All Episodes
Previous Next
July 1, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:42
July 1, 2009, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings and welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Such a thrill and a delight to have you with us.
I am Rush Limbaugh from the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies behind this.
A golden EIB microphone.
Not only, ladies and gentlemen, am I the last man standing?
I am America's last best hope.
Telephone number 800-282-2882, and the email address is El Rushbo at EIB net.com if you would like to be on the program.
Now moments ago I described to you watching just as you would watch television.
There are many things you and I do that we do the same way, although many of you doubt that it's true.
I watch TV the way everybody else does.
And Obama was having a town hall meeting out there in Avon, something or other of Virginia.
Avondon, Avondale or whatever.
Annandale.
Just outside Washington, right?
Probably only took uh what a G five to fly there.
At any rate, normally at these things, at these Obama town meetings, you've got these young, vivacious, excited young cultists.
They're out there and they're all jazzed and they're all excited why he has arrived.
This crowd looked dead.
They looked like this was the last place they wanted to be.
They did not look excited.
They had long faces.
They were frowning.
And then I was told that there was a um uh sort of a dust up this afternoon at the press here the the the uh Robert Gibbs uh briefing in the uh in the White House.
And we and it was we have two sound bites.
Press Secretary Robert Gibbs did the daily press briefing, and during the QA, Chip Reed of CBS said, you know, this town hall meeting that the president's doing later this afternoon is very tightly controlled.
I mean, it feels I mean, the concept of a town hall, I think, is to have an open public forum.
And this sounds like a very tightly controlled audience and list of questions.
Why do it that way?
How about we do this?
How about you you you can ask me that question tomorrow based on what questions were asked rather than pre-selecting your question uh based on something that may or may not uh come from.
Why pre-select?
Why not just open it up to people and allow any question to come in?
Well, I uh Chip, I think if you get on your computer from your email address, have you sent in your question?
I think that would be inappropriate.
This was for the public.
Well, I'm sorry, I'm confused.
Are you not a member of the public?
Ooh, ICE.
ICE is forming in the Gibbs White House briefing room.
This was a tightly controlled.
I I I wish I could give you the names here.
There is.
Well, let me just give the second soundbite.
I don't want to lose the context here.
Next up is Helen Thomas, and she's not digging any of this either.
I don't think you people call for openness and transparency.
And maybe you haven't even heard the questions.
It doesn't matter.
It's the process.
Even if there's a tough question, it's a it's a question coming from somebody who was invited or has screened.
Or the question was screened.
Uh, let's have this discussion at the conclusion of the town hall meeting.
How about that?
How so?
Is it any evidence currently going on that I'm controlling the press?
No, poorly out of your formal engagements are pre-packaged.
How so?
Well, and controlling the by calling reporters the night before and tell them they're going to be called on.
That is shocking.
I we've had this discussion ad nauseum and uh of course you would, because you don't have any answers.
Whoa, Helen!
Helen and Chip Reed having a cow at the Robert Gibbs press briefing.
Now, what they're talking about, what's obviously outraged them here, is the Huffpaw guy got into the last formal press conference with a staged question.
He was told the night before he's gonna get in there on a temporary pass, a visitor pass, and here's the question that we want you to ask, and they go, Oh, I'm more than happy to do it.
And the question he asked was uh Mr. President, we're in contact with people inside Iran, Iranian citizens, and they are saying XXX.
whole thing was staged.
And the press.
See, it's it's it's it they're just they're outraged here that Gibbs would stage this.
So what that what this means is they know everything else has been staged.
How did they know this this town meeting was staged?
They only know it because everything is.
Folks, that ABC thing, that infomercial was staged.
Obama dominant was a filibuster.
He got 60% of the time.
And the questions were largely known.
And ABC didn't want anybody in there who didn't agree with the whole premise of socialized medicine, nationalized health care.
So they know, they know it's only when the reason they're really mad is not the stuff is staged.
Or they'd have blown up about it long before this.
They're mad that an interloper got in amongst them at a serious press conference, the Huff Poe.
It's nothing more than an in-dead blog.
It's nothing more than an in-dead blog.
And and the and these people, they are serious practitioners of the art of journalism.
And to have an interloper thrown in there.
They're as mad as when Al Sharpton discovered that a Jewish guy opened a clothing store in Harlem had to get that interloper out.
Same thing here.
So regardless, it's fun to listen to.
And Gibbs didn't know what to do, he didn't know what to say.
And when you watch this, if you do see any tape of this, you just take a look at the crowd.
There was nothing they could do to hide the fact that this crowd was dead.
It looked like, in fact, this crowd had been rounded up that they were going to be doing something else, like going to a movie, or maybe maybe half of them going to the welfare office to get the check, and they'd been interrupted, said, No, before you go get the check, you're going in here to listen to the president.
I don't know.
He sat there that sour looks on their faces.
It was um it was amazing to see.
Now, the stage here's the story.
I can't mention any names.
But as you know, President Obama has many round tables made up of private American citizens from various industries.
He's got an economic round table, he has uh uh banking round table, all these other things.
And at one of these meetings, I'm not gonna tell you which round table it was, but don't doubt me on this.
One of these meetings, they were all given questions to ask.
This televised around noon, right when this program starts.
Back, this is back in the days where they had the work groups and the study groups, and they dispatch them out there to solve the problem in an afternoon.
And they gave the participants in this particular round table the questions to ask.
And so this guy in the round table asked a question that he was given.
And President Obama botched it, the smithereens.
After the meeting, a key White House official approached this man and said, How dare you embarrass the president this way?
Well, well, I asked the question, how dare you embarrass the president this way?
And this guy's okay, I see what's going on here.
And uh so we apologize.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry.
I I you know, you're right.
I I didn't they're scared to death of these people.
Guy gets back to where he lives and gets a call from a White House official.
This isn't over.
I'm coming out and we're gonna have lunch.
You don't embarrass the president this way.
I mean, this is the mayor daily way, this is the Chicago thug way.
Uh and these people in the press know that all this stuff is staged.
I mean, how do they know today's was staged?
Anybody would give me a wild guess?
How'd they know today's was staged?
It's somebody leak it.
It is my contention that all of them are staged.
All these things are staged, and they have been through the campaign.
Somebody is pre-programmed as Obama's not gonna.
He's he's not the the only time he takes a flyer is with a press conference, and that's when he gets give people the evil eye.
You know, the Hawaii stink eye.
That's when he gives them a stink eye.
So there you have it.
I was told it was good, and it uh turned out to be brief timeout.
Well, you know, we've only got one phone call in a day, right?
That's not good.
That's not good.
Over two hours.
So we'll get to some phone calls when we come back.
I promise, right after this.
As you know, this week, ladies and gentlemen, we have been chronicling the effects, the impact, the results of the chicken of news.
And I just found a doozy at MSNBC dot com.
But I promised phone calls, so we're going to go to the phone.
We also have four sound bites from the staged town meeting.
And a soundbite here from Valerie Jarrett.
So the questions might have been known to everybody, but the president know what they were.
The president has not seen questions his staff has selected for him to answer.
He doesn't have to.
They talk about it all the time.
At any rate, I'll I'll defer that because people have been patiently waiting.
Oh, and did you hear there has been an actual rape in uh at Duke University, an actual rape in Durham, North Carolina.
Not a phony fit, not a false charge of actual rape.
A guy sold his adopted five-year-old son to sex practitioners.
Five-year-old kid, yeah.
There's a problem with this, too, because the guy is gay, uh, gay adoption, and of course, this is why you haven't heard about it.
This does not fit the template.
The false charge of rape at Duke when you had the the poor black down underlooked dancer and the rich white lacrosse players.
That fit the template guilty.
Well, I mean, before any evidence.
This you haven't heard about, because this doesn't this is it doesn't fit template here of what we're trying to accomplish.
But we'll get to all that in the next half hour.
In the meantime, here's Kathy in Potomac, Maryland.
Thank you so much for waiting.
Great to have you here.
Professor Limbaugh, it's an honor to be in your classroom.
My hand's been up for a long time, so I thank you for calling.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
I understand.
I appreciate your patience.
I have two experiences I want to share with you, and I'll be brief.
First is I'd like to tell you about the experience I had when I called my representative last Friday to urge that he vote against the carbon tax film.
Who was it?
Representative Chris Van Holland.
Oh, yeah, he's run, he's he's uh Democrat campaign committee in the House.
He's in the leadership.
Yeah, exactly right.
And I asked to speak with his staff member responsible for the issue and had a rather testy exchange.
The bottom line is that this gentleman insisted that the cost per family would be minimal according to the congressional budget on this report.
Well, I disagreed with his analysis, and he asked where I got my information.
And I told him the Heritage Foundation, and he laughed at me.
I then said, I would appreciate you not laughing because Heritage is actually a premier research organization.
So this man then asked that I go to the CBO report and read it for myself, and he gave me the online link.
So I did that.
I read it, and then I also reread the Heritage Report, which explained in detail why the CBO report was flawed.
So I was undeterred, Rush, and I called the staffer back, and I explained why the CBO report was flawed and gave him the heritage link, and then I gave him three Wall Street Journal articles that were particularly relevant, and I asked him, Do you read the Wall Street Journal?
And he said, uh, well, not on a regular basis.
Um they've probably had to fight back laughter on that one, too.
Right, right.
So we're dealing with economic illiterates, which is why it's not a good thing.
No, you're not.
No, you're not.
I mean, that may be true.
You're dealing with authoritarian statists.
Quasi Marxists.
You're dealing with people.
They don't it re in reality, that CBO number, that's just a technique to help them lie and sell this.
They don't care what the they know the CBO number's wrong.
They know how destructive this is.
This is about advancing a concept of growth of government, more and more power over people in the private sector in their homes.
This is about the destruction of the U.S. capitalist system as it exists.
Because that's these people think it's immoral.
They think it's unjust, they think it's unfair.
Now, this this Democratic House of Representatives is the farthest fringe of radical left that this country has ever seen, particularly the majority they've always been some of these type radicals in the house but they've never run the thing now they are and one of them is in the White House as well.
This guy he no more interested in the truth this staffer you spoke to he's no more interest he want he'll talk to you make you think he's concerned about the truth he doesn't care.
Van Holland was going to vote on this no matter what you could have told Van Holland that this vote will set off a nuclear detonation somewhere around where he'd still vote for it.
Rush can I tell you one more story related to that back in back in April I went to the Tea Party in Washington across from the White House and I happened to strike up a conversation with a gentleman standing near me.
It turns out he's with the EPA and I said to him well tell me what you think about carbon credits.
He rolled his eyes and said he learned a long time ago to be skeptical of his own agency's modeling.
And I asked him well why don't you be a whistleblower?
He said, you know I've seen what happens to people so I'm just going to lay low and try to keep people honest.
Just wanted to share that with you.
Yeah well there has been a guy that submitted a report as what was his name Carlin I think I'm going to be a mental block.
Uh got the story.
He's been on television he's talking about this I'll have to find it during the break but he did you wouldn't call him really a whistleblower.
He said hey to the in inside the agency he said hey the you know the science here is not settled.
Shut up and don't send your email to anybody else and stop talking about look at what you ran into with Van Holland's staff person.
It's the same thing in the EPA on on uh on on cap and trade.
It this is gonna have it doesn't matter what the truth is in fact people that have the truth that can counter this are gonna be censored silenced and s and shut up this this is anybody still looks at all this as with a civics 101 mindset is missing how how this uh ball game is being played right now.
This is this is not about anything but the pure unstoppable 100% undiluted grab for power socialist Marxist power that these people have died for well not literally but I mean they have they have just been salivating over it since the sixties and now they're there and there aren't the numbers to stop them.
First chance to stop them is going to be 2010 here's uh Vic in San Antonio hey Vic thank you for waiting I appreciate it you're next rush how are you my friend fine and dandy thank you sir I wanna I want to jump on this hypocrisy of the statement about what happened in Iraq I'm a four combat tour vet retired first sergeant and I'm now the chairman and CEO of a veterans organization here in the country and I don't know if I can or not but I think I kind of have the authority to say what I'm about to say and that is I am tired of the hypocrisy.
Stop telling everybody that you're taking credit for something you kicked us in the teeth for you you beat us down.
You there I can't remember how many times folks have said we can't win this war.
Let's carve the country up into three sectors I think the vice president said at one point now he's denying he said it by the way absolutely and I want to thank you personally because I saw that yesterday and uh I saw that you jumped on us as I was looking and I hope the rest of the media out there jumps on this too because it's high time that all of us at SERB get credit for what we did.
And if you want to blame President Bush for everything that's gone wrong in America for a hundred years at least have the integrity to put integrity over politics and thank the man for the fact that the surge actually worked and further the New York Times I'm challenging them as as the as the chairman and CEO of a of a veterans organization to come out now and publish a fur full page article telling General Petrayus we're sorry you were right we were wrong well done.
You got you don't expect any of that to happen.
You don't expect the media to jump into Obama's chili over this the media the media is upset because they staged a question from the Huffpoe.
That's all they're upset about.
They're happy for Obama to take the credit on uh on all of this ladies and gentlemen this whether it be Iraq or any other policy you have to understand what what we we've got we got a guy here that that he's got a serious serious self love complex,
he's nothing is going to stop him from doing what he intends to do.
You say ought to bring George Bush in there and this ceremony yesterday.
Well, of course, a stand-up guy would, if the situation were different, if Bill Clinton had started the surge that led to victory in Iraq, George W. Bush would have had him in there on the day.
You know, Bush was a man of whatever else you think about, I mean, full of class.
Zilch Zero Nada from this bunch.
And again, don't get any expectations that the press is going to get investigatory or investigative with this guy because that's not in the cards.
That woman that called from Potomac, Maryland said something very important.
She called and she looked up the uh data on cap and trade on the Heritage Foundation.
She used AskHeritage.org.
We we talk about it all the time here.
AskHeritage.org, she got their scholarly analysis of the cap and trade bill, and she called Chris Van Holland's uh staffer in charge of running that bill and was able to run smoke rings around it.
Because the heritage analysis explained why the CBO analysis of the cost was all wrong and inaccurate.
And uh really it is a it's a gold mine of information and heritage foundation, we're celebrating our independence this week.
Freedom, what the people in Cuba, North Korea, or Iran wish they had in their lives, and I frankly, many more Americans wish they had more freedom in our lives.
There's been a lot of it lost here in the last six months.
But this country celebrated and fought for freedom for 233 years, and it's a daily fight.
Fight for freedom is daily.
Right there in the declaration, life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
Seven of the most famous words authored by our founding fathers in the Declaration of Independence.
And a descendant of that kind of thinking is where is the Paritage Foundation?
Ask Heritage.org, WWW, and I guarantee you folks, uh just 25 bucks to join, and an encyclopedia becomes available to you at your fingertips, right on your computer keyboard.
Okay, I have I gotta deal with something here.
I'm in my 20, almost August 1st would be 21 years.
And for about twenty of these, maybe even maybe 21 of the 21 and a half years, there hasn't been a day go by that I haven't been asked.
Rush, why are liberals the way they are?
You take a look at the Supreme Court decision on the Ricci case of the firefighters in New Haven.
Four human beings, four Americans saw no discrimination against the white firefighters in the case when it was obvious.
And Ruth Bader Ginsberg, writing for the minority, said, while the firefighters deserve our sympathy, no, they don't.
They deserve justice and equality before the law, Madam Justice.
How could four human beings look at the details of that case and not find it outrageously unamerican wrong?
But they did it, four of them.
Four of the nine.
F. Scott Fitzgerald said, the rich are different.
That needs to be updated.
Liberals are different.
We do not know how they think.
We attach our own rationality and common sense to our analysis of what they do.
And we continually are befuddled.
I think it's time to ask the question.
Just as many people have puzzled over the origins of homosexuality.
People have been puzzling over this for I mean, the question is still asked do these people choose that or are they born this way?
I think we need to ask the same question of liberals.
Are they born that way?
Or do they choose it?
Because there's no rational explanation for it.
Other than it's easy.
All you gotta do is see some suffering and say that you care and think other people should do something about it.
And you are liberal.
And it gets even worse when you start telling other people how to live their lives.
And part and parcel of liberalism is having elements of this country that you just despise.
You think unjust and immoral have to be changed?
But mostly you don't have to think, you just have to feel, and we all feel, except certain men.
Uh I said what?
You can't believe I said what?
See.
You just want me to ask it again.
That's all you're doing.
You're just snurdly expressing mock shock that I would ask the question.
Like he couldn't have heard it the first time.
All right, in case the people at Media Matters and MSNBC missed it, here it is again.
We need to ask a very important question about liberals.
Were they born that way or do they choose it?
Now back to the phones.
Keith and Lincoln, Lincoln, Kansas.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, here's my thing.
On these climate bill or global warming and health care, why when the Democrats have to offer a bill, and they do it at 3 30 in the morning, which goes up to 1,600 pages, we don't even get five days to read it.
Why do the other party, no matter which one it is, have to come back with a counter proposal for an offer?
Why don't we just have one bill go before them and drop it, and then it's it's legible, it's readable, and you can get it done and not have to search and search and search and search.
Uh I'm not sure I understand the nature of the question.
I well, I looked on the board here, I thought you were going to be asking me a political strategic question, but that's not what you're asking.
Well, this is basically what it is.
Why does there have to be an amendment?
And why not just have a bill on the on the uh okay, okay.
The Civics 101.
Look at Democrats wrote the bill.
Waxman Markey Obama wrote the bill.
After it was written, it wasn't enough to get Democrats in a majority to vote for it.
The amendment was pork.
The amendment was earmarks.
The amendment was Marcy Captor, here's three and a half billion dollars for you in Ohio.
If you'll gut the coal industry, we'll give you three and a half billion dollars so you can dole out so people that can play around with these new alternative energies.
I thought you were going to ask me why do the Republicans propose an alternative, and your point was gonna be they shouldn't.
And I with that I would agree.
I don't think you know any time the the the whole mess in Washington is that everybody believes that unless they're doing something, some legislation being worked on that something's wrong, and it's exact opposite.
We are never safer within when they are on recess.
What happens here, the Democrats advance a health care bill, national health care, and the Republicans, well, that's a little bit uh overreaching.
We think we need to trim it here and trim it.
No.
The answer is screw the whole thing.
You want it, you vote for it, you pass it, you do the committee hearings, we're not gonna have anything to do with it.
They don't have the numbers to stop it, and that ought to be their reaction.
I thought that's what you were asking me.
You're asking me, how come a bill can't just be a bill, they had amendments?
Because the first bill wasn't enough to buy off enough Democrats to vote for it.
So the other 300 pages was basically SOPs to recalcitrant Democrats in agriculture states and coal states to basically uh allow conventional energy businesses in their states to go broke in exchange for money that would allow the member of Congress to continually be reelected.
Um Ladies and gentlemen.
This is this is incredible.
We've been chronicling for you uh all week the chickification of state run media.
Uh I mean, the chickification are going on for a long time, but what uh we here at the EIB network have literally been floored and flabbergasted over the way liberal females in the media have been reporting the Mark Sanford story.
Yesterday, the Pice de Resistance.
He deserved credit because he may have stepped out on the Mittress a couple of times, but he didn't cheat on her.
And they're swooning over his love letters.
Meanwhile, this woman, we got to be honest about something.
This woman, the girl of Mipanema, that everybody is also, is she going nuts over?
Everybody is all excited about her.
Oh, she's beautiful, oh, she's this.
She knew he was married.
She knew he had kids.
How come she gets a pass in this?
The one real classy figure in this whole story is Mrs. Sanford.
But it's caused us to pay even closer attention to stories in the media.
Uh, written, uh, edited, ordered by liberal women.
And here's one from uh this morning.
8 30.
8 30 from MSNBC.
Capri pants bear the scourge of summer.
Cankles.
Cheeky Jim campaign gives us yet another body part to worry about.
This is by Jackelyn Stenson.
Still obsessing.
Now, this is this is this is MSNBC.
This is a this is a state-run mainstream media news site.
Still obsessing about how your dimpled thighs, jelly belly, or flappy arms look in a swimsuit?
Well, that's so last summer.
This year there's a new body part to fret over, the cankle.
Now, I first I've heard the term in this story.
I think I know what it is.
Do you uh know what a can?
What is it?
How would you describe cankle, Mr. Snerdley?
Okay, Mr. Snerdley, Media Matters uh uh uh uh MSNBC if you're listening, uh Bo Snurdley, the official program observer here, thinks the definition of cankles is you think Hillary Clinton.
You you stand by that.
Okay.
All right, okay, so and the Capri pants would illustrate the cankle problem, right?
And it's summertime and you all right, okay.
Um, you may be wondering what's a cankle.
Well, Gold's Gym, which has designated July as Cankel Awareness Month.
Cankle.
This is what you get with chickification of the news.
Do you think if Cronkite or Huntley Brickley's still around, this would ever see the light of day.
Gold's Gym has designated July as cankle awareness month, and they defined it this way.
The word comes from the combination of calf and ankle.
It occurs when the calf merges with an obese or swollen ankle.
So there's the definition right out of this the NBC website.
Cankles are the fastest growing aesthetic affliction in the U.S., says Jacqueline Stenson.
Even ahead of other bathing suit killers like muffin tops, saddlebags, and moobs.
Now, I don't know what a moob is, and I'm not sure.
I think I got saddlebags down, but muffin tops, well, I'd have to guess here.
But don't worry, Snerdley, I don't want you to define this as I'm running out of time.
In fact, it is estimated that if current trends continue by the year 2012, cankles will surpass love handles as the number one aesthetic affliction in the world.
I you think I'm making this up, it's right here.
So everything's a crisis.
Everything's a health care, health now, cankles are a crisis.
But let me get to the piece that is this on the next page.
I might have a cankel czar.
I mean, if it could help pass the health care bill.
If it's this big an affliction, if it's this big an affliction, I can say if somebody comes up with a cure for it, you damn well know people are going to demand it.
Now, Gold's Gym has a plan.
Gold's gym, this is Cankel's Awareness Month.
Not month.
They have a plan to quote prevent, treat, and minimize the appearance of cankles.
And they focus on three areas.
I can't believe they're serious.
I can't believe this is not scrapple face of the onion or some parody site.
Here are the three areas of focus at Gold's Gym to get rid of cankles.
Exercise.
Diet.
And don't wear short pants.
No.
You don't you don't have to exercise or diet.
To avoid.
But not wearing short pants is not gonna cure or minimize the well, it'll minimize the appearance of Kangles, but it's not going to fix chicken in the news.
Okay, we've just learned uh well I just learned what cankles are.
I bet I know something uh the condition that you've never heard of.
It's called faced.
Faced.
It is when the chest and the and the head merge when there's no neck.
Uh think Al Gore.
And I don't I don't see Gold's gym doing anything about Gore's face problem, nor do I hear any chicks in the news writing about it.
All right, James in Indianapolis.
As we go back to the phones, thank you for calling, sir.
Nice to have you here on the EIB network.
It's a pleasure, Rush.
Nice to be with you.
Uh first time caller.
Welcome here.
Uh great to have you with us.
Uh I'm basically calling a comment on the question you pose, is liberalism a born or is it a learned trait?
Chosen.
Born versus chosen.
Yeah.
I'm on the from birth side.
And the reason I guess I am is because it's kind of like your and pardon the pardon the example, but your religious choice is passed down from family member to family member due to why you're taught as a young child.
I understand I I understand your thinking on this.
Uh uh.
But when I say born with it, I mean I totally get what you mean.
Like totally born with an unchangeable.
You're not born innocent and your parents pollute you one way or the other.
You're born with it at genetic.
Uh because I'm, you know, I have to ask myself, why in the hell would people choose to be liberals?
Well, I understand.
And I and us liberals, I guess, would choose or say the comment, why would someone choose to be conservative?
Okay, so Rob, but I was telling your screener, as long as I can remember, though, as a child, and not necessarily from all my parental guidance or things like that.
I've always I've always felt an equal or a fairness from man to man, from gender to gender, from race to race, in terms of things like education and job and just things like that.
So as far as I can remember, it's something I've always had with me from birth.
Yeah, well, I th I I believe you.
But yeah, totally believe you.
You know, see, it doesn't matter to you that there's no such thing as equality or fairness in terms of outcomes.
It's just not possible.
We're all different.
But that doesn't compute with you because no, I'm not arguing that he said that's what, you know, believes it's not possible for everybody to be treated fairly or equal in terms of outcomes.
Before the law, yeah.
That's good, but and that doesn't even happen.
Ask the firefighters in New Haven, thanks to a bunch of liberals.
I have a news alert here from the Wall Street Journal.
Uh car makers have reported steep sales declines.
Really?
They've cut out a bunch of dealers, they've cut back on advertising, and being run by the government.
What's what how's this even worth a news alert?
This is standard operating news procedure.
Can all have predicted this.
That's it, folks.
Fastest three hours in media gone.
But there's always tomorrow, twenty-one hours from now.
▲
Export Selection