca Grande, Florida.
In Neat PowerPoint pages, it lifts the curtain on the often cynical terms of political marketing, displaying an air of disdain for the party's donors that is usually confined to the barroom conversations of political oper.
How disdainful could it be if they invite these top donors and fundraisers to a party to see the ads?
How if they use the very presentation, how in the world can this be said to mock donors?
Anyway, it just it's a Mars Venus thing.
It literally is a Mars Venus.
Now back to the uh Heritage Foundation, morning bill and health care.
The doctors in lab coats surrounding Obama, as he gave his latest health care speech, were not there to give the president a physical.
That happened Sunday.
No, these doctors were props dressed to impress for what the White House claims is their final push for the president's government takeover of health care.
The president again repeated the same old tired claims, which are lies that he has been making for months.
The proposal I put forward gives Americans more control over their health care.
Our proposal is paid for, my proposal bring down the cost of health care for millionaire.
All of that's lies.
All of that's right out of Solalinski.
As the Heritage Foundation says, we and plenty of others have refuted all these claims before, but this time they are particularly easy to expose as patently false.
President Obama gave the game away when he said this.
Our cost cutting measures mirror most of the proposals in the current Senate bill, which reduces most people's premiums and brings down our deficit by up to one trillion dollars over the next two decades, and those aren't my numbers.
They're the savings determined by the CBO, which is the Washington acronym for the nonpartisan independent referee of Congress.
But there is one huge difference between the Senate bill and what the president kept referring to as my our proposal, and that is the Senate bill actually exists.
We don't have an Obama bill.
He made it sound like he's got a proposal yesterday that he's incorporated all these Republican ideas.
It doesn't exist.
None of what he said yesterday exists unless it's already in the Senate bill.
For all the talk in Washington about Democrats in the Senate using reconciliation to pass a final version of Obamacare, one key fact has been overlooked.
No reconciliation bill exists.
Not in the House, not in the Senate, nowhere.
It simply has not yet been written, and there are plenty of reasons to believe it never will be written.
The White House is still telling the public they expect the House to pass the Senate bill, and then both the House and Senate would pass the yet-to-be-drafted reconciliation all before the Easter recess.
Now, what that means here is that the task for Nancy Pelosi is to convince her members of the House that they're going to get their changes.
That is the fixes in the reconciliation bill from the Senate.
And these fixes and that these fixes will be allowed under the bird rules.
Now, we have suggested prior to this that any change in the abortion language would be a violation of the bird rules, uh, bird rule since it has nothing to do with any budgetary things, and that's where reconciliation can be used.
So here comes a parliamentary objection.
Here comes the parliamentary ruling, and then the uh the vice president gets to overrule the parliamentarian.
But all this uh is is is is is really smoke.
Simply put, Nancy Pelosi does not have the votes to pass the Senate bill.
If she did, it would already be law.
To convince her fellow wayward Democrats to vote for the Senate bill.
The yet-to-be drafted reconciliation bill is expected to one scale back the tax on high-end health insurance policies, which will decrease revenue, close the Medicare D loophole, boost insurance subsidies, and increase Medicaid payments.
Now, where exactly do House and Senate aides writing this new bill expect to come up with the money to pay for all these new goodies?
And they have to find that cash because all Reconciliation bills must be certified by the CBO to reduce the deficit by one trillion dollars over five years, and that CBO score will take at least a week, maybe two to complete.
And they cannot score it, as Obama said that it will reduce the deficit because all of this, these four items either cost money that's not now in the bill, or decrease revenue which is in the bill.
They have an unfettered mess here.
Los Angeles Times is uh is well skipped a paragraph.
Uh when will the public get to see the reconciliation bill?
Wall Street Journal reports Democrats have started writing the formal reconciliation bill.
LA Times senior Democrats will not finish writing the reconciliation package until next week at the earliest.
Heritage says don't hold your breath.
We'll continue after this.
And in the midst of all of this, ladies and gentlemen, where is Obama's laser-like focus on jobs?
Where did that hate?
Where did that go?
Well, what happened to that?
All right.
Roll call.
Before we get back to heritage, roll call.
The assumption has been that the House would first need to pass the Christmas Eve Senate bill.
$871 billion.
Actually, more than that.
It's a cheap score.
Anyway, that bill would then be signed into law.
Obama would sign the ball, sign the bill.
Now, this is where, folks, this is where Pelosi really has her work cut out for her.
The assumptions have been the House would first need to pass the bill that's in the Senate, which would then be signed into law, and then followed by a package of fixes through the reconciliation process to appease House Democrats.
Stennie Hoyer said that while the House is constitutionally required to initiate reconciliation bills, that doesn't mean the House would have to pass the Senate bill first before passing a reconciliation bill to amend it.
But Hoyer said, oh, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a second now.
Yeah, we are constitutionally required to initiate reconciliation bills, but that doesn't mean that we would have to pass the Senate bill first.
We could do our reconciliation bill first, have the reconciliation passed by the Senate, and then pass the Senate bill.
From there, Hoyer said the president would have to sign the Senate bill first and then the reconciliation package.
Now he conceded the process he just described here would be more complicated.
But since House lawmakers could effectively be reconciling a bill that hadn't been passed yet.
Now the why.
No, no, Snurdley, it's not a shell game.
The key to understanding why all this is happening is that Pelosi doesn't have the votes.
The House doesn't have the votes because they don't like the Senate bill, and they are scared to death of being told to pass that bill, then the president signs it.
What if Obama and Reed stiff them?
And there's no reconciliation.
They're stuck, they have been screwed, and they know Obama could is very oriented toward doing that kind of thing.
That's why Hoyer is saying, no, wait a minute.
Let's do the reconciliation first.
We know we don't have to pass the Senate bill first.
Let's in front, let's put our changes to the Senate bill first, send it over there and have them deal with it.
I said yesterday is all about who's going to go first here.
So another way of putting this.
The House cannot reconcile anything until there's a bill to reconcile.
Okay.
So at least technically they have to pass the Senate bill first.
And probably the president even needs to sign it into law before they can get their fixes.
And then Obama Senate Democrats could just stab them in the back, throw them overboard, and not pass their fixes at all, which is why Stenny Hoyer is trying to get them to pass the fixes first, which doesn't make sense and is probably technically at least illegal, but it doesn't matter because Joe Biden would okay it.
Because you got rules, you got Democrats, which means you've got No rules.
This um it's it's it's it's fascinating and it's it's it has nothing to do with the Republicans.
It never has had.
The Republicans have no say in this.
Uh uh because they can't fix the Senate bill with 60 votes, not because it's Scott Brown.
So they gotta deal with that bill.
And the House doesn't like it.
And Stupak says, I got twelve guys that are not gonna vote for it that did last time with me.
Now now back to heritage.
In the meantime, Pelosi is bleeding the votes that she needs to first pass the Senate bill by an up or down vote in the House.
Just 220 members of the House voted for it in November.
Since that time, Robert Wexler and Neil Abercrombie have left.
Mertha has uh has passed away.
Joseph Cow, however I know I'm not pronouncing that right.
The the Republican from uh Louisiana, New Orleans, he's now flipping is going to vote against the bill.
That leaves Pelosi with 216 votes, which is exactly enough to pass it.
However, we got Stuck, who will not vote for the Senate bill since it uses taxpayer money to fund abortion.
And Stupec says that he has 12 other members that'll switch from yes to no with him.
And Representative Michael Akuri, a Democrat in New York now says he's likely to switch his vote from yes to no.
Representative Shelley Berkeley, Democrat in Nevada, who voted yes the first time says she's not inclined to support the Senate bill.
Representative Jerry Connolly says he can absolutely switch his vote from yes to no.
And now Congressional Progressive Caucus Representative Raul Givala, or uh Grijalva, from Arizona, says he's less likely to vote for the final health care reform bill if the reconciliation bill contains ideas Obama outlined yesterday.
One House Democrat tells the LA Times why the White House is facing such a tough sell.
It's a no-win situation for those of us in moderate districts.
If you vote no, your base is upset.
If you vote yes, everybody else is upset.
You almost couldn't design a legislative vice more damaging to moderate Democrats, or that puts our majority more at risk.
He's exactly right.
Obama is the one uh uh tightening the screws because he doesn't care.
The level, the degree of narcissism that we see in our president is not we've we've not we've not um seen this radical, a psychological profile in our nation's history.
James Lewis, a great piece on that, by the way, at American Thinker.com.
So here's heritage again.
Don't worry, House Democrats, the Senate's gonna do everything it can to convince you that you aren't going to walk the plank alone again.
Senator Dick Turbin tells Politico that Senate Democrats are planning a gesture sometime next week that will guarantee to House Democrats the Senate will act.
I don't know what the gesture will be, but it will be a convincing gesture.
Well, really.
If you have to have Dick Durbin go out there and promise Democrats in the House, hey, you know what?
We are planning a significant gesture to convince you that we will reconcile the bill you pass to include more of what you want in it.
Now you and I know that trusting any Democrat these days is a risky, and they know it too.
They know who they are.
They know who they are better than we do.
So if you're Bart Stuck and uh Dick Durbin says, hey, hey, don't worry about it, Bart, maybe uh we're gonna have uh significant gesture next week.
Maybe uh convince you how serious we are.
In the meantime, uh what you have here is Kabuki Theater.
So it's a fascinating thing here.
I I um want to re-emphasize here the the focus of attention is on the House of Representatives and the vice the Democrats are in.
I don't care, you know, this moderate Democrat business is uh, you know, we call them blue dogs.
There's a there's a story, there's a it's a distraction story.
But there's a story out today that moderate Democrats in the Senate all of a sudden now are more open to the possibility of reconciliation.
Moderate Democrats in the Look at blue dogs, blue poodles, blue poodles, blue lapdogs, whatever you want to call them, or any moderate Democrats.
This is what we all have to learn and understand.
Let's go to the audio, sound bites.
couple of C I told you so's.
I pegged Obama's speech as a bunch of lies as soon as I read the excerpt.
He's going to lie.
Which he can't help.
He's a liberal.
He has to lie.
He's going to use this lie, this throwaway line, to paint the insurance companies as the villain here.
With not one word about how government intrusions have totally screwed up the market and driven up costs.
So let's go to CNN's Anderson Cooper 180 last night.
He spoke with uh David Rodham Gergen.
He said, uh, what do you think of what uh Obama said today?
What do you think of his chances here moving forward?
I think he mischaracterized the Republican opposition today.
Basically he said today if you vote against my bill, that's because you're voting for the insurance companies.
This is not about insurance companies from a Republican point of view.
It's about, you know, it's about government intervention, a large cost, and a significant uh question marks about it.
And Democrats believe that we have a moral responsibility to provide covers.
That's a legitimate argument.
The insurance argument, I think, is a side argument.
One of many side arguments is a distraction.
I mean, he's done the same thing to the doctors.
Yeah, tonselectomies just for the big bucks, non-necessary tonselectomies, even amputations, Obama said.
These clowns go up there and stand behind him.
Here's the second, see, I told you so, said this yesterday.
We'll see.
I still am not convinced they have the ability to get this done.
I think what we have to do is, because if we adopt that attitude, then there's a natural sense of finality that steps in and the uh passionate opposition to it recedes.
That can't be allowed to happen.
I don't think they're anywhere near actually getting it done.
Last night on Anderson Cooper, sorry.
What the hell difference is the show?
CNN, Wolf Blitzer talking to David Gergen.
David, I assume this White House uh, and uh they a Democrats are strong enough to know if they didn't have the votes, they wouldn't be going through this right now.
I don't think that's true.
I think this is a gamble.
They've doubled down on what they were betting before.
This is his signature issue, he's gonna push it through.
Do you think he could still fail?
Black people have not committed.
The intensity is in the opposition.
And the grassroots movement, if the Republicans get the grassroots to really work on this, they could still keep that big uh opposition out there.
Uh despite Wolf's saying it's gonna pass, right?
David, it's gonna pass.
He's gonna get it right.
Gerges, well, not so sure.
Um it's um it's gonna it's um a lot of people are not committed, and he said the key.
Gergen said the key is whether conservatives keep up the heat.
Huh.
They don't know what heat is.
If they think what they've seen from conservatives, Tea Partiers and all that all across this country is heat.
Up to this point, they haven't the slightest clue what real heat they are about to feel.
I know it's on a ninth, but I haven't gotten an email.
All right, well, all emails are bad in some regard.
Welcome back, folks.
Rushlin bought the EIB net.
What?
I'm trying to.
Mm-hmm.
No, no, no.
I'm saying that none of the changes that Obama lied about yesterday are in a bill yet.
They are not in a bill.
He has not written a bill.
There is no Obama bill.
Only bill that exists is the Senate bill passed on Christmas Eve, and it has none of the reforms or changes, tort reform, Medicare fraud and waste, none of that is in the bill.
The only way it gets in the bill is if there is a reconciliation.
And the House is scared to death that if they pass the Senate bill as is and Obama signs it, that that's it.
It was a total lie.
There is no Obama bill.
Now, why should these Democrats trust Obama to keep his word?
He has broken his word to Democrats in his base on lots of things, from closing Gitmo to leaving Iraq and Afghanistan to ending don't ask, don't tell to all kinds of other things big and small.
If you lose your seat by being loyal, like a Corzine or a cochley, they come out and use a little Fortney Pete Stark lingo and urinate all over your memory and say that you were a lousy candidate.
The Obama White House, who was who was the Democrat candidate for Virginia?
They can't forget this guy's name.
Remember the Obama White House threw Creedy.
They threw poor old Creebies under the bus, off the bus, over the cliff two weeks before the election.
Blamed him for not listening to them.
Why would Democrats trust Obama?
He's asking them to give up their careers for his own narcissism.
Let me go through a longer list.
Let's go through a list of Obama's accomplishments.
Shall we?
Why shouldn't Democrats trust Obama and vote for Obama coming?
What could possibly go wrong in no particular order?
The Khalid Sheikh Muhammad trial in New York City.
That's really going to work out well for New York, and notice they haven't give up on this.
The non-closing of the promised closing of Gitmo.
Hey, Democrats, do you remember Virginia, New Jersey, and the Kennedy seat?
Just why would you trust Obama and vote for his legislative agenda?
Look at his accomplishments.
He lost the Kennedy seat.
He lost Corzine.
He lost Tim Kane.
He lost whoever.
He lost Virginia.
And he's going to lose a lot more.
Also, you Democrats need to keep in mind Obama's saying jobs is his focus while he's obsessing over the destruction of the best health care system in the world, ours.
Newspapers are running endless stories of Obama's thug chief of staff being more competent than the president is.
You know, even David Broder has weighed in on that one today.
Details are coming up.
Obama reading the teleprompter and saying, Corpseman?
corpsmen Two big-time embarrassing flops at Copenhagen.
One the Chicago Olympics, the other the stupid climate bill.
Obama versus Paul Ryan.
You remember how that went?
At the healthcare summit?
Obama versus El Rushball.
Told everybody not to listen to me.
I don't want to brag here, ladies and gentlemen, but uh our audience measurement ratings have never been higher.
Um thinking it important to send out a ditz to teach America how to sneeze to avoid a phony non-existent flu emergency.
The new Black Panthers, the out-of-control deficit and national debt, rising out of control unemployment, apologizing around the world for the country he leads, greatest country in the planet, that he wants to remake in Venezuela's image, the teleprompter, bashing a decorated Cambridge police officer for doing his job and being white, and Joe Biden claiming Iraq as a great Obama accomplishment.
Now, you Democrats in the House, you really need to sit back here and review this list of accomplishments.
Let me rephrase it.
There aren't any.
There are massive sell-offs, massive sell-outs.
There are all kinds of betrayals.
The things that he has gotten done are not good for you because you're going to lose your seat.
And now the biggest nuke of all, Obamacare, narcissism care, is going to be the virtual end of your career.
And in the words of Fortney Pete Stark, Obama is going to urinate on your leg and tell you it's just rain.
Oh, yeah, when they found that it was me that wanted to do it, oh, before they knew it was I who wanted to know it.
Oh, they were ecstatic.
Friendly, warm, and then they found out that I was the guy behind it, and you can just see the ice in the emails.
I can't tell you yet, folks, what I'm talking about, but it won't be long.
Because we're gonna go nuclear either way.
It has nothing to do with healthcare, by the way.
Zilch Zero Nada.
I don't mean to tease you like that.
I was talking to snerdling and I had to finish the conversation.
▲
Export Selection