All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 10, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:19
November 10, 2009, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this show, now documented to be almost always right, 99.3% of the time.
I am Rush Limbaugh, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Great to have you here.
Telephone number 800-282-2882 and the email address, lrushbo at eibnet.com.
You know, stop and think about something, folks.
I mean, I went through a little timeline presentation of this Nadal Malik Hasun Hassan guy.
But stop and think of this.
Put at the front of the timeline, 9-11.
And let's go back to that FBI agent, Colleen Rowley, or whatever her name was, in Minneapolis.
She begged her superiors at the FBI for a search warrant to look at this guy's computer, Masawi, the 20th hijacker.
The FBI denied it.
She wakes up and she sees the towers burning and falling down and she cringes.
So we are promised, all right, we're going to, we're going to get together here now.
We're going to start connecting these dots.
This is serious stuff.
I mean, 9-11, we're going to defend America.
We're going to start connecting the dots.
Jump forward to last week.
Hell, jump forward to 2008.
The FBI, the Justice Department, have overwhelming evidence and information that a radical Muslim is in our own military, is talking to a radical Imam and is going to his mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, at the same time the 9-11 hijackers were there.
We are told that this guy then makes a slide presentation to fellow psychiatrists and doctors at Walter Reed, in which he basically indicts the United States for its treatment of and procedures against radical Islamists.
Now, if we know all of this, and I'm sure there's more that was known, if we know all of this and don't do anything about it, at some point, don't you think the FBI or the DOJ needs to be turned upside down and every bad apple in there shaken out?
If we, this is what has, you know, when I started a program yesterday, why did he do it?
Everybody running around asking, why did he do it?
The real question is, how does a radical Islamist end up in our own military and then become detected as one, be discovered as well?
How does a radical Islamist worm his way into our military and then, over two years, seen for who he is and nothing's done about it?
My friends, that is a serious question.
And it makes me wonder, what good is anything we're doing in the effort to protect and defend the country?
And then the explanation is, well, the communications didn't rise to a level of serious concern according to guidelines in the Justice Department.
Guidelines in the justice, connecting the dots.
This guy, the headline in LA Times, he was on the U.S. radar.
He wasn't on radar.
He was on stage.
He was broadcasting who he is.
He was telling everybody who he is.
He was advising his superior officers.
He was making all these militant statements.
They were afraid to turn him in because of political correctness and discrimination charges against them.
There's videotape of the guy in full imam garb at a 7-Eleven hours before he opened fire from the 7-Eleven security tape in nearby Killeen, Texas, I think.
We know he went in and bought the guns, and we knew that happened.
We couldn't do anything about that because guidelines prevented us from making a connection to things he was saying and doing to the purchase of the guns.
So, you know, we tied our hands behind our backs.
And now after it all happens, well, let's not rush to judgment on this.
That's not rush to judgement.
We've got to be very careful.
We're going to wait for the full investigation before we understand what happened.
This is just somebody who cracked.
It's the military's fault.
There's too much stress in the military.
It's all this stress.
In fact, the president, ladies and gentlemen, has just produced and exclusively has provided to us here at the EIB Network a public service announcement.
Iran's 60 seconds pre-traumatic stress disorder.
And here it is.
By the way, the drive-bys are going out of their way to protect Janet Napolitano, who is over at the United Arab Emirates, telling students there that we're doubling our efforts to protect against a backlash against Muslims in this country.
Sweetnessandlight.com archive went back and found an issue of the New Yorker July 2008 that published Obama's response to 9-11 as it was published in the September 19, 2001 edition of the Hyde Park Herald.
This is what Obama said about 9-11.
September 19, 2001.
Even as I hope for some measure of peace and comfort to the bereaved families, I must also hope that we as a nation draw some measure of wisdom from this tragedy.
Certain immediate lessons are clear, and we must act upon those lessons decisively.
We need to step up security at airports, re-examine the effectiveness of our intelligence networks, and we must be resolute in identifying the perpetrators of these heinous acts and dismantling their organizations and destruction.
Hey, a big F, Mr. President, so far.
We must also engage, however, in the more difficult task.
See, that first paragraph, just a throwaway.
That's just stating the obvious.
That's just Obama getting the obvious on the table so that nobody can say he doesn't get it.
This is the real nut graph coming up here.
We must also engage in the more difficult task of understanding the sources of such madness.
The essence of this tragedy, it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers and inability to imagine or connect with the humanity and suffering of others.
Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent is not innate, nor history tells us is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity.
It may find expression in a particular brand of violence.
It may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics.
Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair.
So they attacked us because this is, and we're to blame for all that.
See, what you have to understand in Obama's mind, we, the United States, are to blame for the poverty of the world because we've stolen all the rich resources, the ignorance of people in the world, the helplessness because of our superpower status, and therefore their despair.
It's all our fault.
We will have to make sure, despite our rage, that any U.S. military action takes into account the lives of innocent civilians abroad.
We will have to be unwavering in opposing bigotry or discrimination directed against neighbors and friends of Middle Eastern descent.
Finally, we will have to devote far more attention to the monumental task of raising the hopes and prospects of embittered children across the globe.
Children not just in the Middle East, but also in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe, and within our own shores.
Raising the hopes and the prospects.
Well, how's the hope and change in this country that he's behind working out for you?
The terrorists are getting a past, or at least nobody asked me, what are the terrorists supposed to do?
They're getting the past.
That's the whole point of this.
The terrorists got to pass.
We've got to understand them.
It's our fault.
There's poverty.
There's destitution, dissolution.
There's despair and helplessness.
And we've got to understand why.
And to understand why, we've got to understand why they hate us.
We've got to figure out what it is that wants to make them do this to us.
And of course, the central answer to that question is we're doing it.
We're behind it.
That explains all of this.
There are some sick people running the show in this country.
And it's not just at the White House, folks.
They're all over the place.
They're at the Department of Justice, obviously.
They are at the Pentagon.
They're clearly at the State Department.
It's our fault.
So I wonder now, I would ask this question.
I wonder if Nadal Malik Hassan was one of those poor people who never had a chance.
No, no, no.
Seriously, folks, I just read to you Obama's official statement about 9-11 on September 19, 2001.
It's our fault.
These people are poor, destitute, ignorant, helpless, and in a state of despair.
I know bin Laden's a billionaire.
We know all this.
Bin Laden's a billionaire.
These people are not poor.
That's the traditional explanation for people in this country.
The elites.
Oh, yes.
We must understand their poverty, their despair, their rage, their anger.
And it arises from the fact that we have spread their tentacles too far in the world.
Colonialism, imperialism, that we have raped the world and the earth of its resources.
We've stolen others' property to enrich ourselves.
That's where all this derives from.
This derives from a hatred of this country, a resentment, deep resentment of this country on the part of people at the highest positions of power in this country.
So I simply ask the question.
Since the reason people commit acts like Hassan did is because of hopelessness, helplessness, despair, ignorance, and poverty, was Hassan one of those poor people who never had a chance?
Well, obviously not.
We educated the man.
We put him in the U.S. military.
Hopelessness, despair, never had a chance.
I love this.
I love being able to turn these people's words, Obama's words, right back at them.
I just do.
By the way, folks, I've been studying the situation.
You know, I started the program today with unemployment news, the general decline of the economy.
And I have concluded, after thinking about it, that I'm probably wrong in warning you about everything out there being bad.
I think everything's fine.
I actually think everything is fine.
I think all this news about unemployment is not true.
I think all this news about people hopeless and finding a job is, I mean, I don't think any of it's true.
I'll tell you why we come back.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
We're going to go to Tucson, Arizona.
And Christine, nice to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
I'm so excited to talk to you.
Thank you.
Thanks very much.
I want to know why I don't have all my TV cable programs with split screens showing me the storm about to hit, what exactly Obama's doing, and the hospital outside where this terrorist is.
You talking about the hurricane slash tropical storm, Ida.
Yes.
Well, you know, it's an interesting question.
It is an interesting question.
And it's part of the reason I wanted to take your call is because this is why I don't think there's anything wrong out there.
I think all these unemployment numbers are just made up.
Because the media hasn't told us?
Well, because I remember back 2004, 2005, 2006, when there was no recession, the media was telling us there was, and we were on the precipice of one.
And remember when the gasoline price hit $4 a gallon, the news was just filled with sob story after sob story after sob story.
The media went out and they found all these people who were suffering economically.
And they had these people berating George Bush and these people for not caring, Bush not caring what was going on.
Unemployment was at 4.7%, an all-time record low.
And yet we got sob story after sob story after sob story on the $4 a gallon gasoline.
All these stories about we're in a recession, it's just about to start.
And they went out and they found people economically in distress, and they were all over television.
And now I don't see any of that.
No.
I don't see one sob story.
I don't see any interviews of old people having to choose between dog food and medicine during the day.
I don't see any of the stuff that we usually get when a Republican's in the White House, the economy is roaring.
No, we don't have pictures of all these people are about to be washed away.
And we even have a Messiah who could stop the storm.
Well, but the Messiah's down there grieving with the stricken families at Fort Hood.
Well, and I remember when Bush was running for election, when Clinton was in office, because I have a small company and I pay the gas bill, and gas went from like 80 cents to $1.50, and they didn't say a word because it was six months before the election.
And no one said a word about it.
There was no stories about what's happening.
Same here.
Same here.
If you are a steady consumer of the traditional media, the establishment media, you would not know that there's hardly anything wrong in the country.
Everything is hunky-dory and wonderful.
I mean, we're on the verge of getting health care.
We're going to ensure all the uninsured.
Obama is loved and adored by people all over the world.
The United States image is changing all over the world.
I mean, you'd have no idea that things are in the...
It frustrates me tremendously because during Bush, we had the strongest economy in the history of the world.
We were doing so well, stock market at $1,400.
I'm an employer, and I mean, unemployment went so low, we couldn't find people to work for us.
We had to pay them.
We had to pay somebody $10 an hour just to show up.
Yeah.
Another $5 an hour if you want them to do anything.
Another $5 an hour if you want them to actually do anything after they showed up.
Oh, yeah, here in Tucson just to show up every Monday.
I remember they split the screen.
They showed the storm hitting.
And Bush had to give up.
There was some kind of Republican convention or fundraiser that he had to give up to go stand by the ready in case this storm hit.
It was the one after Katrina.
Never mind.
Well, even Katrina, I mean, that was another glittering example of blaming Bush and showing the misery of people And showing how government under Republicans is unresponsive and doesn't work because Republicans really don't care about people, Christine.
See, that's the dirty little secret.
They were actually, there were stories where you had black leaders actually suggesting that Bush was happy this had happened because it was busting up an electoral majority for Democrats in New Orleans.
He didn't care if black people died.
I mean, that was routine.
That was routine on the news.
Now there's nothing.
There's nothing wrong.
I'm not seeing one negative story.
I haven't seen one sob story of one person.
Now, 7,500 truckers have lost their jobs this year.
Or maybe it's a smaller period than that.
We have who's laying off?
Pfizer is abandoned.
Oh, get this.
You remember the Kilo decision in New London, Connecticut?
The private homes taken away from Suzette Kilo and her neighbors, eminent domain.
They were going to give the site to a developer to develop it commercially for the tax revenue to New London, Connecticut.
Well, guess what?
The private homes of those people, which were taken, have been torn down.
The former site is a wasteland and field of weeds.
And Pfizer, the drug company whose neighboring research facility had been the original cause of the home seizure, they were going to be the anchor in this commercial development there.
Just announced they're closing up shop in New London.
They're getting out of New London.
They're not moving to Kilo.
They're getting out of the town entirely.
And they are going to either lay off or transfer 1,400 people.
So that was all for nothing.
People lost their homes taken away from them by the U.S. Supreme Court.
And now the reason for it is leaving town.
And there's another sprint.
Wireless provider slashing up to 2,500 jobs.
And that's not the first round of layoffs.
They got to cut their labor costs by $350 million on a yearly basis as part of a widespread restructuring plan.
They are the third largest wireless provider in the country.
Most of the positions will be eliminated by the end of this year.
Think Christmas.
The job cuts will affect all levels of the country, a company across all geographic locations.
Pfizer to eliminate 600 St. Louis jobs in addition to getting out of New London, Connecticut.
And I haven't seen one story in any drive-by or state-controlled media source about one person who has lost their job this year and what their life is like now.
So it must not be true that this is happening.
Hey, we're back, El Rushboat, serving humanity.
Great to have you here on the Excellence and Broadcasting Network.
And tonight, by the way, at 9 o'clock, the D.C. sniper, another terrorist, John Allen Muhammad, will be executed.
Now, anytime there's an execution in Texas, which is a deeply conservative Republican state, the drive-bys are down there with vigils and all of the anti-death penalty people show up and it's just horrible and they put pressure on the governor.
They put pressure on the Supreme Court.
How can this government kill people?
This is unreal.
Never mentioning abortion, of course, or the upcoming health care bill.
But now John Allen Muhammad is going to be plopped off in Virginia and not a word.
Not a word.
No drive-bys are in Virginia decrying the death penalty.
No drive-bys.
No anti-death penalty advocates are being shown on television.
They might make a show of it later tonight when they need ratings at nighttime, if they can squeeze it in with all of the video from Obama at Fort Hood today.
Back to Obama now in his interview with the World News Tonight last night with Jake Tapper.
Now, this next question and answer, this is just unreal, and it's highly offensive to me.
Jake Tapper says, You are about to make a final decision about the new strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
What variables play into your decision-making that would cause you to not just take General McChrystal's recommendation and implement it?
These are not only enormous burdens that we're placing on our young men and women, and that's the thing I think most about, it's also expensive.
For every thousand troops we send, that's costing us a billion dollars.
If you send 40,000 troops, you're looking at maybe $50 billion per year above and beyond the cost that we're already spending.
Suddenly, Obama is worried about money.
He's worried about $50 measly billion dollars to win a war after $750 billion in TARP money after a $1 trillion stimulus bill that's bombing out on top of $1.2 to $2 trillion for his health care plan.
And he says it's expensive to send more troops over there.
It's a billion dollars for every thousand troops.
And that's expensive.
All of a sudden, this guy's worried about the expense of something.
Let me tell you what this means.
They get all this stuff, health care, another stimulus, all this stuff.
We're going to be in such debt that the pressure is going to be made to cut the budget.
Now, you can't cut entitlement spending because that's mandated spending.
Some might even say that's unconstitutional.
And this health care bill is going to be mandated spending.
They can't cut it, regardless of the budget circumstances, regardless that you can't cut it.
You watch, these guys are going to go for the military budget and they're going to slash it.
And we see it in the lack of concern in Afghanistan, the lack of concern in Iraq, the lack of concern over Major Hassan.
These guys that run this country are going to pare the military down to a bare minimum size they think we can get away with, which will be too small.
Let's skip, no, let's go ahead and do number eight.
Next question from Jake Tapper.
Here's a question a lot of Senate Democrats want to know.
When you gave your joint address to Congress, you said that under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions.
Now, this amendment passed Saturday night, which not only prohibits abortion coverage in the public option, but also prohibits women who receive subsidies from taking out plans that provide abortion coverage.
Does that meet the promise you set out or does it overreach?
Does it go too far?
This is a health care bill, not an abortion bill.
And we're not looking to change what is a core principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize tape.
They are going to be used to subsidize abortions.
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, as much as admitted it yesterday on television.
Louise Slaughter and a couple of others have sent letters to Pelosi.
Folks, you and I all know the Stupak Amendment language is coming out of there.
Federal funds will be used for abortion or it will not pass the House.
So once again, a huge disconnect from the truth from President Obama.
Here's the rest of the soundbites.
And I want to make sure that the provision that emerges meets that test, that we are not in some way sneaking in funding for abortions, but on the other hand, that we're not restricting women's insurance choices.
There needs to be some more work before we get to the point where we're not changing the status quo, and that's the goal.
Gibberish, pure gibberish.
Abortion funding will be in the final bill.
Otherwise, it has no chance of getting Democrat votes.
It's just that simple.
He can say what he wants.
Now, there was a report yesterday that in the Pelosi bill, if you don't buy mandated insurance, you can face a fine of up to 2.5% of your income and $250,000 fine and five years in jail.
Jake Tapper says, do you think it's appropriate to have a threat of jail time for those who refuse to buy insurance?
What I think is appropriate is that in the same way that everybody has to get auto insurance, and if you don't, you're subject to some penalty.
That people who are paying for their health insurance aren't subsidizing folks who simply choose not to until they get sick and then suddenly they expect free health insurance.
That's a basic concept of responsibility that I think most Americans abide by.
Yeah, well, this comparison to automobile insurance is ridiculous.
You buy auto insurance to protect yourself against damage you do to somebody else.
Health insurance is an entirely different concept.
They continue to make this comparison.
But then Tapper said, but as the Senate puts its final bill together and as a House and Senate prepare to vote on after the conference committee, they should know, does the president think jail time is appropriate?
Well, I'm not sure that's the biggest question they're asking right now.
So I think I put out the principle that penalties are appropriate for people who try to free ride the system and force others to pay for their health insurance.
So he won't deny it.
He just, that's not the question.
Jail time, that's not a big issue.
It's not.
It's about basic freedom.
There are many constitutional authorities who say it is not constitutional for the federal government to mandate anybody by anything.
Here's Redmond in Miami, Florida.
Redmond, thank you for waiting.
I appreciate your patience.
Hello.
Rush, it's a great honor.
Thank you, sir.
We operate on a four-month-old baby today, and I want you to know that every member of my OR team is not a member of the AMA.
Yeah, the AMA has come out for the health care bill again, but they've got some minor objections.
If it cuts, doctors pay too much, they won't be.
What do you think it's going to do?
I'll tell you what, the CBO has not calculated the cost of demonizing and demoralizing every doctor in the United States.
And I've talked to people.
I've said, what do you think is going to happen to physician productivity if Obamacare passes?
And I've asked my liberal friends who voted for Obama.
They said, oh, it'll go down 50 to 70 percent.
So that means longer waiting times, fewer patients getting seen, fewer procedures getting done, and nobody gets this.
And nobody's even thinking about it, Rush.
Well, the CBO and the government never does score things what I call dynamically.
They'll take a tax cut or a tax increase.
They'll run the numbers.
They do not factor in the dynamic changes that result.
Just like you mentioned, they're not factoring in the loss of morale, the loss of motivation.
Loss of productivity.
Rush, the things that are rewarded get done.
That's the basic management principle.
So what do you think they're thinking to require that you maintain your productivity?
Well, you know, they'll have a list.
You know, here's how many patients you have to see.
And I don't think patients want to be seen that way.
I think patients want to be seen because that doctor is highly motivated to see them, figure out what's wrong with them, and cure them.
That's what I do.
That's what drives me every day.
I work nights.
I work holidays.
I work weekends.
And so does every other physician I know.
See, and that's what they're counting.
They're counting on the fact that you all in the medical profession take as your primary motivation healing, saving, curing, as you say, and that that will override everything.
They're figuring the economics will not really affect you.
Yeah, so in the meantime, so they're assuming that we're going to continue to work relentlessly, because that's how we got to be heart surgeons.
We worked relentlessly.
I can't even tell you 16 years of training every other night in the hospital, self-abnegation, away from family, away from friends, working for less than what I'd get paid at McDonald's because I had a dream and I was going to make it happen.
And now they let loose lawyer dogs on us and they're going to cut back and they're going to make us nine to fivers.
They're going to have us punch a clock, give us the salary that Obama's salaries are, thinks is appropriate.
Right.
And they're going to gut us.
And I don't think you can calculate the loss of productivity, the loss of morale.
And ultimately, the loss of excellence.
Well, America.
Well, when you're talking about the loss of productivity, you're talking about the loss of care.
And that will, of course, then subtract and detract from the excellence in American medicine that does exist.
It's horrible.
All of this is just horrible.
And when you stop and think, doctor, this is all being done for one reason, and that is to create in perpetuity the Democrat Party in power by creating as many Americans as possible dependent on the government and some form of subsidy or check for their existence.
That's what this is about.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Doing something special this afternoon at 3 o'clock Pacific time, 6 o'clock Eastern.
My 25th anniversary on KFBK Sacramento, which was the radio station, is the radio station that launched all of this, was October 15th.
I think that's the day.
But this afternoon, 3 o'clock Eastern, I'm going to do an hour on KFBK with Tom Sullivan and Kitty O'Neill, who were both there when I was there.
Kitty's still there.
Tom is in New York working for the Fox Business Channel.
And they got a couple surprise guests, I'm told.
They sent me the format and the clock for the hour, which I didn't need the clock.
I'm the guest.
But they still sent me the format clock for the hour.
And I was 25 years on one radio station.
I mean, that's so unusual in this business.
25 years in one job is unusual.
That's a quarter of a century.
And I got out there in 1984, so I was 33 when I got out there.
I'm 58 now.
And I still feel like I was there three and a half years.
And those three and a half years in Sacramento were, they still feel like where my real home was.
That's why I called it my adopted hometown because that's the first place that I ever, ever adopted a, discovered, found out what a success track was.
You know, I'd been fired or just muddled along in average mediocrity prior to getting out.
But that was also the first place where I was allowed to do a radio show the way I thought it should be done.
So there are a lot of people out there to whom I own a owe a debt of gratitude.
And when I, this is the point, I, all I asked when I got out there was that it be my program done my way.
And if I had, if it failed, I would be the one to blame.
And if it worked out like it has, then I could proudly take responsibility for it.
didn't want guests.
Every talk show in the world had guests.
I couldn't get any different guests anybody else got.
I didn't care what the guests thought.
I wanted people to know what I thought.
The guests do not care about my success.
They care about the platform to promote whatever it is their platform is or whatever opinion they're having.
Nothing against guests, but it was just a formatic staple.
And I didn't, you know, I'd worked in music radio where the music was always given credit if the station did well or the promotion of contests, the giveaways.
And I said, this was my last shot at it.
You know, I've been fired eight or nine times, seven or eight times.
And I said, I want to find out once and for all if I can be the reason people will listen to the radio.
And they told me one thing out there that I have never forgotten.
So I was replacing Morton Downey Jr., who had been fired for telling an ethnic joke and then refusing to apologize for it.
It was an ethnic joke about a member of the city council out there who was of Asian descent.
And he refused to apologize.
And they brought me in there and they said, look, we want controversy.
I mean, we don't shy away from it at all.
But if you're going to make it up, if you're going to say things you don't believe just to get people all worked up, we're not going to back you up on that.
You had to be who you are.
And I've never forgotten that because there's so many people that just say whatever they think is outrageous just to draw attention.
And I'm sure a lot of you have seen all of this happen in your own life too.
You've been working and you've wanted to find the one place where it was all up to you, success or failure, all up to you.
And I realized out there that if I was ultimately going to succeed, I had to get myself actively involved in the revenue stream of the radio station.
I had to be able to put my hand, my finger on X number of dollars I was generating.
Now, that would buy me insurance against the occasional rating fall, you know, rating books or the vagaries of these things back then were crazy.
It could go up or down, and it was dependent on diary placement and the market, a number of other things.
But if you had that kind of ratings insurance, you had your hand on a certain amount of the revenue stream, then it was, it was, that was such a learning experience out there.
And, you know, this is, it's, it has stayed with me throughout my entire career.
And I really owe these people in Sacramento a huge debt of gratitude for what?
It's 6 o'clock Eastern, 3 o'clock Pacific.
But it's on KFBK, which is AM 1530 in Sacramento.
Well, yeah, it'll be on a week.
We're going to put it on a website.
Oh, yeah, we'll link to it.
It's audio only.
I don't think I'm going to use the camera.
We're not using a camera.
We're not going to use the camera.
So we'll just, it'll be audio only.
We'll either get it up tonight or sometime tomorrow, yeah.
But we're not going to put it up live.
This is another thing.
Rush, right?
Because we don't want to cannibalize KFPK.
You know, they're the affiliate.
Why don't you own satellite radio?
Because, you know, these radio stations are who got me where I am.
I'm not going to cannibalize them by making the show available elsewhere, other than our website, the podcasts that we do after the fact to account for the need for portability that people have now to be able to listen to whatever they want to listen to whenever they want to listen to it.
Say, for all of you out there who play golf, warning, we are the next targets as massive polluters.
Some environmental group has calculated that it takes a golf ball 100 years to 1,000 years to break down and degrade into nothing.
And it's called America's Signature Litter.
And they want to get biodegradable golf balls.
Man, I have the story coming up.
▲
Export Selection