All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 3, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:52
November 3, 2009, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Look at this.
Look at this.
The White House says the detainees at Club Gitmo, where Rush Limbaugh is a thriving licensed merchandise business, are not receiving vaccinations against the swine flu.
Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary, said the concern that terrorists at the U.S. Naval Base were receiving vaccines was misplaced.
It says no vaccines are at the naval base and none are on the way.
Well, now, wait a minute.
State-controlled media told us that they were.
A bunch of you-know-what must have hit the fan when that news hit, folks.
Breetings and welcome back.
It's El Rushbaugh.
This is the EIB Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Reverend Wright is back.
Reverend Wright is back.
Audio soundbites coming up in mere moments.
Ladies and gentlemen, I got an email during the break here.
And Snerdley even said, you know, you need to go through this big tent thing again because nobody, nobody looks at things that way.
Nobody analyzes things that way.
And you're going to ran through that pretty quickly.
Here it is, basically.
I'm tired of all this talk.
We hear it all day today from select members of state-controlled media on TV.
Republican big tent.
What happened to the big tent?
They said, now that we're nominated a conservative and a conservative may win in New York 23, the media and the Democrats are wringing their hands.
Oh, no, what happened to the big tent?
As though they want us to be a big, thriving party.
What happened to the big tent?
We're so sad that Republicans are losing moderates and independents.
Yet, they say Republican registration.
Identification in polls is an all-time low.
If Republicans win today, if that's true, then we got to be attracting somebody besides Republicans, do we not?
This big tent business here, folks.
The big tent concept was not created by us.
The big tent concept, again created by Washington establishment elites on the left.
Now, you also have in Washington establishment elites that are Republican.
And the common denominator there is elites.
And they are the smartest, dumb people in the country.
They have an arrogance and a conceit about them, whether they're liberals or conservatives, Republicans.
They have an arrogance and a conceit about them that is insufferable.
And it blinds them to reality.
But the Republican elites desperately want to be respected and liked and allowed into the elite club, capital E, capital C, by the liberal Democrat elites, both in the media, politics, and academia.
And so they do this by accepting every premise that the liberal elites put forward.
And that is, you're never going to win with all those pro-life hicks down in the South in your party.
I mean, for crying out loud, it's bad enough.
You got to show up at your convention with these hayseeds arriving with gun racks in the back of the pickup truck.
And then you got to put up with the Pat Roberts's and Jerry Falwells and the all-God crowd.
Why, you guys, you're never going to win.
And your wives are never going to stop nagging you unless you fix this abortion issue.
And the Republican elites stroke their chins.
Hmm.
I think they may have a point.
Yes, we certainly don't have much in common at all with these unsophisticated hicks and rubes that live down there.
They really do have a point.
And then the liberal elites say, you know, you guys are going to have to expand your party.
You're going to have to, you're too narrow.
You're just all conservatives.
Those people, you know, they're Neanderthals.
You're going to have to go out there and get people like us in your party.
You're going to have to go out and get intelligent moderates.
You know, people that are not rock-ribbed ideological.
And the Republican elites go, that sounds exceedingly wise and intelligent.
Yes, and especially since this is what the people we wish to be accepted by think, then we'll think too.
These people, we want to get along.
We want to be considered a part of the elite club.
And if that's what they think, then we'll think it too.
So, Bamo, you get the recipe that Democrats tell these gullible elite Republicans.
Here's what you need to do to start winning elections.
And the stupid elite Republicans, oh, yeah.
And they buy into it, hook, line, and sinker, when in fact it's a recipe for eternal Democrat victory and eternal Republican defeat.
So the big tent concept was born.
And the big tent concept was articulated in such a way that we want to attract people from across the island.
We are willing to walk across the aisle to deal with these people, to meet them halfway, to show them that we don't blame them.
Show them that we're good people.
Show them that we're worthy of being loved and liked by the liberal elites who run Washington and who run New York.
So the big tent concept is born, and this attracts the very people, supposedly, that we are supposed to get in order to win.
And then these people, they are Republicans, happy in their big tent party.
And I would contend to you that the tent is empty.
There's nobody in the tent right now, and there's a vacuum being filled by conservatives and independents who were filling that vacuum with the candidacy of Doug Hoffman in New York 23, Creed Deeds and the McDonnell race in Virginia, and of course, what's going on in New Jersey.
Let me give you some names.
I mean, we were supposed to build the big tent to attract the very people who have left it.
Colin Powell has left the big tent.
Christopher Buckley left the big tent.
And they didn't just leave, they endorsed Obama.
And on their way out of the tent, they lobbed some hand grenades at the people still in the tent for forcing them out.
Chuck Hagel left the big Republican tent.
McCain left the big Republican tent.
Lindsey Gramnesty, he left.
I mean, he calls himself a Republican, but I mean, he's making deals with Democrats.
He's doing exactly what we're supposed to do to win elections, right?
Arlen Specter.
Arlen Specter left the big tent.
George W. Bush left the big tent on a couple of occasions.
Peggy Noonan left the big tent.
I mean, the very people that the big tent was designed to accommodate and attract.
The big tent has nobody in it.
Newt left the big tent.
Joe Lieberman left the big tent.
And a lot of conservatives left the big tent too, because there was a big tent, but there's a tent.
There was no foundation.
There were no principles.
There was nothing identifying about this other than it had a bunch of disparate people in there who were more concerned about being liked and being thought of as smart rather than being guided by any principles.
So there's no one inside the tent.
What good is a tent if no one's in it?
And this tent was built on the advice of Democrats, and the Democrats achieved exactly what they wanted.
Nobody in it.
Republican Party identification at an all-time low.
Conservative identification at a high, 40%, 20% liberal identification, 36% independent.
So, as you know, there's a vacuum in there and vacuums get filled up.
And the people filling the vacuum are conservatives and independents.
And this party is now undergoing the first stages of being rebuilt from within.
And these people who have left the tent, they're going to want back in at some point when the party gets rebuilt.
And they're going to do the same thing that they did that caused them to leave it.
They're going to start running in and say, well, this party's okay, but it's too strong conservative.
And the whole cycle will repeat.
Well, I don't know why it is that we should build a party on people who are going to leave the tent and not just leave the tent, but they're going to go join the other tent.
What is the big tent state is New York?
How are they doing?
New York's a big tent run.
We got every kind of Republican you can imagine in New York.
From Didi Scuzzafava to Rabbi Nate Siegel.
And how's that Republican Party working out?
How's that big tent working out for New York?
What's happening in New York?
What's getting all the fire and brimstone going in New York?
Why?
A conservative candidate.
So that, ladies and gentlemen, is what's happening.
Got a couple phone calls after the break, and the red front write.
We'll be right back.
Do not go away.
Yeah, it's already happening.
I'm watching F. Chuck Todd on PMS NBC and their graphic GOP ideology fight.
That's what this day is about.
Exactly.
I gave you the rundown.
I gave you the on-the-spot money prediction of how the media is going to spin this in the first hour of the program.
I can't go back and repeat it.
Go to rushlimbaugh.com this afternoon.
We update the site and print it out and give it to as many people as you can.
Email it around because it's exactly what's going to happen.
They got Tom Davis, a rhino, moderate Republican from Virginia who's no longer in Congress, and he's discussing the premise, yeah, it's bad news out there for Republicans.
Oh, there's ideology.
Davis, one of these guys that thinks I'm the big problem.
Gibbs, the White House press secretary, this is from The Hill and their blog.
Gibbs downplays Election Day expectations.
Whoa, I wonder what their polling data is telling them.
Or this could be a double fake out.
You never know with this much.
Anyway, Tuesday's three big races are in no way a referendum on the president, said Robert Gibbs.
No, no, no, no.
Gibbs says it's inaccurate, inappropriate to draw any great insight about what's going to happen in a year from these gubernatorial races in New York 23.
Oh, we just sent Biden up there, you know, get him out of town.
You know, we sent Obama into New Jersey for Corzine because he secretly had a date with Michelle in downtown Newark.
We know, we're not, we're not, we didn't, we're just being loyal.
We're just amid the possibility that Democrats could lose all three races on Tuesday.
Pundits are questioning whether it is in any way undermining the president's political agenda or worse, if these losses are in any way the president's fault.
Gibbs said the president's involvement in any of those contests does not signify White House has an immense political stake in these races.
Of course not.
While the press secretary stressed the president supports all the Democrat candidates running today, he cautioned reporters not to surmise from the results anything about the president's record or goals, the party's chances and subsequent big, oh, Obama's got nothing to do about it.
He just made a couple of little lame phone calls.
See what we did to Creeds.
I mean, Creedez couldn't stand up if it weren't for Obama.
He didn't ask us to come in and help him stand up, so we threw him under the boat.
What do you mean about us?
It isn't about us.
All right, to the phones, we go.
Bill, in Riverton, Illinois.
I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the program, sir.
Yes.
Hello, Rush.
Thank you for taking my call.
I was calling today.
This guy's got an amazing set of pipes.
Yeah, thank you.
I was calling today in reference to the swine flu shots.
We've been promised those for a year now, that they'd have them for us.
We still don't have them all that we need, and I'm one of those that haven't.
I haven't even been able to get my regular flu shot.
They've been out of that vaccine here in central Illinois.
But yet, people like Nancy Pelosi and Obama, they want us to believe that the government health program is going to take care of our operations, our pills, or doctors, and supply all that.
And they can't even, with a year's notice, get us the flu shots.
Yeah, I've been studying this myself.
In fact, I'm prepared for your quo.
I really admire your pipes.
Well, I'm available.
Go to work.
Now, look, you're probably wondering why there's no outrage about this.
Yes, sir.
And it's because there's a Democrat in the White House.
If this were George W. Bush and this vaccine shortage were happening, it'd be all you'd be hearing about.
But they got to protect the little man child.
They got to protect Barry.
They have to protect him from this.
There's a great story in the New York Post today about this bill from Robert Goldberg.
It's a column.
He's vice president of the Center for Medicine in the Public Interest.
The shortage of vaccine results not from drug company greed.
Wow, I thought everything was the result of big corporate greed.
No, the shortage of vaccine does not result from drug company greed or outsized demand, but almost entirely from the government's decision to pander to unfounded and unscientific fear.
As the Wall Street Journal reported last week, the U.S. government set out to have the H1N1 vaccine produced largely in single-dose syringes, a demand that has set back production considerably because multi-dose vials are far easier to make.
So once again, your instincts are right, Bill.
Once again, we see what happens when government makes business decisions.
And then they blame the manufacturer for not having high enough yields of the vaccine.
They no doubt changed the demands after the manufacturer said they could do what they wanted and so forth.
So, you know, it's the only reason to seek single-dose production was to please people needlessly worried about the preservative thimerathol, which is used to provide multiple doses of the vaccine.
The fear, utterly groundless and repeatedly debunked, is that thimirosol can cause autism and other neurological disorders in infants and other young children.
If not for that decision, we'd have more than enough vaccine.
Instead, because the government yielded to pressure from anti-vaccine fringe groups, which it must be noted do not include me, we're behind the curve on protecting millions of children from swine flu.
So this guy, Goldberg, is blaming the anti-vaccine fringe.
I don't know that I would do that, but I think he's right.
This autism theory has been debunked.
But the problem, the bottom line here, the bottom line, folks, is that this was a hysteria that Obama created.
The media hyped, and they failed to meet their own expectations.
This ought to be their Katrina.
This ought to be Obama's Katrina.
This is no different than FEMA supposedly screwing up and not getting down there in time to New Orleans.
But they have to protect the little man child.
And so, yeah, they'll spread the hysteria, and then they'll make it look like the drug companies are evil and don't care about people and want them to die.
Here's Matt in Lake Charles, Louisiana.
Welcome, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hey, Rush, greetings from a fellow radio broadcaster.
Thank you, sir.
I was reading this story on Politico, and it just blew my mind.
And you've talked about this so many times.
You predicted there wouldn't be a post-racial society after Obama.
And so the headline is, racial disparity.
All active ethics probes focus on black lawmakers.
And so basically, what the Congressional Black Caucus is saying is that there's this big conspiracy to only target black members of Congress for these ethics investigations.
And I'm like, wait a minute, aren't they the ones committing these violations?
Shouldn't they be investigated?
It's like, what do we have racial quotas now for ethics violations?
Well, we do.
See, you have to understand these people are perpetual minority.
And as Dr. Hutchison wrote in his hot column about me, this is a perfect illustration of the minority thought pattern, which is the white guy has made me a perpetual victim.
And the minority thought pattern, and Dr. Hutchison developed that theory, and he's black.
He's African-American.
And it perfectly fits what's happening here.
Let me give you the details of the story.
Hang on here, Matt.
The House Ethics Committee currently investigating seven African-American lawmakers, more than 15% of the total in the House, and an eighth black member, Representative Jesse Jackson Jr., would be under investigation if the Justice Department hadn't asked the committee to stand down.
Not a single white lawmaker is currently the subject of a full-scale ethics committee probe.
Is there concern whether someone's trying to set up Congressional Black Caucus members?
Yeah, there is, said a black House Democrat.
It looks as if there is somebody out there who understands what the rules are and sends names to the ethics committee with the goal of going after the CBC.
Now, who would be doing this?
Can the Republicans start any kind of Democrats doing this?
I mean, they control the committee.
They control the committee and they control.
The ethics committee supposedly is independent.
But, you know, I would love, you know, since I run the Republican Party, I would love to say, hey, gang, I'm doing this.
I'm behind this because I'm trying to show the NFL how fair I can be.
But I really can't make that claim.
But it is interesting that the only people being investigated are African American.
When I know full well, I mean, you can throw Barney Frank in there.
I mean, all kinds of people could be investigated.
John Murthy, John Murthy, with his airport thing there in his district in Pennsylvania.
So anyway, what was the point that you wanted to make about it?
No, you know, I just, you know, you've made the point so many times that, you know, we weren't going to be headed for a post-racial America after Obama.
And, you know, it just struck me.
It's like they perpetually think that somebody is after them.
And I'm sitting here thinking, they're the ones in control right now.
They act like they're not a, they still act like the Republicans are in control.
They want to blame Republicans and conservatives for everything.
That's the minority thought pattern.
Yeah, perpetual victimhood stat, perpetual minority status.
Because you see, having that attitude allows you to be racist without being racist because it is said you don't have the power to implement or act out your racism, so you really aren't racist.
That's one of the brilliant theories of the Reverend Doc.
But you're right.
The big deal is here, wait a minute.
We're entitled to these ethics violations.
We're a minority.
We're entitled to these.
We got it.
We're just trying to get what's rightfully ours.
It was denied us for so many years and so long.
We're entitled to this.
And why are they only looking at us?
If I were these guys in a black caucus upset about this, you know they've got the goods on some other guys.
I mean, let's start naming names here.
Let's get the circular firing squad going.
That's what I want to see.
And you are listening to Rush Limbaugh, one of the most well-known Anglo-Americans in the country today.
Behind the golden EIB microphone, 800-282-2882, an African-American has emerged, re-emerged, shall we say.
The public spotlight, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
September 17th of this year, he was in New York City, the 60th anniversary, celebration of Monthly Review Magazine, a big, I mean, this thing is far, far, far-left magazine, monthly review.
Now, remember, this was Reverend Obama, President Obama's reverend for 20 years.
And in those 20 years, President Obama never heard a word Reverend Wright said.
Not a word.
Jeremiah Wright was the featured speaker at the 60th anniversary celebrationist liberal magazine.
Here's a portion of his remarks.
From the victims of neocolonialism to the victims of the chameleon nature of racism and from the Cold War in the days of its infancy to the needless wars of Vietnam in its second decade through wars of greed in Afghanistan and Iraq in its sixth decade.
This magazine unflinchingly has tackled the tough issues from McCarthyism to militarism, from the Chinese Revolution through the Ghanaian Revolution to the Cuban Revolution, from the lies told by United States presidents to the lies told by the United States media.
I think Obama heard every word Reverend Wright said in those sermons.
I think Reverend Wright is President Obama.
Do you hear that, Mr. Matthews?
I'll say a little louder.
Reverend Wright is President Obama.
And now he thanks these people for their socialist and Marxist perspective.
Thank you for fulfilling the invaluable purpose that you had in mind to offer a forum for commentary and analysis from a specifically socialist perspective.
You dispel all the negative images we have been programmed to conjure up with just the mention of that word socialism or Marxism.
You have championed the interests of those who are the victims of Martin Luther King's famous menage troi, militarism, capitalism, and racism.
Reverend Wright is President Obama.
President Obama is Reverend Wright.
I'm sorry, you don't hang around people like this for 20 years and not be influenced by them.
You don't hang around by the people, the people he hung around and not be influenced by them.
President Obama is Reverend Wright, and it didn't stop there.
War martization of the world proceeds from the premise of profit.
Is it oppression masquerading as democracy and globalization?
Is it militarism dressed up in a costume calling itself peace, making the world safe for capitalism, the profit of the few, or making the world livable for all, the level playing field for all?
My work with liberation theology, with Latin American theologians, with the Black Theology Project, and with the Cuban Council of Churches taught me 30 years ago the importance of Marx and a Marxist analysis of the social realities of the vulnerable and the oppressed who were trying desperately to break free of the political economies undergirded by this country that were choking them and cutting off any hope of a possible future where all of the people would benefit.
President Obama is Reverend Jeremiah Wright.
They're indistinguishable.
Black theology, black liberation theology teaches hatred of the United States of America.
Obama's out apologizing for it.
Look at this.
My work with liberation theology, Latin American theologians with the Black Theology Project, with the Cuban Council of Churches, taught me 30 years ago the importance of Marx and the Marxist analysis of the social realities of the vulnerable and the oppressed.
He might as well have said, I'm going to return the nation's wealth to its quote-unquote rightful owners.
Reverend Wright is President Obama and vice versa.
Well, let me check the transcript of it, Mr. Sterling.
I don't think we've got Reverend Wright praising Chairman Mao, but there are enough people in Obama's administration doing that.
He's praising Castro and Marx.
I mean, can Chairman Mao be far from his conscious mind?
No.
He wasn't through, ladies and gentlemen.
If I help a homeless child, they'll call me a saint.
If I ask why are they homeless, they'll call me a socialist.
That's what Martin Luther King said he was.
I would be proud to be called a socialist because I want to know why in this country there are homeless.
When people are the priority, it causes us to see the law from a different perspective.
It was only when I was introduced, Attorney Tiger, to the brilliant mind of appellate court judge Alian Higginbottom that I began to understand the problematic between the law and how poor people and people of color are seen in this land of the greed and home of the brave.
Excuse me, land of the greed and home of the slave.
Land of the greed and home of the slave.
President Obama is Jeremiah Wright.
Jeremiah Wright is President Obama.
Happy to be called a socialist.
Look at this.
I've heard Obama say similar words in interviews, talking about the court not going far enough in distribution when Reverend Wright here said the problematic between the law and how poor people and people of color are seen in this land of the greed and home of the brave.
Excuse me, land of the greed and home of the slave.
I don't know who the slaves are.
Well, the slaves are as many people of color that Reverend Wright can convince they are slaves.
You've got guys like this preaching all over this country telling black people that slavery still lives around.
This is what black liberation theology is all about.
He's not letting go of the past.
Well, you would know better than I, liberation from what?
But I'm just, my point is, I make the mistake of assuming, I live it.
We live in a colorblind society, and I assume that that's what everybody wants when they say they want a colorblind society.
I don't believe Reverend Wright wants a colorblind society.
I don't believe President Obama wants a colorblind society.
I don't believe they want a post-racial society whatsoever.
They're carrying around too many grievances here.
And now, when I listen to this man, I understand why to this day there's still so much anger.
It's because it's being stoked.
It's being fueled from pulpits.
Yeah, I'll play the Marx one more time.
This is audio soundbite number.
Nope.
It's audio soundbite.
I'm scanning for the word Marx, looking for.
Yeah, it's number four.
Here, hit it again.
If I help a homeless child, they'll call me a saint.
If I ask why are they homeless, they'll call me a socialist.
That's what Martin Luther King said he was.
I would be proud to be called.
Wait a minute, wait a minute.
Stop it.
It's on another page.
Play number three.
Number three is the Marxist business.
Sounds like number three is the Marxist business.
All marketization of the world proceeds from the premise of profit.
Is it oppression masquerading as democracy and globalization?
Is it militarism dressed up in a costume calling itself peace, making the world safe for capitalism, the profit of the few, or making the world livable for all, the level playing field for all?
My work with liberation theology, with Latin American theologians, with the Black Theology Project, and with the Cuban Council of Churches taught me 30 years ago the importance of Marx and a Marxist analysis of the social realities of the vulnerable and the oppressed who were trying desperately to break free of the political economies undergirded by this country that were choking them and cutting off any hope of a possible future where all of the people would benefit.
Reverend Jeremiah Wright, this is from September of this year at a magazine's 60th anniversary celebration.
He was the featured speaker.
And here is finally Reverend Wright on slavery and the Constitution.
For 150 years, racism was built into the legal fabric of this country, such that by 1787, when you get the Constitution of the United States, the legal document which makes this country the foundation legally of the country, you have racism built into the Constitution.
Africans are defined as property, not people.
Women are denied the vote, not seen as equal persons under the law.
Indians are not important, and property rights trump human rights.
What else would you expect after 150 years of racist legal precedent?
If, however, if we saw Africans and Asians, women and same gender-loving persons, Indians and the indigent as people, our laws and our legal system would possibly not be as jacked up as they are today.
You know, he could have written that hoax on Obama's thesis.
Reverend Jeremiah Wright, President Obama, they are interchangeable.
Let's not forget Reverend Wright's greatest hits.
Barack knows what it means to be a black man living in a country and a culture that is controlled by rich white people.
Hillary ain't never been called a nigger.
Bill did us just like he did Monica Lewinsky.
He was riding dirty in white America, US of KKKA, black men turning on black men.
I am sick of Negroes who just do not get it.
Not God bless America.
God America that's in the Bible for killing innocent people.
God America.
And now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back into our own front yards.
America's chickens are coming home to roost.
The greatest hits of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, President Obama's pastor for 20 years, back after this.
And we're back.
It's Rush Limboy and the EIB Network.
Dear Rush, I took your advice nine months ago.
I signed up for Carbonite.
This past Saturday, I lost my operating system to the point where I could not run my computer.
I had to wipe it clean.
I had to reload windows.
Thank God for carbonite.
All of my files came back.
It's like I never had a problem.
And then he says, the price the Carbonite people charge for the service is worth its weight in gold.
It also saved my marriage, as my wife would likely not put up with a mean and grumpy husband who just lost all of his key files.
Thanks for telling us about a great product.
Rush.
Signed a believer, Mike, Carbonite.com.
Go there.
Use offer code Rush.
You'll save big money.
Carbonite backs up your hard drive.
It happens in the background.
You don't see it happening.
You'll forget that you have it, but it's working every time you're connected to the internet, and you will lose data on your hard drive.
It happens to everybody at some point for some of the strangest, craziest reasons, including theft of your machine and that kind of thing.
It costs just $55 a year.
That's less than $5 a month.
You've got a genuine 15-day free trial and two free months if you decide to buy it.
Carbonite.com, offer code Rush.
Let's, one more thing here about these elections today.
I have another profundity, another truth for you.
This is the dirty little secret.
We know that all political parties, the two big ones, Republicans and Democrats alike, we know that these parties know what the winning message is.
They know it.
Every campaign ad running right now is stressing what?
Cutting taxes, cutting spending, growing the economy.
Every campaign.
Republican and Democrat alike.
That is the message.
Doesn't matter what the party affiliation is.
In fact, in some races, the Democrats sound more conservative on these things than a lot of the Republicans, the so-called Republicans.
Which is why elections are held in November.
It's about as far away from April 15th as you can get.
But after today, the media will get back on message.
We'll see stories of the people want more spending and, of course, higher taxes.
But both parties know it, folks.
Both parties know what the winning message is.
Some are just better at explaining it than others.
Tim in Suffolk, Virginia.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hey, Rush, thank you very much.
I appreciate what you do for conservatives and, of course, what you do for me as well.
I'm surviving this Obama Depression real well.
But you mentioned earlier how the media and these Democrats are talking about how moderates are leaving the Republican Party.
If that were true, the Democrats would be happy.
Axelrod would be, you and I, we'd be high-fiving each other if the Democrat Party were falling apart.
If it were true, the moderates are leaving the Republican Party.
Why aren't they happy?
Look at Axelrod on TV or Gibbs or any of these Democrats.
Are they happy?
No.
They're glum.
Here in Virginia, the three candidates, I'm in Virginia.
We've got a governor's race, attorney general, lieutenant governor.
All three of these guys are being cast as conservatives by their opponent and by the media.
And they're up by 10 points.
I don't know what's going to happen here in Virginia, but it certainly looks like we'll have the three top offices are going to people that are being cast as Republicans.
The three Democrats, they're milquetoast.
If anything, they're moderates.
But why aren't these Democrats all excited?
Well, they're modernites to leaving the party.
That was my point earlier.
I watch fluff, a pluff on TV today, an axelrod, and they're all so alarmed that the Republican Party is losing its moderates.
It's as though they're sitting in the White House.
Gee, we want that party strong.
We want the Republican Party strong so that we can stay on edge.
We want a good competitor.
The last thing that Barack Obama and his pals don't like, opposition.
Absolutely.
They sweep the field.
They clean it up.
They get out.
Get rid of it.
That's why.
And of course, we have idiots on our side, Tim, my brother, who believe them.
Oh, yeah, it's an honorable thing to have moderates in the party and so forth.
It's, you know, I look forward to the day when the Republican Party ceases accepting any premise put forward by the Democrats, the liberals, and the media.
All right, a quick time out here, folks.
Thanks, Tim, for the phone call.
We'll be right back.
All right, folks.
Speaking of big tents, let's count all the conservatives in the Democrat Party, shall we?
And let's count all the conservatives in the Democrat National Committee.
And let's count all the conservatives in the Obama administration.
Let's count all the conservatives in the big media.
Let's count all the conservatives in Hollywood.
Let's count all the conservatives in academia.
You want to talk about big tents?
Let's talk about all of the pro-lifers in the Democrat Party.
What happens to them?
You know, this big tents to throw it right back in their faces.
Tell them they need the big tent.
They're the exclusionary ones.
We'll see you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection