All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 9, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:30
December 9, 2009, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this show, documented to be almost always right, 99.5% of the time.
I am Rush Limboy, your guiding light.
Don't doubt me.
Our telephone number, 800-282-2882, and the email address lrushball at EIB net.com.
You know, it's amazing to me how the uh state-controlled media is totally absorbed in the Tiger Woods story, but they had to be dragged kicking and screaming to the John Edwards story.
Remember that?
Could we say that the uh media's racist on this?
We could.
I mean, using their own definitions.
The latest on the Tiger story is, and I frankly, I don't know what to believe in this and what not to believe.
I mean, I uh there's just we got we're up we're up now to uh 11 babes.
We gone from porn to pancakes with uh the occupations.
We have uh Gatorade announcing yesterday that it's dropping uh its tiger woods sports drink, uh Gatorade Focus.
And they said, well, no, this has nothing to do with the uh scandal.
We had made this decision uh long time ago.
Uh just said the timing just happens to be coincidental.
That got me to thinking.
I was uh I was flash emailing, it was instant messaging with uh some friends last night about all this.
Why would you cancel uh Tiger Woods uh Gatorade Focus Dr. I mean, he forget the scandal.
It must not be selling, right?
I mean, even before the scandal.
He also was a uh celebrity spokesman for Buick, but they didn't renew.
So he went out and he got ATT to uh put their logo on his bag.
And then they wanted him to play in the ATT program.
He said, now there's too many people, I don't like the six-hour rounds, and I don't like the Poppy Hills course.
It's a bad course, which everybody agrees with.
So they got rid of the Poppy Hills course, replaced with somebody else, and they they paired the field, so the rounds will be five hours now, and I don't think Tiger was gonna go.
Uh I just I'm I well, I'm just I'm gonna stop it right there because I I don't know what to believe about this.
I I really with with all that's being like for example, the latest story, and I think this is either TMZ or radar online, I forget which, is that uh Tiger and Ellen are working really, really hard here to put it all back together, thinking of leaving the country.
Uh that she has recently purchased a mansion in Sweden, and that they are thinking of going there.
Uh, to uh to escape it.
And then we have Rachel Yukatel who came in.
Look, and I never made love with the guy.
You know, I'm I'm an arranger.
You know, she handles the whales in Vegas.
That's you know, the whales of these people that come in and willingly lose millions of dollars in the casinos every year.
They're housed in the you know, the top-of-the-line suites and villas at these hotels, and and uh they have to be entertained and massaged, and that's what she claims she was.
She'd handled the whales in Vegas, which I didn't know that Tiger was a whale.
I don't know Tiger loses millions of dollars.
Gamblers.
There's all kinds of stuff here.
Uh but nevertheless, Gatorade, this that that aspect of it is true.
They dropped their Tiger Woods drink.
But that was just it was just coincidental.
They had nothing to do with this.
It was planned uh long time ago.
But I noticed that the TARP extension money, uh, the TARP extension by the tax cheat, uh, Timothy Geitner, they've extended TARP until 2010.
I happen to notice that they extended in 2010 to right before the congressional elections.
So I've always known, I have always because I know these people.
These are slush funds, both the stimulus and TARP slush funds for the election of Democrats.
Now here's a story from CNN Money.com.
Fourteen months and 700 billion dollars later, did the federal TARP bailout do the job.
A bailout watchdog group addressing those questions In a report released today gave the troubled asset relief program a mixed report card.
The Congressional Oversight Panel found that TARP stopped the financial panic and stabilized the banking system after the once-in-a-lifetime measure was hurriedly enacted in October last year.
But the panel wrote that the bailout failed to stem problems like lackluster lending and growing foreclosures that still plague the economy.
It even suggests that TARP may have done harm by making some banks and firms considered too big for regulators to allow them to fail even bigger.
And be creating a new expectation that banks will always be saved.
So the watchdog group says, you know, on balance, it isn't any good.
On balance, it may have done harm.
This did be ended as quickly as possible.
And Obama salivating at the chance to get his hands on this money to quote unquote create jobs.
This is going to be one of the biggest stashes of walking around money that any politician has ever had to dispense.
Here's uh the main committee report lays out the key areas where TARP has missed its mark.
Many consumers and businesses are still having trouble getting loans.
Banks are still failing at a fast pace.
Toxic assets remain on balance sheets of large banks.
Foreclosures continue to grow, and jobs remain scarce.
Now, TARP stands for Tr uh Troubled Asset Relief Program.
You remember when it was originally forced in there?
Well, what was the original stated purpose of TARP?
Buy right.
To buy toxic assets from the banks left over from the subprime mortgage crisis, worthless paper that they created new investment products to try to give themselves a little insurance with those off the books of the banks.
They're still there.
And then after Treasury Secretary was given sole discretion how to use the money.
After it was then signed and authorized, Henry Paulson, the Bush Treasury Secretary, said, you know what?
We're going to change this.
We're gonna we're gonna uh give money to some of these uh banks so they can start lending.
And remember, some institutions were not chartered as banks, so they changed their charter to become banks so that they could get some of the money.
Some Wall Street firms became banks so that they could get some of them.
I always thought that one of the things going on here was Paulson taking care of his buddies who also have homes in the Hamptons and didn't want to lose them.
I mean, his people do tend to hang together.
Here's another CNN Money.com story.
Residential real estate owners suffered through another down year, but losses were much lower than 2008.
I have discovered the media trick here in reporting this bad news.
The trick is that they report things uh as being not as bad as last year.
I have seen articles saying retail is not down as much as last year.
What is not said is that last year and this year are all down from record lows.
It doesn't matter.
They're using last year as a benchmark.
It's not quite as bad as last year.
So things are improving.
They're not.
Both years are at record lows.
They can spin it all they want, but the news is bad.
Here's how they do it.
American homeowners will have lost nearly 500 billion dollars in home value by year's end.
Poof.
Gone.
After one year of Obama, five hundred billion dollars in home value gone.
Still, next paragraph, still, that's a big improvement over 2008 when values fell by 3.6 trillion, according to a report release.
So the total now then would be 4.1 trillion in two years.
And they want to try to spin that as good news.
And by the way, I you watched these job numbers that gave us 10% unemployment.
They're going to be revised.
The labor department's already admitted that they undercounted some 400,000 people out of work.
It's not 10%, it's much higher.
They're going to revise those numbers.
They're going to be revising these numbers all the way through the spring, by the way.
The gigantic Los Angeles market suffered the largest total loss in home value at $60.8 billion.
Metro Chicago values fell 49.6 billion, New York dropped 49 billion.
Negative equity is the most important predictor of default.
And here it is.
Administration warns of command and control regulation over emissions.
The Obama administration is warning Congress if it doesn't move to regulate greenhouse gases, the Environmental Protection Agency will take a command and control role over the process in a way that could hurt business.
The warning from a top White House economic official who spoke Tuesday on condition of anonymity came on the eve of EPA administrator Lisa Jackson's address to the International Conference on Climate Change in Copenhagen.
Jackson, however, tried to strike a tone of cooperation in her address, explaining the EPA's new powers to regulate greenhouse gases, will be used to complement legislation pending in Congress, not replace it.
This is not either or it's uh uh it's a both and moment.
But the official said if you don't pass this legislation, the EPA is gonna have to regulate in this area, and it's not going to be able to regulate on a market-based way, so it's gonna have to be uh command and control way, which will probably generate even more uncertainty.
This is exactly what they want.
They're holding this out here.
You you guys in Congress, you better act, or we're gonna have to do it.
Basically, what's happening here is that the uh United States House of Representatives and the United States Senator being blackmailed by Barack Obama through Lisa Jackson at the EPA.
If you guys don't do it, we are.
If you don't pass Cap and Trade, it won't matter because we're going to implement it anyway by fiat.
United States of America.
Home of the free, land of the brave, but not for long.
So the way I read the way AP is handling this uh uh uh economic news.
So last year American home values lost 3.6 uh trillion this year only 500 billion.
So that's we're improving.
So I the way to look at it then would be if Tiger only has seven affairs next year, then he's going a long way to putting his marriage back together.
Is it is that how the AP would report that?
Speaking of which, folks, there is another.
Here it is.
Uh another another woman.
I think this puts us up number 12, Sweden.
One of Sweden's top female celebrities at claiming she was approached by an agent on behalf of Tiger Woods about having a fling with the star golfer.
Carolina Jinning, who famously had sex in front of the cameras on the Big Brother reality TV show, before transitioning to a career as a TV presenter, was a staple on the London party scene at the time of the incident, which took place six or seven years ago, according to a post on her blog.
Uh she explains that she was at a party where she met a really strange man who she assumed was gay, who proceeded to ask her out to lunch.
He wanted to tell me something special.
She wrote this in her December 8th blog post, which is uh today.
Sorry, yesterday.
Jenning nevertheless accepted the invitation to dine at a private table at a swanky London eatery, where the man launched into what she found to be an unusual line of questioning.
He wondered if I knew who Tiger Woods was.
And obviously I did.
He said he was friends with Tiger and that Tiger loved girls like me.
What?
Girls that have sex on TV.
Oh.
At the time, Jinning was doing her best to portray herself as a stereotypical buxom Swedish blonde, complete with what she refers to as gigantic silicon breasts and bleach blonde hair.
He said that Tiger was looking for a girlfriend that he wanted to introduce me to him.
I never got back to the guy, obviously.
Even if Tiger's rich, he's also ugly as sin and absolutely not my type.
So I guess we count counter as number eleven.
She was approached, but this thing never happened.
J. Oh, wait, wait.
Jinning, who has since removed her breast implants and auctioned them off for charity, thought the you read right, you heard right.
Jinning, who has since removed her breast implants and auctioned them off for charity, thought the whole exchange was messed up and had since forgotten about the incident, but in a wake of recent revelations about Wood's unspecified infidelities, she now views the meeting in a different light.
Was that guy a pimp for Tiger?
She's now asking herself.
It does it could have been just some guy with a really original line, too.
But regardless, there is a legitimate question here.
Some of these women have claim to have tapes, voicemail tapes, and texts and emails and so forth.
But do how many of these women are really part of this gravy train?
You know, it's it's fascinating to watch.
You know what I I uh found out that the ProFlowers people have this Santa's workshop mini Christmas tree that they're offering this Christmas season.
I told you about it the other day.
Um and I this holiday season has jumped up on me.
I am so far behind.
I know it says Thanksgiving was late, but it has just jumped up on me, and I I am way behind.
I haven't even started decorating the house yet.
And I normally that's done right around Thanksgiving.
So I've we've been on the phone uh the last couple days.
We've been sending Pro Flowers arrangements and this Santa's workshop mini Christmas tree to a lot of people.
Because it's so easy.
And you know, flowers going around on non-flower occasions.
I mean, those that will really make they score points.
I mean, anybody can send flowers on Valentine's Day, and anybody can send flowers on a birthday, anybody can send flowers on a Mother's Day and all that, but when you're out of the blue, you get nice flowers, the best you've ever had shipped in by FedEx that lasts for a week with the some of the the greatest aroma, and now the Santa's workshop mini Christmas tree, 2499 plus delivery.
It comes in a f uh free tin, a festive tin, free colorful lights, twelve free wood ornaments for you to decorate with.
I mean it's a it's an amazing value.
If you've never used ProFlowers to send holiday gifts, this is the perfect time to try 'em.
You can't lose because the mini Christmas tree is guaranteed fresh for 14 days.
Uh go to rushproflowers.com.
That's the simplest way.
Or you call 1800 PRO Flowers and mention you heard it on Rush.
It's the old offer code Rush Business.
And it's um it's it's just easy and it's fun too.
And when you go to the website, the selection of things they have in addition now to the Santa's workshop mini-tree blow you away.
Also, this uh California lawmaker Joe Baca, Democrat, is abandoning his effort to honor Tiger Woods with the Congressional Medal of Honor.
In a statement given to the Hills ITK, that's their blog, Joe Bacchus said, in light of the recent developments surrounding Tiger and his family, I will not pursue legislation awarding Tiger the Congressional Gold Medal this session.
Hey, Joe, why don't you find out who leaked the 93-page security plan for the transportation uh safety administration and give them the medal?
Here's uh Mark in Waterbury, Connecticut.
Mark, great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Uh longtime listener, first-time caller, very nervous, so bear with me.
It it just seems to me that the uh comet denominator of all these compromises are unfunded mandates mandates.
I mean, now they're gonna say, okay, private insurance companies, yeah, we can involve them, but they gotta be nonprofit uh private insurance companies.
Well, I mean, how are they gonna stay in business if if you can't make a profit?
Well, the government, uh nonprofit uh insurance company oversee over overseen by the government, it's the government.
And they're they're also saying that the insurance companies all have to cover pre-existing conditions, so if your house burns down, then you uh can get uh house insurance and everything will be taken care of.
Or as Obama said in his speech in Colorado, the insurance companies uh will uh make it so that or the government will make it so that you can't pay people or people can't pay more than such and such out of their pocket.
I mean, it it just seems to me that the premiums are going to increase to the point of you know there will be no option but the public option.
So so all these compromises, it just seems that all roads lead to the public options.
Exactly right.
You've got it, you've nailed it, and you've did it even while you were nervous.
And And um, I mean, just as they did to the banks.
I mean, they mandated banks out of businesses by making them, you know, uh lent telling them to lend to unqualified borrowers, you know.
And so they went out of business or else they were accused of predatory lending because they couldn't pay the pay it back, you know.
Well mandates alone kill all these businesses, banking and insurance, you know.
You you you look you you're saying things here that uh the to which there is an obvious conclusion, and you probably have um arrived at it on your own, but if not, let me hip.
What you have just described is liberals' lie.
It's no more complicated than that.
Whenever any liberal politician or leader announces a plan, it's a lie.
They also, in order to move their agenda, have to have at least one demon.
Preferably several.
In this cycle, they have demonized doctors.
They have demonized pediatricians, they have demonized the insurance companies.
They demonize every entity or as many entities in the private sector as possible to convince people they're being ripped off by people in order to get people to side with government solutions to problems.
Everything is a lie.
You can go into as much detail to point it out to people as you want, but the simple way to understand these people is they lie.
You know, I could be wrong.
It's doubtful, but I could be wrong.
But I'm beginning to think that Tiger Woods may be conservative, and that some people know it.
Well, I already gave you the John Edwards analogy.
The media did everything they could what?
What?
Uh, about politically, don't give me morally concerned.
I'm talking about politically conservative.
Because look, they had to be dragged, kicking and screaming to cover the John Edwards mess.
And there was a chow in that one.
And John Edward's wife had cancer.
John's wife was doing everything she could to support his life and his candidates out there running around, and the national inquirer had it just as they had the tiger story.
But the drive-bys had nothing of any interest to the John Edwards story.
Compare the attention that the drive-bys are giving all of these alleged mistresses.
Compare that to the way they treated Jennifer Flowers and the other bimbo eruptions during the first Clinton campaign.
They made excuses for Clinton.
They did stories on how it's okay to lie.
Everybody does it.
Jennifer Flowers was ignored, and then she was mocked and then discredited, and she had tapes.
And they went out of their way to save Bill Clinton and to destroy even when the Lewinsky thing hit, they all joined forces and went out there trying to make Ken Starr out to be some sex pervert.
That was so loud.
But anyway, uh now with Tiger, all these alleged mistresses are believed, every word they say.
Imagine if the media have acted this way with John Edwards and Bill Clinton uh back in back in their day.
So maybe what I'm thinking here is that Tiger and uh and his wife just go on 60 minutes and deny that there were any affairs.
Just deny it.
It worked, it worked for Bill and Hillary, and then before the next bimbo eruption, head down to some island and dance together and make sure the picture shows up on the front page of the Los Angeles Times, so the people didn't talk about it.
And that's how the Clintons got out of this.
Now a question, a quick question on a scale of the house banking scandal to Watergate.
Where are we?
Are we in that range with what's going on here?
I'm serious.
I'm asking You to think about this.
If the House bank scandal, you remember that.
That's 1989.
We learned that members of the House could write checks for cash on money they did not have in their accounts.
In other words, it really didn't matter what their salary was.
They were able to write bad checks, get the cash for it, and spend it however they wanted, and never had to pay it back.
And then the House Post Office was close second.
You go in with a constituents check for, say, $5,000 and buy a couple of 40 cent stamps or whatever they cost then and take the change in cash.
That was the stuff was uncovered, and that was part of the uh recipe of the Democrat defeat for the first time in 40 years.
So if the House banking scandal was DEF CON two with the American electorate, and Watergate was DEF CON 1, are we in that range here?
We we have today the Mark Penn story where stimulus money was designed to create roads, bridges, schools, jobs for you and everybody else.
Six million of it went to Hillary Clinton's pollster.
Because Obama had promised her to pay off her debt.
We've had news this week of the scale of the safe school czar, and last week too.
This guy is a raging pervert who taught fisting, and if you don't know what it is, I'm not going to describe it, to grade school and uh and junior high school students.
Back in the year 2000.
We have Climate Gate, a total hoax.
We are destroying the doctor-patient relationship.
We are destroying private insurance.
We have massive tax increases on every American coming with Obamacare and Cap and Tax.
We have the government taking over car companies.
We have unemployment that's anywhere from 10 to 17%.
Generational theft has taken place here.
Hundreds of billions of dollars were allocated by Congress for express purposes of creating slush funds for Obama and the Democrats.
We have a phony swine flu virus national emergency.
Get this from yesterday, this is from uh Fox News blog.
The theoretical worst case scenarios associated with this year's H1H1 uh N1 pandemic taught us uh not to take influenza for granted.
However, a new study suggests the worst case scenario for the pig flu, maybe only slightly more deadly than a typical outbreak of seasonal flu, and in a best case scenario, much less.
Uh but it bottom line of the study is the uh swine flu uh much less severe than feared.
A companion story here from uh.
Uh let's see, there's a the medical editor of something.
Uh four in five swine flu patients did not have the disease.
Four out of five people who called the swine flu line for Tamiflu did not actually have the disease.
A bogus scandal.
A bogus pandemic.
You combine this with the UK story, we can see what's happened here.
A manufactured phony crisis.
Hoax and change.
The media loved this BS story, but you were a problem.
I was a problem, actually.
I wasn't going to get a vaccine for a phony emergency, and I I told Kathleen Sibelius to stuff it publicly on this program.
Kathleen Sabilia showing us how to sneeze on our arms so that we wouldn't destroy all human life before global warming got us.
We are the targets of lies, damn lies and science news, science, and scientists rapidly becoming as trustworthy as politicians.
So where are we here?
Mark Penn story, The Safe School Tsar, Climate Gate, Doctor-Patient Relationship Destroyed, Private Insurance on the way to being destroyed, massive tax increases on everybody taking over the car company, 17% unemployment, generational theft, slush funds, phony swine flu virus, apologizing around the world for our country that is a beacon of hope, the land of the free, the home of the brave.
Where are we?
Are we approaching genuine outrage in this country?
I don't know.
I I seem to sense that we are.
I I think some of these polls that have his approval number way up there, 46, 47, I don't think it's that high.
I Actually, don't.
Here's Steve in St. Simons, Georgia.
Great to have you on the uh EIB network.
Hello.
Hello.
Yes.
Rush.
Yeah.
I'm happy to be here.
I've been a listener since 1992.
Thank you, sir, very much.
I wanted to talk about Climate Gate.
The uh specifically the the code.
I know a little something about computer programming and statistical modeling.
And uh I wanted to comment on the uh uh you know the code that I've reviewed.
I looked at some of the stuff on the internet.
It's widely available.
And uh I know I've got a a tab here on my web browser devoted to some of it.
Somebody's gone through it line by line.
It's devastating.
Absolutely.
You know, I uh uh I mean, aside from the comments, anybody can read the comments.
And uh, you know, the programmers are writing to themselves and talking to themselves about what they're doing, and that's bad enough.
But uh, you know, I I I can actually read some of the code that they've written, and I just want to make a a point about one of the principles that that programmers why don't you tell people what you mean by code?
Because it's some people think code is the software that makes a computer program work.
Well, okay, in this case, the the code is the climate model itself.
Right.
That's exactly right.
And these models and the code is it it is an utter joke, is it not?
Well, I I'm reading through it, and you can see places where they've bound the model to the raw data itself, and that violates one of the the main rules of uh code writing and computer programming is you're supposed to have your data independent from the code or the program or the software.
The two are not supposed to be dependent.
And in this particular case, that's what's happening.
These guys in their comment section here, they're talking about how to hide the decline in temperatures, because it doesn't work.
Yes.
Their models don't work if we if they they have to hide the decline.
They're for Al Gore to run around today and say on Andrew Mitchell it's settled science and there's no dispute here, but this is just un unbelievable to me.
But go ahead.
I keep interrupting you because I'm passionate about it.
No, no, absolutely.
Go go ahead.
Um well, okay, you you look at the code and there there will be an array of numbers that just shows up in the in the code itself, in the climate model itself.
And you know, where does where do these numbers come from?
And these numbers are then used to operate on the data itself.
And you know, there are there are reasons why you might do that, but uh, you know, the the most obvious one would be if you wanted to manipulate the data.
It looks like the model won't run without these particular numbers that are hard-coded into the climate model itself.
That's what it looks to me.
So in other words, you could not reproduce the results of these models without this particular piece of code.
You couldn't do it with just the raw data.
You have to have the code itself.
So you had they had to rig it.
I'm sorry, what?
They had to rig it.
The whole thing's Oh, yeah.
Well, it it's it's just a huge violation of uh programming and statistical modeling.
I mean, if you're a programmer, you're not supposed to do that, but if you do statistical modeling, the statistics are supposed to speak for themselves.
These are political hacks masquerading as lab coat scientists.
It it's a pretty egregious transgression uh the stuff that I'm looking at.
Well, Steve, you know what?
Uh you what is your background?
You said uh you uh you you what you I have a uh I have a PhD in management information systems and I do some of my own statistical modeling for my own research.
And you know, I've been looking at this stuff that's on the internet because it's widely available.
Yeah.
And uh, you know, I I just wanted to see for myself what exactly are is going on here, you know.
So uh I I uh I appreciate that.
I I that's I find this I find something fascinating.
I've got to take a break here uh uh Now, Steve's great guy, don't want anybody to misunderstand this.
But when you talk to scientists, or in his case, a PhD about this, the people on our side of it, people who know it's a hoax, people who know it, they look at it in an entirely different way because they're scientists.
And it's fascinating to me.
I'll explain to you what I mean when we come back.
See, for me, this is very simple.
Because I know liberals.
I know how they go about achieving their aims.
I know what the purpose of their aims are, and I know that climate science, global warm, whatever it is, is just a cover for liberalism in action.
Same thing with Cap and Trade, same thing with Obama's health care and so forth.
And so from the from the first moment in 1984 that I first saw my first global warming science scientists come out, we've only got 20 years, we can't yet prove it, but we don't have time to waste, and we gotta work with man's destruction of the planet.
See, I just refuse to believe we have that power.
We do not have the power to destroy the planet.
So I'm not a scientist.
So I know, I instinctively know, it's like Shatner asked, how do you know?
How do you know?
Because I do.
Just trust me, don't doubt me.
I I know, I know, I know liberals.
But when you run into scientists who also know this is a hoax, the the ideology doesn't matter.
Like when I'm talking to Steve, and he's telling us what he found in the code, and the code does, the code produced that hockey stick graph that showed temperatures skyrocketing in the last 20 years, 50 years.
It's all bogus, and these guys who understand code can go in there and see it.
There's a piece at the American thinker that explains it, how it's bogus and how they how they how they rigged it and so forth.
But the ideology of these so-called climate scientists does not interest these guys as much as disproving it scientifically, which is great, it's wonderful.
Don't misunderstand.
I'm just thinking a lot of time and a lot of anguish and a lot of a lot of study could be prevented if you just know that liberals lie.
If you just have a basic ideological understanding of who they are and what their aims are.
And they're not good, and the intentions are not good.
The consequences are not good.
They are anti-freedom and anti-liberty.
They are pro command and control government authority.
And they have these programs which are just ruses to get everybody supporting them.
They have to lie in order to do it.
Yeah, the scientists go that a model, that's what's egregious error.
They're liars.
They went to a lot of trouble to lie really well.
Get this, six people, including a bank teller, arrested federal investigation, identity theft here in South Florida.
Federal authorities say the suspects stole identities, cash forged checks, use stolen credit cards.
They face charges of bank fraud, identity theft.
One of the suspects worked as a bank teller.
Snerdley, he does, he does some show preppers.
He brings every day, he brings a story in about identity theft he writes, life lock on the top of it.
I got a whole stack of these stories.
When I see these stories, you know, I'm telling people about life lock uh quite often.
Uh nobody's gonna stop it totally, but boy, life lock comes as close as anybody.
Why take chances with your identity, your money, your time and your reputation?
Life lock, just $10 a month, actually less than that.
When you mention my name, you're gonna save an additional 10%.
800-440-4833 for life luck.
Uh, do not want to read about any of my audience members' uh losing their identity.
Simply no excuse for that.
800 440-4833, it's life lock, and use the promo code Rush.
Yeah, in fact, this was from a uh uh deeply, deeply disappointed Washington Post uh yesterday, flu pandemic, pig flu, swine flu, may be the mildest in history.
How is that hoax and change working for you with the Second wave of pig flu infections having crested in the U.S. leading epidemiologists are predicting that the pandemic could end up ranking as the mildest since modern medicine began documenting.
And why does anybody anywhere in this country believe anything any member of this administration says from Obama on down to Kathleen Sebelius?
How many of you realize how scammed we are being every day?
▲
Export Selection