All Episodes
Previous Next
March 3, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:28
March 3, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It is thick out there, folks.
We have just been delivered the biggest pile of manure.
Yet, with this health care speech, practically every line is not true.
Anyway, greetings and welcome back, Rushland.
This is the EIB Network.
Great to have you here.
The uh telephone number 80082882, the email address, Ilrushbo at EIBNet.com.
And if you want to comment on this, of course, we'll get to your phone calls in this hour.
The audacity here, everything on health care has been said.
Everything's been said.
So the message from the President of the United States is shut up, debate over, bend over.
Everything's been said.
This, after he and his tyrannical party has decided to ignore and overrule the explicit things being said by the American people, which is hell no, we don't want this.
He just got through saying it's passed in the Senate by 60 votes.
Passed in a House by cyber majority.
Now we're gonna do it.
Well, if it passed in both how why don't we have it?
And then he starts this, well, Republicans.
Bush got his tax cuts a simple majority.
We need health care with a simple majority.
After we've got eight sound bites of him decrying, criticizing, demanding that the very rule he's gonna break never be broken.
It's like I said the other day, folks, you have rules and you have Democrats, and that means you have no rules.
So it'll be interesting to see what kind of fallout there is from this on the part of the American people.
Because this was I mean, I have never heard health care presented in a rosier fashion.
We're gonna reduce costs, we're gonna reduce the deficit by a trillion dollars over two decades, and these are not my numbers.
These are the CBO numbers, the referee determine how much stuff costs here.
Uh I've this n it's not true.
It simply isn't true.
He says, if you want to keep your doctor, you keep your uh uh plan.
You can't know.
I don't I don't know what plan he's got, but every plan that's out there, either one of them, the House or Senate version, we're beating a dead horse here.
How long before we have a doctor's union?
I mean, we w uh with these kind of people that are in the room.
You know, we're we're we're on the path to single payer folks.
That's what this is.
And everything he said to the contrary is an out and out lie.
Now, while you're out there keeping track of the number of times Nancy Pelosi is going to declare that she can get Obama's health care pan passed.
Remember, there's a lot of illusion going on out here.
For a year, Pelosi and Reed have both Oh, yeah, we got the votes.
Oh, yeah, we've got and they've never had the votes.
And they're gonna be out there doing it again.
Oh, we gotta go reconciliation, though, but uh, we got the votes.
We're going to, we're gonna get it done.
While you keep track of the number of times Pelosi says that she can get the votes for Obama's health care plan to get it passed, make sure you take note of the Senate past jobs bill last week.
More of the same spend as we go and prove positive that the number of ideas in the wheelhouse of this administration is very few.
If the first $800 billion did not affect the unemployment figures, well, the first $800 billion did affect the unemployment numbers.
They went up.
If the unemployment numbers rising as rapidly as they have, baffled and surprised, the so-called economists, then why would more money thrown at the same problem in the same way work again?
What we need here are new ideas.
We need people and organizations to get them into the arena, and there is an organization that is a warehouse for ideas, it's the Heritage Foundation, and I just want to I just want to give you a heads up later today or first thing in the morning, they are going to have the most authentic, detailed, right on analysis of this drivel that we just heard, and anybody else has.
And that's not to put anybody down.
I'm not, but the Heritage Foundation, it's where I'm going to go.
AskHeritage.org is where I'm going to go because they have right now the Brainiacs in that place are tearing down this speech word by word, lie by lie.
And they're going to have the truth of what was really said here today at some point at Askheritage.org.
And they're going to have not just an analysis, but they will have genuine free market solutions and ideas on how to create jobs, how to stop this massive health care plan.
If you want, I tell you, if you want more than a sneak peek, which you can, I mean, you can go to the Heritage Foundation website right now, and you don't need to be a member, but you're not going to be able to see nearly a smidgen.
Barely a smidgen of what they have there.
You need to join AskHeritage.org.
Just become a member, $25 donation.
Now is the time.
Greatest bunch of people.
I can't wait for them to break this down.
I mean, if I weren't working on this program, I'd break it down myself.
But I obviously I have my uh my my commitments and responsibilities here.
But tomorrow, it's Hiroshima time, folks.
It's Nagasaki that he thinks he's going nuclear.
Wait till we get to this tomorrow.
Mm-hmm.
He said that.
He said this is not about the next election, and the one after that, and it's not about politics.
My plan would stop arbitrary premium.
Oh, price controls.
Yeah, that really is work.
Price control, Medicare and Medicaid price controls.
That's really worked, hasn't it?
Look at this.
The funny, a lot of funny stuff in this speech, too.
We've recorded a lot of good Republican ideas from the summit.
Like state grants for tort, medical malpractice reform.
What is that?
What are state grants for medical malpractice reform?
And then he said the next great idea the Republicans had eliminating fraud and waste.
As though if the Republicans had proposed it, fraud and waste would still be in his health care plan.
That's a Republican idea.
Sadly it is, but I mean it's it's that's not a Republican idea.
That's a family budget common sense idea.
And then he had this and in his summary was talking about all the Republican ideas that have been incorporated.
And then he had to start bashing them.
Republican plan, we'll only ensure three million.
My plan, 31 million.
And by the way, uh cut the deficit trillion dollars at the same time.
Numbers won't work.
They don't add up.
We talked about the coffee party yesterday.
This new uh grassroots uh offshoot of the Tea Party.
Guess what?
The grassroots organizer of the progressive alternative to the Tea Parties, the Coffee Party, has been exposed as an Obama political operative.
The Tea Party so-called candidate in Nevada for the Senate is an Obama or Harry Reed associate.
Now, the the if you if you'd read the this is newsbusters.org, if you had read the profiles of the Coffee Party founder, Annabelle Park in the Washington Post and New York Times, you wouldn't have had a hint as to her extensive political activity in the Obama campaign.
Uh it's a simple internet search, which the Times apparently is incapable of doing, reveals that um Annabelle Park organized the coffee party for the specific purpose of undermining the Tea Party movement.
And she is a former strategy analyst at the New York Times, one of the organizers and operators of the United for Obama video channel at YouTube.
She's an official part of the uh of the campaign.
And she made it sound so well, it made it sound so moderate until you read the mission statement.
And then if you read the mission statement that these people had, uh, it was all about uh our communal things we have in common.
It was it was uh it was a manifesto of type.
So anyway, the Tea Party is really bugging them, and they're coming up with their phony reaction to it.
You realize nothing.
There is no what we got, grassroots, genuine effervescent support for Barack Obama.
Every shred of support is manufactured.
It is organized from this White House website, that union website, or a different White House website, or some phony like this coming along and creating a coffee party.
Uh, nothing is genuine.
There is not one genuine percolating grassroots support for Obama.
It all has to be managed, it all has to be uh uh maneuvered, it has to be inspired, directed, has to be paid for.
It's uh it's amazing to watch General Motors is preparing for another management shakeup.
Does that mean we're getting rid of Obama?
Let me read this.
Um Detroit Free Press.
General Motors uh is preparing for another shakeup, could be announced as soon as when.
I guess today.
The shakeup comes as industry sales uh results for February set to be released, analysts believe Ford did.
Ford outsold them all.
Oh, and have you heard?
I love this.
General Motors having to recall these 1.3 million little cars, the cobalt and whatever.
They're blaming the same supplier that provides power steering motors to Toyota.
So Obama.
All right, your phone calls are coming up after this time out.
And we're back.
By the way, Ed sound bites.
Grab number two through five, have them ready to go at a moment's notice.
Because I the really the most the most amazing thing, well, it's hard to say what the most amazing thing about the speech was, but he's talking about how Bush got all these major plans done with we didn't he didn't have 60 votes, and he didn't have 60 votes for this, we didn't need 60 votes for that, we did 60 votes.
All these tapes examples of Obama decrying the notion that we don't need 60 votes in the Senate, we can't go 50 plus one, that's not the way they get big reforms done.
These people will they they will just I mean, Harry Reid last week's we're nobody's talking about reconciliation.
And here we just have the president of the United States essentially ordering reconciliation today.
I mean, these people will lie about everything.
They simply don't care.
And one of the reasons why, if you're even interested in why, one of the reasons why, is they know that the buddies they have in the media are just gonna go right along with them.
They're not gonna check this, they're gonna fact check, they're not gonna point out all this as a bunch of garbage.
Anyway, to the phones.
Chris in Erie.
Is that right?
Erie Colorado, great to have you on the program.
Oh, megadiddles, right.
Thank you.
Um, you know, what has really bothered me about these folks all along is these are the people that think they can tax their way to prosperity and this plan they have to tax America and then not spend health care funds in 1220, I guess.
That can't work.
These guys are deficit spinners.
They're gonna blow our money before health key even starts.
And um, you know, the they really, this is the MO of these folks, is they think they can spend their way out of trouble.
And they're gonna save our money.
Um, you know, see this is what I have a problem with.
Nobody is this stupid to think that this is going to end our trouble.
Nobody is this stupid.
Now, they may be this ideologically blind, but nobody's this stupid.
Particularly after 14 months of utter destruction to the U.S. private sector.
There's just this, that's why I maintain this is purposeful.
This is being done for a specific reason, and they're not saying what it is.
I am, but they're not.
This is not about lowering your insurance costs, lowering your premium.
This is not about making sure that you get treated for whatever you want whenever you want it, and you're not gonna have to pay for it.
This is not about improving health care in America, because none of that happens with this.
This is about destruction.
Barack Obama, the most unknown person to be elected president in this country's history.
What do we know about him?
We don't know what his grades were.
I mean, we know who his associates were and so forth, but we we don't he's the most the least vetted candidate that we've ever had.
Now, those of us who no longer pay attention to the drive-bys, we found out as much as we needed to know about this.
The first thing we needed to know is he's a liberal.
He was never a centrist.
He's never been a centrist about anything.
He speaks a good centrist game, but he never's never been a unifier.
Barack Obama has never unified anybody.
Never.
He's never brought anybody together.
It's never happened.
And yet there were enough saps in this country who bought the drivel and thought it would be also nice if it could happen.
But this is not the guy to do it.
We also found out that Barack Obama's a guy doesn't like this country.
The way he's been educated, the way he was brought up, he thinks this country is almost criminal in the way it's behaved.
Stolen resources from around the world from other countries that weren't ours.
We have pursued a rich and unwarranted lifestyle while causing poverty around the world.
Our military has committed murder around the world.
Our CIA has committed murder around the world.
We have militarized space.
We have created the deadliest weapons.
We have stolen the genuine wealth of the true earners of that wealth in this country.
All the rich people in this country are only rich because they stole it from the people who did the real work and should have been paid the real money.
And so, by golly by God, it's payback time now.
It's payback time.
And everybody who loves this country and who thinks it's the greatest country that's ever been is going to have to get their mind right.
Because we don't deserve that as immoral and as unjust and as imperialistic as we have been.
That's his mindset.
That's the mindset of his preacher.
It's the mindset of Calypso Louie, another friend of his.
It's a mindset of half the union leaders, if not more.
It is the mindset of many of his professors at Harvard.
And many of your kids'professors at whatever school they're going to.
That's what he's been taught.
And his number one influence was a guy named Frank Marshall Davis, who also hated this country, an avowed communist and Marxist, who hated this country, while living in Hawaii.
Go figure.
Suzanne in Benton Harbor, Michigan.
Great to have you on the EIB Network.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
Hey.
I'm so thrilled to talk to you.
Thank you.
Um, my question is, uh if they manage to get this reconciliation pushed through, um, other than, you know, of course, probably a lot of Democrats losing their seats, um, what do you think is going to happen at that point and what kind of recourse do we have?
Um, and as citizens, do we have any way to fight this on our own?
Um at the ballot box first and foremost, but you mean if this actually gets written into law and signed by Obama, what can we do?
If they get this health care pushed pushed through the the way they're talking about it now, well, with this reconciliation process, what what do you think is gonna be the next phase or the next step or what do you think happens next?
I actually shudder to think.
I don't think any of these people in Washington uh uh understand the depth of anger and outrage over how this is being done and what is being done.
The absolute total in-your-face governance of the president and the and and his party.
I saw Tom Coburn was asked this question by a reporter at Fox the other day, and a reporter said, Look, the Democrats are committing suicide.
Why not let them have this bill, let them have it, and let them lose big, and then when you guys get power back in November, just start tearing it apart.
He said it sounds great, but but rolling back big pieces of legislation like this is really, really hard.
He didn't say why.
But let me ask you, are you aware of any entitlement that's ever been streamlined, reduced, canceled, or rolled back?
No.
No, and I'm terrified of what's going to happen if this gets through.
And we've I have two children, and my husband has been through two jobs in the last couple of years, and we have gone without insurance.
And I know what it's like, and I still am just absolutely furious over this.
It's being shoved down my throat.
And I feel helpless, and I don't know if there's any way to fight it.
I mean, other than voting, but you know, by November it may be too late.
Well, I we'll see.
I I still am not convinced they have the ability to get this done.
I think we all we what we have to do is because if we adopt that attitude, then there's a natural sense of uh finality that that steps in and the uh passionate opposition to it uh recedes.
That can't be allowed to happen.
I don't think they're anywhere near actually getting it done.
Making more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying.
You're waiting on two figures uh this week on Friday, the latest opinion audit numbers uh of me uh from the Sullivan group.
We're expecting a a drop, by the way, in my accuracy because of my uh uh uh incorrect opinion that the Republicans should not have gone to the uh Obama health care summit.
But we'll wait and see.
Uh the snow well, I'm not gonna say the snow had any effect on my opinion on it uh or my accuracy.
But we are also expecting the unemployment numbers to come out on uh on Friday as well.
And we know the snow apparently they're gonna be disastrous because the uh Council of Economic Advisors guy Larry Summers, don't even don't even pay any attention to them.
Uh the blizzards nothing about trends in these numbers.
Okay, Mike in um Marion, Iowa.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hey, thanks, Rush.
Uh Megadetto's from the frozen tundra of Eastern East Central Iowa.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, somebody has to be there.
Yeah, that's great.
Um my question is, what bill are the Democrats talking about reconciling?
Is it H.R. 3200?
Uh yeah, it's the House bill.
Okay.
Well that's HR 3200.
Yeah, they haven't there's not a new one.
Okay.
So that's that but but it's uh it's it's this whole reconciliation it it's a confusing term because it's the actual term is budget reconciliation, and it is uh it is an exception to the 60 vote requirement in the Senate,
which is a Senate rule, long-standing Senate rule, and it is used only for items that have budgetary consequences because the Constitution requires that.
And so they made an exception to the 60 vote rule.
Now, Tom Harkin, Senator from Iowa, your blowhard Senator told the politico this afternoon that Senate Democrat leaders, and and this is no surprise, have decided to go the reconciliation route.
So here's what he said is going to happen.
The House will first pass the Senate bill after Senate leaders demonstrate to House leaders that they have the votes to pass reconciliation in the Senate.
So, as I understand this, the House goes first, and they will, without conference committee, without making any changes in it, they will pass the Senate bill.
Therefore, a new bill will be coming out of the House.
That bill will then go to the Senate, where instead of a conference, they will use reconciliation to add things to it that were not in it originally, such as the public option or whatever else the House Democrats want, and to really beef it up.
But they'll do it item by item by item.
And the Republicans have the opportunity to object and demand amendments and so forth, uh call for parliamentary uh parliamentary uh points of order, parliamentarian rule.
If Biden doesn't like the rule, he can overrule the parliamentarian.
It can take a long time.
It's going to be a bloody process.
And the Republicans, once you free the Republicans uh from the 60 vote business, uh then it's it's a little easier for them to slow it down by just putting thumb tax in the road at every attempt to reconcile the House bill that the Senate engages in.
So essentially, if if if Harkin has this right, they're essentially going to be reconciling their own bill after the after the House passes it.
Okay.
Well, I I seen Rick Santorum on uh Fox News last night.
Yeah.
And he had said um the only thing the Republicans can really do is just add amendment after amendment after amendment, and then they'll go through their processes of you know getting rid of them.
But uh, you know, all they can really do is try and slow it down that way.
That's pretty much that that's that's pretty much true.
That's you know, and I I have to tell you something.
I I don't normally uh I I don't normally uh go off in this kind of a tangent, but I just I so many DC pundits over the past three months, including some of the Fox All-Stars, poo-pooed all this talk of reconciliation.
They'll never do reconciliation, they'll never do that.
That's just a bunch of talk radio lingo.
They'll never do reconciliation.
And here we are.
The door has just been opened to reconciliation.
I I look it, I hope I have not confused you more with uh with this explanation.
Well, no, I'm not confused.
Uh I was just curious because uh the reconciliation process is through the Senate.
So that means they have to have a bill to do that.
They've already passed the the their one Senate bill that they have, so then it has to be H.R. 3200.
That's the one that they're gonna do.
And then, well, no, that may not be the case, and I'm gonna double-check this because I think I'm just going on what Harkin said here to the politico.
The House will first pass the Senate bill.
Okay, which if if again, if I'm reading that right, H.R. 3200's history, the Senate bill becomes the House bill.
This that new House bill, which is just the original Senate bill, then goes back to the Senate, and then they start adding all the dirt to it.
Okay that the House bill had, but it they couldn't pass it in a conference committee, they couldn't get um the Democrats couldn't agree on those two bills.
They had a House bill, Senate Bill, 3200, as you're saying, and whatever the Senate bill number was, and they couldn't, the Republicans couldn't stop either one up until Scott Brown came along.
They couldn't, they couldn't agree on on a lot of this.
That's why they're going reconciliation.
So there's there's one minor potential prattfall here, and that is the level of distrust that exists between the Democrats and the House and the Senate.
As I said earlier, neither one, I mean, the House went first on cap and trade, the House went first on this, and they took all the heat because they're the ones that put the communism in the bill.
Uh let me rephrase that.
They're the ones that intensified and amplified the communism in the bill.
And the Senate said, oh, gee, I we can't uh we're not gonna get the big that's that's when you had Mary Landrew and Blanche Lincoln and and uh Ben Nelson, well, that got a public option.
Okay, okay, how about a Cornhusker kickback for your vote?
Oh, okay.
And Mary, how about a new Louisiana purchase?
We'll exempt you from all of our punitive Medicare expenses.
Louisiana and Nebraska will have to pay them.
Okay, I'll take it, and Schwarzenegger said, but to me.
And they said, screw you, you're a Republican.
In name only.
So that's the history of this is that you didn't have two bills that could be reconciled or conferenced in the normal procedure.
And after they were put together, you would not get 60 votes on that final bill in the Senate.
That's why we're here.
And then when Scott Brown won the election, bye-bye 60 votes.
So no longer 60 votes ceased to be a factor because they didn't have them.
I mean, the real history of this.
The American people through their elected representatives in election after election after election and vote after vote after vote have rejected this every which way possible.
But that doesn't mean anything to our young, unqualified president.
He wants this.
And despite the fact that he has said we should never change Senate rules for policy legislation.
Never.
That's tearing at the fabric of what the founders said.
Here he is doing it today.
So, a brief history.
Just to help maybe...
This is what we do here as we make the complex understandable.
So, the House passed a health care bill that had every, every, every destructive element Obama wanted in it.
You lose your insurance coverage, public option, bye-bye insurance companies on the private zone.
It had it all.
It was all there.
Problem was, Ben Nelson, Mary Landrew, Blanche Lincoln, and a couple others, and Olympius No said, I'm not going for public option, there's no way I'm voting for that.
So they couldn't get 60 votes in the Senate for an identical House bill.
So they got a different bill.
A watered down version of the Senate bill.
Time to compromise.
Time to go to the conference committee.
Big time arguments.
Wouldn't happen.
Even if they came to some sort of agreement, they still have to go back to the Senate and get 60 votes again on the conferenced bill with a compromise between the two.
And again, Blanche Lincoln and uh Ben Nelson and Mary Landry's.
No, we're uh not going public option.
And it stalled and it stalled, and then Scott Brown was elected.
And that takes 60 votes off the table.
So they can't use normal rules.
They were, they were stopped dead in their tracks.
It was finished.
They were crying, oh no, we lose it for another 10 years.
We can't go back to it.
Obama said, oh, we're gonna do it.
So they started talking about reconciliation while denying they were talking about reconciliation and all the immediate pundits in Washington.
Ah, they'll never do reconciliation.
So what's going to happen now is the Senate bill that is watered down at this point, the Senate bill that does not have the public, the Senate bill doesn't have half of what Obama said today.
Now it's key to what Obama said in his speech today has never passed a joint session of Congress, meaning a Senate House conference compromise.
It has never passed.
It couldn't get 60 votes.
That's the whole reason we're at this stage.
So here's the trick.
The House has got to trust the Senate.
The House will pass the Senate bill.
They'll send it over there as though there's no Nancy Pelosi gonna rubber stamp it.
It doesn't have public options in it, ostensibly.
It doesn't have all these things in it.
It may strip out the uh Cornhusker kickback, but I think Landry's gonna get her deal still.
So in essence, what is the Senate bill will become the House bill.
Then that bill goes over to the Senate and the reconciliation process where only 51 votes per amendment, per ad, whatever, are necessary to pass it.
In a clear violation of Senate rules.
And that's so when you hear that the House bill uh is going to be reconciled, it's actually the original Senate bill sent over there that they rubber stamp.
I'm Long here in this segment.
I have to take a break.
I know it's tough because you love learning and you like the sound of my voice more than I do.
But I have to take a brief time out.
We'll be back and continue after this.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, man, oh man, oh man.
New York Congressman Eric Massa, a Democrat will not seek re-election after only one term in orifice.
Literally.
According to several House aides on both sides of the aisle, a House Ethics Committee has been informed of allegations that Representative Eric Massa, Democrat New York, who is married with two children, sexually harassed a male staffer.
He's a 20-year vet uh Navy veteran was elected to orifice last November, serves on the Agriculture Armed Services and Homeland Security Committees.
I wonder if he's going to could this be one less vote for Pelosi.
I don't know.
Doubt it.
They'll hang in there.
Here's uh here's Adam in Shinston, West Virginia.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Oh, Rush.
Ditto's from Mountaineer Country.
Thank you, sir.
I was just wondering what your thoughts were on if the Democrats push reconciliation this week.
If you think that the Republicans could repeal it in the fall if they gain back both houses, since the effects don't take effect till 2016.
Well, what are your thoughts on that?
Well, well, interesting question.
There are two implementation dates.
The implementation of all of the new tax increases and all of the new regulations start immediately.
The so-called benefits, the spending.
Doesn't start for four years or so, or five.
And that's a budget gimmick for Obama and his buddies to be able to say it comes in under a trillion dollars.
So basically you're going to have ten years of taxes and six years of spending or five, whatever it is.
But still rolling it back, repealing it, uh, Tom Cobra.
I can only tell you what Coburn said.
I'm going to be talking to some of these guys in the coming days.
Because a club for growth meeting down here this week, a bunch of these guys are going to be in town, and I have some meetings set up.
I'm going to find out what the strategic is.
And I'm going to I'm going to find out exactly what's involved, because I've never seen it happen.
I've never seen what by definition, this is this is an entitlement, and by definition, an entitlement can't be touched.
By definition, we can't roll back Social Security.
We can't roll back Medicare Medicaid.
That's when you hear that 60% of the federal budget is entitlement spending, it means there can never be budget cuts in that.
It's the discretionary side, which is becoming less and less and less of the budget.
And this is just another one of these entitlements.
So anyway, about health care.
I owe you another mention of Zycam, ladies and gentlemen.
And I want to stress once more that my favorite delivery system for this, I'm close to calling it a miracle product, is the new oral spray.
It serves as a as a breath spray, but it's also the fastest, easiest way, at least for me, to get the medication working fast.
You just spray it four times in your mouth, follow the directions, it's easy to do.
Everybody knows how to open their mouth.
And you shoot it in there, spray it in there three times, four times, uh, every three hours.
The minute you think you're coming down with a cold, the moment, if you wait a day, it may not work.
It's gotta be the minute you first symptom you think you have.
Even if it's if it's not, if you're wrong, it's no big deal because the stuff won't hurt you.
But if you do it, it will reduce the severity and uh the symptoms will will not be nearly as bad, won't won't slow you down.
The stuff works, and I continue to get testimonials on this at all times.
It's great to have Zycam as a sponsor on this program because it's the best thing you can say about a sponsored product is it works.
Zycam works.
If you don't have any, get some.
We're still in cold season.
Ladies and gentlemen, the Sullivan Group, the opinion auditing firm in Sacramento, Just sent me an email.
They are suspending the audit of my opinions for the month of February.
Given the way Obama is using that summit in his hype, the Sullivan Group is of the opinion I could still end up being right on my opinion that the Republicans should not have gone.
So the audit of my opinions for the month of February has been suspended.
▲
Export Selection